Consolidated profit and loss account - Stagecoach Group
Consolidated profit and loss account - Stagecoach Group
Consolidated profit and loss account - Stagecoach Group
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Notes to the <strong>account</strong>s 2003<br />
Note 13 Fixed asset investments (continued)<br />
The principal associate is: Country of Number of Nominal value of % held at<br />
operation shares in issue share capital 30 April 2003<br />
at 30 April 2003<br />
in issue<br />
at 30 April 2003<br />
Road King Infrastructure Limited<br />
China<br />
^ ordinary shares 515.6m HK$51.6m 25.2<br />
^ preference shares 0.4m HK$0.04m 100.0<br />
The market value of the <strong>Group</strong>’s ordinary share investment in Road King Infrastructure Limited, a Bermudan incorporated company, listed<br />
on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, at 30 April 2003 was HK$480.2m (»38.5m) (2002 ^ HK$392.6m (»34.5m)). In February 2002, the <strong>Group</strong><br />
converted 100,000 of its 518,380 7.5% HK$1,000 convertible preference shares in Road King Infrastructure Limited to ordinary shares. The<br />
remaining 418,380 preference shares were converted on 12 June 2003 which resulted in us having a 31.2% interest in Road King’s ordinary<br />
shares. The equivalent market value of the <strong>Group</strong>’s ordinary share investment in Road King post-conversion of the preference shares would<br />
be HK$661.1m (»53.0m). This calculation uses the market value of Road King’s shares at 30 April 2003 <strong>and</strong> the exchange rate prevailing at<br />
that date. The coupon received on the preference shares has been included in the share of associates’ operating <strong>profit</strong>s. The <strong>Group</strong>’s share of<br />
operating <strong>profit</strong> is based on the most recent publicly available information, being the results for the year ended 31 December 2002.<br />
The carrying value of the <strong>Group</strong>’s interest in Road King Infrastructure Limited as at 30 April 2003 was »62.0m.<br />
The principal joint ventures are: Country of Number of Nominal value of % held at<br />
incorporation/ shares in issue share capital 30 April 2003<br />
operation at 30 April 2003 in issue<br />
at 30 April 2003<br />
Virgin Rail <strong>Group</strong> Holdings Limited United Kingdom 34.8m »3.5m 49<br />
Trainline Holdings Limited United Kingdom 3.4m »3.4m 49<br />
Virgin Rail <strong>Group</strong> Holdings Limited is the holding company of Virgin Rail <strong>Group</strong> Limited, which in turn is the holding company of<br />
CrossCountry Trains Limited <strong>and</strong> West Coast Trains Limited. Trainline Holdings Limited is the holding company of thetrainline.com Limited.<br />
The Virgin Rail <strong>Group</strong> Holdings <strong>and</strong> Trainline Holdings shareholders’ agreements provide for joint decision making on key matters <strong>and</strong> equal<br />
representation on the Boards of both companies. As a consequence the investments have been <strong>account</strong>ed for as joint ventures. As part of<br />
the original acquisition, the <strong>Group</strong> acquired a »20m shareholder loan to Virgin Rail <strong>Group</strong> Limited, now a subsidiary of Virgin Rail <strong>Group</strong><br />
Holdings Limited. The shareholder loan carries a 10% coupon <strong>and</strong> »10m was repaid on 28 April 2000.<br />
Virgin Rail <strong>Group</strong> Limited is restricted from paying dividends until any shareholders loans payable by it have been repaid. Under an<br />
agreement with the UK’s Strategic Rail Authority (‘‘SRA’’), Virgin Rail <strong>Group</strong> Limited, CrossCountry Trains Limited <strong>and</strong> West Coast Trains<br />
Limited may not pay dividends prior to 1 March 2004.<br />
As at 30 April 2002, the <strong>Group</strong> undertook an impairment review of its investment in Virgin Rail <strong>Group</strong> in accordance with FRS 11. The<br />
directors concluded, at that time, no impairment write-down was required. However, for each of the five years following the initial<br />
impairment review, the <strong>Group</strong> is required to review its initial projections in light of the actual cash flows. The <strong>Group</strong> has therefore<br />
reviewed the projections made in connection with the 30 April 2002 impairment review. This indicated that the actual net cash flows<br />
earned by the <strong>Group</strong> from its investment in Virgin Rail <strong>Group</strong> during the year ended 30 April 2003 were in line with those projected.<br />
Virgin Rail <strong>Group</strong>’s two train franchises are presently operating with subsidy from the SRA on the basis of a one-year budget set by the<br />
SRA. The value of the <strong>Group</strong>’s investment in Virgin Rail <strong>Group</strong> depends on the agreement of long-term commercial arrangements with the<br />
SRA for the operation of Virgin Rail <strong>Group</strong>’s two franchises. Virgin Rail <strong>Group</strong> has not yet agreed terms for the long-term operation of the<br />
franchises <strong>and</strong> it is not known with certainty when these arrangements will be agreed. In addition, Virgin Rail <strong>Group</strong> continues to be<br />
significantly impacted by the performance of Network Rail. Network Rail is contractually responsible for upgrading certain railway<br />
infrastructure, on which the future revenue growth of Virgin Rail <strong>Group</strong>’s train operations is dependent.<br />
The directors believe that these uncertainties give rise to a need to undertake a fresh impairment review as at 30 April 2003.<br />
In accordance with FRS 11, we have compared the carrying value of our net investment in Virgin Rail <strong>Group</strong>, with its estimated recoverable<br />
amount, being the higher of net realisable value <strong>and</strong> value in use.<br />
The <strong>Group</strong> has conducted this fresh review with reference to the terms agreed between Virgin Rail <strong>Group</strong> <strong>and</strong> the SRA on 19 July 2002 for<br />
the future operation of the two franchises. There remains uncertainty over the timing of agreeing new long-term commercial arrangements<br />
for each franchise <strong>and</strong> also around the level of shareholder return that will be achievable under such arrangements. The SRA has the right<br />
to offer the CrossCountry franchise for competitive tender <strong>and</strong> this presents a further uncertainty. However, to date, the SRA has not<br />
indicated that it intends to exercise this right. In conducting the impairment review as at 30 April 2003, the directors have made best<br />
estimates of future cash flows to the expected end of the two franchises in 2012 after taking <strong>account</strong> of these factors. Any estimation of<br />
value in use is subjective because it is based on estimates of future cash flows. Actual results can differ from those assumed <strong>and</strong> there can<br />
be no absolute assurance that the assumptions used will hold true.<br />
56