Application of New Pedestrian Level of Service Measures - sacog
Application of New Pedestrian Level of Service Measures - sacog
Application of New Pedestrian Level of Service Measures - sacog
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Application</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>Pedestrian</strong> <strong>Level</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Service</strong> <strong>Measures</strong><br />
SACOG<br />
9. Potential Variables for Regional<br />
Collection<br />
In order to incorporate measures <strong>of</strong> pedestrian LOS into future SACOG modeling efforts, it<br />
will be necessary to collect, at the regional level, data inputs that affect pedestrian LOS.<br />
Because <strong>of</strong> the magnitude <strong>of</strong> such an undertaking, not all variables that affect pedestrian<br />
LOS can be collected. To remedy this, one <strong>of</strong> the main goals <strong>of</strong> this study was to identify the<br />
most important variables that can be collected regionally. These variables are listed and<br />
described below. While SACOG endeavors to collect and monitor as many <strong>of</strong> these variables<br />
as possible, the ability to do so largely depends on securing grant funding and leveraging<br />
local partnerships. Hence, these measures represent potential variables for regional<br />
collection.<br />
Although some measures, such as number <strong>of</strong> conflicts with other modes, were found to be<br />
significant determinants <strong>of</strong> pedestrian LOS, not all measures are appropriate for regional<br />
collection. For example, the cost <strong>of</strong> identifying all <strong>of</strong> the points <strong>of</strong> conflict between<br />
pedestrians and automobiles makes that variable all but impossible to collect at the regional<br />
level. Therefore, the measures we have identified below are not only significant variables,<br />
but also ones that SACOG feels would be feasible to collect regionally.<br />
1. Presence and condition <strong>of</strong> sidewalks<br />
The presence and condition <strong>of</strong> sidewalks was heavily weighted in both the PPM and<br />
MMLOS models. Key considerations with this variable include: is there a sidewalk? Is the<br />
sidewalk continuous? How wide is the sidewalk? Are there obstructions on the sidewalk<br />
like utility poles or traffic light poles? Does the sidewalk have noticeable cracking or an<br />
uneven surface? Does the sidewalk include curb cuts?<br />
2. Traffic volumes<br />
<strong>Pedestrian</strong>s are more comfortable walking on streets with low traffic volumes. The<br />
greater the number <strong>of</strong> vehicles a pedestrian encounters when crossing the street, the<br />
greater the potential for conflict between pedestrians and vehicles. SACOG already<br />
maintains traffic volume data for some <strong>of</strong> the region’s roadways, and many local<br />
jurisdictions maintain this data for their own communities. Of all the significant variables<br />
identified, traffic volume is the only one that changes throughout the day. Although<br />
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) was used in the PPM and MMLOS models, collecting peak<br />
hour and ADT volumes would allow for measurement <strong>of</strong> pedestrian LOS during the<br />
highest volume times <strong>of</strong> the day (morning and evening rush hour) and during midday.<br />
3. Buffers between vehicular traffic and pedestrian traffic<br />
Although the PPM model and the MMLOS model defined buffers differently, it is clear<br />
that having separation between pedestrian and vehicular traffic improved the<br />
pedestrian LOS. Identifying where on‐street parking exists appears to be a promising<br />
way to measure this variable, as both models considered occupied on‐street parking a<br />
Issue Date: June 2011<br />
33