Agenda item 4 - MTFS (Final) Cab 070213 , item 9. PDF 1 MB
Agenda item 4 - MTFS (Final) Cab 070213 , item 9. PDF 1 MB
Agenda item 4 - MTFS (Final) Cab 070213 , item 9. PDF 1 MB
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
In the future there is a risk that the council will be expected to meet these costs without a<br />
DSG funded budget to meet the cost; as a consequence the Schools’ Forum has<br />
recommended that a number of long standing deficits in maintained schools should be<br />
written off.<br />
The Schools Forum discussed options for writing off deficits at its 28 th November 2012<br />
meeting and again on 9 th January.<br />
The contexts for the discussions were:<br />
• At 31 st March 2013 there are projected to be 18 schools in deficit; the aggregate deficit<br />
is estimated at £1.429 million.<br />
• A number of these schools have an ‘historic’ deficit i.e. the deficit has been built up in<br />
the past, usually under previous school leadership, and is challenging to reduce,<br />
especially where pupil numbers are static or reducing.<br />
• Requests to write off or reduce deficits have been rare because the focus has been on<br />
encouraging all schools to manage their budgets effectively.<br />
• DfE advice on the position from 1 st April 2013 is equivocal: LAs may write off deficits<br />
‘from their own resources’ but cannot make provision within the DSG schools block.<br />
• It is not clear whether, with the agreement of the Schools Forum, deficits may be written<br />
off from DSG balances held in the High Needs Block. There is a significant DSG<br />
balance projected for 31 st March 2013; given future uncertainties there is an opportunity<br />
to address the current deficits that may be unlikely to arise again.<br />
In its initial discussion in November 2012 the Forum expressed concerns about the principle<br />
of writing off deficits when many schools had had to take difficult budget decisions, but<br />
acknowledged that some schools had faced particular challenges. Officers were asked to<br />
review the circumstances of each of the schools with a deficit and develop more detailed<br />
criteria for write-off. At its 9 th January 2013 meeting the Forum considered the proposed<br />
criteria and the risks for the council, the Dedicated Schools Grant and for the pupils in the<br />
schools concerned. After a lengthy debate The Forum agreed to recommend the principle<br />
of writing off school deficits subject to the application of robust criteria to be applied in<br />
respect of individual schools.<br />
It is therefore recommended that school deficits are written off in schools where:<br />
• an in-year revenue balance has been achieved i.e. the school has restructured its<br />
finances so that spending does not exceed the annual budget<br />
• a substantial amount of the deficit will have been repaid by March 2013<br />
• there has either been a change of leadership or the school has significantly<br />
restructured (e.g. gone to mixed age teaching, amalgamated infants and junior)<br />
Many of these schools have also been categorised by Ofsted as requiring Special<br />
Measures and/or suffered a fall in pupil numbers.<br />
There are a further three schools that converted to academy status with a deficit but prior to<br />
31 st March 2012. The Forum recommends that the same principles be applied to these<br />
schools in consultation with the Education Funding Agency.<br />
16