05.03.2014 Views

Americas and Oceania Group - International Plant Nutrition Institute

Americas and Oceania Group - International Plant Nutrition Institute

Americas and Oceania Group - International Plant Nutrition Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Nutrient Expert-based Fertilizer Recommendations for Winter Wheat <strong>and</strong> Spring Maize in Henan<br />

Project Leader: Kegang Sun, Henen Academy of Agricultural Sciences Soil <strong>and</strong> Fertilizer <strong>Institute</strong>, Zhengzhou, Henan.<br />

E-mail: kgsun@371.net, kgsun@ppi.caas.ac.cn<br />

Project Cooperator: Bingqi Li<br />

This study was conducted to validate Nutrient Expert (NE)-based fertilizer recommendations for winter<br />

wheat <strong>and</strong> spring maize in farmer fields <strong>and</strong> compare them with farmer fertilizer practice (FFP). For this,<br />

thirty (30) on-farm experiments were conducted for wheat <strong>and</strong> 12 for maize in Zhumadian, Henan province.<br />

NE-based fertilizer recommendation plots received on average 154-78-79 kg N-P 2 O 5 -K 2 O/ha for wheat <strong>and</strong><br />

150-50-62 kg N-P 2 O 5 -K 2 O/ha for maize, respectively, while farmer fertilizer practice (FFP) plots received<br />

an average of 249-119-119 kg N-P 2 O 5 -K 2 O/ha for wheat <strong>and</strong> 206-15-15 kg N-P 2 O 5 -K 2 O/ha for maize,<br />

respectively.<br />

First year results of the study showed that grain yields <strong>and</strong> profits in NE were both higher than those in FFP<br />

treatments. However, significantly higher agronomic efficiency of N (16.6 kg/kg for wheat <strong>and</strong> 18.4 kg/kg for<br />

maize), N recovery efficiency (52.9% for wheat <strong>and</strong> 43.0% for maize), <strong>and</strong> partial factor productivity (52.0<br />

kg/kg for wheat <strong>and</strong> 53.0 kg/kg for maize) were obtained using NE-based fertilizer recommendations than<br />

using FFP, where the corresponding FFP values were 9.7 kg/kg <strong>and</strong> 12.7 kg/kg, 18.6% <strong>and</strong> 25.2%, <strong>and</strong> 31.5<br />

kg/kg <strong>and</strong> 38 kg/kg for wheat <strong>and</strong> maize, respectively. With NE, 38.2% <strong>and</strong> 25.2% less fertilizer N was used<br />

than that used in FFP for wheat <strong>and</strong> maize, respectively. The study demonstrated that NE was an effective<br />

fertilizer recommendation method in Henan. Henan-NMBF<br />

Global Maize Project in China: Dahe, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province<br />

Project Leader: Mengchao Liu, <strong>Institute</strong> of Agricultural Resources <strong>and</strong> Environment Hebei Academy of Agricultural<br />

Sciences. E-mail: lmchao1758@sohu.com<br />

Project Cooperator: Chunjie Li<br />

This long-term experiment was initiated in June 2009 in Hebei province. Summer maize was the first<br />

crop grown at this site, where winter wheat-summer maize rotation system is common. The main plot had<br />

two treatments: a) ecological intensification (EI) treatment with 120-60-80 kg N-P 2 O 5 -K 2 O/ha fertilizer<br />

application in winter wheat <strong>and</strong> 150-40-50 kg N-P 2 O 5 -K 2 O/ha in summer maize; <strong>and</strong> b) farmer practice<br />

(FP) treatment with 225-120-50 kg N-P 2 O 5 -K 2 O/ha fertilizer application in winter wheat <strong>and</strong> 300-135-0 kg<br />

N-P 2 O 5 -K 2 O/ha in summer maize. Three subplots included: a) N applied in all 3 years (N all yr), b) N applied<br />

in 2 of every 3 years (N 2/3 yr), <strong>and</strong> c) no N applied (N 0 yr). Winter wheat was planted on October 19,<br />

2010 <strong>and</strong> harvested on June 18, 2011, while summer maize (storage maize) was planted in the same plots on<br />

August 20, 2011 <strong>and</strong> harvested on October 12, 2011.<br />

No significant difference in grain yields was found between EI <strong>and</strong> FP treatments for winter wheat,<br />

although higher N <strong>and</strong> P were applied in FP. However, agronomic N efficiency (kg grain yield increase per kg<br />

N applied) was higher in the EI treatment (13.3 kg/kg) than in the FP treatment (9.4 kg/kg). Similarly, partial<br />

factor productivity of N (kg grain yield per kg N applied) was considerably higher in the EI treatment (67.3<br />

kg/kg) than in the FP treatment (37.7 kg/kg). Similar trends for grain yield <strong>and</strong> N use efficiencies were found<br />

in summer maize. N 2/3 yr treatment produced yields similar to N all yr treatment. This demonstrated that<br />

skipping N application in two seasons did not affect the grain yield during the third maize growing season.<br />

IPNI-21 v<br />

82 IPNI Interpretive Summaries

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!