08.09.2014 Views

Systems Analysis of Zaragoza Urban Water - SWITCH - Managing ...

Systems Analysis of Zaragoza Urban Water - SWITCH - Managing ...

Systems Analysis of Zaragoza Urban Water - SWITCH - Managing ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Systems</strong> <strong>Analysis</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Zaragoza</strong> UWS<br />

Guillermo Penagos<br />

There is a need <strong>of</strong> information tools that serve to evaluate this complexity and search for<br />

alternatives that make the concept <strong>of</strong> sustainability fully operational for the <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Water</strong><br />

System. Initial interest <strong>of</strong> researchers and decision makers in this regard was to produce<br />

ad hoc Indicators for Sustainable Development (Lundin and Morrison, 2002)<br />

A large number <strong>of</strong> indicators are used by water and waste water organizations to assess<br />

their technical performance. Such indicators may differ between different organizations<br />

and different countries. The results are large amounts <strong>of</strong> data, difficult to understand and<br />

to interpret. Besides only few <strong>of</strong> those indicators have been developed to quantify<br />

sustainability. There is still a need for a limited number <strong>of</strong> sustainability indicators for<br />

urban water systems (Lundin, 1999).<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the main problems <strong>of</strong> quantifying sustainability is the lack <strong>of</strong> a structured<br />

methodology to develop indicators, with the consequent risk that such indicators would<br />

be ineffective and, possibly detrimental in promoting sustainability objectives (Lundin<br />

and Morrison, 2002). Therefore, recent studies have based on <strong>Systems</strong> <strong>Analysis</strong><br />

Approach and have used techniques related to the concept <strong>of</strong> industrial ecology, such as<br />

Material Flow <strong>Analysis</strong> and Life Cycle Assessment. When properly followed, those<br />

techniques have proven to be quite effective to evaluate environmental performance <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Systems</strong>. Some authors have concluded that such techniques are needed<br />

as a basis for all other studies concerning <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> because the flows, the<br />

major sources and the fate <strong>of</strong> water and its major constituents such as nutrients,<br />

pathogens and harmful chemicals, must be clear for all alternative management<br />

strategies (Ahlman, 2006; Benedetti et al., 2005; Lindqvist and Malmborg, 2004).<br />

LCA analysis is suggested to be a comprehensive technique to assess environmental<br />

sustainability <strong>of</strong> UWS. The term “Life cycle” referes to the major activities in the course <strong>of</strong><br />

a product lifespan from its manufacture, use and maintenance, to its final disposal,<br />

including the raw material acquisition required to manufacture the product. Impacts<br />

related to outputs will be emissions to different environmental compartments (Lundin and<br />

Morrison, 2002).<br />

The main advantage <strong>of</strong> LCA is that it can contribute to evaluate the impacts upon<br />

different environmental compartments, preventing the implementation <strong>of</strong> management<br />

10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!