27.03.2014 Views

uniform trust code - Kansas Judicial Branch

uniform trust code - Kansas Judicial Branch

uniform trust code - Kansas Judicial Branch

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

21<br />

22<br />

23<br />

24<br />

25<br />

26<br />

27<br />

28<br />

29<br />

30<br />

31<br />

32<br />

(d) A person, other than a beneficiary, who holds a power to direct is presumptively<br />

a fiduciary who, as such, is required to act in good faith with regard to the purposes of the <strong>trust</strong> and<br />

the interests of the beneficiaries. The holder of a power to direct is liable for any loss that results<br />

from breach of a fiduciary duty.<br />

<strong>Kansas</strong> Comment<br />

Subsection (a) generally conforms to <strong>Kansas</strong> law, although K.S.A. 17-5004(d) requires the<br />

directions to be in writing.<br />

Subsection (b) is consistent with K.S.A. 58-1206(c), which requires the <strong>trust</strong>ee of any <strong>trust</strong><br />

instrument to exercise due diligence in the safekeeping of <strong>trust</strong> property when carrying out a power<br />

to direct. On the other hand, this subsection conflicts with K.S.A. 17-5004(b), which authorizes the<br />

<strong>trust</strong>ee of a revocable <strong>trust</strong> to follow a power to direct regardless of any fiduciary duties to which<br />

the directing party may be subject.<br />

Subsection (c) is new, although K.S.A. 58-1206(c) recognizes that the <strong>trust</strong> instrument may<br />

confer upon another person the authority to direct the management and administration of the <strong>trust</strong>.<br />

Subsection (d) is new.<br />

UTC Comment<br />

Subsection (a) is an application of Section 603(a), which provides that a revocable <strong>trust</strong> is<br />

subject to the settlor’s exclusive control as long as the settlor has capacity. Because of the settlor’s<br />

degree of control, subsection (a) of this section authorizes a <strong>trust</strong>ee to rely on a written direction<br />

from the settlor even if it is contrary to the terms of the <strong>trust</strong>. The written direction of the settlor<br />

might be regarded as an amendment of the <strong>trust</strong>. Subsection (a) has limited application upon a<br />

settlor’s incapacity. An agent, conservator, or guardian has authority to give the <strong>trust</strong>ee instructions<br />

contrary to the terms of the <strong>trust</strong> only if the agent, conservator, or guardian succeeds to the settlor’s<br />

powers with respect to revocation, amendment, or distribution as provided in Section 602(e).<br />

Subsections (b)-(d) ratify the use of <strong>trust</strong> protectors and advisers. Subsections (b) and (d)<br />

are based in part on Restatement (Second) of Trusts § 185 (1959). Subsection (c) is similar to<br />

Restatement (Third) of Trusts § 64(2) (Tentative Draft No. 3, 2001). “Advisers” have long been<br />

used for certain <strong>trust</strong>ee functions, such as the power to direct investments or manage a closely-held<br />

business. “Trust protector,” a term largely associated with offshore <strong>trust</strong> practice, is more recent and<br />

usually connotes the grant of greater powers, sometimes including the power to amend or terminate<br />

the <strong>trust</strong>. Subsection (c) ratifies the recent trend to grant third persons such broader powers.<br />

A power to direct must be distinguished from a veto power. A power to direct involves<br />

147

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!