18.04.2014 Views

Agenda item 4 - MTFS (Final) Cab 070213 , item 9. PDF 1 MB

Agenda item 4 - MTFS (Final) Cab 070213 , item 9. PDF 1 MB

Agenda item 4 - MTFS (Final) Cab 070213 , item 9. PDF 1 MB

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

In the future there is a risk that the council will be expected to meet these costs without a<br />

DSG funded budget to meet the cost; as a consequence the Schools’ Forum has<br />

recommended that a number of long standing deficits in maintained schools should be<br />

written off.<br />

The Schools Forum discussed options for writing off deficits at its 28 th November 2012<br />

meeting and again on 9 th January.<br />

The contexts for the discussions were:<br />

• At 31 st March 2013 there are projected to be 18 schools in deficit; the aggregate deficit<br />

is estimated at £1.429 million.<br />

• A number of these schools have an ‘historic’ deficit i.e. the deficit has been built up in<br />

the past, usually under previous school leadership, and is challenging to reduce,<br />

especially where pupil numbers are static or reducing.<br />

• Requests to write off or reduce deficits have been rare because the focus has been on<br />

encouraging all schools to manage their budgets effectively.<br />

• DfE advice on the position from 1 st April 2013 is equivocal: LAs may write off deficits<br />

‘from their own resources’ but cannot make provision within the DSG schools block.<br />

• It is not clear whether, with the agreement of the Schools Forum, deficits may be written<br />

off from DSG balances held in the High Needs Block. There is a significant DSG<br />

balance projected for 31 st March 2013; given future uncertainties there is an opportunity<br />

to address the current deficits that may be unlikely to arise again.<br />

In its initial discussion in November 2012 the Forum expressed concerns about the principle<br />

of writing off deficits when many schools had had to take difficult budget decisions, but<br />

acknowledged that some schools had faced particular challenges. Officers were asked to<br />

review the circumstances of each of the schools with a deficit and develop more detailed<br />

criteria for write-off. At its 9 th January 2013 meeting the Forum considered the proposed<br />

criteria and the risks for the council, the Dedicated Schools Grant and for the pupils in the<br />

schools concerned. After a lengthy debate The Forum agreed to recommend the principle<br />

of writing off school deficits subject to the application of robust criteria to be applied in<br />

respect of individual schools.<br />

It is therefore recommended that school deficits are written off in schools where:<br />

• an in-year revenue balance has been achieved i.e. the school has restructured its<br />

finances so that spending does not exceed the annual budget<br />

• a substantial amount of the deficit will have been repaid by March 2013<br />

• there has either been a change of leadership or the school has significantly<br />

restructured (e.g. gone to mixed age teaching, amalgamated infants and junior)<br />

Many of these schools have also been categorised by Ofsted as requiring Special<br />

Measures and/or suffered a fall in pupil numbers.<br />

There are a further three schools that converted to academy status with a deficit but prior to<br />

31 st March 2012. The Forum recommends that the same principles be applied to these<br />

schools in consultation with the Education Funding Agency.<br />

16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!