Technical Guide to EcoSan Promotion

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Improved crop production is noted when one drum of urine collected per week in school units and 20 litres per week in household units are used. Urine fertilized fields have better yields and are not infested with pests. One person generates enough fertilizer to produce 250 kg of cereals per yr.
Technical Guide to EcoSan Promotion References Arnold (2008). Finance for Sanitation - Financial benefits and limits of the EcoSan toilet in Kenya, unpublished study works Conant, J. (2005). Sanitation and Cleanliness for a Healthy Environment. Hesperian Foundation, UNDP, Sida. Conant, J. (2005). Sanitation and Cleanliness for a Healthy Environment, Hesperian Foundation, UNDP, Sida. Costford (2007). Cost Effective Construction Technology at COSTFORD. Available at: http://59.92.116.99/website/RDC/docsweb/Booklet-Laurie%20Baker/3.The % 20 Legacy /3c- Cost % 20 effective % 20 construction % 20 technology .pdf. Last reviewed October 11, 2008 VinnerÂs, B. Jˆnsson, H. Salomon, E. and Stintzing, A.R. 2003. Tentative guidelines for agricultural urine and faeces in Ecosan – closing the loop. Proceedings of the 2nd international symposium on ecological sanitation, incorporating the 1st IWA specialist group conference on sustainable sanitation, 7th – 11th April 2003, L¸beck, Germany. Oduor A.R. and Malesu M.M. 2005. Managing Water for Food Self-sufficiency. Summary of seminar proceedings for World Vision Staff. Nairobi, Kenya. Tilley, Elizabeth et al, 2008. Compendium of Sanitation Systems and Technologies. Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (Eawag). D¸bendorf, Switzerland. Esrey, Steven A., Andersson, Ingvar et al. (2003). Closing the Loop – Ecological sanitation for food security. Schertenleib R. and Morel A. (2003). The Household-Centred Environmental Sanitation Approach (HCES). Paper presented at the 3rd World Water Forum, Kyoto, 16 – 23 March 2003. Swiss Federal Institute for Environmental Science and Technology (EAWAG), Water and Sanitation in Developing Countries (SANDEC), D¸bendorf, Switzerland. WHO and UNICEF (2006). Meeting the MDG Drinking Water and Sanitation Target. The Urban and Rural Challenge of the Decade. Geneva, Switzerland. Otieno M. O., Elisabeth V.M., Arnold K., and Gert B. 2010. Viability of ecological sanitation in urban areas in Kenya -a case study of Nakuru town. Nieuwehaven Gouda and UNESCO- IHE, Delft, The Netherlands. Odhiambo, J. O., Martinsson, E., Soren, S., Mboya, P. and Onyango, J. 2008. Integrated water, energy and sanitation solution for stand alone settlements, Conference on Water and Sanitation in International Development and Disaster Relief. University of Edinburg in Edinburg, UK 2008, http://www2.gtz.de/dokumente/oe44/ecosan/nl/en-kenia-standalone-settlement-iwess-gtz-paper- 2008.pdf. 87
Page 1:
Technical Guide to EcoSan Promotion
Page 4 and 5:
Cataloguing-in-publication data Pub
Page 6 and 7:
Preface The EcoSan Promotion Projec
Page 8 and 9:
Acronyms ABR BC BDBR BOD COD DTS Ec
Page 10 and 11:
3.3.2 Current design and costs of U
Page 12 and 13:
List of figures Figure 1 : Average
Page 14 and 15:
1.1 Global historical perspective t
Page 16 and 17:
1.3 The MDG sanitation targets Acco
Page 18 and 19:
There are some 50 diseases, includi
Page 20 and 21:
1.6 Kenyan context of eco-sanitatio
Page 22 and 23:
The most commonly used technologies
Page 24 and 25:
The EU-GTZ-SIDA EcoSan Promotion pr
Page 26 and 27:
Vision 2030 focuses on correcting K
Page 28 and 29:
2.1 The Philosophy of Ecological-sa
Page 30 and 31:
The benefits of humanure is maximiz
Page 32 and 33:
2.4 Reaping maximum benefits from E
Page 34 and 35:
Figure 4 : Ecosan water and nutrien
Page 36 and 37:
24 Figure 5 : Imparting knowledge o
Page 38 and 39:
2.8 Policy And Advocacy Issues On S
Page 40 and 41:
Other very involved ministries are
Page 42 and 43:
Sanitation coupled with hygienic ha
Page 44 and 45:
Of these, 470 million live in Afric
Page 46 and 47:
3.1 Introduction A Urine Diverting
Page 48 and 49: The diverted urine that is loaded w
Page 50 and 51: Flush systems come in different des
Page 52 and 53: alternately with only one vault in
Page 54 and 55: Slab thickness of 80 mm is used to
Page 56 and 57: Steps Steps are direct in front of
Page 58 and 59: Figure 8: Modulated squatting pan i
Page 60 and 61: Although this is the cheapest optio
Page 62 and 63: Faeces should be applied and mixed
Page 64 and 65: 4.1 Introduction An Anaerobic Baffl
Page 66 and 67: Organic.dry.matter.(Kg).(Kg.ODM /m3
Page 68 and 69: Table 4: The charge ratio for vario
Page 70 and 71: Proportion of building materials:
Page 72 and 73: Anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR) con
Page 74 and 75: conditions. To produce acetic acid,
Page 76 and 77: 5.1 The Fossa Alterna 5.1.1 Introdu
Page 78 and 79: • Add more leaves periodically to
Page 80 and 81: Once working at full capacity it is
Page 82 and 83: • No electrical energy required
Page 84 and 85: • Ensure that primary treatment i
Page 86 and 87: • Ensure that primary treatment i
Page 88 and 89: 6.1 Introduction Many public instit
Page 90 and 91: 6.2 Case examples of schools using
Page 93 and 94: Technical Guide to EcoSan Promotion
Page 95 and 96: Technical Guide to EcoSan Promotion
Page 97: Technical Guide to EcoSan Promotion
Page 101: Technical Guide to EcoSan Promotion
Page 112 and 113: 100
Page 114 and 115: 102 Annex 3 Drawings of 6m Anaerobi
Page 116 and 117: 104
Page 118 and 119: 106
Page 120 and 121: 108
Page 122 and 123: 111
Page 124 and 125: 112
Page 126 and 127: 112
Page 128 and 129: Annex 4 Sources of waste water cons
Page 130 and 131: Volume of liquid(VL) m 3 /d Is equa
Page 132 and 133: Length of each chamber m 1 Depth of
Page 134: About this book In Kenya, many publ
show all

Technical Guide to EcoSan Promotion

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?