front page - tuprints - Technische Universität Darmstadt

More documents

Recommendations

Info

(a) 0 µs (b) 12 µs (c) 32 µs (d) 52 µs (e) 60 µs (f) 84 µs Figure A.37.: Drop diameter: 135 µm, impact velocity: 33m/s, impact angle: 12°. Spatial resolution: 3.07µm/pixel, field of view: 0.96 mm × 0.80 mm, frame rate: 250 kfps. A.9. 0° target, water, smaller drop 227
(a) 0 µs (b) 10 µs (c) 22 µs (d) 34 µs (e) 50 µs (f) 58 µs (g) 66 µs (h) 74 µs (i) 102 µs Figure A.38.: Drop diameter: 134 µm, impact velocity: 43m/s, impact angle: 9°. Spatial resolution: 3.07µm/pixel, field of view: 0.96 mm × 0.80 mm, frame rate: 500 kfps. 228 A. Image Collection of High-speed Oblique Impacts
Page 1 and 2:
Drop Impact on Dry Surfaces with Ph
Page 3 and 4:
Hiermit versichere ich, die vorlieg
Page 5 and 6:
Fachgebiet Reaktive Strömungslehre
Page 7 and 8:
to non-monotonic threshold impact v
Page 9 and 10:
Splash, einseitiger Splash sowie de
Page 11 and 12:
3.4.2. Calibration of the Infrared
Page 14 and 15:
Nomenclature Latin capitals Unit A
Page 16 and 17:
k angular wavenumber rad m −1 k R
Page 18 and 19:
F G ge i K L lam m max min n opt r
Page 20 and 21:
1 Introduction 1.1 Motivation Aircr
Page 22 and 23:
of the WCE acquired experimentally
Page 24:
passage was cooled down to −196
Page 27 and 28:
SLD icing conditions have been defi
Page 29 and 30:
−9 ◦ C and layers of freezing r
Page 31 and 32:
adjacent downstream control volume,
Page 33 and 34:
conventional methods. Papadakis et
Page 35 and 36:
Figure 2.5.: Ice horn and clear ice
Page 37 and 38:
This model showed good agreement un
Page 39 and 40:
Xu et al. proposed the following sc
Page 41 and 42:
Figure 2.9.: Splash thresholds of t
Page 43 and 44:
Chen and Wang [28] observed the dro
Page 45 and 46:
2.14 shows. On stainless steel, tin
Page 47 and 48:
years ago [157]. Another peculiarit
Page 49 and 50:
Figure 2.17.: At an ambient pressur
Page 51 and 52:
The temperature needs to be found o
Page 53 and 54:
The Stefan number St S completely c
Page 55 and 56:
T(x, 0) = T A < T m , 0 < x < ∞ b
Page 57 and 58:
Figure 2.20: Fraction of solidifica
Page 59 and 60:
The mathematical description of the
Page 61 and 62:
asal plane. Without all these facto
Page 64:
Part I. Impact of Supercooled Water
Page 68 and 69:
3 Experimental Setup This chapter i
Page 70 and 71:
drop and the tube as between such t
Page 72 and 73:
of nucleation ice dendrite growth,
Page 74 and 75:
The boundary condition is then 1
Page 76 and 77:
0.021 W m −1 K −1 at −165 ◦
Page 78 and 79:
outlet of the liquid. There are two
Page 80 and 81:
The maximum depth of water in the c
Page 82 and 83:
Figure 3.11.: Pneumatic drop genera
Page 84 and 85:
Figure 3.13.: Pneumatic drop genera
Page 86 and 87:
Adjusting the Pulse Width Longer el
Page 88 and 89:
(a) Shadowgraph imaging (b) The sid
Page 90 and 91:
Figure 3.21.: The cold plate was co
Page 92 and 93:
Figure 3.25.: The transmittance of
Page 94 and 95:
eproducible. The SHS was created by
Page 96 and 97:
Figure 3.30.: Planck’s law The ot
Page 98 and 99:
Figure 3.32.: Heterogeneity of the
Page 100 and 101:
Figure 3.35.: The valid region afte
Page 102 and 103:
Divided by dΩ, Eq. 3.33 is related
Page 104 and 105:
Figure 3.39.: The wavelength depend
Page 106 and 107:
Figure 3.41.: Orientation dependenc
Page 108 and 109:
wavelength, so that the value for r
Page 110 and 111:
Temperature Gradient In light of th
Page 112 and 113:
(a) 0.00 ms (b) 1.39 ms (c) 2.79 ms
Page 114 and 115:
Figure 3.48.: Synchronization syste
Page 116:
Figure 3.50.: Experimental setup fo
Page 119 and 120:
(a) 0 ms (b) 0 ms (c) 0.6 ms (d) 0.
Page 121 and 122:
Figure 4.2.: The dynamic spreading
Page 123 and 124:
Figure 4.4.: Influence envelope of
Page 125 and 126:
(a) 0 ms (b) 0.4 ms (c) 0.8 ms (d)
Page 127 and 128:
(a) 0 ms (b) 1.39 ms (c) 2.79 ms (d
Page 129 and 130:
(a) 0 ms (b) 0.05 ms (c) 0.1 ms (d)
Page 131 and 132:
(a) −4 ◦ C, at 6.8 ms. (b) −1
Page 133 and 134:
The contact temperature is closer t
Page 135 and 136:
Obviously, the contact temperature
Page 137 and 138:
Figure 4.13.: The dimensionless min
Page 139 and 140:
always after the receding reached t
Page 142:
Part II reports the experimental in
Page 145 and 146:
to realize a high-speed rotation of
Page 147 and 148:
Figure 5.2.: Impact surface with di
Page 149 and 150:
Various such devices were developed
Page 151 and 152:
than the values reported in literat
Page 153 and 154:
Figure 5.7.: The monodisperse drop
Page 155 and 156:
This performance is a reminiscence
Page 157 and 158:
Figure 5.11.: The merging distance
Page 159 and 160:
signal and the excitation signal of
Page 161 and 162:
The analogy with a capacitor led to
Page 163 and 164:
The real situation in the applicati
Page 165 and 166:
Figure 5.15.: Static electric field
Page 167 and 168:
Figure 5.19.: Phase shift and pulse
Page 169 and 170:
disadvantage is that the number of
Page 171 and 172:
Zoom Lens Working Distance Spatial
Page 173 and 174:
the impact surface was not a sharp
Page 175 and 176:
5.5 Synchronization Both single pul
Page 177 and 178:
The last note on these two pulse tr
Page 179 and 180:
Figure 5.28.: Calculation of the im
Page 182 and 183:
6 Results and Discussion This chapt
Page 184 and 185:
(a) 0 µs (b) 2 µs (c) 4 µs (d) 6
Page 186 and 187:
high impact velocities approaching
Page 188 and 189:
(a) 32 µs (b) 84 µs (c) 100 µs F
Page 190 and 191:
(a) (b) (c) Figure 6.8.: Examinatio
Page 192 and 193:
Our observations show that the lame
Page 194 and 195:
6.3 Velocity of the Uprising Jet In
Page 196 and 197: (a) 1 µs (b) 3 µs (c) 4 µs Figur
Page 198 and 199: (a) 0 µs (b) 8 µs (c) 32 µs Figu
Page 200 and 201: (a) 45° target (b) 75° target (c)
Page 202 and 203: Nevertheless, the drop volume was e
Page 204: was surface tension. These factors
Page 207 and 208: the motion of the impinging water,
Page 209 and 210: of the single-side splash, the latt
Page 211 and 212: (a) 0 µs (b) 2 µs (c) 4 µs (d) 6
Page 217 and 218: (a) 0 µs (b) 10 µs (c) 11 µs (d)
Page 235 and 236: A.7 5° target (a) 0 µs (b) 24 µs
Page 245: (a) 0 µs (b) 20 µs (c) 40 µs (d)
Page 255 and 256: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) Figure B.4.
Page 257 and 258: (a) 0 ms (b) 0.4 ms (c) 0.5 ms (d)
Page 259 and 260: (a) 0 ms (b) 0.35 ms (c) 1 ms (d) 1
Page 261 and 262: 2.15.Prompt splash (left) was docum
Page 263 and 264: 3.12.Time t =0 corresponds to the s
Page 265 and 266: 3.31.The extension ring (left) betw
Page 267 and 268: 4.7. Infrared imaging: total reboun
Page 269 and 270: 5.5. The custom made vibrating orif
Page 271 and 272: 5.14.Static electric field between
Page 273 and 274: 6.6. Capillary wave created by the
Page 275 and 276: A.5. Drop diameter: 189 µm, impact
Page 277 and 278: A.29.Drop diameter: 203 µm, impact
Page 280: List of Tables 2.1. MVD of Freezing
Page 283 and 284: Imaging and Computer Simulations. T
Page 285 and 286: [42] GENT, R. W., N. P. DART and J.
Page 287 and 288: [70] KOROLEV, ALEXEI V., GEORGE A.
Page 289 and 290: [99] MUNDO, CHR., M. SOMMERFELD and
Page 291 and 292: [125] RYERSON, CHARLES C., GEORGE G
Page 293 and 294: [153] ŠIKALO Š., C. TROPEA and E.
Page 296:
Curriculum Vitae Personal Informati
show all

front page - tuprints - Technische Universität Darmstadt

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?