09.03.2014 Views

2011-2012 - The Italian Academy - Columbia University

2011-2012 - The Italian Academy - Columbia University

2011-2012 - The Italian Academy - Columbia University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Lorenza Miretti<br />

<strong>The</strong> main object of my research at the <strong>Italian</strong> <strong>Academy</strong> (which I’m<br />

going to publish) was to highlight the role played by Futurist literature<br />

in the establishment of contemporary society from a scientific<br />

point of view.<br />

I studied Filippo Tommaso Marinetti’s first novel, Mafarka the<br />

Futurist (1909), which brought a charge of “offense against decency”<br />

against the author because of some erotic passages. <strong>The</strong> novel tells<br />

the story of the African prince Mafarka-el-Bar who, after bringing<br />

down his usurper uncle, renounces everything to create a son of his<br />

own, the mechanical and immortal Gazourmah, the prototype of<br />

the Futurist hero.<br />

In 2005, I had already proved that Mafarka the Futurist is a<br />

deeply camouflaged transposition of the Ulysses myth, and that<br />

Marinetti built Futurism on the myth of Ulysses, despite his proclaimed<br />

condemnation of tradition. I also proved that the events<br />

common to both the story of Mafarka and the story of Ulysses are<br />

concentrated for the most part in chapters I to IX (the remaining<br />

chapters, X-XII, tell of Gazurmah’s birth), and that the number and<br />

type of the similarities make it impossible to attribute to chance the<br />

use of the Ulysses myth in Mafarka.<br />

On the basis of an interview with a journalist for the Petit Marseillais<br />

in 1904, in which Marinetti mentioned that his African novel<br />

was nearly finished, some might object that he wrote the chapters<br />

connected with Ulysses’ story before founding Futurism (with the<br />

publication in 1909 of the Futurist Manifesto), and then he reused<br />

those chapters by including them in a new Futurist novel.<br />

This would be possible if the last chapters were completely free<br />

of classical references. But—during my stay at the <strong>Italian</strong> <strong>Academy</strong>—I<br />

was able to find the philological evidence of the presence of classical<br />

traces in the final chapters, and to conclude that the whole novel is<br />

characterized by a reutilization of classical myths: there is not a clear<br />

division between some pre-Futuristic chapters clearly devoted to the<br />

Ulysses myth and the final ones in which the author abandons the<br />

classical hero in favor of the modern Futurist hero, Gazourmah.<br />

Given that Marinetti set his novel against the mores of his time<br />

| 52

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!