27.03.2014 Views

uniform trust code - Kansas Judicial Branch

uniform trust code - Kansas Judicial Branch

uniform trust code - Kansas Judicial Branch

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

21<br />

22<br />

23<br />

24<br />

25<br />

26<br />

27<br />

28<br />

29<br />

30<br />

31<br />

32<br />

33<br />

34<br />

35<br />

that were not properly incurred in the administration of the <strong>trust</strong>.<br />

(b) An advance by the <strong>trust</strong>ee of money for the protection of the <strong>trust</strong> gives rise to<br />

a lien against <strong>trust</strong> property to secure reimbursement with reasonable interest.<br />

<strong>Kansas</strong> Comment<br />

Subsection (a)(1) conforms to <strong>Kansas</strong> law. See K.S.A. 59-1717 (<strong>trust</strong>ee shall be<br />

allowed his or her necessary expenses incurred in the execution of the <strong>trust</strong>); Morrison v. Watkins,<br />

20 Kan. App. 2d 411, Syl. 12, 889 P.2d 140 (1995) (award of costs is mandatory, conditioned upon<br />

good faith of <strong>trust</strong>ee).<br />

Subsection (a)(2) is new. The <strong>Kansas</strong> Court of Appeals has held that a <strong>trust</strong>ee may<br />

recover expenses incurred in successfully defending actions taken while <strong>trust</strong>ee although he is no<br />

longer a <strong>trust</strong>ee when the expenses are incurred. Morrison, 20 Kan. App. 2d 411, Syl. 11. See also<br />

Jennings v. Murdock, 220 Kan. 182, Syl. 16, 553 P.2d 846 (1976) (<strong>trust</strong>ee who successfully defends<br />

itself against efforts to remove it is entitled to be reimbursed from the <strong>trust</strong> estate for the expenses<br />

of making its defense).<br />

Subsection (b) is codified in K.S.A. 58-1203(c)(18).<br />

UTC Comment<br />

A <strong>trust</strong>ee has the authority to expend <strong>trust</strong> funds as necessary in the administration of the<br />

<strong>trust</strong>, including expenses incurred in the hiring of agents. See Sections 807 (delegation by <strong>trust</strong>ee)<br />

and 816(15) (<strong>trust</strong>ee to pay expenses of administration from <strong>trust</strong>).<br />

Subsection (a)(1) clarifies that a <strong>trust</strong>ee is entitled to reimbursement from the <strong>trust</strong> for<br />

incurring expenses within the <strong>trust</strong>ee’s authority. The <strong>trust</strong>ee may also withhold appropriate<br />

reimbursement for expenses before making distributions to the beneficiaries. See Restatement<br />

(Third) of Trusts § 38 cmt. b (Tentative Draft No. 2, approved 1999); Restatement (Second) of<br />

Trusts § 244 cmt. b (1959). A <strong>trust</strong>ee is ordinarily not entitled to reimbursement for incurring<br />

unauthorized expenses. Such expenses are normally the personal responsibility of the <strong>trust</strong>ee.<br />

As provided in subsection (a)(2), a <strong>trust</strong>ee is entitled to reimbursement for unauthorized<br />

expenses only if the unauthorized expenditures benefitted the <strong>trust</strong> The purpose of this provision,<br />

which is derived from Restatement (Second) of Trusts § 245 (1959), is not to ratify the unauthorized<br />

conduct of the <strong>trust</strong>ee, but to prevent unjust enrichment of the <strong>trust</strong>. Given this purpose, a court, on<br />

appropriate grounds, may delay or even deny reimbursement for expenses which benefitted the <strong>trust</strong>.<br />

Appropriate grounds include: (1) whether the <strong>trust</strong>ee acted in bad faith in incurring the expense; (2)<br />

whether the <strong>trust</strong>ee knew that the expense was inappropriate; (3) whether the <strong>trust</strong>ee reasonably<br />

believed the expense was necessary for the preservation of the <strong>trust</strong> estate; (4) whether the expense<br />

has resulted in a benefit; and (5) whether indemnity can be allowed without defeating or impairing<br />

131

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!