03.03.2014 Views

Readmore - Intellect Worldwide Sdn Bhd

Readmore - Intellect Worldwide Sdn Bhd

Readmore - Intellect Worldwide Sdn Bhd

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Trade Marks Journal No. 040/2010<br />

Page No. xlvi<br />

F) PERTAINING TO THE CLASSIFICATION OF GOODS AND SERVICES<br />

(I) General Information<br />

Pre-2004 Circulars<br />

(8 th Edition of the International Classification of Goods and Services, this circular was<br />

removed on 18 January 2008)<br />

Compliance with the International Classification of Goods and Services<br />

To assist the Registrar in expediting the acceptance of trade mark applications for<br />

registration, agents are reminded to ensure that the specifications of goods or services set<br />

out in the application forms conform with the International Classification of Goods and<br />

Services as far as possible. Very often, the Registrar receives applications where the marks<br />

are acceptable for registration but the specifications are not in order. This slows down the<br />

registration process.<br />

Precedents in Support of Specification<br />

In the examination of the specification of goods or services for compliance with the<br />

International Classification of Goods and Services, the Registrar is prepared to rely on<br />

precedents relating to Singapore, United Kingdom, Australia and Hong Kong registrations.<br />

Applicants and agents are therefore free to file these precedents in support of their<br />

specifications of goods and services for the Registrar's consideration.<br />

However, the Registrar would not rely on such precedents in the following situations:<br />

(a) where the precedent relates to goods or services which have been accepted by the<br />

Registrar concerned in the wrong class;<br />

(b) where the precedent relates to goods or services which are no longer classified in the<br />

class stated in the precedent in view of a change of classes by the Special Union for the<br />

International Classification of Goods and Services for the purposes of the Registration of<br />

Marks (Nice Union);<br />

(c) where the precedent relates to goods or services which are no longer classified in the<br />

class stated in the precedent in view of a change or clarification of practice by the Registry<br />

concerned.<br />

The use of square brackets [ ] and round brackets ( ) in specifications<br />

An expression between square brackets is intended to define more precisely the text or<br />

item preceding the brackets. Square brackets are used when the item is ambiguous for<br />

classification purposes. Round brackets are used to qualify the text or item preceding the<br />

brackets to ensure the correct classification. Round brackets are used when it is possible<br />

that the item can be classified in various classes depending on the intended goods or<br />

services sought to be covered.<br />

Use of the term “Internet” in specifications of goods and services<br />

In view of the widespread use of the term “Internet” in the generic sense, the Registrar will<br />

henceforth not raise any objections to the use of the term “Internet” in the specifications of<br />

goods and services of Singapore national applications or international registrations<br />

designating Singapore.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!