Petition for Writ of Mandamus - Filed - Supreme Court of Texas
Petition for Writ of Mandamus - Filed - Supreme Court of Texas
Petition for Writ of Mandamus - Filed - Supreme Court of Texas
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
§ 171.1012(k), (k-1). Other taxpayers that exercise the same Privilege as these favored<br />
businesses, and that incur interest expense and expenses <strong>of</strong> leasing, are not allowed the same<br />
deductions. Consequently, the calculation <strong>of</strong> COGS results in an amount <strong>of</strong> COGS that is<br />
unreasonable, arbitrary, and capricious among taxpayers exercising the Privilege,<br />
18. Finally, the calculation <strong>of</strong> compensation under Section 171.1013 allows<br />
deductions <strong>for</strong> expenses associated with employees but not expenses associated with independent<br />
contractors and limits the amount <strong>of</strong> the compensation deduction <strong>for</strong> employees. However,<br />
taxpayers whose workers are employees enjoy the same Privilege as taxpayers whose workers<br />
are independent contractors, and the value <strong>of</strong> that Privilege is not changed by a worker's status as<br />
an employee or an independent contractor or the amount <strong>of</strong> an employee's compensation.<br />
Consequently, the calculation <strong>of</strong> compensation results in an amount <strong>of</strong> compensation that is<br />
unreasonable, arbitrary, and capricious among taxpayers exercising the Privilege.<br />
19. As a result <strong>of</strong> the differences in total revenue, COGS, and compensation, the<br />
Margin Tax calculation does not ascertain the value <strong>of</strong> the privilege <strong>of</strong> doing business in <strong>Texas</strong><br />
the same way <strong>for</strong> all taxpayers—it is not uni<strong>for</strong>m. A dollar <strong>of</strong> income earned from exercising the<br />
Privilege, regardless <strong>of</strong> the source <strong>of</strong> the income, has the same value to all taxpayers. A dollar <strong>of</strong><br />
expense incurred in exercising the Privilege, regardless <strong>of</strong> the nature <strong>of</strong> the expense, has the<br />
same value to all taxpayers. See Bullock v. Sage Energy Co., 728 S.W.2d 465, 468 (Tex. App.—<br />
Austin 1987, writ red n.r.e.). In calculating a franchise tax that is commensurate with the value<br />
<strong>of</strong> that Privilege, it is not reasonable to restrict some deductions <strong>for</strong> income and expense items<br />
only to some taxpayers who exercise that Privilege. To the extent the Legislature does allow<br />
exclusions and deductions from the franchise tax base, those exclusions and deductions must be<br />
available to all taxpayers in order <strong>for</strong> the franchise tax calculation to bear a reasonable<br />
- 6 -