19.06.2014 Views

SACOG Conformity Determination

SACOG Conformity Determination

SACOG Conformity Determination

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5. COMPARING ALTERNATIVE TRANSPORTATION FUTURES<br />

HOW DOES <strong>SACOG</strong> ANALYZE AND COMPARE ALTERNATIVE FUTURES?<br />

In developing an MTP, <strong>SACOG</strong> uses travel demand models to examine how the<br />

transportation system works, now and in the future, under alternative scenarios. Modeling is<br />

also used to project harmful air emissions for air quality conformity purposes.<br />

Transportation models run on a computer, making millions of calculations quickly. In simplest<br />

terms, the models add up the travel behavior of all of the people in the Sacramento region<br />

and explain how that affects the transportation system. Models can provide information about<br />

travel today, and forecast travel in the future, but do not make decisions. A brief summary of how<br />

<strong>SACOG</strong>'s two models work can be found in the Appendix J. Modeling assumptions are found in<br />

Appendix D.<br />

<strong>SACOG</strong> also uses data, research, and mapping to look at the impacts of the transportation<br />

system on surrounding communities and the natural environment. A summary of the<br />

community and environmental impacts of the MTP 2025 is found below; those wanting more<br />

information on these impacts should refer to the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) accompanying<br />

the MTP 2025 and the Addendum to the EIR developed for this 2006 MTP.<br />

WHAT ALTERNATIVE FUTURES WERE CONSIDERED?<br />

In preparing the MTP 2025, the Roundtable developed study alternatives that separately<br />

emphasized transit, roads, and community design, comparing those to each other and to the existing<br />

1999 MTP. The resulting preferred alternative was a hybrid that performed better on many<br />

measures than the 1999 MTP.<br />

In this plan, two alternative transportation futures were compared -- the MTP 2025 and the 2006<br />

MTP. Here is how they are different:<br />

• The timeframe for the MTP 2025 was 2002-2025 and the timeframe for the 2006 MTP is<br />

2006-2027.<br />

• The 2006 MTP project list is the same as the MTP 2025 project list except for projects that<br />

have been built since 2002, and therefore eliminated, and a few new projects that have been<br />

added. These new projects are largely developer-built serving areas that were indicated for<br />

development in the MTP 2025, where development has progressed to the point that actual<br />

roads are now designated.<br />

• Some projects have changed in scope or cost since the MTP 2025 was completed, but the<br />

changes are minor.<br />

27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!