uniform trust code - Kansas Judicial Branch
uniform trust code - Kansas Judicial Branch
uniform trust code - Kansas Judicial Branch
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
8<br />
9<br />
10<br />
11<br />
12<br />
13<br />
14<br />
15<br />
16<br />
17<br />
18<br />
19<br />
20<br />
on court order, effect a fair and reasonable compromise with any debtor).<br />
UTC Comment<br />
This section codifies the substance of Sections 177 and 178 of the Restatement (Second) of<br />
Trusts (1959). It may not be reasonable to enforce a claim depending upon the likelihood of<br />
recovery and the cost of suit and enforcement. It might also be reasonable to settle an action or<br />
suffer a default rather than to defend an action. See also Section 816(14) (power to pay, contest,<br />
settle, or release claims).<br />
SECTION 812. COLLECTING TRUST PROPERTY. A <strong>trust</strong>ee shall take reasonable<br />
steps to compel a former <strong>trust</strong>ee or other person to deliver <strong>trust</strong> property to the <strong>trust</strong>ee, and to redress<br />
a breach of <strong>trust</strong> known to the <strong>trust</strong>ee to have been committed by a former <strong>trust</strong>ee.<br />
<strong>Kansas</strong> Comment<br />
This specific provision is new, although consistent with <strong>Kansas</strong> law. K.S.A. 59-1710 provides that<br />
the liability of a former <strong>trust</strong>ee previously incurred is not affected by his or her resignation and the<br />
appointment of another <strong>trust</strong>ee. K.S.A. 58-1203(c)(25) gives the <strong>trust</strong>ee power to prosecute claims<br />
for the protection of <strong>trust</strong> property.<br />
In In re Trusteeship of Prager, 106 Kan. 14, 186 P.2d 1015 (1920), the <strong>Kansas</strong> Supreme<br />
Court held the duty to sue a former <strong>trust</strong>ee depends upon the circumstances, such as whether<br />
anything may be gained by suit.<br />
21<br />
22<br />
23<br />
24<br />
25<br />
26<br />
27<br />
28<br />
29<br />
30<br />
31<br />
32<br />
33<br />
UTC Comment<br />
This section is a specific application of Section 811 on the duty to enforce claims, which<br />
includes a claim for <strong>trust</strong> property held by a former <strong>trust</strong>ee or others, and a claim against a<br />
predecessor <strong>trust</strong>ee for breach of <strong>trust</strong>. The duty imposed by this section is not absolute. Pursuit of<br />
a claim is not required if the amount of the claim, costs of suit and enforcement, and likelihood of<br />
recovery, make such action uneconomic. Unlike Restatement (Second) of Trusts § 223 (1959), this<br />
section only requires a successor <strong>trust</strong>ee to redress breaches of <strong>trust</strong> “known” to have been<br />
committed by the predecessor. For the definition of “know,” see Section 104. Limiting the<br />
successor’s obligation to known breaches is a common feature of state <strong>trust</strong> statutes. See, e.g., Mo.<br />
Rev. Stat. § 456.187.2.<br />
As authorized by Section 1009, the beneficiaries may relieve the <strong>trust</strong>ee from potential<br />
liability for failing to pursue a claim against a predecessor <strong>trust</strong>ee or other person holding <strong>trust</strong><br />
property. The obligation to pursue a successor <strong>trust</strong>ee can also be addressed in the terms of the <strong>trust</strong>.<br />
151