Parachutt" Inilustrl lssricirltim - Parachute Industry Association
Parachutt" Inilustrl lssricirltim - Parachute Industry Association
Parachutt" Inilustrl lssricirltim - Parachute Industry Association
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
I..lINUTES PIA MEETING USPA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR ADDRESS TO PIA:<br />
TEMPE, ARIZONA<br />
ocroBER 22, 23 & 24, 1993<br />
USPA RECOGNIZED EARLY THIS YEAR THAT FAA WAS CONSIDERING CHANGING<br />
PART 105 TO ACCOMODATE TANDEM PARACHUTES. HERETOFORE THEY HAD<br />
BEEN OPERATING UNDER WAIVERS FOR BOTH THE MANUFACTURERS OF THE<br />
EQUIPMENT. THIS HAS BEEN GOING ON NOW FOR ABOUT TEN YEARS AND<br />
THE FAA WAS UNDER SOME PRESSURE TO STOP REGULATING BY INJUNCTION<br />
AND TO MAKE AN EFFECTIVE CHANGE IN 105 THAT WOULD REGULARIZE THE<br />
S ITUATION .<br />
WHEN USPA FOUND OUT THEY WERE GOING TO REGULATE TANDEUM THEY<br />
ASKED THE FAA WHAT WOULD BE THE REQUIREMENT FOR SUBI'IITTING THEIR<br />
OI^JN PROPOSAL FOR THIS. FAA ADVISED THAT IF USPA COULD PROVIDE<br />
THEM A PROPOSAL BY THE FIRST OF JANUARY, IT COULD CONCEIVABLY<br />
COULD GO THROUGH FAA'S PROCESSES IN TIME TO BE II'IPLEMENTED AND<br />
OPERATIONAL BY THE TIME THE EXEI"IPTION EXPIRED AT THE END OF JUNE,<br />
1994.<br />
USPA I4EET WITH THE FAA AND BOTH THE TANDEI"I MANUFACTURERS IN<br />
ALEX"II{DRIA IN JUNE AND DISCUSSED WHAT NEEDED TO BE DONE TO GO<br />
FORWARD ON A PROJECT THAT WOULD ALLOW THEM TO EFFECT THE LANGUAGE<br />
OF THE CHANGE. THEY PUT TOGETHER A PROPOSAL PROJECT TEAM TO<br />
WRITE A PROPOSAL TO REPRESENT THE CONCENSUS OF ALL INVOLVED AND<br />
BE PRESENTED TO THE FAA TO EFFECT THE RULE CHANGE.<br />
THEY ADOPTED THE AVIATION RULE MAKING ADVISORY P1ODEL WHICH<br />
ALLOWS PARTICIPATION BY INDUSTRY GROUPS AND ALLOWS FAA TO MAKE<br />
USE OF THAT PARTICIPATION IN FORMING NEW RULES.<br />
THE MODEL WAS THERE SHOULD BE PARTICIPATION BY BOTH THE<br />
MANUFACTURES, THE USPA, THE FAA AND USERS IN THE FIELD. THUS<br />
THEY HAD ONE DELEGATE FROM EACH OF THE T!'IO }4ANUFACTURERS<br />
PRESENTLY I"lAKING EQUIPI.{ENT, DELEGATES FROM TWO MANUFACTURERS WHO<br />
HAD EXPRESSED INTEREST AS I.{ANUFACTI]RERS IN THE FUTURE, DELEGATES<br />
FROM THE FIELD WHO USED TANDEUI"I IN THEIR INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAI'{S<br />
AND A DELEGATE FROM THE USPA.<br />
HAD FIVE MEETINGS IN FIVE DIFFERENT AREAS SCHEDULED AND THEY HAVE<br />
NOW COMPLETED FOUR OF THE MEETINGS. THE RESULTS SO FAR IS THEY<br />
ARE PUTTING TOGETHER RECOMMENDATIONS REFLECTING THE VIEWS OF ALL<br />
THE VARIOUS PEOPLE INVOLVED AND A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE FAA HAS<br />
ATTENDED ALL OF THE I"IEETING EXCEPT THE LAST ONE. THEY HAVE HAD<br />
INPUT FROM PIA, USPA AND FAA AND ARE OPERATING BY CONCENSUS.<br />
THERE ARE TWO DRAFT PROPOSALS...ONE INSTRUCTOR PROPOSAL AND A<br />
STUDENT PROPOSAL ,BOTH DOWN ON PAPER. THE PROPOSAL WILL GO TO<br />
THE USPA BOARD IN DECEMBER AND THEY WILL VOTE ON IT,AND SUGGEST<br />
ANY CHANGES THEY FEEL SHOULD BE INCORPORATED. JERRY ENCOURAGED<br />
ANYONE INTERESTED TO ATTEND THAT MEETING.<br />
THEY ARE ADDRESSING A REAL NEED, AND THAT IS THE NEED TO REGULATE<br />
THE TANDEI"I SYSTEM AND ITS INCLUSION IN THE INDUSTRY.