Download - Royal Australian Navy
Download - Royal Australian Navy
Download - Royal Australian Navy
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
86 NAVY ENGINEERING BULLETIN AUGUST 2002<br />
of effort (ROE) across the fleet,<br />
with the result that R9 servicings<br />
are coming due in about 14 - 18<br />
months. The service includes the<br />
R1 to R7 inclusive (and the R8<br />
every fourth R9) with an<br />
additional 10 servicings. It is<br />
generally aligned with the<br />
Programmed Aircraft Survey (PAS<br />
- see below) and as a result the<br />
aircraft is significantly stripped to<br />
allow for PAS inspections.<br />
Numerous components, including<br />
the MRH spindles, are subjected<br />
to an extensive bay service or<br />
overhaul during the R9, and a<br />
number of fatigue critical<br />
components are replaced during<br />
the service. Emergent work, the<br />
shortage of some critical<br />
Maintenance Managed Items<br />
(MMIs), and corrosion<br />
rectification following the PAS<br />
inspection usually results in the<br />
service taking in excess of three<br />
to four months. If extensive<br />
rework is required, an aircraft<br />
could be out of operational<br />
service for six months or longer.<br />
Programmed Aircraft Survey<br />
Programmed Aircraft Survey (PAS)<br />
inspections are carried out every<br />
two years. Their intention is to<br />
establish the material state of an<br />
aircraft following a period of<br />
service and then return that<br />
aircraft to an ‘as new’ condition<br />
prior to further service. PAS<br />
rectification work often involves<br />
the replacement of ‘working rivets’<br />
and rectification of corrosion in<br />
difficult to access areas. As<br />
mentioned above, the PAS usually<br />
aligns with an R9 although the<br />
current ROE is causing the 600-<br />
airframe hour mark to become<br />
misaligned with the 2 year PAS<br />
requirement.<br />
Factors Affecting Service<br />
Timeframes<br />
Although I have tried to give an<br />
indication here of how long it<br />
takes to complete each block<br />
servicing operation, there are a<br />
number of factors that will<br />
influence how long a particular<br />
ship’s flight or Squadron servicing<br />
unit takes to complete the<br />
operation. Critical to any servicing<br />
is the provision of spares to<br />
replace any components found<br />
unserviceable during the service.<br />
Although the organisation is<br />
getting much better at predicting<br />
spares usage, it is possible that<br />
an aircraft could be delayed out<br />
of a service due to the<br />
unavailability of an O ring, bolt or<br />
other ‘minor’ component. The<br />
timely conduct of any service<br />
requires the appropriate spares<br />
to be available when required.<br />
The second critical factor is the<br />
skill level and experience of<br />
personnel. A future article in this<br />
magazine will cover Aviation<br />
Technician qualifications and<br />
authorisations, but suffice to say<br />
that all personnel posted to a<br />
Ship’s flight are fully trained and<br />
authorised. 816 Squadron on the<br />
other hand has a mixture of<br />
experienced maintainers<br />
responsible for training those who<br />
have recently joined. Obviously<br />
the experience levels of any team<br />
of maintainers will directly<br />
influence the progress of a<br />
servicing.<br />
Finally, emergent work. It is not<br />
uncommon remove a component<br />
for its bay service only to find<br />
airframe corrosion that needs to<br />
be rectified prior to returning the<br />
aircraft to a serviceable state.<br />
Emergent work during a servicing<br />
can have a detrimental affect on<br />
the progress of a servicing but<br />
the continued airworthiness of an<br />
aircraft relies on all maintainers<br />
to conduct their job professionally<br />
and rectify any faults they<br />
discover.<br />
Hopefully this article has<br />
broadened your understanding of<br />
how we keep these aircraft in the<br />
air. Should you desire any further<br />
information about the Seahawk<br />
helicopter or the maintenance<br />
practices employed, please<br />
forward an email to the author at<br />
scott.lockey@defence.gov.au.<br />
About the Author - Lieutenant Commander<br />
Scott Lockey is the Aviation Engineering<br />
Officer at 816 Squadron. He posted to the<br />
Squadron in January of this year following<br />
completion of the inaugural <strong>Australian</strong><br />
Command and Staff Course. Previous<br />
postings have included the Aircraft<br />
Maintenance and Flight Trials Unit<br />
(AMAFTU), Workshops’ Officer at RNAS<br />
Portland (HMS Osprey), 816 Squadron as<br />
the Deputy Aviation Engineering Officer and<br />
the Fleet Aviation Engineering Unit as the<br />
CAMM Engineer. He holds an Honours<br />
degree in Aeronautical Engineering and<br />
recently attained Chartered Professional<br />
Engineer status through the Institution of<br />
Engineers, Australia.