06.09.2014 Views

Download - Royal Australian Navy

Download - Royal Australian Navy

Download - Royal Australian Navy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

86 NAVY ENGINEERING BULLETIN AUGUST 2002<br />

of effort (ROE) across the fleet,<br />

with the result that R9 servicings<br />

are coming due in about 14 - 18<br />

months. The service includes the<br />

R1 to R7 inclusive (and the R8<br />

every fourth R9) with an<br />

additional 10 servicings. It is<br />

generally aligned with the<br />

Programmed Aircraft Survey (PAS<br />

- see below) and as a result the<br />

aircraft is significantly stripped to<br />

allow for PAS inspections.<br />

Numerous components, including<br />

the MRH spindles, are subjected<br />

to an extensive bay service or<br />

overhaul during the R9, and a<br />

number of fatigue critical<br />

components are replaced during<br />

the service. Emergent work, the<br />

shortage of some critical<br />

Maintenance Managed Items<br />

(MMIs), and corrosion<br />

rectification following the PAS<br />

inspection usually results in the<br />

service taking in excess of three<br />

to four months. If extensive<br />

rework is required, an aircraft<br />

could be out of operational<br />

service for six months or longer.<br />

Programmed Aircraft Survey<br />

Programmed Aircraft Survey (PAS)<br />

inspections are carried out every<br />

two years. Their intention is to<br />

establish the material state of an<br />

aircraft following a period of<br />

service and then return that<br />

aircraft to an ‘as new’ condition<br />

prior to further service. PAS<br />

rectification work often involves<br />

the replacement of ‘working rivets’<br />

and rectification of corrosion in<br />

difficult to access areas. As<br />

mentioned above, the PAS usually<br />

aligns with an R9 although the<br />

current ROE is causing the 600-<br />

airframe hour mark to become<br />

misaligned with the 2 year PAS<br />

requirement.<br />

Factors Affecting Service<br />

Timeframes<br />

Although I have tried to give an<br />

indication here of how long it<br />

takes to complete each block<br />

servicing operation, there are a<br />

number of factors that will<br />

influence how long a particular<br />

ship’s flight or Squadron servicing<br />

unit takes to complete the<br />

operation. Critical to any servicing<br />

is the provision of spares to<br />

replace any components found<br />

unserviceable during the service.<br />

Although the organisation is<br />

getting much better at predicting<br />

spares usage, it is possible that<br />

an aircraft could be delayed out<br />

of a service due to the<br />

unavailability of an O ring, bolt or<br />

other ‘minor’ component. The<br />

timely conduct of any service<br />

requires the appropriate spares<br />

to be available when required.<br />

The second critical factor is the<br />

skill level and experience of<br />

personnel. A future article in this<br />

magazine will cover Aviation<br />

Technician qualifications and<br />

authorisations, but suffice to say<br />

that all personnel posted to a<br />

Ship’s flight are fully trained and<br />

authorised. 816 Squadron on the<br />

other hand has a mixture of<br />

experienced maintainers<br />

responsible for training those who<br />

have recently joined. Obviously<br />

the experience levels of any team<br />

of maintainers will directly<br />

influence the progress of a<br />

servicing.<br />

Finally, emergent work. It is not<br />

uncommon remove a component<br />

for its bay service only to find<br />

airframe corrosion that needs to<br />

be rectified prior to returning the<br />

aircraft to a serviceable state.<br />

Emergent work during a servicing<br />

can have a detrimental affect on<br />

the progress of a servicing but<br />

the continued airworthiness of an<br />

aircraft relies on all maintainers<br />

to conduct their job professionally<br />

and rectify any faults they<br />

discover.<br />

Hopefully this article has<br />

broadened your understanding of<br />

how we keep these aircraft in the<br />

air. Should you desire any further<br />

information about the Seahawk<br />

helicopter or the maintenance<br />

practices employed, please<br />

forward an email to the author at<br />

scott.lockey@defence.gov.au.<br />

About the Author - Lieutenant Commander<br />

Scott Lockey is the Aviation Engineering<br />

Officer at 816 Squadron. He posted to the<br />

Squadron in January of this year following<br />

completion of the inaugural <strong>Australian</strong><br />

Command and Staff Course. Previous<br />

postings have included the Aircraft<br />

Maintenance and Flight Trials Unit<br />

(AMAFTU), Workshops’ Officer at RNAS<br />

Portland (HMS Osprey), 816 Squadron as<br />

the Deputy Aviation Engineering Officer and<br />

the Fleet Aviation Engineering Unit as the<br />

CAMM Engineer. He holds an Honours<br />

degree in Aeronautical Engineering and<br />

recently attained Chartered Professional<br />

Engineer status through the Institution of<br />

Engineers, Australia.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!