05.03.2014 Views

IPR - Institute for Policy Research - Northwestern University

IPR - Institute for Policy Research - Northwestern University

IPR - Institute for Policy Research - Northwestern University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Q<br />

uantitative Methods<br />

<strong>for</strong> <strong>Policy</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />

Most researchers and academics tend to stick with the research methods they know best, learned<br />

mainly in graduate school—even though those methods might not represent current best practices or<br />

the most appropriate method. This is why statistician and education researcher Larry Hedges, with<br />

the support of a group of distinguished interdisciplinary scholars, launched the Center <strong>for</strong> Improving<br />

Methods <strong>for</strong> Quantitative <strong>Policy</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, or Q-Center, at the <strong>Institute</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Policy</strong> <strong>Research</strong>. Hedges<br />

co-directs the center with social psychologist Thomas D. Cook. Q-Center faculty work on:<br />

• improving designs, analysis, and synthesis in policy research<br />

• designing better research methods <strong>for</strong> education<br />

• fostering a community of scholars<br />

• developing new data sources and methods of data collection<br />

Overview of Activities<br />

< Partial Knowledge and Identification<br />

Charles F. Manski, Board of Trustees Professor<br />

in Economics, continues his original work on the<br />

difficulties of selecting the best policy with limited<br />

knowledge of policy impacts, which he expounded in<br />

two books, most recently in Identification <strong>for</strong> Prediction<br />

and Decision (Harvard <strong>University</strong> Press, 2007).<br />

< Response Errors in Survey <strong>Research</strong><br />

Manski and Francesca Molinari of Cornell <strong>University</strong><br />

are also working on nonresponse and response errors in<br />

survey research. They hope to improve the researchers’<br />

ability to use data from the Health and Retirement<br />

Study (HRS) by recognizing that some respondent<br />

records are incomplete and possibly error-ridden and<br />

then extend their findings to general survey research.<br />

The two researchers are analyzing HRS data to see<br />

whether they can improve assessment of data quality.<br />

In particular, they want to learn whether certain types<br />

of respondents in large-scale surveys such as the HRS<br />

systematically tend to provide inaccurate or incomplete<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation. Most recently, they addressed the use of<br />

skip sequencing, in which respondents are only asked<br />

a certain question or series of questions based on their<br />

response to a broad, opening question. Manski and<br />

Molinari consider various predictions of nonresponse<br />

and response errors, outlining the situations in which<br />

skip sequencing works best. They published their<br />

findings in the Annals of Applied Statistics.<br />

Co-Chairs<br />

Thomas D. Cook (l.), Psychology, and Larry<br />

Hedges, Statistics/Education and Social <strong>Policy</strong><br />

Q-Center faculty conduct research relevant to the<br />

center’s mission of improving designs, data collection,<br />

analysis, and synthesis in social policy research.<br />

41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!