21.06.2014 Views

A General Purpose Fiber-Optic Hydrophone Made of Castable Epoxy

A General Purpose Fiber-Optic Hydrophone Made of Castable Epoxy

A General Purpose Fiber-Optic Hydrophone Made of Castable Epoxy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The inner core was placed in a lucite mold which could then be filled with epoxy to form the capsule.<br />

After the epoxy had cured, the capsule was removed from the mold and the two machine screws were<br />

removed from the capsule. The capsule was then placed in a vacuum oven and heated for approximately<br />

twelve hours at 500 C to remove the wax and post-cure the epoxy. Before encapsulation, both screw holes<br />

were filled with epoxy, but at this stage only one hole was filled so that the other hole could be used to<br />

connect the capsule to a vacuum rig for static pressure sensitivity calibration. A photograph <strong>of</strong> the<br />

completed capsule is shown as Figure 7.<br />

4. HYDROPHONE CALIBRATION AND COMPARISON TO THEORY<br />

The results reported in this section were obtained by the comparison technique39 in air and in water<br />

near atmospheric pressure in the calibrators which were small compared to the acoustic wavelengths <strong>of</strong><br />

interest since the hydrophone was compact'0 (i.e., small compared to the wavelengths <strong>of</strong> interest) and its<br />

response is expected to be omnidirectional The hydrophone was tested in water over the range <strong>of</strong><br />

temperatures from 7.5 °C to 45 °C, at ambient pressure.<br />

The acoustical and vibration sensitivities were measured by a fixed phase shift techniquel8 which<br />

involved the adjustment <strong>of</strong> a sinusoidal excitation (acoustic pressure or acceleration) until the output <strong>of</strong> the<br />

interferometer, observed on an oscilloscope, corresponded to an identifiable amount <strong>of</strong> optical phase shift<br />

(integer multiples <strong>of</strong> 2it radians per half-cycle <strong>of</strong> excitation). This technique can provide results which<br />

were accurate to better than and agreed with the Bessel function zero-crossing technique4'5 also to<br />

better than 1 %. The results reported here are therefore demodulator independent. The normalized<br />

sensitivity, M, was obtained from the measured sensitivities by subtracting 20 log10 (2nkL) from the<br />

measured sensitivities expressed in decibels. The factor <strong>of</strong> two appears due to the "double pass" in a<br />

Michelson interferometer. For this hydrophone, n = 1.48, A = 830 nm, and L = 9.0 m, which<br />

corresponds to a normalization factor is 166 dB.<br />

4 . 1 Comparison Calibration Standards<br />

Measurements <strong>of</strong> acoustic pressure sensitivity in air were made between 60 Hz and 900Hz using a 1-<br />

inch laboratory standard condenser microphone (Brüel & Kjer Model 4132, S/N 172894) as a transfer<br />

standard. The calibration <strong>of</strong> this microphone with its associated pre-amplifier (Brüel & Kjer Model<br />

2660), cable, and power supply (BrUel & Kjer Model 2807) was checked using a pistonphone (Brüel &<br />

Kjer Model 4220) for acoustic calibration prior to and immediately after use. This calibration was verified<br />

with a high precision reciprocity calibration <strong>of</strong> the 1-inch microphone using the BrUel & Kjer Type 4143<br />

Reciprocity Calibration Apparatus and two additional BrUel & Kjar 1-inch reference microphones. The<br />

measured sensitivity was 48.3 mV/Pa.<br />

Measurements <strong>of</strong> acceleration sensitivity were made between 40 Hz and 1 kHz using a piezoelectric<br />

accelerometer (BrUel & Kjar Type 4382) followed by a voltage pre-amplifier (Ithaco Model 1201). The<br />

calibration <strong>of</strong> the accelerometer, cable, and amplifier were checked 159 Hz using a calibration exciter<br />

(Brüel & Kjar Type 4294) which was itself check by comparison to the "chatter" method based on the<br />

magnitude if the Earth's gravitational acceleration41. The two calibrations were found to agree to within<br />

2%.<br />

22 / SPIE Vol. 1367 <strong>Fiber</strong> <strong>Optic</strong> and Laser Sensors VIII (1990)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!