Readmore - Intellect Worldwide Sdn Bhd
Readmore - Intellect Worldwide Sdn Bhd
Readmore - Intellect Worldwide Sdn Bhd
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Trade Marks Journal No. 040/2010<br />
Page No. lxiv<br />
G) CIRCULARS RELATED TO PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE HEARINGS AND<br />
MEDIATION DIVISION<br />
HMD 2009 Circulars<br />
Applications for Security for Costs (HMD Circular No. 1/2009, dated 20 November 2009)<br />
Section 70 of the Trade Marks Act (Cap 332) 2005 Rev. Ed. provides:-<br />
If a person who neither resides nor carries on business in Singapore —<br />
(a) gives notice of opposition under section 13; or<br />
(b) applies to the Registrar under section 22 or 23 for the registration of a trade mark to be<br />
revoked or to be declared invalid, as the case may be,<br />
the Registrar may require the person to give security for the costs for the proceedings and<br />
may, if security is not given, dismiss the proceedings.<br />
[Emphasis added].<br />
It is clear from the above that the application for security for costs can be a 2 - stage<br />
process. Thus, the Registrar will deal with such applications as a 2-stage process.<br />
(I)<br />
Application for security for costs<br />
Firstly, provided that a person neither resides nor carries on business in Singapore, the<br />
Registrar then has the discretion to require a person to provide security for costs of the<br />
proceedings, but only if the Registrar thinks it is just to do so in the circumstances of the<br />
case.<br />
The factors that would be taken into consideration in deciding whether to grant security for<br />
costs in a trade mark opposition, invalidation or revocation are similar to the factors that<br />
would be taken into account in deciding whether to grant security for costs in a civil suit.<br />
Thus as provided in the Singapore Civil Procedure (“the White Book”), such factors include,<br />
amongst others:-<br />
(i)<br />
(ii)<br />
(iii)<br />
the likelihood of the opponent succeeding;<br />
whether the order for security for costs will stifle a genuine claim; and<br />
where the opponent is a limited company, whether there is any evidence that the<br />
opponent is unable to pay costs.<br />
Based on a consideration of the above, the Registrar then may or may not order security for<br />
costs to be given.<br />
(II)<br />
Application for proceedings to be dismissed<br />
In the event that the party whom the Registrar has ordered to provide security for costs fails<br />
to do so, the party to whom security for costs has been granted can then apply for the<br />
proceedings to be dismissed. The Registrar will call for submissions in writing from both<br />
parties and exercise her discretion to decide whether the proceedings should be dismissed.<br />
If parties request an interlocutory hearing to decide the issue, or if the Registrar thinks it<br />
appropriate, the Registrar may also fix an interlocutory hearing to hear the parties in person.