- Page 1 and 2:
Drop Impact on Dry Surfaces with Ph
- Page 3 and 4:
Hiermit versichere ich, die vorlieg
- Page 5 and 6:
Fachgebiet Reaktive Strömungslehre
- Page 7 and 8:
to non-monotonic threshold impact v
- Page 9 and 10:
Splash, einseitiger Splash sowie de
- Page 11 and 12:
3.4.2. Calibration of the Infrared
- Page 14 and 15: Nomenclature Latin capitals Unit A
- Page 16 and 17: k angular wavenumber rad m −1 k R
- Page 18 and 19: F G ge i K L lam m max min n opt r
- Page 20 and 21: 1 Introduction 1.1 Motivation Aircr
- Page 22 and 23: of the WCE acquired experimentally
- Page 24: passage was cooled down to −196
- Page 27 and 28: SLD icing conditions have been defi
- Page 29 and 30: −9 ◦ C and layers of freezing r
- Page 31 and 32: adjacent downstream control volume,
- Page 33 and 34: conventional methods. Papadakis et
- Page 35 and 36: Figure 2.5.: Ice horn and clear ice
- Page 37 and 38: This model showed good agreement un
- Page 39 and 40: Xu et al. proposed the following sc
- Page 41 and 42: Figure 2.9.: Splash thresholds of t
- Page 43 and 44: Chen and Wang [28] observed the dro
- Page 45 and 46: 2.14 shows. On stainless steel, tin
- Page 47 and 48: years ago [157]. Another peculiarit
- Page 49 and 50: Figure 2.17.: At an ambient pressur
- Page 51 and 52: The temperature needs to be found o
- Page 53 and 54: The Stefan number St S completely c
- Page 55 and 56: T(x, 0) = T A < T m , 0 < x < ∞ b
- Page 57 and 58: Figure 2.20: Fraction of solidifica
- Page 59 and 60: The mathematical description of the
- Page 61 and 62: asal plane. Without all these facto
- Page 66: This part reports the experimental
- Page 69 and 70: water drops achieve thermal equilib
- Page 71 and 72: The Nusselt number of a sphere in a
- Page 73 and 74: to the analytical computation in th
- Page 75 and 76: Figure 3.2.: The analytically predi
- Page 77 and 78: the tap water and the nitrogen. In
- Page 79 and 80: ing and a pinhole. The hydraulic co
- Page 81 and 82: Figure 3.7.: Pneumatic drop generat
- Page 83 and 84: Flexible Construction The intake tu
- Page 85 and 86: in Figure 3.14. Moreover the pressu
- Page 87 and 88: not listed, because it is dependent
- Page 89 and 90: As soon as the air inside the enclo
- Page 91 and 92: Figure 3.23.: A lens with 20 mm foc
- Page 93 and 94: The wettability of a surface is mea
- Page 95 and 96: 3.4.1 Challenges Accompanying the L
- Page 97 and 98: 3.31. The dot pitch of the chip is
- Page 99 and 100: Figure 3.33.: The standard derivati
- Page 101 and 102: Curved Surface If a surface is an i
- Page 103 and 104: Figure 3.38.: The orientation depen
- Page 105 and 106: Figure 3.40.: Refraction, reflectio
- Page 107 and 108: Figure 3.43.: The complex index of
- Page 109 and 110: Figure 3.45.: The penetration depth
- Page 111 and 112: This states that a semi-transparent
- Page 113 and 114:
(a) 0.00 ms (b) 1.39 ms (c) 2.79 ms
- Page 115 and 116:
The trigger for the infrared imagin
- Page 118 and 119:
4 Results and Discussion This chapt
- Page 120 and 121:
exhibited clear dependence on the s
- Page 122 and 123:
Figure 4.3.: The maximum dimensionl
- Page 124 and 125:
would be interesting for further ex
- Page 126 and 127:
(a) 0 ms (b) 0.5 ms (c) 1.75 ms (d)
- Page 128 and 129:
In the experiments with sessile liq
- Page 130 and 131:
At the 3.1 ms, one secondary “dro
- Page 132 and 133:
necessary to evaluate the response
- Page 134 and 135:
4 mm thick, several orders of magni
- Page 136 and 137:
(a) 0 ms (b) 0 ms (c) 1.39 ms (d) 1
- Page 138 and 139:
Figure 4.14.: Rime ice observed in
- Page 140:
Part II. High Speed Impact of Singl
- Page 144 and 145:
5 Experimental Setup This chapter i
- Page 146 and 147:
2.17 N, and the torque as 0.75 Nm.
- Page 148 and 149:
In summary the high-speed impact wa
- Page 150 and 151:
(a) (b) (c) (d) Figure 5.4.: The
- Page 152 and 153:
5.2.2 Satellite Drop Formation and
- Page 154 and 155:
Figure 5.8.: Frequencies of the per
- Page 156 and 157:
Figure 5.10.: Dimensionless jet bre
- Page 158 and 159:
The method was a well-known techniq
- Page 160 and 161:
where ɛ 0 = 8.854 187 817 × 10
- Page 162 and 163:
where A is the area of the plate, H
- Page 164 and 165:
Figure 5.13.: Quantity of charge me
- Page 166 and 167:
Figure 5.17.: Synchronization of th
- Page 168 and 169:
(i.e. the “low time”) was adjus
- Page 170 and 171:
spot that a point object produces,
- Page 172 and 173:
center line, where the drop landed.
- Page 174 and 175:
Spectral Response of IS-CCD Respons
- Page 176 and 177:
The position signal was received by
- Page 178 and 179:
Figure 5.27.: Experimental setup fo
- Page 180:
Figure 5.29.: The Re and We numbers
- Page 183 and 184:
Mehdizadeh et al. [83] and Pan et a
- Page 185 and 186:
eventually disintegrated from the r
- Page 187 and 188:
(a) 0 µs (b) 32 µs (c) 64 µs (d)
- Page 189 and 190:
Figure 6.7.: Outcome of oblique imp
- Page 191 and 192:
Experiment of drop diameter impact
- Page 193 and 194:
three experiment accidently lay at
- Page 195 and 196:
Figure 6.11.: Temporal variation of
- Page 197 and 198:
Figure 6.13.: Magnitudes of the vel
- Page 199 and 200:
(a) 0 µs (b) 1 µs (c) 2 µs (d) 3
- Page 201 and 202:
6.5 Mass-loss of Drop Impact on the
- Page 203 and 204:
Figure 6.18.: Mass-loss coefficient
- Page 206 and 207:
7 Summary and Outlook 7.1 Summary T
- Page 208 and 209:
The corona splash threshold require
- Page 210 and 211:
A Image Collection of High-speed Ob
- Page 212 and 213:
(a) 0 µs (b) 1 µs (c) 2 µs (d) 4
- Page 214 and 215:
A.2 60° target (a) 0 µs (b) 8 µs
- Page 216 and 217:
(a) 0 µs (b) 2 µs (c) 4 µs (d) 6
- Page 218 and 219:
A.3 45° target (a) 0 µs (b) 10 µ
- Page 220 and 221:
(a) 0 µs (b) 1 µs (c) 3 µs (d) 5
- Page 222 and 223:
A.4 30° target (a) 0 µs (b) 8 µs
- Page 224 and 225:
(a) 0 µs (b) 2 µs (c) 4 µs (d) 1
- Page 226 and 227:
A.5 15° target (a) 0 µs (b) 12 µ
- Page 228 and 229:
(a) 0 µs (b) 5 µs (c) 8 µs (d) 1
- Page 230 and 231:
A.6 10° target (a) 0 µs (b) 16 µ
- Page 232 and 233:
(a) 0 µs (b) 12 µs (c) 28 µs (d)
- Page 234 and 235:
(a) 0 µs (b) 6 µs (c) 12 µs (d)
- Page 236 and 237:
(a) 0 µs (b) 16 µs (c) 48 µs (d)
- Page 238 and 239:
(a) 0 µs (b) 12 µs (c) 20 µs (d)
- Page 240 and 241:
A.8 0° target, water, bigger drop
- Page 242 and 243:
(a) 0 µs (b) 88 µs (c) 124 µs (d
- Page 244 and 245:
A.9 0° target, water, smaller drop
- Page 246 and 247:
(a) 0 µs (b) 12 µs (c) 32 µs (d)
- Page 248 and 249:
A.10 0° target, 80% methanol (a) 0
- Page 250 and 251:
(a) 0 µs (b) 32 µs (c) 64 µs (d)
- Page 252 and 253:
B Dynamic Spreading Radius The dyna
- Page 254 and 255:
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) Figure B.3.
- Page 256 and 257:
C Supercooled Drop Impact on Super
- Page 258 and 259:
(a) 0 ms (b) 0.35 ms (c) 1 ms (d) 1
- Page 260 and 261:
List of Figures 2.1. Messinger’s
- Page 262 and 263:
2.23.The two-stage solidification o
- Page 264 and 265:
3.23.A lens with 20 mm focal length
- Page 266 and 267:
3.47.Infrared imaging of a supercoo
- Page 268 and 269:
5.2. Impact surface with different
- Page 270 and 271:
5.9. Frequencies of the perturbatio
- Page 272 and 273:
5.27.Experimental setup for high sp
- Page 274 and 275:
6.15.Measurement of the spreading r
- Page 276 and 277:
A.17.Drop diameter: 201 µm, impact
- Page 278:
A.41.Drop diameter: 165 µm, impact
- Page 282 and 283:
Bibliography [1] Fed. Aviat. Regul.
- Page 284 and 285:
[26] CARSLAW, H. S. and J. C. JAEGE
- Page 286 and 287:
[57] INGENIEURE, VEREIN DEUTSCHER,
- Page 288 and 289:
[85] MESSINGER, B. L.: Equilibrium
- Page 290 and 291:
[111] POLITOVICH, M. K., G. ZHANG,
- Page 292 and 293:
[140] STEPHAN E. BANSMER, BENJAMIN
- Page 294:
[169] YANG, J. C., W. CHIEN, M. KIN