18.05.2014 Views

Final Report - European Commission - Europa

Final Report - European Commission - Europa

Final Report - European Commission - Europa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

- the Delegation appears over-centralised and hierarchical. Individual advisors<br />

should be given substantially greater autonomy and decision-making powers, and<br />

be held accountable for the results.<br />

- The Delegation should strengthen its resources for strategic and economic<br />

analysis. Economists should be recruited for the Albania programme both at the<br />

Delegation and Headquarters. Technical support from other DGs in the<br />

<strong>Commission</strong> (e.g. for example DG Development on programming and sector<br />

wide approaches) is also recommended.<br />

27. Formal and transparent investigation of reported past financial irregularities. As<br />

described, poor implementation is central to the low impact of the EC programme. The<br />

financial irregularities identified in the reviews commissioned by the Delegation should<br />

be investigated by Headquarters or externally (Court of Auditors).<br />

28. Cooperation between Delegation and Headquarters. Poor cooperation between<br />

Delegation and Headquarters is a central issue identified by this Evaluation affecting past<br />

and future programme impact. Management action to improve cooperation is required.<br />

29. Monitoring, evaluation and audits.<br />

• Monitoring and assessment reports should continue, but should be shorter and more<br />

focused on strategic issues (e.g. a move towards the TACIS model should be avoided). It<br />

should also identify more clearly the actors responsible for poor implementation. To<br />

increase transparency, reports should be made public.<br />

• Systematic and independent evaluations of the Phare programme and budget support<br />

should be carried out (only Delegation commissioned ad-hoc reviews have been carried<br />

out). An independent evaluation of the Customs programme is especially needed.<br />

• EC programmes should be rigorously and systematically audited (when necessary by<br />

internationally recognised auditors). Sanctions should be applied in cases of<br />

maladministration.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!