03.03.2014 Views

Readmore - Intellect Worldwide Sdn Bhd

Readmore - Intellect Worldwide Sdn Bhd

Readmore - Intellect Worldwide Sdn Bhd

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Trade Marks Journal No. 040/2010<br />

Page No. lxiv<br />

G) CIRCULARS RELATED TO PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE HEARINGS AND<br />

MEDIATION DIVISION<br />

HMD 2009 Circulars<br />

Applications for Security for Costs (HMD Circular No. 1/2009, dated 20 November 2009)<br />

Section 70 of the Trade Marks Act (Cap 332) 2005 Rev. Ed. provides:-<br />

If a person who neither resides nor carries on business in Singapore —<br />

(a) gives notice of opposition under section 13; or<br />

(b) applies to the Registrar under section 22 or 23 for the registration of a trade mark to be<br />

revoked or to be declared invalid, as the case may be,<br />

the Registrar may require the person to give security for the costs for the proceedings and<br />

may, if security is not given, dismiss the proceedings.<br />

[Emphasis added].<br />

It is clear from the above that the application for security for costs can be a 2 - stage<br />

process. Thus, the Registrar will deal with such applications as a 2-stage process.<br />

(I)<br />

Application for security for costs<br />

Firstly, provided that a person neither resides nor carries on business in Singapore, the<br />

Registrar then has the discretion to require a person to provide security for costs of the<br />

proceedings, but only if the Registrar thinks it is just to do so in the circumstances of the<br />

case.<br />

The factors that would be taken into consideration in deciding whether to grant security for<br />

costs in a trade mark opposition, invalidation or revocation are similar to the factors that<br />

would be taken into account in deciding whether to grant security for costs in a civil suit.<br />

Thus as provided in the Singapore Civil Procedure (“the White Book”), such factors include,<br />

amongst others:-<br />

(i)<br />

(ii)<br />

(iii)<br />

the likelihood of the opponent succeeding;<br />

whether the order for security for costs will stifle a genuine claim; and<br />

where the opponent is a limited company, whether there is any evidence that the<br />

opponent is unable to pay costs.<br />

Based on a consideration of the above, the Registrar then may or may not order security for<br />

costs to be given.<br />

(II)<br />

Application for proceedings to be dismissed<br />

In the event that the party whom the Registrar has ordered to provide security for costs fails<br />

to do so, the party to whom security for costs has been granted can then apply for the<br />

proceedings to be dismissed. The Registrar will call for submissions in writing from both<br />

parties and exercise her discretion to decide whether the proceedings should be dismissed.<br />

If parties request an interlocutory hearing to decide the issue, or if the Registrar thinks it<br />

appropriate, the Registrar may also fix an interlocutory hearing to hear the parties in person.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!