27.03.2014 Views

uniform trust code - Kansas Judicial Branch

uniform trust code - Kansas Judicial Branch

uniform trust code - Kansas Judicial Branch

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

on court order, effect a fair and reasonable compromise with any debtor).<br />

UTC Comment<br />

This section codifies the substance of Sections 177 and 178 of the Restatement (Second) of<br />

Trusts (1959). It may not be reasonable to enforce a claim depending upon the likelihood of<br />

recovery and the cost of suit and enforcement. It might also be reasonable to settle an action or<br />

suffer a default rather than to defend an action. See also Section 816(14) (power to pay, contest,<br />

settle, or release claims).<br />

SECTION 812. COLLECTING TRUST PROPERTY. A <strong>trust</strong>ee shall take reasonable<br />

steps to compel a former <strong>trust</strong>ee or other person to deliver <strong>trust</strong> property to the <strong>trust</strong>ee, and to redress<br />

a breach of <strong>trust</strong> known to the <strong>trust</strong>ee to have been committed by a former <strong>trust</strong>ee.<br />

<strong>Kansas</strong> Comment<br />

This specific provision is new, although consistent with <strong>Kansas</strong> law. K.S.A. 59-1710 provides that<br />

the liability of a former <strong>trust</strong>ee previously incurred is not affected by his or her resignation and the<br />

appointment of another <strong>trust</strong>ee. K.S.A. 58-1203(c)(25) gives the <strong>trust</strong>ee power to prosecute claims<br />

for the protection of <strong>trust</strong> property.<br />

In In re Trusteeship of Prager, 106 Kan. 14, 186 P.2d 1015 (1920), the <strong>Kansas</strong> Supreme<br />

Court held the duty to sue a former <strong>trust</strong>ee depends upon the circumstances, such as whether<br />

anything may be gained by suit.<br />

21<br />

22<br />

23<br />

24<br />

25<br />

26<br />

27<br />

28<br />

29<br />

30<br />

31<br />

32<br />

33<br />

UTC Comment<br />

This section is a specific application of Section 811 on the duty to enforce claims, which<br />

includes a claim for <strong>trust</strong> property held by a former <strong>trust</strong>ee or others, and a claim against a<br />

predecessor <strong>trust</strong>ee for breach of <strong>trust</strong>. The duty imposed by this section is not absolute. Pursuit of<br />

a claim is not required if the amount of the claim, costs of suit and enforcement, and likelihood of<br />

recovery, make such action uneconomic. Unlike Restatement (Second) of Trusts § 223 (1959), this<br />

section only requires a successor <strong>trust</strong>ee to redress breaches of <strong>trust</strong> “known” to have been<br />

committed by the predecessor. For the definition of “know,” see Section 104. Limiting the<br />

successor’s obligation to known breaches is a common feature of state <strong>trust</strong> statutes. See, e.g., Mo.<br />

Rev. Stat. § 456.187.2.<br />

As authorized by Section 1009, the beneficiaries may relieve the <strong>trust</strong>ee from potential<br />

liability for failing to pursue a claim against a predecessor <strong>trust</strong>ee or other person holding <strong>trust</strong><br />

property. The obligation to pursue a successor <strong>trust</strong>ee can also be addressed in the terms of the <strong>trust</strong>.<br />

151

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!