29.01.2014 Views

COMMISSION GEOLOGIOUE - Arkisto.gsf.fi

COMMISSION GEOLOGIOUE - Arkisto.gsf.fi

COMMISSION GEOLOGIOUE - Arkisto.gsf.fi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

36 Bulletin de la Commissioll geologique dc Finlande N: 0 212.<br />

are higher than any values reported earlier. The same holds also for the<br />

speci<strong>fi</strong>c gravity of the mineral. The piemontite from Längban, Sweden<br />

(Malmqvist 1929), and that from Chikla, India (Bilgrami 1956), have high er<br />

contents of Fe 2<br />

0 3<br />

+Mn 2<br />

0 3<br />

but the indeces are lower. The refractivity<br />

measured on those minerals must be associated with the considerably higher<br />

Mn/Fe ratio. The optical properties measured from the now analysed material<br />

do not <strong>fi</strong>t the curves drawn by Deer, Howie and Zussman (1962) because<br />

the curves do not take into account the variations in the Mn /Fe ratio. The<br />

pistasite (Ca 2<br />

FeAl 2 Si 3<br />

0 12 (OH)) - piemontite (Ca 2 MnAI 2 Si 3 0 12 (OH)) diagram<br />

of Marmo, Neuvonen and Ojanperä (1959) cannot be used for comparison<br />

since their curves take into ac count only those piemontites in which the<br />

ratio Al to (Fe+Mn) is about 2. In the mineral now analysed this ratio is<br />

as low as l.05.<br />

The unit cell dimensions determined agree weIl with those reported by<br />

Marmo, Neuvonen and Ojanperä (1959). They differ greatly, however, from<br />

the values usually listed for piemontite. The deviation cannot be explained<br />

by the difference in the choice of the monoclinic unit cello The calculated<br />

density for the pure piemontite, Ca 2<br />

Mn 2 AISi 3 0 12 (OH), is as high as 4.2 if<br />

computed according to the cell dimensions given in the hand books a = 8.05,<br />

b = 5.70, C = 9.41 and x = 115°42'). The density calculated from the<br />

dimensions now measured is 3.57 and thus agrees weIl with the density<br />

value obtained with the direct pycnometer measurements 3.5 22 . It is most<br />

likely, consequently, that there is an error in the earlier cell size determinations.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS<br />

The authors thank Sund ar Mineral (P) Ltd. for the facilities offered<br />

during the <strong>fi</strong>eld work, the Emil Aaltonen Foundation for <strong>fi</strong>nancial aid and<br />

Prof. W. D. West of Saugar University for encouragement. Thanks are<br />

also due to Mr. Paavo Väänänen of the Geological Survey of Finland for<br />

the chemical analyses and to Mr. A. Törn of the Computing Centre in Turku<br />

for his co-operation. The authors wish also to thank Messrs Erkki Marttila<br />

and Osmo Inkinen for their help in carrying out the optical and X-ray<br />

measurements. The English of the manuscript was corrected by Mr. Paul<br />

Sjöblom, M. A.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!