05.03.2014 Views

Americas and Oceania Group - International Plant Nutrition Institute

Americas and Oceania Group - International Plant Nutrition Institute

Americas and Oceania Group - International Plant Nutrition Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Results showed that mulching the soil with wheat straw or plastic film significantly increased corn yield<br />

by 6.4% or 7.2 % compared to the no mulch treatment. This further confirmed that any methods that could<br />

conserve more soil moisture <strong>and</strong> prevent soil erosion <strong>and</strong> nutrient losses could produce more corn yield on the<br />

non-irrigated sloping l<strong>and</strong>s.<br />

Among the four N sources without surface mulch, CRU produced the highest corn yield, followed by urea,<br />

calcium nitrate, <strong>and</strong> ABC. When combined with surface mulch, all N sources significantly enhanced corn<br />

yields. It is of interest that CRU <strong>and</strong> ABC were equally superior to urea <strong>and</strong> calcium nitrate on corn yields.<br />

Ammonium bicarbonate use under wheat straw mulch slightly reduced corn yield compared to ABC under<br />

plastic mulch. Ammonium bicarbonate, an inferior N source, once dominated China’s N fertilizer market,<br />

but today is of least importance, performed the best under surface mulch, indicating that different agronomic<br />

practices can affect the performance of a fertilizer considerably. By further analyzing amounts of soil erosion<br />

<strong>and</strong> nutrient losses caused by different treatments, we determined that mulching treatments significantly<br />

reduced nutrient losses through reduced soil erosion (44 to 58%) <strong>and</strong> reduced leaching or surface runoff (4.1<br />

to 20.3 mm), enhanced N uptake by corn <strong>and</strong> finally corn yields, the same trend reported in the previous<br />

years. Sichuan-BFDP-09<br />

Response of Chinese Cabbage to Different Timings of Fertilizer Application in Chongqing<br />

Project Leader: Zhengyin Wang, Southwest University Agricultural Resources <strong>and</strong> Environment Beibei District<br />

Chongqing, Chongqing. E-mail: wang_zhengyin@163.com<br />

Traditionally, P <strong>and</strong> K fertilizers are used as basal application to most crops, if not all. It is unclear what<br />

extra benefit would accrue when these two fertilizer are used in split applications at different growth stages of<br />

a crop. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the effect of split application of P <strong>and</strong> K along with N fertilizers<br />

on yield <strong>and</strong> quality of Chinese cabbage in Chongqing, China in 2011. There were six fertilizer treatments<br />

combining equal rates, but different timings, of N as urea, P as mono-potassium phosphate, <strong>and</strong> K as KCl<br />

at 300-90-150 kg N-P 2 O 5 -K 2 O/ha. The six treatments included: (1) the conventional timing of fertilizer<br />

application (i.e. 100% of P <strong>and</strong> K fertilizers applied basally, N fertilizer split between basal <strong>and</strong> top dressing<br />

at rosette, cupping, <strong>and</strong> the fast growing stage; (2) N <strong>and</strong> P fertilizers split using the above mentioned stages<br />

<strong>and</strong> only K fertilizer was applied basally; (3) N <strong>and</strong> K fertilizers were split as above <strong>and</strong> only P fertilizer<br />

applied basally; (4-6) all N, P, <strong>and</strong> K fertilizers were split in above mentioned stages, but with three different<br />

allocation percentages.<br />

Results showed that at the same N, P, <strong>and</strong> K fertilizer rates, the conventional timing of fertilizer application<br />

produced the least cabbage yield, while the treatment splitting N, P, <strong>and</strong> K fertilizers basally at 20% N, 30%<br />

P 2 O 5 , 30% K 2 O, <strong>and</strong> topdressing only at rosette stage at 40% N 40%, 30% P 2 O 5 , 30% K 2 O <strong>and</strong> cupping stage<br />

at 40% N, 40% P 2 O 5 , 40% K 2 O produced significantly higher yield than the other treatments. All the other<br />

treatments had the similar yield level with non-significant differences. Further, all the splitting treatments<br />

enhanced quality parameters by 2 to 5% for vitamin C, 13 to 33% for reducing sugar, 3 to 28% for amino<br />

acids, <strong>and</strong> 0 to 26 % of reduction for nitrate N compared to the conventional timing of fertilization. The<br />

highest yield treatment also improved the cabbage quality by enhancing contents of vitamin C <strong>and</strong> reducing<br />

nitrate N in the leaf head, slightly decreasing reducing sugar <strong>and</strong> amino acids compared to the other splitting<br />

treatments. Chongqing-BFDP-11-01<br />

Response of Maize under Plastic Mulch to Controlled Release Urea (CRU) in Yunnan<br />

Project Leader: Lifang Hong, Yunnan Academy of Agrocultural Sciences Soil <strong>and</strong> Fertilizer <strong>Institute</strong>, Kunming,<br />

Yunnan. E-mail: gredbean@163.com<br />

Project Cooperator: Mei Yong<br />

The majority of field controlled-release urea (CRU) experiments conducted on maize in recent years were<br />

arranged in north China where 80% of maize in China is grown. In 2011, a field experiment was carried out<br />

in Yunnan, a big maize producer in south China, to investigate performance of CRU in a high fertility sloping<br />

l<strong>and</strong> soil under plastic mulch in humid climate with irregular drought spells in summer. The experiment<br />

included four N rates (0, 105, 157.5, <strong>and</strong> 210 kg N/ha) replicated three times. Each rate of N was tested as<br />

paired CRU <strong>and</strong> regular urea (RU) treatments for strict comparison of CRU effect. Two split N treatments<br />

were also included, one with 40% RU basal at seeding <strong>and</strong> 60% as a top-dressing 53 days after seeding,<br />

compared with 40% RU <strong>and</strong> 60% CRU both applied basal at seeding. All treatments received equal rates of P<br />

<strong>and</strong> K fertilizers that were used as basal application.<br />

Results indicated that all the CRU treatments produced higher maize yields compared to its counterpart RU<br />

treatments. The yield increase, however, was not statistically significant, except the CRU versus RU at the full<br />

N rate (210 kg N/ha). Maize yields were increased with an increase in N rates <strong>and</strong> leveled off at 157.5 kg N/<br />

IPNI Interpretive Summaries 65

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!