19.06.2014 Views

SACOG Conformity Determination

SACOG Conformity Determination

SACOG Conformity Determination

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Sacramento expects to attain federal clean air standards by about 2013. New, harder-to-meet<br />

federal standards (the 8-hour standards) have been approved effective June 2005. The region is<br />

now developing an interim Rate-of-Progress State Implementation Plan for Air Quality (ROP SIP)<br />

that will allow air quality conformity analysis and a finding for this plan. A new, full SIP for the<br />

region will be ready by mid-2007. The Yuba/Sutter air basin is now considered to be in attainment<br />

(except for the Sutter Buttes, which is considered a separate air basin).<br />

Late-model autos are 50 times less polluting than 20-year old models (and new hybrid fuel autos<br />

are better yet), so as older cars are retired to the junkyard, our air will get cleaner. A growing<br />

population slows down progress on air quality, by adding to VMT. Eventually, community design<br />

changes may lead to changes in travel patterns and lower VMT, but not in the short term. Other<br />

ways to cut pollution may be needed in the near term.<br />

FROM RESEARCH ABOUT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF TRANSPORTATION<br />

PLANS, <strong>SACOG</strong> HAS LEARNED THAT:<br />

Natural environmental impacts would not be substantially greater from the projects in the<br />

plans, just different, and can be offset or mitigated for the most part. Impacts from<br />

development far outweigh those from the transportation accompanying it. For example, the projects<br />

in the MTP 2025 would lead to higher noise levels at 24 locations and lower noise levels at five,<br />

but overall road noise would increase anyway from a 58 percent increase in VMT region-wide.<br />

New bridges would affect riparian habitat along the rivers they cross, but so would increased traffic<br />

on existing bridges. Road projects nowadays usually skirt around sensitive sites, and routinely<br />

include mitigation where that is not feasible.<br />

Continuation of recent development trends would place 90 percent of new growth at the<br />

urban edge and consume at least another 100,000 acres for sprawl growth by 2025. Both the<br />

MTP 2025 and the 2006 MTP try to encourage different development patterns. Studies in<br />

Portland, Oregon, a region that has tried hard to control sprawl development, show that jobs move<br />

to the urban edge faster if access to the central business district is choked off by congestion. The<br />

2006 MTP puts investment in a community design program primarily within the existing urban<br />

area. Community design programs show promising results in other cities. <strong>SACOG</strong> expects some<br />

success in reining in urban sprawl, but still expects at least 80 percent of growth to go around the<br />

urban edge.<br />

Community impacts can be significant, and impacts from a 58 percent increase in VMT<br />

region-wide would be substantial in any case. Rail lines and wider roads can divide communities,<br />

but also link those communities to jobs and activities. Widened roads carrying heavy traffic make<br />

impacts on the surrounding community and adjacent properties, but so does traffic cutting through<br />

neighborhoods to dodge congestion on an inadequate main road. The more sprawl development is<br />

reined in, the more traffic will need to use existing roads.<br />

The 2006 MTP offers minimal benefits for either lower-income communities or more affluent<br />

ones. Bus service and community circulator buses provide the most benefit in lower income areas.<br />

Community circulator buses could serve local trips to grocery stores, medical facilities, and other<br />

33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!