29.04.2014 Views

II - National Criminal Justice Reference Service

II - National Criminal Justice Reference Service

II - National Criminal Justice Reference Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

HEALTH<br />

PUIJLlCATIONS<br />

--<br />

,<br />

i<br />

, -<br />

-., I<br />

i .... ~.'.<br />

I<br />

I<br />

~<br />

I<br />

!<br />

~<br />

1<br />

f<br />

I<br />

SIVE FOOTNOTED REFERENCES AND SMALLER BIBLIOGRA­<br />

PHIES.<br />

SUpplerMntal Nots.: NATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE EXECU.<br />

TIVE TRAINING PROGRAM.<br />

~ Agency: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE<br />

OF DEVELOPMENT, TESTiNG AND DISSEMINATION, 633 INDI.<br />

ANA AVENUE, WASHINGTON DC 20531.<br />

Avlllleblllty: NCJRS MICROFICHE PROGR.~M.<br />

61. HEALTH CARE IN CORAECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS-PARTICI.<br />

PANT'S HANDBOOk. Iy N. I. OLUCkSTEAN, M. NEUSE, J.<br />

HARNEss, R. PACKAAD, lind C. PATMOH. UNIVERSITY RE.<br />

SEARCH CORPORATION, 5530 WISCONSIN AVENUE, WASH.<br />

INGTON DC. 130 p. 1977. HCJ.473t13<br />

THIS HANDBOOK TRACES SESSION·BY.SESSION A WORK. '<br />

SHOP FOR THE TOP 60 STATE AND LOCAL POLICYMAKERS<br />

RESPONSI.~LE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTA.<br />

TION OF Hi:ALTH CARE STANDARDS FOR CORRECTIONAL IN.<br />

STITUTIONS. THE WORKSHOP CONSISTS OF 10 SESSIONS<br />

CONDUCTED OVER A a.DAY .PERIOD. THE FIRST THREE SES­<br />

SIONS DEA~ WITH AN OVERVIEW OF WORKSHOP GOALS, A<br />

NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR HEALTH CARE DELIVERY IN COR.<br />

RECTIONS. AN EXA~AINATION OF HEALTH CARE DELIVERY<br />

SYSTEMS WITHIN CORRECTIONAL SETTINGS, AND A DISCUS.<br />

SION OF THE USE AND ASSESSMENT OF HEALTH CARE<br />

STANDARDS REGARDING THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH<br />

SERVICES DELIVERY WITHIN "HE CORRECTIONAL SETTING.<br />

BOTH HEALTH CARE SERVICE AND SERVICES RESOURCE<br />

CHECKLISTS ARE PROVIDED. AS ARE TWO CASE STUDIES<br />

OF STANDARDS FOR HEALTH EDUCATION. THE NEXT FOUR<br />

SESSIONS DISCUSS SUPPORT SERVICES NEEDED FOR EF.<br />

FECTIVE HEALTH CARE SERVICE, MANAGEMENT OF HEALTH<br />

CARE DELIVERY IN CORRECTIONS. AND IMPLEMENTING<br />

CHANGE WITHIN THE ENVIRONMENT OF CORRECTIONAL IN.<br />

STITUTIONS. A REVIEW IS ALSO PROVIDED OF THE HEALTH<br />

CARE DELIVERY SYSTEM RELATIVE TO CHANGES AND OP.<br />

TIONS IN SERVICE DELIVERY AND MANAGEMENT. THE FINAL<br />

THREE SESSIONS ARE DEVOTED TO IDENTIFYING AND IN.<br />

FLUENCING EXTERNAL. AGENCIES AND ATTITUDES WHICH<br />

AFFECT HEALTH CARE DELIVERY, DEVELOPING ACTION<br />

PLANS FOR EFFECTING CHANGE WITHIN SPECIFIC HEALTH<br />

CARE DELIVERY SYSTEMS, AND DISCUSSING FUTURE TRAIN.<br />

ING POSSIBILITIES. WORKSHEETS, OBSERVER FORMS, SAM.<br />

PLES OF CORRESPONDENCE, AND OTHER SUPPORTING MA.<br />

TERIALS ARE PROVIDED FOR EACH SESSION. APPENDIXES<br />

PROVIDE WORKSHOP LOGISTICS, A BIBLIOGRAPHY. AND A<br />

GLOSSARY OF TERMS OFTEN ENCOUNTERED IN DISCUS­<br />

SIONS OF HEALTH CARE SERVICE DELIVERY WITHIN COR.<br />

RECTIONAL SETTINGS.<br />

Ic.IppIemenI8l NotM: EXECUTIVE TRAINING p,ROGRAM IN AD-<br />

VANCED CRIMINAL JUSTICE PRACTICES. • ~<br />

8poMortng AIency: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTiCE OFFICE<br />

OF DEVELOPMENT, TESTING AND DISSEMINATION, 633 INDI.<br />

ANA AVENUE, WASHINGTON DC 20531.<br />

Avllllblllty: NCJRS MICROFICHE PROGRAM.<br />

, 62. HEALTH CARE IN CORRECTIONAL IHiTITUTIOH8-TRAIN­<br />

EA'8 HAH~. IV N. I. GLUCkmRN, M. NEUSE, J.<br />

HARNESS, R. PACkARD, lind C. PATMOH. UNIVERSITY RE.<br />

SEARCH CORPORATION, 5530 WISCONSIN AVENUE, WASH.<br />

INGTON DC. 218 p. 1977. .HCJ.54f41<br />

THIS TRAINER'S MANUAL TRACES SESSION·BY.SESSION A<br />

WORKSHOP FOR ST".lE AND LOCAL POLICYMAKERS RE.<br />

SPONSIBLE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION<br />

OF HEALTH CARE STANDARDS FOR CORRECTIONAL INSTI.<br />

TUTIONS. PARr OF lEM'S EXECUTIVE TRAlr~ING PROGRAM<br />

IN ADVANcED CRIMINAL JUSTICE PRACTICES, THE MANUAL<br />

OUTLINES THE INSTRUCTOR'S ROLE IN A WORKSHOP CON.<br />

SISTING OF 10 SESSIONS OV!:A A 3·DAY peRIOD. THE<br />

GOALS OF EACH SESSION ARE OUTLINED, ALONG WITH RA.<br />

TIONALE, INSTRUCTIONAL METHOD, AND MATERIALS/lOG IS.<br />

TICS PRIMARY TO THE SESSION'S SELECTED TOPIC. THE<br />

18<br />

FIRST THREE SESSIONS DEAL WITH AN OVERVIEW OF THE<br />

WORKSHOP GOALS, A NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR HEALTH<br />

CARE DELlVEA'1J IN CORRECTIONS, AN EXAMINATION OF<br />

HEALTH CARE DELIVERY SYSTEMS WITHIN CORRECTIONAL<br />

SET<strong>II</strong>NGS, AND A DISCUSSION OF THE USE AND ASSESS.<br />

MENT OF HEALTH CARE STANDARDS !N TERMS OF THEIR<br />

IMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH SERVICE. THE REMAINI~JG .SES­<br />

SIONS COVER SUPPORT SEAVICES NEEDED FOR EFFECTIVE<br />

HEALTH CARE DEliVeRY, IMPLICATIONS OF USING STAND.<br />

ARDS FOR PERSONNEL, MANAGING HEALTH CARE DELIV.<br />

ERY IN CORRECTIONS, IMPLEMENTING CHANGE IN CORREC­<br />

TiONAL INSTITUTIONS, CONTROLLING EXTERNAL INFLU.<br />

ENCES,.AND DEVELOPING ACTION PLA.~S FOR INSTITUTING<br />

CHANGES WITHIN THE CORRECTIONAL SETTING. SAMPLE<br />

FORMS ARE INCLUDED. AN EXERCISE IN DEVELOPING A<br />

COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK AMOI~G PRISON PERSoNNEL<br />

AND DECISION MAKERS IS APPENDED. SEE ALSO NCJ 47392<br />

AND 47393,<br />

'<br />

8uppilmenUi Hotea: FROM THE EXECUTIVE TRAINING PRO.<br />

GRAM IN ADVANCED CRIMINAL JUSTICE PRACTICES.<br />

Sponaorl,'1<strong>II</strong> Agency: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE<br />

OF DEVELOPMENT, TESTING AND DISSEMINATION, 633 INDI.<br />

ANA AVENUE, WASHINGTON DC 20531.<br />

Ava!llblllty: NCJRS MICROFICHE PROGRAM.<br />

63. HIGH SPEED PATROL CAA TIRES-A GUIDE. BV A. C.<br />

LEWIS end Eo LEWIS JA. US DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE<br />

NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS LAW ENFORCEMENT<br />

STANDARDS LABORATORY, WASHINGTON DC 20234: 42 p.<br />

1979. ~5t72t<br />

THIS GUIDE PROVIDES TECHNICAL INFORMATION FOR SE.<br />

lECTING TIRES TO SUIT THE NEEDS OF HIGH SPEED POLICE<br />

PURSUIT CARS, AND FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE TIRES FOR<br />

MAXIMUM SAFETY, TIRE LIFE, AND PERFORMANCE. THE<br />

COMPARATIVE DATA ON TIRE CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION,<br />

AND MAINTENANCE PRI:SENTED WERE COLLECTED FROM<br />

TESTS DONE TO EVALUATE COMPARATIVE TRACTION AND<br />

PERFORMANCE OF VARIOUS BRANDS AND SIZES OF HIGH<br />

SPEED PURSUIT TIRES. BASED ON INFORMATION COllECT.<br />

ED FROM A SURVEY OF POLICE DEPARTMENTS THROUGH.<br />

OUT THE COUNTRY BY THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION<br />

OF CHIEFS OF POLICE. USES FOR H!GH SPEED PURSUIT<br />

TIRES ARE DISCUSSED; I.E., TYPES OF ROADS DRIVEN, PUR.<br />

SUIT DRIVING, TIRE MAINTENANCE, HAZARD EXPOSURE,<br />

TYPES OF TIRES USED, TIRE MILEAGE, SNOW TIRE USAGE,<br />

ANt) ASPECTS OF RADIALS VERSUS SNOW TIRES. TECHNI.<br />

CAL FACTORS EXAMINED INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION, TIRE<br />

MARKINGS, TIRE MATERIALS, USE OF CHAINS, AND THE<br />

GASoLINE MIlEAGE OF CERTAIN TIRES. COST FACTORS,<br />

PRINCIPLES OF SELECTION, AND PERFORMANCE CRITERIA<br />

ARE DETAILED. OPERATIONAL ASPECTS SUCH AS INSTAlLA.<br />

TION, BREAKING IN THE TIRES, ROAD CONDITIONS, INFLA.<br />

TION CHECKS, ROTATION, REPAIRS, AND SERVICING ARE<br />

COVERED AS ESSENTIAL TO OPTIMAL TIRE SELECTION AND<br />

USE. {lIAGRAMS, GRAPHS, TABLES, AND PHOTOGRAPHS AC­<br />

COMPANY THE TEXT. THE FEDERAL QUALIFIED PRODUCTS<br />

lIST, A CHART FOR TIRE INTIERCHANGEABILlTY AND lOAD<br />

AND INFLATION DATA, AND A TIRE MIXING GUIDE ARE Ap.<br />

PENDED.<br />

IUppllmen'" HolM: A LIMITED NUMBER OF COPIES ARE<br />

AVAILABLE FROM NBS.<br />

~ Agency: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE lEM NA.<br />

TIONAl INSTITUTE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CRIMINAL<br />

JUSTICE, 633 INDIANA AVENUE NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20531-<br />

AV<strong>II</strong><strong>II</strong>bi<strong>II</strong>ty: GPO Stock Order No. 003-OO3.()2073.7· US DE.<br />

PARTMENT OF· COMMERCE NATIONAL BUREAU OF STAND.<br />

ARDS LAW ENFORCEMENT STANDARDS LABORATORY<br />

WASHINGTON DC 20234 Stock Order No. NBS SP 480.33:<br />

NCJRS MICROFICHE PROGRAM.<br />

'<br />

OF THE NIJ<br />

~, ILLEGAL CORPORATE IEHAVIOR. Iy. M. I. CUNARD, P. C.<br />

YEAGEA, J. IR<strong>II</strong>IETTE, D. PETRAlHEK, 8I1d E. HARRIES,<br />

UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF SOCIOLOGY,<br />

MADISON WI 53706. 348 p. 1979. NCJ.57n3<br />

FOCUSING ON SEVERAL HUNDRED MAJOR CORPOrIATIONS,<br />

THis STUDY REPRESENTS THE FIRST LAR,GE·SCAlE, COM·<br />

PREHENSIVE INVESTIGATION OF CORPORATIONS FOR AC­<br />

TIONS THAT VIOLATE THE LAW. ALTHOUGH THE EMPIRICAL<br />

INVESTIGATiON CONCENTRATED ON 582 OF THE LARGEST<br />

PUBl!CLY OWNED CORPORATIONS IN.THE U.S., THE MAJOR<br />

FOCUS WAS ONMANUrACTURING FIRMS WHOSE ANNUAL<br />

SALES (1875, RANGED FROM $300 MILLION TO MORE THAN<br />

$45 BILLION, WITH AN AVERAGE SALES VOLUME OF $1.7 BIL·<br />

liON. THE STUDY DATA COVERED ALL ENFORCEMENT AC­<br />

TIONS OBTAINABLE, ACTIONS INITIATED OR IMPOSED BY 24<br />

FEDERAL AGENCIES DURING 1975 AND 11176. THE DATA<br />

REVEAL A WIDE RANGE OF CORPORATE VIOLATIONS, AS<br />

WEll AS AorlON INITIATED AND IMPOSED BY GOVERNMENT<br />

AGENCIES. PREDICTIONS OF VIOLATIONS ARE ATlCMPTED<br />

THROUGH ANALYSES OFTEN USED TO COMPARE<br />

INDUSTRY·lEVEl AND ECONOMY·LEVEL DATA. THESE DATA<br />

SHOW THAT UNFAVORABLE TRENDS IN SALES, PROFITS,<br />

EARNINGS. AND PRODUCT DIVERSIFICATION AREl ASSOCIAT­<br />

ED WITli VIOLATIONS. A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS IS PRE·<br />

SENTED OF THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THOSE CORPORA·<br />

TIONS AGAINST WHICH LIMITED ACTIONS HAVE BEEN INITI·<br />

ATED AND THOSE "GAINST WHICH ACTIONS HAVE BEEN EX·<br />

TENSIVE. TO TEST THE VIEW THAT PRESSURES FROM<br />

PARENT CORPORATIONS TO INCREASE PROFITS CONTRIB·<br />

UTE TO THE GREATER VIOLATIONS BY SUBSIDIARIES, AC­<br />

TIONS AGAINST PARENT CORPORATIONS ARE COMPARED<br />

WITH ACTIONS AGAINST THEIR 101 LARGEST SUBSIDIARIES,<br />

WHOSE 1978 SALES RANGED FROM $300 MILLION TO $7.8<br />

BilLION. AN ANALYSIS IS PROVIDED OF THE METHODOLOG·<br />

ICAL PROBLEMS IN STUDYING CORPORATE CRIME AND THE<br />

INADEQUACY OF FEDERAL STATUTES ON CORPORATE<br />

CRIME. OTHER TOPICS DISCUSSED ARE CORPORATE ORGA·<br />

NI1.ATION AND CORPORATE CRIME, REGULATORY AGENCIES<br />

ANO ,FEDERAL AND STATE RELATIONS IN CONTROLLING<br />

CORpQR~TE CRIME, CORPORATE ANTITRUST AND ILLEGAL<br />

PAYMENTS VIOLATIONS, CORPORATE EXECUTIVES AND<br />

CRIMINAL LIABILITY, AND THE CONTROL OF CORPORATE<br />

CRIME. TABULAR DATA AND REFERENCES ARE PROVIDED.<br />

(AUTHOR ABSTRACT MODIFIED)<br />

SponIorIng Agency: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LEAA NA·<br />

TIONAL INSTITUTE OF· LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CRIMINAL<br />

JUSTICE, 633 iNDIANA AVENUE NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20531.<br />

Av8llablllty: GPO Stock Order No. 02NlOO.()()843·7; NCJRS<br />

MICROFICHE PROGRAM. NCJRS.<br />

65. IMPACT OF AFFIRMAnVE ACTION AND CIVIl. SERVICE ON<br />

AMERICAN POUCE PEASONNEL SYSTEMS. Iy H. O.<br />

LOCKE. PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION SERVICE, 1778 MASSA·<br />

CHUSETTS AVENUE, NW, WASHINGTON DC 20038. 19 p.<br />

1979. HCJ·H2116<br />

THE IMPACT OF CIVIL SERVICE AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION<br />

PROGRAMS ON MINORITY EMPLOYMENT IN THE LAW EN·<br />

FORCEMENT SETTING IS ADDRESSED IN THIS MONOGRAPH.<br />

EACH STAGE OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT'S PROGRAM<br />

TO INSURE EQUALEMPl0YMENT OPPORTUNITY FROM NON·<br />

DISCRIMINATION THROUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION HAS BEEN<br />

ACCOMPANIED BY ACRIMONIOUS PUBLIC DEBATE, FOCUS·<br />

ING PARTICULARLY ON AFrJRMATIVE ACTION WHICH IS DE·<br />

SIGNED TO DEVELOP GUIDELINES, TIMETABLES, AND OTHER<br />

MEASURABLE INDICES BY WHICH EMPLOYERS CAN BE HELD<br />

ACCOUNTABLE FOR THEIR P~OGRESS, OR LACK OF IT, IN<br />

IMPLEMENTING NATIONAL POLICY. THE PRINCIPAL BURDEN<br />

OF FINDING ANSWERS TO THE COMPLEX ISSUES SUR·<br />

ROUNDING MINORITY EMPLOYMENT HAS FALLEN TO THE<br />

COURTS. NUMEROUS JUDICIAL DECISIONS, WITH ENOR·<br />

MOUS IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICE AGENCiES, HAVE BEEN<br />

IMPROVING<br />

TRANSLATED INTO PROCEDURAL REGULATIONS COVERING<br />

THE MEASURES, TECHNIQUES, CRITERIA, AND 'PROCESSES<br />

THAT MAY BE USED FOR EMPLQYMENT DECISIONS AND EM·<br />

PlOYMENT SELECTION. ~VERAL EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES<br />

WHICH MAY CREATE PROBLEMS IN THE AREA OF EMPLOY·<br />

MENT DISCRIMINATION ARE INCLUDED. WHETHER DUE TO<br />

ENLIGHTENED POLICE I.EADERSHIP, COMMUNITY PRES­<br />

SURES, POLITICAL CIRCUMSTANCES, CIVil SERVICE INTER·<br />

'JENTION, OR A COMBINATION OF ALL l1iESE FACTORS, THE<br />

RACIAL CHARACTERISTICS OF AMERICAN?OLlCING HAVE<br />

BeGUN TO CHANGE SUBSTANTIALLY OVER THE PAST<br />

DECADE. TEN YEARS AGO, APPROXIMATELY 4 PERCENT OF<br />

THE SWORN POLICE PERSONNEL IN THE NATION WERE<br />

RACIAL MINORITIES: TODAY. THAT FIGURE HAS RISEN TO 10<br />

PERCENT. FINDINGS OF THE PUBLIC SERVICE ADMINISTRA·<br />

TION SHOW THAT ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT FACTORS<br />

IN CHANGING THE NATURE .AND QUALITY OF POLICING IS<br />

THE COURAGE AND COMMITMENT OF POLICE LEADERSHIP.<br />

TO THE EXTENT THAT INCREASING MINORITY AND FEMALE<br />

PARTICIPATION IN THE RANKS OF SWORN POLICE OFFICERS<br />

IS A CRUCIAL i'ART OF! THIS CHANGE PROCESS; THERE IS<br />

THE ACOED FINDING 1HAT SUCH EFFORTS ARE NOT EN·<br />

HANCED BY A RELIANCE ON THE REGULATORY ROLE OF<br />

CIVIL SERVICE. SEVERAL SUGGESTIONS FOR INSTITUTIONA·<br />

L1ZING THIS CHANGE PROCESS ARE NOTED. REFERENCE<br />

NOTES ARE APPENDED.<br />

IpoMorIng Agency: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE lEM NA·<br />

TIONAL INSTITUTE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CRIMI~JAL<br />

JUSTICE, 633 INDIANA AVENUE NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20531.<br />

Avllllblllty: GPO Stock Order No. 027-()()0'()08~.9; NCJRS<br />

MICROFICHE FROGRAM.<br />

/ • '<br />

/1<br />

H. IMPROVING THE CRIMIHAL PROCElSlHO.QF M<strong>II</strong>DEMEAH­<br />

ANTI-THE IMPROVED LOWEA COUAT/CASE HAHDUNQ<br />

PROGRAM-kALAMAZOO (kALAMAZOO COUNTY), MICHI­<br />

GAN-NATIONAL EVALUATION FINAL AEPORr. By E.<br />

CHEi.lMSlCY, M. FISCHEL, lind J. 1ASfY. MITRE CORPORA·<br />

TION WASHINGTON OPERATIONS, 1820 DOllEY MADISON<br />

BOULEVARD MCLEAN VA 22101. 112 p; 1978.<br />

, HCJ-4''J'"<br />

THE IMPROVED lOWER COURT CASS HANDLING (lLCCli)<br />

PROGRAM IN KALAMAZOO COUNTY, MICH., WAS EVALUATED<br />

AS PART OF A LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE ADMINIS·<br />

TAlmON EFFORT TO IMPROVE THE CASE IPROCESSING OF<br />

MISDEMEANANTS. EIGHT PROGRAM COMPONENTS WERE<br />

DESIGNED TO IMPROVE THE PROCESSING OF MISDEMEAN·<br />

ANT OFFENDERS. FOUR COMPONENTS OFFERED LAW EN·<br />

FORCEMENT AND JUDICIAL PERSONNEL lESS DRASTIC<br />

METHODS FOR HANDLING MISDEMEANANTS: POLICE CITA·<br />

TIONS, COURT SUMMONS, PRETRIAL RELEASE, AND SELECT<br />

OFFENDER PROBATION. THREE 'COMPONENTS WERE DE·<br />

SIGNED TO PROVIDE CONSISTENCY AND EFFICIENCY IN<br />

HANDLING MISDEMEANOR CASES: CASE SCREENING,<br />

PROMIS, AND SHORT FORM PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATION<br />

REPORTS. THE EIGHTH COMPONENT KNOWN AS THE MASS<br />

CASE COORDINATOR WAS DESIGNED TO FOSTER COOPERA·<br />

TICN AMONG PROGRAM COMPONENTS AND ACROSS CRIMI·<br />

NAL JUSTICE AGENCIES. THE ILCCH PROGRAM iN KALAMA·<br />

ZOO WAS UNIQUE IN MAINTAINING AN ACTIVE COORDINAT·<br />

ING COUNCil COMPOSED OF REPRESENTATIVES FROM<br />

CRIMINAL JUSTICE AGENCIES THROUGHOUT THE COUNTY. A<br />

UNIFORM CITATION FORM WAS DEVELOPED AND ADOPTED<br />

BY ALL POLICE AGENCIES. EFFORTS TO IMPLEMENT COURT<br />

SUMMONS FOR USE IN HANDLING CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS<br />

FAilED. A MISDEMEANOR PRETRIAL RELEASE PROGRAM<br />

WAS DEVELOPED TO EXTEND INTERVIEW/RECOMMENDA·<br />

TION SERVICES AVAILABLE TO FELONS TO MISDEMEAN·<br />

ANTS. SCREENING WAS CONDUCTED BY All. PROSECU·<br />

TIONAl AGENCIES IN THE COUNTY, so THE SCRI;EN!NG<br />

COMPONENT WAS DIRECTED TOWARD PROBLEMS ASSOCI·<br />

ATED WITH THE CONSISTENCY OF SCREENING AND CHARG·<br />

ING PRACTICES. A SEMIAUTOMATED INFOR,MATION SYSTEM<br />

;<br />

. \<br />

18<br />

"<br />

I<br />

. "<br />

.'"<br />

.~<br />

I

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!