04.09.2014 Views

Petition for Writ of Mandamus - Filed - Supreme Court of Texas

Petition for Writ of Mandamus - Filed - Supreme Court of Texas

Petition for Writ of Mandamus - Filed - Supreme Court of Texas

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

merely requires that a classification be rationally related to a legitimate state purpose. Hurt, 110<br />

S.W.2d at 900-01; Tex. Co. v. Stephens, 103 S.W. 481, 484-85 (Tex. 1907). However, the<br />

standard <strong>of</strong> reasonableness <strong>for</strong> a franchise tax is different.<br />

12. The <strong>Texas</strong> franchise tax is a tax on the value <strong>of</strong> the privilege <strong>of</strong> doing business in<br />

<strong>Texas</strong> (the "Privilege") and is intended to exact a tax commensurate with the value <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Privilege. Bullock v. Nat'l Bancshares Corp„ 584 S.W.2d 268, 270 (Tex. 1979); Gen. Dynamics<br />

Corp. v. Bullock, 547 S.W.2d 255, 257 (Tex. 1976). The franchise tax is imposed on entities that<br />

are created by state law and that enjoy the Privilege, such as corporations and limited<br />

partnerships, and is not imposed on entities that are not creatures <strong>of</strong> state law and that do not<br />

enjoy the Privilege, such as sole proprietorships and general partnerships.<br />

See TEX. TAX CODE<br />

ANN. §§ 171.0002 and 171.001(a). The State <strong>of</strong> <strong>Texas</strong> will revoke the Privilege from a state law<br />

entity that does not pay the franchise tax. Id, §§ 171.251-.2515 and 171.301-.3015.<br />

13, Because the franchise tax is imposed in exchange <strong>for</strong> the Privilege and is intended<br />

to be commensurate with the value <strong>of</strong> the Privilege, the Equal and Uni<strong>for</strong>m Clause requires any<br />

tax classifications within the franchise tax to be reasonably related to that value, and not merely<br />

to any conceivable state purpose. In order <strong>for</strong> the tax to be commensurate with the value <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Privilege, the value must generally be ascertained by the same standard <strong>for</strong> all taxpayers.<br />

See<br />

Bullock v. Sage Energy Co., 728 S.W.2d 465, 468 (Tex. App.—Austin 1987, writ ref d n.r.e.)<br />

(citing Lively v, Mo,, K & T Ry, Co, <strong>of</strong> <strong>Texas</strong>,<br />

120 S.W. 852, 856 (Tex. 1909)). Any<br />

classifications among taxpayers must reasonably relate to the value <strong>of</strong> the Privilege.<br />

14. Classifications within the Margin Tax calculation do not reasonably relate to the<br />

value <strong>of</strong> the Privilege.<br />

15. The calculations <strong>of</strong> total revenue, COGS, and compensation, and the<br />

- 4 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!