20.01.2014 Views

Adoption of Improved Sorghum and Pearl Millet ... - Icrisat

Adoption of Improved Sorghum and Pearl Millet ... - Icrisat

Adoption of Improved Sorghum and Pearl Millet ... - Icrisat

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

two seasons: 1998/99 (poor season, long dry spells, below-normal harvests) <strong>and</strong> 1999/2000,<br />

which was a normal season. Farmers reported that Pato gave the highest yields. Across the two<br />

seasons, yields were Pato 1.2 t ha -1 , followed by Tegemeo 0.98 <strong>and</strong> Serena 0.82 t ha -1 , compared<br />

to an average <strong>of</strong> 0.62 t ha -1 from the local varieties used as controls (Table 16).<br />

Data are not reported for two other improved varieties, Lulu <strong>and</strong> Macia, which are grown by<br />

less than 5% <strong>of</strong> farmers nationally <strong>and</strong> are confined to one or two regions only. Macia was<br />

released only in 1999, <strong>and</strong> little seed has been distributed. Lulu is an old variety released in the<br />

1960s; seed is no longer maintained by the national seed service <strong>and</strong> is available only from other<br />

farmers.<br />

<strong>Pearl</strong> millet is grown mostly in Dodoma, Singida, Shinyanga, <strong>and</strong> Tabora. The two varieties<br />

with significant adoption are Okoa <strong>and</strong> Serere 17. <strong>Adoption</strong> <strong>of</strong> Shibe, released 6 years ago, is<br />

very limited; although adoption may be under-reported, as discussed above. Farmers reported<br />

that Okoa gave the highest yield, 1 t ha -1 (Table 16). Serere 17 yielded significantly less than<br />

local l<strong>and</strong>races, largely because <strong>of</strong> its vulnerability to birds. This variety has essentially been<br />

rejected for this reason, <strong>and</strong> is now found only in parts <strong>of</strong> Singida <strong>and</strong> Shinyanga. In these areas,<br />

there has been considerable introgression (due to natural cross-pollination) <strong>of</strong> Serere with local<br />

l<strong>and</strong>races, thus delaying its maturity <strong>and</strong> reducing its vulnerability to bird damage.<br />

Overall, the new sorghum <strong>and</strong> pearl millet varieties outyielded local l<strong>and</strong>races by 10 to 38%,<br />

under farmer management conditions.<br />

Farmers’ Varietal Preferences<br />

<strong>Sorghum</strong><br />

In order to underst<strong>and</strong> variety-preference criteria, farmers were asked what they liked most<br />

about each sorghum variety they were growing (Table 17).<br />

Farmers growing improved varieties (Pato, Tegemeo, Macia, Serena, Lulu), almost without<br />

exception, cited one or both <strong>of</strong> two traits – early maturity <strong>and</strong> drought tolerance (which are in<br />

fact closely related). These two traits, as well as good taste <strong>and</strong> high yield, were the<br />

characteristics farmers most liked in these varieties. Farmers were impressed by early maturity<br />

Table 16. Average yield (t ha -1 ) from improved <strong>and</strong> local varieties based on survey data, 2000/01 cropping<br />

season.<br />

Variety<br />

Mean ± SD<br />

<strong>Sorghum</strong><br />

Pato (n=42) 1.2 ± 0.91<br />

Tegemeo (n=27) 0.98 ± 0.55<br />

Serena (n=30) 0.82 ± 0.62<br />

Local (n=131) 0.62 ± 0.54<br />

Mean (n=230) 0.75 ± 0.50<br />

<strong>Pearl</strong> millet<br />

Okoa (n=21) 1.0 ± 0.63<br />

Serere 17 (n=8) 0.52 ± 0.35<br />

Local (n=32) 0.91 ± 0.72<br />

Mean (n=61) 0.81 ± 0.56<br />

14

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!