24.07.2014 Views

COMPIT 2010 in Gubbio - TUHH

COMPIT 2010 in Gubbio - TUHH

COMPIT 2010 in Gubbio - TUHH

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Optimisation of S<strong>in</strong>gle and Multi-Component Propulsors<br />

Markus Druckenbrod, Jochen Hundemer, Moustafa Abdel-Maksoud, TU Hamburg-Harburg,<br />

Hamburg/Germany, m.abdel-maksoud@tu-harburg.de<br />

Max Steden, Howaldtswerke-Deutsche Werft GmbH (HDW), Kiel/Germany<br />

Abstract<br />

The paper describes the optimisation of a conventional propeller and a multi-component propulsor.<br />

The last one can be used to satisfy high acoustic requirements. Both propulsors are optimised<br />

concern<strong>in</strong>g efficiency and cavitation behaviour for a ship with a given resistance at a ship speed of 20<br />

knots. As thrust-fluctuations of a s<strong>in</strong>gle blade can cause vibration and acoustic emissions, the<br />

optimisation criteria is extended to <strong>in</strong>clude the m<strong>in</strong>imisation of the amplitude of the unsteady blade<br />

thrust force dur<strong>in</strong>g one revolution <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>vestigated wake field.<br />

1. Introduction<br />

Modern ships require efficient propulsors with low sensitivity to cavitation with<strong>in</strong> their operation<br />

range. Up to a certa<strong>in</strong> ship speed the mostly used propulsor is the conventional propeller which<br />

reaches high efficiencies, but encounters cavitation problems at high speeds. One of the most common<br />

propulsors for high ship speeds is the waterjet, with good performance characteristics at high speeds<br />

on the one hand but with a significantly decreas<strong>in</strong>g efficiency at low velocities on the other hand. Kim<br />

(2006) shows typical propulsive efficiencies of the mentioned propulsors and also of super-cavitat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

and surface-pierc<strong>in</strong>g propellers. The latter two propulsors are not treated here, as they are just feasible<br />

for small ships.<br />

Between the operational speed ranges of conventional propellers and waterjet propulsors there is a<br />

field, where multi-component-propulsors appear to be advantageous. Such a propulsor, sometimes<br />

also called pumpjet or l<strong>in</strong>earjet, is called multi-component-propulsor <strong>in</strong> the present study. It consists<br />

of the four components, Figs.1 and 2: rotor, hub, duct and stator.<br />

Fig.1: Five-bladed multi-component propulsor<br />

Fig.2: Seven-bladed multi-component propulsor<br />

In a certa<strong>in</strong> way, a multi-component-propulsor can be treated as a comb<strong>in</strong>ation of a conventional<br />

propeller and a waterjet. The water passes through the propulsor without be<strong>in</strong>g lifted to a higher level<br />

as <strong>in</strong> the case of the waterjet. Therefore the theoretically atta<strong>in</strong>able efficiency of a multi-component-<br />

30

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!