SACOG Conformity Determination

Sacramento Area
Council of
Governments
1415 L Street,
Suite 300
Sacramento, CA
95814
tel: 916.321.9000
fax: 916.321.9551
tdd: 916.321.9550
www.sacog.org
April 7, 2006
Mr. Gene K. Fong, Division Administrator
U.S. Federal Highway Administration
980 Ninth Street, Suite 400
Sacramento, CA 95814-2724
Mr. Leslie Rogers, Regional Administrator
Federal Transit Administration, Region IX
201 Mission St, Suite 2210
San Francisco, CA 94105
Ms. Lisa Hans, Chief
Mobile Sources Section
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
75 Hawthorne Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
Ms. Jody Jones, District Director
Caltrans District 03
P.O. Box 911
Marysville, CA 95901
Re: Transmittal of the Air Quality Conformity Determinations on the 2006
Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) and 2006/08 Metropolitan
Transportation Improvement Program (MTIP) for the Sacramento Ozone (ROG
and NOx) Nonattainment Area, Carbon Monoxide (CO) Maintenance Area, and
Particulate Matter (PM-10) Moderate Nonattainment Area.
Dear Messrs. Fong and Rogers and Mses. Hans and Jones:
The following air quality conformity determinations on the 2006 MTP
(Attachment A), and the 2006/08 MTIP (Attachment B) for the Sacramento
Ozone (ROG and NOx) Nonattainment Area, Carbon Monoxide (CO)
Maintenance Area, and Particulate Matter (PM-10) Moderate Nonattainment
Area are hereby transmitted to you for your review and approval. The SACOG
Board of Directors approved the attached conformity determinations at its
March 16, 2006, meeting.
The attached air quality conformity determinations have been prepared in
accordance with the conformity requirements as published in the federal register
on August 15, 1997, and in accordance with USDOT’s January 2, 2002,
guidance, Revised Guidance for Implementing the March 1999 Circuit Court
Decision Affecting Transportation Conformity (93.109).

Mr. Gene K. Fong, Mr. Leslie Rogers, Ms. Lisa Hans, and Ms. Jody Jones
Page 2
April 7, 2006
Conformity Approach
The last conformity determination for the Sacramento ozone nonattainment area, CO attainment
area and PM-10 moderate nonattainment area was adopted by the SACOG Board of Directors on
November 20, 2002 (93.114).
The conformity test for the Sacramento ozone nonattainment, CO attainment, and PM-10
moderate nonattainment area will consist of a quantitative emissions analysis (budget test for
ozone and CO and a build vs. no-build test for PM-10), as shown in Attachment C.
Plan and MTIP Status
The SACOG Board of Directors is scheduled to adopt the 2006 MTP and the 2006/08 MTIP at
its March 16, 2006, meeting (93.104).
Financial Constraint
The 2006 MTP and the 2006/08 MTIP are fiscally constrained consistent with 23 CFR 450
(93.108).
Inclusion of All Federal and Non-Federal Regionally Significant Projects
The 2006 MTP for 2025 and the 2006/08 MTIP include all federal and non-federal regionally
significant projects expected to occur in the Sacramento nonattainment (ozone), maintenance
(CO) and moderate (PM-10) areas, along with projects expected to be built in the Yuba/Sutter
attainment area [93.122(a)(1)].
Latest Planning Assumptions
The emission estimates developed for this conformity determination were based on the latest
population and employment projections for the Sacramento and Yuba/Sutter areas that were
adopted by the SACOG Board of Directors on December 16, 2004 (93.110).
Latest Emissions Model
One of the critical inputs into determining emissions associated with the 2006 MTP and the
2006/08 MTIP is the selection of which emissions factors to use. For purposes of this
conformity determination, EMFAC 2002 was used, as provided to SACOG by the California Air
Resources Board (CARB) along with revised emission factors dated January 24, 2002, which
were also provided to SACOG by CARB (93.111). Quantitative emissions analyses have been
prepared for the Sacramento nonattainment, maintenance, and moderate areas, as shown in
Attachment C.

Mr. Gene K. Fong, Mr. Leslie Rogers, Ms. Lisa Hans, and Ms. Jody Jones
Page 3
April 7, 2006
Modeling Documentation
A complete description of the Sacramento SACMET model that was used by SACOG to develop
the quantitative emissions analyses included with this submittal is available upon request
(93.111).
Estimates of regional transportation-related emissions for serious, severe, or extreme ozone
nonattainment areas that are used to support conformity determinations must be made in
accordance with the procedures laid out under section 93.122 (b) (1) through (3) of the August
15, 1997 Federal Register. The Sacramento ozone nonattainment area is currently classified as a
moderate ozone nonattainment area. SACOG’s SACMET Travel Demand model, which was
used to develop transportation-related emissions for the Sacramento nonattainment areas,
currently meets all the modeling requirements, as set forth in the August 15, 1997, Federal
Register. The SACMET model was used to develop ROG, NOx and CO emissions for the
Sacramento ozone nonattainment and carbon monoxide maintenance areas, respectively. The
EPA’s AP-42 emissions model was used to develop PM-10 emissions for the PM-10
nonattainment area (Sacramento County only).
Consultation
Review of this document is part of the conformity consultation process as required under section
93.105 (a) (2), 93.105 (c) (1), and 93.105 (e) and is consistent with the public involvement
procedures under 23 CFR 450 (93.112). This air quality conformity analysis was circulated for
thirty days to give all affected parties an opportunity to comment. Copies of all comments, along
with our responses, are included in Attachment D.
Over the last year, the Regional Planning Partnership (Partnership), a committee established by
the SACOG Board of Directors to review all conformity determinations and assumptions, was
asked to review and approve a set of assumptions for use in future conformity determinations.
Those assumptions have been incorporated into these conformity determinations.
Transportation Control Measures
SACOG has prepared status reports on the implementation of transportation control measures
(TCMs) contained in SACOG’s 1982 Air Quality Plan (AQP) and 15% Rate-Of-Progress (ROP)
Plan. These status reports were last submitted with SACOG’s April 28, 1994, conformity
submittal that was approved by Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Federal
Transit Administration (FTA) on August 16, 1994. The information contained in those
documents has not changed since that submittal. Therefore, copies of those documents will not
be transmitted with this submittal.
In summary, the 1987 report written by the EPA concluded "that, in general, most of the
agencies that committed to carrying out measures under the 1982 Air Quality Plan (AQP) have
fulfilled those commitments and, in many cases, have taken actions which go beyond their 1982
Plan commitments." The EPA did, however, point out that not all measures had been fully
implemented by 1987. Since 1987, jurisdictions included in the 1982 AQP have fully

Mr. Gene K. Fong, Mr. Leslie Rogers, Ms. Lisa Hans, and Ms. Jody Jones
Page 4
April 7, 2006
implemented all of their plan commitments, and in many cases, jurisdictions have gone beyond
their plan commitments, either through strengthening of existing measures or adoption of new
measures, as documented in the TCM status report.
Air Quality Emissions Analysis
In order for SACOG to make conformity determinations on the 2006 MTP and the 2006/08
MTIP, a quantitative emissions analysis must be performed for the Sacramento air quality
planning areas. SACOG has completed a quantitative emissions analysis for Reactive Organic
Gases (ROG) and Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) for the Sacramento ozone nonattainment areas, CO
maintenance area and PM-10 moderate area, as shown in Attachment C.
Years of Analysis - SACOG prepares estimates of emissions for the Sacramento air quality
planning areas for the analysis years described below. Estimates of emissions are prepared in
accordance with the conformity regulations as published in the August 15, 1997 Federal
Register.
The analysis years of 2008, 2010, 2013, 2018, 2020, and 2027 were chosen for the Sacramento
air quality planning areas because 2008 represents an ozone budget year under the Rate-Of-
Progress State Implementation Plan (ROP/SIP) and the first analysis year for PM10; 2010
represents one of the two milestone years for CO and is the first ozone milestone year and is also
no more than 10 years from the calibration year of the transportation model (2000 is the
calibration year for SACOG’s current transportation model – 93.122(b)(1)(i); 2013 is the current
attainment date for ozone; and 2018 is a milestone year for CO and PM10. The year 2020 was
chosen because it represents an horizon year as specified under section 93.106 (a)(1). The year
2027 is used because it represents the last year of the transportation plan’s forecast period and,
therefore, is required to be an emission analysis year, as specified under section 93.106 (a)(iv) of
the conformity regulation.
Analysis Techniques - The analysis techniques that were used for generating Reactive Organic
Gases (ROG), Nitrogen Oxides (NOx), and Carbon Monoxide (CO) emissions for this
conformity submittal are documented in Attachment C. Specifically, SACOG employed its
"SACMET" travel demand model for the Sacramento ozone nonattainment area to generate trips
and daily vehicle miles traveled (VMT) for each alternative scenario. The outputs from the
SACMET model were then inputted into a PC-based version of the Direct Travel Impact Model
(DTIM), which is used to generate emissions. One of the critical inputs into the DTIM is the
selection of emission factors. For this analysis, SACOG used EMFAC2002, as provided to us by
the CARB.
PM-10 Analysis - In addition to the above pollutants analyzed, SACOG also performed a PM-10
analysis for the Sacramento PM-10 nonattainment area. The methodology employed (AP-42)
was provided to SACOG by the EPA. Emission projections of PM-10 were made for the years
2008, 2018, and 2027, as shown in Attachment C.

Mr. Gene K. Fong, Mr. Leslie Rogers, Ms. Lisa Hans, and Ms. Jody Jones
Page 5
April 7, 2006
Transit Policies and Ridership
Prior to any transportation conformity modeling, SACOG incorporates any changes to fares or
levels of service to the transit operating systems within the Sacramento and Yuba/Sutter planning
areas for conformity [93.110 (c)]. There have been no significant changes to the fares or levels
of service since the last conformity submittal. The last conformity determinations for the
Sacramento ozone nonattainment area, CO attainment area, PM-10 moderate, and Yuba/Sutter
ozone nonattainment areas were adopted by the SACOG Board of Directors on June 20, 2002
(93.114).
On September 1, 2005, the Sacramento Regional Transit Board of Directors approved a phased
fare increase effective September 1, 2005, along with some minor reductions in bus service. The
first phase of the new fare included an increase in the basic fare from $1.50 to $1.75, plus a new
$.25 transfer charge, an increase in the monthly pass from $60 to $80, and an ADA/Paratransit
fare increase from $3.00 to $3.25. It is not known at this time whether or not the fare increase
will adversely affect ridership.
Transit ridership within the SACOG conformity areas has increased slightly from approximately
36.99 million in FY 2003-04 to approximately 37.54 million in FY 2004-05. This represents an
increase in ridership of approximately 1.2%. The following chart shows the changes in ridership
from FY 2003-04 to FY 2004-05 for the major transit systems within the SACOG conformity
planning areas.
03/04 04/05
Major Transit Operators within the Actual Actual
Sacramento Air Quality Planning Areas Ridership Ridership
Regional Transit Light Rail 11,022,004 12,008,620
Regional Transit Bus System 19,446,782 18,929,374
Yolobus 1,215,615 1,245,120
Roseville Transit 391,502 390,190
Paratransit 650,616 723,345
Unitrans 3,450,060 3,416,432
Folsom 161,552 157,973
Yuba/Sutter
Yuba/Sutter Transit Authority 652,529 675,324
Total Ridership 36,990,660 37,545,648
The MTP for 2025 includes a number of goals supporting transit, and they are listed below:
Develop a fully-integrated, multi-modal transportation system to serve as a catalyst to
enhance the quality of life enjoyed by the current and future residents of the Sacramento
region.

Mr. Gene K. Fong, Mr. Leslie Rogers, Ms. Lisa Hans, and Ms. Jody Jones
Page 6
April 7, 2006
Improve access to goods, jobs, services, housing, and other destinations; provide mobility
for people and goods throughout the region, in a safe, affordable, efficient and convenient
manner.
Develop a transportation system and related strategies that contribute to achieving
healthy air in the region.
Provide affordable, convenient, safe, and integrated travel choices.
Pursue a transportation system that addresses the needs of all people in all parts of the
region and assure that impacts of transportation projects don’t adversely affect particular
communities disproportionately.
Develop the transportation system to promote and enhance environmental quality for
present and future generations.
Influence land use policies to improve access to jobs, services, and housing to everyone
in the region by using market forces and the regulatory process.
Public Participation Process
SACOG’s Community Input Plan outlines the techniques employed by SACOG to help facilitate
public participation during the development of the 2006 MTP, and solicitation of projects for the
2006/08 MTIP. SACOG's Community Input Plan provides for early and continuing participation
in our long-range transportation plans, our project-selection or "programming" process (i.e.,
Federal TIP), and the air-quality "conformity" determination and environmental reviews
associated with these plans and programs.
These conformity determinations were circulated to the public and interested federal, state, and
local agencies and jurisdictions for their review, consultation, and comment for a minimum of
thirty days. Copies of all comments received, along with our responses, are included as
Attachment D.
Resolutions of Adoption for the 2006 MTP and the 2006/08 MTIP
Copies of the resolutions of adoption finding that the 2006 MTP and the 2006/08 MTIP conform
to the 2005 ROP/SIP are included as Attachments E and F, respectively, for your review and
approval. The SACOG Board approved the attached resolutions at its March 16, 2006, meeting.
In summation, we hope that the information provided in this letter, plus the supporting
documentation, will assist in your approval of SACOG's air quality conformity determinations
on the 2006 MTP and the 2006/08 MTIP for the Sacramento air quality planning areas.

Mr. Gene K. Fong, Mr. Leslie Rogers, Ms. Lisa Hans, and Ms. Jody Jones
Page 7
April 7, 2006
If you have any questions concerning this conformity submittal, please call David Young, Senior
Planner, at (916) 340-6232.
Sincerely,
Mike McKeever
Executive Director
MM:DHY:gg
Attachments
cc:
Jerome Wiggins, Federal Transit Administration
Sue Kiser, Federal Highway Administration
Karina O’Connor, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Larry Sherwood, Caltrans District 3
Scott McGowan, Caltrans Division of Transportation Programming
Steve Luxenberg, Federal Highway Administration
S:\Projects 05-06\0401-AQ Conf\AQ Submittal to Feds\AQ Conformity - Cover Letter.doc

SACOG-06-009
2006 Metropolitan
Transportation Plan
for the SACOG Region Including
the counties of Sacramento, Yolo, Yuba,
Sutter, El Dorado and Placer
Adopted March 16, 2006
Sacramento Area
Council of
Governments
1415 L Street
Suite 300
Sacramento, CA
95814
tel: 916.321.9000
fax: 916.321.9551
www.sacog.org

CONTENTS
1. A Long-Range Transportation Plan for the Region.......................................................1
2. Development of Metropolitan Transportation Plans......................................................8
3. Growth and Change .....................................................................................................11
4. Meeting the Plan’s Goals.............................................................................................16
5. Comparing Alternative Transportation Futures...........................................................27
6. The Contents of the 2006 MTP....................................................................................36
7. Paying for the 2006 MTP.............................................................................................45
8. Implementing the 2006 MTP.......................................................................................51
APPENDICES
A. Public Outreach............................................................................................................57
B. The Community Design Funding Program..................................................................59
C. Intelligent Transportation System Strategies...............................................................75
D. Demographic/Land Use, Modeling, and Financial Assumptions ................................77
E. Listing of Projects and Programs.................................................................................83
F. Inter-Regional Passenger Transportation...................................................................108
G. Freight Transportation ...............................................................................................110
H. SACOG Regional Aviation System Plan...................................................................115
I. SACOG Congestion Management System ................................................................123
J. Transportation Models and Technical Analysis ........................................................127
K. References..................................................................................................................130
L. IRR TIP Project..........................................................................................................132
M. SACOG Board of Directors Resolution of Support ...................................................135
N. Key Excerpts from the 2006 MTP Air Quality Conformity Determination..............137
O. Environmental Justice Analysis from the MTP 2025 ............................................... 149
TABLES
1. Regional Growth 2005-2027........................................................................................12
2. Fastest-Growing Communities 2005-2027..................................................................13
3. Comparative Growth, 1975-2000 ................................................................................14
4. Metropolitan Transportation Plan Goals......................................................................17
5. Key Performance Indicators for the 2006 MTP...........................................................29
6. Plan Summary..............................................................................................................38
7. Connector Projects.......................................................................................................39
8. Revenue Estimates – Summary by Year, 2005-2027 ..................................................48
9. Summary of Funding & Expenditures, 2005-2027......................................................49
MAPS (at end of document)
1. Sacramento Area
2. Federal Air Quality Planning Boundaries
3. Traffic Congestion in 2005
4. Traffic Congestion in 2025 with 2006 MTP Projects
5. Major Projects, 2006 MTP

1. A LONG-RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR THE REGION
This plan is called the 2006 Metropolitan Transportation Plan for the SACOG Region Including
the Counties of Sacramento, Yolo, Yuba, Sutter, El Dorado, and Placer (also referred to as the
2006 MTP) covering the federal fiscal years 2006 through 2027. Map 1 shows the extent of
this region 1 . The 2006 MTP restores air-quality non-exempt projects 2 to the plan that have
not been possible to include since October 2004 due to SACOG’s inability to make air-quality
conformity findings.
In 2002, SACOG adopted the Metropolitan Transportation Plan for 2025 (MTP 2025), an MTP
update that involved three years of public involvement, a new set of goals and guiding principles,
and major initiatives including new regional funding programs, connector projects, and expansion
of public transit. The MTP 2025 was to be updated three years later in July 2005, according to
federal law. However, in October 2004 SACOG lost its ability to demonstrate conformity to the
1994 State Implementation Plan (SIP) for the Sacramento Air Basin, causing an “air quality
conformity lapse” to occur for that part of the region. The lapse was caused because the 1994 State
Implementation Plan (SIP) – a plan based on older modeling and planning assumptions – did not
use the latest planning assumptions and the latest emissions model, as required by federal
transportation conformity regulations. As a result, no new air quality conformity determinations
could be made until a new SIP, including a new motor vehicle emissions budget, was approved by
the Environmental Protection Agency. For the Yuba-Sutter Air Basin, there was no air-quality
conformity lapse and the MTP 2025 remained in effect until July 2005. 3
In October 2004, SACOG approved the Interim Metropolitan Transportation Plan 2004/05
(Interim MTP) that covered only the Sacramento Air Basin. This plan contained only air-quality
exempt projects, such as bicycle and pedestrian projects. The Interim MTP was intended to be a
plan with a short life, effective only until a new Rate-of-Progress SIP (ROP SIP) and a new MTP
that restored the air-quality non-exempt projects originally shown in the MTP 2025 could be
developed. As a consequence, the Interim MTP contained only 3 years of projects, reserving the
balance of funding through 2027 as uncommitted funds.
1 This plan incorporates the regional transportation plans developed by the Placer County Transportation Planning
Agency and the El Dorado County Transportation Commission. SACOG holds Memoranda of Understanding with
these Regional Transportation Planning Agencies that meets federal requirements for coordination of transportation
planning and funding.
2 “Air-quality non-exempt” is a term used in federal law meaning transportation projects that normally result in
additional emissions that are subject to federal rules.
3 The Sacramento air basin is technically referred to as the Federal Sacramento Ozone Nonattainment Area, and
includes Sacramento County, the southern third of Sutter County, Yolo County, El Dorado County, and Placer County,
but excludes the Tahoe Basin. A piece of Solano County is also included in this air basin, but SACOG holds and
agreement with the Metropolitan Transportation Commission giving transportation planning responsibilities to that
agency. The Yuba/Sutter air basin was formerly referred to as the Federal Yuba/Sutter Ozone Nonattainment Area and
includes Yuba County and the northern two-thirds of Sutter County. Under the new 8-hour standard, the Yuba/Sutter
area is now in attainment and excludes the Sutter Buttes. See Map 2 for the boundaries of these federal air quality
nonattainment areas.
1

In July 2005, SACOG approved another interim plan, called the Metropolitan Transportation Plan
2027 (MTP 2027) that unified all six counties in one plan. For the Sacramento Air Basin, the MTP
2027 simply incorporated the Interim MTP. Because the Yuba-Sutter Air Basin area had been
covered by the MTP 2025, which was expiring in July 2005, the MTP 2027 update was needed so
that projects could continue to be implemented. Again, this plan was developed to enable the
region to continue to build and operate projects in the period during which a new ROP SIP was
being developed, as well as an MTP usable as a base from which to restore the original vision of
the MTP 2025.
This 2006 MTP, which restores the MTP 2025 while extending the horizon year to 2027 and
adding a few projects, has been developed by SACOG concurrently with the ROP SIP for the
Sacramento Air Basin that has been developed by the local air districts. This SIP is expected to be
approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency by April 2006, as is the 2006 MTP that
relies upon it for air quality conformity determinations.
Two excerpts from related documents have been appended to this MTP for informational purposes.
First, Appendix N includes excerpts from the Air Quality Conformity Determination on the 2006
MTP and the 2006/08 Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program (MTIP) for the
Sacramento Ozone (ROG and NOx) Nonattainment Area, Carbon Monoxide (CO) Maintenance
Area, and Particulate Matter (PM-10) Moderate Nonattainment Area. Second, because this plan
restores the MTP 2025, Appendix O includes the analysis of environmental justice issues from the
Environmental Impact Report for the MTP 2025.
WHAT ABOUT FUTURE MTPs?
Looking forward to 2007, SACOG will be using the SACOG Board-adopted 2050 Blueprint
Preferred Land-Use Alternative to develop a 2030 land use base for a next-generation MTP. The
Blueprint project, which has been a major initiative at SACOG over the past several years, has
educated the public and encouraged local jurisdictions commitment to the use of smart growth
principles in their General Plans. This MTP will also incorporate a new 8-hour SIP for the
Sacramento air basin and a new integrated transportation-land use travel demand model.
WHAT WILL THE FUTURE BRING TO THE SACRAMENTO REGION?
The six-county Sacramento region has changed dramatically in many ways since 1975, and
can expect equally dramatic changes looking forward to 2027. Back in the mid-1970s, the
region's population had reached about 1.1 million. The only major job center was found in
downtown Sacramento. The regional transportation system, focused on radial access between
suburbs and downtown Sacramento, consisted of freeways designed in the 1960s with twenty years
of spare capacity. By the mid-1970s, the region’s decision-makers had decided not to expand the
freeway system further, and instead built two new radial light rail lines, completed by the mid-
1980s. Surrounding communities of that time -- Elk Grove, Davis, Woodland, Yuba City,
Marysville, Roseville, and Folsom -- enjoyed easy access to and from Sacramento, even on twolane
roads. Daily traffic congestion was essentially non-existent.
2

Today, the region has evolved in ways unforeseen even ten years ago. The population, 2.1
million in 2005, has spread out to bring Elk Grove, Roseville, Rocklin, and Folsom into the urban
area. Rancho Cordova has emerged as a second major job center rivaling downtown Sacramento,
and Roseville is not far behind. Two-worker households have become the norm, with extensive
commuting from one community to another. Low-density suburban patterns mean people travel
overwhelmingly by automobile: 47 percent of trips drive alone, 46 percent of trips go by auto with
two or more occupants, 6 percent are bicycle or walk trips, and 1 percent of trips are by transit
(with transit use reaching 3 percent into downtown Sacramento during commute hours).
The radial transportation system no longer serves the region's needs well. The U.S. 50 freeway
serves as the region's core corridor, carrying a full load of traffic in both directions both morning
and afternoon, and increasingly at midday as well. Intermittent congestion is now widespread, since
the spare capacity once built into the system has been consumed by growth, with little new capacity
added since 1980.
Looking forward to 2027, the State forecasts the region's population to reach 2.9 million, a 37
percent increase. With that comes a 53 percent increase in travel -- unless land development
proceeds differently than it has in the past. The region by 2027 will have three major job centers:
downtown Sacramento/West Sacramento, Rancho Cordova/Folsom, and Roseville/Rocklin. The
urban edge will expand to encompass El Dorado Hills and Lincoln, as well as areas east and west
of Elk Grove, south of Rancho Cordova, west of Roseville, Southport in West Sacramento, North
Natomas, and perhaps South Sutter County. Present trends and zoning indicate that residential areas
and office/industrial areas will continue to develop separately. More than a million people will live
on each side of the American River.
Looking to this future, the region needs a new transportation vision and plan. Many
expectations during the past 25 years have not worked out. Sprawl around the edges continues
to out-pace infill into existing communities, and businesses increasingly prefer suburban locations.
Even though gasoline prices are at an all-time high, the total amount of driving has more than
doubled since 1980. Even so, total smog emissions from motor vehicles are now half what they
were in 1980, because technology has reduced auto emissions by 98 percent from 1980 models.
Lack of road building and the resulting congestion have not encouraged many people to take transit
instead of driving, even at the extreme congestion levels seen in big cities like Los Angeles.
Instead, drivers move onto neighborhood streets, seeking to avoid heavy traffic. A 1999
Sacramento Regional Transit survey showed that half of those who commute on transit, and threequarters
of those who ride transit for other reasons, do not have access to an auto. Furthermore,
those percentages rose through the 1990s, so transit increasingly serves those who cannot otherwise
choose to drive, despite a focus on luring drivers out of their autos. Shipping of goods by truck has
ballooned, instead of shifting to railroads, with trucks serving as rolling warehouses feeding just-intime
manufacturing, and stores with computerized inventories.
Sacramento needs a realistic and creative new plan to manage recent trends heading into the
future. The region does not want continuing suburban sprawl for a million new residents. Greater
congestion, more compact development, an aging population, clean air goals, and energy
conservation all point to a need to improve and expand transit service. The Sacramento region, with
ideal climate and terrain, could see more travel by bicycling and walking, now discouraged in some
3

communities by heavy local auto traffic. With more than a million empty seats in autos, but fewer
than 10,000 empty seats in buses every morning and afternoon, carpools clearly have a place in the
picture. Regardless, a 53 percent increase in travel by 2027 means that, even if transit use could be
increased tenfold and bicycle/walk trips tripled, the region still would face a 40 percent increase in
travel by auto. At least in some places the road system must be expanded too.
WHAT WAS NEW ABOUT THE MTP 2025?
The 2006 MTP continues the direction of the MTP 2025, pursuing ten broad goals, only three
of which deal directly with transportation, with the primary goal being to improve quality of
life. Chapter Four discusses these ten goals in more detail. "Quality of life" may mean somewhat
different things to different people, but it generally encompasses quiet and safe neighborhoods,
affordable housing, job opportunities, good schools, limited environmental pollution, opportunities
for recreational and activities, and adequate transportation to allow access to places where these
activities occur.
The 2006 MTP will use transportation funds for community design, to encourage people to
walk, bicycle, or ride transit for local travel. Steps to reduce auto travel, by changing the way
people travel or the places to which they go, will become imperative during the few decades. The
predominance of low-density suburban development with jobs and shopping separated from
residential areas cannot continue indefinitely. However, the existing suburban communities of
today won't look much different by 2027, because around two-thirds of the region's housing in
2027 is already in place, and those houses can be expected to last 50 years or longer. The 2006
MTP supports changes in development patterns, through the on-going community design incentive
program, both for new communities and redevelopment of older ones. At best the results can be
expected to evolve slowly over time.
The 2006 MTP gives first priority to expanding the transit system, more than doubling light
rail mileage and the bus fleet, primarily in the Sacramento area. This plan supports current
transportation operations but does not allow for any major expansion of the system. Money to
pay for operations (drivers, mechanics, parts, fuel), however, limits the amount of transit service
the region can offer. Fares pay only 30 percent of operating costs, with the other 70 percent coming
from taxpayers. For the middle-class household, the 15 percent of income consumed for
transportation typically reflects a personal choice for automobile travel, often including two or
more vehicles. For those who are less affluent, the cost for auto transportation rises to 20-25
percent of income, imposing a hardship for which a good transit choice would often be a relief. In
addition, those who cannot drive or need another travel choice present different challenges for the
transportation system and for transit service. The State forecasts the share of the population older
than 75 years of age, with a lower propensity to drive, to increase by 30 percent. The 2006 MTP
will allow little progress in expanding the transit system for these upcoming demands.
The 2006 MTP also commits regional funds to bicycle and pedestrian projects. Except for
recreational walking, circulation in downtown areas, and neighborhood social visiting, walking
currently plays a limited role in the transportation system. Only about 3 percent of commute trips
4

are made by bicycle, but 15 percent of commuters travel no further than three miles to work. Few
suburban children bicycle or walk today; instead, their parents drive them around by auto. Unless
community design changes take hold, the share of trips made by bicycling and walking is not
predicted to change significantly.
Beyond transit, walking, and bicycling, the region faces a 40 to 50 percent increase in auto
travel. Obviously it makes a difference whether those people will drive alone or ride in
carpools, and where on the system they travel. The 2006 MTP includes funding for
transportation demand management (TDM), including a rideshare program. The regional
rideshare program is included in the current SIP as a Transportation Control Measure (TCM), and
will remain a TCM in perpetuity as a SIP requirement. Like nearly all urban areas around the
country, Sacramento is seeing a gradual shift from commuting by carpool and transit to driving
alone. This trend reflects the separation of housing from jobs, the huge increase in two-worker
households, and the predominantly suburban lifestyle with lots of widely separated activities and an
increasing need for one or more errand stops on the way to or from work. TDM programs offer
people information and incentives for alternatives to driving whenever this is feasible.
Congestion generally will continue to worsen inside the urban area, because the system has
little remaining spare road capacity and the region foresees neither the funding nor the
community desire to increase road capacity by 40 percent or more. The 2006 MTP proposes
some road improvements, to hold off some of the increase in congestion. While the region
cannot reasonably be expected to build its way out of congestion, the investments listed in the 2006
MTP will make a difference, lessening congestion in some corridors, depending on where the
region invests in more transit and road capacity or land use changes.
The 2006 MTP foresees $27.5 billion to work with, on average almost $1.2 billion per year for
22 years, with $4.9 billion of that as federal funds coming to the region for regional-scale
improvements. The federal funds have come to the region in past years, but the region before
2002 passed them to counties and cities for local projects. Of the $27.5 billion, the 2006 MTP
shows that about a quarter goes to operate transit services - not enough to provide the level of
transit service needed in a region of 2.9 million. Another quarter goes to maintain streets, roads,
and highways - again, not enough to provide adequate maintenance especially in more rural areas
of the region. Essentially, the remaining half must be used for improvements:
• First $2.8 billion goes to transit improvements, including light rail extensions, a 150 percent
increase in bus service in urban Sacramento, and increases in bus service in the other
counties.
• Second, $3.2 billion goes to state highway improvements, mainly to complete four-lane
highways to connect the northern counties with the rest of the region and add carpool lanes
to urban freeways.
• Third, $6 billion goes to local street and road improvements, such as intersection
improvements, safety projects, signal timing, widening in growth areas, and new
connections for local access.
5

• Finally, this plan proposes to use $1.7 billion for other types of improvements important to
achieving regional goals: bicycle and pedestrian improvements, community design
incentives, travel demand management (including the regional rideshare program), clean
air, open space, and enhancement programs.
Analysis shows that even with $4.9 billion of federal funding available, the region can’t by
itself fund all regional-scale improvements needed and envisioned in the 2006 MTP.
Regional-scale improvements put off to the future in the past 20 years are coming home to roost.
The 2006 MTP anticipates supplemental funding -- from federal grants for light rail extensions, and
from state interregional funds for state highway improvements, particularly in the region's five
smaller counties, and local funding, from Sacramento's sales tax or development fees or other local
sources -- to help complete some of the state highway and arterial improvements in urban
Sacramento, where total cost exceeds regional funds. Locally, counties and cities also lack enough
funding for street and road improvements to deal with growing local traffic.
The 2006 MTP brings forth a regional view, a different perception of the region and its role
from the plans of the 90’s. This view is not wholly new: most of the ideas were envisioned in
SACOG's 1989 Metro Study, but few were implemented, partly because the system functioned
adequately back then, and the easy choice was to avoid controversial projects and issues. Like the
Metro Study, the MTP 2025 (the basis for this 2006 MTP) looked at the transportation system from
the point of view of the traveler needing to use the whole system, not just each jurisdiction
managing its piece of the system. It recognized that, if the region is to provide transportation for
one million more people and control urban sprawl, transportation improvements inevitably must go
by someone's front door or back yard. It proposed some locally controversial projects, and opened
other issues where no regional consensus is yet possible. In this way, the MTP 2025 started in new
directions, and this 2006 MTP continues with that vision. The MTP 2025 also put forth the
challenge of implementation, to engage local and regional debate to reach agreement on how
transportation is to be fitted into communities and neighborhoods.
WHAT ISSUES CAN’T THIS PLAN RESOLVE?
Discussion during the development of the MTP 2025 spotlighted a number of tough issues
fundamental for transportation, that still remain:
• How does the region want to handle one million new people by 2025: with continuing
development around the urban edge or with infill development in existing communities at
higher than prevailing densities?
• Do communities want jobs/housing balance, including housing affordable to all
workers, to provide a better opportunity to live, work, and travel locally other than by auto,
or continued separation of residential and office/industrial development, which implies
continued community-to-community travel?
• Should transit's primary role be to serve those who cannot drive or for whom driving
is a hardship, or should it provide another choice to those for whom driving is now the
6

easiest and best option? How is the 70 percent share of transit's operating costs now coming
from public funds to be provided?
• Is encouraging people to use transit or carpools instead of driving alone important
enough to warrant increasing the cost of driving, via road tolls, gasoline tax surcharges,
or parking fees, and using the money to increase available transit service dramatically?
• Should main-road capacity in major travel corridors be increased to prevent the
increasingly common and much-disparaged practice of drivers cutting through
neighborhood streets to avoid traffic jams?
• To what extent should the region try to satisfy region-wide travel demand -- by
building onto the system to reduce congestion, so that the opportunity to live where you
want to, work anywhere in the region, and do business region wide is preserved?
• How should the region balance protection of the American River Parkway as a
recreational and open space asset against the growing need for greater transportation access
across the river?
On these issues SACOG could find no consensus. The MTP 2025 aimed to engage debate on these
larger issues, and the 2006 MTP, by its nature a plan that bridges the gap until the region prepares a
“next generation” MTP in 2007, is not able to resolve them. We expect that this MTP 2030, to be
completed in 2007, will make progress in finding answers and thus become more effective in using
the region’s limited resources.
7

2. DEVELOPMENT OF METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLANS
WHY DOES SACOG PREPARE A METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN?
Under federal law, SACOG is responsible for long-range transportation planning in a sixcounty
area -- Sacramento, Yolo, Yuba, Sutter, El Dorado and Placer Counties (excluding the
Tahoe Basin). 4 Most of this planning area is designated a "federal non-attainment area for ozone,"
meaning that for the region to be eligible to receive federal transportation funds, the region's
transportation system must meet particular air quality standards.
Transportation systems are best planned at a regional level because people don't confine their
trips to a local area. Federal law established regional agencies for the purpose of area-wide
transportation planning in the 1970s, so that planning for highways, roads, and public transit would
be comprehensive and cooperative between local agencies.
For this region, a long-range regional transportation plan is required to cover at least a 20-year
planning horizon, and it must be updated every four years. This plan covers 22 years, federal fiscal
years 2006 through 2027.
The MTP provides the regional vision for surface transportation, within the constraints of funding
that the region can reasonably expect to receive. If a city, county, or public agency in the region
wants to use of federal or state transportation funding for projects or programs, the projects must be
contained in, or be consistent with, this MTP.
HOW WAS THE 2006 MTP CREATED AND WHO WAS INVOLVED?
In late 1999, SACOG embarked on a major effort to revisit and rethink its Metropolitan
Transportation Plan, using an unprecedented amount of public outreach and a citizen advisory
group called the Transportation Roundtable. The result was the MTP 2025, adopted in July 2002.
This 2006 MTP restores the full vision of the MTP 2025, after a period of interim plans that
were made necessary when the State Implementation Plan for Air Quality, to which MTPs must
conform for air quality, became out-of-date.
The list of projects in this 2006 MTP was agreed to by SACOG’s agency partners who serve on the
Regional Planning Partnership and by the Board of Directors when the MTP 2025 was adopted in
2002. A small number of new projects has been added to this original MTP 2025 project list. The
Draft 2006 MTP was circulated for a 30-day public review according to the Community Input Plan,
along with an Addendum to the Environmental Impact Report for the MTP for 2025 (see Appendix
A for the Community Input Plan). The Community Input Plan includes a public hearing, website
and other methods of outreach to the public and stakeholders.
4 SACOG is designated as a Metropolitan Planning Organization (or MPO) under federal law, encompassing the six
counties.
8

The SACOG Board of Directors, in its policy role overseeing long-range transportation planning
in the region, is ultimately responsible for adopting MTPs. In the development of the MTP 2025,
the Board was advised on the goals (shown in Table 4) and policies of the plan by the
Transportation Roundtable, a group composed of 55 stakeholders from around the region. The
Roundtable’s key recommendation was to use as much as one-third of regional transportation funds
to pursue community and environmental objectives, including community design projects to
support smart growth, clean air, bicycle/pedestrian, and demand management programs. The
Roundtable also recommended giving priority to public transit and expanding light rail, seeking to
improve accessibility in congested locations or corridors, aiming transit service toward commuters
and low-income, elderly, young, and disabled persons, providing alternative travel choices to
driving, and using new technologies. Extensive public outreach provided ideas and feedback on the
MTP 2025. Valley Vision, a regional organization of leaders primarily from the private sector,
provided financial support for regional forums and made the MTP a top priority of its members.
SACOG's technical committees and individual cities and counties made specific
recommendations considered by the Board of Directors. SACOG staff provided the technical
analysis for the MTP 2025, planned the Roundtable meetings with professional facilitators, met
with other agencies, interest groups, and the public, and in the end drafted the MTP 2025. The staff
also provided financial forecasts of amounts and types of funds expected to be available between
2002 and 2025 and information from the regional transportation model and other data sources.
Finally, the MTP 2025 took into account the plans of other agencies and corridor investment
strategies.
WHAT FEDERAL AND STATE REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET?
Federal statutes require adherence to eight planning objectives in the development of regional
transportation plans 5 :
• support economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global
competitiveness, productivity, and efficiency;
• increase safety of the transportation system for motorized and nonmotorized users;
• increase the security of the transportation system for motorized and nonmotorized users;
• increase the accessibility and mobility options of people and for freight;
• protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life,
and promote consistency between transportation improvements and State and local planned
growth and economic development patterns;
• enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between
modes, for people and freight;
• promote efficient system management and operation; and
• emphasize preservation of the existing transportation system
All of these federal objectives coincide with the adopted goals in the MTP 2025 that are carried
forward into this 2006 MTP, and were considered in defining the strategies and projects in the plan.
The elements of the federally-required congestion management system in SACOG's planning and
programming processes is included in Appendix H.
5 From the Safe Accountable Flexible Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU),
August 2005.
9

The 2006 MTP is consistent with the California Transportation Plan, a statewide document
with policies that should be followed in all regional transportation plans.
The 2006 MTP includes access to interregional passenger and freight transportation, such as
Amtrak stations, freight railyards, airports, and the Port of Sacramento, but does not include
planning for those systems, which are owned and operated by other entities. A discussion of
interregional passenger and freight transportation is found in Appendices F and G. Appendix H
provides detail on the Regional Aviation System.
The 2006 MTP is a plan intended to continue the vision of the MTP 2025 and provide a
bridge to the “next generation” update of the MTP to be adopted by July 2007 (the MTP
2030). It enables federal decisions and federal funding for near-term projects, keeping them
on track during the period between March 2006 and mid-2007.
10

3. GROWTH AND CHANGE
HOW MUCH GROWTH CAN THE SACRAMENTO REGION EXPECT?
Growth continues to be the big story in the region. A recent Central Valley Survey, conducted
by the Public Policy Institute of California and the Great Valley Center, found that 43 percent of
those surveyed in the Sacramento Region rated growth and development as a big problem, and
56 percent rated traffic congestion as a big problem. Mark Baldassare, Survey Director of the
Public Policy Institute, called the results "stunning," saying that "It's the pace of change and also
the type of change that's occurring in the outlying regions of Sacramento right now. The changes
are very noticeable and troubling to people." 6
The Sacramento region's economy is healthy and yet changing in fundamental ways. With the
nearby Bay Area running out of land for development, the region has become attractive to coastal
residents, new immigrants, employers and developers because of its lower cost of housing and its
job opportunities. The number of jobs in electronics manufacturing, information services, health
care, agriculture, food processing and tourism -- industries that are important to the economic
transformation -- is rapidly approaching that provided by government, which has long been a
cornerstone of the region's economy. These new jobs are also replacing the military- related jobs
that have left the region due to military base closures. Within the next few years, these industries
will likely, for the first time, employ more of the region's residents than the public sector, and will
bring with them the potential for faster economic growth but also the potential for more volatility in
the local economy. 7
Population in the region is expected to grow by 788,000 people, an increase of about 37
percent, from 2.15 million in 2005 to 2.94 million in 2027. Table 1 shows population, housing,
and employment projections for the six counties of the region (excluding the Tahoe Basin). Table 2
highlights the areas (regional analysis districts, which are roughly equivalent to communities)
expected to experience the largest absolute growth in population, housing and employment in the
region between 2005 and 2027.
Despite encouragement of infill development, most new housing continues to be located in
areas beyond existing urban development. Ninety percent of new housing is expected to locate at
or beyond today's urban edge, on what are referred to as "greenfields." Booming areas for
population and housing growth include Rancho Cordova, El Dorado Hills, South Sacramento
County, North Natomas, West Sacramento, and in Roseville, Rocklin, and Lincoln.
Jobs are spreading out around the region. Forty percent of job growth between 2000 and
2025 comes in office and manufacturing jobs in suburban areas (Rancho Cordova, Roseville,
North Natomas, Folsom, Rocklin, Elk Grove, Galt, Woodland, Davis, and El Dorado Hills). Only
10 percent of total job growth is expected to locate in downtown Sacramento. In total, employment
in expected to grow by about 400,000, a 39 percent increase.
6 Sacramento Bee, “Growth tops list of worries in the Valley,” April 25, 2002.
7 Valley Vision, California State University Sacramento, and SACOG, Sacramento Region Quality-of-Life Index 2000.
January 2002.
11

TABLE 1. REGIONAL GROWTH, 2005-2027
Counties 2005 2027 Increase % Increase
2005-2027 2005-2027
POPULATION
El Dorado 147,045 203,227 56,182 38%
Placer 301,560 435,741 134,181 44%
Sacramento 1,361,637 1,762,523 400,886 29%
Sutter 87,342 142,626 55,284 63%
Yolo 187,942 280,091 92,148 49%
Yuba 65,952 114,801 48,849 74%
Six-County Total 2,151,479 2,939,009 787,531 37%
HOUSEHOLDS
El Dorado 56,111 82,672 26,561 47%
Placer 121,507 183,898 62,391 51%
Sacramento 502,142 722,406 220,263 44%
Sutter 29,373 56,324 26,950 92%
Yolo 66,239 112,276 46,037 70%
Yuba 21,533 45,392 23,859 111%
Six-County Total 796,905 1,202,967 406,062 51%
EMPLOYMENT
El Dorado 51,644 71,205 19,561 38%
Placer 156,237 238,067 81,829 52%
Sacramento 657,100 869,975 212,875 32%
Sutter 33,506 49,433 15,927 48%
Yolo 136,347 191,037 54,690 40%
Yuba 22,988 47,294 24,306 106%
Six-County Total 1,057,823 1,467,011 409,188 39%
Source: Sacramento Area Council of Governments, projections adopted by the Board of Directors 12-16-04.
Note: Placer and El Dorado County data exclude the Tahoe Basin.
12

TABLE 2. FASTEST-GROWING COMMUNITIES, 2005-2027
Communities 2005 2027 Increase % Increase
2005-2027 2005-2027
POPULATION
Cosumnes 6,496 59,474 52,978 816%
Rancho Cordova 117,182 169,093 51,911 44%
Laguna 67,277 116,509 49,232 73%
Vineyard 24,171 69,609 45,438 188%
West Sacramento 39,878 84,362 44,484 112%
HOUSEHOLDS
Rancho Cordova 42,568 67,871 25,303 59%
Laguna 22,378 46,658 24,280 108%
West Sacramento 14,453 35,688 21,234 147%
Cosumnes 2,193 22,684 20,491 934%
Yuba City 24,117 43,994 19,877 82%
EMPLOYMENT
West Sacramento 29,479 84,356 54,876 186%
Rancho Cordova 91,550 146,055 54,505 60%
Roseville 66,290 117,095 50,805 77%
Downtown Sacramento 113,421 159,479 46,058 41%
East Sacramento 58,148 80,767 22,619 39%
Source: Sacramento Area Council of Governments, projections adopted by the Board of Directors 12-16-04.
The distribution of growth is the most important issue for transportation. Travel patternsparticularly
during commute periods - have become more complex because so much of the
expected growth of both jobs and housing is located in suburban locations. Formerly uncongested
roads are becoming clogged, especially major arterials in suburban areas. Many suburban job sites
have little or no transit service, and transit service connecting suburban residential and employment
areas is especially thin. Increasingly, commuters must rely on autos.
WHY SHOULD SACRAMENTO EXPECT THIS MUCH GROWTH?
In preparing the MTP 2025 in 2002, several people told SACOG that the projection of a million
more people in Sacramento in 2025 would not be desirable. SACOG, however, cannot plan for the
population level people may want; SACOG must plan for population growth likely to occur. In
fact, it may be better to plan for growth on the high side than to fall short and have to catch up later.
Past history and population forecasts indicate that 800,000 in population growth by 2027 is
reasonable. SACOG in 1977 estimated that the region's population (then 1.12 million) would grow
13

to 1.76 million by 2000. In fact, the 2000 Census reported population of 1.89 million, so the 1977
estimate turned out to be a bit low. If Sacramento’s growth rate stays the same as it has been since
1977 all the way out to 2027, the population will reach 3.25 million, one-third more growth than
the MTP 2025 expected, which was 2.8 million.
A look at other cities that in 1977 were about the size Sacramento is now also indicates
800,000 population growth by 2027 to be reasonable, with the greatest risk that it is on the
low side (Table 3). Once population passes about 1 million in size, an urban economy becomes
self-sustaining, not dependent on the economies of other urban areas nearby. A comparison to ten
cities whose populations in the 1975 were close to the Sacramento region's 2000 population is quite
revealing.
TABLE 3. COMPARATIVE GROWTH, 1975-2000
1975 Population 2000 Population Change 1975-2000
Atlanta 1.79 million 4.11 million +2.2 million
Cleveland 1.97 million 2.95 million +1.0 million
Denver 1.41 million 2.58 million +1.2 million
Houston 2.23 million 4.67 million +2.4 million
Miami 1.44 million 3.87 million +2.4 million
Minneapolis 2.01 million 2.97 million +1.0 million
Phoenix 1.22 million 3.25 million +2.0 million
Pittsburgh 2.32 million 2.36 million +40,000
San Diego 1.59 million 2.81 million +1.2 million
Seattle 1.41 million 3.55 million +2.1 million
Among these ten urban areas, the only one that did not grow by a million or more was Pittsburgh,
but Pittsburgh, along with Cleveland, are the two cities least like Sacramento. In fact, if the growth
in these other cities from 1975 to 2000 is a good comparison, the forecast of 800,000 growth by
2027 for Sacramento might turn out to be too low.
The State Department of Finance's growth forecast, used by SACOG, also meets two common
sense tests. Sacramento's population in 2002 was just over 5 percent of the statewide total of 35
million. With 800,000 growth by 2027, Sacramento would get 7 percent of the 14 million people
the state expects to add. It makes sense that Sacramento would grow faster than other parts of the
state. Environmental constraints and the high cost of land and housing during the 1990s began to
constrain growth along the coast and in the Bay Area, yielding a boom in the Central Valley.
Employers seek access to urban services and labor markets, so cities like Sacramento and Fresno
become the most attractive growth sites in Northern California. Furthermore, it makes sense that
California's high population growth will continue. The number of people entering their twenties,
the high childbearing years, will be greater in the upcoming decades than it was during the 1980s
and 1990s, and people are living longer as well. The biggest share of growth, however, comes from
in-migration to the state, and particularly foreign immigration. Foreign immigrants, accompanied
by a traditionally high birthrate in immigrant families, are likely to keep coming to California more
14

than to other states, attracted by good climate, good job opportunities, Californians' acceptance of
cultural diversity, and large communities of recent immigrants for support (especially for those
coming from Latin America and Asia). In fact, 2000 Census data reveal that within California,
Sacramento has become the most ethnically diverse region in the state.
15

4. MEETING THE PLAN’S GOALS
HOW THE 2006 MTP MEETS SACOG’S TRANSPORTATION PLAN GOALS
Based on an analysis of transportation and related issues in the region, the MTP 2025
Roundtable developed ten carefully worded goals that were adopted by the SACOG Board of
Directors in October 2000. Table 4 lists the goals that guided development of the MTP 2025. Few
would disagree with these goals, but each one entails some unanswered questions, policy issues,
and trade-offs. A brief discussion of each goal, issues relating to it, and what the 2006 MTP
does or does not do to meet the goal follows below.
The MTP 2025 also used a set of performance indicators to measure progress toward these
goals. Please refer to the MTP 2025 document for these indicators. The 2006 MTP uses these
same performance indicators for two scenarios, the transportation system in 2005 and the
transportation system in 2027 with projects included in this plan. These are shown in Table 6
and Maps 3 and 4 (in the next chapter), where they are explored in greater detail.
1. OVERARCHING GOAL: QUALITY OF LIFE:
Develop a fully-integrated, multi-modal transportation system to serve as a catalyst to enhance the
quality of life enjoyed by the current and future residents of the Sacramento region.
"Quality of life" is defined in different ways, but people tend to know when it's getting better or
getting worse for themselves. For most people, quality of life includes some consideration of
housing, jobs, schools, neighborhood, environment, and lifestyle activities. SACOG heard
testimony praising the vitality of urban communities and disparaging the blandness and isolation of
suburban communities, but a California Poll in Spring 2002 found the greatest satisfaction with
quality of life in the suburbs, with Roseville highest in the region. This overarching goal served as
the anchor for development of the other goals of the MTP 2025.
Questions and Trade-offs: Because quality of life means different things to different people, it
becomes hard to measure. Some people, for whom flexibility is most important, want to be able to
drive anywhere anytime. Others, for whom a clean environment matters more, want people to leave
autos at home and ride transit or bicycle more often. The components of quality of life involve
investment and policy trade-offs, affecting economic development, community services, land
development, open space, and environmental programs. Consensus often proves elusive.
What’s in the Plan: The 2006 MTP is designed to meet regional travel needs for all types of
purposes as far as financially feasible, over the long term. In the development of the MTP
2025, the Roundtable recognized that transportation is closely connected with many other issues –
such as health and safety, social equity, the environment, land use, and economic vitality – and
developed goals and actions in the MTP to address these issues.
How the Plan Meets This Goal: The test of meeting this goal is the success of the plan in meeting
all of its other goals.
16

TABLE 4. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN GOALS
1. OVERARCHING GOAL: QUALITY OF LIFE. Develop a fully-integrated, multi-modal
transportation system to serve as a catalyst to enhance the quality of life enjoyed by the current and
future residents of the Sacramento region.
2. ACCESS AND MOBILITY. Improve access to goods, jobs, services, housing, and other
destinations; provide mobility for people and goods throughout the region, in a safe, affordable,
efficient and convenient manner.
3. AIR QUALITY. Develop a transportation system and related strategies that contribute to
achieving healthy air in the region.
4. TRAVEL CHOICES. Provide affordable, convenient, safe, and integrated travel choices.
5. ECONOMIC VITALITY. Enhance the economic vitality of our region by efficiently and
effectively connecting people to jobs, goods, and services, and by moving goods within our region
and beyond with an integrated multi-modal freight system.
6. EQUITY. Pursue a transportation system that addresses the needs of all people in all parts of the
region and assure that impacts of transportation projects don't adversely affect particular
communities disproportionately.
7. TRANSPORTATION AND LAND USE. Influence land use policies to improve access to jobs,
services and housing to everyone in the region by using market forces and the regulatory process.
8. FUNDING AND REVENUE. In order to adequately fund the MTP 2025, develop appropriate,
innovative, equitable, and stable funding sources (both short- and long-term) and identify costreduction
measures.
9. HEALTH AND SAFETY. Improve the health of our residents by developing systems that would
encourage walking and biking, and improve the safety and security of people on all modes in all
areas.
10. ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY. Develop the transportation system to promote and
enhance environmental quality for present and future generations.
17

2. ACCESS AND MOBILITY:
Improve access to goods, jobs, services, housing, and other destinations Provide mobility for
people and goods throughout the region, in a safe, affordable, efficient and convenient manner.
Access (the ability to get somewhere) and mobility (the ability to move easily and quickly to get
there) are interrelated concepts for transportation. Land use becomes closely related: the way cities
and towns are designed can minimize travel distances, which in turn can improve access and
mobility. Congestion limits mobility and access, particularly during peak commute hours, which in
turn affects housing and job choices.
Questions and Trade-offs: With growth in population, the desire for continued high mobility and
accessibility requires larger transportation facilities, which in turn can bring undesirable community
impacts. Most people prefer to travel by auto, which provides the most mobility in a city the
density of Sacramento, but transit yields fewer community impacts. The MTP 2025 faced
investment trade-offs: between capacity improvements and maintenance, rehabilitation, and
operations; among transit, road and bicycle improvements; among strategies such as street
widenings, traffic signals, or carpool lanes; and among individual projects.
What’s in the Plan: The MTP proposes strategies to address both access and mobility and
acknowledges that certain major corridors, including I-80 and U.S. 50, need major investments in
all types of transportation to maintain and improve both access and mobility in face of the growth
in travel that is expected. Significant expansions are planned for the public transit system,
including commuter rail, light rail, bus service, circulator van service to serve neighborhoods, and
bus rapid transit service on some busy commute corridors. Major new road projects are planned
as well, notably connectors to link Roseville with Sacramento Airport (the Placer Parkway),
Rancho Cordova with Roseville, and Elk Grove with Rancho Cordova and El Dorado County.
Bicycle and pedestrian projects are included as a lump sum, with the regionally-funded projects
selected from SACOG’s Regional Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Trails Master Plan using the
competitive Bicycle and Pedestrian grant program. Also, most road improvements should include
features to improve bicycling and walking. Congestion-relief projects and programs include
carpool lanes on the major freeways, highway bypasses around smaller cities, improvements to
highways connecting our region with counties to the north, freeway-to-freeway connection
improvements, high-tech information systems on local arterials and highways to smooth the flow of
traffic, freeway patrols to clear off incidents quickly, and management programs such as rideshare
and incentive programs for commuters to use alternative transportation. Local road
improvements, including road widenings, intersection improvements, and roads serving new
developments, were submitted to SACOG for inclusion in the MTP by local jurisdictions, with
many of the projects to be funded wholly or in part by local developers or development fee
programs.
How the Plan Meets This Goal: Mobility, as measured by congestion levels, generally worsens
over the 2006 MTP period because road and transit investment does not keep pace with growth.
Congestion points vary depending on where growth is taking place and the capacity of the
surrounding transportation system. Investments in the MTP, in both roads and transit, do make a
positive difference in some of the worst congestion areas. Accessibility, as measured by the
18

ability to reach job centers in a reasonable period of time by auto and transit, generally
diminishes in the MTP period, although transit accessibility to some job centers is increased.
3. AIR QUALITY:
Develop a transportation system and related strategies that contribute to achieving healthy air in
the region.
The Sacramento region's ozone pollution is among the worst in the United States, in large part
due to topography and meteorology, although transportation contributes more than 60 percent of
emissions. Local surveys identify air pollution as a major health concern, causing asthma and other
lung problems. The region is classified as a "severe air quality non-attainment" area by the federal
Environmental Protection Agency. In July 2005 a new 8-hour federal air quality standards for
ozone took effect and a new rate-of-progress air quality plan is being prepared on an interim basis.
A major new air quality plan to meet the 8-hour federal standard will be ready by July 2007. If this
new standard is not achieved by the 2007 plan’s deadlines, the region will or face additional
planning requirements and possibly financial sanctions that will inhibit the its ability to expand the
transportation system. As the region grows in population, more driving causes more air pollution,
and the greatest emissions occur at the start and end of trips. Fortunately, vehicle technology has
progressed and continues to improve dramatically, and as newer vehicles replace older ones, air
quality will gradually improve. An analysis of this MTP will show conformity to the region's rateof-progress
clean air plan, which means the improvements it proposed will not undermine
achievement of the standards.
Questions and Trade-offs: Controversy still swirls about the best way to attain clean air.
Reductions in auto trips clearly offer benefits, along with major social and economic consequences.
Better transit service offers people a choice, but relatively few are choosing to ride. No
transportation strategy promises an easy, economical, and effective result for clean air except better
vehicle technology, and on that front many people have been choosing to buy large, more-polluting
vehicles in increasing numbers in recent years – although because of recent high gas prices there is
now a counter-trend towards low-polluting hybrid gas-electric vehicles. No equitable and
reasonable strategy has been found to deal with the small number of vehicles responsible for most
emissions: heavy trucks and older, poorly maintained autos. No consensus exists about how to deal
with weather as an overriding factor, and whether the region would be willing to restrict or increase
the cost of driving to help attain clean air.
How the Plan Meets This Goal: The 2006 MTP includes continued funding for incentives for
using clean air technology in heavy duty vehicles (the SECAT program), travel reduction through a
transportation demand management program and the Spare the Air program, and other effective air
quality strategies toward the day when the region is considered an “attainment area” for air quality.
The plan also funds alternative modes of transportation – public transit operations, bicycle and
pedestrian projects and community design projects that support smart growth development – that
will make cleaner forms of transportation more attractive. The plan continues funding for the
regional rideshare program, which is the only adopted transportation control measure included in
the State Implementation Plan. The 2006 MTP conforms to the 2005 Clean Air Act deadline
for lowering ozone emissions, and now that the Yuba/Sutter air basin has been determined to
19

e in attainment of the 8-hour ozone standard, emissions levels are no longer an issue in that
area. However, more emissions reductions will be necessary to keep the area in attainment
indefinitely.
4. TRAVEL CHOICES:
Provide affordable, convenient, safe, and integrated travel choices.
The residents of this region overwhelmingly travel by auto: In 2005, 47% percent of all trips are
taken driving alone, 46 percent travel two or more to a car, 6 percent travel by bicycle or walking,
and less than 1 percent ride public transit (although transit carries 3 percent during commute
periods). Providing choices will be a necessity in the most heavily traveled corridors in the region,
where travel demand is rapidly increasing and where we will need as many ways as possible to
travel.
Questions and Trade-offs: The public supports increases in transit service, but when it comes time
to travel, transit is "for the other guy." Transit operators have struggled to find a way to make
transit both convenient enough and affordable, so that it becomes an attractive choice. Some
believe encouraging carpools would be a better strategy and others seek to encourage bicycling and
walking for short trips. The region has nowhere near enough funding to allow all other modes of
travel to function comparably to the auto anytime soon, even with increasing congestion. The dayto-day
cost of driving, even with recent gas price increases, is relatively low and its convenience so
high that some believe pricing of peak period road use may be the only way to level the playing
field among modes (the way telephone, electricity, and airline services are priced) an idea without
widespread support.
What’s in the Plan: The 2006 MTP invests significant funding into offering travel choices to
current and future residents. Major increases in rail, bus, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities are
envisioned, along with promotion of telecommuting and ridesharing. In this plan, the public transit
system of the region will become integrated through information technology and universal passes,
bicycles will be accommodated on buses and trains and welcome on streets, pedestrians will feel
more comfortable crossing arterials, and children will feel safer walking to school.
How the Plan Meets This Goal: At the regional level, people are not expected to change their
modes of travel significantly. However, transit can capture a much bigger share of travel in
certain higher-density areas, and where there are higher costs for using autos. Community design
changes and additional bikeways and pedestrian facilities can improve this situation to some degree
for shorter trips.
5. ECONOMIC VITALITY:
Enhance the economic vitality of our region by efficiently and effectively connecting people to jobs,
goods, and services, and by moving goods within our region and beyond with an integrated multimodal
freight system.
20

Employers and business owners cite access to jobs for employees and access to businesses for
freight delivery, primarily by truck, as important issues for economic prosperity. They note the
need for a comprehensive public transit system for commute trips (including a program for those
who are transitioning from welfare to work), other alternatives to driving, congestion reduction on
streets and highways (especially important for time-sensitive truck deliveries), a well-maintained
road system, and good access to airports and the Port of Sacramento. If these access and mobility
issues are ignored, businesses may choose to relocate elsewhere, either to the outer edges of the
region where these issues are not yet severe, or to other regions.
Questions and Trade-offs: All the needs noted would cost far more than the revenue reasonably
expected to be available, even with the voter approval of Measure A in Sacramento County in
2004. A healthy economy raises issues about impacts from a burgeoning number of trucks on
freeways and local streets. Good interregional highways are critical for commerce, but have
subsequently enabled long-distance commuting too. The region has not found a way to ensure local
jurisdictions will provide affordable housing for all incomes near jobs, in all parts of the region, to
improve accessibility and shorten commuting. Some people believe worksite parking, free and
readily available everywhere except downtown Sacramento, to be a major factor in commute
choices, but the idea of pricing of workplace parking is not widely popular.
What’s in the Plan: The 2006 MTP includes new roads that connect areas around the periphery
of the urban core, providing better access to the region’s three major job centers – downtown
Sacramento, Rancho Cordova/Folsom, and South Placer County. It also includes significant new
light rail and bus transit, carpool lanes for commuters, and a larger Transportation Demand
Management program to help cut down on solo driving. The Downtown-Natomas-Airport rail
line and road improvements in the airport vicinity will provide better access to Sacramento Airport,
and other improvements do the same for Mather Airport and the Port of Sacramento. Finally,
investment in road maintenance and rehabilitation, particularly a problem in rural areas where
farm-to-market truck travel is important, is included in this plan.
How the Plan Meets This Goal: In spite of the projects in this 2006 MTP, accessibility to job
centers is shrinking due to congestion, particularly at bottleneck points such as the American
River crossings. On the positive side, new connector roads will offer bypasses to downtown for
commerce, connections to other regions will improve, and carpool lanes on the freeways will
help clear up congestion that slows down trucks.
6. EQUITY:
Pursue a transportation system that addresses the needs of all people in all parts of the region and
assure that impacts of transportation projects don't adversely affect particular communities
disproportionately.
Equity involves four issues: whether all communities have reasonable and affordable transportation
access, to what extent communities suffer impacts from transportation facilities that pass through
them, whether those who cannot or choose not to drive have reasonable transportation options, and
whether tax revenues get distributed fairly region-wide and provide benefits for all taxpayers.
Major arterials and freeways pass through various communities, bringing traffic impacts from autos
21

and trucks coming from and going to communities beyond in both directions. With the MTP 2025,
SACOG inserted a regional viewpoint into the political discussion that in recent years has been
largely fragmented and localized.
Questions and Trade-offs: All communities send residents traveling through their neighbors'
streets, but transportation facilities are not evenly located and some communities complain about
disproportionate impacts. Investment in regional-scale facilities cannot be divided piecemeal, but
must be concentrated onto large projects of system-wide importance, regardless of location. The
benefits, however, accrue to all who travel. All jurisdictions need funds for maintenance,
rehabilitation, operations, and improvements, and look to a fair share of regional funding to help
beleaguered budgets. The division of funding between transit and roads becomes an equity issue as
well, because drivers paying gasoline taxes expect road improvements while the most effective
investment for the system may be in transit.
What’s in the Plan: This 2006 MTP incorporates the priorities of local communities, with many
of these local projects paid for from local funds. Major projects of regional concern are distributed
throughout the region as well. The plan will provide alternative transportation – public transit,
bicycle, and pedestrian facilities – for those who can’t or don’t drive. The plan includes Jobs
Access Reverse Commute funding, which is intended to offer convenient transit for entry-level
workers, particularly those transitioning from welfare to work. Community circulator van
routes will supplement the mainline transit system, offering more convenient travel by transit from
neighborhoods, particularly important for elderly and disabled persons. Finally, a large increase
in paratransit service (door-to-door wheelchair-equipped van service called for in the Americans
with Disabilities Act) is included for the expected increase in the elderly population over the plan
period. The Environmental Impact Report that accompanies the MTP 2025 (and which is referred
to in the EIR Addendum attached to this MTP) addresses impacts on low-income and minority
communities.
How the Plan Meets This Goal: The amount of funding reserved for public transit in this plan is
consistent with the MTP 2025 and demonstrates the region’s commitment to balancing the
investment in the major modes of transportation – roads and transit. Many of the transit projects
intentionally benefit lower-income communities. Local priorities have been respected in the
plan, but regional priorities have taken precedence for the first time with regional sources of
funding.
7. TRANSPORTATION AND LAND USE:
Influence land use policies to improve access to jobs, services and housing to everyone in the
region by using market forces and the regulatory process.
The region has come to understand that transportation plans must be more closely linked to
both land use plans and the progress of land development if we are to rein in sprawling growth.
Public agencies can use transportation funds to influence the course of development, by providing
facilities to support developments and by offering incentives to shape the form of development.
SACOG expects congestion to grow beyond the region's willingness and ability to afford relief, so
changes in land development patterns that can reduce travel demand become ever more important
22

to the transportation system.
Questions and Trade-offs: Until recently, no consensus existed in the region about how to
accommodate the growth in population and jobs. SACOG’s Blueprint Transportation and Land Use
Study ended in December 2004 with Board of Directors consensus on a regional 2050 land use
scenario that assumes “smart growth” strategies in most jurisdictions in the region. These strategies
include mixed use and compact development, infill, a mixture of housing types, quality building
design, and preservation of open space. Modeling shows that these land use strategies reduce the
number and length of auto trips. SACOG, in collaboration with member jurisdictions, is currently
developing a Blueprint-based 2030 land use map to use in the “next generation” MTP to be adopted
in 2007.
What’s in the Plan: A Community Design incentive program, which can pay for planning
grants to local governments and for transportation improvements that complement “smart growth”
projects, would encourage people to make local trips, use public transit, walk, and bike. Appendix
B describes this program. Also included in the plan is open space in the form of land easements
accompanying regional connector roads. Investment in the transportation system near the urban
edge offers opportunities to set aside open space and direct development to areas that can get good
access
How the Plan Meets This Goal: The $500 million investment in Community Design incentives in
the MTP 2025, which is continued in this plan, inclusion of open space in conjunction with road
projects, and the Transportation-Land Use Study cannot be evaluated for effectiveness yet, but
they are all expected to influence the effectiveness of the transportation system.
8. FUNDING AND REVENUE:
In order to adequately fund the MTP 2025, develop appropriate, innovative, equitable, and stable
funding sources (both short- and long-term) and identify cost-reduction measures.
Federal statutes require urban transportation plans to be constrained by revenues "reasonably
expected to be available" to the region. On the other hand, a plan that ends up too constrained lacks
vision for the regional future, and arguably undermines the rationale for seeking more funding. The
MTP 2025 forecasted revenues about 50 percent higher than the previous 1999 MTP, using some
expansive assumptions. Even so, revenues fell 20 percent short of being able to fund all transit
service needs in urban Sacramento, 20 percent short of road maintenance needs in rural counties,
and 30 percent short of some road improvements planned by cities and counties. Road maintenance
has been under funded statewide at least since the 1970s, and deferred maintenance leads to
pavement cracking, damage below, and eventually rehabilitation costs four to ten times higher than
timely maintenance would have cost.
Questions and Trade-offs: The MTP 2025 faced decisions about what to assume for renewal of
Sacramento County's Measure A sales tax (renewed in 2004), continued flow of federal
discretionary funds to the region, and future gasoline tax and transit fare levels, and whether to
assume new taxes of any type. The sources of and restrictions on revenues in some cases allow
choices and in other cases force trade-offs between capital investments and maintenance and
23

operations, and between transit and road expansion. In the long run, the gasoline tax declines while
sales tax revenues increase, making transportation programs more dependent on a less stable
revenue source. Capital programs in transportation have traditionally relied on pay-as-you-go
funding, but the need for improvements faster than revenues become available points to
consideration of bond financing. Road pricing lurks in the background, politically unattractive
today but a revenue source with far-reaching implications and large revenue potential.
What’s in the Plan: The 2005 MTP projects that $27.5 billion in federal, state, local, and
developer funds will become reasonably available in the next 22 years. This presents opportunities
for the region to meet more of its transportation needs, some long overdue.
The plan takes into consideration that Sacramento County voters approved a renewal of Measure A,
the ½ percent sales tax for transportation that expires in 2008. The plan assumes that another
measure will be approved in this life of this plan, providing the equivalent of a 2/3 percent sales
tax. It also assumes that federal and state funding sources based on gas taxes will increase,
although this source will ultimately decline as cars become more fuel efficient or more reliant on
alternative fuels. It assumes that federal grants will continue. The plan proposes to double sales
tax funds for public transit operations in Sacramento County, and reports a need for further
operating funds to increase service. It also reports an estimated $1.5 billion shortfall for road
maintenance in the rural counties, and recommends seeking new sources of local funds for that
purpose. Many funding sources are restricted to capital uses only, and local funds represent the
kind of flexible funding needed for maintenance and operations. To the extent that road
maintenance backlogs are dealt with in this plan, road rehabilitation costs will be reduced.
How the Plan Meets This Goal: The 2006 MTP has made expansive assumptions to
accommodate a reasonably expansive vision and identifies shortfalls.
9. HEALTH AND SAFETY:
Improve the health of our residents by developing systems that would encourage walking and
biking, and improve the safety and security of people on all modes in all areas.
Obesity has recently been declared an epidemic in this country, and the predominant use of the
automobile has been blamed as at least part of the problem. Many cite obstacles to safe and
comfortable walking and biking in cities and suburbs as a root cause. Some people feel insecure or
threatened riding transit, and that acts as a deterrent to ridership. High speed rural roads, in
particular two-lane state highways, have been known to foster higher fatal accident rates when
daily traffic grows to 12,000 or higher, which cuts down passing opportunities, leading impatient
drivers to resort to unsafe driving behavior.
Questions and Trade-offs: Consensus on strategy and priorities for bicycles and pedestrian travel
has somewhat improved recently, with the adoption of SACOG’s Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Trails
Master Plan. High-priority projects of regional significance in this plan can be funded with the
competitive Bicycle and Pedestrian Funding Program. This will improve the climate for bicycling
and walking, where needs far outstrip funds. Transit crime has not been a major problem, but
insecurity when riding with passengers who behave in unfamiliar ways still deters people from
24

iding transit, with no obvious solution. The best solution for rural roads at high risk for fatal
accidents usually involves adding capacity, an expensive solution with only modest payoff
considering the amount of traffic, but so-called "blood alleys" often crowd to the front of priority
lists. Preventive planning, aimed at adding capacity before problems develop, runs the risk of
admitting liability by identifying the road as deficient, especially given the long lead time to design
and build road improvements in rural environments.
What’s in the Plan: Pedestrian and bicycle plans and projects have received set-asides in the
plan, both to develop local and regional systems, and improve conditions along existing roadways.
This funding is supplemented by the amount allocated for the Community Design Program,
which will include pedestrian and bicycle improvements associated with smart growth
developments. Local road and state highway safety-related improvements are included, such as
those slated for Routes 65, 70, and 99 in Placer, Yuba, and Sutter Counties. Freeway service
patrols are also funded in this plan and SACOG in a separate program funds freeway call boxes.
Freeway message signs are likewise a safety measure since they warn motorists of upcoming
travel conditions such as fog or heavy traffic. Public transit security, both for passengers and
their parked cars, is a priority because people will be much more likely to use transit if they feel
safe doing so. Finally, the plan expects replacement of the Folsom Dam Road with a separate
bridge downriver, to deal with a national security issue, with most of the funding expected to come
from the Federal Bureau of Reclamation.
How the Plan Meets This Goal: The plan envisions that current safety and security systems will
continue and that bicycle, pedestrian, and highway capacity improvements will increase safety.
10. ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY:
Develop the transportation system to promote and enhance environmental quality for present and
future generations.
Environmental sustainability has become a major issue of debate, so far focused mainly on global
climate change, oil supplies, land consumption, and water. With the Sacramento region slated to
add around 3/4 million in population between 2005 and 2027, open space, habitat protection and
clean air and water command continuing attention. Sprawl development prevalent in recent years
consumes land, energy, and other resources more than would be the case with more compact
development. These patterns may be neither desirable nor sustainable in the long term, unless the
region is willing to accept the kinds of community and natural impacts and constraints found in
sprawled urban regions like Los Angeles.
Questions and Trade-offs: It is by no means clear whether society can sustain our present level of
mobility indefinitely, or how to do it. Likewise the specter of global climate change has become
accepted but remains poorly understood, with agreement on what to do about it (in particular CO 2
emissions from motor vehicles) even less clear. Some believe energy prices will adequately
regulate energy consumption, including gasoline use, while others worry that the shift to moreenergy-efficient
vehicles will occur too slowly to avoid periodic crises that become challenging for
transportation. The region needs to consider near-term economic sustainability with long-term
environmental sustainability. Through the Blueprint project, the region began to develop a
25

consensus about the role of transportation in promoting sustainable growth and land development,
and this consensus will be enacted through the revision of land use plans that is currently
underway, and in the MTP to be adopted in 2007.
What’s in the Plan: The MTP 2025 included a number of projects and programs that mitigate
environmental issues. The air quality program will help the region to attain air quality standards.
Open space is attached to some of the regional connector projects in the form of conservation
easements, intended to protect agricultural areas and other open space from development in areas
that are not zoned for development. The open space acquired with transportation funds is intended
as a seed, to spur preservation of nearby open space in a greenbelt. The MTP 2025 was
accompanied by an Environmental Impact Report (and this plan is accompanied by an Addendum
to that EIR) that evaluates the plan in terms of its likely environmental impacts as well.
How the Plan Meets This Goal: The 2006 MTP provides more capacity to the transportation
system to sustain economic health in the region, provides funding to preserve open space,
encourages compact land development through the Community Design incentive program, and
promotes air quality.
26

5. COMPARING ALTERNATIVE TRANSPORTATION FUTURES
HOW DOES SACOG ANALYZE AND COMPARE ALTERNATIVE FUTURES?
In developing an MTP, SACOG uses travel demand models to examine how the
transportation system works, now and in the future, under alternative scenarios. Modeling is
also used to project harmful air emissions for air quality conformity purposes.
Transportation models run on a computer, making millions of calculations quickly. In simplest
terms, the models add up the travel behavior of all of the people in the Sacramento region
and explain how that affects the transportation system. Models can provide information about
travel today, and forecast travel in the future, but do not make decisions. A brief summary of how
SACOG's two models work can be found in the Appendix J. Modeling assumptions are found in
Appendix D.
SACOG also uses data, research, and mapping to look at the impacts of the transportation
system on surrounding communities and the natural environment. A summary of the
community and environmental impacts of the MTP 2025 is found below; those wanting more
information on these impacts should refer to the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) accompanying
the MTP 2025 and the Addendum to the EIR developed for this 2006 MTP.
WHAT ALTERNATIVE FUTURES WERE CONSIDERED?
In preparing the MTP 2025, the Roundtable developed study alternatives that separately
emphasized transit, roads, and community design, comparing those to each other and to the existing
1999 MTP. The resulting preferred alternative was a hybrid that performed better on many
measures than the 1999 MTP.
In this plan, two alternative transportation futures were compared -- the MTP 2025 and the 2006
MTP. Here is how they are different:
• The timeframe for the MTP 2025 was 2002-2025 and the timeframe for the 2006 MTP is
2006-2027.
• The 2006 MTP project list is the same as the MTP 2025 project list except for projects that
have been built since 2002, and therefore eliminated, and a few new projects that have been
added. These new projects are largely developer-built serving areas that were indicated for
development in the MTP 2025, where development has progressed to the point that actual
roads are now designated.
• Some projects have changed in scope or cost since the MTP 2025 was completed, but the
changes are minor.
27

WHAT KINDS OF INFORMATION DO THE TRANSPORTATION MODELS PRODUCE?
SACOG's models analyze and report four general kinds of information:
• System performance -- how well different parts of the system handle the total travel
demand, using measures such as vehicle miles traveled, traffic congestion levels on
roadways, transit travel times, and hours of delay in traffic jams. The congestion index, a
particularly interesting measure, describes the time spent driving in congested conditions on
a peak hour trip (rather than degree of congestion at particular places on the system).
• Mode choice -- to what extent people choose to drive alone, ride in carpools, ride transit,
bicycle, or walk.
• Accessibility -- how far a person can travel in a given time, and how many jobs and
activities are available within that travel radius. The accessibility index describes how many
of the region's ten largest job areas can be reached from each residential community, within
20 minutes driving time or 45 minutes riding transit.
• Air quality -- the amounts of four kinds of pollutants -- NOx (nitrogen oxides),
hydrocarbons (combine with NOx to yield ozone, the unhealthy smog of summer
afternoons), particulates (known as PM-10), and carbon dioxide (CO2) -- emitted by onroad
motor vehicles, calculated by a separate air emissions model.
Each of these kinds of information can be compared several ways: from one alternative to another,
as a regional average, between one community and another, and from the present to future years.
WHAT DID SACOG LEARN FROM MODELING FOR THE 2006 MTP?
The $27.5 billion in projects in the 2006 MTP, given a 800,000 increase in the region's
population between 2002 and 2027, will substantially improve transit service, substantially
lessen the increase in congestion, and maintain better accessibility around the region than if
the projects were not built. Individual travel behavior on the system with the travel
conditions of 2027 will not change much. Certain projects might yield localized environmental
impacts, but the overall impacts from $120 billion in land development and other infrastructure
would be an order of magnitude greater. The transportation system's impacts on existing
communities might be different after projects are built, but overall impacts resulting from the
expected increase in travel without improvements would be comparable.
IN LOOKING AT SYSTEM PERFORMANCE IN THE MTP 2025 SACOG LEARNED
THAT:
Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) per capita rises due to longer trips. In the period 2000-2025,
total VMT increases by 58 percent, from 43.2 million daily today to 68.6 million daily in 2025,
compared to a 49 percent population increase. Looked at another way, the average person drives
28

22.9 miles per day in 2000, which increases to 24.4 miles per day by 2025. With most growth at the
edges of the metropolitan area, in suburbs with lower-than-average densities and little mixing of
housing and jobs, trips lengthen, both for work and local errands. Limited transit service in these
areas leaves the auto as the best choice for all but very short trips. More VMT means autos on the
road longer, which in turn means more congestion and more air pollution.
Congestion generally gets worse, because road and transit investment does not keep pace with
growth. The MTP 2025 expanded the capacity of the transportation system by about 20 percent,
while VMT grew by 58 percent. Today, on average, 15 percent of a driver's time on the road during
commute hours is spent in congestion, but by 2025 that becomes 24 percent. That means congested
travel becomes 60 percent slower, lengthier, or more widespread. Occasional congestion becomes
more common, light congestion worsens, and heavy congestion during peak hours intensifies and
spreads. These conclusions still hold true for the 2006 MTP, consistent with the MTP 2025.
For the purpose of illustrating how the 2006 MTP projects will affect the region’s travel
patterns, Maps 3 and 4 offer a comparison. Map 3 shows congestion in 2005, and Map 4
shows congestion in 2027 with the capacity-increasing projects in the plan. Table 5 shows
some key performance indicators under the two conditions that were modeled, 2005
conditions and 2027 conditions.
On Maps 3 and 4, green represents either no congestion (the typical case in rural areas of the
region), or typical urban travel conditions (periodic slowing, occasional stop and go traffic), yellow
represents heavy congestion through peak hours each weekday (continuous slow or stop-and-go
traffic, similar to heavy Sacramento congestion today), and red represents what most Sacramento
drivers would consider near-gridlock: solid congestion (stop and go traffic, on the scale of the Bay
Area or Los Angeles) for more than three hours every morning and afternoon.
Table 5. Key Performance Indicators for the 2006 MTP
(weekday)
Indicators Year 2005 Year 2027
VMT per capita 22.3 23.4
Vehicle trips per capita 3.2 3.5
Daily mode shares Carpool – 46.5%
Transit – 0.9%
Bike/Ped – 6.2%
SOV – 46.4%
Peak period mode shares Carpool – 9.8%
Transit – 2.6%
Bike/Ped – 5.4%
SOV – 82.2%
Percent growth in vehicle
trips, 2005-2027
Percent growth in vehicle
miles traveled, 2005-2027
Carpool – 46.9%
Transit – 1.1%
Bike/Ped – 6.1%
SOV – 45.9%
Carpool – 10.9%
Transit – 3.0%
Bike/Ped – 4.9%
SOV – 81.2%
-- 33.5%
-- 33.3%
29

The modeling shows that that congestion worsens unevenly around the region, but generally
continues a twenty-year trend that has seen congestion shift outward toward suburban
locations. Large increases in population or employment tend to increase congestion on connecting
corridors. Some corridors have spare capacity to start with, and improvements add to capacity and
lessen congestion, or in certain cases provide alternate routes that shift traffic and congestion from
one area to another. A comparison of travel demand against capacity today shows a few wellknown
bottlenecks where the system overloads:
• on both Watt Avenue and Sunrise Boulevard near the American River, demand exceeds
capacity by 100 percent,
• on I-80 at the Capital City Freeway, demand exceeds capacity by 60 percent,
• along the Capital City Freeway, on Route 99 in south Sacramento, on U.S. 50 near Folsom
and El Dorado Hills, on I-80 at Roseville, and at downtown Sacramento freeway
interchanges, demand exceeds capacity by 25-50 percent, and
• on I-80 through Natomas and along several arterials, such as Madison, Folsom, Power Inn,
Calvine, and Douglas, in particular near freeway interchanges, demand reaches or slightly
exceeds capacity.
A rule of thumb says it takes an extra hour to drain away traffic congestion where demand exceeds
capacity by 50 percent.
A similar comparison for 2027 puts today's congestion in stark perspective, although the models
say some people actually will choose to travel at different times or to different places to avoid
congestion this bad.
• on much of Watt, Sunrise, and Hazel, particularly near the American River and U.S. 50,
demand will exceed capacity by 50-150 percent;
• on downtown Sacramento freeways and interchanges and across the Pioneer Bridge on U.S.
50 to West Sacramento, demand will exceed capacity by 75-125 percent;
• on parts of five key arterials-Madison, Folsom, Bradshaw, South Watt, and Power Inndemand
will exceed capacity by 50-100 percent,;
• on the Capital City Freeway, I-80 as far as Roseville, and Route 99 as far as Elk Grove
demand will exceed capacity by 40-100 percent;
• on U.S. 50 near Sacramento State University and between Folsom and El Dorado Hills,
demand will exceed capacity by 25-75 percent; and
• along most of I-5 in the urban area, on I-80 through Natomas and across the Yolo
Causeway, on Route 65 through Roseville, and on major arterials such as Florin Road and
Greenback Lane, demand will reach or slightly exceed capacity.
Investments in highway, carpool, or transit capacity in a corridor are shown to reduce
congestion. The congestion index, measuring very heavy congestion encountered during a
peak hour trip, set at a regional average of 100 today, would rise to 175 region-wide by 2025
without the improvements in that were included in the MTP 2025. The congestion index today
varies greatly around the region, ranging from 10 up to 250. Some areas clearly need added
capacity more than others do. For example, the transportation system serving downtown
30

Sacramento has been built with high capacity historically, so congestion levels fall somewhat
below the regional average, whereas many suburban areas fall well above the regional average
resulting from growth with little transportation investment during the past 20 years.
If all improvements in the MTP 2025 (and continued in the 2006 MTP) were to be completed,
the congestion index region-wide in 2025 would only rise to 150. This still means the
congestion index ends up 50 percent worse as a region-wide average compared to today. It
worsens more in high growth areas such as Vineyard or Lincoln, or areas with relatively few
improvements such as Antelope or Carmichael. Corridors with significant new investment in both
roadways and transit, like the U.S. 50 corridor, show improvements even with high growth rates.
Carpool lanes, which carry two to three times as many people as regular lanes, and added lanes on
congested arterials, particularly help reduce congestion. Even so, so the congestion index increases
almost everywhere: Davis and Woodland go to 100, Arden-Arcade to 150, South Sacramento to
170, Folsom to 190, Fair Oaks and Orangevale to 210, Citrus Heights to 230, Roseville and Elk
Grove to 250. Only El Dorado Hills improves, and then only to a quite-congested 210. Heavy
traffic appears in some less-urban parts of the region with little or no congestion today. These
numbers show both the effect of overall growth in travel well outpacing road and transit
investment, and the relative value of particular investments in specific areas. 8
IN LOOKING AT MODE CHOICE IN THE MTP 2025, SACOG LEARNED THAT:
At the regional level, people do not change travel modes significantly. The MTP goals call for
providing a range of travel choices, but people continue to prefer the auto for most travel. In 2000,
50 percent of all trips drive alone in autos, carpools comprise 43 percent, transit handles less than 1
percent (90,000 riders per day), and 6 percent bicycle or walk. Even with a plan that heavily
emphasizes transit improvements, by 2025 total transit ridership barely doubles (180,000 riders per
day), or 1.2 percent share of trips. Congestion at the levels found in Sacramento in 2025 or 2027 is
nowhere near severe enough to entice many people to switch to transit. Indeed, in nearly every
major urban area around the country, even those such as the Bay Area and Los Angeles with
extreme congestion, people gradually shifted away from transit to driving during the 1990s. Thus
even the small increase in transit use reverses a decade-long trend in the opposite direction. The
typical response to heavy congestion involves finding a new route or cutting through
neighborhoods to get out of the traffic jam, not switching to transit or bicycling. In our hectic urban
world, few people are willing to forego the auto's advantages -- convenience, flexibility, and shorter
travel time -- and choose transit, given the relatively low cost of driving and time lost to congestion
typical of Sacramento in 2025.
Unless community design changes prove successful, significant shifts from driving to bicycling
or walking remain unlikely. SACOG's models were unable to examine definitively localized
shifts to bicycling that might accompany community design changes, but at the regional level the
share of bicycle and walk trips in 2025 stays at 6 percent. Intuitively, the incentives and
improvements contained in community design should lead to more bicycling and walking. The
major objective here would be to reduce VMT by shifting short local trips, not necessarily
commuting and not necessarily during peak hours, although mixed-use developments might affect
8 The congestion index numbers were calculated for the MTP 2025, but not for the 2006 MTP.
31

commuting and community design might affect peak hour school trips to some extent.
IN LOOKING AT ACCESSIBILITY IN THE MTP 2025, SACOG LEARNED THAT:
Congestion reduces accessibility to job choices by auto. Accessibility represents the distance or
number of opportunities that can be reached within a certain travel time. In Sacramento today, the
average commute takes about 25 minutes, with most commute trips under 35 minutes. Going back
150 years, 35 minutes seems to represent a universal ceiling on average commute time, and
nowhere in the country today does the average exceed that time.
The spread of jobs to suburban locations slightly diminishes public transit accessibility to job
choices. The accessibility index also measures the number of job centers reachable within a 45-
minute period by transit. By 2025, accessibility to job centers by transit decreases by 10 percent
region-wide. For transit, the average disguises a wide range of accessibility, from zero in areas
without transit service, to as high as four in some areas with good Sacramento Regional Transit or
Yolobus service. On a more specific level, transit accessibility improves in only a few areas, in
suburbs of east and south Sacramento and Natomas, and along new Bus Rapid Transit routes.
Other areas showed a slight decline that is generally due to congestion and spread-out destinations
(requiring more bus stops), slowing down bus speeds.
Lessened accessibility due to congestion hurts businesses by reducing potential customers,
hampering truck deliveries, and shrinking their labor market. Both model data and SACOG's
1998 Suburban Travel Study show the accessible territory around business locations shrinking,
particularly in certain directions. The American River as a barrier becomes prominent, because
congestion at crossings becomes intermittent all day long. Even though between 2005 and 2027
jobs increase by around 40 percent or more in the three major job centers of downtown
Sacramento/West Sacramento, Rancho Cordova/Folsom, and Roseville/Rocklin, the accessible
labor market remains about the same in 2027 as it is now, increasing the competition for
employees. Excessive congestion in San Jose became a factor in high tech businesses choosing to
spread out to smaller cities such as Sacramento. Increasing congestion here could have a similar
effect for our business base.
IN LOOKING AT AIR QUALITY IN THE MTP 2025, SACOG LEARNED THAT:
Technological advances in controlling auto and truck emissions that lead to ozone pollution
overcome increases in vehicles and vehicle miles traveled over the 25-year period. The
emissions that lead to ozone (NOx and hydrocarbons) decrease significantly due to auto technology
improvements, some mandated by state law, and later by a gradual shift of the auto fleet to hybrid
fuel and non-gasoline autos. Particulates (PM-10), mainly from diesel exhaust and stirred-up road
dust, increase by 26 percent, but road travel contributes only about 15 percent of overall PM-10, so
this increase amounts to a marginal 4 percent in the big picture. Carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions, a
natural product of the clean burning of gasoline and diesel fuel, increase by 49 percent, directly
correlated to increased auto travel. The CO 2 increase comes out somewhat less than the 58 percent
increase in VMT by 2025 because of a modest improvement in fuel efficiency for the entire fleet, at
least partly due to hybrid and non-gasoline vehicles. CO 2 is a greenhouse gas linked in some
manner to global warming, not a direct health risk.
32

Sacramento expects to attain federal clean air standards by about 2013. New, harder-to-meet
federal standards (the 8-hour standards) have been approved effective June 2005. The region is
now developing an interim Rate-of-Progress State Implementation Plan for Air Quality (ROP SIP)
that will allow air quality conformity analysis and a finding for this plan. A new, full SIP for the
region will be ready by mid-2007. The Yuba/Sutter air basin is now considered to be in attainment
(except for the Sutter Buttes, which is considered a separate air basin).
Late-model autos are 50 times less polluting than 20-year old models (and new hybrid fuel autos
are better yet), so as older cars are retired to the junkyard, our air will get cleaner. A growing
population slows down progress on air quality, by adding to VMT. Eventually, community design
changes may lead to changes in travel patterns and lower VMT, but not in the short term. Other
ways to cut pollution may be needed in the near term.
FROM RESEARCH ABOUT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF TRANSPORTATION
PLANS, SACOG HAS LEARNED THAT:
Natural environmental impacts would not be substantially greater from the projects in the
plans, just different, and can be offset or mitigated for the most part. Impacts from
development far outweigh those from the transportation accompanying it. For example, the projects
in the MTP 2025 would lead to higher noise levels at 24 locations and lower noise levels at five,
but overall road noise would increase anyway from a 58 percent increase in VMT region-wide.
New bridges would affect riparian habitat along the rivers they cross, but so would increased traffic
on existing bridges. Road projects nowadays usually skirt around sensitive sites, and routinely
include mitigation where that is not feasible.
Continuation of recent development trends would place 90 percent of new growth at the
urban edge and consume at least another 100,000 acres for sprawl growth by 2025. Both the
MTP 2025 and the 2006 MTP try to encourage different development patterns. Studies in
Portland, Oregon, a region that has tried hard to control sprawl development, show that jobs move
to the urban edge faster if access to the central business district is choked off by congestion. The
2006 MTP puts investment in a community design program primarily within the existing urban
area. Community design programs show promising results in other cities. SACOG expects some
success in reining in urban sprawl, but still expects at least 80 percent of growth to go around the
urban edge.
Community impacts can be significant, and impacts from a 58 percent increase in VMT
region-wide would be substantial in any case. Rail lines and wider roads can divide communities,
but also link those communities to jobs and activities. Widened roads carrying heavy traffic make
impacts on the surrounding community and adjacent properties, but so does traffic cutting through
neighborhoods to dodge congestion on an inadequate main road. The more sprawl development is
reined in, the more traffic will need to use existing roads.
The 2006 MTP offers minimal benefits for either lower-income communities or more affluent
ones. Bus service and community circulator buses provide the most benefit in lower income areas.
Community circulator buses could serve local trips to grocery stores, medical facilities, and other
33

public services to meet the basic needs of low-income populations, as well as improving
connections to regular bus lines. The plan emphasizes investments inside existing urban areas,
which would benefit those in low-income communities as much as or more than those in wealthier
communities further out.
The economies of Yuba City and Marysville have lagged somewhat compared to the rest of the
region (and the State), with lack of freeway access a contributing factor. While the new
expressways on Routes 65, 70, and 99 contained in the MTP 2027 would remove some low-cost
housing, low-cost housing is plentiful in that area and the general economic boost for the whole
area from better accessibility should be an overall benefit.
HOW DO TRANSPORTATION MODELS WORK?
SACOG’S models contain several equations that tie together information about how people
choose where, when, and how to travel, based on trip purpose, minimum time, and affordable
cost. SACOG loads its models with five kinds of information: a map of the transportation system
(both roads and transit routes); description of the performance of the system (speeds of travel on
each link, the amount by which speed decreases as traffic increases, and the cost of travel); a map
of land uses showing where people live, work, and do other activities; data from the Census about
who lives where; and a description of people’s daily travel behavior (where, how, and why people
travel) learned from SACOG’s regional travel survey.
The models first calculate what would happen on the transportation system if everyone traveled
where, when, and how they wanted to, based on known behavior, travel time, and cost. The models
then make adjustments to account for traffic congestion, which causes some people to change
where, when or how they travel based on saving time or cost. The adjustments may be calculated
several times, and compared to actual counts of traffic and transit ridership. When models
accurately represent today’s known conditions, they are ready to estimate future conditions.
SACOG then loads more information: a map of an expanded future transportation system (or
several maps with different alternative future systems); some new information about future
performance of the system; and a map of future land uses, making assumptions about the size of the
population, the size of the employment base, and the places where new housing and businesses will
be built by a certain future year. The models assume basic travel behavior will remain unchanged,
that people will still travel for the same reasons in the future as they do now. The models then
calculate, make adjustments until no significant change occurs from one adjustment to the next, and
present the forecasted information.
COULD MODELS GIVE INACCURATE INFORMATION?
A model can give inaccurate forecasts if the information about current conditions or
assumptions about future conditions or behavior are inaccurate. SACOG has high
confidence about its models’ description of current conditions. Because those conditions can be
checked against actual traffic and transit ridership counts. The model does not replicate
unpredictable or unusual conditions, such as traffic accidents, road maintenance, or holiday travel
patterns. Our understanding about how people make their travel choices is less precise, because it
34

is based on a survey, rather than comprehensive information collected and checked continuously. It
remains possible but unlikely that the models show today’s travel accurately, but for the wrong
reasons.
SACOG’s model must overcome more uncertainties in forecasting future conditions, as would
be the case for any kind of prediction about the future. The model is sophisticated enough to
take into account, on a region-wide average, travel changes as a household evolves from a young
family with working parents and children to a family with teenage drivers and eventually to a
family of retirees, and other young families come along behind. In fact, the models can take into
account many kinds of changes, but must specifically be told to do so. For example, travel cost
may change due to higher gasoline prices, parking fees, or transit fares. New technologies could
affect performance of the system; for example, connected traffic signal systems or autos with radar
that can travel safely closer together. The reasons and ways people travel might change; for
example, due to Internet shopping, telecommuting, or broader use of small, slow motorized
vehicles like golf carts or scooters. Clearly, things could evolve in different ways by 2025.
Changes such as these require SACOG to envision future conditions based on the way things
look now, and tell its models what to assume. A model’s calculations will be no better than
the vision and instructions it is given.
Future land use patterns generated the most contention. SACOG estimated future land uses
based on policies of current local General Plans, but development could unfold differently.
SACOG tried to develop a more sophisticated transportation model that not only would adjust
travel patterns away from highly congested areas, but was unable to get it ready to use in time for
this plan. Alternatively, SACOG could have developed one or more arbitrary different future land
use patterns and loaded them into its models, but chose not to do so because the work would have
been labor-intensive and costly with no up-front consensus as to what alternative patterns to use.
Historically, General Plans have not reflected future development patterns very accurately,
so the model’s forecasts do carry some risk of inaccuracy here, but still remain the best
information available.
35

6. THE CONTENTS OF THE 2006 MTP
WHAT IS THE RATIONALE FOR THE 2006 MTP PRIORITIES?
The 2006 MTP prioritizes improvements both for transportation deficiencies evident in 2002
and those expected to emerge through 2027. The following discussion lays out the need and the
purpose for the regional-scale improvements contained in this plan.
The amount and variety of travel in the major urban corridors shows the need for a combination of
investments in better public transit (both local and express), road capacity (for carpools on the
freeways and for all autos on arterials), new technology, bicycle and pedestrian facilities, and
improved community design.
Inside the urban area, the plan proposes giving priority to the worst congestion points first. Beyond
the urban area, the plan proposes to complete good state highway connections in all directions,
incrementally by 2027.
For the MTP 2025, SACOG examined the region's future with its travel model, to help inform
decisions about where and when to invest in improvements. The model provided new
understanding about travel patterns, particularly about where people want to go during peak periods
when the transportation system becomes congested. The analysis found:
• Growing suburb-to-suburb travel, between residential areas in southern and northeastern
Sacramento and new job centers in Rancho Cordova and Roseville;
• Continuing growth in commuting into downtown Sacramento and West Sacramento, driven
by continuing office and industrial growth;
• Increasing economic activity back and forth on the region's core corridor along U.S. 50, all
day long;
• Emerging commute patterns from rural and far suburban areas to new job centers near the
urban edge, in Rancho Cordova, Roseville, Natomas, and West Sacramento;
• Overlapping traffic patterns on all major corridors, with non-stop through traffic
intermingled with traffic stopping at a local destination along the way; and
• Burgeoning problems at certain key bottlenecks, principally river crossings and major
arterials lined with commercial development near freeway interchanges.
WHAT ARE THE SPECIFIC NEEDS AND THE KEY PROJECTS DESIGNED TO MEET
THEM?
The funding in this plan supports an extensive lineup of improvement projects, both regional
and local, and other programs to maintain and operate roads and transit services, bring new
technologies on line, change community design, and attain clean air. A list summarizing the
36

projects and programs of the Plan is found in Table 6, and a complete listing of the details is found
in Appendix E.
From a regional viewpoint, the need for new connections along two major travel corridors,
now carrying traffic typical of a freeway corridor but on arterial roads only, stand out:
1. The first will connect the business centers in Rancho Cordova and Roseville, and the
residential communities in between. This corridor is now served by Watt Avenue, Sunrise
Boulevard, and Hazel Avenue/Sierra College Boulevard, all notable for congestion and lack
of adequate transit service.
2. The second will connect residential and business areas along an Elk Grove/Rancho
Cordova/El Dorado Hills corridor. This corridor is now served by several mostly two-lane
roads: Bond, Sheldon, Calvine, Grant Line, Bradshaw, Sunrise, and White Rock Roads, all
becoming congested in recent years and served by no direct transit operations at all.
(See Table 7 for a listing of projects that comprise the connectors.)
To a significant degree, congestion on two freeways – Route 99 and Capital City Freeway – stems
from a combination of traffic bound for Rancho Cordova by way of U.S. 50, using the freeways to
avoid congestion on more direct arterial roads, and traffic bound for downtown Sacramento.
Communities along corridors in eastern and southern Sacramento County have in the past rejected a
freeway or beltway, so this plan proposes a high-capacity expressway/arterial roadway, such as the
existing Madison Avenue or 65 th Street, but including preservation of open space at strategic
locations to avoid drawing growth into areas not zoned for growth. It also would add Bus Rapid
Transit in the corridors, along Watt Avenue, Grant Line Road, and Sunrise Boulevard.
The computer model shows five other economic and commute corridors in urban Sacramento
needing more capacity: along U.S. 50 between Yolo and El Dorado Counties; into downtown
Sacramento, particularly from the north; between Roseville and Sacramento/Natomas;
between the South area and downtown Sacramento; and across the American River.
Major regional-scale corridors need capacity for all forms of travel (light rail, commuter rail,
express bus, local bus, carpools, autos, and bicycles) complementing each other, since different
forms are better suited for particular kinds of trips. This plan includes major improvements to four
of these corridors:
• Along U.S. 50, by extending rail westward to West Sacramento, putting in commuter rail
service between Davis and Sacramento, adding carpool lanes from Davis to West
Sacramento and from downtown Sacramento to Shingle Springs in El Dorado County,
improving arterial street access onto the corridor (particularly near Sacramento State
University), and expanding ramps on the freeway interchanges at I-5 and the Capital City
Freeway;
37

Table 6. Plan Summary
Total Cost: $27.4 Billion
The plan is constrained by reasonably expected revenues. It has been found to conform to air quality laws.
Regional Programs: $1.3 Billion
• Clean Air ($200 million + $69 million from existing SECAT program)
• Bicycle and Pedestrian projects that are regional priorities ($390 million)
• Community Design plans and projects to support smart growth ($560 million)
• Transportation demand management ($50 million)
• Landscaping and other enhancements ($22 million)
Public Transit: $9.1 Billion
• Continued expansion of the Capitol Corridor train service to 16 daily trains to the Bay Area.
• Commuter rail service between Davis/Dixon and Auburn using the UP/Amtrak facilities.
• Light rail extended to Natomas Town Center and Sacramento International Airport, from Meadowview to
Cosumnes River College and Elk Grove, from Watt to Antelope, and a streetcar line from Downtown
Sacramento to West Sacramento.
• Bus service significantly increased in Sacramento County to 400 buses in service compared to 190 today.
• Bus rapid transit in three commute corridors, including Stockton, Watt, and Sunrise.
• Expansion of bus and van service region-wide, including a large increase in service for elderly and disabled
persons.
Roads, Highways and Bridges: $9.3 Billion
• A Rancho Cordova to South Placer Multi-Modal Connector.
• A Placer Parkway connecting Roseville at Route 65 to Routes 99/70 near Sacramento International Airport,
incorporating conservation easements.
• Multi-modal connectors between El Dorado County, Rancho Cordova and Elk Grove, with protected open
space components.
• A replacement bridge over the American River for the Folsom Dam Road.
• A third Feather River Bridge near Marysville/Yuba City.
• Highway projects as detailed on the project list, including bypasses, interchanges, carpool lanes on I-5, I-80,
and U.S. 50, and improvements on Routes 99 and 70.
• Intelligent transportation systems projects including “smart corridors” on Arden Way, Watt Avenue, and
Greenback/Sunrise Boulevard.
• Local road projects as detailed in the project list, including developer-paid projects.
Road Maintenance: $6.2 Billion
• Catch up on local road maintenance in Sacramento County, but $860 million in maintenance and rehabilitation
needs remain in all other counties.
• State highway maintenance keeps up with need.
Local Bicycle and Pedestrian: $281 Million
• Projects or programs, or can be used to match the regional program.
Undefined Projects: $220 Million
• $80 million of flexible funding for access across the American River between Howe and Hazel.
• $140 million from federal discretionary programs.
38

TABLE 7
CONNECTOR PROJECTS
PLACER PARKWAY
• Placer Parkway – Study a new transportation facility between Route 65 to Route 99; $4,700,000; 2005
(PLA20720)
• Placer Parkway Phase 1 – In Placer County, construct new two-lane roadway between Route 65 and Route 99;
$370,000,000; 2027 (PLA20721). This project includes Route 99, new interchange Sutter County, north of
Sacramento; along Route 99 between Riego Road and Sankey Road, construct new interchange. The Placer
County portion of the entire project is $238,000,000; the Sutter County portion is $132,000,000.
• Placer Parkway – Protect open space to north and south of Placer Parkway, in western Placer County;
$30,000,000; 2016 (PLA20723)*
Total: $404,700,000
RANCHO CORDOVA – SOUTH PLACER CONNECTION
• I-80 – Widen existing Sierra College Boulevard Interchange from two to four lanes, including the on- and offramps
and loops; $28,548,000; 2007 (PLA19490)
• Sierra College Boulevard – In Rockin, Sierra College Boulevard from El Don to Nightwatch; widen from two to
four lanes; $950,000; 2010 (PLA20460)
• Sierra College Boulevard – Widen Sierra College Boulevard from two to four lanes from I-80 interchange to
Rocklin Road; $1,800,000; 2007 (PLA20470)
• Sierra College Boulevard –Widen Sierra College Boulevard from four to six lanes from Aguilar Tributary-
Nightwatch; $2,170,000; 2008 (PLA20500)
• Eureka Boulevard – Widen from two to four lanes, from Sierra College to city limits; $500,000; 2012
(PLA15720)
• Roseville Parkway – Extend Roseville Parkway over Union Pacific Railroad tracks; $4,900,000; 2010
(PLA20970)
• Sierra College Boulevard – Widen Sierra College Boulevard from Olympus Drive to north city limits from two to
four lanes; $3,700,000; 2006 (PLA20250).
• Sunrise Avenue – Widen from four to six lanes from Sacramento County line to Madden lane; $5,000,000; 2015
(PLA15890)
• Sierra College Boulevard – South Rocklin city limits to Douglas; widen road from two to four lanes; $3,700,000;
2006 (PLA15600)
• Sierra College Boulevard – Widen from four to six lanes from N. of Douglas to Sacramento County line;
$5,000,000; 2020 (PLA20710)
• Sierra College Boulevard – Widen to six lanes from the Interstate to Aguilar Tributary; $2,000,000; 2007
(PLA15400)
39

• Sunrise Boulevard – Widen Sunrise Boulevard from four to six lanes including a raised median from Antelope
Road to Placer County; $6,200,000; 2022 (SAC16910)
• Sunrise Boulevard – Widen from four to six lanes including raised median from Oak Avenue to Antelope Road;
$7,634,906; 2016 (SAC16920)
• Sunrise Boulevard – Widen from four to six lanes, Arcada Drive to Oak Avenue including bike lanes,
landscaping, and pedestrian facilities; $8,750,000; 2019 (SAC22440)
• Greenback and Hazel – Build tunnels to underground the intersection of Greenback and Hazel; $20,000,000;
2025 (SAC23300)
• Hazel Avenue – Widen American River Bridge and approaches from four to six lanes and widen Hazel from
American River Bridge to Madison from four to six lanes with bike lanes and signals; $85,000,000; 2010
(SAC21500)
• Hazel Avenue – Widen from four to six lanes from Madison to Sacramento/Placer County line; $77,500,000; 2017
(SAC23080)
• Sunrise Boulevard Bus Rapid Transit – Implement Bus Rapid Transit on the Sunrise Boulevard corridor;
$30,000,000; 2013 (REG17430)
• Hazel Avenue – Add carpool and transit capacity between Madison Avenue and U.S. 50; $30,000,000; 2019
(SAC15370)*
• Hazel Avenue – Add grade separation, ramps, and frontage connections at Gold River Road; $20,000,000; 2018
(SAC15380)*
• Hazel Avenue – Add undercrossing, turn ramps, and community enhancements at Greenback Lane; $20,000,000;
2021 (SAC15390)*
• Hazel Avenue – Improve Madison Avenue intersection; $20,000,000; 2017 (SAC15400)
• Sierra College Boulevard – Improve Douglas Boulevard intersection; $10,000,000; 2023 (PLA15590)*
• Sierra College Boulevard – Improve Roseville Parkway intersection; $10,000,000; 2019 (PLA15610)*
Total: $403,352,906
ELK GROVE – RANCHO CORDOVA – EL DORADO CONNECTOR
• White Rock Road Realignment – In El Dorado County, White Rock Road from Manchester Drive to Latrobe
Road; realign and construct improved two-lane roadway; $2,226,356; 2006 (ELD10100)
• White Rock Road – Widen White Rock Road from the Sacramento/El Dorado County line to Latrobe Road from
two to four lanes; $1,708,000; 2006 (ELD10090)
• Route 99 – Reconstruct the Grant Line Road/Route 99 interchange; $57,680,000; 2007 (CAL20520)
• Alta Sunrise Boulevard – Construct a six-lane roadway from U.S. 50 to International Drive extension. This
includes a south-only interchange with U.S. 50 and pedestrian and bicycle facilities; $45,000,000; 2015
(SAC22980)
• Grant Line Road – Widen from Bond Road to Sloughhouse Road from two to four lanes; $11,000,000; 2010
(SAC19670)
40

• Grant Line Road – Widen from Sloughhouse Road to Sunrise Boulevard from two to four lanes; $4,000,000;
2011 (SAC19660)
• Sunrise Boulevard – Widen from north of Douglas Road to Grant Line Road from two to four lanes; $7,000,000;
2009 (SAC19710)
• Sunrise Boulevard – Widen from Route 16 to north of Douglas Road from two to four lanes; $15,000,000; 2016
(SAC19711)
• Grant Line Road – Add frontage roads to connect various local access roads that intersect Grant Line Road
between Elk Grove Boulevard and Sloughhouse Road; $25,000,000; 2014 (SAC20510)*
• Grant Line Road – Widen from two to four lanes, Route 99 to Bond Road; $12,000,000; 2012 (SAC20530)*
• Sunrise Boulevard – Add overcrossing and ramps at Route 16; $20,000,000; 2014 (SAC19720)*
• White Rock Road – Realign and widen with shoulders form Sunrise Park Drive to El Dorado County Line;
$20,000,000; 2017 (SAC23220)*
• Kammerer Road – Construct a four-lane roadway from Grant Line/Route 99 interchange to I-5 at Hood Franklin
Boulevard. Can be changed to widening of existing streets; $18,443,980; 2016 (SAC29905)
• Four-lane parkway connecting I-5 and Route 99 – (upgrade of Kammerer Road project); $31,556,020; 2021
(SAC29905)*
• New Road – Construct a new four-lane limited access road from Grant Line Road/White Rock Road through
Aerojet’s property to U.S. 50 near Hazel Avenue; $9,335,000; 2015 (SAC23160)*
• Open space acquisition - $15,000,000; 2010 (SAC23175)*
Total: $294,949,356
*Please note: For the purpose of modeling and costing, placeholder projects without sponsoring agencies have
been created. Studies will determine the final projects.
41

• Into downtown Sacramento from the north, by extending light rail north to Natomas and
Sacramento International Airport, adding carpool lanes to I-5, and improving arterials into
and through the downtown rail yards via Northgate Boulevard and Route 160;
• Between Roseville and Sacramento, by extending light rail northeast to Antelope Road and
double-tracking for express service, putting in commuter rail service between Sacramento
and Roseville (extending to Auburn), adding carpool lanes on I-80, expanding ramps on the
freeway interchange at I-80/I-5, and constructing the Placer Parkway to offer an alternate
route to relieve traffic on I-80; and
• Into downtown Sacramento from the south, by extending light rail south to Cosumnes River
College and Elk Grove, adding carpool lanes on I-5, and building a direct route for traffic
from the south area to Rancho Cordova to relieve traffic on Route 99.
The plan also accounts for local funding with which local agencies would improve parallel arterials
and bus service, including both local buses and express bus service using freeway carpool lanes, in
each of these corridors.
The 2006 MTP also recognizes the need to continue good access among all parts of the regiongreater
urban Sacramento, Davis, Woodland, Yuba City, Marysville, Lincoln, Auburn,
Placerville, and smaller communities-to support economic activity and development, as these
areas and traffic levels grow. The biggest challenge involves extending four-lane state highway
connections northward, via Routes 70, 99, and 65. The MTP 2025 includes building four-lane
expressways in all three corridors:
• On Route 70, bypassing East Nicolaus and later Marysville, extending north to Butte
County and Oroville,
• On Route 65, bypassing Lincoln and later Wheatland, and extending to Yuba City via a
new third bridge across the Feather River, and
• On Route 99, from Route 70 north to Yuba City.
The 2006 MTP funds local street and road improvements, such as intersection improvements,
safety projects, signal timing, widening in growth areas, and new connections for local access.
Local road improvements, including road widenings, intersection improvements, and roads serving
new developments, have been included in the plan by local jurisdictions. Some of these projects
may be funded using state or federal funds, but many are funded wholly or in part by local
developers or development fee programs.
The 2006 MTP proposes further study of access needs across the American River, and sets
aside $80 million of flexible funding for future unspecified improvements. The American River
Parkway is both a marvelous open space and recreational asset and a huge barrier to transportation.
All alternatives to improve access across the American River, from the Capital City Freeway east to
Hazel Avenue, where all bridges are congested today, proved too controversial in surrounding
42

neighborhoods and communities for the MTP 2025 or this plan to propose any specific
improvements. The challenges for the transportation system posed by the American River will not
go away, but solutions require more study and planning, and possibly more pressure from
worsening traffic conditions. Sacramento County is currently working on these further studies.
The 2006 MTP includes projects that will help manage the flow of traffic on the highways and
arterials, using new technologies. Intelligent Transportation Systems (or ITS) projects -- "smart
corridors" -- can smooth the flow of traffic on Watt Avenue, Greenback/Sunrise, and Arden Way.
Signal preemption systems will be installed for transit and emergency vehicles, as well as freeway
ramp meters, message signs, and cameras. Freeway service patrols will continue to clear accidents
and vehicle breakdowns quickly off of the freeways. Appendix C includes more information about
ITS plans and projects.
Caltrans is expected to spend $2.8 billion through 2027 maintaining and rehabilitating the
highway system and the 2006 MTP reserves $5.1 billion (in mostly local funds) for local road
and bridge maintenance and rehabilitation. Even so, more than $2.5 billion in local road
maintenance and rehabilitation will be deferred due to inadequate state gas tax funding. The region
supports efforts to provide additional funding from source(s) not yet determined to overcome this
shortfall during the upcoming 25 years.
The 2006 MTP reserves regional funds for programs that are important to achieving regional goals:
bicycle and pedestrian improvements, community design incentives, open space, travel demand
management, clean air, and enhancement programs.
• Bicycle and pedestrian access improvements in the 2006 MTP are not specified,
pending the results of applications to the Bicycle and Pedestrian Funding Program. The
plan includes $350 million in regional funds for projects that are prioritized in
SACOG’s Bicycle, Pedestrian and Trails Master Plan, adopted in 2005. In addition,
around $200 million in local funds is included for bicycle and pedestrian projects and it
is expected that most or all road improvements will include provisions for better bicycle
and pedestrian use.
• The Community Design grant program, which pays for capital and planning grants to
local governments and for bicycle, pedestrian, and streetscape improvements that
accompany "smart growth" projects, will encourage local trips and the use of alternative
modes of transportation. Appendix B is an excerpt from the Community Design
program guidelines and shows a list of projects that have been approved by the
SACOG Board of Directors for the first round of funding. These projects are
included in the 2006 MTP project list, unless already completed.
• SACOG intends to protect open space in this plan in the form of land easements
accompanying regional connector roads. Investment in the transportation system near
the urban edge offers opportunities to set aside open space and direct development to
areas that designated for good access.
43

• Transportation demand management programs such as the regional rideshare
program, marketing of alternative modes of transportation, and incentive programs for
carpooling, vanpooling, bicycling, walking, telecommuting, and using public transit will
encourage people to use alternative forms of travel and cut down on driving. These
programs are included in the 2006 MTP. The regional rideshare program is a
continuing transportation control measure (TCM) first adopted in the 1982 State
Implementation Plan.
• The 2006 MTP includes a regional air quality program that provides incentives for
implementing clean air technology, travel reduction, and other effective air quality
strategies, until the region reaches a clean air status. These programs can include
continuation of the annual "Spare the Air" campaign conducted by the Air Districts as
well as the SECAT program for installing cleaner operating engines in heavy-duty
diesel truck.
Most of the improvements proposed in this plan are needed now, or at least in the next few
years. The funding, however, is spread across all 22 years, and gradually ramps up from
$925 million in the earlier years to $1.4 billion in later years. Thus some improvements must
await funding. The region intends to proceed with environmental studies and engineering for
many of the major improvements proposed in this plan. Once consensus has been reached to
proceed with construction, the region intends to examine financing opportunities that could allow
funds to be advanced and needed projects built sooner. Sacramento County’s new Measure A sales
tax extension, for 2009 to 2039, will be a source for financing early project construction, but the
projects and schedule for bonding have not yet been identified as of early 2006.
44

7. PAYING FOR THE 2006 MTP
WHERE DOES $27.5 BILLION COME FROM?
The MTP 2025, upon which this 2006 MTP is based, projected $22.5 billion of funding available to
pay for its list of projects. For a full discussion of these revenue projections, please refer to the
MTP 2025 document. An updated revenue projection has been developed for the 2006 MTP, as
explained below.
The funding to support the 2006 MTP is complex to explain and understand, and comes from
many sources-federal, state, and local-each with specific purposes and restrictions, totaling
$27.5 billion during the 23 years, 2005-2027. The region expects the following transportation
funding and investments:
• Federal funds totaling $5.8 billion, with $5.4 billion (93 percent) coming from the Federal
Highway Trust Fund (backed by an 18.3 cent per gallon federal gas tax) and $400 million (8
percent) from federal general funds. Of these federal funds, $1.6 billion must be used for
roads and $1.6 billion can only be used for transit, with the remaining $2.6 billion usable for
either. Congress has set up most federal programs to build projects-less than 10 percent of
federal funds can be used to pay for maintaining roads or operating transit services.
• State funds totaling $4.7 billion, with $4.2 billion (89 percent) coming from the State
Highway Account (backed by an 18 cent per gallon state gas tax) and Proposition 42 (sales
tax on gasoline) and $530 million (9 percent) from various other funds. Of these state funds,
$2.2 billion must be used for state highways and $700 million can only be used for transit,
with the remaining $1.8 million usable for either. The state Legislature, like Congress, uses
most state programs to build projects, but Caltrans ends up using about one-third of the state
funds for state highway maintenance. In addition, about one-quarter of the state transit
funds can be used for operating costs. The rest must be used for construction projects.
• Local funds totaling $12.9 billion, from the local share of gas taxes, local sales taxes, transit
fares, general funds, and fees from development. Of these local funds, approximately $6.4
billion must be used for roads, $5.7 billion must go to transit, and the remaining $800
million can nominally be used for either purpose. Voter-approved sales tax programs, in
fact, specify how funds may be used. Most local funds can be used for operations and
maintenance, and in fact, must be used for those purposes, because most other federal and
state funds cannot be.
• Developer-built major roads worth $4.1 billion, with the developer doing the construction.
These roads are built or improved specifically as part of new developments and include an
estimated $1.7 billion for arterial streets and $2.4 billion for new local residential streets
inside developments.
45

The MTP 2025 assumed, and the 2006 MTP continues to assume, some revenue increases in
line with historical trends. Five times in the past 23 years, Congress or the Legislature increased
federal or state gas taxes, so the 2006 MTP assumes similar increases during the next 21 years.
Likewise, Sacramento Regional Transit increased transit fares periodically, and the 2006 MTP
assumes that will happen in the future also. The current 1/2 percent sales tax for transportation in
Sacramento County (Measure A) was renewed in the fall of 2004, and at 1/2 percent through 2039,
and the MTP assumes an additional Measure B at a level of 1/4 percent, starting in 2016, which
would yield the same overall revenue through 2027 as the previous assumptions. No decisions
have yet been made that indicate 2016 would be a preferred target date to implement a Measure B,
and, unlike in 2002, both Yolo and Placer Counties are now considering local sales taxes of their
own, though implementation remains undecided there too. The 2006 MTP also presumes that the
region will continue to receive funds from federal discretionary programs (not guaranteed to this
region) at a rate comparable to recent years. Table 7 lays out revenue forecasts year by year. Those
wanting more detail about revenue assumptions should refer to Appendix D.
The MTP 2025 also contemplated more speculative revenue increases, with no historical precedent,
because additional funding is needed, however these are not included in the 2006 MTP. These
included transportation sales taxes in the five counties beyond Sacramento, which do not have them
now, plus a region-wide gas tax, for which SACOG presently has no statutory authority, which
could bring in additional revenues.
WHAT RESTRICTIONS COME WITH THESE FUNDS?
As noted above, Congress, the Legislature, voters, and various laws restrict the uses of most
transportation funds to specific purposes. The region and local agencies cannot always satisfy
their most critical needs or highest priorities because of these restrictions. For example, $16.3
billion can only be used for roads and $8.0 billion can only be used for transit. That still leaves $3.3
billion usable either way.
The most critical restrictions force the region, local agencies, and Caltrans to use at least
$14.9 billion for construction projects. That leaves only $12.6 billion available to pay for road
maintenance and transit operations. SACOG heard different views around the region as to
whether $14 billion is enough for construction, but the amount remaining and the way it gets
distributed around the region put a squeeze on both road maintenance and transit service.
One critical funding squeeze falls on road maintenance in El Dorado, Placer, Sutter, Yolo,
and Yuba Counties. Caltrans and the region's six counties and twenty cities report significant road
and highway maintenance and rehabilitation needs out to 2027, including an $800 million backlog
of deferred maintenance as of 2002. Caltrans expects to get enough funding to take care of state
highway maintenance, and Sacramento County jurisdictions need to defer less road maintenance
with continuation of the current 1/2 percent sales tax for transportation beyond 2009. The other five
counties, however, face an estimated $2.7 billion in road maintenance and rehabilitation needs,
including a $475 million backlog of deferred maintenance as of 2002, with only about $1.2 billion
in local funds available. The region confronts a difficult choice: use regional capital funds for road
rehabilitation and forego improvements to support regional economic vitality and development, or
46

seek more local funding to take care of the road rehabilitation need, in small counties with limited
tax bases.
Another critical funding squeeze effectively puts a cap on transit service in Sacramento
County. Sacramento Regional Transit (RT) forecasts a need for more than $3 billion to continue
operating the bus and light rail system it has now through 2027. Fare revenues will provide only 30
percent of this amount, and another 30 percent currently comes from Sacramento County's 1/2
percent sales tax for transportation (one-third of which supports RT operations). Even with the
renewal of Measure A at 1/2 percent through 2039, RT may only be able to afford to build and
operate two light rail extensions and expand its bus service by about 50 percent by 2027. This falls
far short of RT's 20-Year Vision in the MTP 2025, under which RT's 23-year operating cost would
rise to nearly $5 billion. The region again confronts a difficult choice: if it wants more transit
service in urban Sacramento, voters must agree to increase the sales tax by another 1/4 percent,
with all of that going to transit, or find about $40 million per year from some other source. The
2006 MTP assumes that the voters who approved a continuation of the 1/2 percent sales tax for
transportation in Sacramento County in 2004 will agree to an additional 1/4 percent increase by
2016.
This discussion points out an important trend: looking ahead to 2027, sales taxes become the
key source of transportation funding, instead of gasoline taxes. Sales tax revenues increase with
both economic growth and inflation. On the other hand, gasoline taxes are pegged in cents per
gallon, and will inevitably decline, as autos generally become more fuel efficient, and hybrid and
alternate fuel cars become more common. In urban counties at least, voters have historically proven
willing to approve sales taxes for transportation, while the Legislature has proven unwilling, for at
least the past thirty years, to raise the local share of gas taxes to keep up with road maintenance and
rehabilitation costs. Sales taxes already play a leading role in supporting the region's two most
critical needs, covering more than half the cost of transit operations in this region, and rivaling the
gas tax as a funding source for road maintenance.
WHO DECIDES HOW TO SPEND THE $27.5 BILLION?
Of the $27.5 billion, roughly 18 percent comes to the region, 21 percent belongs to Caltrans,
and the remaining 61 percent is available to local agencies (counties, cities, and transit
districts). Federal law (both TEA-21 in 2002 and now SAFETEA-LU) requires urban
transportation plans to be financially constrained, which limited what the MTP 2025 could include
to revenues reasonably expected to be available. The 2006 MTP again commits the projected
revenues to a proposed list of projects, essentially the same list as in the MTP 2025 except for
projects completed during the years 2002-2006.
Most regional funds come to SACOG, but a portion goes to two other regional agencies: Placer
County Transportation Planning Agency and El Dorado County Transportation Commission. Table
7 shows revenues by year and Table 8 estimates how the region would use the funds.
47

Table 8: REVENUE ESTIMATES - SUMMARY BY YEAR - MTP for 2006-2027
(millions of current dollars de-escalated to 2005)
GRAND
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 TOTAL
Funds to the Region
STIP:RTIP share - state to region 77.2 74.2 71.3 68.4 86.8 104.1 101.0 89.9 87.0 84.1 89.4 86.6 83.8 89.6 87.1 83.1 89.4 86.6 84.0 81.4 78.9 76.4 $1,860.4
CMAQ - federal to region 22.1 21.9 21.6 21.3 23.3 23.4 21.2 20.9 18.8 18.6 22.0 21.7 21.4 21.2 20.9 20.8 24.6 24.3 24.0 23.7 23.4 23.1 $484.4
Regional STP - federal to region 17.4 17.2 17.0 16.8 20.1 21.0 20.7 20.5 20.2 19.9 23.8 23.5 23.2 22.8 22.5 23.1 27.5 27.1 26.7 26.3 26.0 25.6 $488.7
FTA 5307 transit formula - federal to region 19.9 20.2 20.5 20.8 21.1 22.2 22.6 22.9 23.3 23.6 24.0 24.4 24.8 25.1 25.5 27.1 27.5 27.9 28.4 28.8 29.3 29.7 $539.5
FTA 5309 rail formula - federal to region 3.8 3.8 3.9 4.0 4.0 4.1 4.1 4.2 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.6 4.7 4.8 4.8 4.9 5.0 5.0 5.1 $97.3
FTA 5309 bus - federal to region 2.9 3.0 3.1 3.1 3.2 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 3.9 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.3 4.4 $80.0
FTA 5309 New Rail Starts-federal to region 10.7 26.2 24.0 37.0 37.0 62.4 62.4 62.4 62.4 62.4 22.8 22.8 22.8 22.8 36.3 36.3 36.3 36.3 $682.7
FTA 5310 E&H transit - federal to region 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 $11.1
FTA 5311b rural transit - federal to region 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 $16.4
State Transit Asst. (STA) - state to region 4.9 5.0 5.1 5.1 8.2 11.1 11.1 8.6 8.7 8.7 8.8 8.8 8.8 11.5 11.6 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.1 9.0 9.0 $189.3
Federal discretionary pgms. - to region 16.1 16.1 16.2 16.2 17.7 17.7 17.7 17.8 17.8 17.8 19.5 19.5 19.5 19.5 19.6 19.6 21.4 21.4 21.5 21.5 21.5 21.6 $417.2
SUB-TOTAL 176.1 188.6 183.5 193.8 222.5 270.3 265.4 251.7 246.9 244.1 219.3 216.6 213.8 222.2 197.0 192.7 245.8 243.0 240.3 237.8 199.0 196.5 $4,866.9
Funds to the State (Caltrans)
STIP: ITIP share - state 52.5 51.1 49.8 48.5 58.5 65.7 61.7 56.2 52.5 51.6 57.1 56.2 55.4 59.4 58.8 55.8 62.0 61.3 60.6 60.0 59.4 58.8 $1,253.2
Intercity Rail - state 10.8 10.4 10.5 34.1 9.5 9.2 9.1 11.2 8.9 8.8 8.7 8.7 8.6 68.2 8.4 8.3 8.2 8.1 8.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 $284.5
Traffic Congestion Relief Pgm - to local 91.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 $116.0
SHOPP - state 125.0 125.0 125.0 125.0 125.0 125.0 125.0 125.0 125.0 125.0 125.0 125.0 125.0 125.0 125.0 125.0 125.0 125.0 125.0 125.0 125.0 125.0 $2,750.0
St.Hwy. maintenance - state 43.6 44.6 45.6 46.6 47.6 48.7 49.7 50.8 51.9 53.1 54.2 55.4 56.7 57.9 59.2 60.5 61.8 63.2 64.6 66.0 67.4 68.9 $1,218.0
SUB-TOTAL 322.9 256.1 230.9 254.2 240.6 248.6 245.5 243.3 238.4 238.5 245.1 245.3 245.6 310.5 251.4 249.5 257.1 257.6 258.2 258.9 260.7 262.7 $5,621.7
Funds to Local Agencies
STP (for FAS) - federal to region to local 2.7 2.6 2.6 2.5 2.8 2.0 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.8 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.1 $40.7
Transport'n Development Act(TDA) - local 81.3 83.4 85.6 87.9 90.2 92.6 95.1 97.6 100.3 103.0 105.7 108.6 111.6 114.6 117.8 121.0 124.4 127.8 131.4 135.0 138.8 142.7 $2,396.3
Gas tax subventions - state to local 77.4 97.5 95.7 73.8 94.7 123.5 121.7 108.9 107.0 105.1 103.4 101.7 99.9 109.8 108.2 108.4 106.2 104.0 102.0 100.0 97.9 95.8 $2,242.6
Sales tax (Measure A) at 1/2% - local 103.6 106.3 109.1 111.9 114.8 117.8 120.9 124.0 127.2 130.6 133.9 137.4 141.0 144.7 148.4 152.3 156.3 160.3 164.5 168.8 173.1 177.6 $3,024.7
Sales tax (Measure B) at 1/4% - local 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 67.0 68.7 70.5 72.3 74.2 76.1 78.1 80.2 82.2 84.4 86.6 88.8 $929.2
Transit fares - local 39.6 39.4 41.6 41.4 51.5 51.2 51.3 52.7 52.4 62.6 63.3 62.9 63.1 62.7 72.8 74.3 73.9 73.5 75.6 81.8 81.4 81.0 $1,349.9
Impact fees from development - local 37.5 37.5 37.5 45.6 48.6 67.2 67.5 67.8 68.1 68.4 67.6 67.9 68.3 68.6 69.0 105.1 105.5 105.9 106.3 106.7 107.2 107.6 $1,631.5
Private developer in-kind projects - local 103.1 103.1 103.1 103.1 103.1 165.6 165.6 165.6 165.6 165.6 162.4 162.4 162.4 162.4 162.4 272.7 272.7 272.7 272.7 272.7 272.7 272.7 $4,064.6
Special district funds - local 13.6 13.6 13.6 13.6 13.6 13.6 13.6 13.6 13.6 13.6 13.6 13.6 13.6 13.6 13.6 13.6 13.6 13.6 13.6 13.6 13.6 13.6 $299.2
General funds and other (roads) - local 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 $396.0
General funds and other (transit) - local 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 $176.0
Caltrans Discretionary to Local Agencies 16.6 16.4 16.2 15.9 18.4 18.1 17.8 17.6 17.3 17.1 19.7 19.5 19.2 18.9 18.6 18.4 21.3 21.0 20.7 20.4 20.1 19.8 $409.0
SUB-TOTAL 501.4 525.9 530.9 521.7 563.7 677.5 681.4 675.7 679.4 693.8 764.8 770.8 777.5 795.6 813.0 969.1 979.2 986.2 996.3 1010.6 1018.5 1026.8 $16,959.7
TOTAL - All funds 1,000.4 970.6 945.3 969.7 1,026.8 1,196.4 1,192.3 1,170.7 1,164.7 1,176.4 1,229.2 1,232.7 1,236.9 1,328.4 1,261.4 1,411.3 1,482.1 1,486.8 1,494.8 1,507.3 1,478.2 1,485.9 $27,448.2

Table 9: Summary of Funding and Expenditures 2006 - 2027
TOTAL
State Highway Capital $2,049,000,000
Local Road Capital $6,094,000,000
Transit Capital $2,940,000,000
State Highway Rehabilitation and Maintenance $2,750,000,000
Local Road Rehabilitation/Maintenance $5,835,000,000
Transit Operations/Maintenance $6,222,000,000
Other** $1,558,200,000
Sub-total of Committed Funds $27,448,200,000
Total Funding Available 2006 - 2027 $27,448,200,000
** Other includes community design, clean air, bicycle/pedestrian, demand
management/carpool match, and undefined projects.
The region expects to receive $3.5 billion in federal and state funding for projects, plus
another $1.4 billion in federal transit funds to be passed through to local transit agencies.
SACOG intends that funds coming to the region be used for regional-scale projects, either in
the 2006 MTP or in future MTPs: to fund clean air programs, community design initiatives,
connections serving downtown Sacramento and suburban job centers, more capacity in highdemand
corridors, light-rail system extensions, ramp improvements at congested freeway
interchanges, improvements to promote bicycle travel, and use of new technologies for better
system operations. The region has made few improvements to the capacity of the regional-scale
system-freeways, light rail, and major arterials-in the past twenty years, during which time most
extra capacity built into the system in the 1960s and 1970s has been consumed by growth in travel
and traffic. The MTP 2025 presented an opportunity to begin those long-overdue investments.
The 2006 MTP forecasts that Caltrans will receive $5.6 billion during the next 23 years for
state highways and intercity rail service. Of this amount, $4.1 billion will go for state highway
maintenance and rehabilitation, from Caltrans' annual budgets. Another $321 million will pay for
intercity rail service, mainly the Capitol Corridor trains, with 85 percent of it going to operating
costs. SACOG expects Caltrans to invest $1.2 billion into state highway improvements in this
region, from its program that funds interregional highway improvements statewide. That amount is
based on an estimate of this region's share of the larger program, not on what improvements are
needed. Indeed, SACOG expects to have to invest an additional $1.1 billion into state highway
improvements using regional funds, representing one-quarter of the regional program.
Local agencies control the remaining $17.0 billion, with which they must maintain local
streets and roads, operate transit services, and fund local improvements. The MTP 2025
49

identified street and road maintenance and operation of transit services as primarily local
responsibilities, with limited regional support, so that regional funds could be used for regional
needs. The 2006 MTP shows $3.8 billion available to local agencies for street and road
maintenance and rehabilitation. The 2006 MTP shows $4.6 billion in locally controlled funds
available for operation of transit services region-wide. The remaining $4.6 billion comes from
funds restricted to construction projects, which local agencies can use for improvements such as
traffic signals, turn lanes, street and road widenings, highway interchanges, bike lanes, sidewalks,
bus stops, and new buses. In the MTP 2025, SACOG expected to supplement local investment
with regional funds: $1.8 billion for rail transit expansion and new and replacement buses, $600
million for road improvements, $500 million for community design, and $600 million for bicycle,
pedestrian, and clean air programs.
IS THIS FUNDING ENOUGH?
$22.5 billion was not enough to fund the needs identified in the MTP 2025, but $27.5 billion is
still inadequate for the needs of the 2006 MTP.
In the MTP 2025, local agencies would be short an estimated $2.5 billion for road maintenance and
rehabilitation, especially in the rural counties. The $2.5 billion represents 30 percent of the total
need region-wide, but 50 percent of the overall need in the five rural counties. Sacramento would
not have enough money to operate the amount of transit service needed in an urban region of 2.8
million people. The $4.3 billion projected to be available fell 19 percent short of covering
Sacramento Regional Transit's 20-year Vision Plan.
Even though about $7.6 billion would be available for highway and road improvements in the MTP
2025, this fell short by at least 30 percent in trying to keep up with an expected 40 to 50 percent
increase in traffic, so congestion would worsen. The MTP 2025 anticipates $500 million in bicycle
and pedestrian improvements, but SACOG has a list totaling $750 million now and has completed a
regional bicycle and pedestrian master plan that will add to this amount. SACOG expects $500
million for community design to show the way to new development patterns different from
suburban sprawl. To achieve meaningful success on a regional scale, private developers and local
redevelopment agencies must decide to invest seriously in community design as well. As of now,
SACOG can see no other sources of funds likely to be dedicated to transportation to deal with
these shortfalls.
50

8. IMPLEMENTING THE 2006 MTP
HOW DOES THIS 2006 MTP LEAD TO PROJECTS GETTING BUILT?
The MTP 2025 provided a long-range vision for short-term transportation funding decisions,
and the 2006 MTP continues this vision into implementation.
SACOG assigns federal and state funds to carry out projects from the long-range plan,
through a series of documents called Transportation Improvement Programs, or TIPs. Any
agency using federal or state funds for projects must deal with as many as four different
kinds of TIPs:
• Regional Transportation Improvement Program or RTIP -- SACOG specifies projects
to receive federal and state funds made available by the California Transportation
Commission, going out five years into the future. The RTIP serves as an application to use
the federal and state funds for the projects specified.
• State Transportation Improvement Program or STIP -- the California Transportation
Commission brings together RTIPs from all over the state into the STIP, which extends five
years into the future. The Commission authorizes the use of state funds for all the projects
included as well as a federal program, Transportation Enhancements Activity (TEA).
• Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program or MTIP -- SACOG specifies
projects to receive three types of federal funds granted directly to the region: Regional
Surface Transportation Program (RSTP), Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ),
and various Federal Transit Administration funds, going out three years into the future.
SACOG sends the MTIP to Caltrans, including both projects funded directly and projects
contained in the STIP, and it serves as an application for all projects to receive federal
funding of any type. This MTP will be accompanied by a new MTIP.
• Federal Transportation Improvement Program or FTIP -- Caltrans packages MTIPs
from all over the state into the FTIP, which covers three years into the future, and sends it to
the Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration. The federal
agencies currently approve the FTIP by October of even-numbered years, and authorize the
use of federal funds and consideration of federal permits for the projects specified.
The process to prepare and approve the series of four TIPs takes a year, with public review
and approval at the local, regional, state, and federal levels in sequence. This process involves
counties, cities, and transit districts seeking federal funds for their projects, SACOG selecting
which projects to fund, and two state agencies and two federal agencies reviewing and approving
the projects, funding amounts, and schedules for work. From time to time, SACOG may amend the
TIPs, with approval by the other agencies involved when projects or costs or schedules change, a
process that takes up to three months.
The TIPs must satisfy three federal and state requirements:
51

1. Implementation of the MTPs -- By law, TIPs are used to implement the regional
transportation plan (called the MTP in the SACOG region), so all projects in upcoming
SACOG TIPs must come from or be consistent with the current MTP, with the priorities
expressed in the MTP as a guide as to which projects to fund next.
2. Financial Constraint -- All projects must have enough funding assigned to them to
complete work, and the total cost of projects in the TIP cannot exceed an estimate of the
total amount of funding expected to be available.
3. Air Quality Conformity -- SACOG must analyze the projects in the TIP, using a
prescribed computer model and process, and find that those projects, if completed, would
not contribute to air pollution that exceeds an amount specified in the region’s clean air
plan, which in turn is based on requirements or standards in federal air quality law.
These same three requirements also apply to TIP amendments, whether projects are being added,
modified significantly, or taken out.
For a project to move forward to construction, it must be included first in the MTP and the
most recent TIP, but those steps are more the beginning than the end of the story. The TIPs
authorize SACOG and state and federal agencies to provide funding for four phases of actual
project work: environmental studies, engineering and design, acquisition of rights of way,
and construction. Once the agency doing the work is ready to start a project or continue to the
next phase, it must ask the appropriate agencies to allocate funds from the TIP to the project, a
process that can take a couple of months.
This 2006 MTP guides investment of transportation funds 22 years into the future, between
2006 and 2027, by laying out a general sequence of improvements and projects. MTPs must be
reexamined and updated at least every four years, but this 2006 MTP will be updated in 2007 (it
will be called the MTP 2030), when a new 8-Hour State Implementation Plan for Air Quality has
been completed and the Blueprint-based 2030 land use allocations can be used as a basis for the
transportation system. The process of developing the MTP 2030 has already been started with a
major public outreach effort.
Agencies may proceed with project work once programmed funds have been allocated from the TIP
to the specific project. Planning and programming thus follow a cycle, normally repeating every
two or three years, closely linked. The newest federal transportation legislation, SAFETEA-LU,
specifies a four-year cycle for regional transportation plans, and SACOG will modify its MTP-
MTIP cycle accordingly.
WHAT PROJECTS GET BUILT FROM THE 2006 MTP DURING THE NEXT THREE TO
FIVE YEARS?
The 2006 MTP anticipates further progress and completion of projects started in past TIPs
and currently underway, and directs the start of some new projects. Each project moves from
environmental studies to engineering/design to right-of-way acquisition to construction at its own
pace, depending on complexity, external pressures and approvals, and funding. Some projects may
52

e started and completed in as little as two years; others will take ten years or longer. Projects may
no be started or completed in priority order; some may be started earlier to allow for a longer
timeline, and others may be completed earlier because progress moved ahead expeditiously.
The 2006 MTP gives first priority to transit improvements in major urban corridors. Since
the completion of the MTP 2025, three major transit projects have been completed – the new light
rail South Line to Meadowview, the extension of light rail East Line to Folsom, and the addition of
tracks to the Union Pacific main rail line across the Yolo Bypass and between Sacramento and
Roseville for both Capitol trains to the Bay Area and regional commuter rail. This 2006 MTP calls
for the following sequence of projects to expand the rail transit system, all needing additional
funding during the next five years:
1. Finish double-tracking all existing light rail lines for express service, starting construction
in 2007 and completing by 2009, with express service running by 2010, partly funded and
currently in environmental studies.
2. Extend the light rail South Line to the vicinity of Cosumnes River College/Calvine and
Auberry, with a completion by 2009, partly funded and currently in environmental studies.
3. Begin commuter rail service between Roseville/Auburn, downtown Sacramento, and
Davis/Dixon, with intent to lease train equipment scheduled no later than 2008, not yet
funded and currently undergoing feasibility studies.
4. Build the new light rail Downtown-Natomas-Airport (DNA) Line, starting construction in
2009 and complete by 2012-2015, partly funded and currently in environmental studies.
These transit projects are expected to need about $300 million in additional funding during the next
five years, with another $800 million in future years. The region will not be able to complete these
projects with regional funds alone, so the financial element of this plan assumes that additional
federal and local funding will be used to supplement them. In addition, during the next five years
the plan calls for 150 full-size and 150 van-size replacement bus coaches; 30 new full-size and 50
new van-size bus coaches; new Bus Rapid Transit services along Watt Avenue and Sunrise
Boulevard (in addition to the BRT along Stockton that has already started); 25 more light rail
vehicles; track, signal, and vehicle rehabilitation on the existing light rail system; a new
Sacramento bus maintenance yard; a new light rail maintenance facility; and assorted other transit
equipment and facilities such as bus stop improvements, technology upgrades, building
improvements, and park-and-ride lots.
The 2006 MTP also calls for work on 30 highway improvement projects in major regional
corridors, all needing additional funding during the next three to five years:
• Continue a series of traffic improvements, most importantly signal timing on county roads
and city streets in Sacramento, currently partly funded but ready for construction.
53

• Continue corridor studies to define a series of projects on high capacity suburban
connectors eventually running from I-5 via Elk Grove-Rancho Cordova-Roseville to Route
99 near Sacramento International Airport;
• Continue development of the new suburban connectors, by completing projects along Hazel
Avenue and Sierra College Boulevard by 2009, some funded and some not yet funded, and
then with further projects as defined in corridor studies (to include open space preservation),
for full completion by 2012-2016;
• Add carpool lanes on U.S. 50 between downtown Sacramento and Rancho Cordova, and
between El Dorado Hills and Shingle Springs, to be completed by 2010, partly funded and
currently in environmental studies;
• Extend carpool lanes on I-80 eastward through Roseville, to be completed by 2007,
substantially funded and currently in environmental studies;
• Install express signals for transit and other new technology equipment along Watt Avenue
and complete improvements at the Watt Avenue/U.S. 50 interchange and Folsom
Boulevard, to be completed by 2009, partly funded and currently in environmental studies.
• Improve access into downtown Sacramento via Northgate Boulevard/Route 160/Richards
Boulevard/Gateway Boulevard/7 th Street through the Union Pacific railyards, with a series
of projects to be completed by 2012, partly funded with some parts currently under
construction, others currently in engineering/design or environmental studies, and some not
yet ready to start.
• Build a new American River bridge in Folsom to replace the Folsom Dam Road, funded
with federal water and energy funds and expected to be built in 2007;
• Improve access and connections along U.S. 50 near Sacramento State University and Howe
Avenue/Power Inn Road, with a series of projects to be completed by 2010, partly funded
with some parts currently in environmental studies;
• Improve access and connections along U.S. 50 through West Sacramento, by completing
Harbor Boulevard interchange improvements by 2008 and road/bridge improvements
further south by 2010, partly funded with engineering, design, and right-of-way purchase
now underway;
• Add ramps at the I-5/Route 113 interchange in Woodland, to be completed in stages by
2015, partly funded and currently in environmental studies;
• Improve interchange access to Route 99 in Galt, at Sheldon Road, and at Riego Road, to I-5
at Cosumnes River Boulevard, to Route 70 at Algodon Road, and to U.S. 50 at Missouri
Flat Road, with projects to be completed by 2010, partly funded and currently in
environmental studies and engineering/design.
54

Depending on progress of environmental studies, these road projects may need $400-500 million in
additional funding during the next five years, with another $500-600 million in future years, but it
is likely that some will encounter project delivery delays not yet foreseen and fall behind schedule.
The region will not be able to complete these projects with regional funds alone, so the financial
element of this plan assumes additional federal, state, or local funding will be used to supplement
these projects. In addition, the 2006 MTP calls for continuing road and bridge rehabilitation work
and road improvements of a more local scale, around the region, slated for about $60 million from
regional funds but predominantly funded from local sources.
The 2006 MTP continues ongoing work to complete interregional state highway routes as
four-lane expressways in six areas. The plan calls for the following sequence of interregional
state highway projects, all except the first three needing additional funding during the next five
years.
• Complete the route 70 Expressway through southern Sutter County, complete by 2007, fully
funded for construction and currently in engineering/design;
• Complete the Route 65 Lincoln Bypass, starting construction in 2008 and complete by
2010, fully funded for construction and currently in engineering/design, with right-of-way
purchase starting in 2006;
• Complete the Route 99 Expressway south of Yuba City, to be complete except across the
Feather River by 2007, fully funded with some parts currently under construction and others
in engineering/design;
• Complete initial improvements to U.S. 50 at Placerville, by 2008, partly funded for
construction;
• Improve bridge access across the Feather River near Yuba City, complete by 2016 or
earlier, with feasibility studies underway to compare building a new bridge south of Yuba
City against replacing and widening the existing 5 th Street bridge between Yuba City and
Marysville;
• Improve Route 70 around or through Marysville and north to Butte County, complete by
2015, with feasibility studies of several options currently underway.
Depending on progress of environmental studies, these projects may need up to $50 million in
additional funding during the next five years, with another $200-400 million in future years, with a
major share (but not all) coming from the State. Caltrans also may make more localized
improvements on its state highways, and intends to continue with a series of projects to reconstruct
45-year-old I-80 through Placer County during the next five years.
Finally, this 2006 MTP calls for investments in community design, clean air programs, and
bicycle and pedestrian improvements, totaling $1.1 billion over 22 years. SACOG has started
implementation of these programs, and has attracted other funds, from sources such as local
55

edevelopment programs, private development partnerships, and environmental programs, to
broaden and extend community design and clean air programs.
The financial element of the 2006 MTP estimates the region will receive, on average, $125
million per year in federal funds during the upcoming five years -- enough to fund the
expected delivery of the projects described above. The region, however, through past
programming, committed a portion of its regional funds for 2006 and 2007 to other, localized
projects. To offset that, SACOG expects to seek and acquire additional federal discretionary funds
at a level commensurate with recent years, plus state funding shares for Caltrans interregional
highway projects. If the additional funding cannot be found, or project delivery brings forward
more projects ready for construction sooner than expected, the region anticipates financing plan
implementation by borrowing against future revenues (such as from the sales tax program in
Sacramento County).
Progress implementing this 2006 MTP during the next three to five years depends not only on
ability to program and fund projects and on air quality conformity, but also on project
delivery. In the last twenty years or more, most large complex projects have taken six to ten years
or longer for delivery, most often due to environmental approvals and community controversies,
and few have been delivered anywhere near as quickly as originally expected. About half of the
regional-scale projects scheduled during the next five years are currently in, or about to start,
environmental studies, where delivery delays are most often encountered. Where large projects are
held back during environmental studies, the amount of funding needed during the next five years
will be reduced. If many or most large projects move as noted above, the region intends to consider
financing its programs to advance funds and move forward with construction of projects that are
ready to go.
56

APPENDIX A
PUBLIC OUTREACH
A description of the extensive public outreach performed for the MTP 2025, including the
establishment of the Transportation Roundtable, is found in the MTP 2025 document called “A
Bold First Step” issued in 2002.
For the 2006 MTP and Addendum to the 2002 Environmental Impact Report, staff has developed
and followed the following Community Input Plan:
Purpose for Community Input Plan
This input plan concerns the adoption of a 2006 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (2006 MTP) and
its accompanying Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the MTP for
2025. These documents have been created to bridge the gap between the MTP 2025 and its EIR
(adopted in July 2002) and the adoption of the next regular 6-county MTP update in mid-2007,
which will have a new EIR. Since this is a technical update of an existing plan and EIR with
minimal content change, the purpose of the Community Input Plan is primarily to inform public
officials and agency staff of the need for the 2006 MTP and EIR Addendum and how they have
been prepared.
Audience
The audience for draft documents is primarily SACOG’s planning partners, although they will be
available for review by the general public as well.
Comment Period
The Draft 2006 MTP and EIR Addendum will be made available to SACOG committees and the
public for a period of 30 days of public comment. The Board of Directors will hold a public hearing
on the plan, the Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program (the MTIP, which is the
document that assigns funding to near-term projects), and the EIR Addendum. On the date of plan
adoption, the Board will receive the written public comments and staff responses, hold a second
public hearing, and adopt the final 2006 MTP, MTIP, EIR Addendum, and air quality conformity
finding.
Outreach Methods
The following methods will be used for eliciting comment on the draft documents:
SACOG Board of Directors
The Board will be mailed the draft 2006 MTP and EIR Addendum, along with a staff report,
in the agenda.
Posted Agendas
The agendas for SACOG’s Transportation and Air Quality Committee and Board of
Directors meetings, where these draft documents are considered, will be posted at the
SACOG offices and on the SACOG webpage. E-mail notifications of committee and Board
agendas are now available upon request.
57

ADA Requirements
All ADA requirements will be met in this process.
Public Hearings
There will be a public hearing on the documents held by the Board of Directors. The
meeting will be at the SACOG offices, 1415 L Street, 3 rd Floor, Sacramento, CA 95814. A
second hearing will be held just before the adoption of the MTP, EIR Addendum, MTIP,
and air quality conformity finding, in the same location and at the same time.
Outreach to Native American Tribes
Notification of the availability of the documents will be sent via e-mail to the four Tribal
governments that own land in the SACOG region. .
SACOG Webpage
The documents and the opportunity to comment on them will be highlighted on the
homepage at www.sacog.org.
Legal Notices
A legal notice regarding the documents, the comment period, and the public hearings will
be placed in the Sacramento Bee. This will appear at least 15 days before the public
hearings.
SACOG Advisory Committee Mailing List
An e-mail regarding the availability for comment of the documents will be sent to members
of the:
Regional Planning Partnership, which includes all of SACOG’s public agency
partners
Public Works Coordinating Group
Transit Coordinating Committee
Sacramento Region ITS Partnership
Transportation Demand Management Task Force
Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee
Response to Public Input
SACOG staff will respond to comments on the documents through letters to individual commenters
or through a consolidated feedback report that will be made at the second Board hearing.
Final Documents
Final documents will be distributed to affected agencies (including tribal governments) and those
individuals and organizations that provided comments during the public input process. Members of
the public will be able to obtain copies of the final documents from SACOG as well, and they will
be available on the SACOG website, and in the SACOG library.
58

APPENDIX B
THE COMMUNITY DESIGN FUNDING PROGRAM
(This is an excerpt from The Community Design Funding Program Guidelines that were adopted by
the SACOG Board of Directors in September 2005. It omits the appendices and the application).
This document contains information regarding the Sacramento Area Council of Government’s
Community Design Program for 2005-07. The program provides grants to local government
agencies and their partners to promote plans and physical development that supports SACOG’s
Blueprint Project. Grants are awarded every two years.
A. INTRODUCTION
Four Funding Programs
In July 2002, the Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) adopted the Metropolitan
Transportation Plan for 2025 (the MTP for 2025). This 23-year, $22 billion plan for the region
included four federally-funded programs to be used for regional transportation and related priorities
that implement the goals of the Plan (Appendix A). The four programs, with 23-year funding
amounts are:
• Air Quality Funding Program $180 million
• Bicycle and Pedestrian Funding Program $350 million
• Transportation Demand Management $ 44 million
• Community Design Funding Program $500 million
When the MTP for 2025 was adopted, it was the intent of SACOG to continue these four regional
funding programs into the foreseeable future in each successive MTP. Since the adoption of the
MTP for 2025, SACOG has adopted several other MTPs, and the funding programs have been
continued. Currently, the MTP 2027 is the plan that is operable in the SACOG Region.
The guidelines found in Section 2 of this document pertain only to the Community Design Funding
Program. The other three programs each have a separate set of guidelines that are consistent with
these, and the intent is to coordinate the selection of projects in all four programs with one advisory
committee, called the Grant Programs Overview Committee. That committee will review the grant
award recommendations by each program’s Working Group, and review for regional balance,
project type balance and overall direction. For each program, a joint recommendation for funding
presented to the SACOG Board of Directors.
Public agencies will periodically be given the opportunity to apply for programs on a schedule that
will be published before each funding round. The timing of funding rounds is dependent on the
availability of the federal funding, and can’t always be predicted far in advance.
SACOG is committed to using this funding for projects and programs in all parts of the region. For
the Community Design Funding Program, a fair and equitable share of the funding for these
59

programs combined with other SACOG-controlled regional funds, will be the goal for each public
jurisdiction over the long term.
Environmental Justice
SACOG is also committed to following federal guidance on environmental justice. The goal of
environmental justice to ensure that when transportation decisions are made, low-income and
minority communities have a full opportunity to participate in the decision-making, and that they
receive an equitable distribution of benefits and not a disproportionate share of burdens. Each
project or service seeking funds from SACOG's regional funding programs will be evaluated for
environmental justice. The grant application process may include explicit questions on
environmental justice for project applicants to answer.
B. FOUR SACOG FUNDING PROGRAMS
Financial support for these programs will come primarily from Federal funding sources expected to
be available to the region. The SACOG Board of Directors will approve the amounts allocated to
each program before the start of the project selection process, according to long-term Metropolitan
Transportation Plan and the agency’s more immediate priorities.
Most of the projects selected for these programs must qualify for the three federal funding sources
available to SACOG. 9 In most cases, a local funding match requirement of 11.47% of the total
project cost applies. Federal funding requirements from the TEA-21 are found in Appendix C, and
the recently-approved reauthorization is expected to use the same or similar requirements. When
SACOG is able to obtain other sources of funding for the programs, different requirements may
apply. In most cases, the minimum project size SACOG will consider is $150,000; the Community
Design Funding Program will fund planning-related projects for a minimum of $100,000.
C. GENERAL APPLICATION PROCESS
Every grant cycle, SACOG will issue a request for applications when federal funding opportunities
arise, typically once every two years. Public agencies (cities, counties, and other public agencies)
are the eligible applicants for these federal funds. Each time funds are made available, the request
for applications will be made through SACOG’s newsletter, webpage, advisory committee
meetings, and letters to public works and planning departments, transportation agencies, transit
agencies, transportation management associations, and other organizations.
Section 3 of this document serves as the Request for Applications for the Community Design
Funding Program for 2005-07. Specific details and requirements for applying for grants are found
in that section.
9 These sources are currently the Surface Transportation Program (STP), the Congestion Management and Air Quality
Program (CMAQ), and Transportation Enhancements (TE).
60

D. PROJECT SELECTION PROCESS: Sacramento, Sutter, Yolo and Yuba Counties
Applications Community Design grants in Sacramento and Yolo Counties must be endorsed by the
countywide transportation agency in those counties. Because there are no countywide
transportation agencies in Yuba and Sutter Counties, this step is not necessary. The Community
Design Working Group and the Grant Programs Overview Committee, formed with members from
existing SACOG committees and staffed by SACOG, will make recommendations to the Board of
Directors, through the appropriate Board Committee, on project selection. After SACOG staff
screen project applications for eligibility, Working Group and Grant Overview Committee
members will be responsible for reading proposals and making recommendations for projects to be
funded. The process and the membership of these committees are described in Section 2.
SACOG reserves the right to fund less than the amount reserved for each funding program in a
given funding cycle, as well as to fund projects in a program other than the one for which it was
submitted.
E. PROJECT SELECTION PROCESS: Placer and El Dorado Counties
For Placer and El Dorado Counties, a different situation applies, due to Memoranda of
Understanding between the Placer County Transportation Planning Agency and SACOG and the El
Dorado Transportation Commission and SACOG that govern the use of federal funds in those
counties. Please refer to Section 2 for summary description or Appendix B for a detailed
explanation of how federally-funded projects are approved in those counties.
F. GENERAL AWARD REQUIREMENTS
After SACOG has made an award through any of the four funding programs, project sponsors will
be asked to follow or be aware of these requirements:
• Follow all federal funding requirements listed in Appendix C.
• Agree to the terms of the draft Letter of Understanding shown in Appendix E
• Follow all federal environmental justice directives.
• Assure SACOG that the projects meet the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities
Act.
• Follow SACOG’s “Use It or Lose It” policy for obligating and spending the grant funds.
The policy requires project sponsors to schedule fund obligation and project implementation
in the Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program and to honor that schedule.
• A local non-federal match of at least 11.47% of the total cost of a project is required for
projects receiving federal funding in the Sacramento region, with a few exceptions that are
61

detailed under the individual program guidelines. This does not include “in kind” match,
but must be funding that is dedicated to eligible features within the project and included in
its overall cost.
• For capital projects, federal funds may be used for Preliminary Engineering (which includes
environmental work and design) as well as for right-of-way and construction. When a
project is ready for implementation, the project sponsor requests an authorization from
Caltrans. When the project is authorized, the sponsor can incur expenses that will then be
reimbursed from the grant. A project sponsor submits invoices for the entire cost incurred,
and will be reimbursed at 88.53% (the total cost minus local match).
SACOG encourages project sponsors to seek other sources of funding that may be available,
including Community Development Block Grants or other federal HUD funds (although for the
most part, federal funds from other programs cannot be used as match).
G. PROGRAM BACKGROUND
The overall purpose of the Community Design Program is to provide support for planning and
capital development projects that promote the Blueprint Project Principles.
The Community Design Program supports implementation of the Blueprint Project with financial
incentives to local governments. Grants are awarded to projects sponsored by qualified public
agencies in the SACOG region. These projects must support specific development or planning
projects that conform to the seven Blueprint Principles (which are discussed in detail on the
SACOG website: www.sacog.org/regionalfunding/betterways.pdf ):
• transportation choices;
• housing diversity;
• compact development;
• mixed land uses;
• use of existing assets;
• natural resource protection; and
• quality design.
The Metropolitan Transportation Plan for 2025 authorized the program through 2025. The MTP
included $500 million dedicated to directly fund public agencies (possibly in partnership with
private developers and community organizations) for projects that support the goals of the Plan.
The intent of the Community Design Program is to use regional transportation funding to promote
the construction of land use developments (or land use and projects) that lead to fewer vehicles
miles traveled and more walking, biking, and transit usage. The program results from the
recognition that land use influences travel behavior and can be a powerful tool to improve the
efficiency and effectiveness of the regional transportation system. If it is convenient for people to
travel to common destinations by walking, biking, or public transit, we can reap air quality and
congestion-relief benefits at the local and regional scale. Near-term goals and objectives for the
program are expanded upon below. Community Design proposals, which must be submitted by
public agencies, will be evaluated for how well they promote the Blueprint Principles and the level
62

of project maturity and commitment to actual physical construction.
H. BLUEPRINT PROJECT
The six-county Sacramento metropolitan area presently faces a golden opportunity to promote
construction of projects that will lead to more livable communities. The convergence of rapid
growth, market conditions and new-found attitude towards regionalism offers the opportunity to
reverse the trend of urban sprawl that communities in the Sacramento region – and all across
America – have allowed. The timing is right since this region is projected to approximately double
its population to 3.8 million by 2050.
SACOG’s Blueprint Project has laid the groundwork for a better managed, more compact urban
form. The project started in the year 2000 when SACOG was developing the Metropolitan
Transportation Plan (MTP) for 2025. The modeling for the MTP showed that despite spending an
estimated $23 billion through the year 2025 for transportation projects throughout the six-county
region, the Sacramento metropolitan area vehicular congestion would increase by 50% and vehicle
miles traveled per household would increase by 20%. In addition, based on the sprawl-like
development patterns of the late 1990s, the region would urbanize 661 additional square miles by
2050 under the base case scenario. With the region expecting to add more than 1 million jobs,
840,000 new dwelling units will need to be created to house the related doubling of the population
to 3.8 million.
The Blueprint Project has given this region a long-range vision for land use to better manage the
growth pressures of this region. The Blueprint Project has been on the cutting edge of regional
growth management in four areas: (1) innovative use of geographic information system software,
(2) extensive community outreach, (3) broad-based participatory techniques and (4) on-the-ground
economic reality checks. Using interactive computer software, the average citizen can see the
relationship between transportation performance and land use patterns, and what impacts land use
has on quality of life indicators. More than 5,000 area residents have participated in 37 Blueprint
half or full-day public workshops. After developing different growth pattern scenarios at
neighborhood, county and regional levels and being able to compare development results, 99% of
all participants have concluded that implementation of the seven Blueprint Principles are needed if
this region is going to maintain its livability, protect open space and agriculture lands, provide
housing that is attainable to all economic segments, and manage transportation impacts. Public
opinion polling commissioned by SACOG yields similar public sentiments.
As a result, the SACOG Board of Directors adopted a Blueprint Project Preferred Scenario in
December, 2004. The Preferred Scenario serves only as a concept-level illustration of the growth
principles. It was developed with parcel-level data and analysis to help ensure that the growth
concepts were being applied in a realistic manner; however, the Preferred Scenario is not for literal,
parcel-level interpretation.
SACOG is working with local jurisdictions to implement the concepts of the Preferred Scenario.
The Community Design Funding Program is designed for the planning and construction of projects
that meet the Blueprint Principles.
63

I. PROGRAM GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
The Community Design Funding Program’s stated goals and objectives are:
Goals
The Community Design Funding Program is a transportation funding program that provides a
means to:
A. encourage patterns of land development in new areas, following Blueprint Principles, that foster
walking, biking and use of public transit instead of driving.
B. improve walkability, bikability, and transit use in existing communities where there is the
potential for infill and redevelopment that follows the Principles.
C. improve a community’s sense of identity and place as well as its quality of life through
integrated transportation and land use development or redevelopment projects.
Near-term program objectives
The following near-term objectives pertain to the next two years of the program, fiscal years 2005-
06 and 2006-07.
1. Provide transportation infrastructure for specific land development projects that conform to the
Blueprint Principles.
2. Provide transportation infrastructure for areas with a plan or policies adopted by a policy board
that conform to the Principles.
3. Provide transportation infrastructure for developed areas where the built environment already
conforms to the Principles, but where key features such as sidewalks and bike lanes are
missing.
4. Provide planning assistance to modify plans and development projects to follow the Principles.
5. Provide incentives for new land development or redevelopment proposals that, if it were not for
the Community Design Program, would be built according to standard development practices or
not built at all.
6. Provide leverage for other public and private funding or enhance another transportation project.
7. Provide prototype examples of Community Design Principles throughout the region in different
land use settings, including urban, suburban, and rural.
64

Future program objectives
SACOG envisions a broader array of objectives in future funding rounds, including public
education on the strong link between land use and transportation, a housing incentive program, and
an infrastructure bank loan program.
J. PROGRAM FUNDING AND GRANT TYPES
In fiscal years 2005-06 and 2006-07, SACOG staff has preliminarily recommended that $12 million
be funded for Community Design Grants. This figure may change depending the quality of the
grant applications. Ultimately, the SACOG Board of Directors will make the determination on the
final program amount for 2005-07 after it reviews the award recommendations. Please note that the
staff’s recommended figure is for only for grants within Sacramento, Sutter, Yolo and Yuba
Counties; funding for El Dorado and Placer County projects will be according to their respective
agreements with SACOG, as summarized in sub-section L and detailed in Appendix B.
There are three types of grants within the Community Design Funding Program for 2005-07, of
which the first two may be applied for through the Request for Applications in Section 3.
• Capital grants are available to public agencies (with or without private or non-profit partners)
for transportation infrastructure projects. These infrastructure projects must either (1) connect
directly to a site, corridor, or neighborhood development or redevelopment project that
incorporates Blueprint Principles, or (2) supports a land use plan for development or
redevelopment that incorporates the Principles, or (3) support an existing community that
conforms to the Principles but lacks transportation infrastructure for alternative modes.
• Planning grants are available to local governments for updating local general plans, specific
plans, other kinds of relevant plans, zoning ordinances, or other guidance documents to
incorporate the Principles.
• Quick Response Planning Grants will be available starting in 2006 to local government
agencies seeking planning assistance to improve specific development projects to conform to
the Blueprint Principles. SACOG will select a limited number of pre-qualified planners,
architects and other consultants through an RFQ process to provide on-going assistance that
will be used to significantly improve specific development or redevelopment projects through
incorporation of the Principles. Local governments will apply for technical assistance, and
SACOG staff will make a determination whether to provide the assistance through consultant
services. Projects may be submitted on an on-going basis throughout the 2005-07 fiscal years
once the program has commenced. SACOG staff will review applications about every two
months. This program will be available in 2006 and SACOG will issue a separate request for
applications.
65

K. PROJECT SPONSORSHIP
Public agencies, 10 either with or without partnership with land developers or community groups,
are eligible to sponsor Community Design projects. Public/private collaborations are encouraged,
and all proposals will be expected to include a community outreach component. Community
groups and developers who may wish to apply for these funds with a public agency are strongly
encouraged to contact the agency early in the application process for its support and coordination.
Non-city/county qualified public agencies that choose to serve as the lead sponsor are also strongly
recommended to seek support from the local government in which the project site is located,
preferably with coordination early in the application process. Lack of documented support or
coordination will leave the impression that the project is not endorsed by the SACOG member
agency and would considerably weaken the project’s chances for program funding.
Also please note that if the awarded government agency intends to hire consulting or construction
services with the grant funds, public bidding laws will take affect regarding the selection of
contractors.
L. PLACER AND EL DORADO COUNTIES
For Placer and El Dorado Counties, a different situation applies, due to Memoranda of
Understanding between the Placer County Transportation Planning Agency and SACOG and the El
Dorado Transportation Commission and SACOG that govern the use of federal funds in those
counties. Please refer to Appendix B for a detailed explanation of how federally-funded projects
are approved in those counties.
In summary, the Regional Transportation Planning Agencies (RTPA) for Placer and El Dorado
Counties each hold a written agreement with SACOG that allows them to select projects with a fair
share of federal funds. Local governments in these two counties will submit their grant
applications to their RTPA. The RTPA will forward its selected projects to SACOG for funding.
SACOG staff will review these projects and make a determination if they are qualified for the
Community Design Funding Program, and, if so, they will be designated as receiving funding
through this program and will be recognized as such. If not, they will be funded without being so
designated.
M. ELIGIBLE PROJECTS
All projects awarded through the Community Design Funding Program must conform to federal
transportation funding requirements. Potential applicants are encouraged to directly contact the
SACOG Program Manager listed in sub-section P early in the application process for eligibility
review. Summary descriptions of projects that received Community Design Funding Program
funding in 2003-05 may be viewed in Appendix D. In addition, SACOG will provide a letter of
understanding to the award recipient regarding SACOG’s requirements and expectations regarding
10 Public agencies are those organizations qualified to enter into a Cooperative Agreement with the
California Department of Transportation to receive and use Federal transportation funds.
66

the grant. The draft model letter is found in Appendix E.
The following lists show the broad range of possible projects that are likely to be eligible for
Community Design Funding Program funding:
Capital Grants
• infrastructure directly connected to a land development project, land use plan, or in an
existing “Blueprint friendly” community
• Bicycle and pedestrian paths, tunnels, and bridges
• On-street bike lanes
• Pedestrian plazas
• Pedestrian street crossings
• Streetscaping such as median landscaping, street trees, lighting, and furniture
• Traffic calming (but not interfering with public transit, bicycling or walking)
• Transit buses and services that serve the site (operations limited to 3 years)
• Transit stop amenities such as shelters, restrooms, and benches
• Transit transfer centers
• Shared parking systems and parking garages
• Electric vehicle charging stations and other support infrastructure 11
• Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) associated with the site, such as smart parking or
public Transit real-time information signs
• Outreach to the neighborhood and stakeholders
Planning
Updates to general plans, specific plans, transportation plans, zoning codes, or other planning
guidance, to conform them to the Blueprint Principles.
N. PROJECT SELECTION PROCESS
Two committees will review and recommend grant applications for awards before they are
submitted to the SACOG Board of Directors for review and action. The first committee, the
Community Design Working Group, will review each application in detail. It will meet four times
over a one month period to make recommendations awards and amounts purely on the basis of the
technical merit of each project as described on the next sub-section.
This second committee, the Grant Programs Overview Committee, will review recommended
applications from the Working Group for regional balance and relative equity amongst the different
communities in the region relative to the strength of their applications. The Committee will also
review recommended projects within the context of SACOG’s other three funding programs: Air
Quality, Transportation Demand Management and Bicycle/Pedestrian. This committee will meet
no more than two times specifically for the Community Design Program. (It will also meet to
11 Electric vehicles themselves, which are privately owned, may not be paid for with Federal funds.
67

eview the recommendations from the other three SACOG grant programs – Air Quality,
Bicycle/Pedestrian and Transportation Demand Management.)
If the recommendations from both committees are the same, then they will be forwarded to the
SACOG Board for review and action. If there are differences between the two committees’
recommendations, SACOG staff will try to rectify any differences and submit a compromised set of
recommendations based in the spirit of the discussions by the two committees to the Board.
Members for both of these committees will be selected from the Regional Planning Partnership, the
Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee, the Transit Coordinating Committee, the
Transportation Demand Management Task Force and the Planners Committee as shown below:
Community Design Working Group
Expertise Appointment By: Working Group Positions
Planners Planners Committee 5
Project Engineers Regional Planning Partnership 3
Urban Designer Regional Planning Partnership 1
Bike/Ped Bike/Ped Advisory Committee 1
Air Quality Air Districts 1
TDM TDM Task Force 1
Transit Transit Coordinating Committee 2
Community Groups Regional Planning Partnership 1
TOTAL 15
Grant Programs Overview Committee
Appointment By:
Number of Positions
Planners Committee 3
Regional Planning Partnership 4
Bike/Pedestrian Advisory Committee 2
TDM Task Force 2
Transit Coordinating Committee 2
Air Districts 2
TOTAL 15
O. EVALUATION CRITERIA
The evaluation criteria described in this subsection are based on the Working Group discussions
from the selection process of the 2003-05 Community Design Grant Program. Essentially, the
Working Group narrowed several stated criteria down to the overall impression each application
made on two characteristics. These two characteristics will serve as the evaluation criteria for this
cycle’s selection process. They are not formally written agreed-upon language, but rather
summarize the practical implications that will be considered.
68

Criterion #1: How well does the proposed project promote the Blueprint Project Principles?
Practical considerations: This is the most fundamental question each project will be judged against.
Based on the 2003-05 selection of projects, the Working Group identified projects that best
exemplified the Blueprint Principles. Projects that failed to make a compelling argument that they
support the principles were immediately eliminated from further consideration. Some applicants
tried to rationalize how a public project that was in high demand was therefore a Blueprint-friendly
project, when it was not. Projects that were considered not detrimental to the Blueprint Project did
not necessarily mean that they were considered Blueprint friendly. This program is intended to
support the region’s best examples of Blueprint implementation and not necessarily to provide a
funding source for public works projects.
Applicants seeking to understand how competitive their projects might be, may wish to compare
their idea against the 15 projects that were funded in 2003-05. These applications may also give
prospective applicants an idea of what application contents were successfully used. The .PDF files
of grant applications of each of those projects may be found at
www.sacog.org/regionalfunding/awarded_grant_applications.cfm
The single most common concern the Working Group had in reviewing applications was that the
lack of clarity. Some applications lacked why their project was Blueprint-supportive, while others
tried unsuccessfully to rationalize why a project followed the Blueprint principles. Some applicants
also lacked a clear explanation of why the project was needed to support Blueprint. Other
applicants failed to clearly describe how they would use the grant funding in a way that would lead
to Blueprint-friendly development.
Criterion #2: How “real” is the project? What is the likelihood that the project will be
implemented as the application implies?
Of the applications that showed a strong tie with the Blueprint Principles, the Working Group spent
a considerable amount of time deliberating about how realistic these proposals were. Successful
applicants were able to provide evidence that the project had been well-thought through and that
the project was likely be implemented immediately.
Commonly asked questions by the Working Group used to evaluate applications were:
• Has the governing body with the most legal standing endorsed or approved this
project?
• Is there an existing adopted plan in which this project is identified?
• Has the surrounding neighborhood been involved in the project’s development
and has the affected neighborhood or the appropriate neighborhood association
endorsed the grant project?
• Is there support from adjacent and nearby property owners who is proposing
development on their property?
• For capital projects, where is this project in the development review process?
• For planning projects, what is the project’s potential to meet the Blueprint
Principles in the plans, zoning ordinances or other development guidance?
69

• Are there leveraged, private development funds being invested in or near the
subject area? If so, how much, and is the private development considered
Blueprint-friendly?
• What documentation is there on how much funding has been invested in the
study area? Are there letters or other documentation from property owners in
the application stating support for the project or stating what they are intending
to do with their property that is Blueprint-friendly?
• Is this a “lynchpin” project –does its implementation and success mean other
Blueprint-supportive projects will also be built? If this project is not funded,
will other Blueprint-supportive projects not be built as a result?
• Has the project been carefully thought-through, or are there significant obstacles
that the applicant has not addressed in the application?
• Does this project serve as a good example of the Blueprint Principles for the
region?
• What is the likelihood that this project will be built as it is described in the
application? And how soon will it get built or implemented?
• Are there major outstanding issues that are not resolved? Does this project need
to be awarded in this funding cycle, or can it wait until future cycles after the
applicant has addressed all critical issues?
• What are the number of units of housing, commercial space, jobs and other
important indicators within a quarter mile of this site? Within one mile? How
do residential densities compare with other comparable subject areas?
• How did the project perform using PLACE 3 S or in comparison with the Desired
Land Development Profiles Matrix?
• What is the track record of the applicant in Blueprint implementation?
• (Expected questions in 2005-07): What is the track record of the jurisdiction if it
received a Community Design Grant in 2003-05? Has the applicant been
accountable to SACOG for how it has utilized its grant? Has the project been
implemented in the spirit it was stated in the grant application?
Practical Considerations: Applications that adequately addressed the issues raised in these
questions were more likely to have been successful in 2003-05, and this will likely hold true for the
2005-07 funding cycle as well. Some of the tools that successful applicants included in their
applications included:
• A context map of the site: where is the subject area in relation to the commonly
known landmarks within the region.
• An aerial map showing the project or subject area. The maps showed what exist
currently, what projects are in place, and how and where grant funds were going to
be used.
• A list of major capital improvements within, adjacent to, or near the subject site.
This list could show infrastructure improvements, private development investment
made or committed, and long-term public works projects likely to be built
according to an adopted plan.
• PLACE 3 S maps and analysis showing different land use configurations, and the
preferred scenario on that conforms well with the Blueprint Principles.
70

• Photographs of the site or subject area as they currently exist.
• Renderings or drawings of what the subject site or area will look like as a result of
grant funding.
• Renderings, graphics or photographs of projects that have recently been built or are
going through development review for construction in or near the project subject
area.
• Letters of support from key organizations (neighborhood association, adjacent
property owners, private developers directly affected by the subject project).
Written information that addresses as many of the questions mentioned above. The level of detail
that is provided should be enough to provide the Working Group a clear, overall picture of what
activities, investments, etc. are taking place without providing extraneous information.
DESCRIPTIONS OF AWARDED
2003-05 COMMUNITY DESIGN APPLICATION PROJECTS
This appendix briefly describes grant applications that were funded in the 2003-05 Community
Design Grant Program. The awarded grant applications may be viewed in their entirety at
http://www.sacog.org/regionalfunding/communitydesign.cfm
Awarded 2003-05 Capital Projects
Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency: Broadway/Martin Luther King, Jr. Intersection
Enhancement Project ($600,930 grant, total project $685,000). The project proposes to improve
safety for pedestrians and bicyclists on Broadway at Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard. The
project would replace the existing deteriorated curb, gutter, and sidewalks, construct high-visibility
crosswalks, provide accessible ramps, replace signal heads and lenses, provide countdown signals
for pedestrians, and design and implement feasible improvements to reduce vehicular speed. The
Agency is currently taking bids on a mixed-use development at this intersection.
City of Sacramento/Sacramento Regional Transit/Capitol Area Development Authority: 13 th and
16 th Street Light Rail Station Connectivity Improvements ($1,683,000 grant, total project
$2,420,000). The proposed project will provide critical safety and accessibility improvements to
the 13 th and 16 th Street Light Rail Station and environs in the central business district. 16 th Street is
now the main transfer station for light rail service in the region – yet there are no pedestrian
improvements, signage or amenities to support increased ridership and connect the station with
high-density employment centers and new mixed-use housing projects planned for the Capitol
Area. Similarly, the 13 th Street Station serves the R Street redevelopment area but is not accessible
to new mixed-use developments on R Street.
City of Rancho Cordova: Cordova City Center ($1,691,910 grant, total project $2,190,621). As
part of a new Transit Oriented District, two components -- 1. Folsom Boulevard and Plaza
Improvements: replace the street frontage along the Folsom Boulevard, and La Loma Drive
including a café sidewalk, added on-street parallel parking inset between street trees. The project
includes a decorative plaza with a central fountain that connects the residential townhouses to the
commercial uses and the Mather Field/Mills Station across the street, and 2. Public Parking
71

Structure: Build a two-level parking structure for approximately 200 auto spaces to be used for
shared parking within a new high-density residential and commercial district directly across the
street from the station. The parking structure will be used for residents, mixed commercial uses
and light-rail riders and is a critical component for creating the necessary density and that will
boost light-rail ridership. Funds will cover 75% of the parking structure construction, meaning 151
of the 201 parking spaces.
City of Yuba City: Cinema 14 and Mixed-Use Retail Complex Transportation Improvements,
($613,800 grant, total project $700,000). The Yuba City Downtown Cinema 14 and Mixed-Use
Retail Complex is a proposed mixed-use development for the six-acre parcel bordered by Bridge
Street on the north, Shasta Street on the west, Boyd Street on the east, and B Street on the south.
The Redevelopment Agency purchased the site to redevelop as part of the Downtown
Revitalization Strategy. The project will include a 14-screen movie theater anchor with
approximately 12,000 square feet of retail space adjacent to the cinema, and 500 parking spaces to
the rear of the cinema and 33 in front. It is intended that the parking lot will remain publicly owned
and serve both theater goers and shoppers, and that people drawn to the entertainment complex will
be able to access the restaurants, stores, cultural attractions, and businesses in the Plumas Main
Street District through a series of multi-modal facilities and connections. The transportation
improvements include signal phasing modifications, pedestrian-scale street lighting, sidewalks, restriping
for intersection pedestrian crossings and safety, and minor roadway rehabilitation. These
improvements will enhance walkability near the cinema and mixed-use complex by improving
safety, accessibility, connectivity and circulation.
City of Marysville: Downtown Marysville Renaissance Square ($1,980,000 grant, total project
$8,500,000). This is a mixed-use project incorporating the reuse and renovation of the historic
Marysville Hotel to infill housing units, pedestrian-oriented retail uses, and adjacent structured
parking to serve residents and customers of the project, tenants and employees at the Hart Office
Building and customers of the D Street commercial core area. The grant funding would be used for
the parking structure element.
County of Sacramento: Freedom Park Drive ($1,089,000 grant, total project $1,500,000).
Construct pedestrian and streetscape improvements along Freedom Park Drive between 32 nd to 34 th
Street and 34 th Street to Watt Avenue, to support infill development and redevelopment activities
that will create a mixed-use “Main Street” corridor in North Highlands.
City of West Sacramento: Tower Bridge Gateway/Garden Street Intersection ($2,970,000 grant,
total project $5,000,000). Construction of at-grade 4-way intersection replacing an existing
flyover. Intersection will provide pedestrian, bicycle and direct vehicle access, connecting with
planned Transit Center and transit lines. Smart growth development projects are being
permitted/planned in the immediate area.
City of Roseville: Historic District Revitalization Project ($630,630 grant, total project $5.6
million). Streetscaping, pedestrian street crossings, outreach to neighborhood and stakeholders,
and design/engineering for the Roseville Multi-modal Center Expansion. The project helps to
revitalize Roseville’s original commercial district, with period buildings from the late 1800s to the
72

early 1900’s. The project area includes Main, Church, Pacific and Lincoln Streets east of
Washington Boulevard and west of the railroad tracks.
City of Roseville: Riverside Avenue Revitalization Project ($247,500 grant, total project $6
million). Streetscaping and pedestrian street crossings to support the revitalization of this corridor
between Douglas Boulevard and Darling Way.
Placer County, Highway 49 Streetscape Project ($100,000 grant; $647,854 total project)
This project is one of the recommended actions from the North Auburn Community Development
Strategy for the redevelopment of Highway 49 corridor in unincorporated Placer County. The
streetscape project consists of planting of trees, shrubs and groundcover in five new landscaped
medians.
Awarded 2003-05 Planning Projects
City of Sacramento/Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency, Sacramento Regional
Transit: Swanston Station Transit Village Planning ($222,750 grant, total project $665,000). This
project includes a Transit Village (TOD) Plan and supportive traffic study, urban design plan, and
transportation-related infrastructure plan.
Downtown Development Group/City of Sacramento: The Docks Area Redevelopment Project
($377,190 grant, total project $680,000). This project includes a specific plan and the related
environmental review as well as the infrastructure assessment and financing plan for the Docks
Area Redevelopment Project.
Yolo County: Growing Space: Updating the Yolo County General Plan to Support Smart Growth in
Rural Communities ($218,790 grant, total project $772,086). Yolo County proposes to reinforce
existing policies and integrate new smart growth principles into the Circulation and Land Use
elements of the General Plan, with particular emphasis on the unique challenges of creating higher
density mixed-use development within pedestrian- and bicycle-oriented neighborhoods in rural
small towns. Through this process, Yolo County intends to reduce future vehicle demand and
protect valuable agricultural and habitat resources.
City of Folsom: Glenn Drive Light Rail Station (LRT) Transit Oriented Development (TOD)
Master Plan ($144,540 grant, total project $165,000). The Folsom Light Rail Extension Project is
currently under construction in the City of Folsom, with approved stations -- Iron Point, Historic
Folsom, and Glenn Drive (previously known as Silverbrook). The Glenn Drive LRT station will
include a park-and-ride lot. It is planned on a 2.9 acre site with 184 parking spaces. Since this
design was completed, the site has been considered for transit oriented development (TOD) by both
Sacramento Regional Transit District (RT) and the City of Folsom. The City and RT support
changes to the station parking lot to be TOD-friendly in the future. This grant will be used to
complete strategic planning for the TOD with the goal of implementation at the conclusion of the
study, including the development of a conceptual master plan integrating the various transportation
and development linkages necessary to support TOD development, and a
marketing/implementation plan for coordination activities, public outreach activities, partnering
opportunities, and financial incentives important to development of a TOD.
73

County of Sacramento with numerous public and private partners, Hurley Way Revitalization,
Phase I ($139,590 grant for Phase I, total Phase I cost $160,000). The project is a revitalization of a
2-mile portion of Hurley Way, bounded by Watt Avenue to the East and Ethan Way and American
River Parkway to the West. Phase I includes roadway analysis, design and planning and initiation
of an infill development project. Additional phases will install the capital improvements. A public
outreach component would be an integral element of Phase I.
74

APPENDIX C
INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS STRATEGIES
Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) encompass information and communications technologies
that are increasingly being used by traffic and transit managers to improve the operating efficiency
of their systems. In an era of funding and environmental constraints for roadway expansion, ITS
have been embraced as a means to deal with the increased demands on the region's transportation
system resulting from strong population and business growth. ITS are the technologies that will
enable a fully integrated, multi-modal transportation system that gives operators the ability to
enhance and integrate transit services, smooth traffic flow, improve safety, enhance emergency
services, and provide traveler information.
The Federal Highway Administration places greater emphasis on the deployment of ITS as an
integrated system linking multiple jurisdictions. This approach will enable the sharing of traffic and
transit data, as well as systems operations where applicable. As part of the requirements for ITS
deployment, an Architecture depicting how agencies are interconnected is needed. As well, ITS
must be mainstreamed into the planning and funding process via the MTP.
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES
The Sacramento region is making good progress in planning for the deployment of ITS. In addition
to the deployment project listed below, two important studies will help prioritize and set the stage
for future projects that will be included in subsequent updates of the MTP. Those studies include:
• A Strategic Deployment Plan (SDP) has recently been completed that identifies ITS
technologies and projects to meet regional goals and objectives. This study prioritizes
project selection and funding to meet those objectives. The SDP replaces a deployment
plan crafted in 1996, which has become obsolete as technologies and regional priorities
have evolved.
• A Systems Engineering study to begin in January 2006 will develop a regional ITS
communication system that links traffic and transit operations centers in the region. In early
1999, a conceptual report on the Sacramento Transportation Area-wide Network
(STARNET) was completed. A Needs Assessment study completed in late 2001, identified
system improvements needed at each operation center in order link them via STARNET.
Systems Engineering will identify system needs and operational specifics to implement
STARNET.
ITS PROJECTS IN THE 2006 MTP
SACRAMENTO COUNTY PROJECTS
SAC22890 ITS on Arden Way
Smart Corridor on Arden Way from Del Paso to Watt Ave.
75

SAC24071 Elk Grove ITS Phase 1
Implementation of Phase 1 of Elk Grove's ITS, including development of a Traffic Management
Center at the City Corporation Yard and associated communication infrastructure, along with signal
controller replacement and signal interconnect installation in the southwest quadrant of the City.
REGIONWIDE PROJECTS
VAR11000 Regionwide STARNET Integration
In SACOG region, implement regionwide STARNET integration and related ITS projects.
76

APPENDIX D
DEMOGRAPHIC/LAND USE, MODELING,
AND FINANCIAL ASSUMPTIONS
DEMOGRAPHIC PROJECTIONS AND LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS USED IN THE MTP
2025 AND THE 2006 MTP
SACOG used population, housing and employment projections through the year 2027 in the travel
demand forecasts made for the 2006 MTP. These projections are adapted from the 2025 projections
made for the previous update of the MTP. The major assumption behind the 2025 projections is
that adopted general and specific plans from area jurisdictions provide an accurate depiction of
future growth 12 . In these plans residential land is almost completely consumed by 2025. The supply
of commercial land, on the other hand, is much larger than demand over this time period. Therefore
the projections are but one interpretation of how the demand is allocated throughout the region.
This interpretation is, however, based on the numerous discussions between SACOG staff and the
various planning departments.
These 2025 projections were extended to the MTP horizon year of 2027. The methodology for
these projections incorporates regional growth targets provided by the Center for the Continuing
Study of the California Economy (CCSCE). The goal of the modifications is make the minimum
changes to the previous projection set while adjusting the projections to current growth data and
region-level near-term projections that have been published recently. The new projections are
informed by data from the following sources:
• The U.S. Census Bureau’s 2000 census of population and housing
• Annual housing and population estimates for years 2000-2004 from the California State
Department of Finance (DOF), Demographic Research Unit (DRU)
• InfoUSA 2004 employment data
• Projections of employment, population, and households to 2012, from the 2004 annual
report of the Center for the Continuing Study of the California Economy (CCSCE)
• Current General Plan data used in the Sacramento Region Blueprint Project
Year 2005 is the new socio-economic baseline, which represents the most important departure from
the previous projection set in methodology and results. The previous projections were made in
1999 using data from SACOG’s housing inventory, and from the 1990 Census. On the population
and household side, the new baseline starts with household characteristics, the number of persons,
and their spatial location as recorded in the 2000 Census. In consultation with the planning staff of
SACOG’s member jurisdictions, staff endeavored to use all available official planning documents
to estimate the location and amount of growth through 2005. For employment, the 2004 estimates
from InfoUSA were the primary source.
Future allocations of population, households, and employments are based on the relative shares
established in the 2005 baseline. Using sub-regions named Regional Analysis Districts (RAD) and
12 SACOG is currently developing a new 2030 land use base for the region that will be used in the MTP to be adopted
in 2007.
77

consistent with regional targets for the given year, linearly projected relative shares of growth were
applied. General plans and specific plans provide valuable guidance, but these documents do have
important limitations. For example, the supply of residential land is inadequate to satisfy the
projected population growth, and the supply of commercial land exceeds the expected employment
demand. The household characteristics found in Census 2000 are necessarily fixed through the year
2027.
The 2025 data were not changed unless the changes made for all other projection years are higher
than the 2025 numbers. The 2027 data are calculated by increasing the 2025 numbers using the
2020-2025 annual growth rates by jurisdiction.
As noted above, there have been important changes in methodology that are evidenced in
comparisons with the previous projection set. Some important differences are:
• Persons per household (PPH) are down considerably. Census 2000 shows a continued
decline in household size due to a variety of social and economic factors. The PPH is not
geographically homogenous since it includes housing type and other important socioeconomic
variables.
• The previous projections underestimated the amount of growth in the Natomas Basin,
Southwest Placer County, and El Dorado Hills.
• The previous projections overestimated the growth in South Sutter County and Yuba
County, and to lesser extent Yolo County.
• The consistently large difference in employment totals reflects the change in source data.
SACOG has greater confidence in the new employment projections developed by CCSCE.
TRAVEL MODELING ASSUMPTIONS FOR THE 2006 MTP
The household travel survey SACOG conducted in 2000 is a major source of travel behavior data
that was used in the travel demand model employed in the 2006 MTP. The travel data and related
demographic data from the survey are used in the estimation of the model components.
Modification of the survey data is made in the estimation process to match the model to known
travel characteristics, such as traffic counts and transit boardings. Commercial vehicle demand is
estimated as a separate sub-model and incorporated into the overall model. Similarly, external
travel (both passenger vehicle and commercial vehicles) that passes through the region is also
estimated and incorporated into the model.
The travel demand model contains the following elements that are used to produce forecasts of
person and vehicle trips, traffic demand and congestion, and transit demand:
Trip Purposes-Home based Work, Home based Shop, Home based School, Home based Other,
Work based Other, Other based Other, Commercial Vehicles, External to External Vehicles.
Travel modes-Drive alone, Shared ride-two persons, Shared ride-three or more persons, Transitwalk
access, Transit- drive access, Walk, Bicycle
78

Time of day-Morning Peak (7 a.m. to 10 a.m.), mid-day (10 a.m. to 3 p.m.), Afternoon Peak (3
p.m. to 6 p.m.), evening
(6 p.m. to 7 a.m.)
MAJOR DATA SOURCES:
• SACOG Household Travel Survey, 2000
• Commercial Vehicle Survey and Model Development, 1998
• Traffic counts from Caltrans, cities and counties
• Transit ridership counts from Regional Transit and other operators
REFERENCE DOCUMENTS:
• SACMET01 Model Update and Validation Report, March 2002
• Pre-Census Travel Behavior Report: Analysis of the 2000 SACOG Household Travel
Survey, July 2001
FINANCIAL ASSUMPTIONS
FEDERAL AND STATE PROGRAM STRUCTURE
Federal program structure and basic formulas from Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century
(TEA-21 and now SAFETEA-LU), and State basic program structure and formulas from SB 45,
remain in place through 2027.
FEDERAL FUNDING LEVEL
History: Congress increased federal gasoline tax by five cents (+125 percent) in 1982, by five cents
(+55 percent) in 1990, by 4.3 cents for general fund in 1993, and then 4.2 cents transferred from
general purposes to transportation (+30 percent) in 1997. Current level is 18.2 cents. Congress has
increased gas tax rate for policy purposes to support transportation investment. Congress has also
increased federal transit program funding by an average of 5 percent per year since the Intermodal
Surface Transportation Equity Act (ISTEA) in 1991.
Assumption: Escalate federal highway program funding levels by 2% annually with 20% increases
in re-authorization years (2005, 2010, 2016, and 2022). Also increase for a greater regional share of
statewide population following the 2010 and 2020 census. De-escalate for inflation as well as air
quality improvements and fleet fuel efficiencies, where appropriate. Congress approved a 30%
increase through SAFETEA-LU in 2005; the 2006 MTP dedicates the additional federal funding to
Caltrans for state highway rehabilitation.
FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION PROGRAM GRANTS
History: Sacramento has consistently worked with 50 percent-match federal funding for light rail
construction and extensions, one project at a time, since 1980. Through the 1990s it has received an
average 0.3 percent of rail modernization funds nationwide, and has received an average of 0.4
percent of bus replacement funds nationwide over a 20-year time frame.
Assumption: Escalate federal transit program funding levels by 5 percent per year through 2027.
For new rail starts, continue to receive 50 percent-match federal funding for one rail extension at a
time through 2027, 0.3 percent of nationwide rail modernization funds, and 0.4 percent of
79

nationwide bus replacement funds. This matches closely to what Congress approved for
SAFETEA-LU in 2005.
FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION FORMULA GRANTS
History: Congress has provided transit formula grants since 1965, from general funds, decreasing
amounts intermittently from 1982 to 1991, then increasing amounts in ISTEA and TEA-21 but with
restrictions against use for operating subsidy for urban operators.
Assumption: Continue to get population-based formula grants, with funding level escalated by 5
percent per year through 2027. De-escalate totals for inflation. This matches closely what
Congress approved in SAFETEA-LU in 2005.
STATE FUNDING LEVEL
History: Legislature increased state gasoline tax by two cents (29 percent) in 1982, by five cents
(55 percent) in 1990, by one cent per year for 1991-1994 (total 29 percent). Current level is 18
cents. Legislature has increased gas tax rate in arrears in response to loss of purchasing power.
Assumption: Escalate state funding level by five cents (28 percent) in 2011 and five cents (22
percent) in 2021. De-escalate totals for inflation.
STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE (STA)
History: STA is currently funded with 50 percent of state Public Transit Account revenues, which
come from sales tax on gasoline via two formulas (one directly per Proposition 42 of 2002 and one
indirectly from a spillover formula dating from the 1970s). These revenue streams tend to be very
volatile with marginal gas price changes, but gasoline prices have increased irregularly over time at
4 percent above Consumer Price Index with additional temporary windfalls from spikes in gas
prices about every eight years.
Assumption: Escalate by 4% per year for increase in gasoline price; add half of Prop. 42 PTA
funds after 2009; escalate by 2.2% for VMT growth and 4% for gasoline price inflation; escalate
for windfall price spikes in 2011-12 and 2019-20; de-escalate totals for inflation and fleet fuel
efficiency gains.
CALTRANS' STATE HIGHWAY MAINTENANCE AND REHABILITATION
History: The California Transportation Commission funds both Caltrans' highway maintenance
program and highway rehabilitation through the State Highway Operation Protection Plan
(SHOPP), off the top in the fund estimate, currently at about $1 billion per year for maintenance
and $2 billion for SHOPP, a level adequate to keep the state highways in acceptable shape.
Assumption: Continue funding at the current level in real terms, about $125 million per year
reported by the state to be adequate, with a 2.2 percent annual increase in state highway
maintenance program funding to match growth in traffic and lane miles, this level of funding
allows for two very-high-cost rehabilitation projects: Placer I-80 and downtown Sacramento Route
I-5. The gradual increases in maintenance and SHOPP funding cut into funding available for the
region's share of the STIP. De-escalate totals for inflation.
CALTRANS' ITIP
History: The Interregional Transportation Improvement Program (ITIP) receives
25 percent of STIP funds, usable statewide without geographic restriction. The Sacramento region
has been getting about 5 percent of the statewide total, and in fact has a greater-than-average
80

number of high-cost projects in the project delivery pipeline to be built in the time frame 2010-
2020.
Assumption: Continue the flow of ITIP funding at 5 percent of the statewide total, to specific large
projects already in the pipeline, plus smaller projects not yet defined (such as auxiliary lanes, ramp
meters, traffic improvements), generally at a 50 percent RTIP/50 percent ITIP rate. De-escalate
totals for inflation.
SALES TAX FOR TRANSIT (TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT-TDA)
History: Sales tax revenues in Sacramento County, a high-growth county, increased by
8 percent per year compounded from 1975 through 2000, with the rate gradually declining (in line
with California's average sustained Gross Domestic Product growth rate of 7.2 percent per year
since 1980); the rate of increase has been 4-5 percent in smaller, less urban counties and in fully
urbanized counties.
Assumption: Escalate sales tax revenues by 8 percent per year in Placer County (which is entering
a high-growth period), by 6 percent per year in Sacramento County (with continuing above-average
population growth), and by 5 percent per year in the four other counties. De-escalate totals for
inflation.
COUNTY SALES TAXES FOR TRANSPORTATION
History: California's 11 largest counties (including Sacramento) all have transportation sales taxes,
with six at a rate of 1 percent (with 1/2 percent of that for transit only) and the other five (including
Sacramento) at a rate of 1/2 percent. All six with a 1 percent rate enacted two separate measures
anywhere from 4 to 25 years apart. Only 3 of 28 rural counties now have transportation sales taxes.
State law now requires 2/3 voter approval to enact or extend a transportation sales tax.
Assumptions: The MTP 2025 assumed an extension of Sacramento County’s Measure A at 2/3
percent. The agency responsible for the sales tax in Sacramento County is Sacramento
Transportation Authority (STA). STA in 2002 stated its intent to seek an extension of the existing
sales tax which expires in 2009, at such time when the political outlook looked favorable for 67
percent voter approval; the target time initially was aimed for 2006. STA noted the need for a
higher sales tax than the existing ½ percent, to provide additional transit operating funds. STA in
early 2004 decided the time would be right to go for a ballot measure to extend the sales tax in
November 2004, and decided for political reasons to seek extension at the existing ½ percent rate
but increase the portion going to transit operations from 30 percent to 38 percent, and clearly noted
the need to increase the total tax rate to provide more transit funds at a later date. STA’s political
judgment proved to be wise, as the voters approved the extension by a 75 percent vote. Following
the election, STA again reiterated its intent to seek an additional sales tax measure for transit
operations, at a future time when the political outlook again looked favorable. SACOG cannot
determine when that may occur, but believes that to be reasonably expectable by 2016 for four
reasons: historically favorable public opinion towards funding has moved up and down in about
seven year cycles in this state, so a favorable climate should occur at least once by 2016; if an
increase were to be considered at some undetermined time after the current extension takes effect in
2009 and some of its projects have been completed to show success, that allows time for three
ballot tries in 2012, 2014, and 2016, and no urban county in California has failed to enact a sales
tax measure given three tries; six large urban Democratic-leaning counties in California
(comparable to Sacramento) have enacted two sales tax measures, one entirely for transit, and
Sacramento County offers similar demographics and prospects to these six counties; and a measure
81

at ¼ percent from 2016 to 2027 yields about an equivalent amount to the revenue assumed in the
MTP 2025, thus holding constant the results from assumptions from that MTP. For these reasons
SACOG believes it reasonable and conservative to assume STA will act on its stated intent at an
upcoming favorable opportunity and succeed in establishing a second sales tax measure of at least
¼ percent (or perhaps ½ percent) dedicated to transit by no later than a ten-year horizon. For the
MTP 2025, the five remaining SACOG counties asked that the MTP not contain a transportation
sales tax in the revenue projections, and that assumption has been retained in the 2006 MTP.
TRANSIT FARES
History: Transit operators in the Sacramento region have increased fares periodically over the
years, generally in response to inflation in operating costs.
Assumption: Escalate revenues by anticipated ridership growth for all operators. For Sacramento
RT, additional revenues provided from sales tax measures, ridership boosts from major LRT/BRT
lines and fare increases in 2010, 2015, 2020, and 2025. De-escalate all totals for inflation.
LOCAL GENERAL FUNDS
History: Use of local general funds for transportation has declined gradually since Proposition 13
in 1978, with differences due to individual jurisdiction policy.
Assumption: Hold estimated 2005 general funding levels for roads and transit amount constant in
real terms through 2027, jurisdiction by jurisdiction.
IMPACT FEES
History: Counties and cities have imposed areawide fees per housing unit, now typically in the
range $1000-10,000 per house, and collect environmental impact fees for specific large
developments (both commercial and residential).
Assumption: Apply present fee levels to the number of housing units projected to meet population
growth targets, and include a modest additional amount for jurisdictions expecting above-average
office, commercial, and industrial growth. In totaling, reduce El Dorado, Sutter, and Yolo fees by
33%, and Sacramento fees by 10%, in order to account for fee offsets granted to major
developments to compensate for arterials built within the development. Regional impact fees in
Sacramento County will be leveraged as part of Measure A at $1,000 per unit after 2009.
DIRECT DEVELOPER CONSTRUCTION
History: Developer-constructed roads are added to the public stock in an amount directly
proportional to housing and office/manufacturing development.
Assumption: Multiply projected new housing units by unit costs to estimate the total value of
arterials and streets built with developer in-kind funding.
INFLATION
History: Consumer Price Index (CPI) has increased by 86 percent (about 3.1 percent per year), and
Construction Cost Index (CCI) has increased by 93 percent (about
3.4 percent per year) since 1982.
Assumption: As noted for relevant funding categories, the revenue projections de-escalate
revenues to current (2004) values (so projects can be shifted among years without escalating and
de-escalating cost), using deflation rates of 2.7 percent for revenues used for road maintenance
(public employee labor cost), 2.9 percent for revenues used for transit equipment (same as current
82

CPI forecast), 3.4 percent for revenues used for construction (CCI), and 3.5 percent for revenues
used for transit operations (transit labor cost with strike-avoidance policy).
ALTERNATIVE FUEL VEHICLES
History: Alternative fuels are partly or wholly tax-exempt, but the number of vehicles using them
is insignificant to date.
Assumption: Reduce gasoline tax revenues to account for significant numbers of alternate fuel
vehicles entering and comprising an increasing portion of the fleet after 2009, proportional to Air
Resources Board projections for alternative fuel vehicle fleet penetration, which by 2027 results in
a nearly 40 percent reduction in expected gasoline tax revenues.
83

APPENDIX E
LISTING OF PROJECTS AND PROGRAMS.
The project list itemizes all major capital projects, and lists "lump sums" under Various County
Projects.
THE METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM
Bicycle and pedestrian ways
Community connectors-These are roads or transit services that serve as the primary connections
between communities. They are critical to the region's economy and mobility
Freight distribution routes-In addition to roadways already covered, this category includes the Port
of Sacramento's Deep Water Channel into the Sacramento River and the freight rail network.
Ports and airports-These intermodal facilities are a critical element in the movement of freight and
long-distance passenger travel.
Public-transit routes, including bus, light rail, heavy rail passenger lines, and associated
facilities such as stations or terminals and their grounds-Public transit is an important element in
mobility, air-quality and congestion-relief strategies.
River crossings and approaches-River crossings are vital links across natural barriers. Since the
number of available river crossings is limited, these facilities often are congested.
Roads with projected traffic volumes over 25,000 vehicles per day by the year 2025 -This criterion
was developed to address that portion of the road system that accommodates the greatest travel
demand.
Six-lane roadways -Same as the previous criterion.
State highways, and interchanges-State routes and interchanges play a major role
in the transportation system and are required as part of the system by federal and state legislation.
Transportation management facilities and services, including demand-, system-, and operationsmanagement-This
category includes park-and-ride lots, ramp meters, ridesharing services, and
other strategies aimed at improving the efficiency of the transportation system, or increasing the
use of alternative modes of travel. By improving efficiency, these facilities and services contribute
to the overall performance
of the system.
84

Appendix E
Project List
ID Project Title Project Description Total Cost
El Dorado County Caltrans District 3
Completion
Year
CAL16161
CAL17690 U.S. 50
CAL18110
Operational Improvements on
U.S. 50
Hangtown Creek Beautification
at U.S. 50
CAL18190 US 50 Camino Project
SR 49 in Coloma, from the
South Fork American River
CAL18740
Bridge #25-21 to Marshall
Road.
CAL18741
West Placerville Dr. to Bedford: construct EB aux. ln., 2 ln. connection from
Placerville Dr. to Main St., modify traffic signals at Canal, SR 49 & Bedford;
lengthen existing left turn pockets and close existing EB off-ramp to Main St. $32,973,000 2009
Add HOV lanes from El Dorado Hills Blvd. to S. Shingle Springs/Ponderosa
Rd. $47,937,000 2010
Remove abandoned eastbound off-ramp at Main St and re-establish riparian
vegetation $405,000 2009
In El Dorado County, US 50 through Camino: preliminary planning,
engineering and environmental analysis for conversion of expressway to
freeway and future construction of a new interchange. $2,000,000 2015
Construction of a 2-way left turn lane, install stop sign and associated bicycle
and pedestrian facilities $1,300,000 2006
SR-49 Near El Dorado - Widen
Shoulders Near El Dorado - Near Ore Court Road to China Hill Road - widen shoulders $11,364,000 2008
City of Placerville Dept of Public Works
ELD12100 Placerville Road Rehabilitation In Placerville, various locations: rehabilitate roads -arterials, collectors and
transit routes. $1,076,849 2006
ELD14090
ELD15890
ELD15900
ELD16060
ELD19100
ELD15610
Clay Street at Cedar Ravine
Main Street
Washington Street
US 50 Western Placerville
Interchanges
Point View Drive
US 50 Silva Valley Rd
Interchange
In Placerville, Clay Street at Main/Cedar Ravine: realign to a four-way
intersection , reconstruct Clay Street Bridge and Ivy House parking lot.
$1,500,000 2006
Realign Main St. to provide two one-way roadways from Washington ST. to
Broadway at U.S. 50 WB off ramp.
$2,400,000 2017
Widen and realign Washington Street to Turner Street from Cedar Ravine
Road to Main Street. At a minimum, add curb, gutter, bike lanes, turn pockets,
and a widened travel way. $1,300,000 2015
US 50 Western Placerville Interchanges Project. Widen Forni Road and
ramps and new auxilary lane
$29,300,000 2012
In the City of Placerville, Point View Drive from Broadway to Smith Flat Road:
extend two-lane road. $1,300,000 2008
El Dorado County Dept of Transportation
In El Dorado County, US 50 at Silva Valley Road: construct new interchange
with overcrossing and ramps. Add aux lanes halfway to next interchange
westbound to EDH and aux lane eastbound connecting to existing truck
climbing lane. $46,200,000 2008
ELD10080 Silva Valley Pkwy. Widen from 2 to 4 lanes from Harvard Wy. to Green Valley Rd.
ELD10090
ELD12000
ELD15010
White Rock Road Widening
El Dorado County Road
Rehabilitation
Cameron Park Drive
Widen White Rock Rd from the Sacramento/El Dorado County line to Latrobe
Rd from 2 to 4 lanes.
$8,000,000 2020
$1,708,000 2006
In El Dorado County, various locations, rehabilitate roads: arterials, collectors
and transit routes.
$1,560,700 2006
In El Dorado County, Cameron Park Drive, Palmer Drive to Green Valley
Road: conduct operational and safety analysis to identify and prioritize needed
improvements. $840,145 2006
ELD15040 Cameron Park Drive Widen from 2 to 4 lanes, Meder Rd. to Green Valley Rd. (4 segments)
ELD15050
Cameron Park Drive Widening
Widen Cameron Park Dr from Palmer Dr to Meder Rd from 2 to 4 lanes
(Phase 1).
ELD15080 Durock Road Widen 2 to 4 lanes, Shingle Lime Rd. to Rodeo Rd.
ELD15130 El Dorado Hills Blvd. Widen from 2 to 4 lanes from Green Valley Rd to Harvard Wy.
ELD15160 Green Valley Rd. Widen from 2 to 4 lanes from Francisco Dr. to Salmon Falls Rd.
$9,700,000 2010
$14,335,000 2010
$5,500,000 2010
$10,000,000 2008
$1,900,000 2015
ELD15170 Green Valley Rd. Widen from 2 to 4 lanes from Salmon Falls Rd. to Silva Valley Rd.
$1,100,000 2015
Widen Latrobe Rd from Golden Foothill Parkway to the southern entrance to
ELD15230 Latrobe Road Widening
Valley View from 2 to 4 lanes. $11,400,000 2007
Page 1 of 23 4/4/2006

Appendix E
Project List
ID Project Title Project Description Total Cost
Completion
Year
ELD15250 Missouri Flat Rd. Widen from 2 to 4 lanes from Headington Rd. to Prospector Plaza Drive.
ELD15260 Mother Lode Dr. Widen from 2 to 4 lanes from French Creek Rd. to Pleasant Valley Rd.
ELD15270 Mother Lode Dr. Widen from 2 to 4 lanes from South Shingle Rd. to French Creek Rd.
ELD15370 White Rock Rd. Widen from 2 to 4 lanes Latrobe Rd. to U.S. 50.
ELD15540 Cambridge Road Widening Widen Cambridge Rd from U.S. 50 to Country Club Rd from 2 to 4 lanes.
ELD15560 South Shingle Rd. Widen from 2 to 4 lanes from U.S. 50 to Durock Rd.
ELD15570 Palmer Drive Construct new two-lane road between Wild Chaparral Dr. and Palmer Dr.
$2,400,000 2007
$20,100,000 2025
$3,000,000 2009
$12,400,000 2006
$1,488,000 2014
$1,800,000 2006
$9,700,000 2010
ELD15580 Serrano Parkway Construct new two-lane road from Greenview Drive to Bass Lake Road.
$2,400,000 2006
ELD15630 US 50 at El Dorado Hills Blvd.
In El Dorado County, US 50 at El Dorado Hills Blvd: Phase 1.3 and Phase 2
ultimate. Includes aux lanes halfway to east Silva Valley Rd interchange and
aux lane westbound to county line. $49,700,000 2007
ELD15680 Pleasant Valley Rd. Intersection improvements at Buck's Bar Rd.
ELD15690
ELD15930
ELD15940
ELD15950
ELD15960
ELD15970
ELD15990
ELD16000
ELD16010
ELD16150
ELD19165
ELD19182
US 50 Missouri Flat Road
Interchange
Cameron Park Drive
Country Club Drive
Country Club Drive
El Dorado Hills Blvd.
Green Valley Road
Missouri Flat Rd. / Pleasant
Valley Rd.
Pleasant Valley Rd.
Saratoga Way Extension
Green Valley Road Bridge
Replacement
El Dorado Hills Blvd Interchange
Phase 1.2B: Enhancements
US 50 Bass Lake Rd
Interchange
In El Dorado County, US 50 at Missouri Flat Road: Phase 1. Modify existing
interchange to tight diamond configuration.
Widen Cameron Park to provide a consistent 4 lane divided road from Robin
Lane to Palmer Dr. and a 4 lane undivided road to Oxford Road.
Construct a new two lane road from Bass Lake Rd. to Merrychase Dr. to
replace an existing 2-lane road located parallel to U.S. 50
Construct a new 2 lane road parallel to U.S. 50. from Bass Lake Road to Silva
Valley Parkway
Widen El Dorado Hills Blvd. from Park Avenue to Serrano Parkway from 5 to 6
lanes and provide a bicycle/pedestrian pathway
$5,900,000 2019
$41,800,000 2008
$3,000,000 2006
$4,300,000 2022
$5,800,000 2022
$1,800,000 2021
Widen Green Valley Road from 2 to 4 lanes from Silva Valley Parkway and
Deer Valley Road (west)
$12,600,000 2016
Construct a new 2 lane divided roadway from Missouri Flat, north of China
Garden, to Pleasant Valley Road / Route 49 at Fowler Lane. Involves
realignment of Missouri Flat and Route 49 north of Pleasant Valley Road. $17,800,000 2008
Widen Pleasant Valley Rd. from El Dorado Rd. to Route 49 (south) to provide
a divided roadway. No additional travel lanes.
Construct a new 4 lane undivided road from the County line to Arrowhead Dr.
Includes a Class 1 bicycle/ pedestrian pathway.
In El Dorado County, Green Valley Road at Tennessee Creek: replace existing
bridge.
$1,800,000 2019
$6,200,000 2007
$1,970,000 2008
US 50 at El Dorado Hills Boulevard: construct channelization improvements to
the westbound on and off ramps and improvements to El Dorado Hills
Boulevard underneath US 50. This project is one piece of the overall
interchange project listed under ELD15630. $1,808,000 2006
In El Dorado County, US 50 at Bass Lake Rd: modify existing interchange by
widening off-ramps to provide turn lanes, widen on-ramps for ramp metering
and HOV bypass lanes, install traffic signals add aux lanes halfway to next
interchange eastbound, lengthen bridges. $28,000,000 2008
ELD19181
US 50 Cambridge Rd
Interchange
In El Dorado County, US 50 at Cambridge Rd: modify existing interchange by
installing traffic signals, contruct w/b slip on-ramp, widen off-ramps to provide
turn lanes, widen on-ramps for ramp metering and HOV bypass lane, add aux
lanes halfway to next interchange east and west, widen bridge. $35,500,000 2006
Page 2 of 23 4/4/2006

Appendix E
Project List
ID Project Title Project Description Total Cost
Completion
Year
ELD15150
Green Valley Road
In El Dorado County, Green Valley Road from Francisco Drive to 780 feet E:
widen from 2 to 4 lanes. $700,000 2007
ELD19187 Green Valley Road
ELD15230 Latrobe Road Phase 2
ELD15230 Latrobe Road Phase 1
In El Dorado County, Green Valley Road from County Line to Francisco Drive:
widen from 2 to 4 lanes. $5,700,000 2009
In El Dorado County, Latrobe Road from Golden Foothill Parkway (s) to
Carson Creek (Suncast Lane): widen from 2 to 4 lanes and construct
intersection improvements and signalization at Golden Foothill Parkway. $12,200,000 2007
In El Dorado County, Latrobe Road from White Rock Road to US 50: widen to
3 NB and 3 SB lanes. $4,800,000 2008
ELD19179
Sophia Parkway
In El Dorado County, Sophia Parkway from Green Valley Road to Alexandria
Road: widen from 2 to 4 lanes. $800,000 2010
ELD15370 White Rock Road
In El Dorado County, White Rock Road from Latrobe Road to Silva Valley
Parkway/US 50 Interchange: widen from 2 to 4 lanes. $12,200,000 2009
ELD19178
US 50 El Dorado Rd
Interchange
El Dorado Rd/US50 Intrchg (Includes Study for El Dorado Rd improvements
GP136) (Environmental & P.E. only) $6,880,000 2009
ELD19177
US 50 Cameron Park Dr
Interchange Cameron Park Dr I/C (Environmental & P.E. only) $31,918,481 2010
ELD19180
US 50 Ponderosa Rd
Interchange North Shingle Rd/Ponderosa Rd Intchg (Environmental & P.E. only) $43,460,000 2010
El Dorado County Transit
ELD15650
FTA 5309 Commuter Bus
El Dorado Transit - Purchase Replacement and New Service commuter buses
Acquisition
$1,285,421 2007
ELD15740 Diamond Springs Construction of Central Park and Ride Facility.
$471,960 2008
ELD16080
El Dorado County Transit
Purchase an additional 40 buses (10 buses every 4 years) to provide
commuter services. Cost estimate includes Capital and Operational costs.
$20,300,000 2025
ELD16090 Park and Ride lots Acquisition and build-out of pubic park and ride facilities adjacent to U.S. 50
$4,000,000 2025
ELD16100
Commuter Bus Service to light Purchase an additional 12 commuter buses (4 every 3 years) and replace
rail
after 10 years. Cost includes operational costs. $6,500,000 2025
ELD19155
Operating Assistance - FTA
Operating assistance grant - FTA 5311 (rural program)
5311 (Grant Cycle 23)
$236,180 2006
ELD19156
Operating Assistance - FTA
Operating assistance - FTA 5311 (rural program)
5311 (Cycle 22)
$236,180 2006
ELD19157
FTA 5310 Transit Vehicle Replacement of four (4) transit buses and purchase of two (2) mini-vans for
Replacement
minor service expansion. $322,000 2006
ELD19160
FTA 5307 Preventive
Bus acquisition and Preventive Maintenance
maintenance.
$364,000 2008
ELD19161
FTA 5307 Bus Acquisition and
Bus Acquisition and Preventive maintenance
Preventive Maintenance
$80,000 2007
ELD19164
FTA 5307 Bus Acquisition and
Bus acquisition and Preventive maintenance
Preventive Maintenance
$364,000 2007
El Dorado County Transportation Commission
ELD15710 El Dorado County PPM Plan, program and monitor
$531,000 2009
IRR TIP Projects El Dorado County
Shingle Springs Rancheria Project on US Route 50, (IRR TIP Project ID
IRR38300
Shingle Springs Interchange --
38300, Route No. 0315) connecting the Rancheria to US Route 50. See
Hwy 50
Appendix L. $23,000,000 2009
Placer County Caltrans District 3
CAL16390 I-80
Ramp metering at all interchanges from Foresthill Road to Sacramento County
Line. $4,210,195 2011
CAL16400 I-80 Bridge modifications at King Rd., Penryn Rd., Gillard Rd., Newcastle OC. $10,000,000 2011
CAL16410 I-80 Bridge modifications at Brace Rd., Horseshoe Bar Rd. $10,000,000 2011
CAL16460 Route 193 Rehabilitate roadway from Sierra College to Newcastle. $5,000,000 2012
CAL16470 Route 49 Improvements Auburn - Route 80 to Dry Creek Road - operational improvements $11,105,000 2008
CAL16750 I-80 Raise overcrossings at 7 interchanges. $25,000,000 2012
Near Lincoln - Industrial Boulevard to south of Yuba County line - construct
CAL17240 Route 65 Lincoln Bypass new 4 lane expressway/freeway on new alignment. $262,533,000 2011
CAL17480 1-80 from SR 193 to SR 174
Near Auburn, 1-80 from SR 193 to Auburn Ravine; and .5 miles west of
Auburn Ravine to SR 174; road and bridge rehabilitation $64,300,000 2007
CAL17510 I-80, Colfax Narrows Project
In and near Colfax, from Route 174 to Magra Overhead - Preliminary
Engineering for roadway rehabilitation, construction of truck-climbing lanes,
and adding ITS improvements. $276,310 2014
CAL18200 I-80
In Placer County, I-80 from east of SR 65 to west of the Sacramento County
line: construct HOV lanes. $160,000,000 2011
Page 3 of 23 4/4/2006

Appendix E
Project List
ID Project Title Project Description Total Cost
Completion
Year
CAL18260 I-80
Construct a truck climbing lane on eastbound I-80 between the Southern
Pacific railroad trestle (just north of Colfax) and the Alpine interchange. $30,000,000 2015
CAL18731
I-80 Blue Canyon Road
Rehabilitation Near Blue Canyon - Nyack to Carpenter Flat - Rehabilitate roadway $24,690,000 2011
CAL18732
I-80 Drainage Improvements
Near Blue Canyon
Near Blue Canyon and Cisco Grove - Nyack to Rainbow - Drainage
Improvements $3,439,000 2010
CAL18733
I-80 Gold Run Safety Roadside
Rest Area Near Gold Run - Rehabilitate Gold Run Safety Roadside Rest Area $6,893,000 2010
CAL18734
I-80 Rainbow to Kingvale Road
Rehab In Placer County - Rainbow to Kingvale - rehabilitate roadway $28,355,000 2008
CAL18735
I-80 Roseville Planting &
Irrigation Rehabilitation
In Roseville - Sacramento County Line to 0.2 mile west of Douglas Blvd -
planting and irrigation rehabilitation $2,559,000 2007
New SR 267 Truck climbing lane south of Northstar $2,000,000 2010
PLA18960 G Street
Widen from 2 to 4 lanes with left-turn pockets from Westlake Blvd. to Industrial
Blvd. $3,100,000 2015
PLA18965 G Street
In Lincoln, G Street, Westlake Blvd. to Industrial Blvd.: widen from 4 to 6
lanes. $3,100,000 2020
PLA18980 Route 65 Widen from 2 to 4 lanes from Gladding to Westlake Blvd. $1,000,000 2007
PLA19610 Route 65 Construct interchange at Whitney Blvd. $9,200,000 2022
PLA20090 Placer County
In eastern Placer County, SR 267 from Nevada County line to Northstar:
widen from 2 to 4 lanes. $10,000,000 2025
PLA20840 I-80 at Route 174, Interchange
In Placer County, near City of Colfax: along I-80 at Route 174, construct new
interchange $30,000,000 2010
City of Auburn Dept of Public Works
PLA20200 Auburn Transit Operations Operate Auburn Transit $741,270 2007
City of Colfax Dept of Public Works
New Railroad Avenue
Construct North South connector road on Railroad Ave with pedestrian and
bicycle improvements $2,000,000 2008
Colfax Depot Restoration -
PLA20361 In Colfax, complete interior restoration of the Colfax multimodal station project.
Interior
$500,000 2006
Construct pedestrian and bicycle paths, sidewalks, park and ride lots, an
Colfax Downtown Gateway
PLA20390 "open air" railroad museum, and landscaping near the Historic Freight Depot
project
building. $500,000 2015
PLA20420 Canyon Way / I-80 Overpass Intersection improvements at Canyon Way and I-80 Overpass. $350,000 2015
PLA20430 Rising Sun Road
Reconstruct Rising Sun Road and improve intersection at Ben Taylor Road
and Church St. $300,000 2015
PLA20450 Colfax Bicycle Path Network
Develop a network of bicycle paths throughout Colfax, connecting to major
transportation centers $1,000,000 2025
PLA25024
Bike lanes on South Auburn
Street Add bike lanes on both sides of street $112,956 2007
PLA25158
Downtown Colfax Bike Lane
Extension
From Downtown Multi-modal station, construct bike path extension to the
intersection of Main Street and SR 174. $90,000 2006
City of Lincoln Dept of Public Works
New Ferrari Ranch Road Widen from 4 to 6 lanes from SR 65 Bypass to Lincoln Pkwy.
New Ferrari Ranch Road Widen from 2 to 4 lanes from E. Caledon Cir. To City limits
New
Ferrari Ranch Road
Widen from 2 to 4 lanes from SR 65 to SR 193, including intersection
improvements.
$488,000 2010
$502,000 2010
$2,252,000 2010
New Joiner Parkway Construct new 4-lane road from Lakeside Dr. to Nicolaus Rd.
$600,000 2006
New Lincoln Parkway
Widen from 2 to 4 lanes from Ferrari Ranch Rd. to Sterling Pkwy., including
SR 65/UPRR overcrossing.
$415,000 2006
PLA15970 Nicholaus Rd. Widen from 2 to 4 lanes from Airport Rd. to Aviation Blvd. $2,000,000 2010
PLA18630 Aviation Blvd.
Construct new 4 lane road from terminus 0.5 miles north of Venture Dr. to
Wise Rd. $750,000 2015
PLA18650 Aviation Blvd.
Widen from 2 to 4 lanes from Venture Dr. to terminus 0.5 miles north of
Venture Dr. $300,000 2010
PLA18710 Industrial Blvd. Widen from 2 to 4 lanes from Route 65 to 12 Bridges Dr. $947,553 2010
PLA18720 Industrial Blvd. Widen from 2 to 4 lanes from 12 Bridges Dr. to Athens Blvd. $758,043 2010
PLA18730 Lakeside Dr. Widen from 2 to 4 lanes from Nicolaus Rd. to Venture Dr. $307,000 2010
PLA18760 Lincoln Pkwy.
Widen from 4 to 6 lanes from Ferrari Ranch Rd. to Sterling Pkwy., including
SR65/UPRR overcrossing. $400,000 2010
PLA18770 Lincoln Pkwy. Widen from 2 to 4 lanes from Sterling Pkwy. To Del Webb Blvd. $174,400 2010
PLA18790 Lincoln Pkwy. Widen from 2 to 4 lanes from Del Webb Blvd. to Twelve Bridges. $260,000 2010
PLA18810 Lincoln Pkwy. Widen from 2 to 4 lanes from 12 Bridges Dr. to Rocklin city limits. $450,000 2010
PLA18950 Route 193 Widen from 2 to 4 lanes from Ferrari Ranch Rd. to Sierra College Blvd $190,000 2008
PLA19020 West 12 Bridges Dr.
Widen from 2 to 4 lanes from Industrial Blvd. to SR 65 including interchange
improvements. $209,467 2015
Page 4 of 23 4/4/2006

Appendix E
Project List
ID Project Title Project Description Total Cost
Completion
Year
Ferrari Ranch Road at SR 65
PLA19070 SR 65 Lincoln Bypass at Ferrari Ranch Rd.: construct interchange
Bypass
$12,000,000 2008
PLA20210 Lincoln Transit Buses In Lincoln, purchase 8 replacement transit buses. $1,900,000 2012
PLA20230
Lincoln Transit Operating
Assistance
Operating funds for Lincoln Transit
$3,500,000 2012
PLA20740 Airport Road
PLA20750 Airport Road
Construct 2-lane road from Weco Access Rd. to Wise Rd. (appx. 1 mile).
Reconstruct 1 mile of an existing 2-lane road from Nicolaus Rd. to Weco
Access Rd..
$1,928,000 2015
$643,000 2010
PLA20760 Venture Drive
PLA20780 Gladding Parkway
PLA20790 Nicolaus Road
PLA20810 East Avenue
PLA25022
PLA25023
PLA25032
Auburn Ravine Bridge
NEV Transportation Project
State Route 65 Signal
Coordination Project
PLA25151 West Oaks Blvd
Widen from 2 to 4 lanes from Aviation Blvd. to Lakeside Dr.
$900,000 2020
Construct a new 2 lane roadway from Nicolaus Rd. near K St. to East Ave.
near 9th St. including overpass over UPRR and SR 65 and connections to
12th St. $4,400,000 2020
Reconstruct existing 2-lane roadway with drainage improvements from
Aviation Blvd. to Airport Rd..
Reconstruct and restripe existing 2-lane roadway from East 9th St. to Route
193.
$1,200,000 2010
$1,900,000 2010
Preliminary Engineering, Environmental Documentation, Permitting, and
Construction of Neighborhood Electric Vehicle (NEV) and pedestrian bridge
crossing Auburn Ravine. Preliminary Engineering, Environmental
Documentation, and Permitting for future vehicle bridge at same location. $1,300,000 2009
Preliminary Engineering, Environmental Document, Permitting, and
Construction of Class I,II,& III NEV Routes on various streets within the City of
Lincoln. $278,000 2006
Analysis, design, and construction of traffic signal modifications, signage, and
striping improvements along State Route 65 from Ferrari Ranch Road to 7th
Street to relieve traffic congestion within downtown Lincoln. $315,000 2006
City of Rocklin Division of Engineering
Construct new 4-lane extension from terminus to 4-lane portion to Whitney
Ranch Pkwy
$2,100,000 2008
PLA19330 Sierra College Boulevard
PLA25156 Sunset Blvd
Widen to 4 lanes from north Loomis town limits to Clover Valley intersection
Widen to 6 lanes from NB SR65 ramp to West Stanford Ranch Rd.
$210,000 2010
$680,000 2008
PLA15400 Sierra College Boulevard Widen to 6 lanes from Interstate I-80 to Aguilar Tributary
$2,000,000 2007
PLA15530 Pacific St. Widen to 4 lanes from Sierra Meadows to Loomis Town Limits. $4,000,000 2016
PLA15620 Sunset Blvd. Widen from 4 to 6 lanes, from Topaz to S. Whitney Blvd. $600,000 2012
PLA17910 Sunset Blvd.
Widen bridge at SPRR from 4 to 6 lanes from South Whitney Blvd. to Pacific
St. $1,650,000 2012
PLA19230 Argonaut Avenue Construct 2 lanes from Yankee Hill Rd to Del Mar Ave $4,000,000 2016
PLA19250 Clover Valley Parkway Construct 2 lanes from Park Drive to Sierra College Blvd.
$9,500,000 2010
PLA19260 Dominguez Road
In Rocklin, Dominguez Road: extend with 2 lanes from Granite Drive to Sierra
College Boulevard. $3,200,000 2015
PLA19270 Lone Tree Blvd. Widen from 3 to 4 lanes from Sandhill Dr. to West Oaks Blvd. $825,000 2006
In Rocklin, construct new 4-lane facility from east of Liberty Pkwy to Park
PLA19290 Whitney Ranch Parkway
Drive.
$8,995,000 2010
PLA19310 Park Dr. Widen Park Dr. from 4 to 6 lanes from Sunset Blvd. to Farrier. $1,300,000 2010
PLA19320 Park Drive
PLA19330 Sierra College Boulevard
PLA19400 Rocklin Road
PLA19401 Rocklin Road
PLA19490 I-80
Widen from 4 to 6 lanes from Roseville City Limits to Sunset Blvd.
$1,000,000 2010
In Rocklin, Sierra College Boulevard: widen to 4 lanes from intersection with
Clover Valley Parkway to Loomis town limits. $1,270,000 2010
In Rocklin, Rocklin Road: widen to 6 lanes from Granite Drive to westbound I-
80 ramps. $200,000 2010
In Rocklin, Rocklin Rd. from Eastbound I-80 on-ramps to Sierra College Blvd:
widen from 4 to 6 lanes.
$1,350,000 2010
Widen existing Sierra College Blvd IC from 2 to 5 lanes, including the on- and
off-ramps and loops. $28,548,000 2007
Page 5 of 23 4/4/2006

Appendix E
Project List
ID Project Title Project Description Total Cost
PLA20460 Sierra College Boulevard
PLA20470
Sierra College Blvd.
PLA20480 China Garden Bike Lane
Completion
Year
In Rocklin, Sierra College Blvd from Aguilar Tributary to Nightwatch: widen
from 2 to 4 lanes.
$950,000 2010
Widen Sierra College Blvd. from 2 to 4 lanes from I-80 interchange to Aguilar
Tributary. $1,800,000 2007
Construct Class I bike facilities along Secret Ravine from Roseville city limits
to Monument Springs Rd. and Class II bike facilities from Aguilar St. to Vista
Oaks $1,500,000 2008
PLA20490 Pacific Street
Construct Class II bicycle facilities on Pacific St. from Dominguez Rd. to
Loomis city limits.
$400,000 2010
PLA20500 Sierra College Blvd.
Widen Sierra College Blvd. from 4 to 6 lanes from Aguilar Tributary to
Nightwatch Drive. $2,170,000 2008
PLA25025
Whitney Ranch Parkway
Construction In Rocklin, construct new 4-lane facility from SR 65 to east of Sioux Street. $2,300,000 2010
PLA25119 Sierra College Boulevard Widen to 6 lanes from Granite Drive to RR tracks. $700,000 2007
City of Roseville
PLA15600 Sierra College Boulevard South Rocklin City Limits to Olympus Drive, widen road from 2 to 4 lanes.
$3,700,000 2006
Roseville Transit Operating
PCT10190 Assistance Operating Assistance for Roseville Transit $16,254,583 2007
Roseville Transit Computer
PCT10420 Roseville Transit: purchase AVL and computer assisted software.
Purchases
$750,000 2006
PLA15660 Baseline Rd. Widen from 2 to 4 lanes, from City Limits to west of Foothills Blvd. $5,000,000 2010
PLA15690 Cirby Way Widen from 4-6 lanes from Regency St. to Oak Ridge Dr. $2,000,000 2015
PLA15710
I-80 Eureka Road On-Ramp
Improvements
In Roseville, Eureka Rd. at I-80: add 4th WB thru lane from 500' E of N.
Sunrise to EB I-80 on-ramp and change existing #1 NB and SB thru lanes at
Sunrise/Eureka to left turn lanes. $3,000,000 2008
PLA15720 Eureka Blvd. Widen from 2 to 4 lanes, from Sierra College to City Limits. $500,000 2012
PLA15730 Foothills Blvd. Widen from 4 to 5 lanes, from Cirby to Atkinson. $750,000 2008
PLA15740 Galleria Blvd. Widen from 4 to 6 lanes, from Berry to Roseville Pkwy. $1,500,000 2018
PLA15760
Pleasant Grove Boulevard
Widening
Pleasant Grove Boulevard
Widening
Widen Pleasant Grove Blvd from Foothills Blvd to Wood Creek Oaks from 4 to
6 lanes
Widen Pleasant Grove Blvd from Woodcreek Oaks Blvd to Sun City Blvd from
2 to 4 lanes
$1,500,000 2015
PLA15790
$1,700,000 2006
PLA15810 Roseville Pkwy. Construct 4 lane segment from Washington Blvd. to Foothills Blvd. $8,000,000 2010
PLA15830 Roseville Pkwy. Widen from 2 to 4 lanes from City Limits to Sierra College Blvd. $850,000 2022
PLA15890 Sunrise Ave. Widen from 4 to 6 lanes, from Sacramento County line to Madden Ln. $5,000,000 2015
PLA15910 Taylor Rd. Widen from 2 to 4 lanes from Roseville Pkwy to I-80 $500,000 2015
PLA15911 Taylor Rd. Widen from 2 to 4 lanes, I-80 to City Limits. $4,000,000 2015
PLA15920 Washington Blvd.
Widen from 2 to 4 lanes, from Sawtell to Blue Oaks, including Andora
undercrossing. $12,000,000 2010
PLA16080
Roseville Park and Ride
Facilities In Roseville, design and construct park and ride facilities. $2,550,000 2006
PLA17950 Cirby Way Widen from 4 to 5 lanes, from Riverside Ave. to Regency Way. $500,000 2015
PLA19470 Woodcreek Oaks
Widen from 2 - 4 lanes from Canavari Dr to North Branch of Pleasant Grove
Creek.
$5,000,000 2010
In Roseville, Fairway Drive from Highland Park Dr. to Blue Oaks Blvd.: widen
PLA19590 Fairway Drive
from 2 to 4 lanes.
$500,000 2010
PLA19810 Atkinson Street/PFE Road Widen to four lanes from Foothills Blvd to city limits $8,000,000 2008
PLA19841
PLA19860
PLA19900
PLA19960
Roseville Maintenance Facility
Upgrades
Upgrade existing Vehicle Maintenance facility, at City of Roseville Corporation
Yard (2005 Hilltop Circle). Upgrade to allow for work on CNG buses. $1,842,000 2007
Roseville Bikeway Master Plan
Implementation In Roseville, provide signs and striping for new class 2 and 3 bikeways. $105,000 2007
Construct Class 1 bikeway from Dry Creek to Champions Oaks Blvd. (Linda
Linda Creek
Creek Class 1 Bikeway) $2,500,000 2008
Roseville, Harding Blvd. @ Dry Creek, I-80 to Royer Park: construct class 1
I-80 to Royer Park Bikeway bikeway in 2 phases. $3,140,143 2006
PLA19980 Roseville
PLA20220
PLA20250
Atkinson Street Bridge
Replacement
Sierra College Boulevard
Widening
Construct pedestrian/bicycle bridge to span the Union Pacific Railyard.
Replace existing 2 lane Atkinson St Bridge at Dry Creek with a 4-lane bridge
Widen Sierra College Blvd from Olympus Dr to north city limits from 2 to 4
lanes
$190,000 2006
$4,100,000 2006
$3,700,000 2006
PLA20291 Roseville Multitransit Center In Central Roseville, construct parking facilities for multi-modal transit center $2,600,000 2008
Page 6 of 23 4/4/2006

Appendix E
Project List
ID Project Title Project Description Total Cost
PLA20870
PLA25027
PLA25028
Downtown Roseville
Revitalization
Historic District Revitalization
Project
Riverside Avenue Revitalization
Project
In Roseville, revitalization of downtown historical district.
Completion
Year
$585,896 2006
In Roseville Historic District on Main, Church, Lincoln and Pacific Streets; Add
streetscape improvements including landscaping, lighting, street furniture and
specialty pavement; infrastructure improvements including water, sewer,
storm drain, curb, gutter, sidewalk and pavement rehabilitation. $5,600,000 2006
Riverside Ave. from Douglas Blvd. to Darling Way; develop project area
specific plan, add streetscape improvements including landscape, lighting,
signage, street furniture, and specialty pavement; and rehabilitate water,
sewer, curb, gutter, sidewalk and pavement. $9,000,000 2007
PLA25029 Roseville Roadway Resurfacing Asphalt resurfacing of various roadways in Roseville. $1,600,000 2006
Roseville Transit Preventive
PLA25120 Maintenance In Roseville, perform preventive maintenance for Roseville Transit. $1,690,000 2007
Placer County Dept of Public Works
PLA15070 I-80 Widen the Auburn Ravine Rd. overcrossing from 2 to 4 lanes. $5,000,000 2010
PLA15080 Auburn-Folsom Rd Widening
Widen Auburn-Folsom Rd from Sacramento County line to Douglas Bl. from 2
to 4 lanes (three phases) $21,300,000 2009
PLA15100 Baseline Road
In Placer County, Baseline Rd. from Fiddyment Rd. to Watt Ave.: widen from 2
to 4 lanes.
$4,500,000 2007
PLA15105 Baseline Road Widen from 2 to 4 lanes from Watt Avenue to Sutter County line. $5,698,500 2007
PLA15120 Bill Francis Dr. Contruct 2-lane road from new Airport Rd. to old Airport Rd. $1,000,000 2010
PLA15130
I-80 Bowman Undercrossing
Road Widen from 2 to 4 lanes from Bowman Rd to Lincoln Way. $560,000 2014
PLA15270 North Antelope Rd. Widen from 2 to 4 lanes from Sacramento County line to PFE Rd. $209,700 2010
PLA15300 Parallel Road.
Construct as a 2 lane road from Dry Creek Rd. to Quartz Rd., east of Route
49, including a connector to Locksley Lane and Quartz Drive.
$3,500,000 2015
PLA15330 Quartz Dr. Construct as a 2 lane road from Route 49 southeast to Bell Rd. $404,000 2015
PLA15390 Sierra College Blvd. Widen from 2 to 4 lanes from Route 193 to Loomis Town Limits. $4,400,000 2010
PLA15410 Sunset Blvd. Construct a 4-lane road extension from Cincinnati Ave to Fiddyment Rd. $1,168,100 2022
PLA15420 Walerga Road.
PLA16840
Douglas Road
Widen and realign from 2 to 4 lanes from Baseline Rd. to Sacramento Co.
line.
$7,400,000 2009
In Placer County, Douglas Road: widen from 4 to 6 lanes from Cavitt Stallman
Road south to Sierra College Boulevard. $500,000 2008
PLA18380 16th Street
Phased construction of a 4 lane road from Baseline Rd. to Sacramento County
line.
$244,000 2009
Extend road west/north to Baseline Rd. at Brewer Rd. and east/north to
PLA18390 Dyer Lane
Baseline Rd. (west of Fiddyment Rd.) and widen to 4 lanes in accordance with
the Placer Vineyards Specific Plan. $16,000,000 2009
PLA18420 Foothills Blvd. Construct as 2 lane road from Athens Rd. to the City of Lincoln. $6,800,000 2025
PLA18450 Indian Hill Rd. Widen from 2 to 4 lanes from Auburn City Limits to Newcastle. $8,000,000 2023
PLA18460 Industrial Avenue
Widen from 2 to 4 lanes, from Sunset Blvd. to Athens Rd.
$1,500,000 2015
PLA18490 PFE Road.
Widen from 2 to 4 lanes and realign from Watt Ave. to Walerga Rd.
$2,000,000 2015
PLA19510 Route 65 Construct Sunset Blvd. interchange. $16,800,000 2009
PLA20350 Local Roads in Auburn
In and near Auburn - adjacent to SR 49 between I-80 and Dry Creek Rd.,
construct new local connector road. State and local funding only. $2,000,000 2007
PLA20560 Bell Road
Widen from 3 to 4 lanes (additional eastbound lane) from Professional Drive to
Richardson Drive $2,000,000 2010
PLA20570 Placer Hills Road
Widen from 2 to 3 lanes to accomodate truck climbing lane from .25 mile north
of Sugar Pine Rd. to Combie Rd. Also add left turn pockets at appropriate
intersections. $3,360,000 2007
PLA20620 Foothills Boulevard Extension
Phased construction of a 4 lane road extension from Sunset Blvd to Athens
Ave..
$3,300,000 2020
PLA20650 Lincoln Way Widen from 2 to 4 lanes from Russell Road to Ferguson Road. $370,000 2015
PLA20660 New Road Construct a new 2-lane road between Kemper Rd. and Mt. Vernon Rd. $1,300,000 2010
PLA20670 Route 49 Bypass
Construct a 4 lane limited access roadway to provide bypass to Route 49
through Auburn from Bell Rd. (East of New Airport Rd.) to I-80 (Bowman
Interchange). $60,000,000 2025
PLA20680 Baseline Road Widen From 4 to 6 lanes from Watt Avenue to Fiddyment Road. $1,100,000 2015
PLA20690 PFE Road Widen from 2 to 4 lanes from North Antelope Rd. to Roseville City Limits. $410,000 2015
PLA20700 Watt Avenue Widen from 2 to 4 lanes from Baseline Rd. to Sacramento County Line. $4,745,000 2009
PLA20710 Sierra College Blvd.
Widen from 4 to 6 lanes from north of Douglas Blvd. to Sacramento County
Line. $5,000,000 2020
Page 7 of 23 4/4/2006

Appendix E
Project List
ID Project Title Project Description Total Cost
Completion
Year
PLA20730 Nelson Road
Widen from 2 to 4 lanes from Future Route 65 Bypass interchange to Nicolaus
Road. $1,100,000 2014
PLA20880 Walerga Road Bridge Widening
In Placer County, Walerga Road at Dry Creek: replace bridge and widen from
2 to 4 lanes. $6,500,000 2009
PLA25006 TART CNG Facility Phase 2
Cabin Creek, construct improvements to the TART CNG Fueling Facility
(phase 2).
$300,000 2007
PLA25026 Fleet Air Quality Upgrade
DPW Fleet Air Quality Upgrade - Replace 11 diesel powered vehicles used for
road maintenance activities in the unincorporated area of Placer County. $1,063,000 2006
North of Auburn, SR 49: plant trees, shrubs and groundcover in five
PLA25121 Highway 49 Streetscape Project landscaped medians along Highway 49 just north of Auburn. $647,854 2007
Construct new 2 to 4 lane road from Watt Avenue extension to De La Salle
PLA25128 DE LA SALLE ACCESS RD. University $6,000,000 2006
PLA25130 FIDDYMENT RD. WIDENING
Widen Fiddyment Road from 2 lanes to 4 lanes from Roseville City Limits to
Athens Road $4,000,000 2007
PLA25133
Widening of Foothills Boulevard from the Roseville City Limits north to Sunset
FOOTHILLS BLVD. WIDENING Boulevard $7,000,000 2016
Construct a new 4 lane road extension of Watt Avenue from Baseline Road
PLA25135 WATT AVENUE EXTENSION north to Blue Oaks Blvd. extension. $6,000,000 2006
Placer County Transit
Placer County Transit
Preventive Maintenance & ADA Placer County Transit: perform preventive maintenance on the Placer County
PCT10458 Service
Transit fleet ($245,000 FTA)and provide ADA transit service($180,000 FTA). $682,000 2006
Placer County Transit
Preventive Maintenance & ADA Placer County Transit: Perform preventive maintenance on the Placer County
PCT10469 Service
Transit fleet ($250,000 FTA)& provide ADA transit service ($185,000 FTA). $716,625 2007
Placer County Transit
Preventive Maintenance & ADA Placer County Transit: Perform preventive maintenance on the Placer County
PCT10470 Service
Transit fleet ($255,000 FTA) & provide ADA transit service ($190,000 FTA). $752,500 2008
PCT10473
Placer County - Transit
Operating Assistance FY 05/06 Operation of transit services in non-urbanized areas of Placer County $287,000 2006
PCT10474
Placer County -Transit
Operating Assistance FY 06/07 Operation of transit services in non-urbanized areas of Placer County $312,000 2007
PCT10475
Tahoe Truckee Jobs Access
Reverse Commute Program
In Placer County, Provide JARC operating assistance to Tahoe Area Regional
Transit. $1,320,000 2007
Placer County Transportation Planning Agency
PCT10000 Commuter rail stations Commuter rail stations improvements and maintenance facility $8,000,000 2008
PCT10020 Commuter rail O&M
Annual operating and maintenance cost for regional rail for twoyears; stops in
Placer and Sacramento counties $4,000,000 2008
PCT10230 Placer County
Annual operating and maintenance cost for regional rail for seven years (2010-
2017)
$14,000,000 2017
PLA19080 I-80 Corridor Commuter Rail
I-80 corridor regional rail rolling stock purchase.
$5,000,000 2008
PLA19150 I-80 Corridor Commuter Rail I-80 corridor regional rail track improvements.
$4,000,000 2008
PLA19780 Placer County PPM Plan, program, monitor $490,000 2009
South Placer Regional Transportation Authority
PLA20721,
PLA20723 Placer Parkway
In Placer County, construct new 2 lane roadway between SR 65 and SR 99,
with an extension to Sacramento International Airport and including open
space buffer. $400,000,000 2027
PLA20722 Placer Parkway Phase 2
In Placer County, Placer Parkway from SR 65 to SR 99: widen from 2 to 4
lanes. $118,000,000 2027
Town of Loomis Dept of Public Works
PLA15250 King Road
In Loomis, King Road: add turn lane from Sierra College Boulevard to
Boyington Road. $809,000 2006
PLA15260 Swetzer Road
In Loomis, Swetzer Road: extend 3 lanes from King Road to Sierra College
Boulevard. $3,500,000 2010
PLA15290 Boyington Road
In Loomis, Boyington Road: extend 3 lanes from Horseshoe Bar Road to King
Road. $650,000 2017
PLA15350 Rocklin Road
In Loomis, Rocklin Road from Barton Road to west town limits: widen from 2
to 4 lanes. $1,200,000 2012
PLA15940 Taylor Rd. Widen from 2 to 4 lanes from Horseshoe Bar Rd. to King Rd. $400,000 2010
PLA16350 Horseshoe Bar Rd. @ I-80 Widen overcrossing 2 to 4 lanes and improve ramps. $15,000,000 2010
PLA20510
UPRR Crossing at Sierra
College Blvd. Build over/undercrossing at Sierra College Blvd. at UPRR $30,000,000 2025
PLA20890 Sierra College Boulevard
In Loomis, Sierra College Blvd. from Granite Dr. to north town limits, widen
from 2 to 4 lanes. $3,700,000 2010
Page 8 of 23 4/4/2006

Appendix E
Project List
ID Project Title Project Description Total Cost
Completion
Year
PLA20900
PLA20910
Taylor Road Improvements
Taylor Road
PLA20920 Horseshoe Bar Road
Sacramento County
SAC21431
Arcade Creek Trail
Improvement Project
In Loomis, Taylor Road from south town limits to King Road: add signals at
three intersections, 2500 feet of two-way left turn lanes, bike lanes, sidewalk,
curb, gutter and underground drainage system. See note below. $1,600,000 2008
In Loomis, Taylor Road from King Road to north town limits: add turn lane and
bike lanes. $690,000 2006
In Loomis, Horseshoe Bar Road from Walnut Extension to Taylor Road: add
1,000 feet of two-way left turn lane (for safety) and bike lanes. See note
below. $700,000 2008
Arcade Park District
In Sacramento County, along Arcade Creek and Verde Cruz Creek: install
approx. 2000 linear feet of trail, construct low flow bridge and habitat
interpretive signage. $113,052 2006
Caltrans District 3
CAL16900 Route 99 Add a lane in each direction from I-5 to 70/99 split. $100,000,000 2014
SAC20670 I-5 / I-80 Reconstruct ramp from eastbound to northbound traffic. $18,000,000 2016
Construct HOV lanes and community enhancements on U.S. 50 from
CAL16790 U.S. 50
Downtown Sacramento to Sunrise Boulevard. $195,000,000 2011
CAL17150 SR 99 Landscaping & Irrigation
In Sacramento, SR 99 from 0.2 miles south to 0.2 miles north of Florin Road:
replace plants and upgrade irrigation. $1,631,000 2008
CAL17600 SR 160 Bridge Projects
Near Isleton, SR 160 at Sac. River Bridge, Steamboat Slough and
Paintersville Bridge: construct new control house and walkway. $5,988,000 2006
CAL17800 U.S. 50 at I-5 Construct TOS (Jct. 50 to I-5) $3,000,000 2006
CAL17845 I-5 HOV Lanes In Sacramento County, I-5 from Florin Rd to Downtown: construct HOV lanes. $40,000,000 2014
CAL17850 I-5 Add HOV lanes from downtown Sacramento to I-80 $37,500,000 2013
CAL17850 I-5 Add HOV lanes from I-80 to Sacramento International Airport $112,500,000 2020
CAL17860 I-5 Construct auxiliary lanes on I-5 from Richards Blvd to Garden Hwy $10,000,000 2010
CAL18220 I-80/I-5 Revise existing interchange between I-80 and I-5. $150,000,000 2013
CAL18390 I-5 and U.S. 50 Add High Occupancy Vehicle lane connectors between I-5 and U.S. 50. $50,000,000 2016
CAL18400 Route 99 and U.S. 50 Add High Occupancy Vehicle lane connectors between Route 99 and U.S.50. $50,000,000 2014
CAL18450 I-80 HOV lanes Construct HOV lanes from Longview Drive to I-5. $75,000,000 2013
CAL18737 SR 51, Upgrade Median Barrier
In Sacramento - H Street to Route 160; also on Route 5 (PM 22.4/24.6) -
upgrade median barrier $13,000,000 2009
CAL18738 I-5, Downtown Sac Rehab
In Sacramento - Route 50 to J Street (Boat Section #24-0247M)rehabilitate
structure $60,000,000 2009
CAL18739
I-5, SR-160 to Richards Blvd -
Rehabilitate Pavement In Sacramento - State Route 160 to Richards Blvd - rehabilitate pavement. $16,951,000 2009
SR-51, Howe Ave. to north of
Watt Ave. - replace planting and In Sacramento - Howe Avenue to north of Watt Avenue - replace planting and
CAL18744 upgrade irrigation
upgrade irrigation $2,700,000 2010
In Elk Grove, San Joaquin Rail Corridor, construct platform, shelter,
SAC20370 Elk Grove Intercity Rail Station landscaping and parking for intercity passenger rail station. $800,000 2009
City of Citrus Heights
SAC15030 Antelope Road Widening Widen Antelope Rd from Roseville Rd to I-80 from 4 to 6 lanes $8,820,000 2008
SAC15300 Greenback Lane Widening Widen Greenback Lane from Auburn Blvd to Dewey Dr from 4 to 6 lanes $11,780,000 2008
SAC16880 Old Auburn Road Widening
Widen Old Auburn Rd from Fair Oak Blvd. to northern City Limits from 2 to 3
lanes with class 1 bikelane $8,730,000 2006
SAC16910 Sunrise Blvd.
Widen Sunrise Blvd. from 4 to 6 lanes including a raised median from
Antelope Rd. to Placer County. $8,830,000 2024
SAC16920 Sunrise Blvd.
Widen Sunrise Blvd. from 4 to 6 lanes including raised median from Oak Ave.
to Antelope Rd. $11,710,000 2012
SAC19000 Antelope Road Enhancements
In Citrus Heights, Antelope Rd from I-80 to Auburn Blvd: construction of
sidewalks, Class 2 Bike lanes, sound walls, landscaping and installation of new
traffic signals. $8,880,000 2010
SAC22440 Sunrise Boulevard
Widen Sunrise Blvd. from 4 to 6 lanes, Arcada Dr. to Oak Ave., including bike
lanes, landscaping, and pedestrian facilities. $11,492,000 2018
SAC22470 Auburn Blvd Enhancements
From Sylvan Rd. to Antelope Rd.construct Class II Bikeways, sidewalks and
landscaping. $6,485,000 2009
City of Elk Grove
SAC15660 Sheldon Road Widening
In Elk Grove, Sheldon Road from Bruceville Rd. to SR 99 and from East
Stockton Blvd. to Elk Grove-Florin Rd.: widen from 2 to 4 lanes. $12,158,500 2006
SAC19010 Bruceville Road Widening
In Elk Grove, Bruceville Road from Whitelock Parkway to Bilby Road: widen
from 2 to 4 lanes. $3,700,000 2006
SAC19020 Bond Road Widening
In Elk Grove, Bond Road from Waterman Road to Bradshaw Road: widen
from 2 to 4 lanes. $6,129,000 2006
SAC19100 Bruceville Road Widening
In Elk Grove, Bruceville Road from Poppy Ridge Road to Elk Grove
Boulevard: widen from 2 to 4 lanes. $5,379,000 2006
SAC19160 Sheldon Road Widening
In Elk Grove, Sheldon Road from Elk Grove-Florin Road to Waterman Road:
widen from 2 to 4 lanes. $8,240,000 2007
Sheldon Road at State Route
SAC19380 99 Reconstruct Sheldon Road interchange on State Route 99. $52,623,000 2008
Page 9 of 23 4/4/2006

Appendix E
Project List
ID Project Title Project Description Total Cost
Completion
Year
SAC19780
East Stockton Blvd Bike/Ped
Improvements
In Elk Grove, East Stockton Blvd. from Calvine Rd. to Elk Grove-Florin Rd.:
construct class 1 & 2 bikeways, sidewalks, and pedestrian traffic signals. $698,400 2006
SAC20250
West Stockton Blvd./Laguna
Creek Bridge
In Elk Grove, West Stockton at Laguna Creek, west of SR 99 between
Sheldon Rd. and Laguna Blvd.: replace existing bridge with a new structure to
provide 2 traffic lanes, an access lane, shoulders and a raised sidewalk on
west side of bridge $3,348,000 2006
In Elk Grove, Big Horn Boulevard from Whitelock Parkway to Elk Grove
SAC20280 Big Horn Boulevard Extension Boulevard: construct new four lane roadway. $7,050,000 2006
SAC20290 Franklin Boulevard Widening
In Elk Grove, Franklin Boulevard from Poppy Ridge Road to Elk Grove
Boulevard: widen from 2 to 6 lanes. $5,055,000 2006
SAC20320 Whitelock Parkway Extension
In Elk Grove, construct new four lane roadway from Bruceville Road to West
Stockton Blvd. $10,118,000 2006
SAC20340 Willard Parkway Extension
In Elk Grove, Willard Parkway from Bilby Road to Kammerer Road: construct
new four lane roadway. $15,000,000 2009
SAC20520 SR 99 at Grantline Road In Elk Grove, SR 99 at Grantline Road: reconstruct interchange. $57,680,000 2007
Elk Grove Transit Preventive
SAC24060 Maintenance In Elk Grove, preventive maintenance for Elk Grove transit operations. $375,000 2007
In Elk Grove, Bradshaw Road from Sheldon Road to Calvine Road: widen
SAC24073 Bradshaw Road Widening from 2 to 4 lanes. $3,500,000 2009
SAC24077 Bruceville Road Widening
In Elk Grove, Bruceville Road from Sheldon Road to Big Horn Blvd: widen
from 4 to 6 lanes. $740,000 2009
SAC24087 Willard Parkway Widening
In Elk Grove, Willard Parkway from Poppy Ridge Road to Bilby Road: widen
from 4 to 6 lanes. $4,100,000 2009
SAC24090 Grant Line Road Widening
In Elk Grove, Grant Line Road from Bradshaw Road to Bond Road: widen
form 2 to 4 lanes. $8,000,000 2009
SAC24092 Kammerer Road Widening
In Elk Grove, Kammerer Road from SR 99 to 6000' west of SR 99: widen from
6 to 8 lanes. $4,400,000 2010
SAC24094 Kammerer Road Extension
SAC24097 Waterman Road Widening
SAC24099 Big Horn Boulevard Extension
SAC24101 Bond Road Widening
SAC24102 Bradshaw Road Widening
SAC24103 Bradshaw Road Widening
SAC24104 Bruceville Road Widening
SAC24105 Bruceville Road Widening
SAC24106 Elk Grove Blvd Widening
SAC24108 Laguna Springs Drive Extension
SAC24109 Lotz Parkway
SAC24110 Lotz Parkway
SAC24111 Lotz Parkway
SAC24112 Waterman Road Widening
SAC24113 Kammerer Road Widening
SAC24114 Kammerer Road Widening
SAC24116
SR 99 at Elk Grove Blvd N-
bound On-Ramp
SAC24117 West Stockton Blvd Widening
In Elk Grove, from Bruceville Road to I-5 (at Hood Franklin Road): construct
new 4 lane roadway, modifying the I-5/Hood Franklin Road interchange, and
construction of a railroad overcrossing at UP railroad tracks. $35,617,500 2010
In Elk Grove, Waterman Road from Bond Road to Elk Grove Blvd: widen from
2 to 4 lanes. $6,600,000 2009
In Elk Grove, construct new four lane roadway from Whitelock Parkway to
Kammerer Road. $9,850,000 2007
In Elk Grove, Bond Road from Bradshaw Road to Grant Line Road: widen
from 2 to 4 lanes. $10,191,500 2008
In Elk Grove, Bradshaw Road from Bond Road to Sheldon Road: widen from 2
to 4 lanes. $3,052,000 2007
In Elk Grove, Bradshaw Road from Grant Line Road to Bond Road: widen
from 2 to 4 lanes. $10,491,500 2008
In Elk Grove, Bruceville Road from Laguna Blvd to Elk Grove Blvd: widen from
4 to 6 lanes. $475,000 2006
In Elk Grove, Bruceville Road from Bilby Road to Kammerer Road: widen from
2 to 4 lanes. $3,750,000 2008
In Elk Grove, Elk Grove Blvd from UPRR to Franklin Blvd: widen from 5 to 6
lanes. $505,500 2006
In Elk Grove, Laguna Springs Drive from Elk Grove Blvd to Lotz Parkway:
construct new 4 lane roadway. $3,100,000 2007
In Elk Grove, construct new four lane roadway from Big Horn Blvd to Laguna
Springs Drive. $1,850,000 2007
In Elk Grove, construct new four lane roadway from Laguna Springs Drive to
Whitelock Parkway $3,700,000 2006
In Elk Grove, construct new four lane roadway from Whitelock Parkway to
Kammerer Road. $12,000,000 2008
In Elk Grove, Waterman Road from Elk Grove Blvd to Grant Line Road: widen
from 2 to 4 lanes. $11,600,000 2008
In Elk Grove, Kammerer Road from SR 99 to 6000' west of SR 99: widen from
2 to 6 lanes. $7,500,000 2008
In Elk Grove, Kammerer Road from 6000' west of SR 99 to Bruceville Road:
widen from 2 to 4 lanes. $7,000,000 2008
In Elk Grove, SR 99 at Elk Grove Blvd: add northbound loop on-ramp, remove
traffic signal at existing northbound on-ramp and add second westbound left
turn lane to existing southbound on-ramp. $5,000,000 2007
In Elk Grove, West Stockton Blvd from Kammerer road to 6000' north: widen
from 2 to 6 lanes. $9,600,000 2007
SAC24118 Grant Line Road Widening
SAC24119 Grant Line Road Widening
SAC24120 Sheldon Road Widening
In Elk Grove, Grant Line Road from East Stockton Blvd to Waterman Road:
widen from 2 to 6 lanes, including grade separation over the UPRR tracks. $15,200,000 2007
In Elk Grove, Grant Line Road from Waterman Road to Bradshaw Road:
widen from 2 to 4 lanes. $10,300,000 2007
In Elk Grove, Sheldon Road from Waterman to Bradshaw: widen from 2 to 4
lanes $8,240,000 2007
City of Folsom Dept of Public Works
Page 10 of 23 4/4/2006

Appendix E
Project List
ID Project Title Project Description Total Cost
Completion
Year
SAC18400 East Bidwell Street
In Folsom, East Bidwell Street from Oak Avenue Parkway to Blue Ravine
Road: widen to six lanes. $1,100,000 2010
SAC19880 U.S. 50 at Oak Ave. Construct 4 lane interchange for newly extended Oak Av. $20,000,000 2012
SAC19890 US 50 at Empire Ranch Road
Construct 4 lane interchange with US 50 at extension of Empire Ranch Road
(formerly Russell Ranch Rd.). $23,701,000 2010
Folsom Historic District Park n
SAC20220 Ride Lot In Folsom historic district, construct park and ride lot. $555,000 2009
In Historic Folsom, NW corner of the Railroad Block redevelopment propoerty
at the Leidesdorf Street and proposed Reading Street: development of a multimodal
transit center to serve Sacramento Regional Transit District's Historic
SAC20570 Folsom Railroad Block District light rail station. $5,661,203 2007
SAC21210 Iron Point Road
In Folsom, Iron Point Road from Black Diamond Drive to East Bidwell Street:
widen to six lanes. $8,000,000 2010
SAC21250 Blue Ravine Rd.
Widen WB approach to Folsom Blvd. to provide dual left-turn lanes and
exclusive through and right-turn lanes. $1,200,000 2008
SAC21270 Sibley Street
In Folsom, Sibley Street from Glenn Drive to Blue Ravine Road: widen to 4
lanes. $1,500,000 2009
SAC21280 Green Valley Road
In Folsom, Green Valley Road from East Natoma to Sacramento/El Dorado
County line: widen from 2 to 4 lanes. $3,000,000 2011
SAC22280 Oak Avenue Parkway
In Folsom, Oak Avenue Parkway from Folsom-Auburn Road to Baldwin Dam
Road: widen to 4/6 lanes. $3,300,000 2015
SAC22340 American River Bridge
In Folsom, construct crossing of the American River below Folsom Dam with
approach. $110,000,000 2008
Folsom Transit Preventive
SAC24061 Maintenance In Folsom, perform preventive maintenance for Folsom Stage Lines. $856,250 2007
In Folsom, construct Intelligent Transportation Systems infrastructure at
SAC24063 Folsom ITS Project
various loactions within the City. $4,200,000 2015
Glenn Drive Light Rail Station
Transit Oriented Development
In Folsom, Glenn Drive Light Rail Station: conduct strategic planning to
develop light rail station into a transit-oriented development, including a
marketing/implementation plan for coordination activities, public outreach and
SAC24067 Master Plan
partnership opportunities. $165,000 2007
In Folsom, East Natoma Street from Fargo Street to Blue Ravine Road: widen
SAC22060 East Natoma Street
to 4 lanes. $2,120,000 2008
City of Galt Dept of Public Works
SAC17180 Carillion Boulevard Extension
In Galt, Carillion Boulevard from Simmerhorn Road to Crystal Way: construct
new road. $2,500,000 2006
SAC17190 Elm/Amador Intersection
In Galt, intersection of Elm and Amador Avenues: reconstruct and realign
intersection to eliminate hazard. $800,000 2006
SAC17200 Simmerhorn Road Extension
In Galt, Simmerhorn Road: construct new road to extend from existing
terminus to Carol Drive and Amador Avenue. $2,800,000 2007
SAC17210 F Street/New Hope Connector
In Galt: F Street and New Hope Road: realign intersection of roadways to
connect major east-west arterial. $1,100,000 2007
SAC19750 Lincoln Way Reconstruct Lincoln Way from Southdale to South Sacramento County line. $3,000,000 2006
SAC20580 Central Galt Interchange
In Galt, A & C Streets, Boessow Road at SR 99: replace/reconstruct
interchange and widen overpass to 4 lanes with bike lanes. $26,420,000 2010
SAC20590 Twin Cities Road
In Galt, SR 99 at Twin Cities Road, widen Twin Cities Road overpass to 4
lanes with addition of bikelanes. $10,000,000 2015
City of Rancho Cordova
Folsom Boulevard
Project development to Install landscaping and streetscaping on Folsom Blvd.
SAC21470 Enhancements
between Rod Beaudry Dr. and Sunrise Blvd. $3,405,000 2007
In Sacramento County, Folsom Boulevard from Mather Field Road to Coloma
SAC15250 Folsom Boulevard Widening Road: widen from 4 to 6 lanes. $5,000,000 2012
SAC22420 Douglas Road Widening
In Sacramento County, Douglas Road from Sunrise Boulevard to Grant Line
Road, widen from 2 to 4 lanes. $6,320,000 2007
US 50 at Mather Field Rd
Design, install, and maintain landscape improvements within the existing
freeway interchange of US 50 at Mather Field Road. Includes streetscape,
lighting, and other enhancements on Mather Field Rd between Folsom and
SAC22180 Interchange
Mather Commerce Center. $1,600,000 2006
In Rancho Cordova, Folsom Boulevard at La Loma Drive: develop a "city
center" across the street from existing light rail station. Replace street
frontage to include a cafe sidewalk and parallel street parking and construct a
SAC24064 Rancho Cordova City Center two-level parking garage. $2,190,621 2006
City of Sacramento Dept. of Transportation
CAL16900 Route 99 Add a lane in each direction from I-5 to Elkhorn Blvd. $1,733,000 2024
SAC24154 5th St. Extension Extend 5th Street from H Street to Gateway Blvd. $30,000,000 2010
SAC24155 West Side Access Extend 3rd Street from I Street to Depot. $8,000,000 2010
SAC15930 Cosumnes River Blvd. Widen Cosumnes River Blvd. to 4 lanes from Franklin Blvd. to Center Pkwy. $10,000,000 2014
SAC16000 Exposition Blvd. Construct split-diamond interchange at Route 160 $35,000,000 2023
SAC16010 Florin-Perkins Rd. Widen Florin-Perkins Rd. to 6 lanes from Folsom Blvd. to Fruitridge Rd. $12,000,000 2020
SAC16040 Route 16
Realign Jackson Rd. as a 4 lane roadway from Power Inn Road to South Watt
Avenue. $18,000,000 2018
Page 11 of 23 4/4/2006

Appendix E
Project List
ID Project Title Project Description Total Cost
Completion
Year
SAC16060 Northgate Blvd.
In Sacramento, construct operational improvements at the Arden Garden /
Northgate Blvd. inersection. $5,000,000 2006
SAC16070 Power Inn Rd. Widen Power Inn Rd. to 6 lanes from Fruitridge Rd. to 14th. $25,000,000 2018
SAC16092 Richards Boulevard Widening
Widen Richards Blvd from north 7th St to North 12th St from 2 to 5 lanes with
bikelanes $3,630,000 2006
SAC16130 West El Camino Widening
In Sacramento, West El Camino Avenue, I-80 to Natomas Main Drainage
Canal: widen from 4 to 6 lanes and add bike lanes. $6,000,000 2025
West El Camino Bridge In Sacramento, West El Camino Avenue between American Avenue and
SAC16140 Replacement
Western Avenue: replace existing structurally deficient bridge. $7,680,000 2008
In Sacramento, Bruceville Road from Sheldon Road. to Cosumnes River Blvd:
SAC17590 Bruceville Road
widen from 2 to 4 lanes. $10,000,000 2006
SAC17620 Garden Highway
Widen to 4 lanes from the western terminus of the Arden Garden Connector to
300 feet east of I-5 ramps. $35,000,000 2025
13th and 16th Street Light Rail
Station Connectivity
Construct improved pedestrian access, lighting and signage around the 13th
SAC17784 Improvements
and 16th Street light rail stations. $885,000 2007
SAC17785
Swanston Station Transit
Village Planning
Tower Bridge Sidewalk
SAC17990 Widening
R Street Bicycle/Pedestrian
SAC18000 Bridge
SAC18170
I-5 @ Richards Blvd
interchange
In Sacramento, Swanston Light Rail Station: perform pre-development
planning to identify circulation, drainage and utility infrastructure
improvements necessary to support transit-oriented development in the area. $665,000 2008
In Sacramento, Tower Bridge: construct a wider pedestrian and bike path
across the Sacramento River. City of Sacramento and City of West
Sacramento joint project. $9,400,000 2007
In Sacramento, R Street Bridge at I-5: convert former railroad bridge to bicycle
and pedestrian use. $496,000 2007
Widen Richards Blvd from 5 to 8 lanes and improve I-5 ramps through the
interchange; reconstruct the intersections at Jibboom St. and Bercut Dr. to
improve capacity $45,000,000 2014
In Sacramento, project definition, feasibility & pre-environmental studies for I-
5/Richards I/C, Railyards Access Rd., 7th St. Widening, Gateway Blvd. Ext. to
SR 160, Richards Blvd. widening, 6th St. Ext., SR 160/ Richards I/C, and
12th/16th NB Intersection. $5,916,700 2006
SAC18250 North CBD Access Study
SAC18360 7th St. Widen 7th St. from 2 to 4 lanes from Richards to Vine St. $4,600,000 2011
Extend Consumnes River Boulevard from Franklin to Freeport with an
SAC18380 I-5 at Cosumnes River Blvd. interchange at I-5 $80,000,000 2009
Extend East Commerce Way from planned Club Center Dr. to Elkhorn Blvd.
SAC18440 East Commerce Way
as a 4 lane road. $3,000,000 2008
In Sacramento, East Commerce Way from planned Club Center Drive to Del
SAC18460 East Commerce Way
Paso Rd: extend as a 6-lane facility. $3,831,000 2008
SAC18470 East Commerce Way In Sacramento, East Commerce Way, from Del Paso to Arena: widen 4 to 6 lan $4,000,000 2019
Widen Elkhorn Blvd. to 4 lanes from Route 99 east to the City limits (related
SAC18500 Elkhorn Blvd.
interchange widening listed under Route 99) $11,367,000 2010
In Sacramento, Elkhorn Boulevard from SR 99 to east city limits: widen from 4
SAC18510 Elkhorn Boulevard
to 6 lanes. $7,000,000 2015
SAC18540 Gateway Park Drive Widen Gateway Park Dr. to 4 lanes from Del Paso Rd. to Arena Blvd. $3,000,000 2009
Build new Natomas Crossing Drive as 4 lane road from I-5 westward to El
SAC18560 Natomas Crossing Drive Centro Rd. $3,646,000 2016
Extend East Commerce Way from Arena Blvd. to the planned Natomas
SAC18570 East Commerce Way
Crossing Drive as a 6 lane road. $3,217,000 2008
Extend East Commerce Way from planned Natomas Crossing Drive to San
SAC18580 East Commerce Way
Juan Rd. as a 4 lane road. $1,890,000 2010
Construct Snowey Egret Way south of Del Paso Rd. from El Centro Rd. to
SAC18600 Snowey Egret Way
Commerce Way as a 4 lane road $2,237,000 2021
SAC18610 El Centro Rd. Widen El Centro Rd. from 2 to 4 lanes from Del Paso Rd. to Arena Blvd. $3,390,000 2008
I-80 @ West El Camino
SAC18650 Interchange Expand the West El Camino interchange on I-80 to 4 lanes and modify ramps. $20,000,000 2012
Sacramento, I-5 between Del Paso Rd. to Route 99; add a northbound
SAC18660 I-5 road widening
auxilary lane $714,000 2012
Add a second SB on-ramp lane from Route 99 to I-5 at the I-5/Route 99
SAC18670 I-5 @ Route 99 Interchange interchane. $216,000 2012
SR 99 Elkhorn Boulevard Expand the Elkhorn Blvd. interchange on Route 99 to accommodate the
SAC18690 Interchange
widening of Elkhorn Blvd. from 2 to 6 lanes $2,762,000 2015
Extend the existing westbound off-ramp onto Northgate Blvd. for safety
SAC18700 I-80 @ Northgate Blvd. reasons, add auxiliary lane to westbound on-ramp. $10,000,000 2015
Construct Snowey Egret Way overcrossing of I-5 for the planned Snowey
Egret Way that will run east-west from El Centro Rd. to Commerce Way
SAC18710 Snowey Egret Way at I-5 crossing over I-5. $2,580,000 2022
SAC18720 Natomas Crossing Drive Construct Natomas Crossing Drive overcrossing of I-5. $1,597,000 2016
SAC18740 El Centro Rd. Extend El Centro Rd. northeasterly over I-5 and east to East Commerce Way. $2,167,000 2020
CSUS Bike/Pedestrian Access
SAC19250 Project Sacramento - Provide improved bicycle and pedestrian access near CSUS $3,724,000 2006
SAC19550 Raley Blvd. Widen Raley Blvd. to 4 lanes from Santa Ana Ave to Ascot Ave. $25,000,000 2015
Arden Way/SR 51 Interchange Arden Way underpass improvements to remove restriction caused by columns
SAC19560 Improvements
and widen to 6 lanes. $19,500,000 2024
Page 12 of 23 4/4/2006

Appendix E
Project List
ID Project Title Project Description Total Cost
Completion
Year
SAC20000 Route 51 @ Exposition Blvd. Add EB on-ramps at Exposition Blvd. $15,000,000 2024
Sacramento Intermodal In Sacramento, develop intermodal transportation terminal for heavy rail, light
SAC20350 Terminal
rail and bus service. $225,000,000 2012
SAC20720 Ueda Parkway Bikeway
SAC20761 Traffic Operations Center
SAC20762 Traffic Operation Center
SAC20763 Traffic Operation Center
SAC20764 Traffic Operation Center
SAC20780 Ramona Ave
SAC20820 Power Inn Road Widening
SAC21540 SR 160 at Northgate
Construct bike trail on the west side of the levee of the Natomas East Main
Drain from Arden Garden to Elkhorn, Arcade Creek and Dry Creek trails. $2,595,100 2007
In Sacramento, connect 100 traffic signals, including ITS technology that are
located outside of the Central City to the City's existing TOC. $8,500,000 2007
Connect 100 traffic signals, including ITS technology, that are located outside
of the Central City to the City's existing TOC. $9,900,000 2010
Connect 100 traffic signals, including ITS technology, that are located outside
of the Central City to the City's existing TOC. $11,100,000 2015
Connect 100 traffic signals, including ITS technology, that are located outside
of the Central City to the City's existing TOC. $10,000,000 2020
Extends two-lane roadway and center turn lane from to Folsom Blvd with bike
lanes. $7,000,000 2011
Widen Power Inn Rd from Folsom Blvd to 14th Ave from 4 to 6 lanes with
expanded intersection along Power Inn Rd from Folsom Blvd to 14th Ave $6,635,000 2006
In Sacramento, SR 160 at Northgate Interchange: add an eastbound on-ramp
and a westbound off-ramp. $22,000,000 2015
SAC22080 Gateway Park Boulevard Widen Gateway Park Blvd from Truxel Road to Arena Blvd. from 2 to 4 lanes $1,800,000 2006
SAC22170 North B St Reconstruction
In Sacramento, North B Street from North 7th to North 12th: reconstruct street
including curb, gutter, sidewalk and associated drainage work. $3,300,000 2006
Bridge Road Bridge
SAC22210 Replacement Replace Bridge Road bridge over Arcade Creek $1,330,000 2006
SAC22220
Main Avenue Bridge
Replacement
In Sacramento, Main Ave. Bridge over Natomas east Main Drain: replace
existing 2-lane bridge with a 4-lane bridge. $24,000,000 2007
SAC22460 Pavement Rehabilitation In Sacramento, various streets: rehabilitate pavement. $2,106,600 2006
SAC22530 Bridging I-5
Construct connection over I-5 between river esplanade and Crocker District,
Capitol Ave. to "O" St. $250,000,000 2015
SAC22580 Arden Way
Improve Arden Fair Mall roadways, including realigning access road,
intersections and signals. $4,100,000 2009
SAC22610 Folsom Boulevard Widen Folsom Blvd. to 4 lanes, Hornet Dr. to 65th St. $39,000,000 2011
SAC22620 I-80 Bike/Ped Bridge
Construct bike/pedestrian bridge across I-80 at the West Canal, as well as
across the West Canal. $850,300 2008
SAC22630 65th Street Improvements
In Sacramento, east side of 65th Street from Lemon Hill to Fruitridge:
construct sidewalk, curb, gutter and bike lanes. $1,505,000 2006
In Sacramento, 65th Street from 14th Ave. to south city limits: construct
sidewalks, curb, gutter, planter strips, street lights and storm drain
SAC22640 65th Street Pedestrian Facilities modifications. $13,000,000 2011
In Sacramento, realign Sutterville Bypass/23rd St.and Sutterville Rd. and
SAC22650 Sutterville Road and 23rd Street install new traffic signal. $2,000,000 2006
SAC22660 SR 160 at Richards In Sacramento, SR 160 at Richards Boulevard: install signalized intersection. $3,200,000 2007
65th St. Bike and Pedestrian Feasibility study to investigate providing bike and pedestrian improvements
SAC22680 Improvements
through the Highway 50 and 65th Street Interchange. $165,000 2006
SAC22790 4th Avenue Extend 4th Ave. from 65th St. to Ramona Ave. $25,000,000 2022
SAC22800 6th Street Extension Extend 6th St. between Richards Blvd. and H St. $47,000,000 2011
SAC22810 7th Street Widen 7th St. to 4 lanes from E St. to Richards Blvd. $25,000,000 2011
SAC22840 Bell Ave. Widen Bell Ave. from 2 to 4 lanes from Norwood Ave. to Raley Blvd. $20,000,000 2021
SAC22850 Bell Avenue Widen Bell Ave. from 2 to 4 lanes from Raley Blvd. to Winters St. $12,000,000 2015
SAC22870 Del Paso Road Widen Del Paso Road overcrossing of I-5 to 6 lanes. $1,700,000 2012
SAC22880 Del Paso Road Widen Del Paso Road from 4 to 6 lanes from El Centro to I-5. $400,000 2010
SAC22890 ITS on Arden Way Smart Corridor on Arden Way from Del Paso to Watt Ave. $2,418,000 2006
SAC22891 ITS on Arden Way Operating and Maintenance for Arden Way Smart Corridor from 2010 to 2025. $2,100,000 2015
SAC23320 Del Paso Road Widen Del Paso Road from 4 to 6 lanes from Truxel Rd. to east city limits. $3,361,000 2020
SAC23330 El Centro Road Widen to 4 lanes from Arena Blvd.to San Juan Road $4,200,000 2012
SAC23370 Fruitridge Road Widen Fruitridge Rd. to 6 lanes from Forin Perkins Rd. to S. Watt Ave. $8,000,000 2017
SAC23380 G St. Extension Extend G St. from 7th to 5 th St. (2 lanes) $1,000,000 2011
SAC23390 Gateway Blvd.
Construct a new road from the Railyards Access Road to N. 12th St.;
intersection improvements at 12th and North B St. and connection to 12th and
16th Streets. $30,000,000 2012
SAC23400 I-5 @ West El Camino
Construct a northbound entrance ramp and southbound exit ramp at W. El
Camino Ave./I-5 interchange. Modify the NB I-5 to I-80 ramp to accommodate
the proposed interchange ramps $25,000,000 2020
SAC23410 Kiefer Boulevard Widen Kiefer from 2 to 4 lanes between Florin-Perkins Rd. to S. Watt Ave. $4,000,000 2020
SAC23430 Main Avenue Widen Main Ave. from 2 to 4 lanes from Norwood Ave. to Rio Linda Blvd. $7,000,000 2018
SAC23440 Mangan Park
Bike trail south of Mangan Park in Executive Airport right-of-way from 24th
Street to Freeport Blvd - 0.6 mile $300,000 2010
SAC23460 Natomas Boulevard Widen Natomas Blvd. To 6 lanes from North Park Drive to Del Paso Road $2,060,000 2008
SAC23470 Natomas Boulevard Widen Natomas Blvd. From 2 to 6 lanes from Club Center Dr. to North Park Dri $1,099,000 2012
Page 13 of 23 4/4/2006

Appendix E
Project List
ID Project Title Project Description Total Cost
Completion
Year
SAC23480 Natomas Boulevard Widen Natomas Blvd. From 2 to 4 lanes from Elkhorn Blvd. To Club Center Dr. $2,805,000 2015
SAC23520 Railyards Access Road
Jibboom St. improvements between Richards Blvd. and the railyards site to
provide access to the site from the north. $15,000,000 2012
SAC23530 Roseville Road
Widen Roseville Rd. from 2 to 4 lanes from Connie Dr. to Sacramento City
limits $4,000,000 2021
SAC23540 S. Watt Widening Widen S. Watt Ave. to 6 lanes between Elder Creek Road and Fruitridge Rd. $20,000,000 2020
SAC23560 Silver Eagle Road Widen Silver Eagle Rd. to 3 lanes between Norwood Ave. and Mabel Ave. $2,000,000 2015
SAC23630 65th St. Widening In Sacramento, 65th St. from Hwy. 50 to Broadway: widen to 6 lanes. $4,000,000 2025
SAC23650 Bruceville Rd. Widening
In Sacramento, on Bruceville Road: Between Sheldon Road and Consumnes
River Blvd; widen to 6 lanes $8,000,000 2014
SAC23680 Elder Creek Rd widening
In Sacramento on Elder Creek Rd.: between Florin Perkins to South Watt
Ave.; widen to four lanes $7,000,000 2019
SAC23690 Elder Creek Rd. widening
In Sacramento, Elder Creek Rd. between Power Inn and Florin Perkins Rd;
widen to 4 lanes $6,000,000 2023
SAC23770 I-5 Natomas Bike Trails North Natomas, on both sides of I-5; bike trail system - 7.0 miles $1,500,000 2009
SR 99 Meister Way
Sacramento, at Hwy 99, south of Elkhorn Blvd: Meister Way freeway
SAC23810 overcrossing
overcrossing $1,006,000 2012
Sacramento, on Northgate Blvd.: from Route 160 to Garden Highway; widen
SAC23820 Northgate Boulevard Widening to 4 lanes $12,000,000 2015
SAC23840 Richards Boulevard Widening Sacramento, Richards Blvd.: from SR 160 to Bercut Drive; widen to 6 lanes. $20,000,000 2014
SAC23850 South Watt Avenue Widening
Sacramento, South Watt Ave.: from Jackson Rd. to Elder Creek; Widen to 4
lanes $10,000,000 2012
SAC23860 South Watt Avenue Widening
Sacramento, South Watt Ave.: from Fruitridge Rd. to Folsom Blvd.; widen to
6 lanes $10,000,000 2025
SAC23890 Sutter Landing Bridge
Sacramento, Sutter Landing Bridge, between American River Parkway and
Sutter Landing Park; bike/ped bridge over American River $5,000,000 2010
SAC24065
Broadway/Martin Luther King Jr. In Sacramento, Broadway at Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard: construct
Intersection Enhancement
Project
improved curb, gutters and sidewalk, higher visibility crosswalks, accessibility
ramps, replace signals and implement traffic calming measures. $685,000 2007
SAC24068
Docks Area Redevelopment
Project
SAC18660 I-5 road widening
SAC18670 I-5 @ Route 99 Interchange
SAC18690
SR 99 Elkhorn Boulevard
Interchange
SAC18700 I-80 @ Northgate Blvd.
SAC18710 Snowey Egret Way at I-5
In Sacramento, north of Broadway along the Sacramento River: perform
planning for the redevelopment of the Docks Area, including circulation plan,
infrastructure assessment, financing plan, and related environmental review. $680,000 2008
Sacramento, I-5 between Del Paso Rd. to Route 99; add a northbound
auxilary lane $714,000 2008
Add a second SB on-ramp lane from Route 99 to I-5 at the I-5/Route 99
interchane. $216,000 2010
Expand the Elkhorn Blvd. interchange on Route 99 to accommodate the
widening of Elkhorn Blvd. from 2 to 6 lanes $2,762,000 2015
Extend the existing westbound off-ramp onto Northgate Blvd. for safety
reasons, add auxiliary lane to westbound on-ramp. $10,000,000 2015
Construct Snowey Egret Way overcrossing of I-5 for the planned Snowey
Egret Way that will run east-west from El Centro Rd. to Commerce Way
crossing over I-5. $2,580,000 2022
SAC20000 Route 51 @ Exposition Blvd. Add EB on-ramps at Exposition Blvd. $15,000,000 2015
SAC20670 I-5 / I-80 Reconstruct ramp from eastbound to northbound traffic. $18,000,000 2015
SAC21540 SR 160 at Northgate
SAC20811 Jed Smith
CAL18748
Bloom Ranch Entrance Road
and Parking Lot Pavement
Rehab
In Sacramento, SR 160 at Northgate Interchange: add an eastbound on-ramp
and a westbound off-ramp. $22,000,000 2015
CSUS
Realign and extend Jed Smith as a 2-lane connection between CSUS and
Folsom Blvd. $4,000,000 2010
Federal Highway Administration
In Sacramento County, Bloom Ranch Entrance Road and Parking Lots:
rehabilitate pavement. $385,000 2007
Sacramento County Dept of Transportation
Widen from South Watt Ave. to Excelsior Rd. from 2 to 4 lanes and add
continuous left turn lane. $6,000,000 2010
CAL15410 Route 16
SR 99 Elverta Road
CAL15510 Interchange Elverta Rd. Interchange $17,800,000 2014
Elk Grove-Florin Road In Sacramento County, Elk Grove-Florin Road from Gerber Road to Florin
SAC15170 Widening
Road: widen from 2 to 4 lanes. $6,372,000 2008
Page 14 of 23 4/4/2006

Appendix E
Project List
ID Project Title Project Description Total Cost
SAC15180 Elkhorn Boulevard Widening
Left-Turn Lanes - Various
SAC15200 Locations
SAC15230 Elkhorn Blvd. Widening
SAC15370 Hazel Avenue
SAC15380 Hazel Avenue
SAC15390 Hazel Avenue
Completion
Year
In Sacramento County, Elkhorn Boulevard from Rio Linda Boulevard to SR 99:
widen from 2 to 4 lanes, including bridge over Natomas east main drain,
landscaping, new RR crossing and bike/ped facilities. $14,000,000 2013
In Sacramento County, various locations, installation of left turn lanes in
accordance with the county DOT's Project Priority List. $705,000 2008
In Sacramento County, Elkhorn Blvd. from Watt Ave. to Don Julio Blvd.: widen
from 4 to 6 lanes. $9,363,000 2010
In Sacramento County, Hazel Avenue from Madison Avenue to US 50: add
carpool and transit capacity. $30,000,000 2019
In Sacramento County, Hazel Avenue at Gold River Road: add grade
separation, ramps and frontage connections. $20,000,000 2018
In Sacramento County, Hazel Avenue at Greenback Lane: add undercrossing,
turn ramps and community enhancements. $20,000,000 2021
In Sacramento County, Hazel Avenue at Madison Avenue: improve
intersection. $20,000,000 2017
SAC15400 Hazel Avenue
SAC15720 Watt Avenue Widening Widen Watt Ave from Elkhorn Blvd to Antelope Rd from 4 to 6 lanes $1,610,000 2014
SAC15750 Watt Ave. Widen from Don Julio Blvd. to Elkhorn Blvd. from 4 to 6 lanes. $2,674,000 2014
SAC16500 Madison Avenue Widening Widen Madison Avenue from Sunrise Blvd. to Hazel Ave. from 4 to 6 lanes $17,000,000 2010
SAC16510 Madison Avenue Widening
In Sacramento County, Madison Avenue from Hazel Avenue to Greenback
Lane: widen from 4 to 6 lanes. $17,800,000 2014
SAC16800 Fair Oaks Boulevard Widening
Widen Fair Oaks Blvd from Marconi Ave. to Engle Rd. from 4 to 6 lanes
including signal modifications at Marconi, Stanley, Grant, and Engle Rd. $9,800,000 2010
Metro Air Parkway Interchange Construct new interchange on I-5 at Metro Air Parkway near Sacramento
SAC18150 at I-5
International Airport $10,883,398 2008
In Sacramento County, Metro Air Parkway from I-5 to Elverta Road: construct
SAC18160 Metro Air Parkway
new road to 4 lanes. $6,500,000 2006
SAC19040 Calvine Road Widening
In Sacramento County, Calvine Road from 1000 feet east of Kingsbridge Drive
to Vineyard Road, widen from 2 to 4 lanes. $14,218,000 2007
SAC19060 Don Julio Blvd. Widen from Antelope Rd. to North Loop Blvd. from 2 to 4 lanes $759,000 2009
SAC19090 Greenback Lane Widening Widen Greenback Lane from Sunrise to Hazel Ave from 4 to 6 lanes $25,140,000 2011
SAC19170 South Watt Avenue Widening
Widen South Watt Avenue from Alderson Ave to Route 16 from 2 to 4 lanes
with left turn lanes $3,975,000 2007
SAC19290 South Watt Avenue Widening Widen South Watt Avenue from Florin Rd. to Route 16 from 2 to 4 lanes $10,451,000 2009
SAC19310 Bradshaw Rd. Widen from Calvine Rd. to Florin Rd. from 2 lanes to 4 lanes $15,338,148 2008
SAC19320 Bradshaw Road Widening Widen Bradshaw Rd from Florin to Morrison Creek from 2 to 4 lanes $13,830,000 2007
SAC19340 Grantline Rd. / White Rock Rd.
Realign and reconstruct Grantline Rd. from Douglas Blvd. through White Rock
Rd. west of Prairie City Rd. $2,600,000 2009
Watt/Folsom Interchange
SAC19350 Modification Modify the freeway interchange at U.S. 50 and Watt Ave/Folsom Blvd $26,800,000 2011
SAC19590 Various Locations Provide turning movements, improve intersections, and install traffic signals. $10,000,000 2010
SAC19610 Cypress Ave. Widen from Walnut Ave. to Mazanita from 2 to 4 lanes $1,600,000 2009
SAC19620 Elverta Road Widening
Widen Elverta Rd. from Dutch Haven Blvd. to Watt Ave. from 2 to 4 lanes
including Dry Creek Bridge to 6 lanes capacity (striped for 4). $10,100,000 2009
SAC19621 Elverta Road Widening
Widen Elverta Rd. from Rio Linda Blvd. to Dutch Haven Blvd. from 2 to 4
lanes including landscaped median, ADA improvements, transit access and
bike/pedestrian facilities. $7,356,000 2010
SAC19630 Fair Oaks Boulevard Widening
In Sacramento County, Fair Oaks Boulevard from Greenback Lane to Old
Auburn Road: widen from 2 to 4 lanes. $1,088,000 2020
SAC19640 Franklin Blvd. Widen from Martin Luther King, Jr Blvd. to Florin Rd. from 4 to 6 lanes $4,000,000 2010
SAC19650 Garfield Ave. Widen from Auburn Blvd. to Greenback Lane from 4 to 6 lanes $1,285,000 2009
SAC19660 Grantline Rd. Widen from Sloughouse Rd. to Sunrise Blvd. from 2 to 4 lanes $4,000,000 2011
SAC19670 Grantline Rd. Widen from Bond Rd. to Sloughouse Rd. from 2 to 4 lanes $11,000,000 2010
SAC19680 Roseville Rd. Widen from Watt Ave. to Antelope Road from 2 to 4 lanes. $3,000,000 2015
SAC19690 Gerber Road Widening
In Sacramento County, Gerber Road from Bradshaw Road to Vineyard Road:
widen from 2 to 4 lanes. $6,688,000 2015
SAC19700 Stockton Blvd. Widen from Elsie to Florin Rd. from 4 to 6 lanes $3,464,000 2010
SAC19710 Sunrise Blvd. Widen from SR 16 to Grantline Rd. from 2 to 4 lanes $7,000,000 2013
SAC19711 Sunrise Boulevard Widening
In Sacramento County, Sunrise Boulevard from SR 16 to north of Douglas
Road: widen from2 to 4 lanes. $15,000,000 2016
SAC19720 Sunrise Boulevard
In Sacramento County, Sunrise Boulevard at SR 16: add overcrossing and
ramps. $20,000,000 2014
SAC19790 Antelope Road Widening
In Sacramento County, Antelope Road from Don Julio Boulevard to Roseville
Road, widen from4 to 6 lanes. $735,000 2012
SAC20240 Zinfandel Road Extension
In Sacramento County, Zinfandel Road from Douglas Road to south terminus:
construct new road to 6 lanes. $4,790,000 2008
McClellan Commuter Rail In Sacramento County, former McClellan Air Force Base: construct a rail
SAC20360 Station
station. $5,000,000 2010
In Sacramento County, Grantline Road from Elk Grove Boulevard to
Sloughouse Road: add frontage roads to connect various local access roads
SAC20510 Grantline Road
intersecting Grantline. $25,000,000 2014
SAC20530 Grantline Road
In Sacramento County, Grantline Road from SR 99 to Bond Road: widen from
2 to 4 lanes. $12,000,000 2012
SAC20840 Various Locations Traffic Operations System Center - Stage II $16,000,000 2015
Page 15 of 23 4/4/2006

Appendix E
Project List
ID Project Title Project Description Total Cost
SAC21480
Franklin Boulevard
Streetscaping
SAC21500 Hazel Ave.
SAC22020 Antelope North Road Widening
SAC22070 Watt Ave. Phase 3 ITS Project
Watt Avenue Enhancements
SAC22200 Phase 2
I-80 Bicycle / Pedestrian
SAC22290 Crossing
SAC22300 Elverta Road Widening
SAC22320 Kiefer Boulevard
American River Access
SAC22330 Improvements
SAC22370
Bikeway Master Plan
Construction Phase 2
SAC22410 Douglas Road Widening
SAC22430 Eagles Nest Road Widening
SAC22690 Florin Road Enhancements
SAC22710
Fulton Ave. Enhancements
Phase 2
Completion
Year
Project development to provide landscaping and streetscaping on Franklin
Blvd. between Turnbridge Road and 38th Ave., and along 47th Ave., Franklin
Blvd to Light Rail Tracks. $3,475,000 2007
Widen American.River bridge and approaches from 4 to 6 lanes and widen
Hazel from A.R. bridge to Madison from 4 to 6 lanes with bike lanes and
signals and parkway features $85,190,000 2010
In Sacramento County, Antelope North Road from Poker Lane to Olive
Avenue, widen from 2 to 4 lanes. $3,020,000 2010
In Sacramento County, Watt Avenue Corridor, implement phase 3 priority and
mobility enhancement demonstration project. $2,725,000 2007
In Sacramento County, Watt Avenue from Capital City Freeway (SR51) to
Jackson Hwy. (SR16): construct curb, gutter, sidewalks, bikeways, lighting,
transit shelters and landscaped medians. $8,517,000 2007
In Sacramento County, conduct studies, and environmental work for a
bicycle/ped crossing of I-80 W of Madison Avenue. $550,000 2007
Widen from 2 to 4 lanes from Rio Linda Boulevard to connection to SR 99.
Includes biycle and pedestrian facilities. $26,000,000 2019
Construct a 4-lane roadway from Bradshaw Road to Sunrise Boulevard.
Includes bicycle and pedestrian facilities. $10,000,000 2025
Reserve funds for improved access across the American River between Howe
Avenue and Hazel Avenue. $80,000,000 2026
In Sacramento County, various locations throughout county construct onstreet
bikeways, including shoulder widenings to provide shoulders for the bike
lanes. $2,040,000 2007
In Sacramento County, Douglas Road from Excelsior Road to Sunrise
Boulevard, widen from 2 to 4 lanes. $11,067,000 2010
In Sacramento County, Eagles Nest Road from Kiefer Boulevard to Douglas
Road, widen from 2 to 4 lanes. $4,630,050 2015
In Sacramento County, Florin Road from Stockton Blvd. to Elk Grove-Florin
Road: construct sidewalks, bikeways, medians, lighting, landscaping and
streetscaping. $3,103,000 2006
In Sacramento County, Fulton Ave. from Arden Wy. to Auburn Blvd: construct
landscaped medians, streetscaping, sidewalks, bikeways, lighting, transit
shelters and landscaped medians. $6,139,920 2006
In Sacramento County, Watt Ave. from Antelope Rd. to Capital City Freeway
(SR51): install landscaping, streetscape, ADA frontage improvements,
sidewalks, lighting and bike facilities. $3,210,000 2008
SAC22720 Watt Avenue Enhancements
ITS on Greenback/ Sunrise
SAC22770 Blvd. Smart Corridor on Greenback/Sunrise Blvd. $7,600,000 2012
Construct 5-mile Class I multi-use trail on Dry Creek Pkwy, Cherry Island
SAC22780 Dry Creek Parkway Trail Soccer Complex to Dry Creek Rd. $1,701,825 2007
Construct a 4 lane roadway from Grantline/ Route 99 interchange to I-5 at
Hood Franklin Blvd. Can be changed to widening of existing streets. (part of
SAC22900 Kammerer Road
the parkway package) $18,443,980 2016
SAC22905 Kammerer Road
In Elk Grove and Sacramento County: Kammerer Road from I-5 to SR 99:
enhance as a 4 lane parkway. $31,556,020 2021
SAC22940 Elkhorn Boulevard Widening
Construct a two lane roadway with the following alignment: Power Line Road,
along the north side of I-5 and loop into the airport, merging with Airport
Blvd/Crossfield Dr. with landscaped medians. $15,000,000 2019
In Sacramento County, Power Line Road to Lone Tree Road, realign and
NEW Elkhorn Boulevard Widening construct new road to 2 lanes and median with landscaping. $5,000,000 2008
Construct a 6-lane roadway from Route 50 to International Drive extension.
This includes a south only interchange with Route 50 and pedestrian and
SAC22980 Alta Sunrise Boulevard bicycle facilities. $45,000,000 2015
SAC22990 International Drive
Construct a 6 lane roadway from current terminus to Alta Sunrise Boulevard.
Includes bicycle and pedestrian faciliites. $6,000,000 2010
SAC23080 Hazel Avenue Widen from 4 to 6 lanes from Madison to Sacramento/Placer County line. $77,500,000 2017
SAC23160 New Road
Construct a new 4 lane limited access road from Grant Line Road/ White Rock
Road through Aerojet's property to U. S. 50 near Hazel Ave. $9,335,000 2015
SAC23220 White Rock Road
In Sacramento County, White Rock Road from Sunrise Park Drive to El
Dorado County line: realign and widen with shoulders. $20,000,000 2017
South County Transit
South Sacramento County to north San Joaquin County: provide hourly jobs
access transit service between Lodi, Galt, Elk Grove and south Sacramento
SAC23270 Operations
County $2,103,690 2007
SAC23980
Pedestrian Master Plan
Implementation Project
Construct pedestrian facilities and improvements in various locations
throughout Sacramento County in accordance with the adopted Sacramento
County Pedestrian Master Plan. The project includes improvements to
existing corridors to enhance pedestrian safety and mobility, including
sidewalk and walkway construction, pedestrian signal installation,
improvements to existing signalized and non-signalized intersections and
pedestrian crossings, and other improvements to benefit pedestrian access
and safety. All improvements will be constructed in compliance with
pedestrian facility improvement standards set forth in the adopted Master
Plan. $1,447,000 2007
Page 16 of 23 4/4/2006

Appendix E
Project List
ID Project Title Project Description Total Cost
SAC24035 Gerber Road Widening Project
SAC24036
Vineyard Road Improvement,
Calvine Road to Gerber Road
Completion
Year
The project proposes to widen Gerber Road between Elk Grove-Florin Road
and Bradshaw Road 2 to 4 lanes. $3,854,000 2008
In Sacramento County, widen from 2 to 4 lanes, replace two existing bridges
on Vineyard Road, install two new traffic signals, widen pavement to an
arterial roadway width, and construct landscaped median. The bridges are
located at Laguna Creek and a tributary of Elder Creek. $4,207,000 2008
This project provides for the development and implementation of audible
signals and other ADA compliant upgrades at various locations throughout the
County of Sacramento. The audible signals will be installed in accordance
with the latest County Standards and current ADA requirements. The
locations are based on citizen's requests and recommended by the County's
Physical Access Subcommittee (PASC) of the Disability Advisory Committee.
The locations are: 1)Alta Arden Expressway @ Morse Ave; 2)Arden Way @
Watt Ave.; 3) Auburn Blvd. @ Hemlock St.; 4)Arden Way @ Professional Dr.;
5)El Camino Ave. @ Yorktown Ave.; 6)Auburn Blvd. @ Palm Ave.; 7)Auburn
Blvd. @ Garfield Ave.; 8)Fair Oaks Blvd. @ Sunrise Blvd.; 9)San Juan Ave. @
Sunset Ave.; 10) Cottage Way @ Bell St.; 11)Howe Ave. @ Hurley Way;
12)Fulton Ave @ Hurley Way; 13)Watt Ave. @ Kings Way/Chenu Ave.;
SAC24037
Intersection Improvements,
Disabled Access 04/05
14)Mather Field Rd. @ Mills Station Rd. Locations may be added or deleted
based on the PASC's subsequent recommendations. $948,000 2007
SAC24062
Galt / South Sacramento
County Transit Preventive
Maintenance
In Galt and south Sacramento County, perform preventive maintenance for
South County Transit. $1,539,875 2007
In Sacramento County, Freedom Park Drive: construct pedestrian and
streetscape improvements to serve as a gateway into adjacent McClellan
SAC24066 Freedom Park Drive
Park. $1,500,000 2008
Sacramento Regional Transit District
Amtrak / Folsom Corridor Light Folsom Corridor - Downtown Sacramento Folsom - light rail extension
REG15040
Rail Project
(including vehicle purchase) $256,000,000 2006
South Sacramento Light Rail Construct a light rail extension from Meadowview Road to Cosumnes River
REG15053
Project-Phase 2 Extension College $202,529,000 2010
REG15304 CNG Bus Fleet Expansion Purchase 60 CNG buses for fleet expansion from 2005 through 2025 $33,750,000 2025
Light Rail Vehicle Rehabilitation
REG15880 Complete a mid-life rehabilitation of the light rail vehicle fleet
Program
$118,482,400 2025
Double track all existing single track sections of Northeast Corridor LRT and
Northeast Corridor
REG16470 make various improvements to implement exprress service from Watt/I-80 to
Enhancements Project
Downtown Sacramento $25,000,000 2009
REG16670 SRTD Operating Assistance Sacramento Regional Transit District: operation of transit service. $3,775,579,514 2025
REG16680 RT Preventive Maintenance
Sacramento Regional Transit District: provide for scheduled and unscheduled
maintenance for bus and light rail revenue vehicles and facilities.
$1,085,552,212 2025
South Sacramento Light Rail
REG17190 Construct a light rail extension from Cosumnes River College to Elk Grove
Project-Phase 3 Extension
$182,000,000 2019
REG17221 Antelope Light Rail Extension
Construct an extension of light rail line from I-80/Watt Avenue to Antelope
Road $290,000,000 2025
Laguna West Light Rail Construct a light rail extension from Meadowview to the Laguna West area of
REG17230
Extension
Elk Grove $91,740,000 2019
Satellite Bus Maintenance
REG17300 In Sacramento, site and build satellite bus maintenance facility.
Facility
$23,000,000 2009
REG17320 Downtown-Natomas-Airport Light rail extension from Downtown Sacramento to Sacramento International
Light Rail Extension
Airport $623,500,000 2015
REG17330 Watt Avenue Bus Rapid Transit
Develop a bus rapid transit corridor on Watt Avenue between Folsom Blvd
and McClellan Business Park $30,000,000 2010
Sunrise Boulevard Bus Rapid Develop a bus rapid transit corridor on Sunrise Blvd between Douglas Blvd
REG17430
Transit
and the Placer County line $30,000,000 2013
Paratransit Vehicle Fleet
REG17781 Purchase 314 paratransit vehicles for fleet replacement
Replacement
$26,690,000 2021
REG17782 CNG Bus Fleet Replacement Purchase 135 CNG buses for fleet replacement from 2005 through 2009 $50,625,000 2009
Sutter County Caltrans District 3
In Sutter County, SR 20 from Sacramento River Bridge to Hagerman Road,
CAL10690 SR 20 Road Rehabilitation rehabilitate roadway. $4,893,000 2008
CAL10700 SR 99 Planting & Irrigation
In Yuba City, SR 99 from SR 20 to north of Queens Avenue - replace planting
and upgrade irrigation. $2,616,000 2009
CAL15722
Sutter/Yuba Route 70 Corridor
Project
Near East Nicolaus - Route 99 to Cornelius Road - construct 4-lane
expressway $58,900,000 2012
CAL15770 Route 20 Widen from 4 to 6 lanes from Walton Rd to Rocca Way $2,000,000 2010
CAL15780 Route 20 Construct urban interchange at Route 99 and Route 20 $16,322,000 2025
CAL17270 SR 99 Garden Hwy - SR 70
Near Yuba City, SR 99, Route 70 junction to Garden Highway - widen to 4
lanes with a continuous left-trun lane. $16,076,000 2009
CAL17350
Route 70 Expressway
Construction
Near Rio Oso - Cornelius Avenue to Bear River Bridge (Yuba County) -
construct 4-lane expressway $75,900,000 2012
CAL17660
SR 99 Garden Hwy -
Sacramento Ave
Near Yuba City, from Garden Hwy. to Sacramento Ave, widen from 2 to 4
lanes, with a median left-turn lane, new bridge and an undercrossing. $47,170,000 2020
Page 17 of 23 4/4/2006

Appendix E
Project List
ID Project Title Project Description Total Cost
Completion
Year
CAL18160 Route 99
Widen Route 99 from 2 to 4 lanes from five miles south of Live Oak to the
northern-most city limits. $37,500,000 2015
CAL18350 SR 99 Central - O'Banion
Near Yuba City, SR 99, Central Ave. to O'Banion Rd.; widen to 4 lanes with a
median. $59,103,000 2011
CAL18590 Route 99, New interchange
Sutter County, north of Sacramento: along Route 99 between Riego Road and
Sankey Road, construct new interchange $22,000,000 2016
CAL18742
SR-99, Yuba City - Rehabilitate
Roadway In Yuba City - Lincoln Road to Butte House Road - rehabilitate roadway $16,132,000 2008
CAL18746
SR-20 Feather River Bridge -
upgrade bridge rail In Yuba City - Feather River Bridge #18-9 - upgrade bridge rail $8,279,000 2007
City of Live Oak
SUT10781 SR 99 In Live Oak, SR 99 at Elm Street, install signal $250,000 2006
SUT10795 Pennington Road Phase 1
In Live Oak, Pennington Road from SR99 to 50' w of Connecticut Ave.:
reconstruct and widen from 2 to 4 lanes; reconstruct RR crossing. $1,287,000 2010
Sutter County Dept of Public Works
CAL16950 SR 99 Riego Rd. Interchange In Sutter County, SR 99 at Riego Road, construct new five-lane interchange. $28,510,000 2009
SUT10270 Pleasant Grove Road Realign South - Howsley Road / Widen to 4 lanes Howsley Rd to Riego Rd. $984,000 2010
SUT10310 Pleasant Grove Rd. Widen to 4 lanes, Bear River Dr. to Yuba County $1,070,000 2010
SUT10330 Riego Road
In Sutter County, Riego Road from SR 99 to Power Line Road: widen from 2
to 4 lanes. $9,356,000 2010
SUT10340 Riego Rd Widen to 4 or 6 lanes, Route 99 to Placer Co. $3,142,000 2009
SUT10350 Riego Road
In Sutter County, Riego Road from SR 99 to Pacific Avenue: widen from 2 to 6
lanes. $5,825,000 2010
SUT10360 Riego Road
In Sutter County, Riego Road from Pacific Avenue to Road F: widen from 2 to
6 lanes. $7,698,000 2010
SUT10370 Lincoln Rd. Widen to 2 lanes with a center lane from Jones Rd. to Walton Rd. $688,000 2010
SUT10390 Butte House Rd. Upgrade to 2 lane urban standard, Acacia Ave. to Humphrey Rd. $445,000 2010
SUT10400 Riego Road
In Sutter County, Riego Road from Road F to Pleasant Grove Road: widen
from 2 to 6 lanes including grade separation at RR xing. $13,927,000 2010
SUT10480 Route 99/70 Construct a 4 lane interchange on Route 99/70 at Sankey Road $20,000,000 2015
SUT10490 Riego Road Widen from 2 to 4 lanes from Route 99/70 to 2 miles westward. $2,000,000 2010
SUT10500 Sankey Road Widen from 2 to 4 lanes from Pleasant Grove Blvd. to Route 99/70. $2,500,000 2015
SUT10510 Pacific Avenue Widen from 2 to 4 lanes from Sankey Road to Riego Road. $1,500,000 2012
SUT10710 Road A
In Sutter County, Road A 1 mile west of SR 99 from Riego Road to one half
mile south: construct new 4 lane road. $2,578,000 2010
SUT10720 Road B
In Sutter County, one half mile west of SR 99, from Riego Road to one half
mile south: construct new 4 lane road. $2,693,000 2010
SUT10730 Road C
In Sutter County, one half mile south of Riego Road, from Road A to Road B:
construct new 4 lane road. $3,624,000 2010
SUT10740 Road D
In Sutter County, one half mile east of SR 99, from Riego Road to one half
mile south: construct new 4 lane road. $2,693,000 2010
SUT10750 Road E
In Sutter County, one half mile south of Riego Road between Road D and
Road F: construct new 4 lane road. $7,421,000 2010
SUT10760 Road F
In Sutter County, one mile east of Pacific Avenue from Riego Road to Road E:
construct new 4 lane road. $3,515,000 2010
SUT10788 Township Road conform grind,level course,fabric,overlay,shoulders $500,000 2006
SUT10789 George Washington Road conform grind,level course,fabric,overlay,shoulders $150,000 2006
SUT10790 George Washington Road conform grind,levelcourse,fabric,overlay,shoulders $150,000 2007
SUT10792 Pleasant Grove Road
In Sutter County, Pleasant Grove Road from Betz Road to Kempton Road and
from Marcum Road to Auburn Ravine: conform grind,level
course,fabric,overlay,shoulders $450,000 2007
SUT10826 5th Street Bridge Replace 2 lane Seismic Deficient bridge with 4 lane structure $36,250,000 2012
SUT10827 RR Bridge Conversion Convert Railroad Bridge to 2 lane vehicular crossing $14,000,000 2012
Yuba City Dept of Public Works
SUT10241 Walton Avenue Widening
Widen Walton Ave from Franklin to Lincoln from 2-3 lanes to 5 lanes including
upgrades to bike lanes, sidewalks, curbs, gutters, and drainage $909,000 2008
SUT10250 Bridge Street Widening
In Yuba City, Bridge Street from Cooper Street to Gray Avenue: widen to 4
lanes. $1,150,000 2006
SUT10260 Harter Road
In Yuba City, construct 4 lane Harter Road between SR 20 and Bridge Street,
construct streetscaping improvements on Harter from Butte House Rd to SR
20, install signal at Harter and Butte House and modify signal at Harter and
SR 20. $7,500,000 2006
SUT10280
Bridge Street at 2nd St.
Realignment
In Yuba City, Bridge Street at Second Street: realign Second Street north of
the 5th Street Bridge and install traffic signal. $672,000 2007
SUT10430 Plumas Street
Extension of Plumas Street from Franklin Avenue to a connection with Percy
Avenue, including lighting and landscaping. $848,000 2008
SUT10460 Plumas Street
In Yuba City, Plumas Street from B Street to bridge: relocate curbs and
sidewalks, modify signals, and remove RR track. $1,315,100 2006
SUT10530 Franklin Avenue Widen 2 to 4 lanes from Route 99 to Clark Avenue $950,000 2015
SUT10540 Garden Highway
Widen from Franklin Avenue to Second St. to provide bicycle facilities and onstreet
improvements. $500,000 2015
SUT10550 Garden Highway Widen from 2 to 4 lanes from Epley Drive to Winship Road. $500,000 2015
Page 18 of 23 4/4/2006

Appendix E
Project List
ID Project Title Project Description Total Cost
Completion
Year
SUT10620 SR 99 In Yuba City, SR 99: add signalized intersection north of Bridge Street. $1,500,000 2010
SUT10794
Cinema 14 and Mixed-Use
Retail Complex Transportation
Improvements
In Yuba City, construct signal-phasing modifications, pedestrian-scale street
lighting, sidewalks and new pedestrian crossings as part of the city's
downtown revitalization strategy. $700,000 2006
Various Counties Caltrans District 3
CAL16800 Various Locations
Caltrans District 3 TOS projects. Includes ramp meters, HOV on-ramp lanes,
traffic monitoring stations, closed circuit television cameras, changeable
message signs, highway advisory radio, weather monitoring systems, loop
detectors, etc. $70,000,000 2025
CAL17250
Feather River Bridge on Route
65
Construct 2-lane Third Feather River Bridge, with right-of-way for ultimate 4
lanes, from Route 70 in Yuba County to Route 99 in Sutter County. $232,500,000 2025
CAL17260 Marysville Bypass
In Yuba and Butte Counties, SR 70 from SR 65 to Ophir Road in Butte
County, construct four-lane freeway on new alignment. Butte County is
contributing an additional $3 million in RIP funds. $3,000,000 2011
CAL17380
SACOG Region Emergency
Repair Program
Lump Sum - Emergency Repair with non-ER funds (non-capacity increasing
projects only) $300,000 2007
CAL17900 U.S. 50
Construct Traffic Operations System (TOS) on U.S. 50 from Scott Rd. to
Cameron Park $5,000,000 2006
CAL18280 Wheatland Bypass
Construct a new 4 lane expressway from the future north end of Route 65
Lincoln Bypass to the existing Route 65, near South Beale Road, with access
control. $184,000,000 2025
CAL18330 Roseville Third Track
Construct third track on the UP mainline between Elvas Tower in Sac County
and Roseville Station in Placer County. $19,000,000 2008
CAL18736 Metal Beam Guard Rail
In Sacramento, Placer, Yuba, and Yolo Counties - on various routes - upgrade
metal beam guard rail end treatments $2,966,000 2008
CAL18750 State Minor Funded Program
Lump Sum - State Minor Funded Program (Non-Capacity Increasing Projects
Only).Previously programmed as CAL17370 in 2002 MTIP. $1,500,000 2006
Lump Sum - Local Hazard Elimination and Safety projects, non-capacity
VAR10060 SACOG Area HES Program increasing only $528,000 2007
Capital Corridor Joint Powers Board
CAL18320 Sacramento/Placer Counties Sacramento to Roseville track and signal improvements $7,280,000 2007
CAL18290 Intercity Rail
Add three modern trainsets with a locomotive to the Capitol Corridor
passenger rail service with the proposed increased service frequencies $48,000,000 2010
Sac. Metro Air Quality Management District
Conduct the Spare the Air Education Program jointly funded by the
Sacramento Metro AQMD, Yolo-Solano AQMD and the Placer County Air
SAC21080 Spare the Air Program Quality Control District $3,089,801 2007
SACOG
Sacramento Metropolitan Area Provide ride-matching services for the Sacramento metropolitan area;
SAC20400 Rideshare Program
cooperate with local agencies in Highway 50 outreach effort. (TDM) $1,589,992 2007
In SACOG Region, perform administrative work to implement regional funding
programs (community design, air quality, transportation demand management
SAC20410 SACOG Regional Programs and bicycle/pedestrian). $192,025 2007
SAC22090 SECAT Program
Heavy-Duty NOx control strategies; SECAT program; GIS Transit program
(includes bus stop and centralized regional transit information system, and trip
planning) $69,402,521 2007
Rancho Cordova-Placer In Sacramento and Placer Counties: study a multi-modal connector between
VAR10350 Connector
Rancho Cordova and Placer County. $1,250,000 2009
VAR10460
Transportation Demand
Management
SACOG region: implement transportation demand management. Annual
program includes SACOG rideshare program, marketing and other strategies
to reduce travel demand. $9,754,337 2025
VAR11000
Regionwide STARNET
Integration
In SACOG region, implement regionwide STARNET integration and related
ITS projects. $2,000,000 2006
VAR22100
Clean Air Investments and
Improvements Lump Sum of clean air investments and improvements $201,914,819 2025
VAR22200 Other Road Improvements Lump Sum of other road improvements $2,176,193,053 2025
Transportation Demand
VAR23500 Management Lump Sum of transportation demand management $49,630,526 2025
VAR24000 Soundwalls Lump Sum of soundwalls $16,826,235 2025
VAR24200
Road and Bridge Maintenenace
and Rehabilitation Lump Sum of road and bridge maintenance and rehabilitation $7,662,491,708 2025
VAR24300
Landscaping and Street
Enhancements Lump Sum of landscaping and street enhancements $26,921,976 2025
VAR24900
Other Transit Capital
Improvements Lump Sum of other transit capital improvements $291,654,739 2025
VAR27000 Community Design Lump Sum of community design $560,874,498 2025
Bicycle and Pedestrian
VAR30000 Improvements Lump Sum of bicycle and pedestrian improvements $392,612,149 2025
VAR56001
State Implementation Plan for
Air Quality - SACOG Region
In SACOG region, perform modeling, control measure evaluations, public
outreach and environmental documents for new SIP based on 8-hour ozone
requirements. $1,000,000 2007
Page 19 of 23 4/4/2006

Appendix E
Project List
ID Project Title Project Description Total Cost
Completion
Year
VAR56002 SACOG Blueprint Project
In the SACOG Region, develop a comprehensive regional process that
integrates land use and transportation, air quality and other regional concerns.
The Blueprint project utilizes extensive public outreach and modeling tools to
estimate the transportation, air quality, economic and other effects of current
land use patterns and develop alternatives to those patterns. $265,564 2007
Sacramento Regional Transit District
REG17200 West Sacramento Rail Transit Extend rail transit from Downtown Sacramento to West Sacramento. $90,250,000 2025
Various Agencies
REG17710 Regional Commuter Rail
Auburn to Dixon on UPRR ROW: operate start-up commuter rail during peak
periods with leased rolling stock for three years. Minimum of six round trips
daily. $22,700,000 2008
REG17720
Regional Commuter Rail
Operations
Sacramento Metropolitan Area: operating and maintenance costs for
commuter rail between Davis and Auburn. $170,800,000 2006
Yuba Sutter Transit
YST10170 Fixed Route Fleet Replacement Purchase ten fixed route buses for fleet replacement & minor expansion $2,750,000 2008
Demand Response Vehicle
YST10190 Replacement Purchase ten demand response/rural route vehicles for fleet replacement $600,000 2008
YST10200 Fixed Route Vehicle Acquisition Purchase eight fixed route buses for fleet replacement & minor expansion $2,200,000 2012
Demand Response Vehicle
YST10210 Acquisition Purchase ten demand response/rural route vehicles for fleet replacement $600,000 2017
YST10220 Commuter Bus Acquisition Purchase six commuter buses for fleet replacement & minor expansion $1,650,000 2018
YST10230 Fixed Route Vehicle Acquisition Purchase twelve fixed route buses for fleet replacement & minor expansion $3,300,000 2020
Purchase four commuter buses for fleet replacement and minor fleet
YST10240 Commuter Bus Acquisition expansion $1,100,000 2021
YST10260 Commuter Bus Purchase Purchase six commuter buses for fleet replacement and minor fleet expansion $1,692,000 2006
YST10340 Commuter Bus Acquisition Purchase five commuter buses for fleet replacement & minor expansion $1,375,000 2014
YST10350
Demand Response Vehicle
Acquisition Purchase ten demand response/rural route vehicles for fleet replacement $600,000 2025
YST10360 Commuter Bus Acquisition Ppurchase five commuter buses for fleet replacement $1,375,000 2025
YST10370 Fixed Route Vehicle Acquisition Purchase ten fixed route buses for fleet replacement & minor expansion $2,750,000 2023
YST10390
Demand Response Vehicle
Acquisition
Purchase seven demand response/rural route vehicles for fleet replacement &
minor expansion $420,000 2012
YST10400
Demand Response Vehicle
Acquisition
Purchase nine demand response/rural route vehicles for fleet replacement &
minor expansion $540,000 2021
YST10410 Facility Expansion
Expand the capacity of the existing maintenance, operations and
administration facility $750,000 2010
YST10412 Operating Assistance FY 2006 Operating Assistance for FY 2006 $3,640,705 2006
YST10416
Operating Assistance for FY
2007 Operating Assistance for FY 2007 $3,835,705 2007
YST10417 Commuter Bus Purchase Purchase three commuter buses for fleet expansion & minor expansion $825,000 2009
Yolo County Caltrans District 3
CAL10530 U.S. 50
From I-80 to Sacramento County line--install traffic operations system
(message signs, ramp metering, cctv) $600,000 2015
CAL10730
SR 275 Tower Bridge
Rehabilitation In West Sacramento, SR 275 Tower Bridge: rehabilitate deck. $2,647,000 2006
CAL15882 I-5/SR113 Interchange (Ph.3)
Phase 3 Construct northbound SR113 to southbound I-5 freeway to freeway
connection. $30,200,000 2015
CAL16330 I-80 / U.S. 50
Carpool lane from Richards Blvd. in Davis to Sacramento County line on I-80 /
U.S. 50. $110,000,000 2022
CAL16370
SR 84 (Jefferson Blvd.)
Relinquishment
In West Sacramento, from south West Sacramento urban limits to I-80:
relinquishment from Caltrans to the City of West Sacramento. $6,199,000 2006
CAL16880 Route 50, various locations
Yolo County portion of U.S. 50 traffic operations system and ramp metering at
various locations. $4,800,000 2006
CAL18743
SR-16 Widen Shoulder and
Other Improvements
Near Brooks - east of Mossy Creek Bridge to west of Route 505 - widen
shoulder and construct left turn lane and right turn pockets $54,487,000 2011
CAL18747
U.S. 50 in West Sacramento -
Rehabilitate Pavement
In West Sacramento - Route 80 to Sacramento County Line; also in
Sacramento County from Yolo County Line to 65th Street - rehabilitate
pavement $10,684,000 2007
YOL15880 US 50 Harbor Blvd Interchange
In West Sacramento, US 50, Harbor Blvd Interchange: widen to 6 lanes,revise
ramps and add auxiliary lanes. $36,700,000 2013
CAL15881 I-5/SR113 Interchange
Phase 2 - Construct northbound I-5 to southbound SR113 freeway to freeway
connection- I-5 NB to 113 SB $52,450,000 2017
City of Davis Dept of Public Works
YOL16400
Hutchison Drive Bike Lanes &
Old Davis Road Landscaping
UC Davis Campus, Hutchison Drive, CR 98 - SR 113: widen to accommodate
bike lanes; Old Davis Road, from I-80 to California Avenue: add sustainable
landscaping and water-conserving irrigation. $1,424,000 2006
Page 20 of 23 4/4/2006

Appendix E
Project List
ID Project Title Project Description Total Cost
Completion
Year
YOL17130 Route 113/Covell Blvd. Construct additional width on Covell Blvd. including the overcrossing structure
Interchange
to install adequate turn lanes for accesss-egress to Route 113. $15,000,000 2020
YOL17140 I-80
Reconstruct the north side of Richards Blvd. interchange to remove the loop
on and off ramps and replace with new ramp in diamond configuration.
Includes traffic signal installation. $10,000,000 2015
YOL17150 Chiles Road
Widen Chiles Road from 2 to 4 lanes from the I-80 eastbound ramp and
Ensenada Dr. Includes bike lanes. $1,600,000 2015
YOL17160 Lake Blvd. / Covell Blvd. Install a traffic signal at Lake Blvd. and Covell Blvd. $160,000 2015
YOL17170 Mace curve
Widen Mace from Alhambra Dr. to Alhambra Dr. (Mace curve) from 2 to 4
lanes, provide bike lanes, a landscaped median, and turn lanes. $2,200,000 2015
YOL17180 Covell Blvd.
Widen Covell Blvd. from 2 to 4 lanes from Shasta Dr. and Denali Dr. and
provide bike lanes and a center median. $1,600,000 2015
YOL19210 Downtown Multimodal Parking
Structure
In Davis, construct multistory parking structure to serve multimodal
transportation center (Amtrak, Unitrans, Davis Community Transit, commercial
shuttles and bike/ped) and the downtown Davis business district.
$17,100,000 2009
City of West Sacramento Dept of Public Works
YOL15130 Harbor Blvd. West Capitol Ave. to Industrial, 4 to 6 lanes $6,000,000 2013
YOL15160 Industrial Boulevard Widening
In West Sacramento, Industrial Boulevard from the Palamidessi Bridge at the
Barge Canal to Harbor Boulevard: widen from 4 to 6 lanes. $4,000,000 2015
YOL15180 South River Rd.
Reconstruct and widen South River Road to 4 lanes including new 4-lane
bridge over barge canal $16,300,000 2010
YOL15670 I-80/Reed Ave. Interchange
Windening of ramps at the intersection with Reed Ave., widening of Reed
Ave., and some limitation of local street access. Ramp metering would be
added to the on-ramps. $11,250,000 2015
YOL15680
U.S. 50/South River Road
Interchange Install ramp meters and modify ramp design at South River Rd interchange. $10,660,000 2015
YOL15891 I-80 Enterprise Boulevard
In West Sacramento, I-80 at Enterprise Boulevard: construct eastbound onramp.
$3,000,000 2010
YOL15900
U.S. 50/Jefferson Blvd.
Interchange
Modify and expand the ramps and signals at the Jefferson Blvd. interchange,
add ramp metering and turn lanes, and modification and/or access control of
streets adjacent to the interchange. $26,450,000 2015
Widen from 2 to 6 lanes from Jefferson Blvd. to the new Palamidessi Bridge at
the barge canal. $4,000,000 2013
YOL15940 Lake Washington Blvd.
YOL15950 Lake Washington Blvd. Widen the Palamidessi Bridge over the barge canal from 4 to 6 lanes. $4,000,000 2015
In West Sacramento, Tower Bridge Gateway from UPRR underpass, east to
Tower Bridge Gateway the Tower Bridge: reconfigure from a controlled access expressway to an
Modification/3rd & 5th Streets arterial roadway with signalized at-grade intersection at 3rd Street and 5th
YOL16492 Intersections (Phase 2) Street. $7,000,000 2013
YOL19211
YOL16550
Tower Bridge Gateway/Garden
Street Intersection
Grant Ave. - Winters
In West Sacramento, Tower Bridge (former Highway 275) at Garden Street:
lower existing roadway to become an at-grade boulevard at the Tower Bridge
Gateway. $5,000,000 2007
City of Winters Dept of Public Works
In Winters, intersection of Grant Ave. (SR 128) and Railroad Ave, install traffic
signal. $1,082,000 2007
In Winters, Railroad Avenue from Grant Avenue to north city limits: install
class 2 bike lanes. $1,500,000 2011
YOL16620 Railroad Avenue Bike Lanes
YOL16670 Grant Ave./I-505 Overcrossing In Winters, Grant Avenue at I-505: widen Grant Avenue overcrossing. $3,750,000 2013
Putah Creek Bridge
YOL19213 Replacement
City of Winters; Railroad Avenue over Putah Creek, from Wolfskill Street and
Putah Creek Road: replace historic Putah Creek Bridge. $2,000,000 2010
City of Woodland Dept of Public Works
YOL17270 Pioneer Avenue Widen from 2 to 4 lanes between Gibson Road and Parkway Drive. $3,338,450 2025
YOL17280 Matmor Road Extend from Tyler Drive to County Road 24C as a 2 lane road. $1,933,150 2018
YOL17290 Kentucky Avenue Widen from 2 to 4 lanes from College St. to West St. $3,537,189 2008
YOL17300 I-5 / CR 102
Reconstruct interchange on I-5 at County Road 102 including overcrossing of I-
5. $19,984,000 2018
YOL17310 County Road 102 Widen from 2 to 4 lanes from Beamer Street to East Main Street. $2,896,850 2020
YOL17330 County Road 102 Widen from 2 to 4 lanes between Kentucky Avenue to Beamer Street. $2,896,850 2015
YOL17340 County Road 25A Construct a 2 lane minor arterial from Route 113 interchange to CR 102. $3,893,760 2015
YOL17350 Parkway Drive Construct a 2 lane arterial from East Street to College Street. $3,359,150 2020
YOL17360 Parkway Drive Construct a 4 lane arterial from Pioneer Ave. to East Street. $9,044,750 2025
YOL17370 Parkway Drive Construct a 2-lane arterial from County Road 102 to Pioneer Avenue. $5,087,520 2008
YOL17380 Coloma Way Construct a 2 lane collector from County Road 24A to County Road 24C. $619,850 2025
YOL17390 College Street Construct a 2 lane collector frokm County Road 24 A to County Road 24C $619,850 2025
YOL17400 Kentucky Avenue Widen from 2 to 4 lanes from East Street to College Street $6,524,510 2008
YOL17420 Main Street Construct South side from Ashley Avenue to Cottonwood Street. $360,000 2015
YOL17450 Thomas Street Extend from Main Street to Armfield Avenue. $655,500 2010
YOL17540 Pioneer Avenue
In Woodland: construct new 2-lane major arterial between County Road 24C
and County Road 25A. $8,188,100 2020
YOL17550 County Road 102
In Woodland, County Road 102 from Gibson Road to County Road 25A: widen
from 2 to 4 lanes. $11,227,300 2023
YOL17560 East Street Widening
In Woodland, East Street from County Road 24A to south city limits: widen
from 2 to 4 lanes. $5,750,000 2025
Page 21 of 23 4/4/2006

Appendix E
Project List
ID Project Title Project Description Total Cost
Completion
Year
YOL17575 Lemen Realignment Phase 2 In Woodland, Lemen Avenue realignment at Cannery Road (Phase 2). $1,376,000 2007
University Transport System
UNI10210 Unitrans Capital Assistance purchase 25 new buses for expansion $10,000,000 2027
UNI10320 Unitrans Operating Assistance In Davis, operating Assistance for Unitrans. $11,407,000 2007
UNI10330 Unitrans Capital Assistance
Capital Assistance - vehicle replacement/minor fleet expansion/bus
rehabilitation $30,015,000 2027
UNI10331 UCD Hydrogen Bus Project
In Davis, Unitrans: implement UC Davis Hydrogen Bus Technology Validation
Project Phases 3 and 4 (Phases 1 & 2 included in UNI10330); later phases
include enhancements and support for two HCNG converted buses and
additional HCNG conversions. $1,987,759 2012
UNI10340 Unitrans Capital Assistance Capital Assistance - Unitrans Maintenance Facility Expansion $4,000,000 2023
UNI10360 Unitrans Capital Assistance Capital Assistance - Transit Corridor Terminal Improvements $1,575,000 2007
UNI10380 Unitrans Capital Assistance
Capital Assistance - Office, shop, operating equipment, and non-revenue
vehicles for existing facilities $2,569,800 2027
UNI10440 Unitrans Capital Assistance Unitrans bus stop improvements, accessibility, and passenger amenities $3,190,000 2027
Yolo County Dept of Public Works
YOL15440
CR 99, CR 29 & CR 99D
Bikeways
In Yolo County, CR 99 from CR 27 to CR 29 and CR 29 from CR 99 to SR 113
and CR 99D from CR 29 to Davis City limits: construct class II bikeways by
adding four foot shoulders and rehabilitating existing roadway. $1,625,912 2007
In Yolo County on CR 32A, from CR 105 to Mace Blvd.: rehabilitate roadway
and add four foot bike lanes. $1,157,604 2008
In Yolo County, CR 98 from CR 29 (Davis) to Woodland, add shoulders and
bike lanes to roadway and two existing bridges and rehab roadway. $272,245 2009
SR 16, Brooks to Rumsey: construct roadside rests with scenic and/or historic
interpretive signs. $33,888 2006
YOL15520 County Road 32A Bike Lane
County Road Bike
YOL16280 Improvements
SR 16 Capay Valley Roadside
YOL17520 Rests
YOL17610 CR 102 from 17 to 18C Pavement Rehabilitation $530,568 2006
In Yolo County, perform circulation planning activities to integrate smart
growth principles into the Yolo County General Plan, and foster higher density
Growing Space: Updating the mixed-use development with pedestrian and bicycle-oriented neighborhoods
General Plan to Support Smart in rural small towns, to reduce future vehicle demand and protect valuable
YOL19212 Growth in Rural Communities agricultural and habitat resources. $772,086 2007
Yolo County Transportation District
YCT10250 YCTD Purchase 27 new buses for replacement and expanded service countywide. $10,260,000 2010
YCT10980 West Sacramento Rail Station In West Sacramento, construct station for regional rail service. $1,129,560 2007
YCT18062
Rural formula operating
assistance Rural formula FTA Section 5311 opearting assistance $695,041 2006
YCT18063
YCTD Rural formula operating
assistance Rural formula FTA Section 5311 operating assistance $709,160 2007
YCT18065 YCTD Spare the Air Project
Spare the Air project, free fares on Yolobus on spare the air event days;
Project YCT 11020, MTIP amendment 03-14 $70,360 2006
YCT18066 Preventive Maintenance Yolobus fleet preventive maintenance $1,281,250 2006
YCT18067 Road supervisors' vehicles Purchase non-revenue vehicles for road supervisors $75,000 2006
YCT18068
ADA paratransit operating
assistance Operating assistance for ADA paratransit service $162,500 2006
YCT18069 Transit planning Transit service and operations planning and development review $81,250 2006
YCT18070 ADA vehicles Purchase revenue vehicles for ADA service $160,000 2006
YCT18071 Office equipment Purchase office equipment including computers, printers, copier $115,000 2006
YCT18072 Bus stop improvements Improvements to various bus stops in Yolobus system $81,250 2006
YCT18073 Safety and Security Safety and security improvements to bus stops and facilities $75,000 2006
YCT18074
Yolobus Administration and
Maintenance Facility
Improvements
Improvements to the administration and maintenance facility for Yolobus
located in Woodland, including the CNG fueling station $3,125,000 2007
YCT18075 Preventive Maintenance Yolobus fleet preventive maintenance $1,141,250 2007
YCT18076 ADA paratransit operations Operating assistance for ADA paratransit service $187,500 2007
YCT18077 transit planning Transit service and operations planning and development review $85,000 2007
YCT18078 ADAvehicles Purchase revenue vehicles for ADA paratransit service $85,000 2007
YCT18079 Facility Equipment Purchase equipment for maintenance facility $12,500 2007
YCT18080 Safety and Security Safety and security improvements for bus stops and facilities $100,000 2007
YCT18081 Preventive Maintenance Yolobus fleet preventive maintenance $1,376,250 2008
YCT18082 ADA Paratransit Operations Operating assistance for ADA paratransit service $187,500 2008
YCT18083 Transit planning Transit service and operations planning and development review $87,500 2008
YCT18084
YCTD Jobs Access & Reverse
Commute Program
In Yolo County, provide JARC operations for Yolo County Transportation
District. $1,507,942 2007
YCT18085 EDO CNG Tank replacement Replace 60 EDO CNG tanks and related hardware in six buses $282,390 2005
Yuba County Caltrans District 3
CAL18240 Marysville Bypass (phase 2)
Construct a new 2 or 4 lane expressway (Marysville Bypass phase 2) from
Route 65/70 split to Route 20, with access control. $158,000,000 2025
CAL18250 Marysville Bypass (Phase 3)
Construct a new 2 or 4 lane expressway (Marysville Bypass phase 3) from
Route 20 to Butte County line, with access control. $70,000,000 2025
Page 22 of 23 4/4/2006

Appendix E
Project List
Completion
Year
Near Marysville - Noble Road to Woodruff Lane - add shoulder and two-way
left turn lane $3,724,000 2007
City of Marysville Dept of Public Works
ID Project Title Project Description Total Cost
CAL18745
SR 70 Near Marysville - Safety
Improvements
CAL15960 Route 70
Widen from 4 to 6 lanes from First St to Ninth St, and widen the approaches
to the Tenth St Bridge $3,000,000 2012
YUB15350 Route 70 Widen B St railroad underpass to safety standards $7,000,000 2013
2002 Pavement Rehabilitation
YUB15690 Project Phase 1 In Marysville, various roads, Phase 1 pavement rehabilitation. $755,000 2008
YUB15700
2002 Pavement Rehabilitation
Project Phase 2 In Marysville, various roads, phase 2 pavement rehabilitation. $425,000 2009
YUB15850
Marysville Hotel Parking
Structure
In Marysville, Downtown Marysville Renaissance Square: construct downtown
public parking garage as part of redevelopment project. $2,980,000 2008
City of Wheatland
In Wheatland, SR 65, N. of 1st St. to S. of Main St.; construct signals and
YUB15710 SR 65 Wheatland Signals pedestrian improvements. $1,200,000 2006
SACOG
YUB15630 Yuba County PPM Plan, program and monitor $63,000 2009
Yuba County Dept of Public Works
McGowan Parkway Interchange
YUB15858 at SR 70 Modify existing Interchange $5,000,000 2010
YUB15360 Route 70 at Feather River Blvd. Construct interchange as part of the Plumas Lake Specific Plan. $22,333,000 2010
YUB15370
SR 70 Algodon Road
Interchange
Near Marysville - south of Algodon Road at Motorplex Parkway and Route 70 -
construct new interchange (Phase 1). $21,000,000 2007
YUB15375
SR 70 Algodon Road
Interchange (Phase 2)
Near Marysville - south of Algodon Road at Motorplex Parkway and Route 70 -
construct bridge for new interchange. $20,000,000 2012
YUB15420 River Oaks Blvd. Construct new north Arterial from Algodon Rd. to Plumas Arboga $6,500,000 2007
SR 65 Interchange at Forty Mile South of Marysville, SR 65 at Forty Mile Road Interchange: modify interchange
YUB15580 Road
ramps to accommodate traffic from the Yuba County Motorplex. $1,000,000 2012
YUB15600
Honcut Road Bridge
Replacement
In Yuba County, Community of Loma Rica, replace Honcut Road Bridge over
Honcut Creek. $2,000,000 2006
YUB15680
Willow Glen Road Pavement
Rehabilitation
In Yuba County, Willow Glen Road from Marysville Road to Frenchtown Road:
rehabilitate roadway. $1,000,000 2007
YUB15720
North Beale Road Pavement
Rehabilitation
In Yuba County, Community of Linda, North Beale Road from Shad Road to
Griffith Avenue, rehabilitate pavement $1,240,000 2006
YUB15848
La Porte Road Pavement
Rehabilitation
In Yuba County, Community of Brownsville, La Porte Road from Willow Glen
Road to Oregon Hill Road: pavement rehabilitation. $750,000 2007
YUB15849
New York Creek Bridge
Replacement
In Yuba County, near Brownsville, La Porte Road at New York Creek crossing:
replace bridge. $750,000 2008
TOTAL $27,430,779,065
Page 23 of 23 4/4/2006

APPENDIX F
INTER-REGIONAL PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION
Capitol Corridor Rail Service
Funded by the State and passenger fares, administered by the Capitol Corridor Joint Powers
Authority (CCJPA), and operated by Amtrak on Union Pacific Railroad tracks, this rail service is
currently operating 12 round trips between Sacramento and Oakland. Stops in the SACOG region
are at Auburn, Rocklin, Roseville, Sacramento, and Davis, with connecting Amtrak bus service to
Grass Valley, Reno, South Lake Tahoe, and many more locations. The focus of the CCJPA is to
deliver safe, reliable, frequent, high-quality passenger rail service that is a viable transportation
alternative to the congested I-80 highway corridor.
The most recent business plan update calls for a continuation of the current 12 round trip trains
between Sacramento and Oakland until October 2006, by which time, it is hoped, the State
financial crunch will have eased and more trains can be added. Operating funds are available to
expand train service to San Jose (up to 7 daily round trips) once the current Oakland-San Jose track
construction project is complete in Fall 2006. The ultimate expansion goal is 16 San Jose-
Sacramento round trip trains per day by 2009.
Since the CCJPA assumed management for the service in October 1998, ridership has increased
172% over the past seven years, catapulting the Capitol Corridor to the third busiest intercity
passenger rail route in the U.S. For federal fiscal year (FFY) 2005/2006, ridership is expected to be
1.3 million passengers (1.4 million projected for FY 2006/2007). Over 40% of the cost is covered
by fares, compared to 30% prior to the CCJPA management of the service.
The CCJPA has many near-term and future plans for capital projects to upgrade the tracks, reduce
travel times, improve schedule reliability, and upgrade stations and parking. In addition, the CCJPA
working with local transportation agencies in the corridor is evaluating the addition of commuter
rail service between Auburn and Oakland that will be integrated with the Capitol Corridor intercity
trains. This would provide a greater level of service to business travelers who live and work in this
corridor".
High-Speed Rail
The California High-Speed Rail Authority has completed a Program Environmental Impact Report
(EIR) for a high-speed link between the San Francisco Bay Area and Los Angeles with a spur lines
to San Diego and Sacramento. The purpose of such a rail line is to serve increasing intercity travel
in California and link all of the major metropolitan centers in the State. The more than 700-mile
system would use a fully-grade-separated, electrified, dedicated double-track rail line with trains
capable of speeds in excess of 200 m.p.h. The travel time between Sacramento and Los Angeles
would be a little over two hours, for an approximate fare of $41. The system is estimated to cost
$33 to $37 billion to build and as of now has no identified funding source. If financing is identified
it could be open by 2020. The Authority states that 68 million of the estimated 253 million trips
made in the corridor (or 27%) could be on this rail system by 2020. In 1997, 1 percent of trips were
made by rail (Amtrak), 36 percent by air, and 63 percent by auto. In our region, the only stop would
109

e in Sacramento, at the existing Amtrak depot in downtown Sacramento. The Sacramento Valley
Station, as it has been renamed, could link the high speed trains with light rail, conventional heavy
rail, and local and intercity bus systems. The Program EIR, adopted at the Authority’s September
2005 meeting, holds open both the UPRR alignment and the California Traction alignment as
possible routes between Stockton and Sacramento. Legislation enacted by the State Legislature in
2005 calls for further study by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) of the
preferred corridor in the San Francisco Bay Area.
110

APPENDIX G
FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION
This 2006 MTP is long-range strategy for the six-county region that addresses future transportation
needs through a set of policies, funding priorities and projects. Addressing the movement of freight
in the region has become an important priority, given the importance of moving goods to support
the regional economy and the traffic, air quality and noise impacts that can result.
Many of the transportation projects listed in this MTP help to meet the needs of freight movement,
as well as assisting with mobility and access needs in general. The SACOG region is home to a
wide range of freight transportation facilities. These include:
Highways: These are the primary routes for connecting major activity centers in the region to each
other, as well as to other areas in the state or the US. Highways include I-5, I-80, US 50, SR 16,
SR 70, SR 99 and SR 160.
Connectors: These are federally designated roads, such as Harbor Boulevard, that connect freight
facilities to major roadways.
Main Line Railroads: Main line or Class I railroad lines in the SACOG region include the Union
Pacific and Burlington Northern Santa Fe. These are the primary rail routes into, out of and
through the region.
Branch Line Railroads: These smaller shortline railroads, such as the California Northern and the
Sierra Northern (Yolo Shortline) in Yolo County serve smaller areas and feed into the Class I
railroads.
Marine Transportation Facilities: The SACOG area includes one marine facility, the Port of
Sacramento.
Air Cargo Facilities: There are currently two air cargo facilities in the SACOG region:
Sacramento International Airport and Mather Field. Although Mather is Sacramento County’s
designated air cargo facility, the industry practice of sending air freight in the cargo holds of
passenger jets means that Sacramento International continues to see a significant amount of freight
traffic.
Intermodal Facilities: These are facilities that connect rail and truck transportation through the
transfer of containers to or from trucks to trains. The region’s only intermodal facility at the Union
Pacific’s Roseville railyard has been closed and moved to a new facility near Stockton.
Challenges and Opportunities for the Region
There are a variety of challenges and opportunities facing freight transportation in the SACOG
region. Listed below is an overview of some of the more significant ones.
111

Trucks: Interstate 5 is considered the “backbone” of the state’s highway system, providing a link
between the Central Valley and the nation’s largest international gateway to trade –the ports of Los
Angeles and Long Beach. It is also the west coast’s only north-south thoroughfare, linking Seattle
with Los Angeles. Interstate 80 provides the main corridor for goods movement between the Bay
Area, Sacramento and the areas east of the Sierra.
This region’s highways were primarily constructed in a radial pattern to connect the central city to
the suburbs. In the absence of a network of inter-suburban highways, more and more truck traffic
is being moved onto arterials. This has become even more pronounced as manufacturing,
warehousing and distribution centers move to the suburbs, and as new developments appear in
areas with limited highway or freeway access and no rail access.
With the passage of TEA-21 in 1997, Congress authorized a 10% increase in allowable truck
weights (from 72,000 to 80,000 pounds), which has led to a 25% increase in road wear by those
trucks. Unfortunately, however, there was no corresponding increase in funding for road
maintenance. While most state highways have been able to hold up to the increased truck weights,
many rural roads and suburban arterials – especially those built to older standards - have
significantly deteriorated.
Railroads: While there are ample economic and environmental incentives for shifting more freight
from trucks to trains, there are several factors that will act against this:
• Much as vehicle miles traveled have increased dramatically while the number of highway
lane miles has remained about the same, freight train miles have also increased significantly
while track miles have stayed about the same.
• Freight train miles are forecast to double by 2020 and double again by 2036.
Railroads are now faced with three choices:
• Lay more track
• Change operating practices and schedules
• Drop the least profitable business
Capital expenditures for railroads make up a larger percentage of revenues than virtually any other
business (currently about 17%). It costs about $3.5 million to construct one mile of main line
railroad track and about $466,000 annually to maintain it. On the other hand, if fuel costs continue
to rise, rail transportation may become more economically advantageous.
Port: The port of Sacramento serves a relatively small niche market for bulk (i.e. noncontainerized)
cargos, faces strong competition from the port of Stockton and will require
significant investments to its infrastructure to compete. A proposal by the Port of Oakland to
operate the port here would likely generate new business and provide additional expertise to its
management. Key investments that will be required to ensure that the port remains economically
viable include:
• Dredging of the shipping channel from a depth of 30 to 35 feet - $50-70,000,000
• Improvements to Harbor Boulevard - $33,000,000 (approximately $13 million funded)
• Rail relocation - $27-41,000,000
• Marine terminal facilities - $20,000,000
112

• Approximate Total - $130-164,000,000
• Other nearby ports (with the exception of Redwood City) all have greater channel depths
(35 – 38 feet).
Strengths:
• The port is in close proximity to the greater Sacramento Valley cargo market
• It has a strategic location near I-5 and I-80.
• It is served by the Union Pacific Railroad and the Sierra Northern (Yolo Short Line)
Railway.
• It has an inland location outside the Bay Area’s congestion.
Weaknesses:
• This area comprises a relatively small local market for heavy bulk goods.
• There are multiple nearby competitors.
• The port is in an upriver navigation location with a shallow channel.
• The port faces significant financial issues and has a lack of business diversity.
• A major threat to the port is the encroaching residential development.
Airports: Air cargo has been forecast to increase 5.4% a year through 2020, compared to 4.1% a
year for air passenger traffic. By 2025, the volume of international air cargo is expected to double
or even triple statewide.
In 2004, 98.8% of the state’s airborne imports and 93.2% of the airborne exports went through Los
Angeles International Airport or San Francisco International Airport. Both of these airports are
served by extremely congested highway networks and both are seriously constrained in their ability
to expand further. Taken together, these factors would tend to favor moving air cargo operations to
less congested areas, such as Sacramento.
Airport officials here have designated Mather Field as the region’s air cargo hub. This move has
not been entirely successful in shifting the focus of the region’s air cargo operations primarily to
Mather, as a great deal of air cargo still moves in and out of Sacramento International Airport, and
Federal Express has refused to move to Mather. This is not entirely unusual, since a large volume
of international air cargo is moved in the cargo holds of passenger jets. However, upcoming
changes in security regulations could restrict this practice.
Sacramento International Airport is currently the only airport in the Central Valley that offers
international flights and is the only one likely to see a significant increase in the number of them
offered. Studies have shown that there is already sufficient demand to offer daily non-stop service
to London, five day a week service to Frankfurt, and at least weekly service to Asia.
McClellan Airport, another former military air base, is owned but not operated by Sacramento
County. It is conceptually planned to support aircraft maintenance and U.S. Coast Guard
operations. Through economic development agencies, McClellan has been attracting a variety of
private businesses to its facilities. These businesses replace the military activities that formerly
took place at McClellan and have not created a larger “trip attraction” than was previously the case.
113

There are a number other general aviation airports in the SACOG region; however, none qualify as
“major attractors.”
The 2006 MTP includes light rail projects connecting downtown Sacramento to Natomas,
and Natomas to the Sacramento International Airport. The Airport Loop Road project calls
for construction of a two lane, three-mile roadway with the following alignment: Elkhorn
Boulevard at Lone Tree Road, Elkhorn southwest towards Power Line Road, along the
north side of I-5, and loop into the airport, merging with Airport Boulevard. The Placer
Parkway, another project in this 2006 MTP, will also indirectly help to provide more direct
access to the airport to South Placer County residents.
Transit and Rail Connections: A key ground access issue prior to 1997 was the lack of any
public transportation to Sacramento International Airport. YOLOBUS initiated public
transit service between downtown Sacramento, West Sacramento, Davis, Woodland, and
the airport in July 1997. Buses currently leave the airport twice each hour, once in each
direction, making 13-stop loops through the above communities. The service operates
weekdays and Saturdays from 5 a.m. to 10 p.m., with a reduced Sunday and holiday
schedule.
In addition to YOLOBUS service, private carriers such as shuttle services and taxicabs
provide airport access within the region. Scheduled commercial van service also provides
airport service from outlying communities as far away as Chico and the Lake Tahoe Area.
The vans stop at commuter rail stations and provide commuter rail passengers with
continuing service to the airport.
Blueprint and Land Use Considerations: Freight transportation activities have the potential to
both help and hinder the goals of the Blueprint process. The Blueprint seeks to mix residential and
commercial land uses and provide a better jobs/housing balance. However, industrial and freight
transportation-related land uses do not always adapt well to mixed-use development. Residents
living near freight facilities naturally tend to complain about the traffic, noise and pollution
generated there, especially if operations extend to off-peak hours. This is where goals of shifting
freight operations to off-peak hours (to reduce traffic congestion) may come into conflict with
policies that seek to provide a better mix of residential and employment-related land uses. Also,
mixed-use development means that more delivery trucks will be operating in closer proximity to
residences than would be the case in typical suburban neighborhoods.
Rising real estate values, as well as the current emphasis on infill development and a desire to
redevelop older industrial sites (aided by increasingly severe traffic congestion in central cities)
have encouraged many older freight facilities to sell out in favor of more profitable land uses and
relocate to outlying areas - typically with no rail access. This may have the effect of making
available large parcels of centrally-located land for redevelopment – another objective of the
Blueprint. This may also make good business sense to move freight activities to remote locations
where land values are lower and road access is less congested. While this has the advantage of
freeing up land for more valuable types of infill development, the lack of rail access and more
114

emote locations could also result in more vehicle miles traveled by trucks overall, more emissions
and more congestion in the region.
Environmental Considerations and Impacts: The biggest freight-related concern to the citizens
of this region is the impacts of trucks on roads. There is a concern that there are more trucks on the
roads overall and an increasing number of trucks on local streets and arterials. From a
citizen/resident perspective, this increase in trucks on roads brings with it concerns about traffic,
safety, noise and air pollution. The Sacramento region may have an economic opportunity to be a
freight terminal center, but that comes with the tradeoff of environmental and traffic impacts
Air Quality: The emissions from freight movement have been shown to make up 49% of the
nitrogen oxides (NOx) and 36% of the particulate matter (PM) from all mobile sources. Of these,
trucks make up by far the largest contributor, accounting for almost 2/3 of the total freight-related
emissions. Many parked trucks also idle their engines to run air conditioners in hot weather, or
refrigeration units for the load, which adds to these emissions.
Noise: As freight traffic has increased, so has the associated noise level. As the region’s roadways
become more congested, more trucks are moving at off-peak hours (night-time), worsening the
effects of noise. Also of significant concern is the number of nighttime air cargo flights to Mather
Field. An increasing number of studies have linked high levels of noise with a variety of health
problems.
Traffic: Even while total traffic volumes have been increasing, truck traffic has also seen a
considerable increase. As mentioned earlier, all modes of freight transportation have seen
significant growth and are forecast for even more.
Safety and Security: While safety has always been of primary importance in freight operations,
given the magnitude of potential impacts from truck or rail accidents, security has become even
more important since 9/11/2001. New funding through the Department of Homeland Security has
now become available to address this topic, and the California Department of Transportation has a
variety of funding programs to address safety deficiencies.
Truck Parking: In recent years, trucks parking at various and sundry locations has become a
problem. In spite of being at the crossroads of two primary interstates, the Sacramento area is
home to only one private truck stop.
115

APPENDIX H
SACOG REGIONAL AVIATION SYSTEM PLAN
SACOG is involved in aviation planning in three ways. The first involves land use planning for the
areas around public-use airports. In this function, SACOG is known as the Airport Land Use
Commission (ALUC). The second type of involvement is in regional aviation system planning
activities which result in a Regional Aviation System Plan. The third activity involves working
with the airports throughout the region to develop a program of airport improvement projects. The
result is the Regional Airport Capital Improvement Program (CIP), which is submitted to the
Caltrans Aeronautics Program for use in developing its airport project funding proposals.
SACOG is responsible for aviation planning for Sacramento, Sutter, Yolo and Yuba Counties.
Within these counties, there exist one commercial passenger airport, one air force base and thirteen
general aviation airports as follows:
SACRAMENTO COUNTY AIRPORTS
Franklin Field Airport
Mather Airport
McClellan Field
Rancho Murieta Airport
Rio Linda Airport
Sacramento Executive Airport
Sacramento International Airport
Sunset Skyranch Airport
SUTTER COUNTY AIRPORTS
Sutter County Airport
YOLO COUNTY AIRPORTS
Borges-Clarksburg Airport
University Airport (Davis)
Watts-Woodland Airport
Yolo County Airport
YUBA COUNTY AIRPORTS
Beale Air Force Base
Brownsville AeroPines Airport
Airport Land Use Planning: In its role as the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) for
Sacramento, Sutter, Yolo, and Yuba Counties, SACOG has two primary functions. The first
is the protection of public health, safety, and welfare through the adoption of land use
standards that minimize the public's exposure to safety hazards and excessive noise from
nearby airports. The second function is to prevent the encroachment of incompatible land
uses around airports, thereby preserving the utility of these airports in the future.
116

To carry out these functions, the ALUC develops Airport Land Use Compatibility Plans
(CLUPs), which establish planning boundaries around airports for safe building heights,
noise levels, and safety. Land use compatibility standards are also adopted, establishing the
compatibility of individual land uses within each planning boundary. The ALUC works
with local city and county governments to assure compatibility between local plans and the
CLUPs for airport areas.
Individual CLUPs have been adopted for all of the airports located within the region
including Beale Air Force Base, with the exception of the Rancho Murieta and University
airports. Planning boundaries and land use compatibility standards for these two airports are
established by the Airport Land Use Commission Policy Plan.
Under the provisions of ALUC law, CLUPs are required to be based upon airport master
plans, or, in the absence of a master plan, an airport layout plan. Sacramento County
updated its Master Plans for the Sacramento International Airport and Mather Airport in
February 2002. Adoption of these two master plans by Sacramento County triggers ALUC
updates of the CLUPs currently adopted for these two airports. Any significant airport
changes, such as plans for new runways, runway extensions or changes in planned
instrumentation of existing runways, could result in significant changes to the airport
planning boundaries established by the existing CLUPs for these airports.
Regional Aviation System Plan: The Regional Aviation System Plan provides a
comprehensive look at the region's aviation system. It includes a description of individual
public-use and military airports, discusses the major issues affecting aviation, examines the
status of aviation funding programs, reviews future forecasts of aviation activity at
individual airports, and analyzes the capability of the region's airports to accommodate the
forecast future demand. The Plan also includes a series of goals, objectives and policies that
are intended to help guide the ALUC in its ongoing aviation activities. The Executive
Summary of this Plan is included at the end of this appendix.
SACOG periodically updates this Plan, working both with local airports in the region and
the Caltrans Division of Aeronautics. The most recent update was adopted in May of 1998.
Information from SACOG's Regional Aviation System Plan is also incorporated by the
Division of Aeronautics into the California Aviation System Plan.
Regional Airport Capital Improvement Program: SACOG is responsible for updating the
Regional Airport Capital Improvement Program (CIP) every other year. The Regional
Airport CIP consists of a comprehensive list of the capital needs of the region's public-use
airports. Projects typically included in the CIP are such things as runway repair,
construction of airport maintenance facilities, hangars, terminal areas, lighting
improvements, fencing and signage.
SACOG works with the airports to develop the Regional Airport CIP, which is then
submitted to the Caltrans Division of Aeronautics for incorporation into the biennial update
of the Capital Improvement Program Element of the California Aviation System Plan. The
State's CIP Element serves as a guide for current and future airport development in the state,
117

and provides the basis for the development of the Aeronautics Capital Program adopted by
the California Transportation Commission (CTC). SACOG generally initiates updates to the
Regional Aviation CIP beginning in the fall of even-numbered years.
The State CIP Element became a required element of the California Aviation System Plan
(CASP) following enaction of Public Utilities Code Section 21702 (SB 707) in 1990, and
consists of a ten-year list of aviation projects by region divided into two five-year phases.
Projects in the first five-year phase of the CIP identify sources of funding (State, Federal or
both) and the requested funding year. The second five-year phase is a compilation of
projects, without funding source having to be identified.
The CIP process was first implemented in 1993, with the first biennial update occurring in
1995. Updates have occurred biennially since 1995, with the 2001 update being the most
recent. Projects not included in the adopted State CIP will not be eligible for funding from
the State Aeronautics Account, including the State portion of the local match for Federal
Aviation Administration (FAA) Airport Improvement Program (AIP) funding.
The CIP is intended to identify projects eligible for two sources of State funding, the
Acquisition and Development Program and the AIP Matching Grant Program. The AIP
Matching Grant Program assists airports in meeting the local match requirement for AIP
grants from the FAA, providing up to a 5 percent match. AIP Matching Grant funds cannot
be allocated by the State until an AIP grant has been offered by the FAA and accepted by
the airport.
Airport Ground Access Program: The region's major airport is the Sacramento International
Airport, located in Sacramento County north of I-5 and west of Route 70/99. Road access to
the airport is provided by state highways (I-5 and Routes 70/99), and by the internal
circulation system within the airport. The planning, funding, and construction of internal
improvements is undertaken by the airport, outside of SACOG's planning process. Outside
access via I-5 and Routes 70/99 may become more difficult over time as congestion grows
in that part of the region.
[This following reprints the Executive Summary of SACOG's Regional Aviation System Plan].
1. BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION ELEMENT
The Background and Introduction Element is comprised of four major sections: a Regional
Setting; Aviation Issues; Inventory; and Goals, Objectives and Policies.
REGIONAL SETTING
The Regional Setting establishes the context for subsequent portions of the Plan by providing
an overview of the geographic, physical and socioeconomic characteristics of the region in
which the airports are located. Existing and projected population and employment
characteristics of the region are discussed. This section also highlights regional land use
characteristics and provides a broad overview of the regional transportation system.
118

AVIATION ISSUES
The Aviation Issues section looks at the significant issues affecting aviation at the federal, state
and local level, and categorizes these issues under the following subsections:
Environmental: The discussion of environmental issues looks at airport noise problems and the
federal, state and local programs that have been established to address them. The water quality
and air quality impact of airports, and the programs established to address these issues, are also
discussed.
Safety, Navigation and New Technology: The discussion of safety, navigation and new
technology looks at the federal, state and local programs which regulate the safety of the
aviation system. The use of airspace and the existing airspace control system are examined, as
is the status of navigational aids used by the aviation industry. Current aviation research and
development programs are also highlighted.
Air Access to the Region: The discussion of air access highlights commercial and general
aviation service in the region, and examines the rapid growth in regional air cargo volumes.
Issues related to helicopter use are looked at, as are federal, state and local programs to regulate
helicopter use. The missions of the two Air Force bases located within the region, Beale Air
Force Base and McClellan Air Force Base, are discussed, as is the decision to close McClellan
Air Force Base and convert it to civilian use.
Aviation System Requirements: This subsection examines the capacity and expansion
capabilities of airports located within the region, and also discusses the State Capital
Improvement Program process as it relates to the airports.
Planning: The discussion of planning starts with an overview of the regional transportation
planning process in general, and goes on to specifically highlight the aviation system planning
process. This subsection also examines airport ground access issues and transportation system
management measures established for Sacramento International Airport. The airport
comprehensive land use planning process is discussed, as is SACOG's role as the designated
Airport Land Use Commission for the region.
Economics: This subsection examines the considerable economic role airports play as a
stimulus to both the State and local economies. Airport funding programs at the federal, state
and local levels are explored, and the issue of financing ground access to airports is also
discussed.
Partnerships: The partnerships discussion looks at the relationship of the varied local, regional,
state and federal entities that participate in the aviation planning process. Also addressed are the
opportunities for public participation in the planning process, existing aviation awareness and
education programs, and programs in place to provide local assistance.
INVENTORY
This section provides information about each of the region's public use airports, military
airports and heliports. Airport-specific information includes the facilities and services available
119

at each airport, based aircraft and annual operation estimates, and landing and navigational aids.
Information regarding the location of private heliports is included, as is the number of
helicopters based at public use airports. The recent reclassification of the airspace system is
discussed, along with how the region's airports fit into the new system. The rapid growth in air
regional cargo volumes is highlighted, with air cargo tonnages presented for both Sacramento
International and Mather Airports. The status of existing airport land use plans and airport
planning documents is discussed, and the section ends with series of maps showing the adopted
city and county general plan land use designations surrounding each public use airport.
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
The Element concludes with a series of goals, objectives and policies that are intended to guide
SACOG in its ongoing aviation system planning process. These goals, objectives and policies
are grouped into the following categories: aviation safety, aviation noise, aviation system
planning, aviation facilities, airport access and mobility, air quality, military airport conversion,
aviation funding, and public participation.
2. FINANCIAL ELEMENT
The Financial Element describes the history and current status of Federal and State funding
programs, and identifies funding support from these programs that airports within the Region
have received in the past. Also identified are future aviation projects submitted by the airports
for inclusion in the State Capital Improvement Program.
The Financial Element examines the various local funding programs used to fund services and
projects at the Region's airports. Some of the more innovative approaches to airport financing
through private and nontraditional sources are also discussed. The Element ends with an
analysis of future airport needs, as identified in the State Capital Improvement Program,
compared to future Federal and State funding resources assumed to be available to meet these
needs.
A major conclusion of the Element is that Federal and State funding programs do not have
sufficient resources to meet the future funding needs of the Region's public-use airports. While
federal AIP funding appropriations for aviation projects have increased over the past two years,
after experiencing a declining trend for the preceding five years, this increase will likely result
in only marginal increases in the AIP funding levels which have gone to the region's airports in
the past.
At the State level, expenditures for State aviation funding programs have averaged
approximately $6.2 million per year during the period between fiscal years 1990/91 and
1996/97. In recent years the State has been unable to balance the budget with existing revenues
and the legislature has borrowed funds from non-General Fund sources such as the State
Highway and Aeronautics accounts in order to make up the difference. Given the current nature
of the State economy, it is unlikely that significant aviation funding level increases will occur.
Given the gap between Federal and State funding resources and the funding needs of airports,
many airports will have to become increasingly self-sufficient in order to continue operating
successfully. This could result in such actions as increasing airport user fees and lease fees,
120

provided such increases do not put an individual airport at a disadvantage compared to fees
charged at other airports within the local aviation market. Public-private partnership
arrangements may also offer opportunities for providing funds for the development and
operation of airport facilities. In addition, an increasing trend which some airports may want to
investigate is the privatization of various functions at publicly-owned airports, in which public
authorities and private contractors enter into agreements for the operation of airport services
and concessions.
Airports will need to explore a broader range of innovative and nontraditional funding
opportunities than in the past as traditional funding sources diminish. The next few years are
likely to prove challenging for Federal and State aviation programs, airport operators, and
aviation users alike in the effort to maintain airports as effective and efficient components of
the nation's transportation network.
3. FORECAST ELEMENT
The Forecast Element discusses aviation forecasts through the year 2020 for the region's publicuse
airports. Included are forecasts for based aircraft, aircraft operations, pilots, registered
aircraft, and hours flown at general aviation airports. Passenger enplanement and operations
forecasts are also presented for Sacramento International Airport, the region's air carrier airport.
Forecasts of regional air cargo tonnage are also included.
The aviation forecasts contained in the Forecast Element were developed by the consulting firm
of ICF Kaiser. The Caltrans Division of Aeronautics contracted with ICF Kaiser to develop
forecasts for all public-use airports within the State. Two reports were prepared as a result of
the consultants' work: the Central California Aviation System Plan: Interim Forecasts, Caltrans
Division of Aeronautics, October 1996; and the California Aviation System Plan: Interim
Statewide Forecasts, Caltrans Division of Aeronautics, October 1996. The first report focuses
on the CCASP area, and is the source of the data used in the Forecast Element.
The region, as a whole, is forecasted to experience a gradual increase in based aircraft, for a 31
percent increase between 1995 and the year 2020. Total annual operations within the region are
also forecasted to increase between 1995 and the year 2020 by some 36 percent. While the
number of operations at the county level is forecasted to increase during each five-year
increment between 1995 and 2020, some fluctuations in this trend are forecasted for individual
airports.
Forecasts for student and private pilots show that this group comprised the largest pilot segment
in 1995, being nearly three times as large as the commercial pilot segment. This pilot group,
however, shows very little growth over time. By the year 2020, student and private pilots are
forecasted to increase by only 8 percent over 1995 levels.
The commercial pilot group, on the other hand, is forecasted to grow significantly, for a 156
percent increase by 2020. By 2020, commercial pilots will comprise 45 percent of total pilots,
compared to only 25 percent in 1995. Much of this increase will likely be due to increased
commercial operations at Sacramento International Airport, as well as increased air cargo and
corporate operations at Mather Airport.
121

Annual air carrier passenger enplanements were forecasted for Sacramento International
Airport. Both a low and a high enplanement forecast were developed, with the high forecast
reflecting a significant hubbing operation at Sacramento International. The forecasts range from
3,250,000 enplanements in 1995 to 10,898,100 by the year 2020 under the low forecast and
15,908,100 under the high forecast. This amounts to a 235 and a 389 percent increase,
respectively.
Subsequent to the preparation of the consultants' forecasts, Sacramento International Airport
prepared an update to their own forecasts. The airports forecasts go only as far as the year 2005.
The airports forecasts do, however, assume a much slower rate of growth than even the
consultant's low forecast figures during the same period of time.
Commercial airline operations, consisting of both air carrier and commuter operations, were
also forecasted for Sacramento International Airport. As with enplanements, both a low and a
high operations forecast was developed. Starting with a 1995 level of 116,568 operations, the
low forecast for 2020 is 306,268 annual operations, while the high forecast is for 447,080
operations. This represents an increase of 163 percent for the low forecast and 284 percent for
the high forecast. Since the operations forecasts were based primarily upon the passenger
enplanement forecasts, they may be on the high side in light of the airport's more recent
enplanement forecasts.
Forecasts were also made for air cargo. In 1995, air cargo amounted to 57,600 tons. By the year
2020 cargo is forecasted to be at a level of 149,523 tons, representing a growth in air cargo of
160 percent during the forecast period. It should be noted that the forecasts assumed that all
future air cargo operations would occur at Sacramento International Airport, and do not take
into account the fact that a significant number of air cargo companies now operate out of
Mather Airport.
4. SYSTEMS REQUIREMENTS ELEMENT
The purpose of the Systems Requirements Element is to determine the capability of the region's
public-use airports to accommodate the future forecast aviation demand identified in the
Forecast Element. Included is an examination of existing aircraft operational capacity compared
to future operational levels forecast at each airport. Forecast based aircraft are also compared to
the existing and planned aircraft parking capacity of each airport. The ability of the region's air
cargo facilities to accommodate future forecast levels of air cargo is examined. Potential
constraints impacting the future operational and aircraft parking capacities of airports are also
discussed.
The analysis of the capability of airports to accommodate forecast aircraft operations was
performed by comparing the current estimated annual operational capacity of each airport to the
year 2020 operations forecasts. Where the existing operational capacity of an airport exceeded
forecast operations levels at an airport, a capacity surplus was assumed. Conversely, where year
2020 operations forecasts exceeded existing airport operational capacities, a capacity shortfall
was noted.
122

Based upon the level of operations forecast at the region's general aviation airports by the year
2020, it is not anticipated that the operational capacity limit of any airport will be reached.
Moreover, the region's airports are expected to have significant excess capacity, as evidenced
by the fact that the most any single airport's individual capacity used was 58 percent, with most
airports expected to be operating at less than 40 percent of capacity. With respect to aircraft
parking capacity, the majority of the airports are expected to be able to accommodate the
forecasted levels of based aircraft.
While it was assumed that Sacramento International Airport would be operating at below
capacity under the low operations forecast, under the high forecast scenario its existing capacity
would be exceeded. Also, according to the consultants' passenger forecasts for Sacramento
International, the airport's passenger capacity may be reached well before the year 2020.
Fortunately, the airport has a much greater ability than do the general aviation airports to secure
funding necessary for the construction of capacity enhancing facilities. The difficulty general
aviation airports have in being able to secure the funding necessary to maintain existing
facilities, and to construct additional facilities necessary to increase parking capacity, was the
single most significant constraint identified. In addition, land use incompatibilities were also
identified as having the potential to constrain airport capacity.
5. ACTION PLAN
The intent of the Action Plan is to identify actions both SACOG and individual airports should
undertake to both maintain and enhance the existing regional aviation system. The Action Plan
is comprised of two sections. The first section consists of those actions that SACOG can
undertake in fulfilling its role as both Airport Land Use Commission and Regional
Transportation Planning Agency for the Counties of Sacramento, Sutter, Yolo and Yuba. These
SACOG actions are derived from the goals, objectives and policies contained in the earlier
Introduction and Background Element. The second section of the Action Plan is comprised of
specific actions recommended for implementation by the region's public use airports.
123

APPENDIX I
SACOG CONGESTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
The Congestion Management System (CMS) is an important component of the regional
transportation planning process. The first section reviews the federal requirements under the federal
legislative mandate of TEA-21 as it applies to Transportation Management Areas (TMA). The
second section discusses how the SACOG CMS is implemented in the context of the six required
elements identified in federal guidance. These elements are successfully implemented throughout
the SACOG planning process. The third section itemizes SACOG strategies to further improve the
effectiveness of its CMS.
REQUIREMENTS
A CMS is defined as “ … a systematic process for managing congestion that provides
information on transportation system performance and on alternative strategies for
alleviating congestion. “ All reasonable alternatives to expanding capacity for single occupant
vehicles (SOV) must be considered. For TMAs, the CMS shall include the following elements:
1. Process – develop a set of methods to monitor and evaluate system performance, identify
causes of congestion, identify and evaluate alternative strategies, support the
implementation of strategies with data, and evaluate the effectiveness of these strategies.
2. Performance Measures – define parameters to measure the extent, severity, and duration of
congestion and support the evaluation of congestion reduction strategies.
3. System Performance Monitoring – establish program of systematic data collection and
analysis to define the extent, severity, and duration of congestion.
4. Congestion Management Strategies – identify appropriate traditional and non-traditional
congestion management strategies, including additional system capacity only where
necessary.
5. Implementation – establish implementation schedule, implementation responsibilities, and
identify funding sources.
6. Assessment – implement process to assess effectiveness of implemented strategies in terms
of the established performance measures.
FHWA mandates no specific program structure, giving regional planning agencies wide latitude in
implementing this planning requirement. The SACOG CMS is decentralized and closely integrated
into the transportation planning process, as described in detail in the following section.
CMS DESCRIPTION
SACOG has a superior record of implementing the planning principles embodied in TEA-21,
including those specific to CMS. This region’s CMS is closely integrated into the transportation
planning processes. Through these processes, SACOG routinely collects available congestion data,
analyzes those data, and applies these analyses to project evaluation.
124

CONGESTION MONITORING AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES
The CMS closely monitors congestion by collecting data from CALTRANS, other regional
transportation authorities, and local jurisdictions. The most common and useful data are roadway
traffic volumes. Collected by various agencies and local consultants, traffic volumes are readily
converted into performance measures. Other data collected are travel times, turning movements,
and modeled outputs from traffic operations studies. These data are used prominently in the
regional travel model, the preferred tool for evaluating congestion management strategies.
Performance measures used by SACOG include roadway v/c ratio and corresponding level of
service (LOS), and the Congestion Index. LOS is a generally accepted performance measure in
transportation planning. The Congestion Index is a SACOG innovation that measures the amount of
peak period congestion experienced by the region’s travelers. It measures travel conditions for an
entire trip rather than congestion of any specific facility. The Congestion Index is used to measure
system-wide effects and help evaluate plan alternatives.
In cooperation with many local jurisdictions, SACOG is developing a comprehensive framework
for data management with geographic information systems (GIS). This framework includes road
centerlines, parcel level land uses, and demographics. The GIS will be able to manage congestion
data like traffic volumes, giving improved utility for applications. This cutting edge system will
help tie together the disparate parts of CMS into a powerful, unified data source and analysis tool.
A development within the last fiscal year that will assist SACOG with its congestion monitoring
efforts is the County of Sacramento’s Mobility Study. With SACOG’s support and collaboration,
the Mobility Study has made an exhaustive evaluation of present and future congestion on several
vital corridors within the county. Also, Caltrans has agreed to provide periodic and detailed
operations level congestion data for the region’s highway system. Highway interchanges are key
facilities for congestion management. These new data sources will strengthen an already robust
regional CMS.
CONGESTION MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES
SACOG vigorously applies analyses of congestion management strategies to the transportation
planning process. In pursuit of the core principle of CMS, finding alternatives to expanding single
occupant vehicle (SOV) road capacity, this region has an excellent record. In both the 20-year and
5-year planning cycles, aggressive analyses of alternative strategies to SOV travel are consistently
applied. In addition, planning initiatives like the Blueprint Project and the Community Design
Program reinforce the already strong institutional commitment to progressive transportation
solutions that reduce congestion and its negative societal consequences.
The MTP 2025 embodies the SACOG commitment to an active and effective CMS. Federal
guidance notes that a CMS should be integral to the long-range plan and ultimately serve that
process. The MTP 2025 embodies that principle in every way. The ten stated goals of the MTP
encompass those outlined by TEA-21 for a model CMS, thoroughly and inclusively. While testing
plan alternatives, proposed project lists were subjected to rigorous analyses that compared
congestion relief strategies, and alternatives were compared for system-wide congestion effects.
Potential SOV capacity expansion projects were given the highest scrutiny possible with every
alternative mode and other reasonable strategy considered. These planning principles are followed
consistently through plan implementation.
125

Along with monitoring, the Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Plan (MTIP) represents the
short-term facet of the CMS. All proposed MTIP projects must already be in the approved MTP,
and relevant technical analyses are brought forth for further consideration. Therefore, congestion
relief strategies are fully considered in project implementation. The MTIP development process is
coordinated with and flows from the MTP. Also, the region is known for innovative TCM projects
like the diesel engine exchange program.
The Community Design Program provides a new and creative method for considering congestion
management strategies. The MTP 2025 set aside $500 million for this program, which has
undergone one funding cycle so far. Projects that further the principles of “smart growth” are
eligible, including innovative transportation projects that give alternatives to single-occupant
vehicle travel. SACOG and its CMS have backed up goals and principles with concrete and fully
committed resources.
The Blueprint Project is another example of innovation as SACOG strives to meet and exceed the
planning requirements of TEA-21 and its CMS component. Blueprint is an unprecedented effort to
make the land use/transportation connection relevant to regional transportation planning. This
enormous planning effort includes the use of cutting edge technologies and modeling tools. These
tools help divine how land development affects congestion management strategies, thus greatly
informing future choices in how we reduce congestion. The CMS is greatly aided by the practical
testing of the new analysis techniques pioneered in Blueprint.
IMPLEMENTATION AND ASSESSMENT
The MTIP and MTP, with its CMS component, provide a unified and continuous link between
planning, project development, funding, and implementation. SACOG has a proven record of
delivering projects that effectively mitigate congestion in this region, meeting or exceeding agency
goals for programming available resources for many consecutive years. Where planning horizons
overlap, the MTP projects are the MTIP projects, and so the detailed analyses conducted for the
MTP hold true for the MTIP cycle. Programmed improvements are always taken into account,
usually as a base condition, when conducting system-wide congestion analysis or comparisons of
plan alternatives.
FUTURE IMPROVEMENTS
SACOG strives to improve all aspects of the planning process, including the CMS. Starting in
2004/2005, this agency will produce an Annual Congestion Report to the Regional Planning
Partnership (RPP). SACOG staff will collect all available congestion data in the region, subject
these data to thorough analyses, and publish results for general dissemination. The report will
enhance the CMS in the following ways:
• Through the RPP, better inform our local policy makers on current trends in system
congestion and allow this information to quickly inform other analyses
• Give SACOG members a conduit for making suggestions on how to improve the CMS in a
timely and efficient manner
126

• Enhance congestion monitoring by creating central databases for congestion information
and providing greater consistency and continuity in these efforts
SACOG intends to make an early amendment to the OWP for inclusion of this program item.
SUMMARY
The CMS is an important and valued facet of SACOG’s regional planning program. Consistent
with federal guidance, SACOG has chosen a more decentralized model where the CMS is closely
integrated into the MTIP and MTP. The MTIP and MTP, with its CMS component, provide a
unified and continuous link between planning, project development, funding, and implementation.
All required elements of a CMS for a TMA are clearly evident in this agency’s planning programs.
Data from congestion monitoring are used to evaluate congestion management strategies for
projects and plan alternatives. New planning programs like Blueprint and Community Design
further demonstrate SACOG’s strong commitment to the letter and intent of TEA-21. With the
Congestion Report as an example, SACOG will always strive to improve the CMS and better
inform the planning process.
127

APPENDIX J
TRANSPORTATION MODELS AND TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
[Please note: This appendix was originally prepared for the MTP 2025 and has been updated to
reflect a few changes in the travel model and a significant change in the emissions model used in
the air quality conformity analysis. The 2006 MTP project list relies upon the modeling and
technical analysis from the MTP 2025. For the 2006 MTP, the same model runs were reproduced
in the updated model set.]
The technical analysis relies on travel demand forecasting models to project the travel conditions
and system performance of the various options. The SACMET model covers the entire 6-county
SACOG area, including both air quality areas. This model is a mathematical tool that estimates the
general travel choices people will make, based on the primary social, demographic and physical
conditions that affect such choices.
To develop the forecasting model, information on the characteristics of the transportation system is
collected. Roadway and public-transit systems were studied to collect accurate technical
descriptions of how these systems operate, and the conditions in which they operate. Data also were
collected by conducting surveys of the region's residents, to determine the types of trips being made
and the factors that affect those trips-demographic characteristics and the constraints of the
transportation system, for example. Using all this information, a mathematical model of travel
behavior was developed, relating to the types of trips made, frequency of trips, length of trips, time
of day that trips are made, and the mode of travel used for the trip. When these relationships are
applied to the entire region, traffic volumes and public-transit ridership can be estimated for a base
year, meaning the current year or a very recent year. Estimates are compared to actual data that are
prepared from the base year, to determine the accuracy of the model. When the model is judged to
be accurate within acceptable standards, it then can be used to forecast travel patterns for a future
year, given some assumptions about the size of the population in that future year, the places where
new housing and businesses are built, the size of the employment base in that year, and the
transportation improvements we expect to take place by that year.
LIMITS OF FORECASTING MODELS
The forecasting model is developed within the limits of available data and within the limits of our
understanding about how people make their travel choices. All of the various choices that people
make every day cannot be replicated or forecasted with exact precision. We attempt to understand
the major travel choices, and the primary factors that affect these choices.
Also, we cannot replicate all the travel conditions that occur on the roadways and on the publictransit
system. We limit our analysis and forecasts to the average weekday, including peak and offpeak
travel periods. Traditionally, roadway design decisions are made to accommodate average
conditions, not to accommodate extreme traffic loads like Friday afternoon traffic before Christmas
near a shopping mall. Another reason we limit the process to average conditions is that it is more
difficult, time-consuming, and costly to collect the necessary data for unusual or peak conditions.
Another limitation of the model is that it assumes no traffic accidents, breakdowns, spilled loads,
lanes closed for maintenance, or other temporary bottlenecks. The timing, severity, duration, and
128

location of these incidents makes them too difficult to analyze within the constraints of a largescale
regional model, but we do know that as traffic levels near roadway capacity, incidents
become far more disruptive for longer periods of time.
Many researchers and practitioners contend that increases in the roadway system cause, or induce,
additional vehicle travel. Our analysis shows that more road capacity may change travel patterns
and increase overall vehicle miles of travel, but do not necessarily "induce" people to make extra
trips just because driving is easier. Our analysis does address many of the relationships of vehicle
travel demand. However, the effect of transportation improvements on the amount and location of
residential and commercial development is not included because the future land uses are assumed
to remain constant across all options.
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
For the 2006 MTP, the same performance measure that were used in the MTP 2025 were again
utilized. Listed below are the characteristics of these measures.
Roadway measures relate to travel in vehicles on the roadway system. These measures include the
number of vehicle trips made on a typical weekday, vehicle miles of travel (VMT), and vehicles
hours of travel (VHT). Both the total amount of VMT and VHT are reported as well as travel under
highly congested conditions. Levels of service (or LOS), a widely used measure, is designated "A"
through "F". LOS A is uncongested, free-flow conditions and F is the most congested conditions.
Roadways at LOS F means roadways are forecasted to have traffic volumes at or above their
capacity. The use of this performance measure is a way of indicating how much travel will occur in
congested conditions.
A second category of congested travel is reported. The Congestion Index is measure of the amount
of peak period roadway travel under LOS E or F conditions experienced by the region's residents.
The difference from roadway measures is that the Congestion Index measures a person's travel
conditions on their entire trip rather than the conditions on any particular road or street. The Index
is scaled so that the year 2000 peak period regional average is 100. The Index is calculated for the
various communities throughout the region in the present and future forecasts. Each community can
be evaluated in several ways: a) against the regional average, b) against other communities, and c)
from the present to the future years.
Mode choice measures relate to the mode of travel chosen for a trip. Travel modes include solo
driving, ridesharing, public transit, and non-motorized modes (bicycling and walking).
Emissions measures are estimates of the total regional emissions from on-road mobile sources.
Emissions estimates are provided for four pollutants-oxides of nitrogen (NOx), reactive organic
gases (ROG), particulate matter (PM-10), and carbon dioxide (CO2). Ozone is formed from NOx
and ROG, PM-10 is small dust particles that can have respiratory effects, and CO2 is a major
greenhouse gas related to global warming.
The Air Resources Board's emission model EMFAC2002 was used to calculate the emissions,
using SACOG's travel forecasts. EMFAC2002 is the newest on-road emissions model from the Air
Resources Board, and includes the latest available data on a range of factors such the trends in
129

vehicle ownership. It also includes the latest research on the technological and climatic impacts on
emissions.
The plan meets both federal and state air quality mandates. The federal requirements-through air
quality conformity analysis-have to do with keeping projected emissions within certain allowable
levels in specific future years. Because there are so many forecasts required in this analysis, it is
published in a separate report. The analysis, available from SACOG, shows that the plan meets
federal conformity requirements, with emissions within the allowable levels in each of the future
milestone years.
The California Clean Air Act calls for reducing the rate of growth in vehicle trips and vehicle miles
traveled (VMT), particularly in comparison with the projected population growth rate. The
following shows how the 2006 MTP performs in meeting the standards of the California Clean Air
Act.
PERFORMANCE OF THE 2006 MTP RELATING TO THE CALIFORNIA
CLEAN AIR ACT REQUIREMENTS
Growth in daily vehicle trips, 2006-2027 33.5%
Growth in daily vehicle
miles of travel, 2006-2027 33.3%
Growth in population,
2005-2027 37%
The 2006 MTP succeeds in keeping growth in vehicle trips (33.5 percent ) and growth in VMT
(33.3 percent) to a lower rate than the population growth (37 percent) during the 22-year planning
period.
130

APPENDIX K
REFERENCES
(in chronological order)
California Air Resources Board and five local air districts, 1994 State Implementation Plan,
November 15, 1994.
Sacramento Area Council of Governments. Intelligent Transportation Systems Early Deployment
Planning Study. June 1996.
"Fifty Years of Growth: Fifty Years of Choices" video produced for SACOG by JHME Associates,
October 1999.
Sacramento Area Council of Governments, TRAVELING INTO OUR FUTURE; a Report on the
Regional Transportation Forum held November 5, 1999, at the Sacramento Convention Center on
November 5, 1999.
Accord Associates, 2025 Metropolitan Transportation Plan Update: Report on the Town Hall
Meetings Held January 24-February 2, 2000.
Sacramento Area Council of Governments. Innovative Transportation Strategies: A Resource
Guide. September 21, 2000.
Sacramento Area Council of Governments. Metropolitan Transportation Plan for 2025:
Community Input Plan. November 2000.
Sacramento Area Council of Governments. Metropolitan Transportation Plan for 2025: Analysis of
Study Alternatives. September 2001.
Sacramento Area Council of Governments. Metropolitan Transportation Plan for 2025:
Preliminary Draft. January 2002.
"Metropolitan Transportation Plan for 2025" video, produced for SACOG by Chris Cochran
Productions, January 2002.
Valley Vision, California State University Sacramento, and Sacramento Area Council of
Governments, Sacramento Region Quality-of-Life Index 2002. January 2002.
Godbe Research & Analysis, Survey of Residents Conducted for Sacramento Area Council of
Governments. March 14, 2002.
Sacramento Area Council of Governments. Public Comments Regarding the Metropolitan
Transportation Plan for 2025. As of April 10, 2002.
131

Sacramento Area Council of Governments. Public Comments Regarding the Metropolitan
Transportation Plan for 2025. From April 11, 2002 through April 17, 2002.
Sacramento Area Council of Governments. Metropolitan Transportation Plan for 2025. Adopted
July 18, 2002.
Sacramento Area Council of Governments. Final Environmental Impact Report on the Final Draft
Metropolitan Transportation Plan for 2025. Adopted July 18, 2002.
Sacramento Area Council of Governments. Air Quality Conformity Determination. Adopted July
18, 2002.
Sacramento Area Council of Governments. Community Input Plan for the 2004-05 Interim
Metropolitan Transportation Plan. September 2004.
Sacramento Area Council of Governments. Final Interim Metropolitan Transportation Plan,
2004/05. Adopted October 21, 2004.
Sacramento Area Council of Governments. Metropolitan Transportation Plan 2027 for the
SACOG Region Including an Interim Plan for the Counties in the Sacramento Air Basin. Adopted
July 21, 2005.
Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District, et al. Federal 8-Hour Ozone Rate-of
Progress Plan for the Sacramento Region (Draft Report), September 2005.
132

APPENDIX L
IRR TIP PROJECT
Projects that are listed in the Indian Reservation Road Transportation Program (“IRR
TIP”) are included in the applicable MTP and the MTIP “without further action.”
The Federal Highway Administration, Indian Reservation Roads Program, Chapter 6
(http://www/fhwa.dot.gov/flh/reports/Indian/chapter6.htm) states:
“The IRR TIP is included in the Statewide Transportation
Program (STIP) developed by each State Transportation Agency
without further action. If an IRR project lies within a
metropolitan area, it must be included in the metropolitan area
TIP without further action.”
Title 23, United States Code section 204(a) provides that
“(1) In general. – Recognizing the need for all Federal roads that
are public roads to be treated under uniform policies similar to
the policies that apply to Federal-aid highways, there is
established a coordinated Federal lands highways program that
shall apply to public lands highways, park roads and parkways,
refuge roads, and Indian reservation roads and bridges.”
“(5) Inclusion in state programs. – The approved Federal lands
highways program transportation improvement program shall be
included in appropriate State and metropolitan planning
organization plans and programs without further action on the
transportation improvement program.”
BIA, by its Deputy Bureau Director for Tribal Services, has stated by
letter dated December 16, 2005 to Nicolas H. Fonseca, Chairman,
Shingle Springs Rancheria, that the Shingle Springs Rancheria
Interchange is in the IRR TIP. As stated above, projects in the IRR TIP
are in the MTP and MTIP “without further action” by SACOG. This
project has been included in the ROP SIP analysis and in the conformity
analysis.
No federal, state or local government funds will be used to construct the Shingle Springs
Interchange.

APPENDIX M
SACOG BOARD OF DIRECTORS RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT
135

APPENDIX N
KEY EXCERPTS FROM THE 2006 MTP AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY
DETERMINATION
137

Sacramento Area
Council of
Governments
1415 L Street,
Suite 300
Sacramento, CA
95814
tel: 916.321.9000
fax: 916.321.9551
tdd: 916.321.9550
www.sacog.org
March 27, 2006
Mr. Gene K. Fong, Division Administrator
U.S. Federal Highway Administration
980 Ninth Street, Suite 400
Sacramento, CA 95814-2724
Mr. Leslie Rogers, Regional Administrator
Federal Transit Administration, Region IX
201 Mission St, Suite 2210
San Francisco, CA 94105
Ms. Lisa Hans, Chief
Mobile Sources Section
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
75 Hawthorne Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
Ms. Jody Jones, District Director
Caltrans District 03
P.O. Box 911
Marysville, CA 95901
Re: Transmittal of the Air Quality Conformity Determinations on the 2006
Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) and 2006/08 Metropolitan
Transportation Improvement Program (MTIP) for the Sacramento Ozone (ROG
and NOx) Nonattainment Area, Carbon Monoxide (CO) Maintenance Area, and
Particulate Matter (PM-10) Moderate Nonattainment Area.
Dear Messrs. Fong and Rogers and Mses. Hans and Jones:
The following air quality conformity determinations on the 2006 MTP
(Attachment A), and the 2006/08 MTIP (Attachment B) for the Sacramento
Ozone (ROG and NOx) Nonattainment Area, Carbon Monoxide (CO)
Maintenance Area, and Particulate Matter (PM-10) Moderate Nonattainment
Area are hereby transmitted to you for your review and approval. The SACOG
Board of Directors approved the attached conformity determinations at its
March 16, 2006, meeting.
The attached air quality conformity determinations have been prepared in
accordance with the conformity requirements as published in the federal register
on August 15, 1997, and in accordance with USDOT’s January 2, 2002,
guidance, Revised Guidance for Implementing the March 1999 Circuit Court
Decision Affecting Transportation Conformity (93.109).

nto Area
f
ents
1415 L Street,
Suite 300
Sacramento, CA
95814
tel: 916.321.9000
fax: 916.321.9551
tdd: 916.321.9550
www.sacog.org
Conformity Approach
The last conformity determination for the Sacramento ozone nonattainment area, CO attainment
area and PM-10 moderate nonattainment area was adopted by the SACOG Board of Directors on
November 20, 2002 (93.114).
The conformity test for the Sacramento ozone nonattainment, CO attainment, and PM-10
moderate nonattainment area will consist of a quantitative emissions analysis (budget test for
ozone and CO and a build vs. no-build test for PM-10), as shown in Attachment C.
Plan and MTIP Status
The SACOG Board of Directors is scheduled to adopt the 2006 MTP and the 2006/08 MTIP at
its March 16, 2006, meeting (93.104).
Financial Constraint
The 2006 MTP and the 2006/08 MTIP are fiscally constrained consistent with 23 CFR 450
(93.108).
Inclusion of All Federal and Non-Federal Regionally Significant Projects
The 2006 MTP for 2025 and the 2006/08 MTIP include all federal and non-federal regionally
significant projects expected to occur in the Sacramento nonattainment (ozone), maintenance
(CO) and moderate (PM-10) areas, along with projects expected to be built in the Yuba/Sutter
attainment area [93.122(a)(1)].
Latest Planning Assumptions
The emission estimates developed for this conformity determination were based on the latest
population and employment projections for the Sacramento and Yuba/Sutter areas that were
adopted by the SACOG Board of Directors on December 16, 2004 (93.110).
Latest Emissions Model
One of the critical inputs into determining emissions associated with the 2006 MTP and the
2006/08 MTIP is the selection of which emissions factors to use. For purposes of this
conformity determination, EMFAC 2002 was used, as provided to SACOG by the California Air
Resources Board (CARB) along with revised emission factors dated January 24, 2002, which
were also provided to SACOG by CARB (93.111). Quantitative emissions analyses have been
prepared for the Sacramento nonattainment, maintenance, and moderate areas, as shown in
Attachment C.

nto Area
f
ents
1415 L Street,
Suite 300
Sacramento, CA
95814
tel: 916.321.9000
fax: 916.321.9551
tdd: 916.321.9550
www.sacog.org
Modeling Documentation
A complete description of the Sacramento SACMET model that was used by SACOG to develop
the quantitative emissions analyses included with this submittal is available upon request
(93.111).
Estimates of regional transportation-related emissions for serious, severe, or extreme ozone
nonattainment areas that are used to support conformity determinations must be made in
accordance with the procedures laid out under section 93.122 (b) (1) through (3) of the August
15, 1997 Federal Register. The Sacramento ozone nonattainment area is currently classified as a
moderate ozone nonattainment area. SACOG’s SACMET Travel Demand model, which was
used to develop transportation-related emissions for the Sacramento nonattainment areas,
currently meets all the modeling requirements, as set forth in the August 15, 1997, Federal
Register. The SACMET model was used to develop ROG, NOx and CO emissions for the
Sacramento ozone nonattainment and carbon monoxide maintenance areas, respectively. The
EPA’s AP-42 emissions model was used to develop PM-10 emissions for the PM-10
nonattainment area (Sacramento County only).
Consultation
Review of this document is part of the conformity consultation process as required under section
93.105 (a) (2), 93.105 (c) (1), and 93.105 (e) and is consistent with the public involvement
procedures under 23 CFR 450 (93.112). This air quality conformity analysis was circulated for
thirty days to give all affected parties an opportunity to comment. Copies of all comments, along
with our responses, are included in Attachment D.
Over the last year, the Regional Planning Partnership (Partnership), a committee established by
the SACOG Board of Directors to review all conformity determinations and assumptions, was
asked to review and approve a set of assumptions for use in future conformity determinations.
Those assumptions have been incorporated into these conformity determinations.
Transportation Control Measures
SACOG has prepared status reports on the implementation of transportation control measures
(TCMs) contained in SACOG’s 1982 Air Quality Plan (AQP) and 15% Rate-Of-Progress (ROP)
Plan. These status reports were last submitted with SACOG’s April 28, 1994, conformity
submittal that was approved by Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Federal
Transit Administration (FTA) on August 16, 1994. The information contained in those
documents has not changed since that submittal. Therefore, copies of those documents will not
be transmitted with this submittal.
In summary, the 1987 report written by the EPA concluded "that, in general, most of the
agencies that committed to carrying out measures under the 1982 Air Quality Plan (AQP) have
fulfilled those commitments and, in many cases, have taken actions which go beyond their 1982

nto Area
f
ents
1415 L Street,
Suite 300
Sacramento, CA
95814
tel: 916.321.9000
fax: 916.321.9551
tdd: 916.321.9550
www.sacog.org
Plan commitments." The EPA did, however, point out that not all measures had been fully
implemented by 1987. Since 1987, jurisdictions included in the 1982 AQP have fully
implemented all of their plan commitments, and in many cases, jurisdictions have gone beyond
their plan commitments, either through strengthening of existing measures or adoption of new
measures, as documented in the TCM status report.
Air Quality Emissions Analysis
In order for SACOG to make conformity determinations on the 2006 MTP and the 2006/08
MTIP, a quantitative emissions analysis must be performed for the Sacramento air quality
planning areas. SACOG has completed a quantitative emissions analysis for Reactive Organic
Gases (ROG) and Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) for the Sacramento ozone nonattainment areas, CO
maintenance area and PM-10 moderate area, as shown in Attachment C.
Years of Analysis - SACOG prepares estimates of emissions for the Sacramento air quality
planning areas for the analysis years described below. Estimates of emissions are prepared in
accordance with the conformity regulations as published in the August 15, 1997 Federal
Register.
The analysis years of 2008, 2010, 2013, 2018, 2020, and 2027 were chosen for the Sacramento
air quality planning areas because 2008 represents an ozone budget year under the Rate-Of-
Progress State Implementation Plan (ROP/SIP) and the first analysis year for PM10; 2010
represents one of the two milestone years for CO and is the first ozone milestone year and is also
no more than 10 years from the calibration year of the transportation model (2000 is the
calibration year for SACOG’s current transportation model – 93.122(b)(1)(i); 2013 is the current
attainment date for ozone; and 2018 is a milestone year for CO and PM10. The year 2020 was
chosen because it represents an horizon year as specified under section 93.106 (a)(1). The year
2027 is used because it represents the last year of the transportation plan’s forecast period and,
therefore, is required to be an emission analysis year, as specified under section 93.106 (a)(iv) of
the conformity regulation.
Analysis Techniques - The analysis techniques that were used for generating Reactive Organic
Gases (ROG), Nitrogen Oxides (NOx), and Carbon Monoxide (CO) emissions for this
conformity submittal are documented in Attachment C. Specifically, SACOG employed its
"SACMET" travel demand model for the Sacramento ozone nonattainment area to generate trips
and daily vehicle miles traveled (VMT) for each alternative scenario. The outputs from the
SACMET model were then inputted into a PC-based version of the Direct Travel Impact Model
(DTIM), which is used to generate emissions. One of the critical inputs into the DTIM is the
selection of emission factors. For this analysis, SACOG used EMFAC2002, as provided to us by
the CARB.
PM-10 Analysis - In addition to the above pollutants analyzed, SACOG also performed a PM-10
analysis for the Sacramento PM-10 nonattainment area. The methodology employed (AP-42)

nto Area
f
ents
1415 L Street,
Suite 300
Sacramento, CA
95814
tel: 916.321.9000
fax: 916.321.9551
tdd: 916.321.9550
www.sacog.org
was provided to SACOG by the EPA. Emission projections of PM-10 were made for the years
2008, 2018, and 2027, as shown in Attachment C.
Transit Policies and Ridership
Prior to any transportation conformity modeling, SACOG incorporates any changes to fares or
levels of service to the transit operating systems within the Sacramento and Yuba/Sutter planning
areas for conformity [93.110 (c)]. There have been no significant changes to the fares or levels
of service since the last conformity submittal. The last conformity determinations for the
Sacramento ozone nonattainment area, CO attainment area, PM-10 moderate, and Yuba/Sutter
ozone nonattainment areas were adopted by the SACOG Board of Directors on June 20, 2002
(93.114).
On September 1, 2005, the Sacramento Regional Transit Board of Directors approved a phased
fare increase effective September 1, 2005, along with some minor reductions in bus service. The
first phase of the new fare included an increase in the basic fare from $1.50 to $1.75, plus a new
$.25 transfer charge, an increase in the monthly pass from $60 to $80, and an ADA/Paratransit
fare increase from $3.00 to $3.25. It is not known at this time whether or not the fare increase
will adversely affect ridership.
Transit ridership within the SACOG conformity areas has increased slightly from approximately
36.99 million in FY 2003-04 to approximately 37.54 million in FY 2004-05. This represents an
increase in ridership of approximately 1.2%. The following chart shows the changes in ridership
from FY 2003-04 to FY 2004-05 for the major transit systems within the SACOG conformity
planning areas.
03/04 04/05
Major Transit Operators within the Actual Actual
Sacramento Air Quality Planning Areas Ridership Ridership
Regional Transit Light Rail 11,022,004 12,008,620
Regional Transit Bus System 19,446,782 18,929,374
Yolobus 1,215,615 1,245,120
Roseville Transit 391,502 390,190
Paratransit 650,616 723,345
Unitrans 3,450,060 3,416,432
Folsom 161,552 157,973
Yuba/Sutter
Yuba/Sutter Transit Authority 652,529 675,324
Total Ridership 36,990,660 37,545,648

nto Area
f
ents
1415 L Street,
Suite 300
Sacramento, CA
95814
tel: 916.321.9000
fax: 916.321.9551
tdd: 916.321.9550
www.sacog.org
The MTP for 2025 includes a number of goals supporting transit, and they are listed below:
Develop a fully-integrated, multi-modal transportation system to serve as a catalyst to
enhance the quality of life enjoyed by the current and future residents of the Sacramento
region.
Improve access to goods, jobs, services, housing, and other destinations; provide mobility
for people and goods throughout the region, in a safe, affordable, efficient and convenient
manner.
Develop a transportation system and related strategies that contribute to achieving
healthy air in the region.
Provide affordable, convenient, safe, and integrated travel choices.
Pursue a transportation system that addresses the needs of all people in all parts of the
region and assure that impacts of transportation projects don’t adversely affect particular
communities disproportionately.
Develop the transportation system to promote and enhance environmental quality for
present and future generations.
Influence land use policies to improve access to jobs, services, and housing to everyone
in the region by using market forces and the regulatory process.
Public Participation Process
SACOG’s Community Input Plan outlines the techniques employed by SACOG to help facilitate
public participation during the development of the 2006 MTP, and solicitation of projects for the
2006/08 MTIP. SACOG's Community Input Plan provides for early and continuing participation
in our long-range transportation plans, our project-selection or "programming" process (i.e.,
Federal TIP), and the air-quality "conformity" determination and environmental reviews
associated with these plans and programs.
These conformity determinations were circulated to the public and interested federal, state, and
local agencies and jurisdictions for their review, consultation, and comment for a minimum of
thirty days. Copies of all comments received, along with our responses, are included as
Attachment D.
Resolutions of Adoption for the 2006 MTP and the 2006/08 MTIP
Copies of the resolutions of adoption finding that the 2006 MTP and the 2006/08 MTIP conform
to the 2005 ROP/SIP are included as Attachments E and F, respectively, for your review and
approval. The SACOG Board approved the attached resolutions at its March 16, 2006, meeting.

nto Area
f
ents
1415 L Street,
Suite 300
Sacramento, CA
95814
tel: 916.321.9000
fax: 916.321.9551
tdd: 916.321.9550
www.sacog.org
In summation, we hope that the information provided in this letter, plus the supporting
documentation, will assist in your approval of SACOG's air quality conformity determinations
on the 2006 MTP and the 2006/08 MTIP for the Sacramento air quality planning areas.

nto Area
f
ents
1415 L Street,
Suite 300
Sacramento, CA
95814
tel: 916.321.9000
fax: 916.321.9551
tdd: 916.321.9550
www.sacog.org
If you have any questions concerning this conformity submittal, please call David Young, Senior
Planner, at (916) 340-6232.
Sincerely,
Mike McKeever
Executive Director
MM:DHY:gg
Attachments
cc:
Jerome Wiggins, Federal Transit Administration
Sue Kiser, Federal Highway Administration
Karina O’Connor, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Larry Sherwood, Caltrans District 3
Scott McGowan, Caltrans Division of Transportation Programming
Steve Luxenberg, Federal Highway Administration
S:\Projects 05-06\0301-MTP\MTP 2006\Appendix N - Conformity.doc

nto Area
f
ents
1415 L Street,
Suite 300
Sacramento, CA
95814
tel: 916.321.9000
fax: 916.321.9551
tdd: 916.321.9550
www.sacog.org
TO: Federal Highway Administration
FROM: Mike McKeever, Executive Director
DATE: February 10, 2006
RE: Air Quality Emissions Conformity Analysis on the 2006 Metropolitan
Transportation Plan (MTP) and the 2006/08 Metropolitan
Transportation Improvement Program (MTIP) for the Sacramento
Ozone (ROG, and NOx), Carbon Monoxide (CO) and Particulate
Matter (PM-10) Air Quality Planning Areas
BACKGROUND: Federal regulations require that the Sacramento Area
Council of Governments (SACOG) prepare Air Quality Conformity
Determinations on its transportation plans and programs. The purpose of the
conformity determination is to ensure that SACOG’s plans and programs
"conform" to all applicable federal air quality requirements. Based on guidance
from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) dated August 15, 1997, and
January 2, 2002, conformity determinations must be based on the most recent
estimates of on-road vehicle-based emissions. The emissions estimates must
also be based upon the most recent population, employment, travel and
congestion forecasts from SACOG, acting as the federally designated
Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the Sacramento region.
SACOG has developed an emissions conformity procedure based on the
modeling requirements contained in the August 15, 1997, Federal Register.
These regulations require us to develop a series of forecasting model runs for
the Sacramento air quality planning areas, using our SACMET Travel Demand
models, whenever we prepare a conformity determination. This model uses
estimates of population, employment, and travel patterns for 2000, as the "Base
Year," and future estimates of these same parameters for a series of future
years. The future years are designated as "milestone" or "horizon" years for
certain types of pollutant emissions under EPA regulations. The Travel
Demand Models are used to estimate daily vehicle miles traveled (VMT), in
five-mile-per-hour increments, for each model run. The total number of trips
for each model run is also generated. Daily VMT and total trips from each
model run are then used as inputs to our vehicle-emissions forecasting model,
EMFAC2002 provided by ARB.
DISCUSSION: This memo discusses the results of the emissions analysis for
the 2006 MTP and the 2006/08 MTIP for the Sacramento reactive organic gas
(ROG), nitrogen oxide (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), and particulate matter
(PM-10) air quality planning areas.

Mr. Gene K. Fong, Mr. Leslie Rogers, Ms. Lisa Hans, and Ms. Jody Jones
Page 10
March 27, 2006
A) SACRAMENTO EMISSIONS CALCULATIONS
The following emissions conformity determinations were based upon VMT assumptions as
approved by the Regional Planning Partnership on May 26, 2005 and subsequently agreed to by
both FHWA and EPA (copies of the memo are available on request). This memo documents the
methodology that was used to develop VMT estimates for the current 8-hour ozone Rate-Of-
Progress State Implementation Plan (ROP/SIP) and for any future conformity determinations
under this ROP/SIP.
In order to prepare an emissions conformity analysis on the 2006 MTP and the 2006/08 MTIP,
SACOG prepares estimates of emissions for the Sacramento air quality planning areas for the
following analysis years: 2008, 2010, 2013, 2018, 2020, and 2027, depending on the pollutant in
question. Estimates of emissions are prepared in accordance with the conformity regulations as
published in the Federal Register on August 15, 1997.
Once the analysis years have been selected, SACOG uses its SACMET travel demand model to
generate daily vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and total trips for each analysis year in question
using population and employment assumptions, as shown in the Table 1. The outputs from the
transportation model are then inputted into a PC-based version of EMFAC2002, as provided to
SACOG by the California Air Resources Board (CARB).
Also included in the emission calculations is credit for NOx emission reductions from on-road
mobile source emissions associated with the Sacramento Emergency Clean Air and
Transportation (SECAT) program. On June 30, 2000, the Governor signed the State budget that
included $50 million for the Sacramento region to fund air quality NOx reduction programs. On
May 18, 2000, the SACOG Board of Directors approved $20 million in Congestion Mitigation
and Air Quality (CMAQ) funds to match the governor’s $50 million in general fund revenues.
To administer the program, Assembly Bill 2511 (Assemblyman Steinberg) was signed by the
Governor on September 18, 2000, authorizing the formation of the Sacramento Emergency Clean
Air and Transportation (SECAT) Program.
Since September 2000, SACOG has obligated approximately $46 million out of the $70 million
SECAT program. SACOG has submitted an additional allocation request for $13.1 million in SECAT
funds that the California Transportation Commission (CTC) is scheduled to act on at their April 26/27,
2006, meeting. SACOG anticipates going back to the CTC in the fall of 2006 for the final allocation of
approximately $10.5 million in SECAT funds
1) EMISSION FORECASTS FOR THE 2006 MTP FOR THE SACRAMENTO OZONE, CO
AND PM-10 AIR QUALITY PLANNING AREAS
a. Emissions Budget Test For Ozone (ROG and NOx) and Carbon Monoxide (CO)
Under the emissions budget test, all future year ROG and NOx, emissions associated with the
2006 MTP must be equal to or less than the budgets established in the Sacramento Regional
Nonattainment Area 8-Hour Ozone Rate-Of-Progress State Implementation Plan (ROP/SIP) for
the Sacramento ozone nonattainment and for CO emissions less than the CO maintenance

Mr. Gene K. Fong, Mr. Leslie Rogers, Ms. Lisa Hans, and Ms. Jody Jones
Page 11
March 27, 2006
budgets established in the 2004 Revision to the California State Implementation Plan for Carbon
Monoxide, January 30, 2006.
As can be seen from Table 2, ROG, NOx and CO emissions associated with the 2006 MTP are
less than the budgets contained in the SIPs for the Sacramento nonattainment areas for all future
years. Under the conformity regulations, as long as future year emissions associated with the
2006 MTP, including any amendments, are equal to or less than the budgets contained in the
ROP/SIP, we have met the emissions budget test under the conformity regulations. As can be
seen from Table 2, we have met the budget tests for ROG, NOx and CO emissions.
b. Build vs. No-Build Test For PM-10
Under the Build vs. No-Build test for PM-10, PM-10 emissions must either be less in the future
when compared against the Base Year or less in the “2006 MTP” (MTP) vs. “No-2006 MTP ”
(No MTP). Table 3 shows that PM-10 emissions are projected to increase significantly in future
years. The reason for the increase in PM-10 emissions in the future is because of the
methodology used to project PM-10 emissions. We are required to use EPA’s PM-10
forecasting methodology (AP-42), which relies solely on daily VMT. With daily VMT projected
to increase significantly in the future, so will PM-10 emissions. However, the conformity test for
PM-10 requires that either of two tests be met: either the “MTP” results in less emissions than
the “No-MTP” scenario in future years, or the future year emissions are less than the 2000 Base
Year levels. In our case, the “MTP” yields less PM-10 emissions in the future than the “No-
MTP” scenario, so one of the tests is met and, therefore, we have met the conformity test for
PM-10 for the 2006 MTP.
2) EMISSION FORECASTS FOR THE 2006/08 MTIP FOR THE SACRAMENTO OZONE, CO
AND PM-10 AIR QUALITY PLANNING AREAS
a. Emissions Budget Test For Ozone (ROG and NOx) and Carbon Monoxide (CO)
Under the emissions budget test, all future year ROG, NOx, and CO emissions associated with
the 2006/08 MTIP must be equal to or less than the budgets established in the SIPs for the
Sacramento ozone nonattainment and CO maintenance areas.
As can be seen from Table 2, ROG, NOx and CO emissions associated with the 2006/08 MTIP
are less than the budgets contained in the SIPs for the Sacramento ozone nonattainment and CO
maintenance areas for all future years. Under the conformity regulations, as long as future year
emissions associated with the 2006/08 MTIP are equal to or less than the budgets contained in
the SIPs, we have met the emissions budget tests under the conformity regulations. As can be
seen from Table 2, we have met the budget tests for ROG, NOx and CO emissions.
b. Build vs No-Build Test For PM-10
Under the Build vs No-Build test for PM-10, PM-10 must either be less in the future when
compared against the 2002 Base Year or less in the “2006/08 MTIP” (MTIP) vs. “No 2006/08
MTIP” (No-MTIP). Table 4 shows that PM-10 emissions are projected to increase significantly

Mr. Gene K. Fong, Mr. Leslie Rogers, Ms. Lisa Hans, and Ms. Jody Jones
Page 12
March 27, 2006
in the future. The reason for the dramatic increase in PM-10 emissions in the future is because
of the methodology used to project PM-10 emissions. We are required to use EPA’s PM-10
forecasting methodology (AP-42), which relies solely on daily VMT. With daily VMT projected
to increase significantly in the future, so will PM-10 emissions. However, the conformity test for
PM-10 requires that either of two tests be met: either the “2006/08 MTIP” results in less
emissions than the “No-MTIP ” scenario in future years, or the future year emissions are less
than the 2002 Base Year levels. In our case, the “MTIP” yields less PM-10 emissions in the
future than the “No-MTIP” scenario, so one of the tests is met and, therefore, we have met the
conformity test for PM-10 for the 2006/08 MTIP.
c. CONCLUSIONS
The results of the emissions analyses shows that the 2006 MTP and the 2006/08 MTIP meet the
emissions conformity tests as outlined in the August 15, 1997, Federal Register notice for both
the Sacramento ozone, carbon monoxide and PM-10 air quality planning areas.
S:\Projects 05-06\0301-MTP\MTP 2006\Appendix N - Conformity.doc

APPENDIX O
ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE ANALYSIS FROM THE MTP 2025
149

Sacramento Metropolitan Planning Area
MAP 1
Metropolitan Planning Area
County Boundaries
YUBA
COUNTY
Cities
Live Oak
PLACER COUNTY
SUTTER
COUNTY
Yuba City
Marysville
Colfax
80
Wheatland
YOLO
COUNTY
5
99
Lincoln
Rocklin
Roseville
Auburn
Loomis
EL DORADO COUNTY
Placerville
50
South
Lake Tahoe
Woodland
Citrus
Heights
Folsom
Winters
Davis
80
Sacramento
West
Sacramento
Rancho
Cordova
Elk Grove
5
99
SACRAMENTO
COUNTY
N
Galt
10 5
0 10 miles
Isleton

FEDERAL AIR QUALITY
PLANNING BOUNDARIES
Sutter County
(Part)
Yuba County
Placer County
(Part)
Placer County
(Tahoe Basin)
El Dorado County
(Tahoe Basin)
Yolo County
Sutter County
(Part)
El Dorado County
(Part)
Solano County
(Part)
Sacramento County
SACRAMENTO OZONE NONATTAINMENT ARE A
YUBA/SUTTER OZONE NONATTAINMENT A REA
CO MAINTENA NCE A REA (Sacram ento Urbani zed Area)
URB AN AREAS
COUNTY BOUNDARIES
CITY BOUNDARIES
HIGHWAYS and FREEWAYS
10 0 10 20 Miles

Winters
Wheatland
§¨¦ !" 80
99
Auburn
Lincoln
Rocklin
§¨¦ !" 49
5 Loomis
Roseville
Citrus
Heights
Woodland
Folsom
Sacramento
§¨¦ 505
!" 65
!" 70 !" 16
!" 113 !" 193 !" 49
!" 49
!" 99 !" 99
!" 99 !" 193
!" 113 !" 113 Rancho
Cordova
Davis
!" 16 West
Sacramento
§¨¦ 5 §¨¦ 5
Yuba City-Marysville Inset
Prolonged Stop-and-Go Traffic
Slow Traffic
Typical Urban Traffic
Sacmet Highways and Roads
Rivers and Lakes
5 2.5 0 5 Miles
Map 3
.
Traffic Congestion
in 2005 Peak Weekday
Elk Grove
Galt
!" 99 !" 20
!" 70
!" 20
!" 99 !" 70

N
Sutter
Yuba
Wheatland
.-, 80
"! 113 "! 99 "! 70
"! 65
Placer
Lincoln
Auburn
.-, 5 .-, 5
Yolo
Roseville
Rocklin
Loomis
El Dorado
Placerville
Woodland
"! 193
Citrus Heights
"!
Folsom
50
Rancho
Cordova
Sacramento
"!20
"! 99
.-, 505 "! 113 "! 49
Winters
Davis
Traffic Congestion in 2027
Peak Weekday
Prolonged Stop-and-Go Traffic
Slow Traffic
Typical Urban Traffic
Rivers and Lakes
Major Highways and Roads
5 0 5 10 15 Miles
West Sacramento
Sacramento
Elk Grove
Galt
Yuba City-Marysville Inset
"! 99 "!70
"! 20
"!20

P r o j e c t s — 2 0 0 6 M e t r o p o l i t a n T r a n s p o r t a t i o n P l a n M A P 5
New or widened expressways, freeways or carpool lanes by 2015
New or widened expressways, freeways or carpool lanes by 2027
Bus or Rail by 2015
Rail by 2027
Light Rail Currently under Construction
New or Revised Interchanges
N
New Connectors, Bypasses, and Bridges by 2015
New Connectors, Bypasses, and Bridges by 2027
(unspecified alignments)
Live Oak
Route 70
Marysville Bypass
80
Yuba City
Marysville
Route 65
Wheatland Bypass
Colfax
Route 65
Third Bridge
Route 99
Widening
70
Wheatland
Route 65
Lincoln Bypass
49
Bell Road
Widening Route 49
Bypass
99
Route 70
Freeway
65
Placer Parkway
Lincoln
Auburn
Commuter Rail
Auburn – Sacramento
– Davis
505
I-5 / Route113
Freeway Interchange
Winters
5
Light Rail
Natomas – Airport
Woodland
113
Davis
Interstate 80
Carpool Lanes
I-5
Carpool Lanes
West Sacramento
80
Light Rail
West Sacramento
Light Rail
Elk Grove
Freeway Ramp
Improvements
Rocklin
Roseville
I-80
Carpool Lanes
Sacramento
Stockton
Watt
Elk Grove
Citrus Heights
Bus Rapid
Transit
Sunrise
Loomis
Rancho Cordova
South Placer
Connector
50
Folsom
American River
Bridge
Elk Grove -
Rancho Cordova -
El Dorado
Connector
49
U.S. 50 thru
Placerville
U.S. 50
Carpool Lanes
Placerville
50
Sacramento Area
Council of
Governments
5
99
Galt
10 5 0 10 20 miles
1415 L Street Street, Suite 300
Sacramento, CA 95814
tel: 916.321.9000
fax: 916.321.9551
web: www.sacog.org
e-mail sacog.org@sacog.org
Isleton

SACOG
MISSION
Delivering
transportation
projects;
providing public
information
and serving
as a dynamic forum
for regional
planning and
collaboration in the
greater Sacramento
Metropolitan Area.
BOARD
MEMBERS
Heather Fargo (Chair)
City of Sacramento
Rusty Dupray (Vice Chair)
El Dorado County
Harold Anderson
City of Winters
Ruth Asmundson
City of Davis
James Barrington
City of Wheatland
Christina Billeci
City of Marysville
Sherrie Blackmun
City of Colfax
Jeannie Bruins
City of Citrus Heights
Linda Budge
City of Rancho Cordova
Christopher Cabaldon
City of West Sacramento
Darryl Clare
City of Galt
Illa Collin
Sacramento County
Jim Cooper
City of Elk Grove
Ted Gaines
Placer County
Lauren Hammond
City of Sacramento
Mike Holmes
City of Auburn
Kathy Lund
City of Rocklin
Steve Miklos
City of Folsom
Susan Peters
Sacramento County
Judy Richards
City of Live Oak
Rocky Rockholm
City of Roseville
Donald Schrader
Yuba County
Dan Silva
Sutter County
Christopher Stokes
City of Isleton
Helen Thomson
Yolo County
Marian Washburn
City of Placerville
Jody Jones
(Ex-Officio Member)
Caltrans District 3
MEMBER
COUNTIES &
CITIES
El Dorado County
Placer County
Sacramento County
Sutter County
Yolo County
Yuba County
City of Auburn
City of Citrus Heights
City of Colfax
City of Davis
City of Elk Grove
City of Folsom
City of Galt
City of Isleton
City of Lincoln
City of Live Oak
Town of Loomis
City of Marysville
City of Placerville
City of Rancho Cordova
City of Rocklin
City of Roseville
City of Sacramento
City of West Sacramento
City of Wheatland
City of Winters
City of Woodland
City of Yuba City
Tom Cosgrove
City of Lincoln
Roger Dickinson
Sacramento County
1415 L Street,
Suite 300
Sacramento, CA
95814
tel: 916.321.9000
fax: 916.321.9551
tdd: 916.321.9550
www.sacog.org
David Doolittle
City of Yuba City
David Flory
City of Woodland
Guy Fuson
Town of Loomis

SACOG-06-010
Metropolitan
Transportation Improvement Program
2006/08
Adopted March 16, 2006
Sacramento Area
Council of
Governments
1415 L Street
Suite 300
Sacramento, CA
95814
tel: 916.321.9000
fax: 916.321.9551
www.sacog.org

SACOG
MISSION
Delivering
transportation
projects;
providing public
information
and serving
as a dynamic forum
for regional
planning and
collaboration in the
greater Sacramento
Metropolitan Area.
BOARD
MEMBERS
Heather Fargo (Chair)
City of Sacramento
Rusty Dupray (Vice Chair)
El Dorado County
Harold Anderson
City of Winters
Ruth Asmundson
City of Davis
James Barrington
City of Wheatland
Christina Billeci
City of Marysville
Sherrie Blackmun
City of Colfax
Jeannie Bruins
City of Citrus Heights
Linda Budge
City of Rancho Cordova
Christopher Cabaldon
City of West Sacramento
Darryl Clare
City of Galt
Illa Collin
Sacramento County
Jim Cooper
City of Elk Grove
Ted Gaines
Placer County
Lauren Hammond
City of Sacramento
Mike Holmes
City of Auburn
Kathy Lund
City of Rocklin
Steve Miklos
City of Folsom
Susan Peters
Sacramento County
Judy Richards
City of Live Oak
Rocky Rockholm
City of Roseville
Donald Schrader
Yuba County
Dan Silva
Sutter County
Christopher Stokes
City of Isleton
Helen Thomson
Yolo County
Marian Washburn
City of Placerville
Jody Jones
(Ex-Officio Member)
Caltrans District 3
MEMBER
COUNTIES &
CITIES
El Dorado County
Placer County
Sacramento County
Sutter County
Yolo County
Yuba County
City of Auburn
City of Citrus Heights
City of Colfax
City of Davis
City of Elk Grove
City of Folsom
City of Galt
City of Isleton
City of Lincoln
City of Live Oak
Town of Loomis
City of Marysville
City of Placerville
City of Rancho Cordova
City of Rocklin
City of Roseville
City of Sacramento
City of West Sacramento
City of Wheatland
City of Winters
City of Woodland
City of Yuba City
Tom Cosgrove
City of Lincoln
Roger Dickinson
Sacramento County
1415 L Street,
Suite 300
Sacramento, CA
95814
tel: 916.321.9000
fax: 916.321.9551
tdd: 916.321.9550
www.sacog.org
David Doolittle
City of Yuba City
David Flory
City of Woodland
Guy Fuson
Town of Loomis

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program
Section 1:
Section 2:
Section 3:
Section 4:
Section 5:
Section 6:
Overview of the Interim Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program
Financial Element
Interim 2005/07 Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program Action
Element
Status of Projects from the 2003/05 Metropolitan Transportation Improvement
Program
Projects That Have Been Implemented
Projects That Have Been Removed
Projects That Are In Progress
Grouped Project Listing: Individual Project Information
Glossary of Terms and Acronyms Used in the Interim 2005/07 Metropolitan
Transportation Improvement Program
Appendix A: Expedited Project Selection Procedures
Appendix B: Project Eligibility Determination for Grouped Project Listings
Appendix C: Map of the Sacramento Metropolitan Planning Area and Sacramento Ozone Non-
Attainment Area
Appendix D: Indian Reservation Road Transportation Improvement Program
Appendix E: Public Comments
3

SECTION 1:
OVERVIEW OF THE INTERIM METROPOLITAN
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
4

INTRODUCTION
The 2006/08 Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program (MTIP) is a three-year program
of transportation projects in the six-county Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG)
metropolitan planning area. The federal government requires that it contain all regionally
significant or federally funded projects that are programming funds during the Federal Fiscal
Years (FFY) 2006, 2007, or 2008.
MTIP DEVELOPMENT PROCESS
Preparation of the MTIP and its subsequent amendments is made with input from cities,
counties, transit operators, the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), the El Dorado
County Transportation Commission, and the Placer County Transportation Planning Agency.
The MTIP is the short-term implementation program for the Metropolitan Transportation Plan
(MTP), which is the long-range transportation plan for the SACOG region. The MTP establishes
goals, policies, programs, and projects that will meet the area=s mobility needs and satisfy federal
air quality standards. Inclusion of a project or program in the MTP is a prerequisite for inclusion
of a project in the MTIP. The MTIP and MTP together provide a unified and continuous link
between planning, project development, funding, and implementation.
The MTIP development process for Placer and El Dorado Counties is defined in the Memoranda
of Understanding executed by SACOG, the Placer County Transportation Planning Agency, the
El Dorado County Transportation Commission, and the Secretary of Housing, Business, and
Transportation.
RELATIONSHIP TO STATE PROGRAMMING DOCUMENTS (STIP & FSTIP)
SACOG assigns federal and state funds to carry out projects from the long-range plan, through a
series of documents called Transportation Improvement Programs, or TIPs. The MTIP is just
one of four different kinds of TIPs. Any agency using federal or state transportation funds for
projects or which is constructing a regionally significant project must deal with TIPs.
1. REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM OR RTIP
SACOG specifies projects to receive federal and state funds made available by the California
Transportation Commission, going out five years into the future. SACOG sends the RTIP to the
Commission in December of odd-numbered years, and it serves as an application to use the
federal and state funds for the projects specified.
2. STATE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM OR STIP
The California Transportation Commission (CTC) brings together RTIPs from all over the state
into the STIP, which extends five years into the future. The CTC approves the STIP in March of
even-numbered years, and it authorizes the use of state funds for all the projects included.
3. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM OR MTIP
SACOG specifies projects to receive three types of federal funds granted directly to the region:
Regional Surface Transportation Program (RSTP), Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality
5

(CMAQ), and various Federal Transit Administration (FTA) funds, going out three years into the
future. SACOG sends the MTIP to Caltrans in July of even-numbered years, including both
projects funded directly and projects contained in the STIP, and it serves as an application for all
projects to receive federal funding of any type.
4. FEDERAL STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM OR FSTIP
Caltrans packages MTIPs from all over the state into the FSTIP, which covers three years into
the future, and sends it to the Federal Highway Administration and the Federal Transit
Administration. The federal agencies approve the FTIP by October of even-numbered years, and
authorize the use of federal funds and consideration of federal permits for the projects specified.
The process to prepare and approve this series of four TIPs typically takes a year, with public
review and approval at the local, regional, state and federal levels in sequence, although in 2006
the process has unfolded on a different timeline because of the air quality lapse in Sacramento.
This process involves counties, cities, and transit districts seeking federal funds for their
projects, SACOG selecting which projects to fund, and two state agencies and two federal
agencies reviewing and approving the projects, funding amounts, and schedules for work. From
time to time, SACOG may amend the TIPs, with approval by the other agencies involved, when
projects, costs, or schedules change. The amendment process takes up to four months.
MEETING REQUIREMENTS
The different TIPs described above must satisfy three federal and state requirements:
1. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PLAN
By law, the TIP is used to implement the regional transportation plan (SACOG=s MTP), so all
projects in upcoming SACOG TIPs must come from or be consistent with this plan, with the
priorities expressed in the plan as a guide as to which projects to fund next.
2. FINANCIAL CONSTRAINT
All projects must have enough funding assigned to them to complete work, and the total cost of
projects in the TIP cannot exceed an estimate of the total amount of funding expected to be
available.
3. AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY
SACOG must analyze the projects in the TIP, using a prescribed computer model and process,
and find that those projects, if completed, would not contribute to air pollution that exceeds an
amount specified in the region=s clean air plan, which, in turn, is based on requirements or
standards in federal air quality law. This air quality conformity analysis is done in order to
produce an air quality conformity determination for the TIP.
MTIP PROJECT DELIVERY
For a project to move forward to construction, it must be included first in the Metropolitan
Transportation Plan (MTP) and then in the MTIP, but those steps are more the beginning than
the end of the story. The MTIP authorizes SACOG and state and federal agencies to provide
funding for four phases of actual project work: environmental studies, engineering and design,
acquisition of rights of way, and construction. Once the agency doing the work is ready to start a
6

project or continue to the next phase, it must ask the appropriate agencies to allocate funds to the
project, a process that can take several months.
The MTP focuses on the long term picture, guiding investment of transportation funds 20 or
more years into the future. The MTP lays out a general sequence of improvements and projects,
based on the transportation system needs of the region and what it can afford. The MTP must be
reexamined and updated at least every three years. The MTIP implements the first three years of
the MTP by programming funds from upcoming budgets to projects from the MTP. Usually, a
new MTIP is adopted every two years and is amended in between if new funding becomes
available. (Recently, SACOG has adopted MTIPs more frequently.) Agencies may proceed with
project work once programmed funds have been allocated from the MTIP to the specific project.
Planning and programming thus follows a cycle, repeating every two or three years, closely
linked. In essence, the first three to five years of the long-range plan coincide with the MTIP,
FSTIP and STIP, which roll forward with new programming every two years.
PRIORITIES IN THE MTIP
Built into the foundation of the MTIP is the concept that projects are listed by priority. Projects
listed in the action element of the MTIP are prioritized by year, with the first priority group of
projects scheduled for the 2006 federal fiscal year (FFY) and the second and third priority
groups scheduled for the subsequent two years, respectively. SACOG and project sponsor
agencies work to implement projects in the 2006/08 MTIP in the priority order shown, and will
advance additional projects as financial resources and air quality conformity requirements allow.
UPDATING THE MTIP
There are three ways to modify the MTIP, depending on how significant and how urgent the
alteration is.
1. ADVANCEMENT OF FUNDS (EPSP)
The fastest and simplest way of updating the MTIP is to advance funds on a project within the
three programmed years. In simple terms, if a project has funds programmed in either Federal
Fiscal Year 2006, 2007, or 2008, SACOG can unilaterally allow the agency to obligate out of
either of those years. SACOG adopted an “Expedited Project Selection Procedure” (EPSP) that
explains in detail how this works. It is attached in Appendix A.
2. ADMINISTRATIVE AMENDMENT
Processed in around two weeks, administrative amendments receive SACOG staff review and
require Caltrans approval. Through an administrative amendment SACOG can make the
following types of changes:
a. Advancement of Funds (EPSP)
b. Project Description
c. Funding for Project Phases
d. Fund Type
e. Total Project Cost
f. Splitting and Combining of Projects
g. Lead Agency
h. Completion year
7

Limitations do apply. EPSP we already covered above. Changes to project description must be
consistent with the preferred alternative identified in NEPA process. Also, the limits may change
as long as the distance changed is less than ½ mile if total project length is five miles or less. If
the project is longer than five miles, changes must be less than 10% and not more than 2 miles
past the original limit.
Limitations also apply to project phases and total cost. SACOG cannot administratively remove
or add project phases. However, SACOG can administrative add a phase if non-Federal funds are
being added for “early acquisition” of right-of-way or if the construction phase has already been
funded. If a project cost is less than $10m then SACOG can only alter it within 20% of the total
project cost and can only increase it by a maximum of $2m. If the cost is more than $10m,
changes are limited to 5% of the cost.
3. FORMAL AMENDMENT
The third way to update the MTIP can take as long as four months from beginning to end.
Formal amendments begin when SACOG notifies agencies of a 30-day submittal period. After a
period of review, the amendment goes out for 30-day public review. Shortly after, it proceeds to
the SACOG Board, next to Caltrans, and then jointly to the Federal Transit Administration and
the Federal Highway Administration for approval.
Formal amendments can make the following revisions:
a. Advancement of Funds (EPSP)
b. Administrative Amendment-level changes
c. Project Description (no scope limits)
d. Funding for Project Phases (no funding limits)
e. Fund Type
f. New Phases (no phase limits)
g. Total Project Cost (no limits)
h. Adding a New Project
SACOG makes it easy to update and review projects in the MTIP. SACOG maintains SACTrak,
an online database of MTIP projects. Through the website, https://sactrak.sacog.org, agencies
submit project changes, review projects, and print custom reports.
LUMP SUMS/GROUPED PROJECT LISTING
Both titles used interchangeably, “lump sums” or “grouped project listings” are a way to
simplify the MTIP and are a powerful tool for programming minor, air quality exempt
transportation projects. A lump sum is a listing in the MTIP representing multiple projects that
share the same exempt category. By grouping less-significant projects together, the MTIP can
focus more on larger, more sensitive, and more significant projects. While a lump sum can be
changed using the same amendment criteria above, a lump sum offers some advantages.
First, a lump sum can increase by up to 20% or $2m through an administrative amendment, even
though a project contained in the lump sum may increase by more than 20%. For instance, if a
landscaping project doubles in cost from $500k to $1m—an increase of 100%, that change
8

would normally require a formal amendment. If it is part of a lump sum, it can change
administratively, as long as the change is small within the overall grouped project context.
Second, cost increases exceeding 20% or $2m require a formal amendment, but no 30-day public
review as do other formal amendment changes. That means that if a lump sum project had a
significant cost overrun that needed urgent updating in the MTIP, but missed the cutoff date for
30-day public review, it could still be formally amended.
SACOG cooperates with Caltrans to sort exempt projects into grouped project listings. Together
they take into account scale, cost, public sensitivity, community interest, possession of earmark
funds, etc. There are two categories of lump sums with their own eligibility criteria, transit
projects and all other projects. For more detail on eligibility criteria, refer to Appendix B.
FINANCIAL PLAN
The MTIP Financial Element contains a summary of transportation expenditures and revenues
across the SACOG region. Based on these financial summaries, the Interim 2005/07 MTIP
includes a finding that the program is financially constrained to contain only those projects for
which full funding can reasonably be assumed. The summaries show the amount of funds to be
expended each federal fiscal year and indicate the proposed funding sources. Funding expected
from each funding source is at least equal to, if not greater than, expenditures in each fiscal year.
The financial plan developed for the 2005/07 MTIP is based on the following assumptions and
information from the documents noted:
1. The 2006/08 MTIP is consistent with the financial plan outlined in the 2006 MTP
2. The 2006/08 MTIP is financially constrained by year. Funding shown in later years is
exhibited for information only.
3. The funding assumptions made in developing the financial plan for the 2006/08 MTIP
were considered reasonable at the time this document was adopted by SACOG.
TRANSPORTATION CONTROL MEASURE (TCM) IMPLEMENTATION
As required by federal regulations for nonattainment and maintenance areas, this MTIP gives
priority to eligible Transportation Control Measures (TCMs) identified in the State
Implementation Plan for Air Quality and provides sufficient funds to provide for their
implementation. SACOG has prepared status reports on the implementation of transportation
control measures (TCMs) contained in SACOG=s 1982 Air Quality Plan (AQP) and 15 % Rate-
Of-Progress (ROP) Plan. These status reports were last submitted with SACOG=s April 28, 1994
conformity submittal that was approved by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and
the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) on August 16, 1994. The information contained in
those documents has not changed since that submittal. Therefore, copies of those reports will
not be included in this MTIP document.
In Summary, the 1987 report, written by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) concluded
Athat in general, most of the agencies that committed to carrying out measures under the 1982
Air Quality Plan have fulfilled those commitments and, in many cases, have taken actions which
go beyond their 1982 Plan commitments.@ The EPA did, however, point out that not all
9

measures had been fully implemented by 1987. Since 1987, jurisdictions included in the 1982
AQP have fully implemented all of their plan commitments, and in many cases, jurisdictions
have gone beyond their plan commitments, either through strengthening of existing measures or
adoption of new measures, as documented in the TCM status report.
In addition, the April 28, 1994 submittal included a status report on each of the TCMs that were
included in the 15 % ROP Plan that was submitted to EPA on November 15, 1994. As of June 1,
2000 all commitments contained in the 1982 State Implementation Plan have been fully
implemented. The 1994 State Implementation Plan included a 1.0 ton per day (tpd) reduction in
both Reactive Organic Gases (ROG) and Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) attributable to new
transportation control measures (TCMs) and land use measures by the year 2005. Achieving
these reductions will rely heavily on the implementation of the region=s General Plan policies
dealing with Transit Oriented Developments (TODs) and Pedestrian Oriented Developments
(PODs). To date, only minimal reductions have been achieved from the implementation of these
TCM and land use policies, but the potential emission reductions associated with their
implementation will continue to increase between now and 2013. Many land use projects, to
which these policies have been applied, are not yet built or occupied and thus the emission
benefits have not yet been fully realized. The Sacramento Air Quality Management District has
estimated in their 2002 Milestone Report that emission reductions associated with transportation
and land use policies have achieved 0.14 tpd of ROG and 0.31 tpd of NOx within the
Sacramento ozone nonattainment area, as of May 22, 2003.
INTERAGENCY CONSULTATION AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
The MTIP has been developed under SACOG policies for community input and interagency
consultation procedures. SACOG=s adopted MTIP Community Input Plan ensures the public
adequate opportunity to be informed of the MTIP development and amendment process and
encourage public participation and comment. SACOG has worked closely with Sacramento
Transportation Authority, Yolo County Transportation District, El Dorado County
Transportation Commission, Placer County Transportation Planning Agency, the five local air
districts, the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), local transit operators and local
public works departments in the planning and development of this MTIP. In addition, all of
these groups, as well as the Federal Highway Administration, Federal Transit Administration,
Environmental Protection Agency and California Air Resources Board participate in SACOG=s
Regional Planning Partnership, which actively participates in the development of SACOG=s
MTIP.
The draft 2006/08 MTIP will circulate for a 30-day public review period prior to adoption, and a
public hearing will be held prior to adoption of the MTIP. The draft MTIP is available in
SACOG=s offices, at public libraries throughout the region, and online at www.sacog.org.
10

SECTION 2:
FINANCIAL ELEMENT
11

Financial Plan for SACOG's 2006/08 MTIP
Revenue versus Programmed
Rounded to the Nearest Thousand (x1000)
2004/05
2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 TOTAL
Funds
Programmed Revenue Difference Programmed Revenue Difference Programmed Revenue Difference Programmed Revenue Difference Programmed Revenue Difference
Federal Transit Administration Section Funds
3037 Job Access and Reverse Commute
Program 3,758 3,758 1,310 1,982 673 1,054 1,100 46 609 1,100 491 6,731 7,940 1,209
5307 Urbanized Area Formula Program 20,159 20,159 21,469 21,469* 19,417 22,097 2,680 15,495 23,865 8,370 76,539 87,589 11,050
5308 Clean Fuel Formula Program
5309(a) Fixed Guideway Modernization 3,350 3,350 4,520 4,520* 3,590 3,590 3,877 3,877 15,338 15,337
5309(b) New Starts 26,530 26,530 26,530 26,530
5309(c) Bus Allocation 971 971 2,427 3,274 848 1,000 2,408 1,408 2,500 2,608 108 6,898 9,261 2,363
5310 Elderly & Persons with Disabilities Formula
Program 354 354 742 742 354 1,095 742
5311 Nonurbanized Area Formula Program 55 55 1,102 1,234 132 995 1,281 286 170 1,386 1,216 2,322 3,956 1,634
Federal Funds
Bureau of Indian Affairs
Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality 29,305 29,305 22,169 22,659 490 19,009 22,411 3,402 1,111 26,670 25,559 71,594 101,045 29,451
Demonstration Pre ISTEA, ISTEA, & TEA21 7,881 7,881 40,567 40,567 89,161 89,161 9,428 11,883 2,455 147,037 149,492 2,455
Federal Funds - STIP 16,304 16,304 115,375 115,375 131,679 131,679
Federal Funds - SHOPP 2,930 2,930 97,921 116,621 18,700 47,378 74,000 26,622 27,486 86,000 58,514 175,715 279,551 103,837
Forest Lands Highways
Highway Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation
Program 6,711 6,711 33,998 33,998 40,011 40,011 73,276 73,276 153,995 153,995
Intelligent Transportation System Program 1,488 1,488 23 23 1,511 1,511
Miscellaneous Federal (AMTRAK, Department of
Defense, Emergency Repairs, etc.)
Public Lands Highways 651 651 434 434 1,085 1,085
Recreational Trails 364 364 1,931 1,931 2,294 2,295
Surface Transportation Program 25,354 27,721 2,367 18,848 20,116 1,268 20,584 22,552 1,968 175 24,850 24,675 64,960 95,239 30,278
Surface Transportation Program Enhancement 3,671 4,768 1,097 19,960 21,749 1,789 2,800 5,232 2,432 2,526 4,450 1,924 28,957 36,199 7,242
Surface Transportation Program Hazard Elimination &
Safety 475 475 1,231 1,231 1,706 1,706
Surface Transportation Program Railroad Grade
Crossing Protection 400 400 400 400
Transportation and Community and System
Preservation Pilot Program 469 469 469 469
State Funds
STIP - State Funds 3,182 3,182 31,464 31,464 144,764 144,764 70,503 70,503 249,913 249,913
SHOPP - State Funds 568 568 16,405 18,522 2,117 6,064 24,000 17,936 3,561 28,000 24,439 26,598 71,090 44,492
Miscellaneous (Proposition 116, Regional STP
Exchange, State Transit Assistance, etc.) 2,781 2,781 1,332 2,272 940 105 105 4,112 5,157 1,045
Traffic Congestion Relief Program 7,530 7,530 21,100 21,100 97,500 97,500 126,130 126,130
Local Funds
Developer Capital Investment 10,219 10,219 69,845 103,100 33,255 88,310 103,100 14,790 58,299 103,100 44,801 216,454 319,519 103,065
Developer Impact Fees 43,805 43,805 121,223 37,500 -83,723 90,354 37,500 -52,854 55,580 37,500 -18,080 267,156 156,305 -110,852
Farebox Revenue 26,709 26,709 587 39,600 39,013 608 39,400 38,792 41,600 41,600 1,194 147,309 146,114
Local Agency Funds 45,912 45,912 85,435 85,435 93,099 39,600 -53,499 80,204 39,600 -40,604 258,738 210,547 -48,191
Local Transportation Funds 49,086 100,000 50,914 50,054 50,054 48,238 83,400 35,162 46,890 85,600 38,710 145,182 319,054 173,872
Redevelopment Funds 535 535 7,454 7,454 610 610 8,064 8,599 535
Road Fund 4,998 4,998 709 80,100 79,391 100,100 100,100 746 98,300 97,554 1,455 283,498 282,043
Sacramento Measure A Sales Tax 49,743 80,000 30,257 48,590 103,600 55,010 23,883 106,300 82,417 28,605 109,100 80,495 101,078 399,000 297,922
Total Programmed
* Includes carry-over revenue
359,111 443,746 84,635 824,630 974,533 149,904 764,382 986,917 222,535 605,071 997,298 392,227 2,322,188 3,402,494 1,080,306
12
4/6/2006

SECTION 3:
2006/08 METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
ACTION ELEMENT
13

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
CAL18740 El Dorado County Lead Agency Caltrans District 3
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
CAL18740 2C360 06 AUG 2005
SR-49 Coloma Safety Improvements
In Coloma - South Fork American River Bridge #25-21
to Marshall Road Safety Improvements
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
CAL16161 El Dorado County Lead Agency Caltrans District 3
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
CAL16161 355510 06 2011
US 50/Placerville Dr Intersection Improvements
1) US 50, West Placerville Dr. to Bedford Ave:
construct EB turn and acceleration lane; 2) From
existing eastern terminus of Placerville Drive to the
existing western terminus of Main Street: construct
two-lane connection; 3) US 50 at Canal St, Rt 49
(Spring St), and Bedford Ave intersections: improve
traffic signals,; 4) On local streets: widen local
streets intersections for vehicle storage, ; 5) US 50
intersections: and lengthen existing US 50 left-turn
pockets for vehicle storage; 6) US 50 and Main
Street: close EB off-ramp; and 7) Construct various
context sensitive solutions and Transportation
Enhancement Activity (TEA) features.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
ELD19100 El Dorado County Lead Agency City of Placerville Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
Last Revised
Completion Year
ELD19100 n/a 06 2006
Point View Drive
EA Number
In the City of Placerville, Point View Drive from
Broadway to Smith Flat Road: extend two-lane road.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 Local Agency Funds
$200,000 $200,000
2006 Developer Capital Investment
$50,000 $550,000 $600,000
2007 Developer Capital Investment
$500,000 $500,000
$200,000
$50,000 $1,050,000 $1,300,000
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $1,300,000
SACOG ID
ELD16060 El Dorado County Lead Agency City of Placerville Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
ELD16060 n/a 06 2012
US 50 Western Placerville Interchanges
Reconstruct existing Forni Rd./Placerville Dr.
Interchange; convert Ray Lawyer Dr. overcrossing to
full interchange; add westbound and eastbound
auxiliary lanes between Ray Lawyer Dr. and
Placerville Dr. and minor access road changes
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
08
$1,700,000 $32,800,000 $34,500,000
$3,675,000 $1,700,000 $32,800,000 $38,175,000
Federal Project
Total Cost $38,175,000
SACOG ID
ELD15010 El Dorado County Lead Agency El Dorado County Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
ELD15010 n/a 06 2007
Cameron Park Drive Operational Improvements
In El Dorado County, Cameron Park Drive, Palmer
Drive to Green Valley Road: conduct operational and
safety analysis to identify and prioritize needed
improvements.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
ELD19173 El Dorado County Lead Agency El Dorado County Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
ELD19173 n/a 06 2010
El Dorado Hills Blvd. - US 50 Bicycle and Pedestrian
Overcrossing
US 50, east of El Dorado Hills Blvd Interchange from
Raley's to El Dorado Hills Town Center: Construct
Bicycle and Pedestrian overcrossing
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2007 Local Agency Funds
$30,318 $30,318
2007 Regional Surface Transportation Program
$234,000 $234,000
2008 Local Agency Funds
$1,310,000 $1,310,000
2008 Regional Surface Transportation Program
$175,000 $175,000
>08
$1,069,682 $1,069,682
$264,318
$0 $2,554,682 $2,819,000
Federal Project
Total Cost $2,819,000
Exempt
Category:
Bicycle and pedestrian facilities
SACOG ID
ELD19168 El Dorado County Lead Agency El Dorado County Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
ELD19168 n/a 06 2008
El Dorado Hills Blvd/Francisco Drive Intersection
Modifications
Realignment/reconfiguration and signalization of the
El Dorado Hills Blvd/Francisco Dr/Brittany Wy
intersection. Intersection location to be moved
approximately 175' westerly; Francisco Dr N/NW of
existing intersection will become El Dorado Hills Blvd;
El Dorado Hills Blvd N/NE of existing intersection will
become Salmon Falls Rd. Requires construction of
new approaches to new intersection location.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$1,279,000 $354,000 $1,633,000
2007 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$3,400,000 $3,400,000
$1,279,000
$354,000 $3,400,000 $5,033,000
Other
Total Cost $5,033,000
Exempt
Category:
Intersection signalization projects at individual intersections
17
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
ELD19170 El Dorado County Lead Agency El Dorado County Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
ELD19170 n/a 06 2010
North Shingle Road Realignment at Ponderosa Road
Realignment/reconfiguration of intersection to address
traffic operations. North Shingle Road to be realigned,
with intersection to be moved from its current location
to approximately 600 feet northerly on Ponderosa
Road. New intersection will be signalized. Realigned
North Shingle Road will be two through lanes with
turn pockets at intersection.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$200,000 $200,000
2006 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$1,000,000 $2,200,000 $3,200,000
2007 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$2,700,000 $2,700,000
$1,200,000 $2,200,000 $2,700,000 $6,100,000
Other
Total Cost $6,100,000
Exempt
Category:
Intersection signalization projects at individual intersections
SACOG ID
ELD19186 El Dorado County Lead Agency El Dorado County Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
ELD19186 n/a 06 2009
Northside School Bike Path and Lanes
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 Regional Transportation Enhancement Activities $100,000 $100,000
2008 Regional Transportation Enhancement Activities $175,000 $175,000
$275,000
$0
$0
$275,000
Project Description
El Dorado County, Cool Township along portions of
both SR49 and SR193:
A. Class I Bike path along the west side of SR49
from the Northside School to the intersection of SR49
and SR193 for an approximate length of .75 miles.
B. Class II Bike lanes on SR 193 from SR49 to the
community of Auburn Lake Trails for an approximate
length of 2 miles.
Both paths are anticipated to lie entirely within
County, Caltrans and/or Bureau of Reclamation
rights-of-way.
Federal Project
Total Cost $275,000
Exempt
Category:
Bicycle and pedestrian facilities
18
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
ELD15990 El Dorado County Lead Agency El Dorado County Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
ELD15990 n/a 06 2009
Pleasant Valley / Missouri Flat Connector
Construct a new 2 lane divided roadway from Missouri
Flat, north of China Garden, to Pleasant Valley Road
/ Route 49 at Fowler Lane. Involves realignment of
Missouri Flat and Route 49 north of Pleasant Valley
Road.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
ELD15690 El Dorado County Lead Agency El Dorado County Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
ELD15690 370000 06 2008
US 50 Missouri Flat Road Interchange
Reconstruct Missouri Flat interchange at U.S. 50.
Project phasing includes: Phase 1A - Reconstruct
existing interchange, widen Missouri Flat Road from
Prospector Plaza to Mother Lode Dr, intersection
improvements and signalization at Mother Lode Dr.
Phase 1B - construct auxilliary lanes on US 50 from
Missour Flat Rd to Forni Rd, realign Perks Ct, and
ramp improvements.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
ELD19172 El Dorado County Lead Agency El Dorado County Parks and Recreation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
ELD19172 n/a 06 2007
Class I Bike Path: Sacramento - Placerville
Transportation Corridor (SPTC)
Construct a Class I Bike path along the
Sacramento-Placerville Transportation Corridor from
Forni Road to Missouri Flat Road.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 Local Agency Funds
$6,750 $6,750
2006 State Transportation Enhancement Activities
$38,250 $38,250
2007 Local Agency Funds
$18,075 $18,075
2007 State Transportation Enhancement Activities $102,425 $102,425
2008 Local Agency Funds
$158,625 $158,625
2008 State Transportation Enhancement Activities
$898,875 $898,875
$165,500
$0 $1,057,500 $1,223,000
Federal Project
Total Cost $1,223,000
Exempt
Category:
Bicycle and pedestrian facilities
SACOG ID
ELD19161 El Dorado County Lead Agency El Dorado County Transit
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
ELD19161 n/a 06 SEP 2007
Bus Acquisition and Preventive Maintenance
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 FTA 5307
$444,000 $444,000
2006 Transportation Development Act
$88,800 $88,800
$0
$0
$532,800
$532,800
Project Description
Bus Acquisition and Preventive maintenance FTA
5307
Federal Project
Total Cost $532,800
Exempt
Category:
Operating assistance to transit agencies
SACOG ID
ELD19164 El Dorado County Lead Agency El Dorado County Transit
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
ELD19164 n/a 06 SEP 2007
Bus Acquisition and Preventive Maintenance
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2007 FTA 5307
$444,000 $444,000
2007 Transportation Development Act
$88,800 $88,800
$0
$0
$532,800
$532,800
Project Description
Bus acquisition and Preventive maintenance
Federal Project
Total Cost $532,800
Exempt
Category:
Operating assistance to transit agencies
21
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
ELD19155 El Dorado County Lead Agency El Dorado County Transit
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
ELD19155 n/a 06 2007
Operating Assistance - FTA 5311 (Grant Cycle 23)
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2007 FTA 5311
$188,285 $188,285
$0
$0
$188,285
$188,285
Project Description
Operating assistance grant - FTA 5311 (rural
program)
Federal Project
Total Cost $188,285
Exempt
Category:
Operating assistance to transit agencies
SACOG ID
ELD19174 El Dorado County Lead Agency El Dorado County Transit
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
ELD19174 n/a 06 2007
Operating and Capital
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 FTA 5311
$594,900 $594,900
$0
$0
$594,900
$594,900
Project Description
Operating Assistance and Capital FTA 5311 Cycle
24(Rural Program)
Federal Project
Total Cost $594,900
Exempt
Category:
Operating assistance to transit agencies
SACOG ID
ELD19160 El Dorado County Lead Agency El Dorado County Transit
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
ELD19160 n/a 06 DEC 2007
Preventive maintenance.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 FTA 5307
$80,000 $80,000
2006 Transportation Development Act
$20,000 $20,000
$0
$0
$100,000
$100,000
Project Description
Preventive Maintenance
Federal Project
Total Cost $100,000
Exempt
Category:
Operating assistance to transit agencies
22
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
ELD19157 El Dorado County Lead Agency El Dorado County Transit
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
ELD19157 n/a 06 JUN 2007
Transit Vehicle Replacement
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 FTA 5310
$353,600 $353,600
2006 Transportation Development Act
$88,400 $88,400
$0
$0
$442,000
$442,000
Project Description
Replacement of six (6) transit buses and purchase of
two (2) mini-vans for minor service expansion.
Federal Project
Total Cost $442,000
Exempt
Category:
Purchase of new buses and rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for minor expansions of the fleet
SACOG ID
ELD10130 El Dorado County Lead Agency El Dorado County Transportation Commission
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
ELD10130 n/a 06 2006
EDCTC Non-Motorized Projects
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 Regional Surface Transportation Program Exchange
$97,457 $97,457
$0
$0
$97,457
$97,457
Project Description
El Dorado County, non-motorized set aside for
various projects.
In lieu of TDA Article 3 funds FY 00/01 - 02/03.
Federal Project
Total Cost $97,457
Exempt
Category:
Bicycle and pedestrian facilities
SACOG ID
ELD19124 El Dorado County Lead Agency El Dorado County Transportation Commission
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
ELD19124 n/a 06 2006
EDCTC Project Implementation and Oversight
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 Regional Surface Transportation Program Exchange
$69,627 $69,627
$0
$0
$69,627
$69,627
Project Description
Project Implementation and Oversight
Federal Project
Total Cost $69,627
Exempt
Category:
Specific activities which do not involve or lead directly to construction, such as: planning and technical studies, grants for training
and research programs, planning activities conducted pursuant to titles 23 and 49 U.S.c., and Federal-aid systems revisions
23
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
CAL18731 Placer County Lead Agency Caltrans District 3
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
CAL18731 4A700 06 NOV 2010
I-80 Blue Canyon Road Rehabilitation
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2008 National Highway System Fund
$5,922,657 $15,935,400 $21,858,057
2008 State Cash
$767,343 $2,064,600 $2,831,943
$6,690,000
$0 $18,000,000 $24,690,000
Project Description
Near Blue Canyon - Nyack to Carpenter Flat -
Rehabilitate roadway
Federal Project
Total Cost $24,690,000
Exempt
Category:
Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation
SACOG ID
CAL18733 Placer County Lead Agency Caltrans District 3
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
CAL18733 0C690 06 NOV 2009
I-80 Gold Run Safety Roadside Rest Area
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2007 National Highway System Fund
$1,604,163 $4,498,209 $6,102,372
2007 State Cash
$207,837 $582,791 $790,628
$1,812,000
$0 $5,081,000 $6,893,000
Project Description
Near Gold Run - Rehabilitate Gold Run Safety
Roadside Rest Area
Federal Project
Total Cost $6,893,000
Exempt
Category:
Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation
SACOG ID
CAL18200 Placer County Lead Agency Caltrans District 3
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
CAL18200 36781 06 AUG 2008
I-80 Operational Improvements-HOV Bypass (Phase
1)
In Placer County, near Sacramento - west of
Sac/Placer County line to Douglas Blvd., Construct
eastbound auxiliary lane from the Riverside Avenue
onramp to the Douglas Blvd northbound offramp; and
add an HOV Bypass Lane on the Auburn Blvd /
Riverside Avenue onramp.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
CAL18767 Placer County Lead Agency Caltrans District 3
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
CAL18767 36782 06 2011
I-80 Operational Improvements-HOV Lanes (Phase 2)
In Placer County, near Sacramento, west of
Sac/Placer County line to east of the Route 65
Connector - Construct eastbound and westbound
HOV lanes, and Auxiliary lanes with bridge widening
and ramp modifications.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
08
$9,500,000 $168,000,000 $177,500,000
$16,900,000 $4,900,000 $168,700,000 $190,500,000
Federal Project
Total Cost $190,500,000
SACOG ID
CAL17240 Placer County Lead Agency Caltrans District 3
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
CAL17240 333800 06 2014
Route 65 Lincoln Bypass
Near Lincoln, Route 65, Industrial Boulevard to south
of Yuba County line, construct a new 4-lane
expressway/freeway on a new alignment.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
08
$154,910,000 $154,910,000
$16,942,000 $28,537,935 $154,910,000 $200,389,935
Federal Project
Total Cost $200,389,935
25
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
CAL16470 Placer County Lead Agency Caltrans District 3
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
CAL16470 0A410 06 FEB 2008
SR49/Dry Creek Operational Improvements
In Auburn, SR 49, Chana Dr to Quartz Dr: improve
operations and safety, including channelization,
intersection improvements, drainage improvements
and shoulder widening. (EA 0A410)
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
08
$7,040,000 $7,040,000
$2,920,000 $1,765,000 $7,040,000 $11,725,000
Federal Project
Total Cost $11,725,000
Exempt
Category:
Intersection signalization projects at individual intersections
SACOG ID
CAL18754 Placer County Lead Agency Caltrans District 3
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
CAL18754 0E060 06 NOV 2006
Satellite Operations Center/TOS
In Placer County near Kingvale, 0.2 Miles West of
Kingvale Undercrossing, Upgrade Kingvale Satellite
Operations Center, and add TOS Elements at various
locations in Placer and Nevada Counties on I-80, SR
267, SR 89 and SR 28. (EA 0E060)
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 Federal Demonstration Funds
$2,000,000 $2,000,000
2006 National Highway System Fund
$1,062,360 $1,062,360
2006 State Cash
$137,640 $137,640
$0
$0 $3,200,000 $3,200,000
Federal Project
Total Cost $3,200,000
Exempt
Category:
Traffic control devices and operating assistance other than signalization projects
26
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
CAL18752 Placer County Lead Agency Caltrans District 3
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
CAL18752 0E820 06 FEB 2007
State Route 49 Tree Planting
In Placer County, on State Route 49 in the City of
Auburn, from Lincoln Way to Fulweiler Street:
Landscaping.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 State Cash
$3,900 $3,900
2005 State Transportation Enhancement Activities
$26,100 $26,100
2006 State Cash
$1,037 $17,362 $18,399
2006 State Transportation Enhancement Activities
$6,963 $116,638 $123,601
$30,000
$8,000
$134,000
$172,000
Federal Project
Total Cost $172,000
Exempt
Category:
Plantings, landscaping, etc.
SACOG ID
PLA20200 Placer County Lead Agency City of Auburn Dept. of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
PLA20200 n/a 06 2007
Auburn Transit Operations
Operate Auburn Transit
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 Farebox Revenue
$30,000 $30,000
2006 Transportation Development Act
$380,000 $380,000
2007 Farebox Revenue
$30,900 $30,900
2007 Transportation Development Act
$391,400 $391,400
$0
$0
$832,300
$832,300
Other
Total Cost $832,300
Exempt
Category:
Operating assistance to transit agencies
SACOG ID
PLA25181 Placer County Lead Agency City of Auburn Dept. of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
PLA25181 n/a 06 JUL 2007
Maidu Drive Pedestrian/Bikeway Facilities
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality
$459,976 $459,976
2006 Local Agency Funds
$100,097 $100,097
$0
$0
$560,073
$560,073
Project Description
Class 2 bike lane and sidewalk along Maidu Drive to
allow for a continuous bike lane and sidewalk to the
Skyridge neighborhood and to the Skyridge School.
Federal Project
Total Cost $560,073
Exempt
Category:
Bicycle and pedestrian facilities
27
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
PLA25158 Placer County Lead Agency City of Colfax Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
PLA25158 n/a 06 2006
Downtown Colfax Bike Lane Extension
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 State Cash
$90,000 $90,000
$0
$0
$90,000
$90,000
Project Description
From Downtown Multi-modal station, construct bike
path extension to the intersection of Main Street and
SR 174.
Other
Total Cost $90,000
Exempt
Category:
Bicycle and pedestrian facilities
SACOG ID
PLA25024 Placer County Lead Agency City of Colfax Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
PLA25024 n/a 06 AUG 2006
South Auburn Street Pedestrian and Bike Project
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality
$100,000 $100,000
2006 Local Agency Funds
$5,000 $7,956 $12,956
$5,000
$0
$107,956
$112,956
Project Description
Add bike lanes on both sides of street.
Federal Project
Total Cost $112,956
Exempt
Category:
Bicycle and pedestrian facilities
SACOG ID
PLA25022 Placer County Lead Agency City of Lincoln Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
PLA25022 n/a 06 NOV 2008
Auburn Ravine Bridge
Preliminary Engineering, Environmental
Documentation, Permitting, and Construction of
Neighborhood Electric Vehicle (NEV) and pedestrian
bridge crossing Auburn Ravine. Preliminary
Engineering, Environmental Documentation, and
Permitting for future vehicle bridge at same location.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
PLA25165 Placer County Lead Agency City of Lincoln Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
PLA25165 n/a 06 JUL 2006
E. Lincoln Parkway
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$769,000 $3,800,000 $4,569,000
$769,000
$0 $3,800,000 $4,569,000
Project Description
Widen from 2 to 4 lanes from Ferrari Ranch Road to
Sterling Parkway, including SR 65/UPRR
overcrossing.
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $4,569,000
SACOG ID
PLA19070 Placer County Lead Agency City of Lincoln Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
PLA19070 n/a 06 2011
Ferrari Ranch Road at SR 65 Bypass
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2008 Local Agency Funds
$12,000,000 $12,000,000
$0
$0 $12,000,000 $12,000,000
Project Description
In Lincoln, SR 65 Lincoln Bypass at Ferrari Ranch
Road: construct interchange
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $12,000,000
SACOG ID
PLA20780 Placer County Lead Agency City of Lincoln Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Last Revised
Completion Year
PLA20780 n/a 06 2020
Gladding Parkway
EA Number
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$270,000 $270,000
>08
$500,000 $3,630,000 $4,130,000
$270,000
$500,000 $3,630,000 $4,400,000
Project Description
Construct a new 2 lane roadway from Nicolaus Rd.
near K Street to East Avenue near 9th Street
including overpass over UPRR and SR 65 and
connection to 12th Street
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $4,400,000
29
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
PLA18770 Placer County Lead Agency City of Lincoln Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Last Revised
Completion Year
PLA18770 n/a 06 2010
Lincoln Pkwy.
EA Number
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$175,000 $175,000
$0
$0
$175,000
$175,000
Project Description
Widen from 2 to 4 lanes road from Sterling Pkwy to
Del Webb Blvd
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $175,000
SACOG ID
PLA20230 Placer County Lead Agency City of Lincoln Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
PLA20230 n/a 06 2005
Lincoln Transit Operating Assistance
Operating funds for Lincoln Transit
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
PLA25032 Placer County Lead Agency City of Lincoln Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
PLA25032 n/a 06 NOV 2006
State Route 65 Signal Coordination Project
Analysis, design, and construction of traffic signal
modifications, signage, and striping improvements
along State Route 65 from Ferrari Ranch Road to 7th
Street to relieve traffic congestion within downtown
Lincoln.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
PLA19100 Placer County Lead Agency City of Loomis Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
PLA19100 n/a 06 AUG 2007
Loomis Rail Station Enhancements
Design and construct pedestrian and landscaping
improvements at the multimodal center including a
Class I bike facility adjacent to Taylor Rd. from
downtown Loomis to Sierra College Blvd.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
PLA20890 Placer County Lead Agency City of Loomis Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
PLA20890 n/a 06 2010
Sierra College Boulevard Widening
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2007 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$5,899,180 $5,899,180
$0
$0 $5,899,180 $5,899,180
Project Description
In Loomis, from railroad tracks (Taylor Road) to the
north town limits, widen from 2 to 4 lanes.
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $5,899,180
SACOG ID
PLA20900 Placer County Lead Agency City of Loomis Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
PLA20900 n/a 06 2008
Taylor Road Improvements
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$1,600,000 $1,600,000
$0
$0 $1,600,000 $1,600,000
Project Description
In Loomis, Taylor Road from south town limits to King
Road: add signals at three intersections, 2500 feet of
two-way left turn lanes, bike lanes, sidewalk, curb,
gutter and underground drainage system. See note
below.
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $1,600,000
33
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
PLA19490 Placer County Lead Agency City of Rocklin Division of Engineering
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
PLA19490 349901 06 2008
I-80 / Sierra College Boulevard Interchange
Interchange reconstruction, including replacement of
overcrossing structure, widening of existing Sierra
College Boulevard from 2 to 5 lanes, and
reconstruction of all interchange on- and off-ramps
and loops.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
PLA20460 Placer County Lead Agency City of Rocklin Division of Engineering
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
PLA20460 n/a 06 2007
Sierra College Boulevard
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2007 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$950,000 $950,000
$0
$0
$950,000
$950,000
Project Description
In Rocklin, Sierra College Boulevard from Aguilar
Tributary to Nightwatch: widen from 2 to 4 lanes.
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $950,000
SACOG ID
PLA20470 Placer County Lead Agency City of Rocklin Division of Engineering
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
PLA20470 n/a 06 2007
Sierra College Boulevard
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2007 Local Agency Funds
$3,850,000 $3,850,000
$0
$0 $3,850,000 $3,850,000
Project Description
Widen Sierra College Blvd. from 2 to 4 lanes from I-80
interchange to Aguilar Tributary.
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $3,850,000
SACOG ID
PLA25119 Placer County Lead Agency City of Rocklin Division of Engineering
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
PLA25119 n/a 06 2007
Sierra College Boulevard
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2007 Local Agency Funds
$1,950,000 $1,950,000
$0
$0 $1,950,000 $1,950,000
Project Description
Widen to 6 lanes from Granite Drive to RR tracks.
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $1,950,000
35
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
PLA19250 Placer County Lead Agency City of Rocklin Division of Engineering
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
PLA19250 n/a 06 2008
Valley View Parkway
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2008 Developer Capital Investment
$9,598,940 $9,598,940
2008 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$401,060 $401,060
$0
$0 $10,000,000 $10,000,000
Project Description
Construct 2 lanes from Park Drive to Sierra College
Blvd.
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $10,000,000
SACOG ID
PLA19290 Placer County Lead Agency City of Rocklin Division of Engineering
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
PLA19290 n/a 06 2010
Whitney Ranch Parkway
In Rocklin, construct new 4-lane facility from east of
Liberty Parkway to Park Drive. Project will be
constructed in two phases: Phase 1 was completed
in 2005; Phase 2 to be completed in 2010.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 Developer Capital Investment
$1,209,624 $1,209,624
2008 Developer Capital Investment
$1,612,831 $1,612,831
>08
$6,172,545 $6,172,545
$1,209,624 $1,612,831 $6,172,545 $8,995,000
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $8,995,000
SACOG ID
PLA19810 Placer County Lead Agency City of Roseville Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
PLA19810 n/a 06 2008
Atkinson Street/PFE Road Widening
In Roseville, Atkinson Street/PFE Road: widen from
two to four lanes from Foothills Blvd to city limits.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$800,000 $200,000 $1,000,000
2007 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$500,000 $4,000,000 $4,500,000
2008 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$2,500,000 $2,500,000
$800,000
$700,000 $6,500,000 $8,000,000
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $8,000,000
36
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
PLA15680 Placer County Lead Agency City of Roseville Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
PLA15680 n/a 06 NOV 2008
Cirby Way Widening
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2008 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$500,000 $500,000 $4,000,000 $5,000,000
$500,000
$500,000 $4,000,000 $5,000,000
Project Description
Intersection improvements along Cirby Way between
Foothills Boulevard and Riverside Avenue, including a
southbound bypass lane from Foothills to Roseville
Road, Eastbound dual right lanes at Riverside
Avenue, two lanes onto W/B I-80.
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $5,000,000
SACOG ID
PLA20870 Placer County Lead Agency City of Roseville Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
PLA20870 n/a 06 2006
Downtown Roseville Revitalization
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 Local Agency Funds
$67,179 $50,000 $117,179
2006 Transportation & Community System Preservation $346,457 $122,260 $468,717
$413,636
$0
$172,260
$585,896
Project Description
In Roseville, downtown historical district: Pedestrian
enhancements to the Washington Blvd. underpass
and Harding to Royer bike trail construction.
Federal Project
Total Cost $585,896
Exempt
Category:
Transportation enhancement activities (except rehabilitation and operation of historic transportation buildings, structures or facilities)
37
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
PLA25027 Placer County Lead Agency City of Roseville Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
PLA25027 n/a 06 SEP 2006
Historic District Revitalization Project
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 Local Agency Funds
$4,969,370 $4,969,370
2006 Regional Surface Transportation Program
$630,630 $630,630
$0
$0 $5,600,000 $5,600,000
Project Description
In Roseville Historic District on Main, Church, Lincoln
and Pacific Streets; Add streetscape improvements
including landscaping, lighting, street furniture and
specialty pavement; infrastructure improvements
including water, sewer, storm drain, curb, gutter,
sidewalk and pavement rehabilitation.
Federal Project
Total Cost $5,600,000
Exempt
Category:
Transportation enhancement activities (except rehabilitation and operation of historic transportation buildings, structures or facilities)
SACOG ID
PLA15710 Placer County Lead Agency City of Roseville Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
PLA15710 n/a 06 SEP 2008
I-80 Eureka Road On-Ramp Improvements
In Roseville, Eureka Road at I-80: add 4th WB thru
lane from 500' E of N. Sunrise to EB I-80 on-ramp and
change existing #1 NB and SB thru lanes at
Sunrise/Eureka to left turn lanes.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$339,000 $300,000 $1,000,000 $1,639,000
2008 Federal Demonstration Funds
$1,500,000 $1,500,000
2008 State Cash
$361,000 $361,000
$339,000
$300,000 $2,861,000 $3,500,000
Federal Project
Total Cost $3,500,000
38
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
PLA25179 Placer County Lead Agency City of Roseville Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
PLA25179 n/a 06 OCT 2006
ITS Equipment Conversion
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2007 Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality
$700,000 $700,000
2007 Local Agency Funds
$84,000 $84,000
$0
$0
$784,000
$784,000
Project Description
In Roseville, 1) along Douglas Blvd. from I-80 to
Eureka Rd. 2) Eureka Rd. from Wills Rd. to Douglas
Blvd. 3) Galleria Blvd. from Roseville Pkwy to
Highland Park Dr. 4) Roseville Pkwy from Chase Dr.
to Secret Ravine Pkwy: upgrade traffic signal
controllers, cabinets, communication modems and
add CCTV cameras to makimize efficient movement
of vehicles and provide real time traveler information.
Federal Project
Total Cost $784,000
Exempt
Category:
Traffic control devices and operating assistance other than signalization projects
SACOG ID
PLA25028 Placer County Lead Agency City of Roseville Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
PLA25028 n/a 06 JUN 2006
Riverside Avenue Revitalization Project
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 Local Agency Funds
$8,752,500 $8,752,500
2006 Regional Surface Transportation Program
$247,500 $247,500
$0
$0 $9,000,000 $9,000,000
Project Description
Riverside Ave. from Douglas Blvd. to Darling Way;
develop project area specific plan, add streetscape
improvements including landscape, lighting, signage,
street furniture, and specialty pavement; and
rehabilitate water, sewer, curb, gutter, sidewalk and
pavement.
Federal Project
Total Cost $9,000,000
Exempt
Category:
Transportation enhancement activities (except rehabilitation and operation of historic transportation buildings, structures or facilities)
39
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
PLA25189 Placer County Lead Agency City of Roseville Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
PLA25189 n/a 06 OCT 2006
Roseville Fiber Optic (Part of STARNET)
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 Intelligent Transportation System Funds
$192,241 $192,241
$0
$0
$192,241
$192,241
Project Description
In Roseville, add STARNET fiber optic cable in
conduit to enhance inter-jurisdictional traffic signal
coordination and STARNET communications.
Federal Project
Total Cost $192,241
Exempt
Category:
Construction or renovation of power, signal, and communications systems
SACOG ID
PLA19841 Placer County Lead Agency City of Roseville Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
PLA19841 n/a 06 2007
Roseville Maintenance Facility Upgrades
Upgrade existing Vehicle Maintenance facility, at City
of Roseville Corporation Yard (2005 Hilltop Circle).
Upgrade to allow for work on CNG buses.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 Transportation Development Act
$262,000 $1,500,000 $1,762,000
2006 Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality
$80,000 $80,000
2006 Local Agency Funds
$10,000 $10,000
$262,000
$0 $1,590,000 $1,852,000
Federal Project
Total Cost $1,852,000
Exempt
Category:
Reconstruction or renovation of transit buildings and structures (e.g., rail or bus buildings, storage and maintenance facilities,
stations, terminals, and ancillary structures)
SACOG ID
PLA20291 Placer County Lead Agency City of Roseville Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
PLA20291 n/a 06 DEC 2007
Roseville Multitransit Center
In Central Roseville, construct parking facilities for
multi-modal transit center (ENVIRONMENTAL & P.E.
ONLY).
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
PLA16080 Placer County Lead Agency City of Roseville Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
PLA16080 n/a 06 2006
Roseville Park and Ride Facilities
In Roseville, design and construct park and ride
facilities.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 Local Agency Funds
$325,000 $325,000
2006 Local Agency Funds
$1,100,000 $1,100,000
2007 Local Agency Funds
$1,125,000 $1,125,000
$325,000 $1,100,000 $1,125,000 $2,550,000
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $2,550,000
SACOG ID
PLA15850 Placer County Lead Agency City of Roseville Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Last Revised
Completion Year
PLA15850 n/a 06 NOV 2008
Roseville Road
EA Number
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2007 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$500,000 $500,000 $4,000,000 $5,000,000
$500,000
$500,000 $4,000,000 $5,000,000
Project Description
Widen from 2 to 4 lanes from City Limits to Cirby
Way.
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $5,000,000
SACOG ID
PLA25029 Placer County Lead Agency City of Roseville Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
PLA25029 n/a 06 2006
Roseville Roadway Resurfacing
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 Local Agency Funds
$3,000 $180,000 $183,000
2006 Regional Surface Transportation Program
$1,417,000 $1,417,000
$3,000
$0 $1,597,000 $1,600,000
Project Description
Asphalt resurfacing of various roadways in Roseville.
Federal Project
Total Cost $1,600,000
Exempt
Category:
Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation
41
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
PCT10190 Placer County Lead Agency City of Roseville Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
PCT10190 n/a 06 2007
Roseville Transit Operating Assistance
Operating Assistance for Roseville Transit
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 FTA 3037
$261,957 $261,957
2005 Farebox Revenue
$489,000 $489,000
2005 Local Transportation Fund
$4,565,614 $4,565,614
2006 FTA 3037
$142,175 $142,175
2006 Farebox Revenue
$508,560 $508,560
2006 Local Transportation Fund
$4,725,410 $4,725,410
2007 FTA 3037
$142,175 $142,175
2007 Farebox Revenue
$528,902 $528,902
2007 Local Transportation Fund
$4,890,790 $4,890,790
$0
$0 $16,254,583 $16,254,583
Federal Project
Total Cost $16,254,583
Exempt
Category:
Operating assistance to transit agencies
SACOG ID
PLA25120 Placer County Lead Agency City of Roseville Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
PLA25120 n/a 06 2007
Roseville Transit Rolling Stock
In Roseville, purchase Dial-a-Ride buses for Roseville
Transit.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 FTA 5307
$130,000 $130,000
2005 Local Agency Funds
$108,000 $108,000
2006 FTA 5307
$384,000 $384,000
2006 Local Agency Funds
$96,000 $96,000
2007 FTA 5307
$536,000 $536,000
2007 Local Agency Funds
$134,000 $134,000
$0
$0 $1,388,000 $1,388,000
Federal Project
Total Cost $1,388,000
Exempt
Category:
Purchase of new buses and rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for minor expansions of the fleet
42
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
PLA25190 Placer County Lead Agency City of Roseville Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
PLA25190 n/a 06 2007
Roseville to Rocklin Fiber Optic for STARNET
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 Intelligent Transportation System Funds
$33,500 $33,500
$0
$0
$33,500
$33,500
Project Description
In Roseville, add STARNET fiber optic cable in
conduit to enhance inter-jurisdictional traffic signal
coordination and STARNET communications.
Federal Project
Total Cost $33,500
Exempt
Category:
Construction or renovation of power, signal, and communications systems
SACOG ID
PLA20620 Placer County Lead Agency Placer County Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
PLA20620 n/a 06 DEC 2006
Athens Connector Road
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
PLA15100 Placer County Lead Agency Placer County Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
Last Revised
Completion Year
PLA15100 n/a 06 2009
Baseline Road
EA Number
In Placer County, Baseline Road from Fiddyment
Road to Watt Avenue: widen from 2 to 4 lanes.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$250,000 $250,000
2006 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$575,000 $575,000
2007 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$3,675,000 $3,675,000
$250,000
$575,000 $3,675,000 $4,500,000
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $4,500,000
SACOG ID
PLA25186 Placer County Lead Agency Placer County Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
PLA25186 n/a 06 2008
Douglas Blvd. Pedestrian Facilities and Landscaping
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality
$40,000 $3,000 $207,000 $250,000
2006 Local Matching Funds
$30,000 $30,000
$40,000
$3,000
$237,000
$280,000
Project Description
Installation of approximately 1,400 lineal feet of
sidewalk and 42,000 SF of landscaping along north
side of Douglas Blvd. between Sierra College Blvd.
and Auburn-Folsom Road. There are several
"missing" links of walkway that need to be
constructed. This project will facilitate safe
pedestrian travel in this area.
Federal Project
Total Cost $280,000
Exempt
Category:
Bicycle and pedestrian facilities
SACOG ID
PLA15070 Placer County Lead Agency Placer County Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
Last Revised
Completion Year
PLA15070 n/a 06 2010
I-80
EA Number
Auburn Ravine Rd. at I-80: widen overcrossing from 2
to 4 lanes.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2007 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$750,000 $750,000
2008 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$1,000,000 $1,000,000
>08
$3,250,000 $3,250,000
$750,000 $1,000,000 $3,250,000 $5,000,000
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $5,000,000
44
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
PLA25184 Placer County Lead Agency Placer County Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
PLA25184 n/a 06 2007
JARC Operating Assistance
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 FTA 3037
$58,267 $58,267
2006 Transportation Development Act
$58,267 $58,267
$0
$0
$116,534
$116,534
Project Description
JARC Operating Assitance 2006
Federal Project
Total Cost $116,534
SACOG ID
PLA20350 Placer County Lead Agency Placer County Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
PLA20350 452834 06 2007
Local Roads in Auburn
In and near Auburn - adjacent to Route 49 between
I-80 and Dry Creek Road - three new local connector
roads; 1)Quartz Drive Connector from Route 49 to
Locksley Lane, 2) Willow Creek Drive Connector from
Route 49 to 1st Street in Dewitt Center, and
3)Edgewood Road Conector from Route 49 to Alta
Mesa Drive (City of Auburn) - state and local funding
only.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
08
$1,266,060 $1,266,060
$100,000
$41,940 $1,266,060 $1,408,000
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $1,408,000
45
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
PLA19510 Placer County Lead Agency Placer County Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
PLA19510 n/a 06 OCT 2009
SR 65 Sunset Blvd. Interchange
East of Rocklin, Intersecton of State Route 65 and
Sunset Boulevard: Construct interchange(Phase 1
Construction)
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
PLA25006 Placer County Lead Agency Placer County Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
PLA25006 n/a 06 NOV 2007
TART CNG Facility Phase 2
TART Maintenance Facility, 870 Cabin Creek Road,
Truckee, CA. Construct improvements to the TART
CNG Fueling Facility (phase 2).
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
PCT10478 Placer County Lead Agency Placer County Transit
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
PCT10478 n/a 06 2008
Install New Bus Wash System
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 Local Transportation Fund
$95,500 $95,500
$0
$0
$95,500
$95,500
Project Description
PCT Bus Maintenance Facility at 11432 F Ave.,
Auburn: Install a new Bus Wash System at the PCT
Bus Maintenance Facility
Other
Total Cost $95,500
Exempt
Category:
Purchase of office, shop, and operating equipment for existing facilities
SACOG ID
PCT10473 Placer County Lead Agency Placer County Transit
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
PCT10473 n/a 06 2006
Placer County - Transit Operating Assistance FY
05/06
Operation of transit services in non-urbanized areas of
Placer County
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 FTA 5311
$158,266 $158,266
2006 Transportation Development Act
$335,000 $335,000
$0
$0
$493,266
$493,266
Federal Project
Total Cost $493,266
Exempt
Category:
Operating assistance to transit agencies
SACOG ID
PCT10474 Placer County Lead Agency Placer County Transit
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
PCT10474 n/a 06 2007
Placer County -Transit Operating Assistance FY
06/07
Operation of transit services in non-urbanized areas of
Placer County
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2007 FTA 5311
$175,000 $175,000
2007 Transportation Development Act
$350,000 $350,000
$0
$0
$525,000
$525,000
Federal Project
Total Cost $525,000
Exempt
Category:
Operating assistance to transit agencies
48
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
PCT10469 Placer County Lead Agency Placer County Transit
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
PCT10469 n/a 06 2007
Placer County Transit Preventive Maintenance & ADA
Service
Placer County: Perform preventive maintenance on
the Placer County Transit fleet ($250,000 FTA)&
provide ADA transit service ($185,000 FTA).
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 FTA 5307
$435,000 $435,000
2006 Local Agency Funds
$281,625 $281,625
$0
$0
$716,625
$716,625
Federal Project
Total Cost $716,625
Exempt
Category:
Operating assistance to transit agencies
SACOG ID
PCT10470 Placer County Lead Agency Placer County Transit
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
PCT10470 n/a 06 2008
Placer County Transit Preventive Maintenance & ADA
Service
Placer County Transit: Perform preventive
maintenance on the Placer County Transit fleet
($255,000 FTA) & provide ADA transit service
($190,000 FTA).
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2007 FTA 5307
$445,000 $445,000
2007 Local Agency Funds
$307,500 $307,500
$0
$0
$752,500
$752,500
Federal Project
Total Cost $752,500
Exempt
Category:
Operating assistance to transit agencies
SACOG ID
PCT10481 Placer County Lead Agency Placer County Transit
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
PCT10481 n/a 06 2010
Purchase of Three CNG Commuter Buses
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2007 Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality
$990,000 $990,000
2007 Local Agency Funds
$151,200 $151,200
$0
$0 $1,141,200 $1,141,200
Project Description
Purchase of three (3) CNG commuter buses for
in-house operation commuter service.
Federal Project
Total Cost $1,141,200
Exempt
Category:
Purchase of new buses and rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for minor expansions of the fleet
49
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
PCT10479 Placer County Lead Agency Placer County Transit
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
PCT10479 n/a 06 2008
Sierra College Bus Stop Improvments
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 Local Transportation Fund
$40,000 $40,000
$0
$0
$40,000
$40,000
Project Description
Entrance bus stop on the preiphery of Sierra College
campus along Rocklin Road
Other
Total Cost $40,000
Exempt
Category:
Bus terminals and transfer points
SACOG ID
PCT10475 Placer County Lead Agency Placer County Transit
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
PCT10475 n/a 06 2007
Tahoe Truckee Jobs Access Reverse Commute
Program
In Placer County, Provide JARC operating assistance
to Tahoe Area Regional Transit.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 FTA 3037
$330,000 $330,000
2005 Local Agency Funds
$330,000 $330,000
2006 FTA 3037
$165,000 $165,000
2006 Local Agency Funds
$165,000 $165,000
2007 FTA 3037
$165,000 $165,000
2007 Local Agency Funds
$165,000 $165,000
$0
$0 $1,320,000 $1,320,000
Federal Project
Total Cost $1,320,000
Exempt
Category:
Operating assistance to transit agencies
SACOG ID
PLA25180 Placer County Lead Agency Placer County Transportation Planning Agency
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
PLA25180 n/a 06 JUN 2008
PCTPA Congestion Management Program
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2007 Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality
$200,000 $200,000
2007 Local Agency Funds
$25,913 $25,913
$225,913
$0
$0
$225,913
Project Description
Congestion Management Program activities for
PCTPA & City of Roseville. (For past years, see
PLA25004)
Federal Project
Total Cost $225,913
50
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
PLA25004 Placer County Lead Agency Placer County Transportation Planning Agency
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
PLA25004 n/a 06 JUN 2007
Placer County Congestion Management
Placer County Congestion Management Program for
FYs 02/03, 03/04, 04/05, 05/06, and 06/07.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
CAL17840 Sacramento County Lead Agency Caltrans District 3
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Last Revised
Completion Year
CAL17840 3C000 06 2012
I-5 HOV Lanes
EA Number
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality
$4,000,000 $4,000,000
2008 Local Agency Funds
$518,243 $518,243
$4,518,243
$0
$0 $4,518,243
Project Description
Sacramento County, I-5, from Hood-Franklin Road
Overcrossing #24-326 to US 50, add HOV lanes.
Peform Environmental and Preliminary Engineering
phase only.
Federal Project
Total Cost $4,518,243
Exempt
Category:
Specific activities which do not involve or lead directly to construction, such as: planning and technical studies, grants for training
and research programs, planning activities conducted pursuant to titles 23 and 49 U.S.c., and Federal-aid systems revisions
SACOG ID
CAL18410 Sacramento County Lead Agency Caltrans District 3
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
CAL18410 2C990 06 2013
I-5 and I-80 HOV Connectors
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality
$5,000,000 $5,000,000
2008 Local Agency Funds
$647,804 $647,804
$5,647,804
$0
$0 $5,647,804
Project Description
Add HOV lane connectors between I-5 and I-80.
Perform Environmental and Preliminary Engineering
phase only.
Federal Project
Total Cost $5,647,804
Exempt
Category:
Specific activities which do not involve or lead directly to construction, such as: planning and technical studies, grants for training
and research programs, planning activities conducted pursuant to titles 23 and 49 U.S.c., and Federal-aid systems revisions
SACOG ID
CAL18738 Sacramento County Lead Agency Caltrans District 3
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
CAL18738 0A360 06 APR 2008
I-5, Downtown Sac Rehab
In Sacramento - Route 50 to J Street (Boat Section
#24-0247M)rehabilitate structure
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006
2006
2007
2007
$6,245,791 $6,245,791
Highway Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation Program
State Cash
Highway Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation Program
State Cash
$809,209 $809,209
$7,055,000
$7,082 $33,641,400 $33,648,482
$918 $4,358,600 $4,359,518
$8,000
$38,000,000
$45,063,000
Federal Project
Total Cost $45,063,000
Exempt
Category:
Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation
52
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
CAL18739 Sacramento County Lead Agency Caltrans District 3
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
CAL18739 3A010 06 JAN 2009
I-5, SR-160 to Richards Blvd - Rehabilitation
In Sacramento, on I-5: State Route 160 to Richards
Blvd, rehabilitate pavement.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
CAL18737 Sacramento County Lead Agency Caltrans District 3
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
CAL18737 3C020 06 JUN 2009
SR 51, Upgrade Median Barrier
In Sacramento on State Route 51: H Street to Route
160; also on Route 5 (PM 22.4/24.6), upgrade median
barrier
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2008 State Cash
$230 $230
2008 State Cash
$139,820 $589,100 $728,920
2008 State Surface Transportation Program
$1,770 $1,770
2008 State Surface Transportation Program
$1,079,180 $4,546,900 $5,626,080
$1,219,000
$2,000 $5,136,000 $6,357,000
Federal Project
Total Cost $6,357,000
Exempt
Category:
Guardrails, median barriers, crash cushions
SACOG ID
CAL18766 Sacramento County Lead Agency Caltrans District 3
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
CAL18766 2E120 06 NOV 2006
SR 99 Auxiliary Lanes (Restriping)
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 National Highway System Fund
$673,713 $6,059,435 $6,733,148
2006 State Cash
$87,287 $785,065 $872,352
$761,000
$0 $6,844,500 $7,605,500
Project Description
In Sacramento County, on SR 99, from Mack Road to
Florin Road, create auxiliary lanes by restriping
mainline lanes to 11-foot width using shoulders.
Federal Project
Total Cost $7,605,500
SACOG ID
CAL18744 Sacramento County Lead Agency Caltrans District 3
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
CAL18744 1A140 06 JAN 2010
SR-51, Howe Ave. to north of Watt Ave. - replace
planting and upgrade irrigation
In Sacramento - Howe Avenue to north of Watt
Avenue - replace planting and upgrade irrigation
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
CAL18764 Sacramento County Lead Agency Caltrans District 3
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
CAL18764 2E130 06 FEB 2007
U.S. 50 Auxiliary Lanes (Restriping)
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 National Highway System Fund
$1,054,392 $180,265 $7,079,194 $8,313,851
2006 State Cash
$136,608 $23,356 $917,185 $1,077,149
$1,191,000
$203,621 $7,996,379 $9,391,000
Project Description
In Sacramento County, on U.S. 50 from Mather Field
Road to Zinfandel Drive, create auxiliary lanes by
restriping and using shoulders.
Federal Project
Total Cost $9,391,000
SACOG ID
CAL18765 Sacramento County Lead Agency Caltrans District 3
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
CAL18765 2E140 06 FEB 2007
U.S. 50 Hazel Ave. Ramp Improvements
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 National Highway System Fund
$659,548 $4,425 $3,625,303 $4,289,276
2006 State Cash
$85,452 $575 $469,697 $555,724
$745,000
$5,000 $4,095,000 $4,845,000
Project Description
In Sacramento County, on U.S. 50 at Hazel Avenue
Interchange, extend the westbound offramps from
Hazel Avenue by restriping and using shoulders to
improve the merge and weave.
Federal Project
Total Cost $4,845,000
Exempt
Category:
Interchange reconfiguration projects
SACOG ID
CAL18753 Sacramento County Lead Agency Caltrans District 3
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
CAL18753 0E840 06 FEB 2007
U.S. 50 Tree Planting
In Sacramento County, on U.S. 50, from Stockton
Blvd. to Hazel Avenue: Tree Planting
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 State Cash
$13,000 $13,000
2005 State Transportation Enhancement Activities
$87,000 $87,000
2006 State Cash
$1,300 $77,800 $79,100
2006 State Transportation Enhancement Activities
$8,700 $522,200 $530,900
$100,000
$10,000
$600,000
$710,000
Federal Project
Total Cost $710,000
Exempt
Category:
Plantings, landscaping, etc.
55
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
SAC22470 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Citrus Heights
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC22470 n/a 06 2009
Auburn Blvd Enhancements
From Sylvan Rd. to Antelope Rd.construct Class II
Bikeways, sidewalks and landscaping.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
SAC19020 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Elk Grove
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC19020 n/a 06 2006
Bond Road Widening
In Elk Grove, Bond Road from Waterman Road to
Bradshaw Road: widen from 2 to 4 lanes.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
SAC24102 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Elk Grove
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC24102 n/a 06 DEC 2007
Bradshaw Road Widening
Widen from 2 to 4 lanes.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 Developer Capital Investment
$90,000 $61,500 $151,500
2005 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$200,000 $100,000 $300,000
2006 Developer Capital Investment
$13,000 $61,500 $104,500 $179,000
2006 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$117,000 $100,000 $1,050,000 $1,267,000
2007 Developer Capital Investment
$104,500 $104,500
2007 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$1,050,000 $1,050,000
$420,000
$323,000 $2,309,000 $3,052,000
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $3,052,000
SACOG ID
SAC24103 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Elk Grove
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC24103 n/a 06 DEC 2008
Bradshaw Road Widening
In Elk Grove, from Grant Line Road to Bond Road:
Widen from 2 to 4 lanes.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$930,000 $930,000
2007 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$537,500 $4,257,000 $4,794,500
2008 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$4,257,000 $4,257,000
$1,467,500
$0 $8,514,000 $9,981,500
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $9,981,500
SACOG ID
SAC19010 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Elk Grove
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC19010 n/a 06 2006
Bruceville Road Widening
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 Developer Capital Investment
$150,000 $400,000 $1,500,000 $2,050,000
2006 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$150,000 $1,500,000 $1,650,000
$300,000
$400,000 $3,000,000 $3,700,000
Project Description
In Elk Grove, from Whitelock Parkway to Bilby Road:
Widen from 2 to 4 lanes.
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $3,700,000
58
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
SAC19100 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Elk Grove
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC19100 n/a 06 2006
Bruceville Road Widening
Widen from 2 to 4 lanes.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 Developer Capital Investment
$650,000 $650,000
2005 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$123,000 $1,590,000 $1,713,000
2006 Developer Capital Investment
$1,727,000 $1,727,000
2006 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$1,289,000 $1,289,000
$773,000 $1,590,000 $3,016,000 $5,379,000
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $5,379,000
SACOG ID
SAC24104 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Elk Grove
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC24104 n/a 06 2006
Bruceville Road Widening
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 Developer Capital Investment
$75,000 $400,000 $475,000
$75,000
$0
$400,000
$475,000
Project Description
In Elk Grove, from Laguna Blvd to Elk Grove Blvd:
Widen from 4 to 6 lanes
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $475,000
SACOG ID
SAC24105 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Elk Grove
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC24105 n/a 06 DEC 2008
Bruceville Road Widening
In Elk Grove, from Bilby Road to Kammerer Road:
Widen from 2 to 4 lanes
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2007 Developer Capital Investment
$100,000 $400,000 $500,000
2007 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$100,000 $100,000
2008 Developer Capital Investment
$75,000 $1,500,000 $1,575,000
2008 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$75,000 $1,500,000 $1,575,000
$350,000
$400,000 $3,000,000 $3,750,000
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $3,750,000
59
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
SAC24145 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Elk Grove
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC24145 n/a 06 2008
Elk Grove 10 Bus Replacement
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2007 Local Matching Funds
$750,000 $750,000
2007 Public Transportation Account
$3,300,000 $3,300,000
$0
$0 $4,050,000 $4,050,000
Project Description
Elk Grove Diesel Bus Replacement: replace 10 diesel
buses with Compressed natural gas coaches.
PPNO#3128.
Other
Total Cost $4,050,000
Exempt
Category:
Purchase of new buses and rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for minor expansions of the fleet
SACOG ID
SAC24116 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Elk Grove
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC24116 n/a 06 2007
Elk Grove Blvd @ SR 99 Northbound On-Ramp
Addition
In Elk Grove, at SR 99 and Elk Grove Blvd: Add
northbound loop on-ramp to SR 99, remove traffic
signal at existing northbound on-ramp, and add
second westbound left turn lane to existing
southbound on-ramp.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$200,000 $200,000
$200,000
$0
$0
$200,000
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $200,000
SACOG ID
SAC24106 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Elk Grove
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC24106 n/a 06 DEC 2006
Elk Grove Blvd Widening
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$75,500 $50,000 $190,000 $315,500
2006 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$190,000 $190,000
$75,500
$50,000
$380,000
$505,500
Project Description
In Elk Grove, from Union Pacific Railroad to Franklin
Blvd: Widen from 5 to 6 lanes
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $505,500
60
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
SAC24131 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Elk Grove
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC24131 n/a 06 2006
Elk Grove ITS Phase 1B
In Elk Grove, replacement of 12 traffic signal
controllers and cabinets on Laguna Blvd between
Bruceville and Elk Grove-Florin Roads.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$55,000 $55,000
2005 Sacramento County Measure A Sales Tax
$50,000 $50,000
2006 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$95,000 $95,000
2006 Intelligent Transportation System Funds
$332,000 $332,000
2006 Sacramento County Measure A Sales Tax
$238,000 $238,000
$105,000
$0
$665,000
$770,000
Federal Project
Total Cost $770,000
Exempt
Category:
Traffic control devices and operating assistance other than signalization projects
SACOG ID
SAC24132 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Elk Grove
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC24132 n/a 06 2006
Elk Grove ITS Phase 1C
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 Intelligent Transportation System Funds
$930,000 $930,000
$0
$0
$930,000
$930,000
Project Description
In Elk Grove, installation of conduit and fiber optic
cable from the City Corporation Yard to the Bond /
Laguna Master Controller building and continuing to
City Hall.
Federal Project
Total Cost $930,000
Exempt
Category:
Construction or renovation of power, signal, and communications systems
SACOG ID
SAC24060 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Elk Grove
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC24060 n/a 06 2007
Elk Grove Transit Preventive Maintenance
In Elk Grove, preventive maintenance for Elk Grove
transit operations.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 FTA 5307
$100,000 $100,000
2005 Transportation Development Act
$25,000 $25,000
2007 FTA 5307
$150,000 $150,000
2007 Local Agency Funds
$20,000 $20,000
2008 FTA 5307
$150,000 $150,000
2008 Local Agency Funds
$20,000 $20,000
$0
$0
$465,000
$465,000
Federal Project
Total Cost $465,000
Exempt
Category:
Operating assistance to transit agencies
61
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
SAC20290 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Elk Grove
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC20290 n/a 06 2006
Franklin Boulevard Widening
Widen from 2 to 6 lanes.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
SAC24113 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Elk Grove
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC24113 n/a 06 2008
Kammerer Road Widening
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2007 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$800,000 $800,000
2008 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$6,700,000 $6,700,000
$800,000
$0 $6,700,000 $7,500,000
Project Description
Widen from 2 to 6 lanes
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $7,500,000
SACOG ID
SAC24114 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Elk Grove
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC24114 n/a 06 2008
Kammerer Road Widening
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2007 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$700,000 $700,000
2008 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$6,300,000 $6,300,000
$700,000
$0 $6,300,000 $7,000,000
Project Description
In Elk Grove, from approximately 6000' west of SR 99
to Bruceville Road: Widen from 2 to 4 lanes
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $7,000,000
SACOG ID
SAC24108 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Elk Grove
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC24108 n/a 06 2007
Laguna Springs Drive Extension
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2007 Developer Capital Investment
$150,000 $850,000 $1,000,000
2007 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$300,000 $1,800,000 $2,100,000
$450,000
$0 $2,650,000 $3,100,000
Project Description
In Elk Grove, from Elk Grove Blvd to Lotz Parkway:
Construct new 4 lane roadway
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $3,100,000
63
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
SAC24109 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Elk Grove
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC24109 n/a 06 2007
Lotz Parkway
EA Number
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2007 Developer Capital Investment
$150,000 $700,000 $850,000
2007 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$100,000 $900,000 $1,000,000
$250,000
$0 $1,600,000 $1,850,000
Project Description
In Elk Grove, from Big Horn Blvd to Laguna Springs
Drive: Construct new 4 lane roadway
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $1,850,000
SACOG ID
SAC24110 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Elk Grove
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC24110 n/a 06 2007
Lotz Parkway
EA Number
In Elk Grove, from Laguna Springs Drive to Whitelock
Parkway: Construct new 4 lane roadway.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 Developer Capital Investment
$200,000 $200,000
2006 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$300,000 $300,000
2007 Developer Capital Investment
$1,800,000 $1,800,000
2007 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$1,400,000 $1,400,000
$500,000
$0 $3,200,000 $3,700,000
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $3,700,000
SACOG ID
SAC24111 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Elk Grove
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC24111 n/a 06 DEC 2008
Lotz Parkway
EA Number
In Elk Grove, from Whitelock Parkway to Kammerer
Road: Construct new 4 lane roadway
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2007 Developer Capital Investment
$900,000 $900,000
2007 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$900,000 $900,000
2008 Developer Capital Investment
$5,100,000 $5,100,000
2008 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$5,100,000 $5,100,000
$1,800,000
$0 $10,200,000 $12,000,000
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $12,000,000
64
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
SAC20520 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Elk Grove
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC20520 n/a 06 2007
SR 99 at Grantline Road
In Elk Grove, SR 99 at Grantline Road, reconstruct
interchange. This is an exempt project.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
SAC19160 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Elk Grove
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC19160 n/a 06 2007
Sheldon Road Widening
In Elk Grove, Sheldon Road from Elk Grove-Florin
Road to Waterman Road: widen from 2 to 4 lanes.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 Developer Capital Investment
$235,000 $720,000 $955,000
2005 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$500,000 $500,000
2006 Developer Capital Investment
$141,000 $720,000 $712,000 $1,573,000
2006 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$300,000 $2,100,000 $2,400,000
2007 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$2,812,000 $2,812,000
$1,176,000 $1,440,000 $5,624,000 $8,240,000
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $8,240,000
SACOG ID
SAC24120 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Elk Grove
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC24120 n/a 06 2007
Sheldon Road Widening
In Elk Grove, from Waterman Road to Bradshaw
Road: Widen from 2 to 4 lanes.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 Developer Capital Investment
$235,000 $720,000 $955,000
2005 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$500,000 $500,000
2006 Developer Capital Investment
$141,000 $720,000 $712,000 $1,573,000
2006 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$300,000 $2,100,000 $2,400,000
2007 Developer Capital Investment
$712,000 $712,000
2007 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$2,100,000 $2,100,000
$1,176,000 $1,440,000 $5,624,000 $8,240,000
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $8,240,000
SACOG ID
SAC24112 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Elk Grove
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC24112 n/a 06 DEC 2008
Waterman Road Widening
In Elk Grove, from Elk Grove Blvd to Grant Line Road:
Widen from 2 to 4 lanes.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 Developer Capital Investment
$250,000 $250,000
2006 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$450,000 $450,000
2007 Developer Capital Investment
$250,000 $600,000 $850,000
2007 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$450,000 $1,200,000 $1,650,000
2008 Developer Capital Investment
$2,800,000 $2,800,000
2008 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$5,600,000 $5,600,000
$1,400,000 $1,800,000 $8,400,000 $11,600,000
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $11,600,000
66
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
SAC24117 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Elk Grove
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC24117 n/a 06 2007
West Stockton Boulevard Widening
In Elk Grove, from Kammerer Road approximately
6000' north: Widen from 2 to 6 lanes.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 Developer Capital Investment
$900,000 $900,000
2006 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$900,000 $900,000
2007 Developer Capital Investment
$3,900,000 $3,900,000
2007 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$3,900,000 $3,900,000
$1,800,000
$0 $7,800,000 $9,600,000
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $9,600,000
SACOG ID
SAC20320 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Elk Grove
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC20320 n/a 06 2006
Whitelock Parkway Extension
In Elk Grove, from Bruceville Road to West Stockton
Blvd: construct new 4 lane roadway.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 Developer Capital Investment
$586,000 $586,000
2005 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$586,000 $266,000 $852,000
2006 Developer Capital Investment
$4,473,000 $4,473,000
2006 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$4,473,000 $4,473,000
$1,172,000
$266,000 $8,946,000 $10,384,000
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $10,384,000
SACOG ID
SAC22340 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Folsom Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC22340 n/a 06 2007
American River Bridge Below Folsom Dam
In Folsom, realign roadway and construct new bridge
over the American River downstream of Folsom Dam.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2007 Federal Demonstration Funds
$15,000,000 $62,000,000 $77,000,000
2007 Local Agency Funds
$6,000,000 $4,000,000 $18,000,000 $28,000,000
2008 State Surface Transportation Program
$5,000,000 $5,000,000
$21,000,000 $4,000,000 $85,000,000 $110,000,000
Federal Project
Total Cost $110,000,000
67
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
SAC22060 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Folsom Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC22060 n/a 06 SEP 2008
East Natoma Street Widening
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2007 Local Transportation Fund
$120,000 $120,000
2008 Local Transportation Fund
$2,000,000 $2,000,000
$120,000
$0 $2,000,000 $2,120,000
Project Description
In Folsom, East Natoma St from Fargo Way to Blue
Ravine Rd: widen from 2 to 4 lanes conjunction with
the American River Bridge below Folsom Dam
(SAC223040).
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $2,120,000
SACOG ID
SAC24063 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Folsom Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC24063 n/a 06 AUG 2007
Folsom ITS Project
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2007 Intelligent Transportation System Funds
$23,000 $23,000
2007 Local Agency Funds
$216,000 $216,000
$0
$0
$239,000
$239,000
Project Description
In Folsom, construct Intelligent Transportation
Systems infrastructure at various loactions within the
City.
Federal Project
Total Cost $239,000
Exempt
Category:
Traffic signal synchronization projects
SACOG ID
SAC24144 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Folsom Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC24144 n/a 06 2008
Folsom Transit Bus Replacement
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2007 Local Agency Funds
$355,000 $355,000
2007 Public Transportation Account
$1,545,000 $1,545,000
$0
$0 $1,900,000 $1,900,000
Project Description
In the City of Folsom, purchase six transit buses for
Folsom Stage Lines
Other
Total Cost $1,900,000
Exempt
Category:
Purchase of new buses and rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for minor expansions of the fleet
68
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
SAC24061 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Folsom Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC24061 n/a 06 2007
Folsom Transit Preventive Maintenance
In Folsom, perform preventive maintenance for
Folsom Stage Lines.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 FTA 5307
$224,000 $224,000
2005 Local Agency Funds
$56,000 $56,000
2006 FTA 5307
$228,000 $228,000
2006 Local Agency Funds
$57,000 $57,000
2007 FTA 5307
$233,000 $233,000
2007 Local Agency Funds
$58,250 $58,250
$0
$0
$856,250
$856,250
Federal Project
Total Cost $856,250
Exempt
Category:
Operating assistance to transit agencies
SACOG ID
SAC24141 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Galt Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC24141 n/a 06 2007
Replacement Buses
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 Local Agency Funds
$30,000 $30,000
2006 Transportation Development Act
$120,000 $120,000
$0
$0
$150,000
$150,000
Project Description
Purchase 2 replacement transit buses.
Other
Total Cost $150,000
Exempt
Category:
Purchase of new buses and rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for minor expansions of the fleet
69
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
SAC20580 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Galt Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC20580 n/a 06 DEC 2009
SR 99 Central Galt Interchange
In Galt, A & C Streets, Boessow Road at SR 99:
replace/reconstruct C Street interchange with 6 lane
overpass(4 through lanes and dual left turn lanes) with
bike lanes. Includes new 6 lane overpass at A Street.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
08
$980,000 $35,680,000 $36,660,000
$4,960,000 $6,460,000 $35,680,000 $47,100,000
Federal Project
Total Cost $47,100,000
SACOG ID
SAC24064 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Rancho Cordova
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC24064 n/a 06 2006
Rancho Cordova City Center
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 Local Agency Funds
$498,711 $741,910 $1,240,621
2005 Regional Surface Transportation Program
$950,000 $950,000
$498,711
$0 $1,691,910 $2,190,621
Project Description
In Rancho Cordova, Folsom Boulevard at La Loma
Drive: develop a "city center" across the street from
existing light rail station. Replace street frontage to
include a cafe sidewalk and parallel street parking
and construct a two-level parking garage.
Federal Project
Total Cost $2,190,621
70
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
SAC17784 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Sacramento Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC17784 n/a 06 JAN 2007
13th and 16th Street Light Rail Station Connectivity
Improvements
Construct improved pedestrian access, lighting and
signage around the 13th and 16th Street stations.
(This is the City of Sacramento portion of the project;
see REG17786 for the RT portion.)
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 State Cash
$2,294 $2,294
2005 State Transportation Enhancement Activities
$17,706 $17,706
2006 Local Agency Funds
$90,000 $90,000
2006 State Cash
$17,205 $7,456 $24,661
2006 State Transportation Enhancement Activities $132,795 $57,544 $190,339
2007 State Cash
$64,232 $64,232
2007 State Transportation Enhancement Activities
$495,768 $495,768
$170,000
$65,000
$650,000
$885,000
Federal Project
Total Cost $885,000
Exempt
Category:
Transportation enhancement activities (except rehabilitation and operation of historic transportation buildings, structures or facilities)
SACOG ID
SAC22680 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Sacramento Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC22680 n/a 06 2006
65th St. Bike and Pedestrian Improvements
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
SAC22640 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Sacramento Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC22640 n/a 06 2008
65th Street Pedestrian Facilities
In Sacramento, 65th Street from 14th Ave. to 21st
Ave (westside only)construct sidewalks, curb, gutter,
planter strips, street lights and storm drain
modifications.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
08
$37,000,000 $37,000,000
$10,000,000
$0 $37,000,000 $47,000,000
Project Description
Extend 6th St. between Richards Blvd. and H St.
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $47,000,000
SACOG ID
SAC22810 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Sacramento Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC22810 n/a 06 2011
7th Street
EA Number
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2007 Developer Capital Investment
$4,000,000 $4,000,000
>08
$21,000,000 $21,000,000
$4,000,000
$0 $21,000,000 $25,000,000
Project Description
Widen 7th St. to 4 lanes from E St. to Richards Blvd.
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $25,000,000
72
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
SAC22570 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Sacramento Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC22570 n/a 06 2004
Arden Fair Mall Access Improvements
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
SAC24065 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Sacramento Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC24065 n/a 06 DEC 2007
Broadway/Martin Luther King Jr. Intersection
Enhancement Project
In Sacramento, Broadway at Martin Luther King Jr.
Boulevard: construct improved curb, gutters and
sidewalk, higher visibility crosswalks, accessibility
ramps, upgrade signals and implement traffic calming
measures.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality
$110,662 $110,662
2005 Local Agency Funds
$14,338 $14,338
2007 Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality
$490,268 $490,268
2007 Local Agency Funds
$69,732 $69,732
$125,000
$0
$560,000
$685,000
Federal Project
Total Cost $685,000
Exempt
Category:
Bicycle and pedestrian facilities
SACOG ID
SAC24138 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Sacramento Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC24138 n/a 06 2008
Del Paso Rd
EA Number
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2008 Developer Capital Investment
$825,000 $825,000
$0
$0
$825,000
$825,000
Project Description
Widen Del Paso Rd from 2 to 6 lanes from El Centro
to S/B I-5 off ramp
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $825,000
SACOG ID
SAC15970 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Sacramento Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC15970 n/a 06 2007
Del Paso Road
EA Number
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
SAC18480 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Sacramento Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC18480 n/a 06 2010
Del Paso Road
EA Number
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2008 Developer Capital Investment
$3,225,000 $3,225,000
$0
$0 $3,225,000 $3,225,000
Project Description
Widen Del Paso Rd. to 4 lanes from the West City
limits to El Centro Rd. (Partially completed)
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $3,225,000
SACOG ID
SAC24068 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Sacramento Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC24068 n/a 06 JUN 2008
Docks Area Redevelopment Project
In Sacramento, north of Broadway along the
Sacramento River: perform planning for the
redevelopment of the Docks Area, including
circulation plan, infrastructure assessment, financing
plan, and related environmental review.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 Local Agency Funds
$302,810 $302,810
2005 Regional Surface Transportation Program
$377,190 $377,190
2006 Local Agency Funds
$10,000 $10,000
$690,000
$0
$0
$690,000
Federal Project
Total Cost $690,000
Exempt
Category:
Specific activities which do not involve or lead directly to construction, such as: planning and technical studies, grants for training
and research programs, planning activities conducted pursuant to titles 23 and 49 U.S.c., and Federal-aid systems revisions
SACOG ID
SAC18440 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Sacramento Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC18440 n/a 06 2010
East Commerce Way
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 Developer Capital Investment
$300,000 $300,000
2006 Developer Capital Investment
$4,800,000 $4,800,000
$300,000
$0 $4,800,000 $5,100,000
Project Description
Extend East Commerce Way from planned Club
Center Dr. to Elkhorn Blvd. as a 4 lane road.
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $5,100,000
75
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
SAC18570 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Sacramento Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC18570 n/a 06 2010
East Commerce Way
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2007 Developer Capital Investment
$321,700 $321,700
2008 Developer Capital Investment
$2,750,000 $2,750,000
$321,700
$0 $2,750,000 $3,071,700
Project Description
Extend East Commerce Way from Arena Blvd. to the
planned Natomas Crossing Drive as a 6 lane road.
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $3,071,700
SACOG ID
SAC18580 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Sacramento Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC18580 n/a 06 2010
East Commerce Way
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2007 Developer Capital Investment
$190,000 $190,000
2008 Developer Capital Investment
$2,600,000 $2,600,000
$190,000
$0 $2,600,000 $2,790,000
Project Description
Extend East Commerce Way from planned Natomas
Crossing Drive to San Juan Rd. as a 4 lane road.
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $2,790,000
SACOG ID
SAC22610 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Sacramento Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC22610 n/a 06 2011
Folsom Boulevard
EA Number
Widen Folsom Blvd. to 4 lanes, Hornet Dr. to 65th
St., and extend Ramona Avenue to the north to
connect to Folsom Blvd. (combines SAC20780 with
this project).
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
08
$42,000,000 $42,000,000
$4,473,280 $7,500,000 $42,000,000 $53,973,280
Federal Project
Total Cost $53,973,280
76
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
SAC20650 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Sacramento Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC20650 n/a 06 2006
Freeport Shores Ped/Bike Path
In Sacramento, construct new Freeport Shores
Ped/Bike Path at grade crossing of SR 160
connecting the Sacramento River Trail and the Sports
Complex.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
SAC18540 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Sacramento Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC18540 n/a 06 2010
Gateway Park Blvd
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 Developer Capital Investment
$300,000 $300,000
2008 Developer Capital Investment
$2,885,000 $2,885,000
$300,000
$0 $2,885,000 $3,185,000
Project Description
Widen Gateway Park Blvd to 4 lanes from Del Paso
Rd. to Arena Blvd. (Partially completed)
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $3,185,000
SACOG ID
SAC20800 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Sacramento Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC20800 n/a 06 2004
Howe/Power Inn Road Widening
Widen Howe/Power Inn Rd from College Town Dr to
Folsom Blvd from 4 to 6 lanes with operational
improvements and U.S. 50 ramp access
improvements
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
SAC18380 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Sacramento Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC18380 n/a 06 2008
I-5 at Cosumnes River Blvd.
Extend Consumnes River Boulevard from Franklin to
Freeport with an interchange at I-5
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
08
$67,137,370 $67,137,370
$7,754,630 $5,108,000 $67,137,370 $80,000,000
Federal Project
Total Cost $80,000,000
SACOG ID
SAC18650 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Sacramento Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC18650 n/a 06 2012
I-80 @ West El Camino Interchange
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 Developer Capital Investment
$500,000 $500,000
$500,000
$0
$0
$500,000
Project Description
Expand the West El Camino interchange on I-80 to 4
lanes and modify ramps.
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $500,000
SACOG ID
SAC22620 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Sacramento Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC22620 n/a 06 2010
I-80 Bike/Ped Bridge
Construct bike/pedestrian bridge across I-80 at the
West Canal, as well as across the West Canal.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
SAC22890 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Sacramento Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC22890 n/a 06 SEP 2006
ITS on Arden Way
EA Number
Smart Corridor on Arden Way from Del Paso to Watt
Ave.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
SAC18250 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Sacramento Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC18250 n/a 06 2007
North CBD Access Study
In Sacramento, project definition, feasibility &
pre-environmental studies for I-5/Richards I/C,
Railyards Access Rd., 7th St. Widening, Gateway
Blvd. Ext. to SR 160, Richards Blvd. widening, 6th St.
Ext. and 12th/16th NB Intersection.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
SAC16060 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Sacramento Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC16060 n/a 06 2006
Northgate Boulevard
In Sacramento, Northgate Blvd., Route 160 to Garden
Highway: elevate existing two lane roadway and
construct operational improvements at the Arden
Garden / Northgate Blvd. intersection.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
08
$766,669 $766,669
Highway Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation Program
Road Fund
$100,000 $100,000
$866,669
$0
$8,750,000 $8,750,000
$8,750,000
$9,616,669
Federal Project
Total Cost $9,616,669
Exempt
Category:
Widening narrow pavements or reconstructing bridges (no additional travel lanes)
SACOG ID
SAC22460 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Sacramento Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC22460 n/a 06 2006
Pavement Rehabilitation
In Sacramento, various streets: rehabilitate pavement.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
SAC20820 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Sacramento Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC20820 n/a 06 2005
Power Inn Road Widening
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
SAC23520 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Sacramento Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC23520 n/a 06 2012
Railyards Access Road
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 Developer Capital Investment
$2,250,000 $2,250,000
>08
$3,000,000 $9,750,000 $12,750,000
$2,250,000 $3,000,000 $9,750,000 $15,000,000
Project Description
Jibboom Street Improvements between Richards Blvd.
and the railyards site to provide access to the site
from the north.
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $15,000,000
SACOG ID
SAC20780 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Sacramento Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC20780 n/a 06 2011
Ramona Ave
EA Number
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2008 Local Agency Funds
$500,000 $500,000
$500,000
$0
$0
$500,000
Project Description
Extend two-lane roadway and center turn lane from
Brighton Rd to Folsom Blvd with bike lanes.
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $500,000
SACOG ID
SAC23840 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Sacramento Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC23840 n/a 06 2014
Richards Boulevard Widening
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 Local Agency Funds
$100,000 $100,000
>08
$3,900,000 $16,000,000 $19,900,000
$4,000,000
$0 $16,000,000 $20,000,000
Project Description
Sacramento, Richards Blvd.: from SR 160 to Bercut
Drive; widen to 6 lanes
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $20,000,000
84
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
SAC22660 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Sacramento Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC22660 n/a 06 2006
SR 160 at Richards
In Sacramento, SR 160 at Richards Boulevard: install
signalized intersection.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
SAC20350 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Sacramento Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC20350 n/a 06 DEC 2010
Sacramento Intermodal Transportation Facility
In Sacramento, develop intermodal transportation
terminal for heavy rail, light rail and bus service.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
08
$25,000,000 $25,000,000
$7,801,525
$0 $25,000,000 $32,801,525
Federal Project
Total Cost $33,801,525
Exempt
Category:
Reconstruction or renovation of transit buildings and structures (e.g., rail or bus buildings, storage and maintenance facilities,
stations, terminals, and ancillary structures)
SACOG ID
SAC16620 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Sacramento Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC16620 n/a 06 2006
Sacramento River Bike Trail
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
SAC17785 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Sacramento Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC17785 n/a 06 AUG 2008
Swanston Station Transit Village Planning
In Sacramento, Swanston Light Rail Station: perform
pre-development planning to identify circulation,
drainage and utility infrastructure improvements
necessary to support transit-oriented development in
the area.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 Regional Surface Transportation Program
$222,750 $222,750
2005 Sacramento County Measure A Sales Tax
$55,000 $55,000
2005 Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Authority $200,000 $200,000
2005 State Cash
$260,784 $260,784
2006 Local Agency Funds
$110,000 $110,000
$848,534
$0
$0
$848,534
Federal Project
Total Cost $848,534
Exempt
Category:
Specific activities which do not involve or lead directly to construction, such as: planning and technical studies, grants for training
and research programs, planning activities conducted pursuant to titles 23 and 49 U.S.c., and Federal-aid systems revisions
SACOG ID
SAC22171 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Sacramento Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC22171 n/a 06 2005
Taylor Street School Pedestrian Safety
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
SAC17990 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Sacramento Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC17990 n/a 06 DEC 2007
Tower Bridge Sidewalk Widening
In Sacramento, Tower Bridge: construct a wider
pedestrian and bike path across the Sacramento
River. City of Sacramento and City of West
Sacramento joint project.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
SAC20720 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Sacramento Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC20720 n/a 06 2007
Ueda Parkway Bikeway
Construct bike trail on the west side of the levee of
the Natomas East Main Drain from Arden Garden to
Elkhorn, Arcade Creek and Dry Creek trails.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
SAC21710 Sacramento County Lead Agency SACOG
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC21710 0L0784 06 2009
Sacramento County PPM
Plan, program and monitor
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 State Cash
$143,000 $143,000
2007 State Cash
$143,000 $143,000
2008 State Cash
$143,000 $143,000
>08
$978,000 $978,000
$0
$0 $1,407,000 $1,407,000
Other
Total Cost $1,407,000
Exempt
Category:
Specific activities which do not involve or lead directly to construction, such as: planning and technical studies, grants for training
and research programs, planning activities conducted pursuant to titles 23 and 49 U.S.c., and Federal-aid systems revisions
SACOG ID
SAC22405 Sacramento County Lead Agency Sacramento County Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC22405 n/a 06 2006
2004 & 2005 Road Rehabilitation
In Sacramento County, various locations: rehabilitate
pavement.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
SAC19310 Sacramento County Lead Agency Sacramento County Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC19310 n/a 06 2009
Bradshaw Rd.
EA Number
Widen from Calvine Rd. to Florin Rd. from 2 lanes to
4 lanes
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
08
$3,881,000 $3,881,000
$1,781,000
$929,000 $12,626,000 $15,336,000
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $15,336,000
SACOG ID
SAC19320 Sacramento County Lead Agency Sacramento County Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC19320 n/a 06 2007
Bradshaw Road Widening
Widen Bradshaw Rd from Florin to Morrison Creek
from 2 to 4 lanes
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
SAC19040 Sacramento County Lead Agency Sacramento County Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC19040 n/a 06 MAY 2007
Calvine Road Widening
In Sacramento County, Calvine Road from 1000 feet
east of Kingsbridge Drive to Vineyard Road, widen
from 2 to 4 lanes.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
SAC15230 Sacramento County Lead Agency Sacramento County Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC15230 n/a 06 2010
Elkhorn Blvd. Widening
In Sacramento County, Elkhorn Blvd. from Watt Ave.
to Don Julio Blvd.: widen from 4 to 6 lanes.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
08
$5,268,000 $5,268,000
$1,979,000
$116,000 $7,268,000 $9,363,000
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $9,363,000
SACOG ID
SAC19620 Sacramento County Lead Agency Sacramento County Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC19620 03-928432 06 2009
Elverta Road Widening
Widen Elverta Rd. from Dutch Haven Blvd. to Watt
Ave. from 2 to 4 lanes including Dry Creek Bridge to 6
lanes capacity (striped for 4).
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
SAC19621 Sacramento County Lead Agency Sacramento County Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC19621 n/a 06 2010
Elverta Road Widening
Widen Elverta Rd. from Rio Linda Blvd. to Dutch
Haven Blvd. from 2 to 4 lanes including landscaped
median, ADA improvements, transit access and
bike/pedestrian facilities.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2008 Developer Capital Investment
$756,000 $756,000
2008 Sacramento County Measure A Sales Tax
$300,000 $300,000
>08
$300,000 $6,000,000 $6,300,000
$1,056,000
$300,000 $6,000,000 $7,356,000
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $7,356,000
SACOG ID
SAC16800 Sacramento County Lead Agency Sacramento County Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC16800 n/a 06 2010
Fair Oaks Boulevard Widening
Widen Fair Oaks Blvd from Marconi Ave. to Engle Rd.
from 4 to 6 lanes including signal modifications at
Marconi, Stanley, Grant, and Engle Rd.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
08
$4,352,000 $4,352,000
$1,069,000 $4,313,000 $4,352,000 $9,734,000
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $9,734,000
94
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
SAC22690 Sacramento County Lead Agency Sacramento County Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC22690 n/a 06 2007
Florin Road Enhancements
In Sacramento County, Florin Road from Stockton
Blvd. to Elk Grove-Florin Road: construct sidewalks,
bikeways, medians, lighting, landscaping and
streetscaping.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
SAC21480 Sacramento County Lead Agency Sacramento County Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC21480 n/a 06 2006
Franklin Boulevard Streetscaping
Project development to provide landscaping and
streetscaping on Franklin Blvd. between Turnbridge
Road and 38th Ave., and along 47th Ave., Franklin
Blvd to Light Rail Tracks.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
SAC24062 Sacramento County Lead Agency Sacramento County Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC24062 n/a 06 2007
Galt / South Sacramento County Transit Operating
Assistance
In Galt and south Sacramento County, operating
assistance for South County Transit.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 FTA 5307
$616,321 $616,321
2005 Local Agency Funds
$154,080 $154,080
2006 FTA 5307
$295,879 $295,879
2006 Transportation Development Act
$295,879 $295,879
2007 FTA 5307
$319,700 $319,700
2007 Transportation Development Act
$319,700 $319,700
$0
$0 $2,001,559 $2,001,559
Federal Project
Total Cost $2,001,559
Exempt
Category:
Operating assistance to transit agencies
SACOG ID
SAC24035 Sacramento County Lead Agency Sacramento County Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC24035 n/a 06 2008
Gerber Road Widening Project
Widen Gerber Road between Elk Grove-Florin Road
and Bradshaw Road from 2 to 4 lanes.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 Benefit Assessment District
$83,000 $83,000
2006 Benefit Assessment District
$347,000 $13,000 $360,000
2007 Benefit Assessment District
$180,000 $3,231,000 $3,411,000
$430,000
$193,000 $3,231,000 $3,854,000
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $3,854,000
SACOG ID
SAC19660 Sacramento County Lead Agency Sacramento County Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC19660 n/a 06 2011
Grantline Rd.
EA Number
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2008 Local Agency Funds
$600,000 $600,000
>08
$3,400,000 $3,400,000
$600,000
$0 $3,400,000 $4,000,000
Project Description
Widen from Sloughouse Rd. to Sunrise Blvd. from 2
to 4 lanes
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $4,000,000
97
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
SAC19670 Sacramento County Lead Agency Sacramento County Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC19670 n/a 06 2010
Grantline Rd.
EA Number
Widen from 800 ft. North East of Spanish Grant Rd.
to Sloughouse Rd. from 2 to 4 lanes.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 Developer Capital Investment
$467,000 $331,000 $798,000
2006 Sacramento County Measure A Sales Tax
$260,000 $260,000
2007 Developer Capital Investment
$4,095,000 $4,095,000
2007 Sacramento County Measure A Sales Tax
$1,457,000 $1,457,000
$727,000
$331,000 $5,552,000 $6,610,000
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $6,610,000
SACOG ID
SAC19090 Sacramento County Lead Agency Sacramento County Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC19090 n/a 06 2011
Greenback Lane Widening
Widen Greenback Lane from Sunrise Blvd to Hazel
Ave from 4 to 6 lanes
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 Developer Capital Investment
$130,000 $130,000
2007 Developer Capital Investment
$110,000 $110,000
2008 Developer Capital Investment
$1,500,000 $300,000 $1,800,000
2008 Local Agency Funds
$1,900,000 $1,900,000
2008 Sacramento County Measure A Sales Tax
$1,800,000 $1,800,000
>08
$300,000 $5,000,000 $14,100,000 $19,400,000
$2,040,000 $9,000,000 $14,100,000 $25,140,000
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $25,140,000
98
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
SAC21500 Sacramento County Lead Agency Sacramento County Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC21500 n/a 06 2011
Hazel Avenue Improvements
Widen American.River bridge and approaches from 4
to 6 lanes and widen Hazel from A.R. bridge to
Madison from 4 to 6 lanes with bike lanes and signals
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
08
$43,832,000 $43,832,000
$10,940,000 $23,500,000 $50,750,000 $85,190,000
Federal Project
Total Cost $85,190,000
SACOG ID
SAC22290 Sacramento County Lead Agency Sacramento County Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC22290 n/a 06 2006
I-80 Bicycle / Pedestrian Crossing
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 Local Agency Funds
$500,000 $500,000
2006 Sacramento County Measure A Sales Tax
$50,000 $50,000
$550,000
$0
$0
$550,000
Project Description
In Sacramento County, conduct studies, and
environmental work for a bicycle/ped crossing of I-80
W of Madison Avenue.
Other
Total Cost $550,000
Exempt
Category:
Specific activities which do not involve or lead directly to construction, such as: planning and technical studies, grants for training
and research programs, planning activities conducted pursuant to titles 23 and 49 U.S.c., and Federal-aid systems revisions
99
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
SAC24037 Sacramento County Lead Agency Sacramento County Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC24037 n/a 06 2007
Intersection Improvements Disabled Access
2004/2005
This project provides for the development and
implementation of audible signals and other ADA
compliant upgrades at various locations throughout
the County of Sacramento. The audible signals will
be installed in accordance with the latest County
Standards and current ADA requirements. The
locations are based on citizen's requests and
recommended by the County's Physical Access
Subcommittee (PASC) of the Disability Advisory
Committee. The locations are: 1)Alta Arden
Expressway@Morse Ave; 2)Arden Way@Watt Ave;
3) Auburn Blvd@Hemlock St; 4)Arden
Way@Professional Dr; 5)El Camino Ave@Yorktown
Ave; 6)Auburn Blvd@Palm Ave; 7)Auburn
Blvd@Garfield Ave; 8)Fair Oaks Blvd@Sunrise Blvd;
9)San Juan Ave@Sunset Ave; 10) Cottage Way@Bell
St; 11)Howe Ave@Hurley Way; 12)Fulton
Ave@Hurley Way; 13)Watt Ave@Kings Way/Chenu
Ave; 14)Mather Field Rd@Mills Station Rd.
Locations may be added or deleted based on the
PASC's subsequent recommendations.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 Sacramento County Measure A Sales Tax
$129,000 $129,000
2006 Sacramento County Measure A Sales Tax
$819,000 $819,000
$129,000
$0
$819,000
$948,000
Other
Total Cost $948,000
Exempt
Category:
Bicycle and pedestrian facilities
100
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
SAC15200 Sacramento County Lead Agency Sacramento County Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC15200 n/a 06 2008
Left-Turn Lanes - Various Locations
In Sacramento County, various locations, installation
of left turn lanes in accordance with the county DOT's
Project Priority List.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 Local Agency Funds
$105,750 $105,750
2007 Local Agency Funds
$50,000 $41,000 $91,000
2008 Local Agency Funds
$508,250 $508,250
$155,750
$41,000
$508,250
$705,000
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $705,000
SACOG ID
SAC16500 Sacramento County Lead Agency Sacramento County Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC16500 n/a 06 2010
Madison Avenue Widening
Widen Madison Avenue from Sunrise Blvd. to Hazel
Ave. from 4 to 6 lanes
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 Sacramento County Measure A Sales Tax
$142,000 $142,000
2007 Sacramento County Measure A Sales Tax
$340,000 $340,000
2008 Developer Capital Investment
$750,000 $250,000 $1,000,000
2008 Local Agency Funds
$1,000,000 $1,000,000
2008 Sacramento County Measure A Sales Tax $1,000,000 $1,000,000
>08
$13,750,000 $13,750,000
$2,232,000 $1,250,000 $13,750,000 $17,232,000
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $17,232,000
SACOG ID
SAC18150 Sacramento County Lead Agency Sacramento County Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC18150 n/a 06 2007
Metro Air Parkway Interchange at I-5
Construct new interchange on I-5 at Metro Air
Parkway near Sacramento International Airport
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
SAC24142 Sacramento County Lead Agency Sacramento County Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC24142 n/a 06 2007
Operating Assistance
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 FTA 3037
$128,000 $128,000
2006 Local Agency Funds
$128,000 $128,000
$0
$0
$256,000
$256,000
Project Description
Deparment of Human Assistance JARC operating
assistance.
Federal Project
Total Cost $256,000
SACOG ID
SAC23980 Sacramento County Lead Agency Sacramento County Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC23980 n/a 06 2008
Pedestrian Master Plan Implementation Project
Construct pedestrian facilities and improvements in
various locations throughout Sacramento County in
accordance with the adopted Sacramento County
Pedestrian Master Plan. The project includes
improvements to existing corridors to enhance
pedestrian safety and mobility, including sidewalk
and walkway construction, pedestrian signal
installation, improvements to existing signalized and
non-signalized intersections and pedestrian
crossings, and other improvements to benefit
pedestrian access and safety. All improvements will
be constructed in compliance with pedestrian facility
improvement standards set forth in the adopted
Master Plan.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality
$500,000 $500,000
2005 Sacramento County Measure A Sales Tax
$65,000 $65,000
2007 Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality
$2,729,000 $2,729,000
2007 Sacramento County Measure A Sales Tax
$1,302,000 $1,302,000
$565,000
$0 $4,031,000 $4,596,000
Federal Project
Total Cost $4,596,000
Exempt
Category:
Bicycle and pedestrian facilities
102
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
SAC24126 Sacramento County Lead Agency Sacramento County Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC24126 n/a 06 2007
Road Rehab I
EA Number
Pavement rehabilitation.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 Local Agency Funds
$50,000 $344,750 $394,750
2005 Regional Surface Transportation Program
$1,500,000 $1,500,000
2006 Local Agency Funds
$105,250 $105,250
$50,000
$0 $1,950,000 $2,000,000
Federal Project
Total Cost $2,000,000
Exempt
Category:
Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation
SACOG ID
SAC24127 Sacramento County Lead Agency Sacramento County Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC24127 n/a 06 2007
Road Rehab II
EA Number
Pavement Rehabilitation.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 Local Agency Funds
$50,000 $159,750 $209,750
2005 Regional Surface Transportation Program
$1,000,000 $1,000,000
2006 Local Agency Funds
$100,000 $100,000
$50,000
$0 $1,259,750 $1,309,750
Federal Project
Total Cost $1,309,750
Exempt
Category:
Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation
SACOG ID
SAC22050 Sacramento County Lead Agency Sacramento County Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC22050 n/a 06 2006
Road Rehabilitation
2002/03 Road Rehabilitation
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
SAC24128 Sacramento County Lead Agency Sacramento County Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC24128 n/a 06 2009
SR99/Elverta Rd Intersection Improvements and
SR99/Elkhorn Blvd Interchange Signalization
In Sacramento County, SR 99 at Elverta Rd
Intersection: Construct intersection channelization
with an EB left turn lane and modifications to the
existing traffic signal; SR 99 at Elkhorn Boulevard
interchange: construct NB and SB exit ramp terminus
signalization.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 Developer Capital Investment
$55,000 $55,000
2006 Developer Capital Investment
$314,000 $13,000 $327,000
2007 Developer Capital Investment
$339,000 $11,000 $350,000
2008 Developer Capital Investment
$341,000 $678,000 $1,019,000
>08
$2,517,000 $2,517,000
$708,000
$365,000 $3,195,000 $4,268,000
Other
Total Cost $4,268,000
Exempt
Category:
Interchange reconfiguration projects
SACOG ID
SAC21591 Sacramento County Lead Agency Sacramento County Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC21591 03-928170 06 2006
Sacramento Northern Bikeway Extension
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
SAC19350 Sacramento County Lead Agency Sacramento County Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC19350 n/a 06 2011
Sacramento U.S. 50/Watt Avenue Interchange
Modification
Modify the freeway interchange at U.S. 50 and Watt
Ave.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
08
$22,300,000 $22,300,000
$3,894,341
$100,000 $25,500,000 $29,494,341
Federal Project
Total Cost $29,494,341
SACOG ID
SAC24143 Sacramento County Lead Agency Sacramento County Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC24143 n/a 06 2007
South County Transit Link Operating Assistance
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 FTA 5311
$143,712 $143,712
2006 Transportation Development Act
$35,928 $35,928
$0
$0
$179,640
$179,640
Project Description
South County Transit Link Operating Assistance
Federal Project
Total Cost $179,640
Exempt
Category:
Operating assistance to transit agencies
SACOG ID
SAC23270 Sacramento County Lead Agency Sacramento County Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC23270 n/a 06 2007
South County Transit Operations
South Sacramento County to north San Joaquin
County: provide hourly jobs access transit service
between Lodi, Galt, Elk Grove and south Sacramento
County
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
SAC19170 Sacramento County Lead Agency Sacramento County Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC19170 n/a 06 2008
South Watt Avenue Widening
Widen South Watt Avenue from Alderson Ave to
Route 16 from 2 to 4 lanes with left turn lanes
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
08
$6,761,000 $6,761,000
$357,000
$875,000 $8,241,000 $9,473,000
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $9,473,000
SACOG ID
SAC24036 Sacramento County Lead Agency Sacramento County Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC24036 n/a 06 2008
Vineyard Road Bridge Replacement
In Sacramento County, replace two existing bridges
on Vineyard Road and widen to an arterial roadway
width. The bridges are located at Laguna Creek and
a tributary of Elder Creek.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 Benefit Assessment District
$357,000 $357,000
2006 Benefit Assessment District
$200,000 $1,656,000 $1,856,000
2007 Benefit Assessment District
$1,640,000 $1,640,000
$357,000
$200,000 $3,296,000 $3,853,000
Other
Total Cost $3,853,000
Exempt
Category:
Widening narrow pavements or reconstructing bridges (no additional travel lanes)
106
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
SAC22070 Sacramento County Lead Agency Sacramento County Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC22070 n/a 06 2007
Watt Ave. Phase 3 ITS Project
In Sacramento County, Watt Avenue Corridor,
implement phase 3 priority and mobility
enhancement demonstration project.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
SAC21610 Sacramento County Lead Agency Sacramento County Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC21610 n/a 06 2006
Watt Avenue Enhancements Phase 3
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
REG15040 Sacramento County Lead Agency Sacramento Regional Transit District
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
REG15040 R824SA 06 SEP 2006
Amtrak / Folsom Corridor Light Rail Project
Folsom Corridor - Downtown Sacramento Folsom -
light rail extension (including vehicle purchase)
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
REG15880 Sacramento County Lead Agency Sacramento Regional Transit District
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
REG15880 n/a 06 2007
LRV Rehabilitation Program
Sacramento Regional Transit District: rehabilitation
of light rail vehicles.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
REG15282 Sacramento County Lead Agency Sacramento Regional Transit District
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
REG15282 n/a 06 2006
OCS/Substation Upgrades
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 FTA 5309 (a) - Fixed Guideway Modernization
$407,411 $407,411
2006 Sacramento County Measure A Sales Tax
$101,853 $101,853
$0
$0
$509,264
$509,264
Project Description
Sacramento Regional Transit District: purchase
equipment to support light rail operations, including
but not limited to replacement parts for substations
and overhead catenary, lighting and signal crossing
equipment, supervisory controletc.
Federal Project
Total Cost $509,264
Exempt
Category:
Purchase of operating equipment for vehicles (e.g., radios, fareboxes, lifts, etc.)
SACOG ID
REG17781 Sacramento County Lead Agency Sacramento Regional Transit District
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
REG17781 n/a 06 2030
Paratransit Vehicle Acquisition
Sacramento Regional Transit District: purchase up to
26 ADA paratransit replacement vehicles, funding
through 2006. Purchase additional 395 paratransit
vehicles for fleet replacement.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 FTA 5307
$367,546 $367,546
2005 Local Agency Funds
$300,161 $300,161
>08
$33,575,000 $33,575,000
$0
$0 $34,242,707 $34,242,707
Federal Project
Total Cost $34,242,707
Exempt
Category:
Purchase of new buses and rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for minor expansions of the fleet
111
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
REG16680 Sacramento County Lead Agency Sacramento Regional Transit District
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
REG16680 n/a 06 2008
RT Preventive Maintenance
Sacramento Regional Transit District: provide for
scheduled and unscheduled maintenance for bus and
light rail revenue vehicles and facilities.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 FTA 5307
$16,636,352 $16,636,352
2005 FTA 5309 (a) - Fixed Guideway Modernization
$3,022,929 $3,022,929
2005 Local Transportation Fund
$4,914,820 $4,914,820
2006 FTA 5307
$14,664,644 $14,664,644
2006 FTA 5309 (a) - Fixed Guideway Modernization
$4,112,308 $4,112,308
2006 Local Transportation Fund
$4,694,248 $4,694,248
2007 FTA 5307
$13,468,000 $13,468,000
2007 FTA 5309 (a) - Fixed Guideway Modernization
$3,590,150 $3,590,150
2007 Local Transportation Fund
$4,280,703 $4,280,703
2008 FTA 5307
$14,545,440 $14,545,440
2008 FTA 5309 (a) - Fixed Guideway Modernization
$3,877,350 $3,877,350
2008 Local Transportation Fund
$4,623,429 $4,623,429
$0
$0 $92,430,373 $92,430,373
Federal Project
Total Cost $92,430,373
Exempt
Category:
Operating assistance to transit agencies
SACOG ID
REG17782 Sacramento County Lead Agency Sacramento Regional Transit District
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
REG17782 n/a 06 2010
SRTD CNG Bus Replacement
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2007 Local Agency Funds
$10,502,315 $10,502,315
2007 Public Transportation Account
$38,300,000 $38,300,000
$0
$0 $48,802,315 $48,802,315
Project Description
Sacramento Regional Transit District: Bus
Acquisitions - 95 CNG Replacement Buses and 40
Paratransit Vehicles.
Other
Total Cost $48,802,315
Exempt
Category:
Purchase of new buses and rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for minor expansions of the fleet
112
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
REG16670 Sacramento County Lead Agency Sacramento Regional Transit District
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
REG16670 n/a 06 2007
SRTD Operating Assistance
Sacramento Regional Transit District: operation of
transit service.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
REG15053 Sacramento County Lead Agency Sacramento Regional Transit District
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
REG15053 n/a 06 2010
South Sacramento Light Rail - Phase 2 Extension
In Sacramento, South Line light rail extension from
Meadowview Road to Cosumnes River College.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
08
$72,042,000 $72,042,000
$21,079,000 $25,490,000 $155,960,000 $202,529,000
Federal Project
Total Cost $202,529,000
SACOG ID
REG17795 Sacramento County Lead Agency Sacramento Regional Transit District
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
REG17795 n/a 06 2007
Transit Enhancements
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 FTA 5307
$176,209 $176,209
2006 Transportation Development Act
$44,053 $44,053
$0
$0
$220,262
$220,262
Project Description
Transit Enhancements
Federal Project
Total Cost $220,262
Exempt
Category:
Transportation enhancement activities (except rehabilitation and operation of historic transportation buildings, structures or facilities)
114
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
CAL18760 Sutter County Lead Agency Caltrans District 3
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
CAL18760 1A97W 06 JUN 2009
Roadway Rehab near Yuba City
Roadway Rehabilitation, near Yuba City, from
Sacramento River Bridge to Hagerman Road in Sutter
County.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
CAL18742 Sutter County Lead Agency Caltrans District 3
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
CAL18742 1A910 06 SEP 2008
SR-99, Yuba City - Rehabilitate Roadway
In Yuba City - Lincoln Road to Butte House Road -
rehabilitate roadway
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 National Highway System Fund
$1,761,747 $1,761,747
2005 State Cash
$228,253 $228,253
2006 National Highway System Fund
$10,906,010 $10,906,010
2006 National Highway System Fund
$1,613,901 $1,613,901
2006 State Cash
$1,412,990 $1,412,990
2006 State Cash
$209,099 $209,099
$1,990,000 $1,823,000 $12,319,000 $16,132,000
Federal Project
Total Cost $16,132,000
Exempt
Category:
Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation
SACOG ID
CAL17270 Sutter County Lead Agency Caltrans District 3
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
CAL17270 1A4310 06 DEC 2008
Sutter Route 99 Corridor Project
Near Yuba City, SR 99, Route 70 junction to Garden
Highway (Segment 1) - widen to 4 lanes with a
continuous left-turn lane.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
CAL17350 Sutter County Lead Agency Caltrans District 3
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
CAL17350 386420 06 2012
Sutter/Yuba Route 70 Corridor Project
Near Rio Oso - Cornelius Avenue to Bear River Bridge
(Yuba County) - construct 4-lane expressway
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
08
$100,000 $100,000
Highway Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation Program
Local Agency Funds
$1,985,000 $1,985,000
$2,000,000 $2,000,000
$4,085,000
$0
$0
$4,085,000
Federal Project
Total Cost $4,085,000
Exempt
Category:
Widening narrow pavements or reconstructing bridges (no additional travel lanes)
SACOG ID
SUT10828 Sutter County Lead Agency Sutter County Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SUT10828 n/a 06 2012
Four Lane Crossing of Feather River at 5th St
Reconstruct or modify the existing 5th Street Bridge
and Railroad Trestle to provide a four lane crossing of
the Feather River between Yuba City and Marysville
as well as providing improvements to connector roads
from east to west.
Fed Demonstration HPP# 3631
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 Federal Demonstration Funds
$1,600,000 $1,600,000
2007 Federal Demonstration Funds
$800,000 $800,000
2008 Federal Demonstration Funds
$800,000 $800,000
>08
$800,000 $800,000
$4,000,000
$0
$0 $4,000,000
Federal Project
Total Cost $4,000,000
Exempt
Category:
Widening narrow pavements or reconstructing bridges (no additional travel lanes)
117
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
SUT10789 Sutter County Lead Agency Sutter County Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SUT10789 n/a 06 AUG 2006
George Washington Road
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 Local Agency Funds
$65,000 $65,000
2006 Regional Surface Transportation Program
$185,000 $185,000
$0
$0
$250,000
$250,000
Project Description
conform grind,level course,fabric,overlay,shoulders
Federal Project
Total Cost $250,000
Exempt
Category:
Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation
SACOG ID
SUT10510 Sutter County Lead Agency Sutter County Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
Last Revised
Completion Year
SUT10510 n/a 06 2009
Pacific Avenue
EA Number
Widen from 2 to 4 lanes from Sankey Road to Riego
Road.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2007 Developer Capital Investment
$500,000 $500,000
2008 Developer Capital Investment
$300,000 $300,000
>08
$6,000,000 $6,000,000
$500,000
$300,000 $6,000,000 $6,800,000
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $6,800,000
SACOG ID
SUT10792 Sutter County Lead Agency Sutter County Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SUT10792 n/a 06 AUG 2007
Pleasant Grove Road
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2007 Local Agency Funds
$450,000 $450,000
$0
$0
$450,000
$450,000
Project Description
In Sutter County, Pleasant Grove Road from Betz
Road to Kempton Road and from Marcum Road to
Auburn Ravine: conform grind,level
course,fabric,overlay,shoulders
Other
Total Cost $450,000
Exempt
Category:
Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation
118
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
SUT10330 Sutter County Lead Agency Sutter County Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Last Revised
Completion Year
SUT10330 n/a 06 2009
Riego Road
EA Number
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2008 Developer Capital Investment
$1,200,000 $1,200,000
>08
$100,000 $8,056,000 $8,156,000
$1,200,000
$100,000 $8,056,000 $9,356,000
Project Description
In Sutter County, Riego Road from SR 99 to Power
Line Road: widen from 2 to 4 lanes.
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $9,356,000
SACOG ID
SUT10350 Sutter County Lead Agency Sutter County Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Last Revised
Completion Year
SUT10350 n/a 06 2007
Riego Road
EA Number
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2008 Developer Capital Investment
$750,000 $750,000
>08
$100,000 $4,975,000 $5,075,000
$750,000
$100,000 $4,975,000 $5,825,000
Project Description
In Sutter County, Riego Road from SR 99 to Pacific
Avenue: widen from 2 to 6 lanes.
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $5,825,000
SACOG ID
SUT10400 Sutter County Lead Agency Sutter County Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Last Revised
Completion Year
SUT10400 n/a 06 2007
Riego Road
EA Number
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 Developer Capital Investment
$1,800,000 $1,800,000
2007 Developer Capital Investment
$100,000 $12,027,000 $12,127,000
$1,800,000
$100,000 $12,027,000 $13,927,000
Project Description
In Sutter County, Riego Road from Road F to
Pleasant Grove Road: widen from 2 to 6 lanes
including grade separation at RR xing.
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $13,927,000
119
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
SUT10360 Sutter County Lead Agency Sutter County Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Last Revised
Completion Year
SUT10360 n/a 06 2007
Riego Road
EA Number
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 Developer Capital Investment
$1,000,000 $1,000,000
2007 Developer Capital Investment
$100,000 $6,598,000 $6,698,000
$1,000,000
$100,000 $6,598,000 $7,698,000
Project Description
In Sutter County, Riego Road from Pacific Avenue to
Road F: widen from 2 to 6 lanes.
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $7,698,000
SACOG ID
SUT10710 Sutter County Lead Agency Sutter County Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Last Revised
Completion Year
SUT10710 n/a 06 2009
Road A
EA Number
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2008 Developer Capital Investment
$325,000 $325,000
>08
$100,000 $2,153,000 $2,253,000
$325,000
$100,000 $2,153,000 $2,578,000
Project Description
In Sutter County, Road A 1 mile west of SR 99 from
Riego Road to one half mile south: construct new 4
lane road.
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $2,578,000
SACOG ID
SUT10720 Sutter County Lead Agency Sutter County Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Last Revised
Completion Year
SUT10720 n/a 06 2009
Road B
EA Number
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2008 Developer Capital Investment
$350,000 $350,000
>08
$100,000 $2,243,000 $2,343,000
$350,000
$100,000 $2,243,000 $2,693,000
Project Description
In Sutter County, one half mile west of SR 99, from
Riego Road to one half mile south: construct new 4
lane road.
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $2,693,000
120
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
SUT10730 Sutter County Lead Agency Sutter County Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Last Revised
Completion Year
SUT10730 n/a 06 2009
Road C
EA Number
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2008 Developer Capital Investment
$450,000 $450,000
>08
$100,000 $3,074,000 $3,174,000
$450,000
$100,000 $3,074,000 $3,624,000
Project Description
In Sutter County, one half mile south of Riego Road,
from Road A to Road B: construct new 4 lane road.
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $3,624,000
SACOG ID
SUT10740 Sutter County Lead Agency Sutter County Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Last Revised
Completion Year
SUT10740 n/a 06 2009
Road D
EA Number
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2008 Developer Capital Investment
$350,000 $350,000
>08
$100,000 $2,243,000 $2,343,000
$350,000
$100,000 $2,243,000 $2,693,000
Project Description
In Sutter County, one half mile east of SR 99, from
Riego Road to one half mile south: construct new 4
lane road.
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $2,693,000
SACOG ID
SUT10750 Sutter County Lead Agency Sutter County Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Last Revised
Completion Year
SUT10750 n/a 06 2009
Road E
EA Number
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2008 Developer Capital Investment
$950,000 $950,000
>08
$100,000 $6,371,000 $6,471,000
$950,000
$100,000 $6,371,000 $7,421,000
Project Description
In Sutter County, one half mile south of Riego Road
between Road D and Road F: construct new 4 lane
road.
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $7,421,000
121
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
SUT10760 Sutter County Lead Agency Sutter County Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Last Revised
Completion Year
SUT10760 n/a 06 2009
Road F
EA Number
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2008 Developer Capital Investment
$450,000 $450,000
>08
$100,000 $2,965,000 $3,065,000
$450,000
$100,000 $2,965,000 $3,515,000
Project Description
In Sutter County, one mile east of Pacific Avenue
from Riego Road to Road E: construct new 4 lane
road.
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $3,515,000
SACOG ID
CAL16950 Sutter County Lead Agency Sutter County Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
CAL16950 n/a 06 2009
SR 99 Riego Road Interchange
In Sutter County, SR 99 at Riego Road, construct
new five-lane interchange.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 Local Agency Funds
$340,000 $340,000
2007 State Cash
$114,700 $114,700
2007 State Surface Transportation Program
$885,300 $885,300
2008 Developer Capital Investment
$2,970,000 $2,970,000
>08
$24,200,000 $24,200,000
$1,340,000 $2,970,000 $24,200,000 $28,510,000
Federal Project
Total Cost $28,510,000
SACOG ID
SUT10470 Sutter County Lead Agency Yuba City Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SUT10470 n/a 06 2007
Bridge Street Railroad Crossing
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 Local Agency Funds
$117,781 $117,781
$0
$0
$117,781
$117,781
Project Description
In Yuba City, railroad crossing at Bridge Street and
Shasta Street: improve railroad crossing by adding
concrete panels.
Other
Total Cost $117,781
Exempt
Category:
Railroad/highway crossing
122
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
SUT10280 Sutter County Lead Agency Yuba City Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SUT10280 n/a 06 2007
Bridge Street at 2nd St. Realignment
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2007 Local Agency Funds
$672,000 $672,000
$0
$0
$672,000
$672,000
Project Description
In Yuba City, Bridge Street at Second Street: realign
Second Street north of the 5th Street Bridge and
install traffic signal.
Other
Total Cost $672,000
Exempt
Category:
Intersection signalization projects at individual intersections
SACOG ID
SUT10241 Sutter County Lead Agency Yuba City Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SUT10241 n/a 06 2007
Walton Avenue Widening
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2007 Local Agency Funds
$44,250 $132,750 $732,000 $909,000
$44,250
$132,750
$732,000
$909,000
Project Description
Widen Walton Ave from Lincoln Rd. to Bridge St.
from 2-3 lanes to 5 lanes including upgrades to bike
lanes, sidewalks, curbs, gutters, and drainage
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $909,000
SACOG ID
CAL18757 Various Counties Lead Agency Caltrans District 3
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
CAL18757 0E6801 06 JAN 2007
Median Barrier Safety Project - Yolo, El Dorado,
Placer, & Sacramento Counties
Safety Improvements project to construct thrie beam
median barrier at 6 locations in 4 counties within
District 3.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
CAL18736 Various Counties Lead Agency Caltrans District 3
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
CAL18736 1C170 06 NOV 2007
Metal Beam Guard Rail
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2007 National Highway System-Safety Program
$691,419 $1,934,380 $2,625,799
$691,419
$0 $1,934,380 $2,625,799
Project Description
In Sacramento, Placer, Yuba, and Yolo Counties - on
various routes - upgrade metal beam guard rail end
treatments
Federal Project
Total Cost $2,625,799
Exempt
Category:
Guardrails, median barriers, crash cushions
SACOG ID
CAL17380 Various Counties Lead Agency Caltrans District 3
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
CAL17380 n/a 06 2007
SACOG Region Emergency Repair Program
Lump Sum - Emergency Repair with non-ER funds
(non-capacity increasing projects only)
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 Other Federal Funds
$100,000 $100,000
2007 Other Federal Funds
$100,000 $100,000
2008 Other Federal Funds
$100,000 $100,000
$0
$0
$300,000
$300,000
Federal Project
Total Cost $300,000
Exempt
Category:
Repair of damage caused by natural disasters, civil unrest, or terrorist acts, except projects involving substantial functional,
locational or capacity changes
SACOG ID
CAL18750 Various Counties Lead Agency Caltrans District 3
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
CAL18750 Various 06 SEP 2006
State Minor Funded Program
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 National Highway System Fund
$7,267,427 $7,267,427
2006 State Cash
$941,573 $941,573
$0
$0 $8,209,000 $8,209,000
Project Description
Lump Sum - State Minor Funded Program
(Non-Capacity Increasing Projects Only).
Previously programmed as CAL17370 in 2002 MTIP.
For complete project listing, see project file.
Federal Project
Total Cost $8,209,000
Exempt
Category:
Safety improvement program
124
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
CAL18763 Various Counties Lead Agency Caltrans District 3
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
CAL18763 2E150 06 FEB 2007
U.S. 50 Truck Climbing Lane Extension
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 National Highway System Fund
$764,013 $4,425 $3,625,303 $4,393,741
2006 State Cash
$98,987 $575 $469,697 $569,259
$863,000
$5,000 $4,095,000 $4,963,000
Project Description
In Sacramento & El Dorado Counties, on U.S. 50
from Scott Road to Latrobe Road, extend the existing
eastbound truck climbing lane by restriping the
mainline to 11-foot lanes and using shoulders.
Federal Project
Total Cost $4,963,000
SACOG ID
CAL18747 Various Counties Lead Agency Caltrans District 3
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
CAL18747 0A840 06 MAR 2007
U.S. 50 in West Sacramento - Rehabilitate Pavement
In West Sacramento - Route 80 to Sacramento
County Line; also in Sacramento County from Yolo
County Line to 65th Street - rehabilitate pavement
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 National Highway System Fund
$1,168,596 $1,168,596
2005 State Cash
$151,404 $151,404
2006 National Highway System Fund
$8,289,949 $8,289,949
2006 State Cash
$1,074,051 $1,074,051
$1,320,000
$0 $9,364,000 $10,684,000
Federal Project
Total Cost $10,684,000
Exempt
Category:
Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation
SACOG ID
VAR10060 Various Counties Lead Agency Caltrans Headquarters
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
VAR10060 n/a 06 2007
SACOG Area HES Program
Lump Sum - Local Hazard Elimination and Safety
projects, non-capacity increasing only
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 State Cash
$52,800 $52,800
2005 Surface Transportation Program Safety Fund
$475,200 $475,200
2006 Hazard Elimination and Safety Program
$338,000 $338,000
2006 State Cash
$37,556 $37,556
$0
$0
$903,556
$903,556
Federal Project
Total Cost $903,556
Exempt
Category:
Safety improvement program
125
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
VAR10050 Various Counties Lead Agency Caltrans Headquarters
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
VAR10050 n/a 06 2007
SACOG Area State Hwy Bridge Replacement
Lump Sum - Highway Bridge Replacement and
Rehabilitation projects, non-capacity increasing only
(includes seismic retrofit)
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
REG17710 Various Counties Lead Agency SACOG
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
REG17710 n/a 06 2009
Capitol Corridor Peak Period Enhancements
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2008 Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality
$250,000 $250,000
2008 Local Agency Funds
$22,450,000 $22,450,000
$0
$0 $22,700,000 $22,700,000
Project Description
Auburn to Dixon on UPRR ROW: Add two or three
new stations, make track and signal improvments
and acquire two train sets to increase Capitol Corridor
intercity rail service in peak periods to a total of 18
round trips daily.
Federal Project
Total Cost $22,700,000
SACOG ID
VAR10300 Various Counties Lead Agency SACOG
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
VAR10300 n/a 06 2007
Elk Grove-Rancho-El Dorado Connector
In Sacramento and El Dorado Counties: study a
multi-modal connector between Elk Grove, Rancho
Cordova and El Dorado Hills.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
VAR56002 Various Counties Lead Agency SACOG
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
VAR56002 n/a 06 2007
SACOG Blueprint Project
In the SACOG Region, develop a comprehensive
regional process that integrates land use and
transportation, air quality and other regional
concerns. The Blueprint project utilizes extensive
public outreach and modeling tools to estimate the
transportation, air quality, economic and other effects
of current land use patterns and develop alternatives
to those patterns.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
VAR56007 Various Counties Lead Agency SACOG
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
VAR56007 n/a 06 2009
Sacramento Clean Air Program
In the SACOG region. Carry out activities to increase
citizen engagement, educate officials and citizens,
and improve local planning review to foster
implementation of Blueprint development patterns that
promote air quality progress.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 Federal Demonstration Funds
$2,000,000 $2,000,000
2006 Local Agency Funds
$500,000 $500,000
2007 Federal Demonstration Funds
$1,000,000 $1,000,000
2007 Local Agency Funds
$250,000 $250,000
2008 Federal Demonstration Funds
$1,000,000 $1,000,000
2008 Local Agency Funds
$250,000 $250,000
>08
$1,250,000 $1,250,000
$6,250,000
$0
$0 $6,250,000
Federal Project
Total Cost $6,250,000
Exempt
Category:
Specific activities which do not involve or lead directly to construction, such as: planning and technical studies, grants for training
and research programs, planning activities conducted pursuant to titles 23 and 49 U.S.c., and Federal-aid systems revisions
SACOG ID
SAC20400 Various Counties Lead Agency SACOG
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC20400 n/a 06 2007
Sacramento Metropolitan Area Rideshare Program
Provide ride-matching services for the Sacramento
metropolitan area; cooperate with local agencies in
Highway 50 outreach effort; provide funding for 11
TMAs in region through grants. (TDM)
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
VAR56001 Various Counties Lead Agency SACOG
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
VAR56001 n/a 06 JUN 2007
State Implementation Plan for Air Quality - SACOG
Region
In SACOG region, perform modeling, control measure
evaluations, public outreach and environmental
documents for new SIP based on 8-hour ozone
requirements.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 Local Agency Funds
$1,000,000 $1,000,000
$1,000,000
$0
$0 $1,000,000
Other
Total Cost $1,000,000
Exempt
Category:
Specific activities which do not involve or lead directly to construction, such as: planning and technical studies, grants for training
and research programs, planning activities conducted pursuant to titles 23 and 49 U.S.c., and Federal-aid systems revisions
SACOG ID
VAR56006 Various Counties Lead Agency Sac. Metro Air Quality Management District
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Last Revised
Completion Year
VAR56006 n/a 06 DEC 2008
Spare The Air
EA Number
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality
$1,200,000 $1,200,000
2006 Local Agency Funds
$155,473 $155,473
$1,355,473
$0
$0 $1,355,473
Project Description
Spare The Air Voluntary Driving Curtailment Program.
[Continued from SAC21080]
Federal Project
Total Cost $1,355,473
Exempt
Category:
Specific activities which do not involve or lead directly to construction, such as: planning and technical studies, grants for training
and research programs, planning activities conducted pursuant to titles 23 and 49 U.S.c., and Federal-aid systems revisions
SACOG ID
VAR56005 Various Counties Lead Agency Sac. Metro Air Quality Management District
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
VAR56005 n/a 06 DEC 2008
State Implementation Plan (SIP) Development
Program
The SIP Development Program will allow the region to
develop a comprehensive air quality plan for meeting
the 8-hour national ambient air quality standard
(NAAQS) by June 15, 2013.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality
$625,000 $625,000
2006 Local Agency Funds
$80,975 $80,975
$705,975
$0
$0
$705,975
Federal Project
Total Cost $705,975
Exempt
Category:
Specific activities which do not involve or lead directly to construction, such as: planning and technical studies, grants for training
and research programs, planning activities conducted pursuant to titles 23 and 49 U.S.c., and Federal-aid systems revisions
130
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
VAR56004 Various Counties Lead Agency Sac. Metro Air Quality Management District
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
VAR56004 n/a 06 DEC 2008
Urban Forest for Clean Air (Phases 1-3)
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality
$641,842 $641,842
2006 Local Agency Funds
$83,158 $83,158
$725,000
$0
$0
$725,000
Project Description
To evaluate the potential of SIP control strategy to
capture the effects of the urban forest on regional air
quality today and in the future.
Federal Project
Total Cost $725,000
Exempt
Category:
Specific activities which do not involve or lead directly to construction, such as: planning and technical studies, grants for training
and research programs, planning activities conducted pursuant to titles 23 and 49 U.S.c., and Federal-aid systems revisions
SACOG ID
YST10418 Various Counties Lead Agency Yuba Sutter Transit
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
YST10418 n/a 06 2008
Commuter Bus Purchase
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2008 Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality
$750,000 $750,000
2008 Local Agency Funds
$100,000 $100,000
$0
$0
$850,000
$850,000
Project Description
Purchase three commuter buses for fleet replacement
and minor fleet expansion
Federal Project
Total Cost $850,000
Exempt
Category:
Purchase of new buses and rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for minor expansions of the fleet
SACOG ID
YST10190 Various Counties Lead Agency Yuba Sutter Transit
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
YST10190 n/a 06 2008
Demand Response Vehicle Replacement
Purchase ten demand response/rural route vehicles
for fleet replacement
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2007 FTA 5307
$380,000 $380,000
2007 FTA 5311
$100,000 $100,000
2007 Transportation Development Act
$120,000 $120,000
$0
$0
$600,000
$600,000
Federal Project
Total Cost $600,000
Exempt
Category:
Purchase of new buses and rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for minor expansions of the fleet
131
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
YST10170 Various Counties Lead Agency Yuba Sutter Transit
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
YST10170 n/a 06 SEP 2007
Fixed Route Fleet Replacement
Purchase eight replacement and two expansion fixed
route buses for fleet.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 FTA 5307
$895,388 $895,388
2006 Transportation Development Act
$329,107 $329,107
2007 Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality
$1,443,227 $1,443,227
2007 Local Agency Funds
$82,278 $82,278
$0
$0 $2,750,000 $2,750,000
Federal Project
Total Cost $2,750,000
Exempt
Category:
Purchase of new buses and rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for minor expansions of the fleet
SACOG ID
YST10412 Various Counties Lead Agency Yuba Sutter Transit
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
YST10412 n/a 06 2006
Operating Assistance FY 2006
Yuba-Sutter Transit Operating Assistance for 2006
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 FTA 3037
$170,705 $170,705
2006 FTA 5307
$550,000 $550,000
2006 FTA 5311
$150,000 $150,000
2006 Local Agency Funds
$2,770,000 $2,770,000
$0
$0 $3,640,705 $3,640,705
Federal Project
Total Cost $3,640,705
Exempt
Category:
Operating assistance to transit agencies
SACOG ID
YST10416 Various Counties Lead Agency Yuba Sutter Transit
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
YST10416 n/a 06 JUN 2007
Operating Assistance for FY 2007
Operating Assistance for FY 2007
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 FTA 3037
$170,705 $170,705
2007 FTA 5307
$800,000 $800,000
2007 FTA 5311
$160,000 $160,000
2007 Local Agency Funds
$2,705,000 $2,705,000
$0
$0 $3,835,705 $3,835,705
Federal Project
Total Cost $3,835,705
Exempt
Category:
Operating assistance to transit agencies
132
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
YST10419 Various Counties Lead Agency Yuba Sutter Transit
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
YST10419 n/a 06 JUN 2008
Operating Assistance for FY 2008
Operating Assistance for FY 2008
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2008 FTA 3037
$150,000 $150,000
2008 FTA 5307
$800,000 $800,000
2008 FTA 5311
$170,000 $170,000
2008 Local Agency Funds
$3,080,000 $3,080,000
$0
$0 $4,200,000 $4,200,000
Federal Project
Total Cost $4,200,000
Exempt
Category:
Operating assistance to transit agencies
SACOG ID
CAL18751 Yolo County Lead Agency Caltrans District 3
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
Last Revised
Completion Year
CAL18751 0E860 06 FEB 2007
I-80 Tree Planting
EA Number
In Yolo County, on Interstate 80, from 3.7 miles east
of Davis to the Sacramento County Line: Tree
Planting.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 State Cash
$13,000 $13,000
2005 State Transportation Enhancement Activities
$87,000 $87,000
2006 State Cash
$1,300 $77,800 $79,100
2006 State Transportation Enhancement Activities
$8,700 $522,200 $530,900
$100,000
$10,000
$600,000
$710,000
Federal Project
Total Cost $710,000
Exempt
Category:
Plantings, landscaping, etc.
SACOG ID
CAL18743 Yolo County Lead Agency Caltrans District 3
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
CAL18743 0C470 06 OCT 2010
SR-16 Widen Shoulder and Other Improvements
Near Brooks - east of Mossy Creek Bridge to west of
Route 505 - widen shoulder and construct left turn
lane and right turn pockets
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2007 State Cash
$1,753,419 $1,753,419
2007 State Surface Transportation Program
$13,533,581 $13,533,581
2008 State Cash
$825,840 $3,670,400 $4,496,240
2008 State Surface Transportation Program
$6,374,160 $28,329,600 $34,703,760
$15,287,000 $7,200,000 $32,000,000 $54,487,000
Federal Project
Total Cost $54,487,000
Exempt
Category:
Shoulder Improvements
133
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
YOL15880 Yolo County Lead Agency Caltrans District 3
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
YOL15880 388000 06 2010
US 50 Harbor Boulevard Interchange
In West Sacramento, US 50, Harbor Blvd
Interchange: widen to 6 lanes,revise ramps and add
auxiliary lanes.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
08
$23,500,000 $23,500,000
$3,700,000 $8,370,000 $23,500,000 $35,570,000
Federal Project
Total Cost $35,570,000
SACOG ID
YOL19210 Yolo County Lead Agency City of Davis Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
YOL19210 n/a 06 SEP 2009
Downtown Multimodal Parking Structure
In Davis, construct multistory parking structure to
serve multimodal transportation center (Amtrak,
Unitrans, Davis Community Transit, commercial
shuttles and bike/ped) and the downtown Davis
business district (ENVIRONMENTAL & P.E. ONLY).
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
08
$1,500,000 $1,500,000
$2,295,000
$0
$0 $2,295,000
Federal Project
Total Cost $2,295,000
Exempt
Category:
Bus terminals and transfer points
134
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
YOL19211 Yolo County Lead Agency City of West Sacramento Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
YOL19211 n/a 06 DEC 2008
Tower Bridge Gateway/Garden Street Intersection
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 Local Agency Funds
$2,030,000 $2,030,000
2006 Regional Surface Transportation Program
$2,970,000 $2,970,000
$0
$0 $5,000,000 $5,000,000
Project Description
In West Sacramento, Tower Bridge (former Highway
275) at Garden Street: lower existing roadway to
become an at-grade boulevard at the Tower Bridge
Gateway.
Federal Project
Total Cost $5,000,000
Exempt
Category:
Transportation enhancement activities (except rehabilitation and operation of historic transportation buildings, structures or facilities)
SACOG ID
YOL17300 Yolo County Lead Agency City of Woodland Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
YOL17300 n/a 06 2008
I-5 / CR 102 Interchange
Reconstruct interchange on I-5 at County Road 102
including overcrossing of I-5.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
08
$90,000,000 $90,000,000
$250,000
$0 $90,000,000 $90,250,000
Project Description
Rail transit from Downtown Sacramento to West
Sacramento.
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $90,250,000
135
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
VAR19214 Yolo County Lead Agency U.S. Department of Fish and Game
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
VAR19214 n/a 06 2011
Mace Bird Reserve Access Road
Construct two-lane road from Mace Blvd. to federally
supported Pacific Flyway wildlife area. HPP #867
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2007 Federal Demonstration Funds
$200,000 $200,000
2007 Local Agency Funds
$30,000 $30,000
>08
$230,000 $700,000 $930,000
$230,000
$230,000
$700,000 $1,160,000
Federal Project
Total Cost $1,160,000
SACOG ID
UNI10331 Yolo County Lead Agency University Transport System
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
UNI10331 n/a 06 2012
UCD Hydrogen Bus Project
In Davis, Unitrans: implement UC Davis Hydrogen
Bus Technology Validation Project Phases 3 and 4
(Phases 1 & 2 included in UNI10330); later phases
include enhancements and support for two HCNG
converted buses and additional HCNG conversions.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
UNI10440 Yolo County Lead Agency University Transport System
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
UNI10440 n/a 06 2007
Unitrans Capital Assistance
Unitrans bus stop improvements, accessibility, and
passenger amenities
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
UNI10360 Yolo County Lead Agency University Transport System
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
UNI10360 n/a 06 2007
Unitrans Capital Assistance
Upgraded bus transit center at UC Davis (Hutchison
Corridor), including off-street berths, shelter,
landscaping, bike racks, and signage, with no land
acquisition or roadway capacity increase.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
UNI10442 Yolo County Lead Agency University Transport System
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
UNI10442 n/a 06 2007
Unitrans Maintenance Facility Improvements
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 FTA 5307
$134,400 $134,400
2006 Local Agency Funds
$33,600 $33,600
$0
$0
$168,000
$168,000
Project Description
Facility improvements at existing Unitrans
Maintenance Facility, with no increase in size or
capacilty.
Federal Project
Total Cost $168,000
SACOG ID
UNI10320 Yolo County Lead Agency University Transport System
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
UNI10320 n/a 06 2007
Unitrans Operating Assistance
In Davis, operating Assistance for Unitrans.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
YCT18076 Yolo County Lead Agency Yolo County Transportation District
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
YCT18076 n/a 06 JUN 2007
ADA paratransit operations
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 FTA 5307
$150,000 $150,000
2006 Local Transportation Fund
$37,500 $37,500
$0
$0
$187,500
$187,500
Project Description
Operating assistance for ADA paratransit service
Federal Project
Total Cost $187,500
Exempt
Category:
Operating assistance to transit agencies
SACOG ID
YCT18078 Yolo County Lead Agency Yolo County Transportation District
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Last Revised
Completion Year
YCT18078 n/a 06 JUN 2007
ADAvehicles
EA Number
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 FTA 5307
$68,000 $68,000
2006 Local Transportation Fund
$17,000 $17,000
$0
$0
$85,000
$85,000
Project Description
Purchase revenue vehicles for ADA paratransit
service
Federal Project
Total Cost $85,000
Exempt
Category:
Purchase of new buses and rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for minor expansions of the fleet
SACOG ID
YCT18079 Yolo County Lead Agency Yolo County Transportation District
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Last Revised
Completion Year
YCT18079 n/a 06 JUN 2007
Facility Equipment
EA Number
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 FTA 5307
$10,000 $10,000
2006 Local Transportation Fund
$2,500 $2,500
$0
$0
$12,500
$12,500
Project Description
Purchase equipment for maintenance facility
Federal Project
Total Cost $12,500
Exempt
Category:
Purchase of office, shop, and operating equipment for existing facilities
140
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
YCT18086 Yolo County Lead Agency Yolo County Transportation District
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
YCT18086 n/a 06 OCT 2008
Free transit fares for “Spare the Air” days
Provide free fares during “Spare the Air” smog days in
the Sacramento region for two years (up to 30
events).
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2008 Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality
$30,835 $30,835
2008 Local Agency Funds
$3,995 $3,995
>08
$35,875 $35,875
$0
$0
$70,705
$70,705
Federal Project
Total Cost $70,705
Exempt
Category:
Specific activities which do not involve or lead directly to construction, such as: planning and technical studies, grants for training
and research programs, planning activities conducted pursuant to titles 23 and 49 U.S.c., and Federal-aid systems revisions
SACOG ID
YCT18075 Yolo County Lead Agency Yolo County Transportation District
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
YCT18075 n/a 06 JUN 2007
Preventive Maintenance
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 FTA 5307
$913,000 $913,000
2006 Local Transportation Fund
$228,250 $228,250
$0
$0 $1,141,250 $1,141,250
Project Description
Yolobus fleet preventive maintenance
Federal Project
Total Cost $1,141,250
Exempt
Category:
Operating assistance to transit agencies
SACOG ID
YCT18081 Yolo County Lead Agency Yolo County Transportation District
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
YCT18081 n/a 06 JUN 2008
Preventive Maintenance
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2007 FTA 5307
$1,101,000 $1,101,000
2007 Local Transportation Fund
$275,250 $275,250
$0
$0 $1,376,250 $1,376,250
Project Description
Yolobus fleet preventive maintenance
Federal Project
Total Cost $1,376,250
Exempt
Category:
Operating assistance to transit agencies
141
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
YCT18087 Yolo County Lead Agency Yolo County Transportation District
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
YCT18087 n/a 06 JUL 2008
Purchase New Transit Vehicles
Replacement of thirteen (13) fully equipped buses
(including fareboxes, radios, surveillance and AVL
systems); one (1) fully equipped cutaway paratransit
vehicle; and, two (2) minivans.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2007 Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality
$4,789,473 $4,789,473
2007 Local Agency Funds
$620,527 $620,527
2008 Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality
$79,677 $79,677
2008 Local Agency Funds
$10,323 $10,323
$0
$0 $5,500,000 $5,500,000
Federal Project
Total Cost $5,500,000
Exempt
Category:
Purchase of new buses and rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for minor expansions of the fleet
SACOG ID
YCT18080 Yolo County Lead Agency Yolo County Transportation District
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
YCT18080 n/a 06 JUN 2007
Safety and Security
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 FTA 5307
$80,000 $80,000
2006 Local Transportation Fund
$20,000 $20,000
$0
$0
$100,000
$100,000
Project Description
Safety and security improvements for bus stops and
facilities
Federal Project
Total Cost $100,000
Exempt
Category:
Safety improvement program
SACOG ID
YCT18083 Yolo County Lead Agency Yolo County Transportation District
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Last Revised
Completion Year
YCT18083 n/a 06 JUN 2008
Transit planning
EA Number
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2007 FTA 5307
$70,000 $70,000
2007 Local Transportation Fund
$17,500 $17,500
$0
$0
$87,500
$87,500
Project Description
Transit service and operations planning and
development review
Federal Project
Total Cost $87,500
Exempt
Category:
Operating assistance to transit agencies
142
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
YCT18088 Yolo County Lead Agency Yolo County Transportation District
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
YCT18088 n/a 06 JUN 2007
YCTD Facility Improvements
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 FTA 5309 (c) - Bus
$384,560 $384,560
$0
$0
$384,560
$384,560
Project Description
5309 (earmarked) funds for the improvement of YCTD
facilities. Total multi-year project includes $1.6
million in federal funds.
Federal Project
Total Cost $384,560
Exempt
Category:
Reconstruction or renovation of transit buildings and structures (e.g., rail or bus buildings, storage and maintenance facilities,
stations, terminals, and ancillary structures)
SACOG ID
YCT18084 Yolo County Lead Agency Yolo County Transportation District
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
YCT18084 n/a 06 2007
YCTD Jobs Access & Reverse Commute Program
In Yolo County, provide JARC operations for Yolo
County Transportation District.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 FTA 3037
$361,525 $361,525
2005 Local Agency Funds
$361,525 $361,525
2006 FTA 3037
$196,223 $196,223
2006 Local Agency Funds
$196,223 $196,223
2007 FTA 3037
$196,223 $196,223
2007 Local Agency Funds
$196,223 $196,223
$0
$0 $1,507,942 $1,507,942
Federal Project
Total Cost $1,507,942
Exempt
Category:
Operating assistance to transit agencies
SACOG ID
YCT18063 Yolo County Lead Agency Yolo County Transportation District
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
YCT18063 n/a 06 JUN 2007
YCTD Rural formula operating assistance
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2007 FTA 5311
$316,730 $316,730
2007 Local Agency Funds
$578,894 $578,894
$0
$0
$895,624
$895,624
Project Description
Rural formula FTA Section 5311 operating assistance
Federal Project
Total Cost $895,624
Exempt
Category:
Operating assistance to transit agencies
143
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
YCT18065 Yolo County Lead Agency Yolo County Transportation District
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
YCT18065 n/a 06 JUN 2006
YCTD Spare the Air Project
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality
$31,145 $31,145
2006 Local Agency Funds
$4,035 $4,035
$0
$0
$35,180
$35,180
Project Description
Yolo County: Spare the Air project, free fares on
Yolobus on spare the air event days; Project YCT
11020, MTIP amendment 03-14.
Federal Project
Total Cost $35,180
Exempt
Category:
Continuation of ride-sharing and van-pooling promotion activities at current levels
SACOG ID
YCT18074 Yolo County Lead Agency Yolo County Transportation District
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
YCT18074 n/a 06 JUN 2007
Yolobus Administration and Maintenance Facility
Improvements
Improvements to the administration and maintenance
facility for Yolobus located in Woodland, including the
CNG fueling station
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2007 Local Transportation Fund
$625,000 $625,000
2008 FTA 5309 (c) - Bus
$2,500,000 $2,500,000
$0
$0 $3,125,000 $3,125,000
Federal Project
Total Cost $3,125,000
Exempt
Category:
Reconstruction or renovation of transit buildings and structures (e.g., rail or bus buildings, storage and maintenance facilities,
stations, terminals, and ancillary structures)
SACOG ID
YCT18077 Yolo County Lead Agency Yolo County Transportation District
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Last Revised
Completion Year
YCT18077 n/a 06 JUN 2007
transit planning
EA Number
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 FTA 5307
$68,000 $68,000
2006 Local Transportation Fund
$17,000 $17,000
$0
$0
$85,000
$85,000
Project Description
Transit service and operations planning and
development review
Federal Project
Total Cost $85,000
Exempt
Category:
Operating assistance to transit agencies
144
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
CAL18755 Yuba County Lead Agency Caltrans District 3
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
CAL18755 401801 06 DEC 2006
SR 65 Wheatland Signal / Left-Turn Lane
In Wheatland, SR 65, from Main Street to Hooper
Street, install traffic signal and lighting; construct
two-way left turn lane; and add curb, gutter, sidewalk,
and drainage.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
YUB15710 Yuba County Lead Agency City of Wheatland
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
YUB15710 n/a 06 2006
SR 65 Wheatland Signals
In Wheatland, SR 65, N. of 1st St. to S. of Main St.;
construct signals and pedestrian improvements.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
08
$3,000,000 $3,000,000
$400,000
$350,000 $3,000,000 $3,750,000
Federal Project
Total Cost $3,750,000
Exempt
Category:
Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation
SACOG ID
YUB15600 Yuba County Lead Agency Yuba County Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
YUB15600 n/a 06 OCT 2006
Honcut Road Bridge Replacement
In Yuba County, Community of Loma Rica, replace
Honcut Road Bridge over Honcut Creek.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
YUB15848 Yuba County Lead Agency Yuba County Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
YUB15848 n/a 06 OCT 2005
La Porte Road Pavement Rehabilitation
In Yuba County, Community of Brownsville, La Porte
Road from Willow Glen Road to Oregon Hill Road:
pavement rehabilitation.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 Local Agency Funds
$2,868 $2,868
2005 Regional Surface Transportation Program
$22,132 $22,132
2006 Local Agency Funds
$83,158 $83,158
2006 Regional Surface Transportation Program
$641,842 $641,842
$25,000
$0
$725,000
$750,000
Federal Project
Total Cost $750,000
Exempt
Category:
Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation
SACOG ID
YUB15849 Yuba County Lead Agency Yuba County Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
YUB15849 n/a 06 NOV 2007
New York Creek Bridge Replacement
In Yuba County, near Brownsville, La Porte Road at
New York Creek crossing: replace bridge.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
YUB15360 Yuba County Lead Agency Yuba County Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
YUB15360 n/a 06 2010
Route 70 at Feather River Blvd.
Phase 1 will be to construct a signalized intersection
at Feather River Blvd./SR 70. Phase 2 will be to
construct a new interchange at Feather River
Blvd./SR 70 in conjunction with the Plumas Lake
Specific Plan and the SR 70 widening.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 Developer Capital Investment
$500,000 $2,500,000 $3,000,000
2008 Developer Capital Investment
$2,000,000 $1,000,000 $3,000,000
>08
$12,000,000 $12,000,000
$2,500,000 $1,000,000 $14,500,000 $18,000,000
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $18,000,000
SACOG ID
YUB15580 Yuba County Lead Agency Yuba County Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
YUB15580 n/a 06 OCT 2009
SR 65 Interchange at Forty Mile Road
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2006 Developer Capital Investment
$70,000 $70,000
$70,000
$0
$0
$70,000
Project Description
South of Marysville, SR 65 at Forty Mile Road
Interchange: construct interchange to accommodate
traffic from the Yuba County Motorplex.
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $70,000
148
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
YUB15375 Yuba County Lead Agency Yuba County Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
YUB15375 2A2720 06 AUG 2007
SR 70 Algodon Road Interchange
South of Marysville - south of Algodon Road at SR 70
and Plumas Lake Road - construct bridge for new
interchange.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
VAR42000
Lead Agency
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
VAR42000 n/a n/a
Lump Sum of Pavement Rehabilitation
Various locations in SACOG Region, pavement
resurfacing and/or rehabilitation. Projects are
consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126, 127, 128,
Exempt Tables 2 & 3.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
VAR56000
Lead Agency
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
VAR56000 n/a n/a
Lump Sum Bridge Reconstruction
Various locations in SACOG Region, widening narrow
pavements or reconstructing bridges (no additional
travel lanes). Projects are consistent with 40 CFR
Part 93.126, 127, 128, Exempt Tables 2 & 3.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
VAR30000
Lead Agency
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
VAR30000 n/a n/a
Lump Sum for Bicycle/Pedestrian Projects
At various locations throughout the SACOG Region,
construct bicycle and pedestrian projects. Projects
are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126, 127, 128,
Exempt Tables 2 & 3.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
VAR74000
Lead Agency
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
VAR74000 n/a n/a
Lump Sum Railroad/Highway Crossing
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2007 Surface Transportation Program-Rail Xing Improvement Fund
$400,000 $400,000
$0
$0
$400,000
$400,000
Project Description
Various locations in SACOG Region, railroad/highway
crossings. Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part
93.126, 127, 128, Exempt Tables 2 & 3.
Exempt Railroad/highway crossing
2 Fed - 0 Reg Sig - 0 Oth
Total Cost $400,000
Category:
SACOG ID
VAR43000
Lead Agency
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
VAR43000 n/a n/a
Lump Sum of Plantings, Landscaping, etc.
Various locations in SACOG Region, implementation
of planting and landscaping projects. Projects are
consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126, 127, 128,
Exempt Tables 2 & 3.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
2006/08 MTIP -- Action Element
SACOG ID
VAR55000
Lead Agency
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
VAR55000 n/a n/a
Lump Sum Transportation Enhancements
Various locations in SACOG Region, transportation
enhancement activities. Projects are consistent with
40 CFR Part 93.126, 127, 128, Exempt Tables 2 & 3.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

SECTION 4
STATUS OF PROJECTS FROM PAST METROPOLITAN
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS,
INCLUDING THE 2005/07 MTIP
155

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
Projects from past MTIPs, Including 2005/07, That Have Been Implemented
SACOG ID
REG17020 Sacramento County Lead Agency Sacramento Regional Transit District
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
REG17020 n/a 06 2005
Metro Heavy Repair Facility
In Sacramento, deisgn and construct a new LRV
heavy repair facility at the existing RT Metro property.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
Projects from past MTIPs, Including 2005/07, That Have Been Implemented
SACOG ID
SUT10787 Sutter County Lead Agency Sutter County Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SUT10787 n/a 06 AUG 2005
Garden Highway Rehab
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 Regional Surface Transportation Program
$490,000 $490,000
2005 Road Fund
$67,000 $67,000
$0
$0
$557,000
$557,000
Project Description
Remove existing OG,lay leveling
course,fabric,overlay,OG, rebuild shoulders
Federal Project
Total Cost $557,000
Exempt
Category:
Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation
SACOG ID
SAC20410 Various Counties Lead Agency SACOG
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC20410 n/a 06 AUG 2007
SACOG Regional Programs
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 Local Agency Funds
$22,025 $22,025
2005 Regional Surface Transportation Program
$170,000 $170,000
$192,025
$0
$0
$192,025
Project Description
In SACOG Region, perform administrative work to
implement regional funding programs (community
design, air quality, transportation demand
management and bicycle/pedestrian).
Federal Project
Total Cost $192,025
Exempt
Category:
Specific activities which do not involve or lead directly to construction, such as: planning and technical studies, grants for training
and research programs, planning activities conducted pursuant to titles 23 and 49 U.S.c., and Federal-aid systems revisions
SACOG ID
SAC21080 Various Counties Lead Agency Sac. Metro Air Quality Management District
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC21080 n/a 06 2007
Spare the Air Program
Conduct the Spare the Air Education Program jointly
funded by the Sacramento Metro AQMD, Yolo-Solano
AQMD and the Placer County Air Quality Control
District. [Spare the Air continued in 2006 with new ID:
VAR56006]
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
Projects from past MTIPs, Including 2005/07, That Have Been Implemented
SACOG ID
CAL16370 Yolo County Lead Agency Caltrans District 3
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
CAL16370 2C8300 06 SEP 2006
SR 84 (Jefferson Blvd.) Relinquishment
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 State Cash
$6,199,000 $6,199,000
$0
$0 $6,199,000 $6,199,000
Project Description
In West Sacramento, from south West Sacramento
urban limits to I-80: relinquishment from Caltrans to
the City of West Sacramento.
Other
Total Cost $6,199,000
Exempt
Category:
Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation
SACOG ID
YOL16700 Yolo County Lead Agency City of West Sacramento Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
YOL16700 n/a 06 2005
Industrial Blvd. & Enterprise Blvd.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 Regional Surface Transportation Program
$360,700 $360,700
2005 Regional Surface Transportation Program
$45,150 $45,150
$45,150
$0
$360,700
$405,850
Project Description
In West Sacramento, Industrial Blvd. from Harbor
Blvd. to Enterprise Blvd. and Enterprise Blvd. from
Industrial Blvd. to Channel Drive: overlay and slurry
seal of existing pavement.
Federal Project
Total Cost $405,850
Exempt
Category:
Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation
SACOG ID
YOL17677 Yolo County Lead Agency City of West Sacramento Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
YOL17677 n/a 06 2005
Safe Route to School - Washington Unified School
District
Construction of sidewalks & curb ramps;
signing/striping/marking; and expansion of school
parking lot/student drop off areas.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 Local Agency Funds
$6,000 $41,000 $47,000
2005 Safe Routes to School
$54,000 $369,000 $423,000
$60,000
$0
$410,000
$470,000
Federal Project
Total Cost $470,000
Exempt
Category:
Safety improvement program
158
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
Projects from past MTIPs, Including 2005/07, That Have Been Implemented
SACOG ID
YOL16550 Yolo County Lead Agency City of Winters Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
YOL16550 928137 06 2005
Railroad and Grant Signal Improvements
In Winters, intersection of Grant Ave. (SR 128) and
Railroad Ave, widen and install traffic signal.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
Projects from past MTIPs, Including 2005/07, That Have Been Implemented
SACOG ID
SAC16092 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Sacramento Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC16092 n/a 06 2005
Richards Boulevard Widening
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
Projects from past MTIPs, Including 2005/07, That Have Been Implemented
SACOG ID
SAC20390 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Sacramento Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC20390 n/a 06 2005
Southern Pacific Depot Renovation
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
Projects from past MTIPs, Including 2005/07, That Have Been Implemented
SACOG ID
SAC15220 Sacramento County Lead Agency Sacramento County Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC15220 03-0L0144 06 2005
Elkhorn Boulevard Widening
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
Projects from past MTIPs, Including 2005/07, That Have Been Implemented
SACOG ID
PLA15500 Placer County Lead Agency City of Rocklin Division of Engineering
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Last Revised
Completion Year
PLA15500 n/a 06 2003
Pacific Street
EA Number
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
Projects from past MTIPs, Including 2005/07, That Have Been Implemented
SACOG ID
PLA19480 Placer County Lead Agency City of Rocklin Division of Engineering
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Last Revised
Completion Year
PLA19480 n/a 06 1999
State Route 65
EA Number
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
Projects from past MTIPs, Including 2005/07, That Have Been Implemented
SACOG ID
PLA15380 Placer County Lead Agency Placer County Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
PLA15380 n/a 06 2003
Sierra College Boulevard
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
Projects from past MTIPs, Including 2005/07, That Have Been Implemented
SACOG ID
CAL18380 Sacramento County Lead Agency Caltrans District 3
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
CAL18380 2A830 06 JUL 2005
I-80 Traffic Operations System
In Sacramento County, I-80 from Yolo Co. line to SR
244 Connector (Longview Dr.): install ramp metering,
traffic monitoring stations, HOV bypass lanes, CCTV
installation, message signs, and upgrade count
stations to TMS.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
Projects from past MTIPs, Including 2005/07, That Have Been Implemented
SACOG ID
SAC19250 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Sacramento Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC19250 453254 06 2005
CSUS Bike/Pedestrian Access Project
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
Projects from past MTIPs, Including 2005/07, That Have Been Implemented
SACOG ID
SAC22080 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Sacramento Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC22080 n/a 06 2005
Gateway Park Boulevard
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 Developer Capital Investment
$1,620,000 $1,620,000
2005 Developer Capital Investment
$180,000 $180,000
$180,000
$0 $1,620,000 $1,800,000
Project Description
Widen Gateway Park Blvd from Truxel Road to Arena
Blvd. from 2 to 4 lanes
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $1,800,000
SACOG ID
SAC20811 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Sacramento Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC20811 n/a 06 2008
Jed Smith
EA Number
Realign and extend Jed Smith as a 2-lane connection
between CSUS and Folsom Blvd.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 Local Agency Funds
$400,000 $400,000
2006 Local Agency Funds
$500,000 $500,000
2007 Local Agency Funds
$3,100,000 $3,100,000
$400,000
$500,000 $3,100,000 $4,000,000
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $4,000,000
SACOG ID
ELD16110 El Dorado County Lead Agency El Dorado County Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Last Revised
Completion Year
ELD16110 n/a 06 2005
Sophia Parkway
EA Number
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
Projects from past MTIPs, Including 2005/07, That Have Been Implemented
SACOG ID
ELD15630 El Dorado County Lead Agency El Dorado County Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
ELD15630 434100 06 2005
US 50 / El Dorado Hills Blvd. Interchange
Improvements
El Dorado Hills Blvd. Interchange Improvements.
Reconstruction of the interchange to increase
operational efficiency. Projects include; construct
WB loop off-ramp and WB on-ramp across from
Saratoga Way, reconstruct the EB on and off-ramps,
widen US 50 overcrossing, and widen El Dorado Hills
Blvd.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $0
SACOG ID
ELD15380 El Dorado County Lead Agency El Dorado County Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
Last Revised
Completion Year
ELD15380 n/a 06 SEP 2006
White Rock Road
EA Number
Upgrade 2-lane roadway to county standard and
extend to connect to Silva Valley Parkway from
Latrobe Road.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
Projects from past MTIPs, Including 2005/07, That Have Been Implemented
SACOG ID
PLA20275 Placer County Lead Agency City of Auburn Dept. of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
PLA20275 n/a 06 OCT 2004
Auburn Multimodal Center Landscaping
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
Projects from past MTIPs, Including 2005/07, That Have Been Implemented
SACOG ID
PLA19040 Placer County Lead Agency City of Lincoln Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
PLA19040 n/a 06 2002
Ferrari Ranch Road
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
Projects from past MTIPs, Including 2005/07, That Have Been Implemented
SACOG ID
PLA19771 Placer County Lead Agency City of Loomis Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
PLA19771 n/a 06 2003
Loomis Rail Station Improvements
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
Projects from past MTIPs, Including 2005/07, That Have Been Implemented
SACOG ID
ELD15020 El Dorado County Lead Agency El Dorado County Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
ELD15020 n/a 06 NOV 2005
Cameron Park Drive/Meder Road
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$550,000 $5,000 $585,000 $1,140,000
2005 Regional Surface Transportation Program Exchange
$102,000 $102,000
$550,000
$5,000
$687,000 $1,242,000
Project Description
In El Dorado County, Cameron Park Drive at Meder
Road: signalize intersection and construct related
improvements.
Federal Project
Total Cost $1,242,000
Exempt
Category:
Intersection signalization projects at individual intersections
SACOG ID
ELD19165 El Dorado County Lead Agency El Dorado County Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
ELD19165 n/a 06 NOV 2005
El Dorado Hills Blvd Interchange - Phase 1.2B
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$2,325,000 $2,325,000
2005 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$496,000 $496,000
$496,000
$0 $2,325,000 $2,821,000
Project Description
In El Dorado County, US 50 at El Dorado Hills
Boulevard. Interim improvements to the westbound
on and off ramps, and improvements to NB El Dorado
Hills Boulevard underneath Hwy 50. This project
would eliminate a safety hazard that occurs from
vehicles exiting at the westbound off-ramp backing up
and onto the US50 freeway.
This project is one piece of the overall interchange
project listed under ELD15630.
Other
Total Cost $2,821,000
Exempt
Category:
Safety improvement program
173
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
Projects from past MTIPs, Including 2005/07, That Have Been Implemented
SACOG ID
ELD16140 El Dorado County Lead Agency El Dorado County Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
ELD16140 n/a 06 2005
Green Valley Rd Bridge Replacement
In El Dorado County, Green Valley Road at Dry Creek
- Lotus Road: replace bridge over Dry Creek and
realign Lotus Road.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

SACOG ID
VAR55000
Lead Agency
Sacramento Area Council of Governments
Projects from past MTIPs, Including 2005/07, That Have Been Implemented
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
VAR55000 n/a n/a
Lump Sum Transportation Enhancements
Various locations in SACOG Region, transportation
enhancement activities. Projects are consistent with
40 CFR Part 93.126, 127, 128, Exempt Tables 2 & 3.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

SACOG ID
VAR30000
Lead Agency
Sacramento Area Council of Governments
Projects from past MTIPs, Including 2005/07, That Have Been Implemented
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
VAR30000 n/a n/a
Lump Sum for Bicycle/Pedestrian Projects
At various locations throughout the SACOG Region,
construct bicycle and pedestrian projects. Projects
are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126, 127, 128,
Exempt Tables 2 & 3.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
Projects from past MTIPs, Including 2005/07, That Have Been Implemented
SACOG ID
YCT11000 Yolo County Lead Agency Yolo County Transportation District
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
YCT11000 n/a 06 2005
YCTD Facility Improvements
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 FTA 5307
$856,944 $856,944
2005 Local Agency Funds
$214,236 $214,236
$0
$0 $1,071,180 $1,071,180
Project Description
Yolo County Transportation District: construct
improvements to maintenance/administration facility,
including equipment or facility improvements such as
office, communications, computer and counting room
equipment. Also, purchase equipment and
improvements for CNG fueling facility.
Federal Project
Total Cost $1,071,180
Exempt
Category:
Purchase of office, shop, and operating equipment for existing facilities
SACOG ID
VAR58000
Lead Agency
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
VAR58000 n/a n/a
Lump Sum Intersection Channelization
Various locations in SACOG Region, intersection
channelization. Projects are consistent with 40 CFR
Part 93.126, 127, 128, Exempt Tables 2 & 3.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
Projects from past MTIPs, Including 2005/07, That Have Been Implemented
SACOG ID
YCT10810 Yolo County Lead Agency Yolo County Transportation District
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
YCT10810 n/a 06 2005
YCTD Preventative Maintenance
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 FTA 5307
$1,150,000 $1,150,000
2005 Local Transportation Fund
$287,500 $287,500
$0
$0 $1,437,500 $1,437,500
Project Description
Yolo County Transportation District: perform
preventative maintenance on Yolobus fleet.
Federal Project
Total Cost $1,437,500
Exempt
Category:
Operating assistance to transit agencies
SACOG ID
YCT10800 Yolo County Lead Agency Yolo County Transportation District
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
YCT10800 n/a 06 2005
YCTD Transit Planning
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 FTA 5307
$168,096 $168,096
2005 Local Transportation Fund
$42,024 $42,024
$0
$0
$210,120
$210,120
Project Description
Yolo County Transportation District: perform service
planning and development review for Yolobus.
Federal Project
Total Cost $210,120
178
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
Projects from past MTIPs, Including 2005/07, That Have Been Removed
SACOG ID
ELD15050 El Dorado County Lead Agency El Dorado County Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
ELD15050 n/a 06 2007
Cameron Park Drive Widening
Widen Cameron Park Dr from Palmer Dr to Meder Rd
from 2 to 4 lanes (Phase 1). [DELETE - duplicate of
ELD15930]
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 Local Agency Funds
$1,200,000 $1,200,000
2006 Local Agency Funds
$6,000,000 $6,000,000
2007 Local Agency Funds
$7,135,000 $7,135,000
$1,200,000 $6,000,000 $7,135,000 $14,335,000
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $14,335,000
SACOG ID
ELD15220 El Dorado County Lead Agency El Dorado County Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Last Revised
Completion Year
ELD15220 n/a 06 SEP 2004
Latrobe Road
EA Number
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
Projects from past MTIPs, Including 2005/07, That Have Been Removed
SACOG ID
PLA19320 Placer County Lead Agency City of Rocklin Division of Engineering
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
Last Revised
Completion Year
PLA19320 n/a 06 2010
Park Drive
EA Number
Widen from 4 to 6 lanes from Roseville City Limits to
Sunset Blvd.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2007 Developer Capital Investment
$150,000 $150,000
2008 Developer Capital Investment
$200,000 $200,000
>08
$650,000 $650,000
$150,000
$200,000
$650,000 $1,000,000
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $1,000,000
SACOG ID
PLA17900 Placer County Lead Agency City of Rocklin Division of Engineering
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
PLA17900 n/a 06 2010
Sunset Boulevard @ UPRR overcrossing
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
Project Description
Widen from 4 to 6 lanes over the SPRR tracks.
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $0
SACOG ID
PLA19410 Placer County Lead Agency City of Rocklin Division of Engineering
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
PLA19410 n/a 06 2005
West Oaks Boulevard
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
Project Description
Widen from 2 to 4 lanes from Sunset Blvd to Lonetree
Boulevard.
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $0
180
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
Projects from past MTIPs, Including 2005/07, That Have Been Removed
SACOG ID
PLA25121 Placer County Lead Agency Placer County Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
PLA25121 n/a 06 NOV 2006
Highway 49 Streetscape Project
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
Project Description
North of Auburn, SR 49: plant trees, shrubs and
groundcover in five landscaped medians along
Highway 49 just north of Auburn. [DELETED the
scope of work and most of the funding are already
included in the CAL16470 listing]
Other
Total Cost $0
Exempt
Category:
Plantings, landscaping, etc.
SACOG ID
SAC18360 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Sacramento Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC18360 n/a 06 2006
7th St.
EA Number
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
Projects from past MTIPs, Including 2005/07, That Have Been Removed
SACOG ID
SAC21390 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Sacramento Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC21390 n/a 06 2005
Central City Two-way Conversion
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
Projects from past MTIPs, Including 2005/07, That Have Been Removed
SACOG ID
SAC22650 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Sacramento Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC22650 n/a 06 2006
Sutterville Rd/23rd to 24th Realignment
In Sacramento, 23rd St./Sutterville Bypass at 24th
St: realign streets to connect across Sutterville Road
and install new traffic signal.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
08
$3,000,000 $3,000,000
$595,000
$0 $3,000,000 $3,595,000
Project Description
In Sacramento County, Fair Oaks Boulevard from
Sunset Avenue to Madison Avenue: widen from 2 to 4
lanes.
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $3,595,000
183
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
Projects from past MTIPs, Including 2005/07, That Are In Progress
SACOG ID
YUB15690 Yuba County Lead Agency City of Marysville Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
YUB15690 0L0704 06 2006
2002 Pavement Rehabilitation Project Phase 1
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 Local Agency Funds
$97,819 $97,819
2005 Regional Surface Transportation Program
$755,000 $755,000
$0
$0
$852,819
$852,819
Project Description
In Marysville, various roads, Phase 1 pavement
rehabilitation.
Federal Project
Total Cost $852,819
Exempt
Category:
Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation
SACOG ID
YUB15760 Yuba County Lead Agency City of Marysville Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
YUB15760 n/a 06 2005
City of Marysville Pavement Rehab.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 Local Agency Funds
$42,248 $42,248
2005 Regional Surface Transportation Program
$280,000 $280,000
$0
$0
$322,248
$322,248
Project Description
In Marysville, various streets: rehabilitate existing
pavement.
Federal Project
Total Cost $322,248
Exempt
Category:
Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation
SACOG ID
YUB15730 Yuba County Lead Agency Yuba County Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
YUB15730 0L0184 06 NOV 2007
Loma Rica Road Pavement Rehabilitation
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
Projects from past MTIPs, Including 2005/07, That Are In Progress
SACOG ID
YUB15720 Yuba County Lead Agency Yuba County Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
YUB15720 0L0224 06 OCT 2005
North Beale Road Pavement Rehabilitation
In Yuba County, Community of Linda, North Beale
Road from Shad Road to Griffith Avenue, rehabilitate
pavement
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
Projects from past MTIPs, Including 2005/07, That Are In Progress
SACOG ID
YOL17610 Yolo County Lead Agency Yolo County Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
YOL17610 n/a 06 2004
Yolo County Road Rehabilitation
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 Local Agency Funds
$5,182 $46,395 $51,577
2005 Regional Surface Transportation Program
$40,000 $358,092 $398,092
$45,182
$0
$404,487
$449,669
Project Description
In Yolo County, County Road 102 between CR 17 and
CR 18C: rehabilitate roadway.
Federal Project
Total Cost $449,669
Exempt
Category:
Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation
SACOG ID
YOL16430 Yolo County Lead Agency City of Davis Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
YOL16430 n/a 06 2004
H and F Streets Bicycle/Pedestrian Path
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
Projects from past MTIPs, Including 2005/07, That Are In Progress
SACOG ID
YCT18070 Yolo County Lead Agency Yolo County Transportation District
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Last Revised
Completion Year
YCT18070 n/a 06 JUN 2006
ADA vehicles
EA Number
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 FTA 5307
$128,000 $128,000
2005 Local Transportation Fund
$32,000 $32,000
$0
$0
$160,000
$160,000
Project Description
Purchase revenue vehicles for ADA service
Federal Project
Total Cost $160,000
Exempt
Category:
Purchase of new buses and rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for minor expansions of the fleet
SACOG ID
YOL16400 Yolo County Lead Agency City of Davis Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
YOL16400 n/a 06 SEP 2006
Hutchison Drive Bike Lanes & Old Davis Road
Landscaping
UC Davis Campus, Hutchison Drive, CR 98 - SR 113:
widen to accommodate bike lanes; Old Davis Road,
from I-80 to California Avenue: add sustainable
landscaping and water-conserving irrigation.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 Local Agency Funds
$34,200 $136,800 $171,000
2005 State Transportation Enhancement Activities $250,600 $1,002,400 $1,253,000
$284,800
$0 $1,139,200 $1,424,000
Federal Project
Total Cost $1,424,000
Exempt
Category:
Bicycle and pedestrian facilities
SACOG ID
YCT18072 Yolo County Lead Agency Yolo County Transportation District
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
YCT18072 n/a 06 JUN 2006
Bus stop improvements
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 FTA 5307
$65,000 $65,000
2005 Local Transportation Fund
$16,250 $16,250
$0
$0
$81,250
$81,250
Project Description
Improvements to various bus stops in Yolobus
system
Federal Project
Total Cost $81,250
Exempt
Category:
Construction of small passenger shelters and information kiosks
187
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
Projects from past MTIPs, Including 2005/07, That Are In Progress
SACOG ID
YCT18071 Yolo County Lead Agency Yolo County Transportation District
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Last Revised
Completion Year
YCT18071 n/a 06 JUN 2006
Office equipment
EA Number
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 FTA 5307
$92,000 $92,000
2005 Local Transportation Fund
$23,000 $23,000
$0
$0
$115,000
$115,000
Project Description
Purchase office equipment including computers,
printers, copier
Federal Project
Total Cost $115,000
Exempt
Category:
Purchase of office, shop, and operating equipment for existing facilities
SACOG ID
YOL16440 Yolo County Lead Agency City of Davis Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Last Revised
Completion Year
YOL16440 n/a 06 2004
UC Davis Campus
EA Number
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
Projects from past MTIPs, Including 2005/07, That Are In Progress
SACOG ID
YOL17590 Yolo County Lead Agency City of Woodland Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
YOL17590 n/a 06 2006
Gibson Rd, Cottonwood and Third Streets
In Woodland, Gibson Road from East Street to Leo
Way; Cottonwood Street from Woodland Ave. to
Kentucky Ave.; Third Street from Court St. to Beamer
St.; East Street from Gibson Road to Road 24A;
Main Street from 3rd Street to 4th Street; rehabilitate
pavement.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
Projects from past MTIPs, Including 2005/07, That Are In Progress
SACOG ID
YCT18067 Yolo County Lead Agency Yolo County Transportation District
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
YCT18067 n/a 06 JUN 2006
Road supervisors' vehicles
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 FTA 5307
$60,000 $60,000
2005 Local Transportation Fund
$15,000 $15,000
$0
$0
$75,000
$75,000
Project Description
Purchase non-revenue vehicles for road supervisors
Federal Project
Total Cost $75,000
Exempt
Category:
Purchase of support vehicles
SACOG ID
YCT18073 Yolo County Lead Agency Yolo County Transportation District
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
YCT18073 n/a 06 JUN 2006
Safety and Security
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 FTA 5307
$60,000 $60,000
2005 Local Transportation Fund
$15,000 $15,000
$0
$0
$75,000
$75,000
Project Description
Safety and security improvements to bus stops and
facilities
Federal Project
Total Cost $75,000
Exempt
Category:
Safety improvement program
SACOG ID
YOL19212 Yolo County Lead Agency Yolo County Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
YOL19212 n/a 06 JUN 2007
Growing Space: Updating the General Plan to
Support Smart Growth in Rural Communities
In Yolo County, perform circulation planning activities
to integrate smart growth principles into the Yolo
County General Plan, and foster higher density
mixed-use development with pedestrian and
bicycle-oriented neighborhoods in rural small towns,
to reduce future vehicle demand and protect valuable
agricultural and habitat resources.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 Local Agency Funds
$553,296 $553,296
2005 Regional Surface Transportation Program
$218,790 $218,790
$772,086
$0
$0
$772,086
Federal Project
Total Cost $772,086
Exempt
Category:
Specific activities which do not involve or lead directly to construction, such as: planning and technical studies, grants for training
and research programs, planning activities conducted pursuant to titles 23 and 49 U.S.c., and Federal-aid systems revisions
190
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
Projects from past MTIPs, Including 2005/07, That Are In Progress
SACOG ID
YCT18069 Yolo County Lead Agency Yolo County Transportation District
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Last Revised
Completion Year
YCT18069 n/a 06 JUN 2006
Transit planning
EA Number
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 FTA 5307
$65,000 $65,000
2005 Local Transportation Fund
$16,250 $16,250
$0
$0
$81,250
$81,250
Project Description
Transit service and operations planning and
development review
Federal Project
Total Cost $81,250
Exempt
Category:
Operating assistance to transit agencies
SACOG ID
ELD16170 El Dorado County Lead Agency El Dorado County Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
ELD16170 n/a 06 2006
Mt. Murphy Road at the American River
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005
2005
$160,000 $160,000
Highway Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation Program
Local Agency Funds
$40,000 $40,000
$200,000
$0
$0
$200,000
Project Description
In El Dorado County, Mt. Murphy Road at the South
Fork of the American River: route study to repair or
replace existing bridge.
Federal Project
Total Cost $200,000
Exempt
Category:
Specific activities which do not involve or lead directly to construction, such as: planning and technical studies, grants for training
and research programs, planning activities conducted pursuant to titles 23 and 49 U.S.c., and Federal-aid systems revisions
SACOG ID
ELD10100 El Dorado County Lead Agency El Dorado County Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
ELD10100 n/a 06 2006
White Rock Road Realignment
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
Projects from past MTIPs, Including 2005/07, That Are In Progress
SACOG ID
ELD15920 El Dorado County Lead Agency El Dorado County Parks and Recreation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
ELD15920 n/a 06 2007
Coloma-Lotus Link Trail
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
Projects from past MTIPs, Including 2005/07, That Are In Progress
SACOG ID
ELD19167 El Dorado County Lead Agency El Dorado County Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
ELD19167 n/a 06 2006
Green Valley Road/Silva Valley Parkway Intersection
Signalization
Intersection improvements on Green Valley Road at
the Intersection of Silva Valley Parkway and
Allegheny Road. Widen Green Valley Road to add
left-turn pockets westbound to Silva Valley Parkway
and eastbound to Allegheny Road, and a right-turn
pockets eastbound to Silva Valley Parkway. Widen
Silva Valley Road northbound approaching Green
Valley Road to add a left-turn pocket. Installation of
traffic signals. Miscellaneous paving, drainage,
striping and signing improvements necessary to
accommodate the widening and signals as proposed.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$283,000 $283,000
2005 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$662,000 $662,000
2005 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$1,300,000 $1,300,000
$662,000
$283,000 $1,300,000 $2,245,000
Other
Total Cost $2,245,000
Exempt
Category:
Intersection signalization projects at individual intersections
SACOG ID
ELD15650 El Dorado County Lead Agency El Dorado County Transit
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
ELD15650 n/a 06 2007
Commuter Bus Acquisition
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 FTA 5307
$320,000 $320,000
$0
$0
$320,000
$320,000
Project Description
El Dorado Transit - Purchase Replacement and New
Service commuter buses
Federal Project
Total Cost $320,000
Exempt
Category:
Purchase of new buses and rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for minor expansions of the fleet
193
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
Projects from past MTIPs, Including 2005/07, That Are In Progress
SACOG ID
ELD15740 El Dorado County Lead Agency El Dorado County Transit
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Last Revised
Completion Year
ELD15740 n/a 06 2007
Diamond Springs
EA Number
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 Local Agency Funds
$20,265 $396,348 $416,613
2005 Transportation Development Act
$2,625 $52,722 $55,347
$22,890
$0
$449,070
$471,960
Project Description
Construction of Central Park and Ride Facility.
Other
Total Cost $471,960
Exempt
Category:
Bus terminals and transfer points
SACOG ID
ELD15800 El Dorado County Lead Agency El Dorado Hills Community Services District
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
ELD15800 n/a 06 2006
Harvard Way Trail Extension
Extend class 1 non-motorized Harvard Way Trail
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
Projects from past MTIPs, Including 2005/07, That Are In Progress
SACOG ID
PLA20110 Placer County Lead Agency City of Colfax Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
PLA20110 n/a 06 2006
Downtown Colfax Streetscape Improvements
In Colfax, Business Route 174 (Main St.) at Depot:
construct streetscaping improvements, landscaping,
lighting and signage, related to the multimodal
station.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
Projects from past MTIPs, Including 2005/07, That Are In Progress
SACOG ID
ELD15980 El Dorado County Lead Agency El Dorado County Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Last Revised
Completion Year
ELD15980 n/a 06 2006
Latrobe Road
EA Number
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
Projects from past MTIPs, Including 2005/07, That Are In Progress
SACOG ID
PLA17790 Placer County Lead Agency City of Rocklin Division of Engineering
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
PLA17790 n/a 06 2006
Rocklin Intercity Rail Station At-Grade Crossing
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
Projects from past MTIPs, Including 2005/07, That Are In Progress
SACOG ID
PCT10410 Placer County Lead Agency City of Roseville Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
PCT10410 n/a 06 2007
Roseville Transit Expansion Buses
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 FTA 5307
$432,000 $432,000
2005 Local Agency Funds
$87,000 $87,000
$0
$0
$519,000
$519,000
Project Description
Roseville Transit: purchase 3 expansion fixed route
buses.
Federal Project
Total Cost $519,000
SACOG ID
PLA25026 Placer County Lead Agency Placer County Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
PLA25026 n/a 06 SEP 2006
Fleet Air Quality Upgrade
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality
$935,440 $935,440
2005 Local Agency Funds
$127,560 $127,560
$0
$0 $1,063,000 $1,063,000
Project Description
DPW Fleet Air Quality Upgrade - Replace 11 diesel
powered vehicles used for road maintenance activities
in the unincorporated area of Placer County.
Federal Project
Total Cost $1,063,000
Exempt
Category:
Purchase of new buses and rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for minor expansions of the fleet
SACOG ID
PLA15220 Placer County Lead Agency Placer County Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
PLA15220 n/a 06 2007
Foothills Boulevard
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
Projects from past MTIPs, Including 2005/07, That Are In Progress
SACOG ID
PLA20535 Placer County Lead Agency Placer County Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
PLA20535 n/a 06 DEC 2005
Placer County Urban Overlays
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 Regional Surface Transportation Program
$601,841 $601,841
2005 Road Fund
$82,053 $82,053
$0
$0
$683,894
$683,894
Project Description
In Placer County, various roadways in the urbanized
areas of the county: perform road overlays
Federal Project
Total Cost $683,894
Exempt
Category:
Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation
SACOG ID
PLA15320 Placer County Lead Agency Placer County Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Last Revised
Completion Year
PLA15320 n/a 06 2006
Professional Drive
EA Number
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
Projects from past MTIPs, Including 2005/07, That Are In Progress
SACOG ID
PLA15420 Placer County Lead Agency Placer County Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Last Revised
Completion Year
PLA15420 n/a 06 2005
Walerga Road
EA Number
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
Projects from past MTIPs, Including 2005/07, That Are In Progress
SACOG ID
PCT10471 Placer County Lead Agency Placer County Transit
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
PCT10471 n/a 06 JUN 2004
Placer County - Transit Operating Assistance FY
03/04
Operation of transit services in non-urbanized areas of
Placer County
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
Projects from past MTIPs, Including 2005/07, That Are In Progress
SACOG ID
PLA20120 Placer County Lead Agency Placer County Transportation Planning Agency
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Last Revised
Completion Year
PLA20120 n/a 06 2006
Cisco Grove
EA Number
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
Projects from past MTIPs, Including 2005/07, That Are In Progress
SACOG ID
PLA20100 Placer County Lead Agency Placer County Transportation Planning Agency
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
PLA20100 n/a 06 2006
Robinson Flat near Foresthill
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
Projects from past MTIPs, Including 2005/07, That Are In Progress
SACOG ID
SAC15030 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Citrus Heights
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC15030 n/a 06 2009
Antelope Road Widening
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
Projects from past MTIPs, Including 2005/07, That Are In Progress
SACOG ID
SAC24071 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Elk Grove
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC24071 n/a 06 2006
Elk Grove ITS Phase 1A
In Elk Grove, replacement of 19 traffic signal
controllers on Laguna Blvd and Elk Grove Blvd.
between Harbour Point and Bruceville, 2 controllers
on Bruceville between Laguna and Elk Grove Blvds,
and construction of a Traffic Management Center at
the City Corporation Yard.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 Benefit Assessment District
$382,000 $382,000
2005 Developer Traffic Impact Fees
$68,000 $355,000 $423,000
2005 Intelligent Transportation System Funds
$827,000 $827,000
2005 Sacramento County Measure A Sales Tax
$68,000 $341,000 $409,000
$136,000
$0 $1,905,000 $2,041,000
Federal Project
Total Cost $2,041,000
Exempt
Category:
Traffic control devices and operating assistance other than signalization projects
SACOG ID
SAC24070 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Folsom Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC24070 n/a 06 OCT 2005
Folsom Railroad Block Phase 1
On Reading Street in Historic District, construct
transit access to new Light Rail Station.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 Federal Demonstration Funds
$1,600,000 $1,600,000
2005 Federal Demonstration Funds
$180,000 $180,000
2005 Local Transportation Fund
$227,000 $227,000
$180,000
$0 $1,827,000 $2,007,000
Federal Project
Total Cost $2,007,000
Exempt
Category:
Construction of small passenger shelters and information kiosks
205
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
Projects from past MTIPs, Including 2005/07, That Are In Progress
SACOG ID
SAC20570 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Folsom Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC20570 n/a 06 JAN 2008
Folsom Railroad Block Phase 3
Phase 3: Includes construction of public plaza areas
within and adjacent to the Folsom Railroad Block
Project. This consists of pedestrian and disabled
access improvements connecting the transit plaza at
the west end with the remainder of the historic
Folsom Railroad Bloc, including a functional and
attractive system of public open spaces, as well as
other hardscape and landscape improvements and
lighting. Previous phases included:
Phase 1: construction of a transit plaza adjacent to
the light rail station and improvements to Reading
Street. These improvements are to accommodate
transit bus, bicycle and pedestrian connections to
light rail.
Phase 2: construction of the "Historic Folsom Station
Park & Ride Facility."
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
Projects from past MTIPs, Including 2005/07, That Are In Progress
SACOG ID
SAC24067 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Folsom Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC24067 n/a 06 MAR 2007
Glenn Drive Light Rail Station Transit Oriented
Development Master Plan
In Folsom, Glenn Drive Light Rail Station: conduct
strategic planning to develop light rail station into a
transit-oriented development, including a
marketing/implementation plan for coordination
activities, public outreach and partnership
opportunities.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality
$144,540 $144,540
2005 Local Agency Funds
$20,460 $20,460
$165,000
$0
$0
$165,000
Federal Project
Total Cost $165,000
Exempt
Category:
Specific activities which do not involve or lead directly to construction, such as: planning and technical studies, grants for training
and research programs, planning activities conducted pursuant to titles 23 and 49 U.S.c., and Federal-aid systems revisions
SACOG ID
SAC21550 Sacramento County Lead Agency City of Galt Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC21550 n/a 06 MAR 2005
Carol Dr. and East Stockton Blvd. Bikelanes
In the City of Galt, construct Class II bikelane on
Carol Dr. from Amador Ave. north onto East Stockton
Blvd to Walnut Ave.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
Projects from past MTIPs, Including 2005/07, That Are In Progress
SACOG ID
SAC24069 Sacramento County Lead Agency Sacramento County Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC24069 n/a 06 JUL 2007
Hurley Way Revitalization
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 Local Agency Funds
$20,410 $20,410
2005 Regional Surface Transportation Program
$139,590 $139,590
$160,000
$0
$0
$160,000
Project Description
In Sacramento County, Hurley Way from Watt
Avenue to American River Parkway: perform planning
for the reconfiguration of the street, including
analysis, design and planning of sidewalk
infrastructure, pedestrian crosswalks, transit
facilities, intersection and drainage improvements,
landscaping and bicycle lanes.
Federal Project
Total Cost $160,000
Exempt
Category:
Bicycle and pedestrian facilities
SACOG ID
SAC24059 Sacramento County Lead Agency Sacramento County Dept of Transportation
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC24059 n/a 06 2006
Road Rehabilitation
Asphalt Concrete overlay of existing roadways.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
Projects from past MTIPs, Including 2005/07, That Are In Progress
SACOG ID
SAC16310 Sacramento County Lead Agency Sacramento Transportation Authority
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SAC16310 n/a 06 2005
Freeway Service Patrol
Sacramento County: provide motorist assistance and
towing of disabled vehicles during am and pm
commute periods on various highways in Sacramento
County and a portion of I-80 in Yolo County.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
Projects from past MTIPs, Including 2005/07, That Are In Progress
SACOG ID
CAL17660 Sutter County Lead Agency Caltrans District 3
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
CAL17660 1A432 06 2020
Sutter Route 99 Corridor Project
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
08
$43,500,000 $43,500,000
$2,770,000
$900,000 $43,500,000 $47,170,000
Project Description
Near Yuba City, Route 99 from Garden Highway to
Sacramento Avenue, widen from 2 to 4 lanes, with a
median left-turn lane, new bridge and an
undercrossing.
Federal Project
Total Cost $47,170,000
SACOG ID
SUT10781 Sutter County Lead Agency City of Live Oak
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Last Revised
Completion Year
SUT10781 n/a 06 SEP 2006
Elm Street signal
EA Number
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 Local Agency Funds
$40,000 $220,000 $260,000
2005 Regional Surface Transportation Program
$40,000 $40,000
$80,000
$0
$220,000
$300,000
Project Description
install a new signal light at the intersection of Elm
Street and State Route 99
Federal Project
Total Cost $300,000
Exempt
Category:
Intersection signalization projects at individual intersections
SACOG ID
SUT10250 Sutter County Lead Agency Yuba City Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
SUT10250 n/a 06 2005
Bridge Street Widening
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 Local Transportation Fund
$1,150,000 $1,150,000
$0
$0 $1,150,000 $1,150,000
Project Description
In Yuba City, Bridge Street from Cooper Street to
Gray Avenue: widen to 4 lanes.
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $1,150,000
210
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
Projects from past MTIPs, Including 2005/07, That Are In Progress
SACOG ID
SUT10260 Sutter County Lead Agency Yuba City Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Last Revised
Completion Year
SUT10260 n/a 06 2005
Harter Road
EA Number
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 Developer Capital Investment
$7,500,000 $7,500,000
$0
$0 $7,500,000 $7,500,000
Project Description
In Yuba City, construct 4 lane Harter Road between
SR 20 and Bridge Street, construct streetscaping
improvements on Harter from Butte House Rd to SR
20, install signal at Harter and Butte House and
modify signal at Harter and SR 20.
Regionally Significant
Total Cost $7,500,000
SACOG ID
CAL17260 Various Counties Lead Agency Caltrans District 3
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
CAL17260 372300 06 2011
SR 70 Marysville-Oroville Freeway
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
Projects from past MTIPs, Including 2005/07, That Are In Progress
SACOG ID
VAR10350 Various Counties Lead Agency SACOG
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
VAR10350 n/a 06 2007
Rancho Cordova-Placer Connector
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 Local Agency Funds
$150,000 $150,000
2005 Regional Surface Transportation Program $1,100,000 $1,100,000
$1,250,000
$0
$0 $1,250,000
Project Description
In Sacramento and Placer Counties: study a
multi-modal connector between Rancho Cordova and
Placer County.
Federal Project
Total Cost $1,250,000
Exempt
Category:
Specific activities which do not involve or lead directly to construction, such as: planning and technical studies, grants for training
and research programs, planning activities conducted pursuant to titles 23 and 49 U.S.c., and Federal-aid systems revisions
SACOG ID
VAR11000 Various Counties Lead Agency SACOG
SACOG ID #
Project Title
Project Description
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
VAR11000 n/a 06 2006
Regionwide STARNET Integration
In SACOG region, implement regionwide STARNET
integration and related ITS projects.
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
Projects from past MTIPs, Including 2005/07, That Are In Progress
SACOG ID
YST10260 Various Counties Lead Agency Yuba Sutter Transit
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
YST10260 n/a 06 2005
Commuter Bus Purchase
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

Sacramento Area Council of Governments
Projects from past MTIPs, Including 2005/07, That Are In Progress
SACOG ID
YOL16020 Yolo County Lead Agency City of Davis Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
YOL16020 n/a 06 SEP 2005
Davis 2005 Street Rehabilitation
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 Local Agency Funds
$207,000 $207,000
2005 Regional Surface Transportation Program
$293,000 $293,000
$0
$0
$500,000
$500,000
Project Description
In Davis, various streets, rehabilitate pavement.
Federal Project
Total Cost $500,000
Exempt
Category:
Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation
SACOG ID
YOL17220 Yolo County Lead Agency City of Davis Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
YOL17220 n/a 06 SEP 2005
Davis 2005 Street Rehabilitation
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
2005 Local Agency Funds
$194,000 $194,000
2005 Regional Surface Transportation Program
$233,100 $233,100
$0
$0
$427,100
$427,100
Project Description
In Davis, various streets to be determined: perform
pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation.
Federal Project
Total Cost $427,100
Exempt
Category:
Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation
SACOG ID
YOL17090 Yolo County Lead Agency City of Davis Dept of Public Works
SACOG ID #
Project Title
EA Number
Last Revised
Completion Year
YOL17090 0L0724 06 SEP 2007
Davis 2006 Street Rehabilitation
Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue

SECTION 5
GROUPED PROJECT LISTING:
INDIVIDUAL PROJECT INFORMATION
215

LEAD AGENCY
Bicycle and pedestrian facilities
LUMP
SUM
Grouped Project Detailed Listing
SACOG
ID PROJECT TITLE PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL COST
El Dorado County Parks and Recreation VAR30000 ELD19184 El Dorado Trail - Smith Flat to Camino Construct .70 miles of Class I Bike path along the Michigan/California Corridor of
$270,000 2007
Heights
the El Dorado Trail from Walk About Way to Los Trampas Drive.
City of Loomis Dept of Public Works VAR30000 PLA20910 Taylor Road Bike and Turn Lane In Loomis, Taylor Road from King Road to north town limits: add turn lane and
$690,000 2008
bike lanes.
City of Roseville Dept of Public Works VAR30000 PLA19960 I-80 to Royer Park Bikeway Roseville, Harding Blvd. @ Dry Creek, I-80 to Royer Park: construct class 1
$3,140,143 2006
bikeway in 2 phases.
City of Roseville Dept of Public Works VAR30000 PLA19860 Roseville Bikeway Master Plan In Roseville, provide signs and striping for new class 2 and 3 bikeways. $105,000 2007
Implementation
Placer County Dept of Public Works VAR30000 PLA25126 Coon Creek Regional Park Bike Trail Placer County intends to construct multi-use trails, parking lot and staging area and
$946,194 2012
Project
related improvements.
City of Elk Grove VAR30000 SAC19780 East Stockton Blvd Bike/Ped In Elk Grove, East Stockton Blvd. from Calvine Rd. to Elk Grove-Florin Rd.:
$703,104 2006
Improvements
construct class 1 & 2 bikeways, sidewalks, and pedestrian traffic signals.
City of Elk Grove VAR30000 SAC24130 Elk Grove Creek/SR-99 Trail Crossing Extend the existing Class I bikeway from Laguna Springs Dr cross over W.
$2,066,722 2007
Stockton Blvd/SR-99 and E Stockton Blvd and connect to Emerald Park Drive
City of Folsom Dept of Public Works VAR30000 SAC22510 East Bidwell Bicycle / Pedestrian In Folsom, at East Bidwell Street and Humbug-Willow Creek Parkway, construct
$1,441,000 2007
Crossing and Trail Approaches overcrossing of East Bidwell and connector trail.
City of Folsom Dept of Public Works VAR30000 SAC24136 Humbug-Willow Creek Trail/Lake
Natoma Bikeway Gap Closure Project
Contruction of a Class I bike trail from Blue Ravine Road to the Lake Natoma trail.
Project includes approximatley 4,000 linear feet of ashphalt trail and two bridges.
$603,441 Sep-07
COMP
YEAR
City of Galt Dept of Public Works VAR30000 SAC24137 Northeast Bicycle Lane and Pedestrian
Connection Project
Add bicycle and pedestrian facilities to 3 locations in Northeast Galt. 1. From East
Stockton Blvd. and Twin Cities Rd to 1,150 feet south of intersection. 2. From
Walnut Ave. and East Stockton Blvd. to 1,280 feet north of intersection. 3. From
East Stockton Blvd. and Twin Cities Rd. to 450 feet east of interseciton. 2,880
linear feet of improvements. Provides comprehensive bicycle and pedestrian
connection between residential, commerical, school, and park and recreation areas.
$412,290 Jun-07
Yolo County Dept of Public Works VAR30000 YOL15440 CR 99, CR 29 & CR 99D Bikeways In Yolo County, CR 99 from CR 27 to CR 29 and CR 29 from CR 99 to SR 113 and
CR 99D from CR 29 to Davis City limits: construct class II bikeways by adding
four foot shoulders and rehabilitating existing roadway.
Yolo County Dept of Public Works VAR30000 YOL15520 County Road 32A Bike Lane In Yolo County on CR 32A, from CR 105 to Mace Blvd.: rehabilitate roadway and
add four foot bike lanes.
Yuba County Dept of Public Works VAR30000 YUB15853 Lindhurst Avenue Bikeway Project Lindhurst Ave., from Olivehurst Ave. north to Scales Ave.: construct Class II bike
lanes
Changes in vertical and horizontal alignment
City of Woodland Dept of Public Works VAR32000 YOL17570 Lemen Ave. North St. Realignment In Woodland, Lemen Avenue and North Street at East Street: realign Lemen
Avenue to connect with North Street at East Street (Phase 1).
Intersection signalization projects at individual intersections
El Dorado County Dept of Transportation VAR39000 ELD15000 Cambridge/Merrychase at US 50 In El Dorado County, Cambridge Road/Merrychase Drive at WB US 50: signalize
on/off ramps and construct related intersection improvements
Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation
City of Placerville Dept of Public Works VAR42000 ELD12100 Placerville Road Rehabiliation In Placerville, various locations: rehabilitate roads -arterials, collectors and transit
routes.
El Dorado County Dept of Transportation VAR42000 ELD12000 El Dorado County Road Rehabilitation In El Dorado County, various locations, rehabilitate roads: arterials, collectors and
transit routes.
El Dorado County Dept of Transportation VAR42000 ELD19171 Roadway Surface Treatment in El Various streets within the urbanized area of El Dorado County (portions of the El
Dorado Hills
Dorado Hills community): As-needed roadway surface treatment/rehabilitation of
roadways in the El Dorado Hills community that are within the Sacramento
Region's urbanized area as defined by the federal government as of 2005.
Total $13,681,011
$1,625,912 2007
$1,281,857 2008
$395,348 Nov-07
$1,768,000 2007
$1,027,126 2007
$2,450,000 2007
$1,560,700 2006
$360,000 2006
216

Grouped Project Detailed Listing
LUMP SACOG
COMP
LEAD AGENCY SUM ID PROJECT TITLE PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL COST YEAR
Caltrans District 3 VAR42000 CAL18734 I-80 Rainbow to Kingvale Road Rehab In Placer County - Rainbow to Kingvale - rehabilitate roadway $33,952,480 Dec-08
City of Auburn Dept. of Public Works VAR42000 PLA25124 City of Auburn Urban Overlays In Auburn, various locations: perform pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation
on urban roadways.
Caltrans District 3 VAR42000 CAL18761 Sacramento I-5 Road Rehabilitation Sacramento County, in Sacramento, on Interstate 5, from the American River
Bridge to the Sacramento River Bridge (PM 25.4 / 34.3), Install roadway overlay,
including overlay of auxiliary lanes and ramps; reconstruct metal beam guardrail;
replace drainage dikes; and replace Portland Cement Concrete slabs.
$1,000,000 2006
$6,134,000 Dec-07
Caltrans District 3 VAR42000 CAL18762 Sacramento SR-51 Roadway
Rehabilitation
Sacramento County, in Sacramento, on SR-51, from the Fort Sutter Viaduct to 0.4
Miles south of Marconi Avenue Overcrossing, replace Portland Cement Concrete
Pavement with Rapid Set Concrete Pavement; replace digouts; and apply a new
layer of open-graded rubberized asphalt concrete.
$4,650,000 Sep-06
Reconstruction of portions of pavement on the City's arterial roadways $1,200,000 Apr-07
City of Citrus Heights VAR42000 SAC24135 Road Reconstruction and
Rehabilitation
City of Citrus Heights VAR42000 SAC24146 Road Rehab Various Locations: Rehabilitate roads. $800,543 2008
City of Elk Grove VAR42000 SAC24147 Road Rehab Various Locations: Rehabilitate roads. $1,195,259 2008
City of Folsom Dept of Public Works VAR42000 SAC20480 Folsom Road Rehabilitation In Folsom, various major arterial roadways: road rehabilitation. $1,439,060 2006
City of Folsom Dept of Public Works VAR42000 SAC24148 Road Rehab Various Locations: Rehabilitate roads. $742,817 2008
City of Galt Dept of Public Works VAR42000 SAC24149 Road Rehab Various Locations: Rehabilitate roads. $225,682 2008
City of Rancho Cordova VAR42000 SAC24150 Road Rehab Various Locations: Rehabilitate roads. $566,241 2008
City of Sacramento Dept of Transportation VAR42000 SAC24151 Road Rehab Various Locations: Rehabilitate roads. $4,297,236 2008
Sacramento County Dept of Transportation VAR42000 SAC24152 Road Rehab Various Locations in unincorporated Sacramento County and the Galt: Rehabilitate
$5,862,496 2008
roads.
Caltrans District 3 VAR42000 CAL10690 SR 20 Road Rehabilitation In Sutter County, SR 20 from Sacramento River Bridge to Hagerman Road,
$4,893,000 Mar-06
rehabilitate roadway.
City of Live Oak VAR42000 SUT10220 Archer Avenue Reconstruction In the City of Live Oak, Archer Avenue from Live Oak Blvd. (SR 99) to 250' east
$282,390 Oct-06
of L Street: reconstruct/rehabilitate pavement and construct drainage
improvements, curb, gutter and sidewalk. (Phase 1 of 3)
City of Live Oak VAR42000 SUT10829 Road Rehab Various Locations: Rehabilitate roads $88,558 2008
Sutter County Dept of Public Works VAR42000 SUT10790 George Washington Road Franklin Road to Lincoln Road: conform grind, level course, fabric, overlay,
$150,000 Aug-07
shoulders
Sutter County Dept of Public Works VAR42000 SUT10788 Township Road Clark Avenue to Pennington Road: Conform grind, level course, fabric, overlay,
$807,636 Aug-06
shoulders
Yuba City Dept of Public Works VAR42000 SUT10830 Road Rehab Various Locations: Rehabilitate roads $758,613 2008
Caltrans District 3 VAR42000 CAL10760 I-80 Rehabilitation Near West Near West Sacramento, I-80 from Yolo Causeway to Sacramento River:
$10,849,000 Jan-07
Sacramento
rehabilitate roadway.
City of Davis Dept of Public Works VAR42000 YOL19214 Road Rehab Various locations, rehabilitate roads. $613,861 2008
City of West Sacramento Dept of Public Works VAR42000 YOL19215 Road Rehab Various Locations: Rehabilitate roads $498,244 2008
City of Winters Dept of Public Works VAR42000 YOL17725 Railroad Avenue Road Rehabilitation In Winters, Railroad Avenue from Anderson Avenue to Niemann Street:
$215,000 Dec-07
rehabilitate pavement, repair or provide new curb, gutter, sidewalk and
City of Winters Dept of Public Works VAR42000 YOL19216 Road Rehab Various Locations: Rehabilitate roads. $73,167 2008
City of Winters Dept of Public Works VAR42000 YOL16610 Winters Road Rehabilitation 2004 In Winters, various locations: rehabilitate streets. $500,000 2007
City of Woodland Dept of Public Works VAR42000 YOL19217 Road Rehab Various Locations: Rehabilitate roads. $549,906 2008
City of Marysville Dept of Public Works VAR42000 YUB15700 2002 Pavement Rehabilitation Project In Marysville, various roads including Rideout Way: phase 2 pavement
$480,064 2009
Phase 2
rehabilitation.
Yuba County Dept of Public Works VAR42000 YUB15855 Feather River Blvd. Rehab Feather River Blvd., Grand to Ella: resurface. $847,170 2008
Yuba County Dept of Public Works VAR42000 YUB15590 Arboga Road Pavement Rehabilitation In Yuba County, Community of Linda, Arboga Rd. from Erle Rd. to Broadway:
$300,000 Oct-06
rehabilitate pavement.
Yuba County Dept of Public Works VAR42000 YUB15854 Loma Rica Road Rehab Phase 2 Loma Rica Rd, Fruitland to Scott Grant Rd: Resurface. $621,258 2007
Yuba County Dept of Public Works VAR42000 YUB15680 Willow Glen Road Pavement In Yuba County, Willow Glen Road from Marysville Road to Frenchtown Road:
$1,000,000 2007
Rehabilitation
rehabilitate roadway.
Yuba County Dept of Public Works VAR42000 YUB15856 Woodruff Lane Rehab Woodruff Ln., Jack Slough Rd. to Route 70: Resurface. $564,780 2008
217

LEAD AGENCY
LUMP
SUM
Plantings, landscaping, etc.
Caltrans District 3 VAR43000 CAL18735 I-80 Roseville Planting & Irrigation
Grouped Project Detailed Listing
SACOG
ID PROJECT TITLE PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL COST
In Roseville - Sacramento County Line to 0.2 mile west of Douglas Blvd - planting
Rehabilitation
and irrigation rehabilitation, and safety enhancements.
Caltrans District 3 VAR43000 CAL17150 SR 99 Landscaping & Irrigation In Sacramento, SR 99 from 0.2 miles south to 0.2 miles north of Florin Road:
replace plants and upgrade irrigation.
City of Rancho Cordova VAR43000 SAC22180 Landscaping US 50 at Mather Field Rd
Interchange
Design, install, and maintain landscape improvements within the existing freeway
interchange of US 50 at Mather Field Road. Includes streetscape, lighting, and
other enhancements on Mather Field Rd between Folsom and Mather Commerce
Center.
Caltrans District 3 VAR43000 CAL10700 SR 99 Planting & Irrigation In Yuba City, SR 99 from SR 20 to north of Queens Avenue - replace planting and
upgrade irrigation.
Caltrans District 3 VAR43000 CAL18756 Environmental Mitigation for Yuba SR Environmental Mitigation work (oak trees) for Sutter/Yuba SR70 Corridor project
70 Corridor
which has been commpleted (expressway widening from 0.6 mile north of Bear
River Bridge to 0.3 mile south of McGowan Pkwy overcrossing).
Total $90,529,161
Total $9,407,425
COMP
YEAR
$3,247,558 Nov-06
$1,443,923 Sep-08
$1,600,000 2006
$2,315,944 Jun-09
$800,000 2006
Specific activities which do not involve or lead directly to construction, such as: planning and technical studies, etc...
El Dorado County Transportation Commission VAR53000 ELD15710 El Dorado County PPM Plan, program and monitor $580,000 2009
Placer County Transportation Planning Agency VAR53000 PLA19780 Placer County PPM Plan, program, monitor $790,000 2009
City of Rancho Cordova VAR53000 SAC24153 Rancho Cordova Bicycle Master Plan Develop plan for citywide bicycle system. $179,600 2007
SACOG VAR53000 SUT10450 Sutter County PPM Plan, program and monitor $83,000 2009
SACOG VAR53000 YOL17010 Yolo County PPM Plan, program and monitor $176,000 2009
City of Wheatland VAR53000 YUB15857 Wheatland Bicycle Master Plan Develop citywide bike system with new development standards $31,588 2008
SACOG VAR53000 YUB15630 Yuba County PPM Plan, program and monitor $63,000 2009
Total $1,903,188
Transportation enhancement activities
City of Rancho Cordova VAR55000 SAC21470 Folsom Boulevard Enhancements Project development to Install landscaping and streetscaping on Folsom Blvd.
$3,405,000 2006
between Rod Beaudry Dr. and Sunrise Blvd.
Yuba City Dept of Public Works VAR55000 SUT10794 Bridge Street Reconstruction In Yuba City, from Plumas to Boyd, construct signal-phasing modifications,
$3,401,301 Nov-06
pedestrian-scale street lighting, sidewalks and new pedestrian crossings as part of
the city's downtown revitalization strategy.
Yuba City Dept of Public Works VAR55000 SUT10460 Plumas Street Relocate curbs and sidewalks, modify signals, and remove RR track on Plumas St.
$1,315,100 2006
between bridge and B St.
Total $8,121,401
Widening narrow pavements or reconstructing bridges (no additional travel lanes)
El Dorado County Dept of Transportation VAR56000 ELD16150 Green Valley Road Bridge
In El Dorado County, Green Valley Road at Tennessee Creek: replace existing
$1,970,000 2007
Replacement
bridge.
El Dorado County Dept of Transportation VAR56000 ELD19169 Pleasant Valley Road Left Turn Lane Minor widening of existing roadway to accommodate a center, two-way left turn
$2,623,320 2006
lane. Project does not include any new through travel lanes.
City of Elk Grove VAR56000 SAC20250 West Stockton Blvd./Laguna Creek Replace existing bridge with a new structure to provide 2 traffic lanes, an access
$3,348,000 2007
Bridge
lane, shoulders and a raised sidewalk on west side of bridge
Caltrans District 3 VAR56000 CAL10730 SR 275 Tower Bridge Rehabilitation In West Sacramento, SR 275 Tower Bridge: rehabilitate deck. $2,647,000 2006
Total $10,588,320
Intersection channelization projects
City of Placerville Dept of Public Works VAR58000 ELD14090 Clay Street at Cedar Ravine In Placerville, Clay Street at Main/Cedar Ravine: realign to a four-way roundabout,
$1,316,613 2006
reconstruct Clay Street Bridge and Ivy House parking lot.
El Dorado County Dept of Transportation VAR58000 ELD15280 Mother Lode Drive In Shingle Springs, Mother Lode Drive: construct two-way left turn lane from
$1,178,000 2007
South Shingle Road to French Creek Road.
Total $2,494,613
218

LUMP
SUM
Grouped Project Detailed Listing
SACOG
ID PROJECT TITLE PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL COST
LEAD AGENCY
Railroad/highway crossing
Caltrans District 3 VAR74000 CAL18768 Dinky Way Grade Crossing In the City of Colfax, at the intersection of Dinky Way and UPRR: Eliminate
$300,000 2008
hazards at railroad grade crossing. (USDOT RR Xing # 753152B)
Caltrans District 3 VAR74000 CAL18769 Power Inn Grade Crossing Intersection of Power Inn Rd. and UPRR: Eliminate Hazards at railroad grade
$100,000 2008
crossing. (USDOT RR Xing # 752887F)
Total $400,000
Safety improvement program
Placer County Dept of Public Works VAR75000 CAL18759 Foresthill Rd. Realignment On Foresthill Rd., from 250 ft west to 1000 ft east of Upper Lake Clementine Rd.,
Realign roadway; modify superelevations, roadway drainage and lane
configurations. Install open grade ac; improve striping and signage
Caltrans District 3 VAR75000 CAL18758 Hedge and SR 16 Traffic Signals Hedge Ave. and SR 16 (Jackson Rd.), Install traffic signals with right turn lanes;
$730,000 2006
cooperative project with Caltrans
Total $1,164,000
COMP
YEAR
$434,000 2007
219

Minor Program Lump Sum Listing for SACOG's 2006 MTIP
County Route E.A. Post Miles Project Description Federal FY Total Cost
El Dorado 193 4C2601 R6.183
El Dorado 193 3C6601 0.52
Placer 80, 89 4C9501 69.3
Placer 193 1C580 4.0/4.3
Sacramento 51 0E4901 0.2/1.1
Sacramento 16 4C290 8.3
Sacramento 16 0E730 4.6
Sacramento 160 4C3001 L4.1
Sacramento 51 0E9801 05.5/05.7
Yolo 16 0E390 35.2 / 35.4
Yuba 49 0E200 0.7/3.7
Route 193, about 10 Km East of Cool, At
Slinger Mine Road, Construct Left Turn
Pocket 2006 $700,000
Route 193, Near Cool, At Cherry Acres
Road, Westbound, Construct Left-turn
Channelization 2006 $511,000
Routes 80 and 89, Near Old Truckee Road
and Near Kingvale Mtc. Station, install
perforated metal pipe 2006 $120,000
Route 193, near Newcastle at Fowler Rd,
add left-turn channelization 2006 $997,000
Route 51, in Sacramento, Cold plane AC,
overlay with OGAC, replace joints, concrete
polyester dams and pavement delineation 2006 $934,000
Route 16, near Sacramento, at Excelsior
Rd., install signals 2006 $2,281,000
Route 16, near Sacramento, at Hedge Ave.,
install traffic signal 2006 $450,000
Route 160, At West Sherman Island Road,
Construct left-turn Channelization and
Lighting 2006 $355,000
Route 51, Remove guardrail on the Marconi
curve , , 2006 $120,000
from 0.3 km west of County Road 93 to
County Road, Widen shoulder, construct
left-turn lane pocket, and improve horizontal
alignment 2006 $1,091,000
Route 49, from 1 Km North of Yuba/Sierra
County Line to North Yuba River Bridge No.
13-2 2006 $650,000
Totals: $8,209,000
Prepared by: Susan Wilson
Caltrans District 3
Office of Regional Planning
2/10/2006 220

2004/2005 Highway Bridge Program
This report includes projects that may be programmed under the Local Bridge lump sum grouping.
District
County
Implementing
Agency
Br. No./
FSTIP Grouping
Project
Description
03 El Dorado El Dorado County 25C0004 BRIDGE NO. 25C0004, MT MURPHY RD, OVER S FK AMERICAN
RIV, 0.1 MI E OF S.R. 49. Replace one lane bridge with 2 lane
bridge.
03 El Dorado El Dorado County 25C0038 BRIDGE NO. 25C0038, GREEN VALLEY RD, OVER TENNESSEE
CREEK, 0.2 MI N OF N SHINGLE RD. Replace 2 lane bridge with
new 2 lane bridge.
03 El Dorado Placerville 25C0012 BRIDGE NO. 25C0012, BLAIRS LANE, OVER HANGTOWN CREEK,
150' S/O BROADWAY. Replace one lane bridge with 2 lane bridge.
03 El Dorado Placerville 25C0029 BRIDGE NO. 25C0029, PLACERVILLE DR, OVER HANGTOWN
CREEK, 0.3 MI W COLD SPRINGS RD. Widen bridge to accomodate
two through lanes, 8’ shoulders and a turn lane to match the existing
roadway.
Total for MPO/RTPA: El Dorado County Transportation Commission
(Programmed funds in $1,000)
Fund
Type
Fed.
Match
Total
Total
Prior
FFY
04/05
FFY
05/06
FFY
06/07 Beyond
4,181 681 0 133 0 3,368
542 88 0 17 0 436
4,723
Number of projects: 4
Page 14 Division of Local Assistance RPT: GrpDet
221
12/13/2005, 3:20:33 PM

2004/2005 Highway Bridge Program
This report includes projects that may be programmed under the Local Bridge lump sum grouping.
District
County
Implementing
Agency
Br. No./
FSTIP Grouping
Project
Description
03 Placer Lincoln 19C0199R BRIDGE NO. 19C0199R, NICHOLAS ROAD, OVER MARKHAM
RAVINE, 0.25 MI E/O NEALSON LANE. Replace 2 lane bridge with
2 lane bridge.
03 Placer Placer County 19C0026 BRIDGE NO. 19C0026, SQUAW VALLEY RD, OVER SQUAW
CREEK, 0.6 MI E/O HWY 89. Rehabilitate exisitng deck and
superstructure.
03 Placer Placer County 19C0034 BRIDGE NO. 19C0034, LOZANOS RD, OVER AUBURN RAVINE,
NEAR CHILI HILL RD. Replace 2 lane bridge with new 2 lane bridge.
03 Placer Placer County 19C0035 BRIDGE NO. 19C0035, WISE RD, OVER AUBURN RAVINE, BTWN
MILLERTON & STONE RD. Replace the existing 2 lane bridge with a
new 2 lane bridge.
03 Placer Placer County 19C0060 BRIDGE NO. 19C0060, AUBURN-FRSTHILL RD, OVER N FK
AMERICAN RIVER, EAST OF I-80. Paint exisitng steel structure.
03 Placer Placer County 19C0060 BRIDGE NO. 19C0060A, AUBURN-FRSTHILL RD, OVER N FK
AMERICAN RIVER, EAST OF I-80. Mand Seismic Retrofit (HBRR)
03 Placer Placer County 19C0114 BRIDGE NO. 19C0114, GLADDINGS RD, OVER COON CREEK, 0.8
MI S OF RIOSA RD. Replace exisitng 2 lane bridge with new 2 lane
bridge.
03 Placer Placer County 19C0117 BRIDGE NO. 19C0117, COOK RIOLO RD, OVER DRY CREEK, 1.0
MI S BASE LINE RD. Replace 2 lane bridge with new 2 lane bridge.
03 Placer Placer County 19C0161 BRIDGE NO. 19C0161, BARTON RD, OVER MINERS RAVINE, 0.5
MI S CAVIT STALMAN RD. Replace existing 2 lane birdge with 2 lane
bridge with shoulders and increased hydraulic capacity.
03 Placer Placer County 19C0168 BRIDGE NO. 19C0168, DICK COOK RD, OVER MINERS RAVINE,
NEAR AUBURN FOLSOM RD. Replace existing 2 lane bridge with
new 2 lane bridge.
Total for MPO/RTPA: Placer County Transportation Planning Agency
(Programmed funds in $1,000)
Fund
Type
Fed.
Match
Total
Total
Prior
FFY
04/05
FFY
05/06
FFY
06/07 Beyond
39,894 3,230 3,002 158 221 33,283
5,169 419 389 20 29 4,312
45,063
Number of projects: 10
Page 17 Division of Local Assistance RPT: GrpDet
222
12/13/2005, 3:20:33 PM

2004/2005 Highway Bridge Program
This report includes projects that may be programmed under the Local Bridge lump sum grouping.
District
County
Implementing
Agency
Br. No./
FSTIP Grouping
Project
Description
03 Sacrament
o
03 Sacrament
o
03 Sacrament
o
03 Sacrament
o
Elk Grove 24C0087 BRIDGE NO. 24C0087, W STOCKTON BLVD, OVER LAGUNA
CREEK, 0.5 MI N OF LAGUNA BLVD. Rehabilitate 2 lane bridge
add turn lane & sidewalks, upgrade bridge railings.
Folsom 24C0067 BRIDGE NO. 24C0067, GREENBACK LANE, OVER AMERICAN
RIVER, 0.2 MI E FOLSOM-AUBURN RD. Widen lanes & shoulders
on historic 2 lane bridge and upgrade bridge railings.
Folsom 24C0268 BRIDGE NO. 24C0268, ORANGEVALE AVENUE, OVER GOLD
CREEK, 0.1 MI W AMER RIVER CYN. Replace 2 lane bridge with
new 2 lane bridge.
Sacramento 24C0001 BRIDGE NO. 24C0001, FREEPORT, OVER SACRAMENTO RIVER,
CONCTS FRPRT BL S RIV RD. Paint bridge.
03 Sutter Sutter County 18C0004 BRIDGE NO. 18C0004, GARMIRE RD, OVER TISDALE BYPASS, 0.4
MI NW TISDALE RD. Replace one lane bridge with 2 lane bridge.
03 Sutter Sutter County 18C0040 BRIDGE NO. 18C0040, CRANMORE ROAD, OVER HEAD OF EAST
CANAL, AT TISDALE RD. Replace 2 lane bridge with new 2 lane
bridge.
03 Sutter Sutter County 18C0044 BRIDGE NO. 18C0044, O'BANION RD, OVER SNAKE SLOUGH, 0.2
MI W BOULTON RD. Replace structurally deficient 2 lane bridge with
new 2 lane bridge.
03 Sutter Sutter County 18C0063 BRIDGE NO. 18C0063 & 18C0064, PLEASANT GROVE RD, OVER
CURRY CREEK, 2.9 MI N OF RIEGO RD. and 4.2 MI N SAC CO
LINE. Replace 2 lane bridges with new 2 lane bridges.
03 Sutter Sutter County 18C0065 BRIDGE NO. 18C0065, PLEASANT GROVE RD, OVER PLEASANT
GROVE CREEK, 5.8 MI N/O SACTO CO LINE. Replace 2 lane
bridge with new 2 lane bridge.
03 Sutter Yuba City 18C0012 Seismic Retrofit.
03 Yolo Yolo County 22C0074 BRIDGE NO. 22C0074, CO RD 57, OVER CACHE CREEK, 0.42 MI E
OF SH 16. Mand Seismic Retrofit (HBRR)
03 Yolo Yolo County 22C0083 BRIDGE NO. 22C0083, COUNTY ROAD 85, OVER SOUTH FORK
OAT CREEK, 0.4 MI N OF CR #13. Replace existing structurally
deficient 2 lane with new 2 lane bridge.
03 Yolo Yolo County 22C0122 BRIDGE NO. 22C0122, C.R. #95, OVER SOUTH FORK WILLOW
SLOUGH, 0.82 MI S OF C.R. #25. Replace exisitng 2 lane bridge with
new 2 lane bridge.
03 Yolo Yolo County 22C0135 BRIDGE NO. 22C0135, COUNTY ROAD 89, OVER BUCKEYE
CREEK, 0.04 MI NORTH OF CR #3B. Replace existing structurally
deficient 2 lane bridge with a new 2 lane bridge.
03 Yolo Yolo County 22C0145 BRIDGE NO. 22C0145, C. R. #89, OVER SOUTH FORK WILLOW
SLOUGH, 0.22 MI N OF S.H. 16. Replace existing multi-barrel
culvert structure with new 2 lane bridge.
03 Yuba Yuba County 16C0003 BRIDGE NO. 16C0003, LOMA RICA RD, OVER JACK SLOUGH, 0.8
MI N OF ST RTE 20. Upgrade bridge railings.
03 Yuba Yuba County 16C0005 BRIDGE NO. 16C0005, MARYSVILLE RD, OVER LITTLE DRY
CREEK, 2.2 MI NORTH OF S.R. 20. Upgrade bridge railings.
03 Yuba Yuba County 16C0025 BRIDGE NO. 16C0025, HONCUT RD, OVER SOUTH HONCUT
CREEK, 0.6 MI N FRUITLAND RD. Replace one lane bridge with 2
lane bridge.
Page 18 Division of Local Assistance RPT: GrpDet
223
12/13/2005, 3:20:33 PM

2004/2005 Highway Bridge Program
This report includes projects that may be programmed under the Local Bridge lump sum grouping.
District
County
Implementing
Agency
Br. No./
FSTIP Grouping
Project
Description
03 Yuba Yuba County 16C0031 BRIDGE NO. 16C0031, WOODRUFF LANE, OVER JACK SLOUGH,
0.5 MI E JACK SLOUGH RD. Upgrade bridge railings.
03 Yuba Yuba County 16C0046 BRIDGE NO. 16C0046, LA PORTE RD, OVER NEW YORK CREEK,
0.3 MI N NEW YORK FLAT RD. Replace 2 lane bridge with new 2
lane bridge.
Total for MPO/RTPA: Sacramento Area Council Of Governments
(Programmed funds in $1,000)
Fund
Type
Fed.
Match
Total
Total
Prior
FFY
04/05
FFY
05/06
FFY
06/07 Beyond
31,227 4,011 565 7,974 9 18,668
4,046 520 73 1,033 1 2,419
35,273
Number of projects: 20
Page 19 Division of Local Assistance RPT: GrpDet
224
12/13/2005, 3:20:33 PM

2005/2006 HES PROGRAM PLAN - WORK TYPE PROJECTS
DISTRICT AGENCY LOCODE MPO LOCATION OF WORK DESCRIPTION OF WORK
ORIGINAL
ESTIMATE
FEDERAL
FUNDS
1 01 Del Norte County 5901 RURAL
INTERSECTION OF WASHINGTON
BLVD. AND ARLINGTON DR/
INSTALL TRAFFIC SIGNAL; UPGRADE CURB
RAMPS AND INSTALL CROSSWALKS. $204,000 $183,600
2 01 Lake County 5914 RURAL
3 02 Anderson 5321 SHASTA
4 02 Trinity County 5905 RURAL
5 03 Butte County 5912 BCAG
6 03
Sacramento
County 5924 SACOG
7 03 Placer County 5919 SACOG
8 03 Nevada County 5917 RURAL
San Francisco
9 04 County 5934 MTC
10 04 Vallejo 5030 MTC
11 04 Newark 5317 MTC
SODA BAY RD. BETWEEN BLOWER
RD. AND PARK DR.
INTERSECTION OF SR 273 AND
BRUCE ST.
CANYON CREEK RD. AT PM 2.6; ALSO
ALONG 13.5 MILES OF OUTSIDE
LANE; WILDWOOD RD. AT PM 1.1,
1.5, 7.3, 9.0, AND 9.4.
SR 70 AT OPHIR RD. AND PACIFIC
HEIGHTS RD.
INTERSECTION OF HEDGE AVE. AND
SR 16 (JACKSON ROAD)
ON FORESTHILL RD. FROM 250 FT.
WEST TO 1000 FT. EAST OF UPPER
LAKE CLEMENTINE RD.
BRUNSWICK RD. AND TOWN TALK
REALIGN ROADWAY TO STRAIGHTEN TWO
SEVERE CURVES. $400,000 $360,000
INSTALL NEW TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND
CONSTRUCT TURNING LANES;
COOPERATIVE PROJECT WITH CALTRANS. $780,000 $351,000
INSTALL METAL BEAM GUARDRAIL WITH
END TREATMENTS; INSTALL
THERMOPLASTIC EDGELINE WITH
DELINEATORS. $370,000 $333,000
RELOCATE EXISTING INTERSECTION;
INSTALL TRAFFIC SIGNALS; REALIGN
EXISTING FRONTAGE ROADS AND
CONSTRUCT VARIOUS TURN LANES;
COOPERATIVE PROJECT WITH CALTRANS. $3,600,000 $360,000
INSTALL TRAFFIC SIGNALS WITH RIGHT
TURN LANES; COOPERATIVE PROJECT
WITH CALTRANS. $730,000 $328,500
REALIGN ROADWAY; MODIFY
SUPERELEVATIONS, ROADWAY DRAINAGE
AND LANE CONFIGURATIONS. INSTALL
OPEN GRADE AC; IMPROVE STRIPING AND
SIGNAGE. $434,000 $360,000
RD. CONSTRUCT LEFT TURN LANES $350,000 $315,000
INTERSECTION OF INGERSON AVE.
AND GRIFFITH ST. CONSTRUCT NEW BUS STOP APRON. $380,000 $342,000
UPGRADE TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND
INTERSECTION OF GEORGIA ST. AND PEDESTRIAN CROSSING EQUIPMENT;
ALAMEDA ST.
INSTALL TURNING LANES. $170,000 $153,000
INTERSECTION OF THORNTON AVE.
AND CEDAR BLVD 225 GROOVE PAVEMENT $22,000 $19,800

SECTION 6:
GLOSSARY OF TERMS AND ACRONYMS USED IN
THE 2006/08 MTIP
226

GLOSSARY OF TERMS AND ACRONYMS USED IN THE 2006/08 MTIP
The following glossary is intended to serve as a reference for anyone involved in the planning
process, or for those less involved in the planning process, to understand the terms used in the
MTIP.
Air-Oualitv Conformity Analysis: Analysis that determines if certain transportation plans and
programs conform to federal air-quality goals, namely that forecasts of vehicular emissions
resulting from transportation plans stay within acceptable levels. These acceptable levels of
future pollution are determined by the State Implementation Plan (SIP) for air quality. This
analysis is required by federal law.
APCD: Air Pollution Control District, a countywide agency which develops a countywide air
quality plan. APCDs may be multi-county, such as the Yolo-Solano APCD.
AQMD: Air Quality Management District, same role as APCDs above, but created and entitled
by the state legislature specifically for the Sacramento metropolitan area, the Bay Area, and the
South Coast region. AQMDs may be multi-county bodies, although the Sacramento Metropolitan
AQMD includes only Sacramento County. State enabling legislation typically grants AQMDs
statutory powers beyond those of APCDs.
Benefit Assessment District: Fees collected by local agencies from property owners to pay for
new and improved transportation facilities. Fees are calculated based on the anticipated Abenefit@
that the property owners in the area are expected to gain from improvements to the transportation
system. Assessment funds can be used to pay for other infrastructure improvements unless the
local enabling ordinance specifically precludes certain uses.
Caltrans: The California Department of Transportation, responsible for planning, building, and
maintaining the state highway system, and for planning and developing inter-regional
transportation services such as the Capitol Corridor train service, among other duties.
CMA: Congestion Management Agency, a countywide agency responsible for developing the
Congestion Management Program (see below).
CMAQ: Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Program, a federal funding program that funds
transportation projects and programs that will achieve reductions in air pollution from vehicles.
CMP: Congestion Management Program, a countywide program designed to keep traffic
congestion within an acceptable standard. The CMP must include traffic flow standards,
standards for public transit service, a program to analyze the traffic impacts of land use
decisions, a Atrip reduction/travel demand A element to reduce vehicular use, and a seven year
capital improvement program.
1
227

CTC: California Transportation Commission, a governor-appointed body that reviews regional
transportation improvement programs (see RTIP below) and decides which specific projects and
programs will receive state funding. These chosen projects become the State Transportation
improvement Program (see STLP below).
Conformity:
See Air-Quality Conformity Analysis above.
Developer Fee: Fees collected by local agencies from developers of new residential and office
buildings to pay for improvements to the transportation system made necessary by the new
development. Developer Fees are used to pay for whole transportation projects (such as a new
roadway), or will be used to contribute towards the developer=s Afair share@ of improvements to
existing facilities needed in the area. Same as traffic impact fees, except that developer fees can
be used to pay for other infrastructure improvements such as sewer and water lines.
EDCTC: El Dorado County Transportation Commission, the state-designated regional
transportation planning agency for El Dorado County.
EPA: Environmental Protection Agency, a federal agency which reviews our air quality
conformity analyses and advises FHWA and FTA regarding approval of the conformity finding.
FHWA: Federal Highway Administration, one of two primary federal agencies that SACOG
work with in our transportation planning efforts. FHWA provides a joint conformity finding on
our Metropolitan Transportation Plan and MTIP, and allocates federal transportation funds to the
state for distribution to the region.
FLP: Federal Lands Program, a federal program administered by the U.S. Forest Service to
improve roadways on federal lands.
Forest Lands: See FLP above.
FTA: Federal Transit Administration, the other of two primary federal agencies that SACOO
works with in our transportation planning efforts. FTA develops federal policy on public transit
issues, and allocates capital and operating funds for public transit projects.
PTA Section 5309: Formerly known as the PTA Section 3 program. This program pays for major
bus purchases and light rail extensions, such as the extension of light rail to Meadowview Road
in South Sacramento County.
FTA Section 5307: Formerly known as the PTA Section 9 program. This program pays for
transit capital and operating expenses for urban transit operators (population greater than
50,000).
PTA Section 5310 : Formerly known as the FTA Section 16 program. This program pays for
transit capital programs that benefit elderly and handicapped people.
FTA Section 5311: Formerly known as the FTA Section 18 program. This program pays for
228

transit capital and operating expenses for rural transit operators (population less than
50,000).
Financial Constraint: The MTIP must be financially constrained by year and include a financial
plan that demonstrates which projects can be implemented using current revenue sources and
which projects are to be implemented using proposed revenue sources. Only projects for which
construction and operating funds can reasonably be expected to be available may be included in
the MTIP (23 CFR, Part 450, Section 450.324).
Grouped Projects: Air quality exempt projects of a small scale are often suitable for combining
into a single larger project listing or grouped project. Grouped projects are identified in the
MTIP under Avarious counties@ and are shown under the appropriate air quality exempt category
listing.
HBRR: Highway Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation Program, a federal funding program
used to repair and replace bridges on state highways and local roads.
HES: Hazard Elimination and Safety Program, a federal funding program used to pay for safety
improvements to state highways and local roads, such as guard rails and roadway signage.
ISTEA: Internodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991. Predecessor to TEA 21. (See
TEA 21 below)
Interstate Maintenance: A federal funding program used to pay for maintenance projects on
interstate freeways.
Lead Agencies: State or local agencies or RTPAs (see RTPA below) who are charged with the
lead for implementing specific transportation projects and programs in the MTIP. Local
agencies include but are not limited to public works and planning agencies, air districts, transit
operators, and special districts.
LRT: Light Rail Transit, such as the light rail system here in Sacramento.
MPA: Metropolitan Planning Area, the boundary includes the entire federal air quality nonattainment
area and the remainder of Sutter and Yuba Counties for the purposes of federal
transportation planning, programming, and determining air quality conformity of plans and
programs.
MPO: Metropolitan Planning Organization, a federal designation granted to the agency
charged with conducting regional transportation planning. SACOG is the designated
MPO for Sacramento, Suffer, Yolo, and Yuba Counties, and El Dorado and Placer
Counties outside of the Tahoe Basin.
Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program (MTIP): Also known as the federal TIP, a
three-year list of specific transportation projects and programs which SACOG submits to
229

Caltrans. SACOG amends the MTIP on a quarterly cycle. The MTIP and its amendments are
subject to air-quality conformity analysis under federal air-quality conformity regulations.
MTP: Metropolitan Transportation Plan, a 20-year blueprint for transportation strategies for the
region, developed and updated by SACOG. Under state law the MTP is updated by December 1
of even-numbered years. Under federal law, the MTP must be updated at least once every three
years.
NHS: National Highway System, a federal funding program used to implement improvements to
roadways designated as part of the NHS. Congress adopted the NHS in November 1995.
Non-Attainment Area: A federally-designated area that fails to meet air-quality standards. The
Sacramento non-attainment area includes all of Sacramento and Yolo Counties, northern Solano
County, south Sutter County, and Placer and El Dorado Counties outside of the Tahoe Basin.
Non-attainment areas are defined by the Environmental Protection Agency, based on
topography, climate, and wind patterns.
PCTPA: Placer County Transportation Planning Agency, the state-designated regional
transportation planning agency for Placer County, and its locally-designated congestion
management agency.
P116: Proposition 116, a state funding program used to implement rail transit and bikeway
projects throughout the state. Proposition 116 is a bond program approved by state voters in
1992.
RTIP: Regional Transportation improvement Program, a seven-year list of specific
transportation projects and programs which SACOG submits to the California Transportation
Commission as a request for state funding. The Regional 1W must be submitted by December 1
of every odd-numbered year.
RTPA: Regional Transportation Planning Agency, a state designation of the agency responsible
for regional transportation planning to meet state planning requirements. The RTPA is not
always the same agency as the federally-designated MPO (see MPO above).
130 RAIL: Surface Transportation Program - Rail Crossing Improvement Program, a federal
funding program used to improve the safety of rail crossings on surface streets.
Regional Planning Partnership: A committee of close to 100 representatives from local, regional,
state, and federal agencies, as well as representatives of business, environmental, and minority
organizations and associations. The Partnership assists SACOG with its transportation and air
quality planning responsibilities. The Partnership meets as needed.
Road Fund: A local funding source derived from a portion of the state gasoline tax. These funds
are Asubvented@ from the state to local agencies to pay for local transportation improvements.
Road funds are often used to match state or federal funds approved for local projects.
230

SHOPP: State Highway Operation and Protection Program, a list of all operations and
maintenance projects greater than $300,000 on the state highway system which the California
Transportation Commission has approved for state funding. Caltrans prepares the SHOPP with
input from regional transportation planning agencies.
SMAQMD: Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District, the agency responsible
for state-required air quality planning in Sacramento County. SMAQMD and SACOG are jointly
responsible for federally required air quality planning.
SRTD: Sacramento Regional Transit District, the agency that operates Sacramento=s public
transit system, including bus and light rail service. RT is the largest transit operator in the
SACOG region, and the largest in California north of the San Francisco Bay Area.
SRTP: Short Range Transit Plan, a five-year plan required periodically from public transit
operators that receive federal funds.
STA: Sacramento Transportation Authority, the locally designated congestion management
agency for Sacramento County, and the agency that oversees the spending of Sacramento
County=s Measure A sales tax money for transportation projects.
STA Funds: State Transit Assistance Funds, funding for public transit service allocated under the
Transportation Development Act (see TDA). STA funds are derived from the state tax on
gasoline. SACOG is responsible for distributing the region=s apportionment of STA funds to our
member jurisdictions and public transit operators.
State Cash: This term refers to funds that do not include any federal or local funds. This
terminology is used by Caltrans to distinguish these funds from the State Highway Account
which is often a mix of federal and state dollars. State cash is used as a source of matching funds
for the federal dollars used in the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP).
STIP: State Transportation improvement Program, a list of all the transportation projects which
the California Transportation Commission has approved for state funding, chosen from regional
transportation improvement programs from around the state.
STP: Surface Transportation Program, a funding program under ISTEA that provides federal
money for capital improvements to surface transportation systems.
STP-Rail: See 130 RAIL above.
TCI: Transit Capital improvement Program, a state grant program which provides funds to
public transit operators for fixed-guideway transit systems, such as light rail.
TCM: Transportation Control Measure, a measure aimed at reducing vehicular use and thereby
improving air quality. State law requires countywide air quality plans that must include a list of
such measures. These plans, including TCMs, are developed by air pollution control districts or
231

air quality management districts.
TDA: Transportation Development Act, state legislation which provides two major sources of
funding for public transit service, the Local Transportation Fund (LTF) and State Transit
Assistance Fund (STA Funds). SACOO administers these funds for our member jurisdictions
and public transit operators.
TDM: Transportation Demand Management, techniques to reduce the use of motor vehicles or
shift the use of vehicles to uncongested times of the day. TDM could include employersponsored
rideshare programs, or flexible working hours that enable people to commute to work
before or after rush hour, for example.
TSM: Transportation System Management, a state program used to fund local and state
transportation projects that will improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the existing
transportation system without increasing the capacity.
TEA: Transportation Enhancement Activities, a set-aside of STP funds for use on projects that
enhance the quality of life, protect the environment, and provide an aesthetic, pleasant, and
improved interface between the transportation system for communities and people adjacent to
transportation facilities.
TEA 21: Transportation Equity Act for the 21@ Century, the current federal surface
transportation act. TEA 21 outlines federal policy on transportation planning and programming
and includes funding programs for various transportation projects. Successor legislation to
ISTEA.
TEA-3/TEA-LU: Transportation Equity Act - A Legacy for Users, the proposed successor to
TEA 21. Although TEA 21 expired on October 1, 2005, the new authorizing legislation has not
yet been passed. Federal transportation funds continue to flow, however, through a series of
continuing resolutions.
Traffic lmpact Fee: See Developer Fees above.
Unitrans: A public transit operators headquartered at UC Davis, running bus routes that connect
to UC campus to various Davis neighborhoods.
YCTA: Yolo County Transit Authority, the locally designated congestion management agency
for Yolo County, and an operator of public transit service in Yolo County.
YST: Yuba-Sutter Transit, the transit operator and transit planning agency for Sutter and Yuba
Counties.
232

APPENDIX A:
EXPEDITED PROJECT SELECTION PROCEDURES
233

Expedited Project Selection Procedures
• If a region has an approved (by Caltrans) Expedited Project
Selection Procedures (EPSP), project(s) from that region may
be moved within the triennial FSTIP period without an
administrative amendment.
• Projects are only moved within the triennial FSTIP period for
implementation purposes only.
• MPO shall continue to ensure that its FTIP is financially
constrained by year when projects are moved under these
procedures.
• EPSP shall be included as part of FTIP submitted to Caltrans.
234

235

236

237

238

239

APPENDIX B:
PROJECT ELIGIBILITY DETERMINATION FOR
GROUPED PROJECT LISTINGS
240

Project Eligibility Determination for Grouped Project Listings
Project not
eligible for
Grouping
N
Project exempt from Air Quality
Conf?
N
(40CFR93.126 & .127 Tables 2 & 3)
Y
Does scale of project make it appropriate for
grouping? (MPO and State 4 to decide based on $,
public sensitivity, community interest, earmark $ in
project, etc.)
Y
Project eligible for grouping
Y
Transit Projects
All other Projects
• Vehicle purchase projects
are not eligible for
grouping
• Projects must be grouped
by operator
• Name of grouping must
reflect scope of projects
in the group 1
• Projects to be listed per
examples stated below
•
Projects to be grouped by type
of work, not by program 2
• A funding summary for each
grouping will show the $ by
FY for the current cycle, prior
FY $ listed under “Prior” and
later FY $ listed as “Beyond” 3
• A backup list for groupings
should include project specific
information, but no cost data 5
Footnotes:
1. Example by FTA: If one of the grouped projects constructs a kiosk, a second one constructs
benches, and a third one constructs kiosks and shelters, the appropriate description for the
Grouped Project Listing must be “Grouped projects for Kiosks, Shelters and Benches”. The
words “Grouped projects” or “Grouping” should be included in the name of the grouping to
differentiate it from an individually listed project.
Grouped projects: Projects must be grouped by grantee, geographic area, and type of project.
Information on the number of items must be included. Only projects that are anticipated CE’s
can be grouped. The words “Grouped Projects’ should be included in the project line item to
distinguish it from individually listed projects. In all cases, sufficient information must be
provided in the TIP to allow for the identification of elements of FTA grant applications.
241

Example:
Project Name: “Grouped projects: Bus Shelters”
Project description: Installation of 6 bus shelters in San Francisco. Shelters will contain
enclosed passenger-waiting area and benches.
2. Non-Transit Projects in the Grouped Project Listings must be grouped by the pre-approved
type/classification of work (e.g., Rdwy Rehab Grouping, Rdwy Resurfacing Grouping, etc.).
The sponsor of the grouping shall demonstrate how the requested grouping will tie to the
listing(s) in 40CFR93.126 and/or 127 for AQ Attainment and Maintenance Areas or
23CFR771.117 (c) & (d) for AQ Attainment and Unclassified Areas. Note that the items
under 23CFT771.117(d) are not all inclusive; therefore additional items may be added to the
grouping definition as long as project remains Categorically Exempt.
3. Funding summary to include totals for the grouping, but does not list individual project costs.
4. Caltrans Districts and the MPOs will cooperatively decide on the appropriateness of scale of
individual projects for project grouping.
5. Backup listing of projects included in the Grouped Project Listings should contain individual
project information with sufficient description to accurately identify scope, implementing
agency, location, and limits of the project.
242

APPENDIX C:
MAP OF THE SACRAMENTO METROPOLITAN
PLANNING AREA AND SACRAMENTO OZONE
NON-ATTAINMENT AREA
243

Live Oak
Yuba
County
Yuba City
Marysville
Colfax
Tahoe
Basin
Sutter
County
Wheatland
Auburn
Yolo
County
Lincoln
Loomis
Rocklin
Roseville
Placerville
El Dorado
County
Woodland
Citrus Heights
Folsom
Davis
West Sacramento
Sacramento
Rancho Cordova
Winters
Dixon
Solano County
Vacaville
Solano
County
Elk Grove
Sacramento
County
Galt
Sacramento Metropolitan Planning Area
Rio Vista
Isleton
Sacramento Metropolitan Planning Area
Ozone Nonattainment Area
244
5 Miles
10 0 10 20

APPENDIX D:
INDIAN RESERVATION ROAD
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
245

Indian Reservation Road Transportation Improvement Program
Projects that are listed in the Indian Reservation Road Transportation Program (“IRR
TIP”) are included in the applicable MTIP and the MTP “without further action.”
The Federal Highway Administration, Indian Reservation Roads Program, Chapter 6
(http://www/fhwa.dot.gov/flh/reports/Indian/chapter6.htm) states:
“The IRR TIP is included in the Statewide Transportation
Program (STIP) developed by each State Transportation Agency
without further action. If an IRR project lies within a
metropolitan area, it must be included in the metropolitan area
TIP without further action.”
Title 23, United States Code section 204(a) provides that
“(1) In general. – Recognizing the need for all Federal roads that
are public roads to be treated under uniform policies similar to
the policies that apply to Federal-aid highways, there is
established a coordinated Federal lands highways program that
shall apply to public lands highways, park roads and parkways,
refuge roads, and Indian reservation roads and bridges.”
“(5) Inclusion in state programs. – The approved Federal lands
highways program transportation improvement program shall be
included in appropriate State and metropolitan planning
organization plans and programs without further action on the
transportation improvement program.”
BIA, by its Deputy Bureau Director for Tribal Services, has stated by
letter dated December 16, 2005 to Nicolas H. Fonseca, Chairman,
Shingle Springs Rancheria, that the Shingle Springs Rancheria
Interchange is in the IRR TIP. As stated above, projects in the IRR TIP
are in the MTIP and the MTP “without further action” by SACOG.
This project has been included in the ROP SIP analysis and in the
conformity analysis.
No federal, state, or local government funds will be used to construct
the Shingle Springs Interchange.
246

SACOG ID IRR38300 El Dorado County Lead Agency Caltrans District 3
SACOG ID # Last Revised Completion Year Fiscal Year Revenue Source Engineering Right of Way Construction Total Revenue
IRR38300 06 2009

APPENDIX E:
PUBLIC COMMENTS
248

Comment:
Jerome Wiggins, Federal Transit Administration
2/16/06
After further review (like the going up to instant replay booth) I offer the revised
comments:
SACOG still must meet the test of reasonableness for dollars and projects contained in the
MTP and the third yr of the MTIP.
FTA will still require SACOG to identify all sources of funds including those defined as”
other local funds”
On a project by project basis I offer the following revised comments:
Amtrak Folsom Extension:
Keeping in the

Project must pass the test of funding reasonableness of Public Transit account being
included in 2007 in both the MTIP and the MTP.
SSCP2
Please provide the bases for including $98.6 million in New Starts funding in 2008 and the
bases for inclusion the proposed financially constrained MTP given the current
status/position of the SSCP2 in the FTA NS pipeline
BMF:
ID the other local funds.
West SAC LRT Extension:
Please provide the bases for including $154 million in construction dollars in the MTP and
the source of funding for inclusion into the proposed financially constrained MTP
Any questions give me a call
Jerome W
250

Comment:
Jerome Wiggins, Federal Transit Administration
2/21/06
I would recommend SACOG develop a fiscally constrained element of the MTP that is
based on programmed local, regional, state and federal funds as well as discretionary
state and federal funds anticipated to be available over the long term of the MTP
A “Visions” element that refers to new local, regional, state and federal funds that MAY
become available over the near to mid-term of the MTP through voter approval or
legislative action.
In its current form I believe FTA would have some difficulty in making a finding the MTP is
financially constrained and could adversely affect the air quality conformity finding.
Jerome W
251

252

253

254

WHAT WE DO
The Sacramento Area Council
of Governments (SACOG) is an
association of Sacramento
Valley governments formed
from the six regional counties—El
Dorado, Placer,
Sacramento, Sutter, Yolo and
Yuba—and 22 member cities.
SACOG’s directors are chosen
from the elected boards of its
member governments. SACOG’s
primary charge is to provide
regional transportation planning
and funding, as well as a
forum for the study and resolution
of regional issues. In
this role, SACOG prepares the
region’s long-range transportation
plan; approves distribution
of affordable housing
around the region; keeps
a regionwide database for its
own and local agency use;
helps counties and cities use
federal transportation funds in
a timely way; assits in planning
for transit, bicycle networks,
clean air and airport
land uses; and has undertaken
the Blueprint Project to link
transportation and land development
more closely. SACOG
has an annual operating
budget of about $12.8 million,
funded from local,
regional, state and federal
transportation funds. It has a
staff of about 50, including
employees and consultants.
EXECUTIVE
STAFF
Mike McKeever
Executive Director
Peter Hathaway
Director of
Transportation Planning
Kenneth Hough
Director of Community
Planning & Operations
Karen Wilcox
Director of Finance
Gordon Garry
Director of Research
and Analysis
PROJECT
STAFF
Debra Jones
Project Delivery Manager
Jason Crow
Senior Planner
José Luis Cáceres
Planner
Kent Giacomozzi
Graphic Design
Gayle Greene
Administrative Assistant
Jason McNeill
Web Page
Scott Overton
Reprographics
Rebecca Thornton Sloan
Communications

Attachment C
Sacramento
Area
Council of
Governments
1415 L
Street,
Suite 300
Sacramento,
CA
95814
tel: 916.321.9000
fax: 916.321.9551
tdd: 916.321.9550
www.sacog.org
TO: Federal Highway Administration
FROM: Mike McKeever, Executive Director
DATE: April 7, 2006
RE: Air Quality Emissions Conformity Analysis on the 2006 Metropolitan
Transportation Plan (MTP) and the 2006/08 Metropolitan
Transportation Improvement Program (MTIP) for the Sacramento
Ozone (ROG, and NOx), Carbon Monoxide (CO) and Particulate
Matter (PM-10) Air Quality Planning Areas
BACKGROUND: Federal regulations require that the Sacramento Area Council of
Governments (SACOG) prepare Air Quality Conformity Determinations on its
transportation plans and programs. The purpose of the conformity determination is
to ensure that SACOG’s plans and programs "conform" to all applicable federal air
quality requirements. Based on guidance from the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) dated August 15, 1997, and January 2, 2002, conformity
determinations must be based on the most recent estimates of on-road vehicle-based
emissions. The emissions estimates must also be based upon the most recent
population, employment, travel and congestion forecasts from SACOG, acting as
the federally designated Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the
Sacramento region.
SACOG has developed an emissions conformity procedure based on the modeling
requirements contained in the August 15, 1997, Federal Register. These regulations
require us to develop a series of forecasting model runs for the Sacramento air
quality planning areas, using our SACMET Travel Demand models, whenever we
prepare a conformity determination. This model uses estimates of population,
employment, and travel patterns for 2000, as the "Base Year," and future estimates
of these same parameters for a series of future years. The future years are
designated as "milestone" or "horizon" years for certain types of pollutant emissions
under EPA regulations. The Travel Demand Models are used to estimate daily
vehicle miles traveled (VMT), in five-mile-per-hour increments, for each model
run. The total number of trips for each model run is also generated. Daily VMT
and total trips from each model run are then used as inputs to our vehicle-emissions
forecasting model, EMFAC2002 provided by ARB.
DISCUSSION: This memo discusses the results of the emissions analysis for the
2006 MTP and the 2006/08 MTIP for the Sacramento reactive organic gas
(ROG), nitrogen oxide (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), and particulate matter (PM-
10) air quality planning areas.

Federal Highway Administration
Page 2
April 7, 2006
A) SACRAMENTO EMISSIONS CALCULATIONS
The following emissions conformity determinations were based upon VMT assumptions as
approved by the Regional Planning Partnership on May 26, 2005 and subsequently agreed to by
both FHWA and EPA (copies of the memo are available on request). This memo documents the
methodology that was used to develop VMT estimates for the current 8-hour ozone Rate-Of-
Progress State Implementation Plan (ROP/SIP) and for any future conformity determinations
under this ROP/SIP.
In order to prepare an emissions conformity analysis on the 2006 MTP and the 2006/08 MTIP,
SACOG prepares estimates of emissions for the Sacramento air quality planning areas for the
following analysis years: 2008, 2010, 2013, 2018, 2020, and 2027, depending on the pollutant in
question. Estimates of emissions are prepared in accordance with the conformity regulations as
published in the Federal Register on August 15, 1997.
Once the analysis years have been selected, SACOG uses its SACMET travel demand model to
generate daily vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and total trips for each analysis year in question using
population and employment assumptions, as shown in the Table 1. The outputs from the
transportation model are then inputted into a PC-based version of EMFAC2002, as provided to
SACOG by the California Air Resources Board (CARB).
Also included in the emission calculations is credit for NOx emission reductions from on-road mobile
source emissions associated with the Sacramento Emergency Clean Air and Transportation (SECAT)
program. On June 30, 2000, the Governor signed the State budget that included $50 million for the
Sacramento region to fund air quality NOx reduction programs. On May 18, 2000, the SACOG
Board of Directors approved $20 million in Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) funds to
match the governor’s $50 million in general fund revenues. To administer the program, Assembly
Bill 2511 (Assemblyman Steinberg) was signed by the Governor on September 18, 2000, authorizing
the formation of the Sacramento Emergency Clean Air and Transportation (SECAT) Program.
Since September 2000, SACOG has obligated approximately $46 million out of the $70 million SECAT
program. SACOG has submitted an additional allocation request for $13.1 million in SECAT funds that the
California Transportation Commission (CTC) is scheduled to act on at their April 26/27, 2006, meeting.
SACOG anticipates going back to the CTC in the fall of 2006 for the final allocation of approximately $10.5
million in SECAT funds
1) EMISSION FORECASTS FOR THE 2006 MTP FOR THE SACRAMENTO OZONE, CO AND
PM-10 AIR QUALITY PLANNING AREAS
a. Emissions Budget Test For Ozone (ROG and NOx) and Carbon Monoxide (CO)
Under the emissions budget test, all future year ROG and NOx, emissions associated with the 2006
MTP must be equal to or less than the budgets established in the Sacramento Regional Nonattainment
Area 8-Hour Ozone Rate-Of-Progress State Implementation Plan (ROP/SIP) for the Sacramento

Federal Highway Administration
Page 3
April 7, 2006
ozone nonattainment and for CO emissions less than the CO maintenance budgets established in the
2004 Revision to the California State Implementation Plan for Carbon Monoxide, January 30, 2006.
As can be seen from Table 2, ROG, NOx and CO emissions associated with the 2006 MTP are less
than the budgets contained in the SIPs for the Sacramento nonattainment areas for all future years.
Under the conformity regulations, as long as future year emissions associated with the 2006 MTP,
including any amendments, are equal to or less than the budgets contained in the ROP/SIP, we have
met the emissions budget test under the conformity regulations. As can be seen from Table 2, we
have met the budget tests for ROG, NOx and CO emissions.
b. Build vs. No-Build Test For PM-10
Under the Build vs. No-Build test for PM-10, PM-10 emissions must either be less in the future when
compared against the Base Year or less in the “2006 MTP” (MTP) vs. “No-2006 MTP ” (No MTP).
Table 3 shows that PM-10 emissions are projected to increase significantly in future years. The
reason for the increase in PM-10 emissions in the future is because of the methodology used to project
PM-10 emissions. We are required to use EPA’s PM-10 forecasting methodology (AP-42), which
relies solely on daily VMT. With daily VMT projected to increase significantly in the future, so will
PM-10 emissions. However, the conformity test for PM-10 requires that either of two tests be met:
either the “MTP” results in less emissions than the “No-MTP” scenario in future years, or the future
year emissions are less than the 2000 Base Year levels. In our case, the “MTP” yields less PM-10
emissions in the future than the “No-MTP” scenario, so one of the tests is met and, therefore, we have
met the conformity test for PM-10 for the 2006 MTP.
2) EMISSION FORECASTS FOR THE 2006/08 MTIP FOR THE SACRAMENTO OZONE, CO
AND PM-10 AIR QUALITY PLANNING AREAS
a. Emissions Budget Test For Ozone (ROG and NOx) and Carbon Monoxide (CO)
Under the emissions budget test, all future year ROG, NOx, and CO emissions associated with the
2006/08 MTIP must be equal to or less than the budgets established in the SIPs for the Sacramento
ozone nonattainment and CO maintenance areas.
As can be seen from Table 2, ROG, NOx and CO emissions associated with the 2006/08 MTIP are
less than the budgets contained in the SIPs for the Sacramento ozone nonattainment and CO
maintenance areas for all future years. Under the conformity regulations, as long as future year
emissions associated with the 2006/08 MTIP are equal to or less than the budgets contained in the
SIPs, we have met the emissions budget tests under the conformity regulations. As can be seen from
Table 2, we have met the budget tests for ROG, NOx and CO emissions.
b. Build vs No-Build Test For PM-10
Under the Build vs No-Build test for PM-10, PM-10 must either be less in the future when compared
against the 2002 Base Year or less in the “2006/08 MTIP” (MTIP) vs. “No 2006/08 MTIP” (No-

Federal Highway Administration
Page 4
April 7, 2006
MTIP). Table 4 shows that PM-10 emissions are projected to increase significantly in the future. The
reason for the dramatic increase in PM-10 emissions in the future is because of the methodology used
to project PM-10 emissions. We are required to use EPA’s PM-10 forecasting methodology (AP-42),
which relies solely on daily VMT. With daily VMT projected to increase significantly in the future,
so will PM-10 emissions. However, the conformity test for PM-10 requires that either of two tests be
met: either the “2006/08 MTIP” results in less emissions than the “No-MTIP ” scenario in future
years, or the future year emissions are less than the 2002 Base Year levels. In our case, the “MTIP”
yields less PM-10 emissions in the future than the “No-MTIP” scenario, so one of the tests is met and,
therefore, we have met the conformity test for PM-10 for the 2006/08 MTIP.
c. CONCLUSIONS
The results of the emissions analyses shows that the 2006 MTP and the 2006/08 MTIP meet the
emissions conformity tests as outlined in the August 15, 1997, Federal Register notice for both the
Sacramento ozone, carbon monoxide and PM-10 air quality planning areas.
S:\Projects 05-06\0401-AQ Conf\AQ Submittal to Feds\AQ Conformity FHA Memo - Attach C.doc

Sacramento Area
TABLE 1
Population and Employment Assumptions and VMT Estimates
That Were Used to Develop the March 16, 2006
Conformity Determinations
2008 2013 2020 2027
VMT 59,165,000 66,892,000 74,799,000 83,062,000
Trips 12,165,000 13,206,000 14,811,000 16,992,000
Vehicles 1,819,400 2,009,300 2,308,900 2,714,000
Population 2,256,400 2,425,526 2,677,800 2,939,000
Employment 1,140,200 1,243,136 1,358,000 1,467,000

2006 MTP AND
2006/08 MTIP
TABLE 2
ROG, NOx and CO Emissions Budget Tests
for the 2006 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) and
the 2006/08 Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program (MTIP)
for the Sacramento Ozone Nonattainment and Carbon Monoxide Maintenance Areas
TONS PER DAY OF EMISSIONS
2008
OZONE
YEAR
2010
CO BUDGET
YEAR
2013
OZONE
ATTAINMENT
YEAR
2018
CO BUDGET
YEAR
2020
OZONE
MILESTONE YEAR
2027
LAST YER OF
PLAN
Inventories 1
ROG Inventory 39.92 N/A 29.38 N/A 21.20 17.31
Local Adjustments 2 0.96 N/A 0 N/A 0 0
TOTAL ROG 38.96 N/A 29.38 N/A 21.20 17.31
ROG BUDGET 41.00 N/A 41.00 N/A 41.00 41.00
Surplus/(Deficit) 2.04 N/A 11.62 N/A 19.80 23.69
Pass Conformity Test Yes N/A Yes N/A Yes Yes
NOx Inventory 74.68 N/A 50.52 N/A 29.21 20.43
Local Adjustments 2 2.39 N/A 0 N/A 0 0
TOTAL NOx 72.29 N/A 50.52 N/A 29.21 20.43
NOx BUDGET 75.00 N/A 75.00 N/A 75.00 75.00
Surplus/(Deficit) 2.71 N/A 24.48 N/A 45.79 54.57
Pass Conformity Test Yes N/A Yes N/A Yes Yes
TOTAL CO 244.26 226.49 N/A 155.42 N/A 75.46
CO Budget 420.00 420.00 N/A 420.00 N/A 420.00
Surplus/Deficit 175.74 193.51 N/A 264.58 N/A 344.54
Pass Conformity Test Yes Yes N/A Yes N/A Yes
1 MTP/MTIP Inventories include emission forecasts for northern Solano County.
2 Local adjustments for 2008 include state and local measures (SECAT) that were not included in the baseline modeling (see Appendix D of the 2006 ROP/SIP for
additional documentation).

Table 3
PM-10 Build Vs. No-Build Conformity Test for the
2006 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP)
TONS PER DAY OF EMISSIONS
2008 2018 2027
Emission Category No MTP MTP No MTP MTP No MTP MTP
PM-10 7.17 7.16 8.24 8.18 9.21 9.10
Table 4
PM-10 Build Vs. No-Build Conformity Test for the
2006/08 Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program (MTIP)
TONS PER DAY OF EMISSIONS
2008 2018 2027
Emission Category No MTP MTP No MTP MTP No MTP MTP
PM-10 7.17 7.16 8.24 8.18 9.21 9.10
Nonattainment area for PM-10 is Sacramento County only. The Build vs. No-Build Test
is used for PM-10 conformity findings because ARB has not established any PM-10 budgets
for Sacramento County.