15.03.2014 Views

SAC Publication Digest - May 2005 - Justice Research and Statistics ...

SAC Publication Digest - May 2005 - Justice Research and Statistics ...

SAC Publication Digest - May 2005 - Justice Research and Statistics ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

were chosen based on characteristics such as location, populations, <strong>and</strong> poverty level, <strong>and</strong> focus<br />

groups were conducted in each county. Participation was voluntary <strong>and</strong> a total of 22<br />

individuals took part in the focus groups. Participants frequently mentioned that location <strong>and</strong><br />

economic condition made it difficult to seek services, <strong>and</strong> some expressed negative feelings<br />

about the criminal justice system. A large number of the focus group participants had used<br />

counseling services.<br />

PENNSYLVANIA<br />

EVALUATION OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND SEXUAL ABUSE SCREENING BY<br />

PRIMARY CARE PRACTITIONERS<br />

W<strong>and</strong>a Filer, Valerie Campbell, <strong>and</strong> Sally Cavanaugh<br />

January 2004, 51 pp.<br />

This study examines the rates of sexual abuse <strong>and</strong> domestic violence screening by healthcare<br />

providers both before <strong>and</strong> after the introduction of practice guidelines/requirements <strong>and</strong><br />

educational interventions. Patient records at 10 suburban primary care practices were reviewed<br />

for screening. Documentation of domestic violence screening was found to vary across practices<br />

<strong>and</strong> by reason for patient visit. Sexual assault screening documentation occurred less than<br />

domestic violence screening, but in the cases in which it did occur, abuse was found more often<br />

(1 in 3) than in cases screened for domestic violence (1 in 12).<br />

EVALUATION OF PENNSYLVANIA’S PROTECTION FROM ABUSE DATABASE<br />

Brenda K. Uekert, Penney Wentl<strong>and</strong>, Susan Keilitz, <strong>and</strong> Tracy Peters<br />

October 2004, 23 pp.<br />

This report presents an evaluation of the Protection From Abuse Database. The study focuses on<br />

PFAD usage, satisfaction levels, victim safety, data transmission, <strong>and</strong> system integration. Data<br />

were collected through secondary data analysis, county-level surveys, user surveys, case<br />

studies, <strong>and</strong> system analysis. Findings indicate that PFAD users are highly satisfied, that the<br />

system meets their needs, <strong>and</strong> they recommend it to others in their positions. However, most<br />

users aren’t aware of or don’t take advantage of the full range of the database functions <strong>and</strong><br />

capabilities. There were variations across the state in terms of the timeliness <strong>and</strong> accuracy of<br />

information being entered. The system is most commonly used to propose temporary orders,<br />

initiate petitions, create notices or hearings, edit proposed orders, <strong>and</strong> prepare final orders.<br />

Fifty-five counties are using or being trained to use PFAD.<br />

WEST VIRGINIA<br />

WEST VIRGINIA STOP VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN PROJECT EVALUATION<br />

Erica Turley <strong>and</strong> Stephen M. Haas<br />

March 2004, 34 pp.<br />

This report details the number <strong>and</strong> characteristics of victims served by the STOP (Services,<br />

16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!