24.01.2014 Views

web_vol47 4.pdf - International Hospital Federation

web_vol47 4.pdf - International Hospital Federation

web_vol47 4.pdf - International Hospital Federation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Policy: Egypt<br />

Public policy and medical tourism:<br />

Ethical implications for the Egyptian<br />

health care system<br />

ROB HALEY<br />

ASSISTANT PROFESSOR, PUBLIC HEALTH DEPARTMENT,<br />

UNIVERSITY OF NORTH FLORIDA, USA<br />

ABSTRACT: Egypt’s medical tourism industry has been experiencing tremendous growth. However, Egypt continues to lack<br />

the necessary investment in its public health system to effectively care for its population. Current policy and the<br />

emergence of medical tourism have led to unequal health care access, resulting in high a prevalence of infectious<br />

diseases and lack of resources for its most vulnerable populations. As a new Egyptian government emerges, it is important<br />

for policymakers to understand the critical issues and ethical concerns of existing health policy. This understanding may<br />

be used to propose new policy that more effectively allocates resources to care for Egypt’s population.<br />

In January 2011, Egyptians began demonstrating in Cairo’s Tahrir<br />

Square as part of a much broader movement called the “Arab<br />

Spring.” This movement served to communicate the<br />

population’s growing economic and political discontent and is<br />

resulting in unprecedented political change in the Middle East (The<br />

Economist 2011). Egyptians were particularly steadfast in<br />

demanding change despite the fact that Egypt’s economy had<br />

been experiencing tremendous growth over the past several<br />

decades. However, it continued to lack the necessary investment<br />

in its public health system to effectively care for its population<br />

(Haley and Bég 2010). This lack of priority and funding is best<br />

illustrated by Egypt’s overall spending on health care of just 3.7<br />

percent of GDP; far lower than the17.6 percent spent by the<br />

United States (Auerback and Kellermann 2011). More importantly,<br />

of this 3.7 percent, less than 43 percent was attributed to Egypt’s<br />

public health system while more than 57 percent was allocated to<br />

the relatively more affluent private health care sector (Fouad 2005).<br />

Egypt’s public policy tended to favor the private sector, particularly<br />

the sectors that supported its tourism industry and its emerging<br />

medical tourism market. This inequity is of significant concern<br />

because Egypt’s health indicators are among the lowest in the<br />

region (WHO 2004).<br />

In February 2011, Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak resigned<br />

and a new government will likely face an extraordinary and<br />

persistent demand for fair and equitable public policies. Policymakers<br />

will likely experience significant challenges as it attempts<br />

to create a new government and rebuild its tourism industry and<br />

medical tourism market. This article aims to inform Egyptian<br />

policymakers of the importance of identifying policy that results in<br />

an equitable and adequately resourced public health system. It<br />

also identifies ethical issues and concerns regarding current<br />

Egyptian public policy and identifies solutions for policymakers to<br />

consider when developing new public health policy.<br />

Egypt’s tourism industry and public health<br />

Egypt’s tourism industry produces approximately $4 billion per<br />

year and accounts for over 11 percent of its gross domestic<br />

product (GDP) (County Guide to Egypt 2011). Increasingly, public<br />

policy was developed that often favored the disproportionate<br />

investment and reallocation of health care resources away from<br />

the public health sector in order to fund policies that more directly<br />

supported Egypt’s tourism industry. These policies often had<br />

significant financial and ethical implications that negatively<br />

impacted the equity and distribution of Egypt’s public health<br />

resources. For example, health care services in Egypt’s urban and<br />

tourism dominant areas are far more accessible and more modern<br />

relative to the health care systems in Egypt’s lower income and<br />

rural regions. Egypt’s lower income and rural areas are typically<br />

non-tourism regions. These regions often have the highest<br />

prevalence of infectious disease and a significant lack of access<br />

and financing for its public health system (El Hadadi 2004).<br />

Furthermore, these areas typically lack the most basic public<br />

health services such as health care centers, family planning units,<br />

and hospitals (Handoussa 2008). In addition, studies indicate that<br />

more than 81 percent of Egypt’s total physician hours are provided<br />

within urban areas although they only represent less than half of<br />

Egypt’s total population (El Hadidi 2004).<br />

While Egypt is typically known as a tourist destination, it has also<br />

positioned itself as an emerging medical tourism destination<br />

particularly for cosmetic surgery. The global economic recession<br />

and the exponential increase in medical costs in many developed<br />

countries have resulted in a growing number of patients from<br />

these countries trying to identify affordable health care options for<br />

their elective and acute procedures. Therefore, an increasing<br />

World <strong>Hospital</strong>s and Health Services Vol. 47 No. 4 13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!