04.09.2014 Views

Petition for Writ of Mandamus - Filed - Supreme Court of Texas

Petition for Writ of Mandamus - Filed - Supreme Court of Texas

Petition for Writ of Mandamus - Filed - Supreme Court of Texas

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

§ 171.1012(k), (k-1). Other taxpayers that exercise the same Privilege as these favored<br />

businesses, and that incur interest expense and expenses <strong>of</strong> leasing, are not allowed the same<br />

deductions. Consequently, the calculation <strong>of</strong> COGS results in an amount <strong>of</strong> COGS that is<br />

unreasonable, arbitrary, and capricious among taxpayers exercising the Privilege,<br />

18. Finally, the calculation <strong>of</strong> compensation under Section 171.1013 allows<br />

deductions <strong>for</strong> expenses associated with employees but not expenses associated with independent<br />

contractors and limits the amount <strong>of</strong> the compensation deduction <strong>for</strong> employees. However,<br />

taxpayers whose workers are employees enjoy the same Privilege as taxpayers whose workers<br />

are independent contractors, and the value <strong>of</strong> that Privilege is not changed by a worker's status as<br />

an employee or an independent contractor or the amount <strong>of</strong> an employee's compensation.<br />

Consequently, the calculation <strong>of</strong> compensation results in an amount <strong>of</strong> compensation that is<br />

unreasonable, arbitrary, and capricious among taxpayers exercising the Privilege.<br />

19. As a result <strong>of</strong> the differences in total revenue, COGS, and compensation, the<br />

Margin Tax calculation does not ascertain the value <strong>of</strong> the privilege <strong>of</strong> doing business in <strong>Texas</strong><br />

the same way <strong>for</strong> all taxpayers—it is not uni<strong>for</strong>m. A dollar <strong>of</strong> income earned from exercising the<br />

Privilege, regardless <strong>of</strong> the source <strong>of</strong> the income, has the same value to all taxpayers. A dollar <strong>of</strong><br />

expense incurred in exercising the Privilege, regardless <strong>of</strong> the nature <strong>of</strong> the expense, has the<br />

same value to all taxpayers. See Bullock v. Sage Energy Co., 728 S.W.2d 465, 468 (Tex. App.—<br />

Austin 1987, writ red n.r.e.). In calculating a franchise tax that is commensurate with the value<br />

<strong>of</strong> that Privilege, it is not reasonable to restrict some deductions <strong>for</strong> income and expense items<br />

only to some taxpayers who exercise that Privilege. To the extent the Legislature does allow<br />

exclusions and deductions from the franchise tax base, those exclusions and deductions must be<br />

available to all taxpayers in order <strong>for</strong> the franchise tax calculation to bear a reasonable<br />

- 6 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!