02.06.2014 Views

2008 PROCEEDINGS - Public Relations Society of America

2008 PROCEEDINGS - Public Relations Society of America

2008 PROCEEDINGS - Public Relations Society of America

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Concerned that its sexual harassment training approach couldn’t pass legal muster, the<br />

state <strong>of</strong> Illinois in 2006 forced thousands <strong>of</strong> employees to retake the course because records<br />

showed they had completed the training in as little as 10 minutes.<br />

Effectiveness <strong>of</strong> courses can be difficult to measure, however, especially since most<br />

vendors don’t track test or quiz results. That’s by customer design; at least some employers fear<br />

that poor employee test scores could be used against them by a plaintiff building a hostile<br />

workplace case.<br />

“There are published cases where training is scrutinized by a judge and a jury,” says<br />

Atkins. “Ten years ago they asked, ‘Did you do the training?’ Today they are asking ‘How did<br />

you do it, and what did you use?’ ”<br />

Atkins said that to pass muster in court, training programs should be at least 30 minutes<br />

long, contain enough content and interactivity to make the estimated times real, and use realistic<br />

scenarios and hypothetical situations.<br />

“If employees can blast through the training quickly, they will,” Atkins said. “It’s human<br />

nature.”<br />

Methodology<br />

The authors first conducted a DELPHI study with twelve human resource managers to<br />

arrive at a consensus on three issues with respect to e-learning. Respondents participated in three<br />

rounds <strong>of</strong> questions for purposes <strong>of</strong> this study. In round one, respondents were asked to provide<br />

their answer to the question in list form. In the second round, the authors gave respondents a<br />

complete list <strong>of</strong> all answers for each question. Respondents then rank ordered the answers<br />

beginning with their highest ranked answer to their lowest ranked answer. In the third round, the<br />

authors sent respondents the tabulated results from the second round. They were asked to re-rank<br />

the responses to see if any changes occurred.<br />

The questions respondents replied to are as follows:<br />

1) What are the primary reasons that companies now use e-learning as part <strong>of</strong> their human<br />

resources training program?<br />

2) With respect to learning effectiveness, what benefits do participants receive from e-<br />

learning?<br />

3) What, if any, problems do organizations encounter with e-learning?<br />

After completing the DELPHI study, the authors conducted a series <strong>of</strong> personal interviews<br />

with human resources pr<strong>of</strong>essionals in both the United States and England. Respondents<br />

were asked a series <strong>of</strong> questions to determine their feelings toward e-learning and to see how<br />

it fits into their organization’s business model.<br />

Results<br />

As an answer to the question regarding primary reasons for using e-learning as part <strong>of</strong> their<br />

human resource training program, respondents listed the following in rank order:<br />

1) E-learning saves time because participants do not have to be pulled from their job to<br />

participate. E-learning participants can receive training in short blocks <strong>of</strong> time during lunch<br />

breaks or at times before and after work.<br />

2) E-learning is a cost-effective way to deliver training, especially for exempt employees<br />

because they are not separated from daily activities and may elect to receive training<br />

outside <strong>of</strong> the workplace.<br />

3) Training works well in intervals thereby improving retention and satisfaction.<br />

121

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!