24.05.2014 Views

Parachutt" Inilustrl lssricirltim - Parachute Industry Association

Parachutt" Inilustrl lssricirltim - Parachute Industry Association

Parachutt" Inilustrl lssricirltim - Parachute Industry Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

I..lINUTES PIA MEETING USPA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR ADDRESS TO PIA:<br />

TEMPE, ARIZONA<br />

ocroBER 22, 23 & 24, 1993<br />

USPA RECOGNIZED EARLY THIS YEAR THAT FAA WAS CONSIDERING CHANGING<br />

PART 105 TO ACCOMODATE TANDEM PARACHUTES. HERETOFORE THEY HAD<br />

BEEN OPERATING UNDER WAIVERS FOR BOTH THE MANUFACTURERS OF THE<br />

EQUIPMENT. THIS HAS BEEN GOING ON NOW FOR ABOUT TEN YEARS AND<br />

THE FAA WAS UNDER SOME PRESSURE TO STOP REGULATING BY INJUNCTION<br />

AND TO MAKE AN EFFECTIVE CHANGE IN 105 THAT WOULD REGULARIZE THE<br />

S ITUATION .<br />

WHEN USPA FOUND OUT THEY WERE GOING TO REGULATE TANDEUM THEY<br />

ASKED THE FAA WHAT WOULD BE THE REQUIREMENT FOR SUBI'IITTING THEIR<br />

OI^JN PROPOSAL FOR THIS. FAA ADVISED THAT IF USPA COULD PROVIDE<br />

THEM A PROPOSAL BY THE FIRST OF JANUARY, IT COULD CONCEIVABLY<br />

COULD GO THROUGH FAA'S PROCESSES IN TIME TO BE II'IPLEMENTED AND<br />

OPERATIONAL BY THE TIME THE EXEI"IPTION EXPIRED AT THE END OF JUNE,<br />

1994.<br />

USPA I4EET WITH THE FAA AND BOTH THE TANDEI"I MANUFACTURERS IN<br />

ALEX"II{DRIA IN JUNE AND DISCUSSED WHAT NEEDED TO BE DONE TO GO<br />

FORWARD ON A PROJECT THAT WOULD ALLOW THEM TO EFFECT THE LANGUAGE<br />

OF THE CHANGE. THEY PUT TOGETHER A PROPOSAL PROJECT TEAM TO<br />

WRITE A PROPOSAL TO REPRESENT THE CONCENSUS OF ALL INVOLVED AND<br />

BE PRESENTED TO THE FAA TO EFFECT THE RULE CHANGE.<br />

THEY ADOPTED THE AVIATION RULE MAKING ADVISORY P1ODEL WHICH<br />

ALLOWS PARTICIPATION BY INDUSTRY GROUPS AND ALLOWS FAA TO MAKE<br />

USE OF THAT PARTICIPATION IN FORMING NEW RULES.<br />

THE MODEL WAS THERE SHOULD BE PARTICIPATION BY BOTH THE<br />

MANUFACTURES, THE USPA, THE FAA AND USERS IN THE FIELD. THUS<br />

THEY HAD ONE DELEGATE FROM EACH OF THE T!'IO }4ANUFACTURERS<br />

PRESENTLY I"lAKING EQUIPI.{ENT, DELEGATES FROM TWO MANUFACTURERS WHO<br />

HAD EXPRESSED INTEREST AS I.{ANUFACTI]RERS IN THE FUTURE, DELEGATES<br />

FROM THE FIELD WHO USED TANDEUI"I IN THEIR INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAI'{S<br />

AND A DELEGATE FROM THE USPA.<br />

HAD FIVE MEETINGS IN FIVE DIFFERENT AREAS SCHEDULED AND THEY HAVE<br />

NOW COMPLETED FOUR OF THE MEETINGS. THE RESULTS SO FAR IS THEY<br />

ARE PUTTING TOGETHER RECOMMENDATIONS REFLECTING THE VIEWS OF ALL<br />

THE VARIOUS PEOPLE INVOLVED AND A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE FAA HAS<br />

ATTENDED ALL OF THE I"IEETING EXCEPT THE LAST ONE. THEY HAVE HAD<br />

INPUT FROM PIA, USPA AND FAA AND ARE OPERATING BY CONCENSUS.<br />

THERE ARE TWO DRAFT PROPOSALS...ONE INSTRUCTOR PROPOSAL AND A<br />

STUDENT PROPOSAL ,BOTH DOWN ON PAPER. THE PROPOSAL WILL GO TO<br />

THE USPA BOARD IN DECEMBER AND THEY WILL VOTE ON IT,AND SUGGEST<br />

ANY CHANGES THEY FEEL SHOULD BE INCORPORATED. JERRY ENCOURAGED<br />

ANYONE INTERESTED TO ATTEND THAT MEETING.<br />

THEY ARE ADDRESSING A REAL NEED, AND THAT IS THE NEED TO REGULATE<br />

THE TANDEI"I SYSTEM AND ITS INCLUSION IN THE INDUSTRY.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!