uniform trust code - Kansas Judicial Branch
uniform trust code - Kansas Judicial Branch
uniform trust code - Kansas Judicial Branch
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
8<br />
9<br />
10<br />
11<br />
12<br />
13<br />
14<br />
15<br />
16<br />
17<br />
18<br />
19<br />
20<br />
SECTION 403. TRUSTS CREATED IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS. A <strong>trust</strong> not created<br />
by will is validly created if its creation complies with the law of the jurisdiction in which the <strong>trust</strong><br />
instrument was executed, or the law of the jurisdiction in which, at the time of creation:<br />
(1) the settlor was domiciled, had a place of abode, or was a national;<br />
(2) a <strong>trust</strong>ee was domiciled or had a place of business; or<br />
(3) any <strong>trust</strong> property was located.<br />
<strong>Kansas</strong> Comment<br />
This section is new.<br />
UTC Comment<br />
This section is comparable to Section 2-506 of the Uniform Probate Code, which validates<br />
wills executed in compliance with the law of a variety of places in which the testator had a<br />
significant contact. Unlike the UPC, however, this section is not limited to execution of the<br />
instrument but applies to the entire process of a <strong>trust</strong>’s creation, including compliance with the<br />
requirement that there be <strong>trust</strong> property. In addition, unlike the UPC, this section validates a <strong>trust</strong><br />
valid under the law of the domicile or place of business of the designated <strong>trust</strong>ee, or if valid under<br />
the law of the place where any of the <strong>trust</strong> property is located. For the requirements for creating a<br />
<strong>trust</strong>, see Section 402.<br />
SECTION 404. TRUST PURPOSES. A <strong>trust</strong> may be created only to the extent its<br />
purposes are lawful, not contrary to public policy, and possible to achieve. A <strong>trust</strong> and its terms<br />
must be for the benefit of its beneficiaries.<br />
21<br />
22<br />
23<br />
24<br />
25<br />
26<br />
27<br />
<strong>Kansas</strong> Comment<br />
Section clarifies <strong>Kansas</strong> law. Rule apparently not clearly stated in <strong>Kansas</strong> case law for<br />
private <strong>trust</strong>s. See e.g. Fry v. McCormick, 170 Kan. 741, 228 P.2d 727 (1951) (limited analysis<br />
whether <strong>trust</strong> was void based on public policy); In re Estate of Sheets, 175 Kan. 741, 750, 267 P.2d<br />
962 (1954) (provisions of will must be lawful in their purpose, do not contravene the prohibitions<br />
of any statute, and do not violate any positive rule of law); Taliaferro v. Taliaferro, 260 Kan. 573,<br />
Syl. 2, 921 P.2d 803 (1996) (<strong>trust</strong> property must be held for benefit of another person).<br />
55