21.06.2014 Views

A General Purpose Fiber-Optic Hydrophone Made of Castable Epoxy

A General Purpose Fiber-Optic Hydrophone Made of Castable Epoxy

A General Purpose Fiber-Optic Hydrophone Made of Castable Epoxy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

C. 5<br />

C-.<br />

Ct<br />

D.. —<br />

P<br />

><br />

C.3—<br />

am 4t am ,v,. - -<br />

cL 'p w'<br />

Cs)<br />

a)<br />

Li)<br />

0<br />

0.2<br />

U)<br />

C<br />

0<br />

100<br />

Freouenc, hertz<br />

DOD<br />

Fig. 8 Measured acoustic sensitivity <strong>of</strong> the hydrophone capsule in air and water. The solid line represents<br />

a best fit to the measured data and has a value <strong>of</strong> 0.277 0.005 rad/Pa. The water measurements are<br />

represented by the filled circles and were made at 23° C. The air measurements are represented by the<br />

open diamonds and were made at 22° C.<br />

4 . 4 Temperature Coefficient <strong>of</strong> Acoustic Sensitivity<br />

The hydrophone capsule was calibrated in water over the temperature range from 7.5° C to 45° C<br />

(45.5° F to 1 1 3° F) and the sensitivity was found to change at the rate <strong>of</strong> +1 .1% /°C . That is, the<br />

sensitivity <strong>of</strong> the capsule increases with increasing temperature (+0. 10 dB/°C). This result includes the<br />

correction for the temperature coefficient <strong>of</strong> the sensitivity <strong>of</strong> the Bruel and Kjer Type 8103 which is given<br />

by the manufacturer as -0.03 dB/°C.<br />

Based on the modulus measurements <strong>of</strong> the epoxy18'23 shown in Table 1, one would expect a<br />

temperature coefficient <strong>of</strong> acoustic sensitivity that was equal to the measured temperature coefficient <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Young's modulus which was only +0.4 %/°C. In an attempt to check this result, the temperature<br />

coefficient <strong>of</strong> the elastic moduli were remeasured using a variation <strong>of</strong> technique and reaffirmed the original<br />

results.<br />

At the present time, the best available explanation for this discrepency is that the temperature<br />

dependance <strong>of</strong> the Young's modulus <strong>of</strong> the epoxy also effected the boundary conditions (and the<br />

resonance frequency) and therefore had a greater effect than would be predicted from consideration <strong>of</strong><br />

equations (1) or (2). The finite element model in Figure 5a tends to reinforce this hypothesis since the<br />

elastic response <strong>of</strong> the junction <strong>of</strong> the two plates is clearly also flexing. Further studies will be attempted<br />

to resolve and quantify this discrepancy.<br />

24 / SPIE Vol. 1367 <strong>Fiber</strong> <strong>Optic</strong> and Laser Sensors V/li (1990)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!