28.02.2014 Views

front page - tuprints - Technische Universität Darmstadt

front page - tuprints - Technische Universität Darmstadt

front page - tuprints - Technische Universität Darmstadt

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2.15.Prompt splash (left) was documented with heptane droplet on a<br />

glass surface with an impact velocity of 9.8m/s, while corona splash<br />

(right) was observed with an alcohol drop, reported by Pan et al. [103]. 26<br />

2.16.Snowflake photos by Wilson Bentley circa 1902. Bentley is one of<br />

the first known photographers of snowflakes. He perfected a process<br />

of catching flakes on black velvet in such a way that their images<br />

could be captured before they either melted or sublimated. These<br />

techniques used by Bentley to photograph snowflakes are essentially<br />

the same as used today. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28<br />

2.17.At an ambient pressure of 1 bar, liquid water exhibits in a number of<br />

forms. Homogeneous nucleation can be avoided by hyperquenching<br />

liquid water at extremely high cooling rates ≧1 × 10 5 K/s to temperatures<br />

below 100 K [24]. This procedure results in an amorphous<br />

form of water. When glassy water is reheated, it undergoes a glass<br />

transition at about 130 K. The region between T f and T x is called<br />

“no man’land” because it is not accessible on experimental time scale<br />

due to rapid crystallization of ice in this temperature range [93]. . . . 30<br />

2.18.Location of the ice /water interface calculated by the one-phase Stefan<br />

problem. The substrate temperature is taken as −20 ◦ C. . . . . . . 35<br />

2.19.Location of the ice/supercooled water interface calculated by the<br />

Stefan problem for the supercooled liquid. The initial temperature<br />

of the supercooled water is −10 ◦ C. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37<br />

2.20.Fraction of solidification at different supercooling. . . . . . . . . . . . . 38<br />

2.21.Applying a sinuous perturbation on the ice/water interface, designated<br />

by the solid curve, the temperature field, denoted by the<br />

dashed curves, becomes uneven. The resultant temperature gradient,<br />

represented by the spacings between the isothermal curves,<br />

manifests the stable nature of solidification without supercooling,<br />

shown on the left, and the intrinsic instability of solidification in the<br />

supercooled liquid, shown on the right. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39<br />

2.22.The growth rate of the free ice dendrite, both the theoretical prediction<br />

and the experimental measurement, is shown on the left.<br />

The morphologies of the ice dendrite formed by water of various<br />

supercooling are shown on the right: (a) −0.3 ◦ C, (b) −1 ◦ C, (c)<br />

−2 ◦ C, (d) −4 ◦ C, (e) −7 ◦ C. These data were reported by Shibkov<br />

et al. [135, 137]. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41<br />

242 List of Figures

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!