28.02.2014 Views

front page - tuprints - Technische Universität Darmstadt

front page - tuprints - Technische Universität Darmstadt

front page - tuprints - Technische Universität Darmstadt

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

was surface tension. These factors were related to the lamella thickness and the<br />

critical spreading velocity, which complemented each other. The non-monotonic<br />

threshold velocity for various impact angles supported this hypothesis. On the 0°<br />

target, the forward lamella was thickest, and the gas boundary layer contributed<br />

additionally to the aerodynamic force, therefore the threshold velocity was the lowest.<br />

As this effect vanished with the increasing target angle, the threshold velocity<br />

rose sharply. Further increase of the impact angle enhanced the spreading velocity,<br />

but meanwhile reduced the lamella thickness, leading to firstly a decrease of the<br />

threshold velocity from 20° to 35° of the impact angle, and a subsequent steep increase.<br />

With impact angles greater than 35°, the threshold velocity became almost<br />

constant indicating that the increase of the spreading velocity and the reduction of<br />

the lamella thickness complemented each other exactly.<br />

The velocity of the liquid jets of asymmetric splash was for the first time reported.<br />

It was found out that the velocity of the liquid jets had higher magnitudes than the<br />

impact velocity, and it increased as the impact angle increased, i.e. while approaching<br />

the normal impact. Neglecting the kinetic losses because of the short time scale,<br />

the velocity of the liquid jets was the velocity of the secondary droplets.<br />

The dynamic spreading radii were measured for the oblique impact, highlighting<br />

the asymmetric spreading of the lamella in the presence of a tangent velocity.<br />

The mass-loss was measured for the drop impact on the 0° target, in which case<br />

the secondary droplet was singular. It was found out that higher Re and We promoted<br />

mass-loss. The scaling parameter, K = We 1/2 Re 1/4 , collapsed the data on<br />

one curve. Although empirical, this parameter reflected the physics partially.<br />

6.6. Conclusion 185

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!