27.03.2014 Views

uniform trust code - Kansas Judicial Branch

uniform trust code - Kansas Judicial Branch

uniform trust code - Kansas Judicial Branch

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

The duty to act impartially does not mean that the <strong>trust</strong>ee must treat the beneficiaries equally.<br />

Rather, the <strong>trust</strong>ee must treat the beneficiaries equitably in light of the purposes and terms of the<br />

<strong>trust</strong>. A settlor who prefers that the <strong>trust</strong>ee, when making decisions, generally favor the interests of<br />

one beneficiary over those of others should provide appropriate guidance in the terms of the <strong>trust</strong>.<br />

See Restatement (Second) of § 183 cmt. a (1959).<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

21<br />

22<br />

23<br />

24<br />

25<br />

26<br />

27<br />

28<br />

29<br />

30<br />

SECTION 804. PRUDENT ADMINISTRATION. A <strong>trust</strong>ee shall administer the <strong>trust</strong> as<br />

a prudent person would, by considering the purposes, terms, distributional requirements, and other<br />

circumstances of the <strong>trust</strong>. In satisfying this standard, the <strong>trust</strong>ee shall exercise reasonable care,<br />

skill, and caution.<br />

<strong>Kansas</strong> Comment<br />

This section conforms to <strong>Kansas</strong> law. See K.S.A. 58-1202(c) (unless <strong>trust</strong> instrument states<br />

otherwise, prudent investor rule is standard for exercise of <strong>trust</strong>ee powers); Pizel v. Whalen, 252<br />

Kan. 384, 390, 845 P.2d 37 (1993) (standard of care, diligence, and skill required of <strong>trust</strong>ee in the<br />

administration of the <strong>trust</strong> estate is that of a prudent man).<br />

UTC Comment<br />

The duty to administer a <strong>trust</strong> with prudence is a fundamental duty of the <strong>trust</strong>ee. This duty<br />

does not depend on whether the <strong>trust</strong>ee receives compensation. The duty may be altered by the<br />

terms of the <strong>trust</strong>. See Section 105. This section is similar to Section 2(a) of the Uniform Prudent<br />

Investor Act and Restatement (Third) of Trusts: Prudent Investor Rule § 227 (1992).<br />

The language of this section diverges from the language of the previous Restatement. The<br />

prior Restatement can be read as applying the same standard – “man of ordinary prudence would<br />

exercise in dealing with his own property” – regardless of the type or purposes of the <strong>trust</strong>. See<br />

Restatement (Second) of Trusts § 174 cmt. a (1959). This section appropriately bases the standard<br />

on the purposes and other circumstances of the particular <strong>trust</strong>.<br />

A settlor who wishes to modify the standard of care specified in this section is free to do so,<br />

but there is a limit. Section 1008 prohibits a settlor from exculpating a <strong>trust</strong>ee from liability for<br />

breach of <strong>trust</strong> committed in bad faith or with reckless indifference to the purposes of the <strong>trust</strong> or<br />

to the interests of the beneficiaries.<br />

31<br />

SECTION 805. COSTS OF ADMINISTRATION. In administering a <strong>trust</strong>, the <strong>trust</strong>ee<br />

143

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!