06.06.2014 Views

Tsunami evacuation: Lessons from the Great East Japan earthquake ...

Tsunami evacuation: Lessons from the Great East Japan earthquake ...

Tsunami evacuation: Lessons from the Great East Japan earthquake ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2012<br />

In Ishinomaki, we observed a map which focussed on <strong>the</strong> local landslide hazard and<br />

<strong>evacuation</strong> routes designed for landslide only (Figure 31). This map shows <strong>evacuation</strong><br />

routes to shelters which are away <strong>from</strong> steep hillsides, but encourage <strong>evacuation</strong> into areas<br />

close to <strong>the</strong> banks of <strong>the</strong> Kitakami River. On March 11 th 2011, <strong>the</strong> specified <strong>evacuation</strong><br />

shelters were inundated by tsunami flow <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> river channel. This illustrates <strong>the</strong> need for<br />

information boards and signs to include multiple hazards where this is appropriate.<br />

Figure 31<br />

Landslide hazard and <strong>evacuation</strong> map on an information board in Ishinomaki City.<br />

2.3 Response to natural and informal tsunami warnings<br />

2.3.1 Natural warnings<br />

The officials interviewed in Tarō, Kesennuma, Minami-Sanriku and Natori reported that<br />

ground shaking lasted longer than 2 minutes (most reported as long as 3 minutes) and in<br />

Kesennuma, Minami-Sanriku and Ishinomaki <strong>the</strong> interviewees acknowledged that this<br />

<strong>earthquake</strong> felt unusual or stronger than <strong>the</strong>y had ever experienced previously (including<br />

previous Miyagi-ken-oki events in 1978 and 2004). Most interviewees, when questioned<br />

fur<strong>the</strong>r, felt that <strong>the</strong>y could have stood up in <strong>the</strong> <strong>earthquake</strong> and that ‘stronger’ generally<br />

referred to <strong>the</strong> length of shaking and <strong>the</strong> long and variable period of <strong>the</strong> shaking. As a result<br />

of <strong>the</strong> ground shaking, <strong>the</strong>y recognised that this could be <strong>the</strong> recurrent Miyagi-ken-oki event<br />

and <strong>the</strong>re was recognition of <strong>the</strong> potential for tsunami. The JMA shaking intensity at each<br />

location is given in Table 3. Drawdown of <strong>the</strong> tsunami was only cited in our interview at<br />

Minami-Sanriku.<br />

Public response to <strong>the</strong> natural warning of strong and long ground shaking was variable. In<br />

Tarō, most people in <strong>the</strong> town are believed to have evacuated in response to ground shaking<br />

and although an audible tsunami warning was broadcast by <strong>the</strong> disaster prevention officials,<br />

this was broadcast while people were already running. Tarō Town officials describe a history<br />

of strong communication of tsunami risk <strong>from</strong> parents to children, with a tradition of telling<br />

stories about tsunami, education in school on tsunami including communication on <strong>the</strong><br />

subject between local and visiting schoolchildren. The official himself told us how he was<br />

often told as a child to “run straight away, even if <strong>the</strong> ground shaking is small” in an<br />

<strong>earthquake</strong>. Local tradition in Minami-Sanriku encourages <strong>evacuation</strong> <strong>from</strong> coastal areas<br />

GNS Science Report 2012/17 25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!