05.03.2014 Views

IPR - Institute for Policy Research - Northwestern University

IPR - Institute for Policy Research - Northwestern University

IPR - Institute for Policy Research - Northwestern University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>IPR</strong><br />

at 40<br />

Druckman, J. 2008. Dynamic approaches to studying<br />

parliamentary coalitions. Political <strong>Research</strong> Quarterly 61(3):<br />

479–83.<br />

Alice Eagly<br />

Eagly, A., and A. Koenig. 2008. On the risks of occupying<br />

incongruent roles. In Beyond Common Sense: Psychological<br />

Science in the Courtroom, ed. E. Borgida and S. Fiske,<br />

63–81. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Publishing.<br />

Eagly, A. 2008. A career on the interdisciplinary divide:<br />

Reflections on the challenges of bridging the psychological<br />

and the social. In Journeys in Social Psychology: Looking<br />

Back to Inspire the Future, ed. A. Rodrigues, R. Levine, and<br />

L. Zelezny, 55–68. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum Associates.<br />

Bosak, J., S. Sczesny, and A. Eagly. 2008. Communion<br />

and agency judgments of women and men as a function of<br />

role in<strong>for</strong>mation and response <strong>for</strong>mat. European Journal of<br />

Social Psychology 38(7): 1148–55.<br />

Diekman, A., and A. Eagly. 2008. Of women, men, and<br />

motivation: A role congruity account. In Handbook of<br />

Motivational Science, ed. J. Shah and W. Gardner, 434–47.<br />

New York: Guil<strong>for</strong>d Press.<br />

López-Zafra, E., R. García-Retamero, A. Diekman, and A.<br />

Eagly. 2008. Dynamics of gender stereotypes and power: A<br />

cross-cultural study. Revista de Psicología Social 23(2): 213–19.<br />

Rankin, L., and A. Eagly. 2008. Is his heroism hailed and<br />

hers hidden? Women, men, and the social construction of<br />

heroism. Psychology of Women Quarterly 32(4): 414–22.<br />

Jeremy Freese<br />

Freese, J. 2008. Genetics and the social science explanation<br />

of individual outcomes. American Journal of Sociology<br />

114(S1): S1–S35.<br />

Freese, J. 2008. The problem of predictive promiscuity<br />

in deductive applications of evolutionary reasoning to<br />

intergenerational transfers: Three cautionary tales. In<br />

Caring and Exchange Within and Across Generations, ed.<br />

A. Booth, A. Crouter, S. Bianchi, and J. Seltzer, 45–78.<br />

Washington, D.C.: Urban <strong>Institute</strong> Press.<br />

Cadge, W., J. Freese, and N. Christakis. 2008. The<br />

provision of hospital chaplaincy in the United States:<br />

A national overview. Southern Medical Journal 101(6):<br />

626–30.<br />

Larry V. Hedges<br />

Hedges, L. V., and J. Hanis-Martin. 2008. Can nonrandomized<br />

studies provide evidence of causal effects?<br />

A case study using the regression-discontinuity design. In<br />

Education <strong>Research</strong> on Trial: <strong>Policy</strong> Re<strong>for</strong>m and the Call <strong>for</strong><br />

Scientific Rigor, ed. P. Barnhouse Walters, A. Lareau, and S.<br />

Rains, 105–24. New York: Routledge.<br />

Hedges, L. V. 2008. What are effect sizes, and why do we<br />

need them? Child Development Perspectives 2(3): 167–71.<br />

Konstantopoulos, S., and L. V. Hedges. 2008. How large<br />

an effect can we expect from school re<strong>for</strong>ms? Teachers<br />

College Record 110(8): 1611–38.<br />

Shadish, W. R., D. M. Rindskopf, and L. V. Hedges. 2008.<br />

The state of the science in the meta-analysis of single-case<br />

experimental designs. Evidence-Based Communication<br />

Assessment and Intervention 2(3): 188–96.<br />

Christopher Kuzawa<br />

Kuzawa C., P. Gluckman, M. Hanson, and A. Beedle.<br />

2008. Evolution, developmental plasticity, and metabolic<br />

disease. In Evolution in Health and Disease, 2nd ed., ed.<br />

S. Stearns and J. Koella, 253–64. New York: Ox<strong>for</strong>d<br />

<strong>University</strong> Press.<br />

“<br />

The years ahead will yield increased understanding of the biological mechanisms of genomic causation,<br />

and sociology needs to complement this by articulating the social mechanisms that cause genetic differences<br />

to be more or less relevant. Sociologists should not feel that our enterprise is diminished by findings that genetic<br />

differences are causally related to differences in the individual outcomes we study.<br />

”<br />

Freese, J. 2008. Genetics and the social science explanation of individual outcomes. American Journal of Sociology<br />

114(S1): S1–S35 (pp. S28–29).<br />

57

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!