29.09.2014 Views

WP3: Rail Passenger Transport - TOSCA Project

WP3: Rail Passenger Transport - TOSCA Project

WP3: Rail Passenger Transport - TOSCA Project

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 5-1 summarizes estimated trends of energy use over time as per cent of the reference<br />

year, for different types of rail services, with all technologies aggregated in combination. For<br />

electric trains higher speeds are included; for diesel trains speeds are assumed to be constant<br />

over time.<br />

2050 2025 2009 reference<br />

High speed<br />

67.9%<br />

80.7%<br />

100.0%<br />

Intercity &<br />

Regional electric<br />

53.8%<br />

72.3%<br />

100.0%<br />

Intercity &<br />

Regional diesel<br />

49.3%<br />

69.6%<br />

100.0%<br />

Local city<br />

45.8%<br />

67.5%<br />

100.0%<br />

Figure 5-1<br />

Trends in specific energy use (per passenger-km) over time for different types<br />

of rail passenger services (new trains).<br />

All technologies and influence of higher speeds are aggregated.<br />

All types of rail passenger transport – from ‘High-speed trains’ to ‘Local city trains’ - are<br />

competing with road transport, i.e. cars and buses. Air transport (in the range 300 - 1000 km) is<br />

mainly competing with ‘High-speed trains’ and to some extent with fast intercity trains (i.e.<br />

part of the ‘Intercity or regional’ segment). To compare with road and air transport respectively<br />

energy and GHG characteristics for the rail mode is therefore divided in two tables, where<br />

- Table 5-3a summarizes energy use and the resulting GHG emissions aggregated and<br />

weighted over intercity, regional and city rail services, for comparison mainly with<br />

road transport. For diesel trains only the results of combinations are presented;<br />

- Table 5-3b summarizes energy use and the resulting GHG emissions for high-speed<br />

rail, for comparison also with air transport.<br />

Estimated lower (LB) and upper (UB) bounds are also indicated.<br />

Inter-rail mode shift (i.e. between different types of rail services) is not considered in the<br />

aggregated estimations in Figure 5-1, i.e. the percentage share in passenger-km is as for the<br />

reference trains according to Table 2-1. In reality a shift from ‘Intercity or regional’ trains to<br />

‘High-speed trains’ is anticipated. However, as the estimated future energy use and GHG<br />

content (per passenger-km) only have a modest difference for these two types of trains, an<br />

internal mode-shift will only have a modest influence (likely less than 5 %) on the total<br />

average, although toward reduced emissions. Also, an internal mode shift from diesel to<br />

electric trains is anticipated, although uncertain to what degree. However, as diesel trains have<br />

just a minor market share today (about 12 %), such a limited mode shift will also only have a<br />

minor, however positive, influence on the average GHG emissions from rail operations. The<br />

assumed two mode shifts will both contribute to reduced GHG emissions and can be considered<br />

as an extra margin in the estimated improvements.<br />

Deliverable D4 – <strong>WP3</strong> passenger 20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!