27.03.2014 Views

uniform trust code - Kansas Judicial Branch

uniform trust code - Kansas Judicial Branch

uniform trust code - Kansas Judicial Branch

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

21<br />

22<br />

23<br />

24<br />

25<br />

26<br />

27<br />

28<br />

29<br />

SECTION 1009. BENEFICIARY’S CONSENT, RELEASE, OR RATIFICATION.<br />

A <strong>trust</strong>ee is not liable to a beneficiary for breach of <strong>trust</strong> if the beneficiary consented to the conduct<br />

constituting the breach, released the <strong>trust</strong>ee from liability for the breach, or ratified the transaction<br />

constituting the breach, unless:<br />

(1) the consent, release, or ratification of the beneficiary was induced by improper<br />

conduct of the <strong>trust</strong>ee; or<br />

(2) at the time of the consent, release, or ratification, the beneficiary did not know<br />

of the beneficiary’s rights or of the material facts relating to the breach.<br />

<strong>Kansas</strong> Comment<br />

Although the general rule has apparently never been applied in <strong>Kansas</strong>, the <strong>Kansas</strong> Supreme<br />

Court has stated it has no quarrel with the doctrine. See Gillespie v. Seymour, 250 Kan. 123, 130,<br />

823 P.2d 782 (1991) (doctrine cited at length but inapplicable to facts of case).<br />

UTC Comment<br />

This section is based on Sections 216 through 218 of the Restatement (Second) of Trusts<br />

(1959). A consent, release, or affirmance under this section may occur either before or after the<br />

approved conduct. This section requires an affirmative act by the beneficiary. A failure to object<br />

is not sufficient. See Restatement (Second) of Trusts § 216 cmt. a (1959). A consent is binding on<br />

a consenting beneficiary although other beneficiaries have not consented. See Restatement (Second)<br />

of Trusts § 216 cmt. g (1959). To constitute a valid consent, the beneficiary must know of the<br />

beneficiary’s rights and of the material facts relating to the breach. See Restatement (Second) of<br />

Trusts § 216 cmt. k (1959). If the beneficiary’s approval involves a self-dealing transaction, the<br />

approval is binding only if the transaction was fair and reasonable. See Restatement (Second) of<br />

Trusts §§ 170(2), 216(3) and cmt. n (1959).<br />

An approval by the settlor of a revocable <strong>trust</strong> or by the holder of a presently exercisable<br />

power of withdrawal binds all the beneficiaries. See Section 603. A beneficiary is also bound to<br />

the extent an approval is given by a person authorized to represent the beneficiary as provided in<br />

Article 3.<br />

2001 UTC Comment<br />

188

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!