II - National Criminal Justice Reference Service
II - National Criminal Justice Reference Service
II - National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
HEALTH<br />
PUIJLlCATIONS<br />
--<br />
,<br />
i<br />
, -<br />
-., I<br />
i .... ~.'.<br />
I<br />
I<br />
~<br />
I<br />
!<br />
~<br />
1<br />
f<br />
I<br />
SIVE FOOTNOTED REFERENCES AND SMALLER BIBLIOGRA<br />
PHIES.<br />
SUpplerMntal Nots.: NATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE EXECU.<br />
TIVE TRAINING PROGRAM.<br />
~ Agency: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE<br />
OF DEVELOPMENT, TESTiNG AND DISSEMINATION, 633 INDI.<br />
ANA AVENUE, WASHINGTON DC 20531.<br />
Avlllleblllty: NCJRS MICROFICHE PROGR.~M.<br />
61. HEALTH CARE IN CORAECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS-PARTICI.<br />
PANT'S HANDBOOk. Iy N. I. OLUCkSTEAN, M. NEUSE, J.<br />
HARNEss, R. PACKAAD, lind C. PATMOH. UNIVERSITY RE.<br />
SEARCH CORPORATION, 5530 WISCONSIN AVENUE, WASH.<br />
INGTON DC. 130 p. 1977. HCJ.473t13<br />
THIS HANDBOOK TRACES SESSION·BY.SESSION A WORK. '<br />
SHOP FOR THE TOP 60 STATE AND LOCAL POLICYMAKERS<br />
RESPONSI.~LE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTA.<br />
TION OF Hi:ALTH CARE STANDARDS FOR CORRECTIONAL IN.<br />
STITUTIONS. THE WORKSHOP CONSISTS OF 10 SESSIONS<br />
CONDUCTED OVER A a.DAY .PERIOD. THE FIRST THREE SES<br />
SIONS DEA~ WITH AN OVERVIEW OF WORKSHOP GOALS, A<br />
NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR HEALTH CARE DELIVERY IN COR.<br />
RECTIONS. AN EXA~AINATION OF HEALTH CARE DELIVERY<br />
SYSTEMS WITHIN CORRECTIONAL SETTINGS, AND A DISCUS.<br />
SION OF THE USE AND ASSESSMENT OF HEALTH CARE<br />
STANDARDS REGARDING THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH<br />
SERVICES DELIVERY WITHIN "HE CORRECTIONAL SETTING.<br />
BOTH HEALTH CARE SERVICE AND SERVICES RESOURCE<br />
CHECKLISTS ARE PROVIDED. AS ARE TWO CASE STUDIES<br />
OF STANDARDS FOR HEALTH EDUCATION. THE NEXT FOUR<br />
SESSIONS DISCUSS SUPPORT SERVICES NEEDED FOR EF.<br />
FECTIVE HEALTH CARE SERVICE, MANAGEMENT OF HEALTH<br />
CARE DELIVERY IN CORRECTIONS. AND IMPLEMENTING<br />
CHANGE WITHIN THE ENVIRONMENT OF CORRECTIONAL IN.<br />
STITUTIONS. A REVIEW IS ALSO PROVIDED OF THE HEALTH<br />
CARE DELIVERY SYSTEM RELATIVE TO CHANGES AND OP.<br />
TIONS IN SERVICE DELIVERY AND MANAGEMENT. THE FINAL<br />
THREE SESSIONS ARE DEVOTED TO IDENTIFYING AND IN.<br />
FLUENCING EXTERNAL. AGENCIES AND ATTITUDES WHICH<br />
AFFECT HEALTH CARE DELIVERY, DEVELOPING ACTION<br />
PLANS FOR EFFECTING CHANGE WITHIN SPECIFIC HEALTH<br />
CARE DELIVERY SYSTEMS, AND DISCUSSING FUTURE TRAIN.<br />
ING POSSIBILITIES. WORKSHEETS, OBSERVER FORMS, SAM.<br />
PLES OF CORRESPONDENCE, AND OTHER SUPPORTING MA.<br />
TERIALS ARE PROVIDED FOR EACH SESSION. APPENDIXES<br />
PROVIDE WORKSHOP LOGISTICS, A BIBLIOGRAPHY. AND A<br />
GLOSSARY OF TERMS OFTEN ENCOUNTERED IN DISCUS<br />
SIONS OF HEALTH CARE SERVICE DELIVERY WITHIN COR.<br />
RECTIONAL SETTINGS.<br />
Ic.IppIemenI8l NotM: EXECUTIVE TRAINING p,ROGRAM IN AD-<br />
VANCED CRIMINAL JUSTICE PRACTICES. • ~<br />
8poMortng AIency: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTiCE OFFICE<br />
OF DEVELOPMENT, TESTING AND DISSEMINATION, 633 INDI.<br />
ANA AVENUE, WASHINGTON DC 20531.<br />
Avllllblllty: NCJRS MICROFICHE PROGRAM.<br />
, 62. HEALTH CARE IN CORRECTIONAL IHiTITUTIOH8-TRAIN<br />
EA'8 HAH~. IV N. I. GLUCkmRN, M. NEUSE, J.<br />
HARNESS, R. PACkARD, lind C. PATMOH. UNIVERSITY RE.<br />
SEARCH CORPORATION, 5530 WISCONSIN AVENUE, WASH.<br />
INGTON DC. 218 p. 1977. .HCJ.54f41<br />
THIS TRAINER'S MANUAL TRACES SESSION·BY.SESSION A<br />
WORKSHOP FOR ST".lE AND LOCAL POLICYMAKERS RE.<br />
SPONSIBLE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION<br />
OF HEALTH CARE STANDARDS FOR CORRECTIONAL INSTI.<br />
TUTIONS. PARr OF lEM'S EXECUTIVE TRAlr~ING PROGRAM<br />
IN ADVANcED CRIMINAL JUSTICE PRACTICES, THE MANUAL<br />
OUTLINES THE INSTRUCTOR'S ROLE IN A WORKSHOP CON.<br />
SISTING OF 10 SESSIONS OV!:A A 3·DAY peRIOD. THE<br />
GOALS OF EACH SESSION ARE OUTLINED, ALONG WITH RA.<br />
TIONALE, INSTRUCTIONAL METHOD, AND MATERIALS/lOG IS.<br />
TICS PRIMARY TO THE SESSION'S SELECTED TOPIC. THE<br />
18<br />
FIRST THREE SESSIONS DEAL WITH AN OVERVIEW OF THE<br />
WORKSHOP GOALS, A NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR HEALTH<br />
CARE DELlVEA'1J IN CORRECTIONS, AN EXAMINATION OF<br />
HEALTH CARE DELIVERY SYSTEMS WITHIN CORRECTIONAL<br />
SET<strong>II</strong>NGS, AND A DISCUSSION OF THE USE AND ASSESS.<br />
MENT OF HEALTH CARE STANDARDS !N TERMS OF THEIR<br />
IMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH SERVICE. THE REMAINI~JG .SES<br />
SIONS COVER SUPPORT SEAVICES NEEDED FOR EFFECTIVE<br />
HEALTH CARE DEliVeRY, IMPLICATIONS OF USING STAND.<br />
ARDS FOR PERSONNEL, MANAGING HEALTH CARE DELIV.<br />
ERY IN CORRECTIONS, IMPLEMENTING CHANGE IN CORREC<br />
TiONAL INSTITUTIONS, CONTROLLING EXTERNAL INFLU.<br />
ENCES,.AND DEVELOPING ACTION PLA.~S FOR INSTITUTING<br />
CHANGES WITHIN THE CORRECTIONAL SETTING. SAMPLE<br />
FORMS ARE INCLUDED. AN EXERCISE IN DEVELOPING A<br />
COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK AMOI~G PRISON PERSoNNEL<br />
AND DECISION MAKERS IS APPENDED. SEE ALSO NCJ 47392<br />
AND 47393,<br />
'<br />
8uppilmenUi Hotea: FROM THE EXECUTIVE TRAINING PRO.<br />
GRAM IN ADVANCED CRIMINAL JUSTICE PRACTICES.<br />
Sponaorl,'1<strong>II</strong> Agency: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE<br />
OF DEVELOPMENT, TESTING AND DISSEMINATION, 633 INDI.<br />
ANA AVENUE, WASHINGTON DC 20531.<br />
Ava!llblllty: NCJRS MICROFICHE PROGRAM.<br />
63. HIGH SPEED PATROL CAA TIRES-A GUIDE. BV A. C.<br />
LEWIS end Eo LEWIS JA. US DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE<br />
NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS LAW ENFORCEMENT<br />
STANDARDS LABORATORY, WASHINGTON DC 20234: 42 p.<br />
1979. ~5t72t<br />
THIS GUIDE PROVIDES TECHNICAL INFORMATION FOR SE.<br />
lECTING TIRES TO SUIT THE NEEDS OF HIGH SPEED POLICE<br />
PURSUIT CARS, AND FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE TIRES FOR<br />
MAXIMUM SAFETY, TIRE LIFE, AND PERFORMANCE. THE<br />
COMPARATIVE DATA ON TIRE CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION,<br />
AND MAINTENANCE PRI:SENTED WERE COLLECTED FROM<br />
TESTS DONE TO EVALUATE COMPARATIVE TRACTION AND<br />
PERFORMANCE OF VARIOUS BRANDS AND SIZES OF HIGH<br />
SPEED PURSUIT TIRES. BASED ON INFORMATION COllECT.<br />
ED FROM A SURVEY OF POLICE DEPARTMENTS THROUGH.<br />
OUT THE COUNTRY BY THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION<br />
OF CHIEFS OF POLICE. USES FOR H!GH SPEED PURSUIT<br />
TIRES ARE DISCUSSED; I.E., TYPES OF ROADS DRIVEN, PUR.<br />
SUIT DRIVING, TIRE MAINTENANCE, HAZARD EXPOSURE,<br />
TYPES OF TIRES USED, TIRE MILEAGE, SNOW TIRE USAGE,<br />
ANt) ASPECTS OF RADIALS VERSUS SNOW TIRES. TECHNI.<br />
CAL FACTORS EXAMINED INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION, TIRE<br />
MARKINGS, TIRE MATERIALS, USE OF CHAINS, AND THE<br />
GASoLINE MIlEAGE OF CERTAIN TIRES. COST FACTORS,<br />
PRINCIPLES OF SELECTION, AND PERFORMANCE CRITERIA<br />
ARE DETAILED. OPERATIONAL ASPECTS SUCH AS INSTAlLA.<br />
TION, BREAKING IN THE TIRES, ROAD CONDITIONS, INFLA.<br />
TION CHECKS, ROTATION, REPAIRS, AND SERVICING ARE<br />
COVERED AS ESSENTIAL TO OPTIMAL TIRE SELECTION AND<br />
USE. {lIAGRAMS, GRAPHS, TABLES, AND PHOTOGRAPHS AC<br />
COMPANY THE TEXT. THE FEDERAL QUALIFIED PRODUCTS<br />
lIST, A CHART FOR TIRE INTIERCHANGEABILlTY AND lOAD<br />
AND INFLATION DATA, AND A TIRE MIXING GUIDE ARE Ap.<br />
PENDED.<br />
IUppllmen'" HolM: A LIMITED NUMBER OF COPIES ARE<br />
AVAILABLE FROM NBS.<br />
~ Agency: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE lEM NA.<br />
TIONAl INSTITUTE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CRIMINAL<br />
JUSTICE, 633 INDIANA AVENUE NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20531-<br />
AV<strong>II</strong><strong>II</strong>bi<strong>II</strong>ty: GPO Stock Order No. 003-OO3.()2073.7· US DE.<br />
PARTMENT OF· COMMERCE NATIONAL BUREAU OF STAND.<br />
ARDS LAW ENFORCEMENT STANDARDS LABORATORY<br />
WASHINGTON DC 20234 Stock Order No. NBS SP 480.33:<br />
NCJRS MICROFICHE PROGRAM.<br />
'<br />
OF THE NIJ<br />
~, ILLEGAL CORPORATE IEHAVIOR. Iy. M. I. CUNARD, P. C.<br />
YEAGEA, J. IR<strong>II</strong>IETTE, D. PETRAlHEK, 8I1d E. HARRIES,<br />
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF SOCIOLOGY,<br />
MADISON WI 53706. 348 p. 1979. NCJ.57n3<br />
FOCUSING ON SEVERAL HUNDRED MAJOR CORPOrIATIONS,<br />
THis STUDY REPRESENTS THE FIRST LAR,GE·SCAlE, COM·<br />
PREHENSIVE INVESTIGATION OF CORPORATIONS FOR AC<br />
TIONS THAT VIOLATE THE LAW. ALTHOUGH THE EMPIRICAL<br />
INVESTIGATiON CONCENTRATED ON 582 OF THE LARGEST<br />
PUBl!CLY OWNED CORPORATIONS IN.THE U.S., THE MAJOR<br />
FOCUS WAS ONMANUrACTURING FIRMS WHOSE ANNUAL<br />
SALES (1875, RANGED FROM $300 MILLION TO MORE THAN<br />
$45 BILLION, WITH AN AVERAGE SALES VOLUME OF $1.7 BIL·<br />
liON. THE STUDY DATA COVERED ALL ENFORCEMENT AC<br />
TIONS OBTAINABLE, ACTIONS INITIATED OR IMPOSED BY 24<br />
FEDERAL AGENCIES DURING 1975 AND 11176. THE DATA<br />
REVEAL A WIDE RANGE OF CORPORATE VIOLATIONS, AS<br />
WEll AS AorlON INITIATED AND IMPOSED BY GOVERNMENT<br />
AGENCIES. PREDICTIONS OF VIOLATIONS ARE ATlCMPTED<br />
THROUGH ANALYSES OFTEN USED TO COMPARE<br />
INDUSTRY·lEVEl AND ECONOMY·LEVEL DATA. THESE DATA<br />
SHOW THAT UNFAVORABLE TRENDS IN SALES, PROFITS,<br />
EARNINGS. AND PRODUCT DIVERSIFICATION AREl ASSOCIAT<br />
ED WITli VIOLATIONS. A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS IS PRE·<br />
SENTED OF THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THOSE CORPORA·<br />
TIONS AGAINST WHICH LIMITED ACTIONS HAVE BEEN INITI·<br />
ATED AND THOSE "GAINST WHICH ACTIONS HAVE BEEN EX·<br />
TENSIVE. TO TEST THE VIEW THAT PRESSURES FROM<br />
PARENT CORPORATIONS TO INCREASE PROFITS CONTRIB·<br />
UTE TO THE GREATER VIOLATIONS BY SUBSIDIARIES, AC<br />
TIONS AGAINST PARENT CORPORATIONS ARE COMPARED<br />
WITH ACTIONS AGAINST THEIR 101 LARGEST SUBSIDIARIES,<br />
WHOSE 1978 SALES RANGED FROM $300 MILLION TO $7.8<br />
BilLION. AN ANALYSIS IS PROVIDED OF THE METHODOLOG·<br />
ICAL PROBLEMS IN STUDYING CORPORATE CRIME AND THE<br />
INADEQUACY OF FEDERAL STATUTES ON CORPORATE<br />
CRIME. OTHER TOPICS DISCUSSED ARE CORPORATE ORGA·<br />
NI1.ATION AND CORPORATE CRIME, REGULATORY AGENCIES<br />
ANO ,FEDERAL AND STATE RELATIONS IN CONTROLLING<br />
CORpQR~TE CRIME, CORPORATE ANTITRUST AND ILLEGAL<br />
PAYMENTS VIOLATIONS, CORPORATE EXECUTIVES AND<br />
CRIMINAL LIABILITY, AND THE CONTROL OF CORPORATE<br />
CRIME. TABULAR DATA AND REFERENCES ARE PROVIDED.<br />
(AUTHOR ABSTRACT MODIFIED)<br />
SponIorIng Agency: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LEAA NA·<br />
TIONAL INSTITUTE OF· LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CRIMINAL<br />
JUSTICE, 633 iNDIANA AVENUE NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20531.<br />
Av8llablllty: GPO Stock Order No. 02NlOO.()()843·7; NCJRS<br />
MICROFICHE PROGRAM. NCJRS.<br />
65. IMPACT OF AFFIRMAnVE ACTION AND CIVIl. SERVICE ON<br />
AMERICAN POUCE PEASONNEL SYSTEMS. Iy H. O.<br />
LOCKE. PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION SERVICE, 1778 MASSA·<br />
CHUSETTS AVENUE, NW, WASHINGTON DC 20038. 19 p.<br />
1979. HCJ·H2116<br />
THE IMPACT OF CIVIL SERVICE AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION<br />
PROGRAMS ON MINORITY EMPLOYMENT IN THE LAW EN·<br />
FORCEMENT SETTING IS ADDRESSED IN THIS MONOGRAPH.<br />
EACH STAGE OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT'S PROGRAM<br />
TO INSURE EQUALEMPl0YMENT OPPORTUNITY FROM NON·<br />
DISCRIMINATION THROUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION HAS BEEN<br />
ACCOMPANIED BY ACRIMONIOUS PUBLIC DEBATE, FOCUS·<br />
ING PARTICULARLY ON AFrJRMATIVE ACTION WHICH IS DE·<br />
SIGNED TO DEVELOP GUIDELINES, TIMETABLES, AND OTHER<br />
MEASURABLE INDICES BY WHICH EMPLOYERS CAN BE HELD<br />
ACCOUNTABLE FOR THEIR P~OGRESS, OR LACK OF IT, IN<br />
IMPLEMENTING NATIONAL POLICY. THE PRINCIPAL BURDEN<br />
OF FINDING ANSWERS TO THE COMPLEX ISSUES SUR·<br />
ROUNDING MINORITY EMPLOYMENT HAS FALLEN TO THE<br />
COURTS. NUMEROUS JUDICIAL DECISIONS, WITH ENOR·<br />
MOUS IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICE AGENCiES, HAVE BEEN<br />
IMPROVING<br />
TRANSLATED INTO PROCEDURAL REGULATIONS COVERING<br />
THE MEASURES, TECHNIQUES, CRITERIA, AND 'PROCESSES<br />
THAT MAY BE USED FOR EMPLQYMENT DECISIONS AND EM·<br />
PlOYMENT SELECTION. ~VERAL EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES<br />
WHICH MAY CREATE PROBLEMS IN THE AREA OF EMPLOY·<br />
MENT DISCRIMINATION ARE INCLUDED. WHETHER DUE TO<br />
ENLIGHTENED POLICE I.EADERSHIP, COMMUNITY PRES<br />
SURES, POLITICAL CIRCUMSTANCES, CIVil SERVICE INTER·<br />
'JENTION, OR A COMBINATION OF ALL l1iESE FACTORS, THE<br />
RACIAL CHARACTERISTICS OF AMERICAN?OLlCING HAVE<br />
BeGUN TO CHANGE SUBSTANTIALLY OVER THE PAST<br />
DECADE. TEN YEARS AGO, APPROXIMATELY 4 PERCENT OF<br />
THE SWORN POLICE PERSONNEL IN THE NATION WERE<br />
RACIAL MINORITIES: TODAY. THAT FIGURE HAS RISEN TO 10<br />
PERCENT. FINDINGS OF THE PUBLIC SERVICE ADMINISTRA·<br />
TION SHOW THAT ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT FACTORS<br />
IN CHANGING THE NATURE .AND QUALITY OF POLICING IS<br />
THE COURAGE AND COMMITMENT OF POLICE LEADERSHIP.<br />
TO THE EXTENT THAT INCREASING MINORITY AND FEMALE<br />
PARTICIPATION IN THE RANKS OF SWORN POLICE OFFICERS<br />
IS A CRUCIAL i'ART OF! THIS CHANGE PROCESS; THERE IS<br />
THE ACOED FINDING 1HAT SUCH EFFORTS ARE NOT EN·<br />
HANCED BY A RELIANCE ON THE REGULATORY ROLE OF<br />
CIVIL SERVICE. SEVERAL SUGGESTIONS FOR INSTITUTIONA·<br />
L1ZING THIS CHANGE PROCESS ARE NOTED. REFERENCE<br />
NOTES ARE APPENDED.<br />
IpoMorIng Agency: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE lEM NA·<br />
TIONAL INSTITUTE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CRIMI~JAL<br />
JUSTICE, 633 INDIANA AVENUE NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20531.<br />
Avllllblllty: GPO Stock Order No. 027-()()0'()08~.9; NCJRS<br />
MICROFICHE FROGRAM.<br />
/ • '<br />
/1<br />
H. IMPROVING THE CRIMIHAL PROCElSlHO.QF M<strong>II</strong>DEMEAH<br />
ANTI-THE IMPROVED LOWEA COUAT/CASE HAHDUNQ<br />
PROGRAM-kALAMAZOO (kALAMAZOO COUNTY), MICHI<br />
GAN-NATIONAL EVALUATION FINAL AEPORr. By E.<br />
CHEi.lMSlCY, M. FISCHEL, lind J. 1ASfY. MITRE CORPORA·<br />
TION WASHINGTON OPERATIONS, 1820 DOllEY MADISON<br />
BOULEVARD MCLEAN VA 22101. 112 p; 1978.<br />
, HCJ-4''J'"<br />
THE IMPROVED lOWER COURT CASS HANDLING (lLCCli)<br />
PROGRAM IN KALAMAZOO COUNTY, MICH., WAS EVALUATED<br />
AS PART OF A LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE ADMINIS·<br />
TAlmON EFFORT TO IMPROVE THE CASE IPROCESSING OF<br />
MISDEMEANANTS. EIGHT PROGRAM COMPONENTS WERE<br />
DESIGNED TO IMPROVE THE PROCESSING OF MISDEMEAN·<br />
ANT OFFENDERS. FOUR COMPONENTS OFFERED LAW EN·<br />
FORCEMENT AND JUDICIAL PERSONNEL lESS DRASTIC<br />
METHODS FOR HANDLING MISDEMEANANTS: POLICE CITA·<br />
TIONS, COURT SUMMONS, PRETRIAL RELEASE, AND SELECT<br />
OFFENDER PROBATION. THREE 'COMPONENTS WERE DE·<br />
SIGNED TO PROVIDE CONSISTENCY AND EFFICIENCY IN<br />
HANDLING MISDEMEANOR CASES: CASE SCREENING,<br />
PROMIS, AND SHORT FORM PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATION<br />
REPORTS. THE EIGHTH COMPONENT KNOWN AS THE MASS<br />
CASE COORDINATOR WAS DESIGNED TO FOSTER COOPERA·<br />
TICN AMONG PROGRAM COMPONENTS AND ACROSS CRIMI·<br />
NAL JUSTICE AGENCIES. THE ILCCH PROGRAM iN KALAMA·<br />
ZOO WAS UNIQUE IN MAINTAINING AN ACTIVE COORDINAT·<br />
ING COUNCil COMPOSED OF REPRESENTATIVES FROM<br />
CRIMINAL JUSTICE AGENCIES THROUGHOUT THE COUNTY. A<br />
UNIFORM CITATION FORM WAS DEVELOPED AND ADOPTED<br />
BY ALL POLICE AGENCIES. EFFORTS TO IMPLEMENT COURT<br />
SUMMONS FOR USE IN HANDLING CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS<br />
FAilED. A MISDEMEANOR PRETRIAL RELEASE PROGRAM<br />
WAS DEVELOPED TO EXTEND INTERVIEW/RECOMMENDA·<br />
TION SERVICES AVAILABLE TO FELONS TO MISDEMEAN·<br />
ANTS. SCREENING WAS CONDUCTED BY All. PROSECU·<br />
TIONAl AGENCIES IN THE COUNTY, so THE SCRI;EN!NG<br />
COMPONENT WAS DIRECTED TOWARD PROBLEMS ASSOCI·<br />
ATED WITH THE CONSISTENCY OF SCREENING AND CHARG·<br />
ING PRACTICES. A SEMIAUTOMATED INFOR,MATION SYSTEM<br />
;<br />
. \<br />
18<br />
"<br />
I<br />
. "<br />
.'"<br />
.~<br />
I