IMPROVING PUBLICATIONS OF THE NIJ JAIL \ ., I .. ~,," flit -., WAS IMPLEMENTED THAT POSSESSED MANY FEATURES OF THEPAOMIS MODEL AND A WORD PROCESSING CAPABILITY. A COUNTYWIDE SHOAT FORM PRESENTENCE INVESTIGA· TION REPORT WAS NOT ADOPTED ElY PROBATION AGENCIES BECAUSE CONSENSUS ON THE NATURE OF THE FORM WAS NEVER REACHED. THE SELECT OFFENDER PROBATION COM· PONENT OPERATED AS AN ADJUNCT TO THE EXISTING PRO· BATION AGENCY IN KALAMAZOO; IT SERVED 33 CLIENTS SE· LECTED AS HIGH~RISK MISDEMEANANTS ACCORDING TO A SET OF FORMAL CRITERIA. THE COORDINATING COUNCIL, MORE THAN ANY PROGRAM COMPONENT, BROUGHT iN· CREASED VISIBILITY TO MISDEMEANANT PROCESSING AND DEMONSTRATED THAT AN INTERAGENCY APPROACH TO CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROBLEMS CAN RESULT IN COORDINAT· ED SOLUTIONS TO SYSTEM PROBLEMS. A DESCRIPTION OF THE CRIMINAL JUSTICi': SYSTEM IN KALAMAZOO COUNTY AND ,A WARRANT REQUEST AND DISPOSITION FORM ARE APPENDEO. .;, . AV<strong>II</strong><strong>II</strong>Ib<strong>II</strong><strong>II</strong>y: M!TRE CORPORATION WASHINGTON OPER. ATIONS, 1820 DOLLEY MADISON BOULEVARD, MCLEAN \fA " 221Q.1 Stock Order No. MTR·7682, VOL 2; NCJRS MICRO· FICHE PROGRAM. 57. IMPFlOViNG THE CRIMINAL PROCESSING OF MISOEMEAH. ANTS-THE 'MPROVED LOWER COURT CASE H»IDUNa PROOMM-LAS VEGAS (CLARK COUNTY), NEVADA-HA. TtOHAL EVALUATION-fiNAL REPORT. Iy E. CHEUMSKY &\lid J. SA9FY. MITRE CORPORATION WASHINGTON OPER· ATIONS, 1820 DOLLEY MADISON .BOULEVARD, MCLEAN VA 22101. 85 p. 1978. NCJ.4I41IS THE IMPROVED LOWER COURT CASE HANDLING (ILCCH) PROGRAM IN CLARK COUNTY, NEV., WAS EVALUATED AS PART OF A LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE ADMINISTRA. TION EFFORT TO IMPROVE THE CASE PROCESSING OF MIS. DEMEANANTS. THE ILCCH PROGRAM WAS INTENDED TO 1M. PROVE THE PROCESSING OF MISDEMEANANT OFFENDERS THROUGH THE IMPLEMENTATION AND OPERATION OF EIGHT PROGRAM COMPONENTS. FOUR OF THESE COMPONENTS OFFERED LAW ENFORCEMENT AND JUDICIAL PERSONNEL LESS DRASTIC METHQDS FOR HANDLING MISDEMEANANTS: POLICE CITATIONS, COURT SUMMONS, PRETRIAL RELEASE, AND SELECT OFFENDER PROBATION. THREE COMPONENTS WERE DESIGNED TO PROVIDE CONSISTENCY AND EFFICIEN. CY IN HANDLlN(1MISDEMEANOR CASES: CASE SCREENING, PROMIS, AND SHORT FORM PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATION REPORTS. THE EIGHTH COMPONENT kNOWN AS THE MASS CASE COORDINATOR WAS DESIGNED TO FOSTER COORDI. NATION AMONG T~E OTHER PROGRAM COMPONENTS AND ACROSS CRIMINAL'JUSTICE AGENCIES TO BETTER MANAGE CASE FLOW. 'A UNIFORM CITATION TICKET WAS DEVISED FOR USE BY ALL POLICE AGENCIES IN THE COUNTY, AND A UNIFORM SUMMONS WAS DEVELOPED FOR ALL PROSECU. TORIAL AGENCIES. PLANS TO DEVELOP FORMAL GUIDE. LINES FOR THE ISSUANCE OF THE UNIFORM SUMMONS FAILED BECAUSE JUDGES DID NOT WANl'TO REDUCE THEIR DISCRETION IN THE USE OF SUMMONS. A PRETRIAL RE. LEASE PROGRAM, OPERATED. BY A PRIVATE NONPROFIT OR. GANIZATION, WAS PART OF THE ILecH PROGRAM FOR 13 MONTHS. PROCEDURAL CHANGES WERE INSTITUTED IN CASE SCREENING TO GIVE A SCREENING UNIT, RATHER THAN POLlC!:, RESPONSIBILITY FOR FILING CHARGES IN MISDEMEANOR CASES. ILCCH PROGRAM FUNDS WERE USED TO ,CONTINUE THE DEVELOPMENT OF A MANAGE. MENT INFORMATION SYSTEM FOR THE DISTRICT ATTOR. NEY'S OFFICE. MISDEMEANANT PftOBATION IS NOT A LEGAL .OPTION IN NEV1IDA, SO PROBATION AND PRESENTENCE IN. '~,Si:IGATION COMPONENTS'W~Rr; IMPLEMENTED ~S PART ~ ,OF THE COURT COUNSELlr:!q.PR{)G~. THE ILCCH PRO. GRAM, IN GENERAL, WAS PLANNED ~ND EVOLVED COMPO. NENT BY COMPONENT. ANO'rHE MASS CASE COORDINATOR ROLE NEVER DEVELOPED THE ACTIVE COORDINATIVE'MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONS ENVISIONED BY 20 THE PROGRAM. NO MECHANISMS WERE DEVISED TO ANA· LVZE MISDEMEANANT PROCESSING PROBLEMS OR TO PRO· POSE CI.:>oRDINATED SOLUTIONS. THE ILCCH PROGRAM RE· SULTED IN SOME LOCALIZED IMPROVEMENTS, PRIMARILY PRETRIAL RELEASE AND COURT COUNSELING ELEMENTS. PROCEDURAL CHANGES AELAT,ED TO POLICE CITATIONS, COUR'r SUMMONS, AND CASE SCREENlf,oIG WERE INSTITU· TIONALIZED, AND A PROMIS SYSTEM NEARED COMPLETION. THE '':;RIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM IN CLARK COUNTY IS DE· SCRIBED IN AN APPENDIX. ~ Agency: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LAW EN· FORCEMENT ASSISTANCE ADMINISTRATION. ~~lib<strong>II</strong>Ity: MITRE CORPORATION WASHINGTON OPER· AT10NS, 1820 DOLLEY MADISON BOULEVARD. MCLEAN VA 22101 Stock Order No. MTR·7682, VOL 3i NCJRS MICRO· FICHE PROGRAM. sa. ' .. .PROVING THE CRIMINAL PROCESSING OF Il<strong>II</strong>DE<strong>II</strong>EAN AIm-THE IMPROVED LOWER COURT CASE HANDLING PROGRAM-RICHLAND COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA-NA TIONAL EVALUATION-FINAL REPORT. Iy E. CHEU<strong>II</strong>IKY, L OnEH. lind J. IAIFY. MITRE CORPORATION WASHING· TON OPERATIONS, 1820 DOLLEY MADISON BOULEVARD, MCLEAN VA 22101. 98 p. 1978. NCJ.414113 THE IMPROVED LOWER COURT CASE HANDLING (ILCCH) PROGRAM IN RICHLAND COUNTY, S.C., REPRESENTED A LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE ADMINISTRATION EFFORT TO IMPROVE THE CASE PROCESSING OF MISDEMEANANTS. THE ILecH PROGRAM WAS DESIGNED TO IMPROVE THE PROCESSING OF MISDEMEANANT OFFENDERS THROUGH THE IMPLEMENTATION OF EIGHT COMPONENTS. FOUR OF THE COMPONENTS OFFERED LAW ENFORCEMENT AND JU. DICIAL PERSONNEL LESS DRASTIC METHO[)'S FOR HAN. DLiNG MISDEMEANANTS: POLICE CITATIONS, COURT SUM. MONS, PRETRIAL RELEASE, AND SELECT OFFENDER PROBA. TION. THREE COMPONENTS WERE DESIGNED TO PROVIDE CONSISTENCY AND EFFICIENCY IN HANDLING MISDEMEAN. OR CASES: CASE SCREENING, PROMIS, AND SHORT FORM PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATION REPORTS. THE EIGHTH COM. PONENT KNOWN AS THE MASS CASE COORDINATOR WAS DESIGNED TO FOSTER COOPERATION AMONG PROGRAM COMPONENTS AND ACROSS CRIMINAL JUSTICE AGENCIES. NEITHER POLICE CITATION NOR COURT SUMMONS ALTER. NATIVES COULD BE IMPLEMENTED IN THE COUNTY BE. CAUSE STATE LAW DOES NOT ALLOW THEIR USE. THE PRE. TRIAL RE~EASE COMPONENT OP.ERATED AS A DISCRETION. ARY MECHANISM TO EFFECT RELEASE OF DEFENDANTS BASED ON A SET OF FORMAL AND INFORMAL CRITERIA. THE CASE SCREENING COMPONENT OPERATED TO IMPROVE THE TRANSMITTAL OF OFFENSE INFORMATION, AND AP. PROXIMATELY 33 PERCENT OF ~LL CASES WERE EVENTUAL. LY DISMISSED VIA SCREENING. PRIOR TO THE ILCCH PRO. GRAM, NO CASES HAD BEEN DISMISSED. ALTHOUGH THE ORIGINAL INTENT WAS TO DEVELOP A CROSS-JURISDICTIONAL INFORMATION SYSTEM ALONG THE LINES OF THE MANUAL PROMIS, THE COUNTY EVENTUALLY IMPLEMENTED A SIMPLIFIED CARD SYSTEM. JUDGES WERE NOT PARTICULARLY DISPOSED TOWARD THE USE OF PRE. SENTENCE INVESTIGATIONS, AND FEW PRESENTENCE IN. VESTIGATIONS WERE CONDUCTED. THE SELECT OFFENDER PROBATION COMPONENT WAS TERMINATED AS PART OF PROGRAM RESTRUCTURING. IT SUPERVISED 63 CLIENTS BUT SUFFERED BECAUSE IT FAILED TO INFORM JUDGES IN AN EFFECTIVE MANNER ABOUT THE ILCCH PROGRAM, TO DEVELOP A PROPOSED VOLUNTEER PROGRAM, AND TO IN. VOLVE THE LOCAL PROBATION DEPARTMENT. THE ILCCH PROGAAM IN RICHLAND COUNTY, IN GENERAL, FAILED TO MOVE BEYOND LIMITED IMPLEMENTATION, OPERATIONS AND INSTITUTIONALIZATION OF COMPONENTS ."ND DID NOT DEVELOP INTERAGENCY COORDINATION DUE TO INAD. EQUATE MANAGEMENT, LACK OF ANALYSIS AND PLANNING IN THE EARLY STAGES OF THE PROGRAM, AND LACK OF IN. TEREST BV AGENCIES IN COMPONENT C{)NCEPTS. A' DE· SCRIPl'lCN OF THE COUNTY'S CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM IS APPENDED.. .0;';>. AvllllMlllty: MITRE CORPORATION WASHINGTON OPER· 4~'" ATIONS 1820 DOLLEY MADISON BOULEVARD, MCLEAN VA 22101 'Stock Order No. MTR·7692. VOL1i NCJRS MICRO· FICHE PROGRAM. P. INCARCERATION AND ITS ALTUNATlVElIH 2O'1'H CENTURY AMERICA:" Iy D. J. ROTHMAN. 80. p. 1979. NCJ·5H14 THIS REPORT SURVEYS CONCEPTS AND TREATMENT OF THE DEVIANT IN THE U.S. FROM 187o.11MO. THE ORIGINS OF THE PROGRESSIVE REFORM MOVEM~NT IN THE CRIMINAL "USTICE AND MENTAL HEALTH FIELDS ARE ANALYZED. \iROM 1Il00 TO 1829 REFORMERS DEVOTED UNPRECEDENT· ED ATTENTION TO ALTERNATIVES TO INCARCeRATION. PRO· BATION, PAROLE, AND JUVENILE COURT PROCEDURES GAlt~ED ACCEPTANCE IN CRIMINAL ,IUSTICE, WHILE MENTAL HEALTH INNOVATIONS INCLUDED {)UTPATIENT CARE, AF· TERCARE, AND THE DESIGN OF AN ENTIRELY NEW TYPE OF FACILITY, THE PSYCHOPATHIC HOSPITAL T/:'IE PROGRAM THAT PROGRESSIVe REFORMERS peSIGNED IN THIS PERIOD REMAINED THE ESSENTIAL ,PROGRAM OF THE MIDDLE 1118O'S WHEN FUNOAMENTALr,CHALLENGES TO THE CONCEPTS OF PROGRESSIVE REFORM BEGAN TO DEVELOP. THIS REPORT CONTENDS THAT TO UNDERSTAND THESE CHALLENGES AN UNDERSTANDING OF' THE IDEOLOGICAL PREMISES OF THE OLDER PROGRA.MOF PROGRESSIVE REFORM IS .REQUIRED. THE REPORT ALSO FOCUSES ON THE RESULTS OF THE REFORM .EFFORT AND CONCLUDES THAT NONE OF THESE PROGRAMS WERE FULFILLED AS THEIR DESIGNERS HAD PLANNED. THUS, THE HISTORICAL REOORD IS RELEVANT TO THOSE WHO WOULD INNOVATE IN THESE FIELDS TODAY. THE LEGACY OF THE 1800'S IN REGARD TO INCARCERATION ".~,PRISONS AND INSANE ASY· LUMS IS DISCUSSED FOLLOW~D BY AN ANALYSIS OF THE ORIGINS AND REALITIES OF P~OB"TION AND PAROLE. THE PROGREsSIVE PRISON, THE ,CREATION OF THE JUVENILE COURT AND THE DISPENSING OF JUVENILE JUSTICE ARE CONSiDeRED, ALONG WITH A DISCUSSION OF THE FUTURE OF THE MENTAL HYGIENE MOVEMENT. FROM THIS ANALY· SIS, THAN: LINES OF THOUGHT EMERGE. FIRST, THIS RE· BEARel: IMPLIES THAT THE UNDERLYING ASSUMPTIONS OF THE l.ONGER APPEAA VALID. TODAY, EFFORTS FOCUS ON THE OVERT 'ACT', NOT THE 'STATE OF MIND', OF THE OF· FENDER. SECOND, THIS ANALYSIS SHOWS THAT ALTERNA· TIVES TO INSTITUTIONS CANNOT COEXIST EASILY WITH IN· STITUTIONS. A COMMITMENT TO ALTeRNATIVES TO INCAR· CERATION WILL DEMAND A THOROVGHGOING REVERSAL IN THE SOCIAL POLICY OF GIVING PRIORITY TO THE INCARCER· ATION OF OFFENDERS. FINALLY, THE HISTORICAL RECORD STRONGLY SUGGESTS THE DrFFICUL TY OF ADMINISTERING A PROGRAM THAT IS BOTH cUSTODIAL AND REHABILlTA· TIVE. NEVERTHELESS, IT IS coNTENDED THAT THE HISTORI· (,.AL APPROACH SHOULD HELP TO CREATE A CLIMATE OF IN· NOVATION IN FINDING NEW RESOLUTIONS TO INCARCER· ATION. A NOTE ON SOURCES IS APPENDED. 1ponIot'1I Agency: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LEM NA· TiONAlfNSTITUTE • OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE,833 INDIANA AVEN!,IE NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20531. AWl ....., GPO Stock Qrder No. 027.()OO.(10885-8i NCJRS MICROFICHE PROGRAM. , 10. INTIfINAnOiw.lUllllARlEI-A COLLECTION OF IEU!CT . ED TJIANILATIONI IN LAW ENfORCEMENT AND CRIMINAL JUIT/CIE, y~ I. NATIONAL CRIMINAL J,USTICC REFER· ENCE SERVICE BOX 8000, ROCKVILLE MD, 20850.' 171 p. 1879.' , .. NCJ-57117 TERRORISM IS THE THEME OF THIS THI~D VOLUME OF NCJRS INTERNATIONAL SUMMARIE;S. THE '9,~UMMARIES WERE SELECTED TO PROVIDE A WIDE RANGEPF INTERNA· 21 TIONAL OPINION AND DISCUSSION ON TERRORISM AND ITS MANIFESTATIONS. A GRAPHIC, DAY·BY·DAY ACCOUNT OF THE KIDNAPPING OF GERMAN INDUSTRALiST HANS MARTIN SCHLEYER AND THE SUBSEtlUENT HIJACKING OF A LUFTH· ANSA JET IS THE VOLUME'S LEAD ARTiCLE. ADAPTED FROM A RELEASE OF THE PRESS AND INFORMATION OFFICE OF THE WEST GERMAN GOVERNMENT, THIS CASE HISTORY RE· VIEWS THE GERMAN GOVERNMENT'S DELAY STRATEGY IN· TENDED TO GAIN MORE' TIME TO SEARCH AND .AVOID GRANTING THE TERRORISTS' DEMANDS. THE SECOND SEC TION IS DEVOTED TO SPECIFIC EXAMPLES OF TERRORISM IN VARIOUS AREAS OF THE WORLD. IN ADDITION TO DISCUS· SIONS OF THE HISTORY AND EVOLUTION OF TERRORISM IN LATIN AMERICA AND NORTHERN IRELAND, A DETAILED EX· AMINATION OF PALESTINIAN TERRORIST ORGANIZATIONS IS PRESENTED THAT FOCUSES ON THEIR ORIGINS, PHILOS· OPHIES, AND CONNECTIONS WITH OTHER GROUPS. A STUDY OF THE BACKGROUND AND IDEOLOGY OF WEST GERMAN TERRORISTS, THE REACTION OF THE GERMAN PEOPLE, AND GOVERNMENTAL ANTITERRORISM MEASURrES IS ALSO PROVIDED. THE FEMALE TERRORIST IS CONSID· ERED IN A PAIR OF WEST GERMAN ESSAYS THAT RELATE THE BEHAVIOR OF THE FEMALE TERRORIST TO HER WITH· DRAWAL FROM PRODUCTIVE SOCIETY, EXAMINF- HER LACK OF EMANCIPATION, AND DISCUSS HER PSYCHOLtJGlCAL DE· VELOPMENT AND REHABILITATION. THE NEXT GROUP OF ARTICLES RANGES FROM THEORETICAL STUDIES OF TER· RORIST DOCTRINE AND PRACTICE TO SPECIFIC COMMEN· TARIES ON WAYS TO COMBAT TERRORISM AND NEGOTIATE WITH TEARORISTS TO OBTAIN RELEASE OF HOSTAGES. A CRIMINOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF TERRORIST BEHAVIOR IS INCLUDED IN THIS SECTION, ALONG WITH A PERSPEC!'VE OF TERRORISM FROM AN EAST EUROPEAN COUNTRY, YU· GOSLAVIA. LEGAL ASPECTS OF TERRORISM AND ANTITER· RORISM ARE DISCUSSED IN SELECTIONS THAT REVIEW BEL· GIAN, ITALIAH, AND WEST GERMAN LEGISLAT~ON AND PENAL CODES DEAl,ING WITH TERRORISTS AND TERRORIST ACTS. THE SUMMARIES CONCLUDE WITH TWO PAPERS ON INTERNATIONAL ANTITERRORISM EFFORTS BY THE UNITED NATIONS AND INTERNATIONAL ANTITERRORIST "GRElE: MENTS FROM THE 1937 GENEVA CONVENTION TO THE 191'.' COUNCIL OF EUROPE CONVENTION. 1IpoMor'1I Agency: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LEAA NA· TIONALiNSTITUTE'OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE 633 INDIANA AVENUE NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20531. AV......itr. NCJRS MICROFICHE PROGRAM. NCJRS. Ii JAIL lASED INMATE PROQRAMS-A SELECTED <strong>II</strong>IUOGRA· • PHY. M. LEVINE lind M. KRAVITZ, Ecia. NATIONAL CRIMI· NAL JUSTICE REFERENCE SERVICE, BOX 6000, ROCKVILLE MD 20850. 28 p. 1979. HCHC331 THIS ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY FOR CORRECTIONS rER· SONNEL INCLUDES SECTIONS ON JAIL MANAGEMENT AND MINIMUM STANDARDS, BROAD-BASED PROGRAM DESIGNS, AND HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WORK·RELEASE PROGRAMS. CURRENT AVAILABLE EVIDENCE SHOWS THAT 36 PERCENT OF ALL INOIVIDUALS INCARCERATED IN THE UNITED STATES ARE HELD IN LOCAL JAILS. TO EFFECTIVELY TREAT IN· MATES, THESE JAILs SHOULD HAVE PROGRAMS OF SUFFI· CIENT LENGTH AND C.ONTINUITY. Al.THOUGH NOT ALL COM· MUNITIES VIEW THE JAIL AS A P~CE FOR TREATMENT, SEV· ERAL INNOVATIVE PROGRAM DESIGNS HAVE BEEN DEVEL· OPED THAT SERVE AS A BRIDGE BETWEEN CONFINEMENT AND FREEDOM. THiS BIBLIOGRAPHY HAS BEEN COMPILED TO PROVIDE AN OVERVIEW OF WHAT HAS BEEN ATTEMPTED AND ACCOMPLISHED IN THE FIELD. CITATIONS ARE AR· RANGED BY TOPIC AND COVER PRINCIPLES AND STAND· ARDS FOR EFFECTIVE JAIL OPERATIONS, DESCRIPTIOi"S OF PROGRAMS WITH MULTITREATMENT ELEMENTS, I'CCOUNTS OF PROGRAMS DESIGNED SPECIFICALLY FOR FEMALE OF· FENDERS, ANALYSES OF THE NEED FOR HEALTH AND MEDI· , .,
~UROR PUBUCATIONS OF THE NIJ NATIONAL • CAL. PROGRAMS, MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR NUTRITION, SUBSTANCE ABUSE; AND MEDICAL CARE, DESCRIPTIONS OF ACADEMIC, VOCATIONAl: SKIl:l:, WORK RELEASE, AND JOB PLACE.MJ:NT PROGRAMS. STATE·OF·THE·ART DOCUMENTS ~,EGARDING AMERICAN JAIL SYSTEMS, AND SUGGESTIONS FOR CHANGE, INCLUDiNG ALTERNATIVES TO INCARCER. ATION. ,ALL DOCUME~TS CITED IN THIS BIBLIOGRAPHY HAVE BEEN SELECTED FROM THE NCJRS DATA BASE. EACH C/TA. TION INCLUDES AN ABSTRACT; INFORMATION IS INCLUDED ON OBTAINING THESE DOCUMENTS, AND AN AUTHOR INDEX IS APPENCE/? Ii s,a"... A88fICY: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LEAA NA. T/ONAl INSTlrUTE OF LAW ENFORCEM1;NT AND CRIMINAL JU$TICE, 633 INDIANA AVl;ff;)E NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20531- ~V<strong>II</strong><strong>II</strong><strong>II</strong>b<strong>II</strong>Ity: GPO. Stock Or~ No. 027.()()O.{)088.C-4. NCJRS. '2. JUROR RESPONsE TO PRER£CORD£D "'D£OTAP£ TRIAlS. IJJ E. <strong>II</strong>. RO<strong>II</strong>£RTSoN. US DEPAFlTMENT OF COMMERCE • NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS LAW ENFORCEMENT STANDARDS LABORATORY, WASHINGTON DC 20234. 30 p. 1979. NCJ.5t301 AN ANALYSIS IS "ROVIDED OF RESPONSES TO AN ATTITU. DlNlJ, OUESTIONNAIRE RETURNED BY 278 JURORS WHO PARTICIPATED IN PRERECORDED VIDEOTAPED (PAVTT) CIvil TAIALS CONDUCTED IN OHIO IN 1975 AND 1978. OHIO WAS THE FIRST STATE TO EXTEND THE USE OF VIDEOTAPE BEYOND THE RECORDING OF DEPOSITIONS. THE FIRST 'OF .MANY PAVTT'S WAs HELD IN THE SANOUSKY, OHIO, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS ON NOVEMBER 18, 1971. THE TRIALS TO WHICH THIS APPROACH WAS APPLIED DIFFERED FROM 00. DiNARY TRIALS IN TWO MAJOR RESPECTS: (1) THE WIT. NESSES' TESTIMONY HAD BEEN PRERECORDED FOR TRIAL PRESENTATION. TO EVALUATE JUROR ACCEPTANCE, A "·PAGE F~M CONTAINING 24 QUESTIONS (APPENDED) WAS MAILED TO EACH MEMBER 0.
- Page 1 and 2: (j. "\ ~, If you have issues viewin
- Page 3 and 4: ,'j. \,'-- ~I () l l' TABLE 9FCONTE
- Page 5 and 6: "1 C ,,' ¢. c ') c, " =--~=. '.::.
- Page 7 and 8: . '~""....,."....,.,..,."..0"":,...
- Page 9 and 10: " ARSON PUBLICATIONS OF THE NIJ CAT
- Page 11 and 12: 1- , D'UBLICATIONS OFTHENIJ CORRUPT
- Page 13 and 14: .c~~. . . < - ~,,~, " ' ~~ ____ ._~
- Page 15 and 16: ~j ( " '" ,'. ,. ..... () , EXEilPL
- Page 17: HEALTH PUIJLlCATIONS -- , i , - -.,
- Page 21 and 22: ,.~ ".."~..,_ ~."",'.~-,,. ~,L'."·
- Page 23 and 24: __--______ ~~--____________ _~-----
- Page 25 and 26: 2 ) , , OF THE NIJ TEAM , . " .. ,
- Page 27 and 28: G -~.,~, - ...-' .::: .. ~' J- ;:;-
- Page 29 and 30: , ,; " \, '. ,', ," (\ ! I I , J A.
- Page 31 and 32: r ,.' , r, ',' f ; , " ~'~ ~. '. ,1
- Page 33 and 34: ,- , D. NATIONAL EVALUATION PROGRAM
- Page 35 and 36: ;~. :-~. " . u .... ----- .,•. rl
- Page 37 and 38: POi .' ~ . '''' , J " . r 1 ' AUTHO
- Page 39: " 1 '" U.S. Department of Justice N
Change language