20.01.2014 Views

Adoption of Improved Sorghum and Pearl Millet ... - Icrisat

Adoption of Improved Sorghum and Pearl Millet ... - Icrisat

Adoption of Improved Sorghum and Pearl Millet ... - Icrisat

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

On-station trials, pearl millet<br />

The new pearl millet varieties have been widely tested <strong>and</strong> compared with the released variety<br />

Serere 17 <strong>and</strong> local varieties across several sites in the country (Table 5). Recommendation for<br />

release was based on data from 17 on-station trials at Ilonga, Hombolo, Ukiriguru, <strong>and</strong> Lubaga.<br />

Supplementary data were also available from on-farm testing sites from villages in Dodoma <strong>and</strong><br />

Singida regions.<br />

On-farm trials, pearl millet<br />

The varieties were evaluated at 21 unreplicated sites across five villages in three districts –<br />

Dodoma Rural, Singida Rural, <strong>and</strong> Iramba (Table 6). During these evaluations farmers were most<br />

impressed by the earliness, head length, <strong>and</strong> yield <strong>of</strong> Okoa. All farmers ranked Okoa <strong>and</strong> Shibe<br />

first <strong>and</strong> second respectively, because both were visibly superior to the local varieties used as<br />

controls. Okoa gave the highest grain yield (2.31 t ha -1 ), followed by Shibe (1.85 t ha -1 ). Serere<br />

17 <strong>and</strong> the local variety gave 1.62 t ha -1 . Okoa <strong>and</strong> Shibe have the same tillering ability; the<br />

former’s yield superiority is likely due to its greater average ear length.<br />

Table 4. <strong>Sorghum</strong> variety performance in on-farm trials, Same district, 1995/96 season.<br />

Yield advantage<br />

Days to flowering Plant height (cm) Mean grain yield (t ha -1 ) over local variety<br />

Pato 68 179 2.13 117%<br />

Tegemeo 67 162 1.97 101%<br />

Macia 64 130 1.50 53%<br />

Local variety 85 0.98<br />

Pato, Tegemeo: data from 2 seasons, 10 unreplicated environments. Macia: data from 1 season, 3 unreplicated environments<br />

Local variety data are long-term average for respective area<br />

Table 5. <strong>Pearl</strong> millet grain yields (t ha -1 ) in on-station trials, 1991/92 to 1994/95.<br />

Yield advantage<br />

91/92 92/93 93/94 94/95 Mean No. <strong>of</strong> sites over local variety<br />

Okoa 1.91 2.61 2.12 1.92 2.14 14 48%<br />

Shibe 1.69 2.15 1.90 2.07 1.98 17 37%<br />

Serere 17 1.17 1.67 1.29 1.59 1.43 17 – 1.4%<br />

Local variety 1.20 1.68 1.24 1.67 1.45 17<br />

Table 6. <strong>Pearl</strong> millet variety performance in on-farm trials, Dodoma, Singida, <strong>and</strong> Iramba districts, 1993/94<br />

season.<br />

Plant height Panicle length Mean grain yield Yield advantage<br />

Days to flowering (cm) (cm) (t ha -1 ) over local variety<br />

Okoa 62 198 43 2.31 42%<br />

Shibe 67 214 39 1.85 14%<br />

Serere 17 53 175 24 1.62 0%<br />

Local variety 67 211 36 1.62<br />

Flowering, plant height, panicle length, <strong>and</strong> yield based on average <strong>of</strong> 17, 11, 16, <strong>and</strong> 21 unreplicated environments respectively<br />

6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!