SACOG Conformity Determination

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Mr. Gene K. Fong, Mr. Leslie Rogers, Ms. Lisa Hans, and Ms. Jody Jones Page 2 April 7, 2006 Conformity Approach The last conformity determination for the Sacramento ozone nonattainment area, CO attainment area and PM-10 moderate nonattainment area was adopted by the SACOG Board of Directors on November 20, 2002 (93.114). The conformity test for the Sacramento ozone nonattainment, CO attainment, and PM-10 moderate nonattainment area will consist of a quantitative emissions analysis (budget test for ozone and CO and a build vs. no-build test for PM-10), as shown in Attachment C. Plan and MTIP Status The SACOG Board of Directors is scheduled to adopt the 2006 MTP and the 2006/08 MTIP at its March 16, 2006, meeting (93.104). Financial Constraint The 2006 MTP and the 2006/08 MTIP are fiscally constrained consistent with 23 CFR 450 (93.108). Inclusion of All Federal and Non-Federal Regionally Significant Projects The 2006 MTP for 2025 and the 2006/08 MTIP include all federal and non-federal regionally significant projects expected to occur in the Sacramento nonattainment (ozone), maintenance (CO) and moderate (PM-10) areas, along with projects expected to be built in the Yuba/Sutter attainment area [93.122(a)(1)]. Latest Planning Assumptions The emission estimates developed for this conformity determination were based on the latest population and employment projections for the Sacramento and Yuba/Sutter areas that were adopted by the SACOG Board of Directors on December 16, 2004 (93.110). Latest Emissions Model One of the critical inputs into determining emissions associated with the 2006 MTP and the 2006/08 MTIP is the selection of which emissions factors to use. For purposes of this conformity determination, EMFAC 2002 was used, as provided to SACOG by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) along with revised emission factors dated January 24, 2002, which were also provided to SACOG by CARB (93.111). Quantitative emissions analyses have been prepared for the Sacramento nonattainment, maintenance, and moderate areas, as shown in Attachment C.
Mr. Gene K. Fong, Mr. Leslie Rogers, Ms. Lisa Hans, and Ms. Jody Jones Page 3 April 7, 2006 Modeling Documentation A complete description of the Sacramento SACMET model that was used by SACOG to develop the quantitative emissions analyses included with this submittal is available upon request (93.111). Estimates of regional transportation-related emissions for serious, severe, or extreme ozone nonattainment areas that are used to support conformity determinations must be made in accordance with the procedures laid out under section 93.122 (b) (1) through (3) of the August 15, 1997 Federal Register. The Sacramento ozone nonattainment area is currently classified as a moderate ozone nonattainment area. SACOG’s SACMET Travel Demand model, which was used to develop transportation-related emissions for the Sacramento nonattainment areas, currently meets all the modeling requirements, as set forth in the August 15, 1997, Federal Register. The SACMET model was used to develop ROG, NOx and CO emissions for the Sacramento ozone nonattainment and carbon monoxide maintenance areas, respectively. The EPA’s AP-42 emissions model was used to develop PM-10 emissions for the PM-10 nonattainment area (Sacramento County only). Consultation Review of this document is part of the conformity consultation process as required under section 93.105 (a) (2), 93.105 (c) (1), and 93.105 (e) and is consistent with the public involvement procedures under 23 CFR 450 (93.112). This air quality conformity analysis was circulated for thirty days to give all affected parties an opportunity to comment. Copies of all comments, along with our responses, are included in Attachment D. Over the last year, the Regional Planning Partnership (Partnership), a committee established by the SACOG Board of Directors to review all conformity determinations and assumptions, was asked to review and approve a set of assumptions for use in future conformity determinations. Those assumptions have been incorporated into these conformity determinations. Transportation Control Measures SACOG has prepared status reports on the implementation of transportation control measures (TCMs) contained in SACOG’s 1982 Air Quality Plan (AQP) and 15% Rate-Of-Progress (ROP) Plan. These status reports were last submitted with SACOG’s April 28, 1994, conformity submittal that was approved by Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) on August 16, 1994. The information contained in those documents has not changed since that submittal. Therefore, copies of those documents will not be transmitted with this submittal. In summary, the 1987 report written by the EPA concluded "that, in general, most of the agencies that committed to carrying out measures under the 1982 Air Quality Plan (AQP) have fulfilled those commitments and, in many cases, have taken actions which go beyond their 1982 Plan commitments." The EPA did, however, point out that not all measures had been fully implemented by 1987. Since 1987, jurisdictions included in the 1982 AQP have fully
Page 1: Sacramento Area Council of Governme
Page 5 and 6: Mr. Gene K. Fong, Mr. Leslie Rogers
Page 7 and 8: Mr. Gene K. Fong, Mr. Leslie Rogers
Page 9 and 10: CONTENTS 1. A Long-Range Transporta
Page 11 and 12: In July 2005, SACOG approved anothe
Page 13 and 14: communities by heavy local auto tra
Page 15 and 16: • Finally, this plan proposes to
Page 17 and 18: 2. DEVELOPMENT OF METROPOLITAN TRAN
Page 19 and 20: The 2006 MTP is consistent with the
Page 21 and 22: TABLE 1. REGIONAL GROWTH, 2005-2027
Page 23 and 24: to 1.76 million by 2000. In fact, t
Page 25 and 26: 4. MEETING THE PLAN’S GOALS HOW T
Page 27 and 28: 2. ACCESS AND MOBILITY: Improve acc
Page 29 and 30: e in attainment of the 8-hour ozone
Page 31 and 32: and trucks coming from and going to
Page 33 and 34: operations, and between transit and
Page 35 and 36: consensus about the role of transpo
Page 37 and 38: WHAT KINDS OF INFORMATION DO THE TR
Page 39 and 40: The modeling shows that that conges
Page 41 and 42: commuting and community design migh
Page 43 and 44: public services to meet the basic n
Page 45 and 46: 6. THE CONTENTS OF THE 2006 MTP WHA
Page 47 and 48: Table 6. Plan Summary Total Cost: $
Page 49 and 50: • Sunrise Boulevard - Widen Sunri
Page 51 and 52: • Into downtown Sacramento from t
Page 53 and 54:
• Transportation demand managemen
Page 55 and 56:
The MTP 2025 assumed, and the 2006
Page 57 and 58:
Table 8: REVENUE ESTIMATES - SUMMAR
Page 59 and 60:
identified street and road maintena
Page 61 and 62:
1. Implementation of the MTPs -- By
Page 63 and 64:
• Continue corridor studies to de
Page 65 and 66:
edevelopment programs, private deve
Page 67 and 68:
ADA Requirements All ADA requiremen
Page 69 and 70:
programs combined with other SACOG-
Page 71 and 72:
detailed under the individual progr
Page 73 and 74:
I. PROGRAM GOALS AND OBJECTIVES The
Page 75 and 76:
K. PROJECT SPONSORSHIP Public agenc
Page 77 and 78:
eview the recommendations from the
Page 79 and 80:
• Are there leveraged, private de
Page 81 and 82:
Structure: Build a two-level parkin
Page 83 and 84:
County of Sacramento with numerous
Page 85 and 86:
SAC24071 Elk Grove ITS Phase 1 Impl
Page 87 and 88:
consistent with regional targets fo
Page 89 and 90:
nationwide bus replacement funds. T
Page 91 and 92:
at ¼ percent from 2016 to 2027 yie
Page 93 and 94:
APPENDIX E LISTING OF PROJECTS AND
Page 95 and 96:
Appendix E Project List ID Project
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
APPENDIX F INTER-REGIONAL PASSENGER
Page 119 and 120:
APPENDIX G FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION T
Page 121 and 122:
• Approximate Total - $130-164,00
Page 123 and 124:
emote locations could also result i
Page 125 and 126:
To carry out these functions, the A
Page 127 and 128:
AVIATION ISSUES The Aviation Issues
Page 129 and 130:
provided such increases do not put
Page 131 and 132:
Based upon the level of operations
Page 133 and 134:
CONGESTION MONITORING AND PERFORMAN
Page 135 and 136:
• Enhance congestion monitoring b
Page 137 and 138:
location of these incidents makes t
Page 139 and 140:
APPENDIX K REFERENCES (in chronolog
Page 141:
APPENDIX L IRR TIP PROJECT Projects
Page 146 and 147:
APPENDIX N KEY EXCERPTS FROM THE 20
Page 148 and 149:
nto Area f ents 1415 L Street, Suit
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Mr. Gene K. Fong, Mr. Leslie Rogers
Page 158 and 159:
Mr. Gene K. Fong, Mr. Leslie Rogers
Page 173 and 174:
Sacramento Metropolitan Planning Ar
Page 175 and 176:
Winters Wheatland §¨¦ !" 80 99 A
Page 177 and 178:
P r o j e c t s — 2 0 0 6 M e t r
Page 179 and 180:
SACOG-06-010 Metropolitan Transport
Page 183 and 184:
Sacramento Area Council of Governme
Page 185 and 186:
INTRODUCTION The 2006/08 Metropolit
Page 187 and 188:
project or continue to the next pha
Page 189 and 190:
would normally require a formal ame
Page 191 and 192:
SECTION 2: FINANCIAL ELEMENT 11
Page 193 and 194:
SECTION 3: 2006/08 METROPOLITAN TRA
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256:
Page 257 and 258:
Page 259 and 260:
Page 261 and 262:
Page 263 and 264:
Page 265 and 266:
Page 267 and 268:
Page 269 and 270:
Page 271 and 272:
Page 273 and 274:
Page 275 and 276:
Page 277 and 278:
Page 279 and 280:
Page 281 and 282:
Page 283 and 284:
Page 285 and 286:
Page 287 and 288:
Page 289 and 290:
Page 291 and 292:
Page 293 and 294:
Page 295 and 296:
Page 297 and 298:
Page 299 and 300:
Page 301 and 302:
Page 303 and 304:
Page 305 and 306:
Page 307 and 308:
Page 309 and 310:
Page 311 and 312:
Page 313 and 314:
Page 315 and 316:
Page 317 and 318:
Page 319 and 320:
Page 321 and 322:
Page 323 and 324:
Page 325 and 326:
Page 327 and 328:
Page 329 and 330:
Page 331 and 332:
Page 333 and 334:
Page 335 and 336:
SECTION 4 STATUS OF PROJECTS FROM P
Page 337 and 338:
Page 339 and 340:
Page 341 and 342:
Page 343 and 344:
Page 345 and 346:
Page 347 and 348:
Page 349 and 350:
Page 351 and 352:
Page 353 and 354:
Page 355 and 356:
SACOG ID VAR55000 Lead Agency Sacra
Page 357 and 358:
Page 359 and 360:
Page 361 and 362:
Page 363 and 364:
Page 365 and 366:
Page 367 and 368:
Page 369 and 370:
Page 371 and 372:
Page 373 and 374:
Page 375 and 376:
Page 377 and 378:
Page 379 and 380:
Page 381 and 382:
Page 383 and 384:
Page 385 and 386:
Page 387 and 388:
Page 389 and 390:
Page 391 and 392:
Page 393 and 394:
Page 395 and 396:
SECTION 5 GROUPED PROJECT LISTING:
Page 397 and 398:
Grouped Project Detailed Listing LU
Page 399 and 400:
LUMP SUM Grouped Project Detailed L
Page 401 and 402:
2004/2005 Highway Bridge Program Th
Page 403 and 404:
2004/2005 Highway Bridge Program Th
Page 405 and 406:
2005/2006 HES PROGRAM PLAN - WORK T
Page 407 and 408:
GLOSSARY OF TERMS AND ACRONYMS USED
Page 409 and 410:
transit capital and operating expen
Page 411 and 412:
SHOPP: State Highway Operation and
Page 413 and 414:
APPENDIX A: EXPEDITED PROJECT SELEC
Page 415 and 416:
235
Page 417 and 418:
237
Page 419 and 420:
239
Page 421 and 422:
Project Eligibility Determination f
Page 423 and 424:
APPENDIX C: MAP OF THE SACRAMENTO M
Page 425 and 426:
APPENDIX D: INDIAN RESERVATION ROAD
Page 427 and 428:
SACOG ID IRR38300 El Dorado County
Page 429 and 430:
Comment: Jerome Wiggins, Federal Tr
Page 431 and 432:
Comment: Jerome Wiggins, Federal Tr
Page 433 and 434:
253
Page 435 and 436:
WHAT WE DO The Sacramento Area Coun
Page 437 and 438:
Federal Highway Administration Page
Page 439 and 440:
Federal Highway Administration Page
Page 441 and 442:
2006 MTP AND 2006/08 MTIP TABLE 2 R
show all

SACOG Conformity Determination

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?