12.06.2014 Views

March 1, 2012 Page 1 AGENDA TOWN OF RICHMOND HILL ...

March 1, 2012 Page 1 AGENDA TOWN OF RICHMOND HILL ...

March 1, 2012 Page 1 AGENDA TOWN OF RICHMOND HILL ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>March</strong> 1, <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Page</strong> 23<br />

East:<br />

West:<br />

Residential Uses<br />

Residential Uses<br />

CIRCULATED DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES COMMENTS RECEIVED<br />

Arborist:<br />

No response.<br />

Building Department/Zoning Section:<br />

By-Law Enforcement:<br />

Development Engineering:<br />

Finance:<br />

The requested variances are correct.<br />

No response.<br />

No concerns or objections.<br />

Not circulated.<br />

Parks:<br />

As per your request we have reviewed the drawings and have the following comments:<br />

1. The owner should note that they must comply with the Tree Preservation By-law No. 41-07 as it<br />

applies.<br />

2. The owner should note that they must comply with the Street Tree Bylaw No. 40-07, as it relates to<br />

Town trees fronting the property<br />

3. Any new lots will be subject to parkland dedication at the time of building permit.<br />

4. Tree #419 is recommended for removal due to its hazardous conditions, which we have no objection<br />

to. However, we note that the tree is located on the property boundary with the adjacent home owner<br />

and highly recommend that the applicant discuss the tree's removal prior to the commencement of<br />

any work as it may affect the surrounding privacy fence.<br />

Planning:<br />

The owner of the subject lands is seeking to vary the provision for maximum lot coverage under Bylaw<br />

2523-60, as amended from 30% to 32% to facilitate the construction of a two-storey, single<br />

family dwelling.<br />

The subject lands are zoned “Third Density Residential (R3)” Zone under By-law 2523-60, as<br />

amended. This by-law regulates the size of dwellings based on lot coverage rather than maximum<br />

gross floor area to allow homes to be developed proportionately with lot size. It should be noted that<br />

the total lot coverage of the proposed dwelling is 35%, however By-law 100-10 removes both covered<br />

and uncovered porches from the calculation of lot coverage, resulting in a net coverage of 32%.<br />

Planning staff has reviewed the owner’s proposal and would recommend that the Minor Variance<br />

application be approved since the requests are considered to be in keeping with the intent of both<br />

the Official Plan and Zoning By-law for the area, the requests are considered to be minor in nature<br />

and are considered to be appropriate for the development of area in which the subject lands are<br />

located.<br />

H.R.H.:<br />

PowerStream Inc.:<br />

Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc.:<br />

Bell Canada:<br />

York Region Transportation & Works Department:<br />

(Design & Construction Branch)<br />

York Region District School Board:<br />

Not circulated.<br />

No objections.<br />

Not circulated.<br />

No response.<br />

No response.<br />

Not circulated.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!