uniform trust code - Kansas Judicial Branch
uniform trust code - Kansas Judicial Branch
uniform trust code - Kansas Judicial Branch
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6<br />
The duty to act impartially does not mean that the <strong>trust</strong>ee must treat the beneficiaries equally.<br />
Rather, the <strong>trust</strong>ee must treat the beneficiaries equitably in light of the purposes and terms of the<br />
<strong>trust</strong>. A settlor who prefers that the <strong>trust</strong>ee, when making decisions, generally favor the interests of<br />
one beneficiary over those of others should provide appropriate guidance in the terms of the <strong>trust</strong>.<br />
See Restatement (Second) of § 183 cmt. a (1959).<br />
7<br />
8<br />
9<br />
10<br />
11<br />
12<br />
13<br />
14<br />
15<br />
16<br />
17<br />
18<br />
19<br />
20<br />
21<br />
22<br />
23<br />
24<br />
25<br />
26<br />
27<br />
28<br />
29<br />
30<br />
SECTION 804. PRUDENT ADMINISTRATION. A <strong>trust</strong>ee shall administer the <strong>trust</strong> as<br />
a prudent person would, by considering the purposes, terms, distributional requirements, and other<br />
circumstances of the <strong>trust</strong>. In satisfying this standard, the <strong>trust</strong>ee shall exercise reasonable care,<br />
skill, and caution.<br />
<strong>Kansas</strong> Comment<br />
This section conforms to <strong>Kansas</strong> law. See K.S.A. 58-1202(c) (unless <strong>trust</strong> instrument states<br />
otherwise, prudent investor rule is standard for exercise of <strong>trust</strong>ee powers); Pizel v. Whalen, 252<br />
Kan. 384, 390, 845 P.2d 37 (1993) (standard of care, diligence, and skill required of <strong>trust</strong>ee in the<br />
administration of the <strong>trust</strong> estate is that of a prudent man).<br />
UTC Comment<br />
The duty to administer a <strong>trust</strong> with prudence is a fundamental duty of the <strong>trust</strong>ee. This duty<br />
does not depend on whether the <strong>trust</strong>ee receives compensation. The duty may be altered by the<br />
terms of the <strong>trust</strong>. See Section 105. This section is similar to Section 2(a) of the Uniform Prudent<br />
Investor Act and Restatement (Third) of Trusts: Prudent Investor Rule § 227 (1992).<br />
The language of this section diverges from the language of the previous Restatement. The<br />
prior Restatement can be read as applying the same standard – “man of ordinary prudence would<br />
exercise in dealing with his own property” – regardless of the type or purposes of the <strong>trust</strong>. See<br />
Restatement (Second) of Trusts § 174 cmt. a (1959). This section appropriately bases the standard<br />
on the purposes and other circumstances of the particular <strong>trust</strong>.<br />
A settlor who wishes to modify the standard of care specified in this section is free to do so,<br />
but there is a limit. Section 1008 prohibits a settlor from exculpating a <strong>trust</strong>ee from liability for<br />
breach of <strong>trust</strong> committed in bad faith or with reckless indifference to the purposes of the <strong>trust</strong> or<br />
to the interests of the beneficiaries.<br />
31<br />
SECTION 805. COSTS OF ADMINISTRATION. In administering a <strong>trust</strong>, the <strong>trust</strong>ee<br />
143