12.03.2014 Views

History Making and Present Day Politics - Stolten's African Studies ...

History Making and Present Day Politics - Stolten's African Studies ...

History Making and Present Day Politics - Stolten's African Studies ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

h i s t o r y m a k i n g a n d p r e s e n t d a y p o l i t i c s<br />

the funding of heritage sites <strong>and</strong> certain people from the business world in<br />

need of absolution for their earlier de facto apartheid support.<br />

Martin Murray’s article “Urban space, architectural design, <strong>and</strong> the disruption<br />

of historical memory” is a piece of penetrating research in present<br />

South <strong>African</strong> city architecture seen from a historical viewpoint.<br />

In the aftermath of the 1994 change of power, propertied urban residents<br />

have in ever-increasing numbers retreated behind fortifications, barriers, <strong>and</strong><br />

walls. Fortified enclaves of all sorts have resulted in the privatisation of public<br />

space. The creation of themed entertainment destinations, like heritage theme<br />

parks, has produced new kinds of congregating, social spaces that are, in the<br />

classical liberal sense, neither fully public nor private. Whereas the historical<br />

lines of cleavage during the apartheid era typically crystallised around the<br />

extremes of white affluence <strong>and</strong> black impoverishment, the new divisions go<br />

h<strong>and</strong> in h<strong>and</strong> with a post-apartheid rhetoric that in Murray’s view has been<br />

transformed into a defence of privilege <strong>and</strong> social status despite the egalitarian<br />

discourses of non-racialist nation-building <strong>and</strong> rainbowism. Taken together,<br />

these practices have led to new forms of exclusion, <strong>and</strong> separation.<br />

Murray’s paper reveals the social functions of enclosed institutions like the<br />

Waterfront that are made apparently inclusive by the use of cultural heritage.<br />

The article unmasks how the use of invented traditions in styled cocooned<br />

areas can disguise the meaning of class stratification.<br />

Conflicting views of history<br />

As the first contribution in Part Three of this book, dealing with differing interpretations<br />

of South <strong>African</strong> history, Bernhard Magubane’s article “Whose<br />

memory – whose history” argues that colonial history writing was deliberately<br />

constructed to justify genocidal wars. 101 After 1910, when the fact of conquest<br />

had been firmly established, new methods were, in Magubane’s view, used to<br />

reduce black people to objects. The crude racism of Theal was replaced by a<br />

liberal discourse that used much energy to explore whether the policies of segregation<br />

were compatible with capitalist growth. 102 After the Second World<br />

101. This could be true for writings like: Theal, George M., South Africa, London,<br />

George Allen & Unwin Ltd; Theal, George McCall, Records of the Cape Colony, 36<br />

vol., printed for the Government of the Cape Colony, London, 1897–1905.<br />

102. Even if it is debatable if Macmillan was a classical liberal, his work should be viewed<br />

as important for this approach. Macmillan, William M., Complex South Africa. An<br />

Economic Footnote to <strong>History</strong>, London, Faber <strong>and</strong> Faber, 1930.<br />

34

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!