01.10.2014 Views

Oral Health in Norway. The HUNT Study.

Oral Health in Norway. The HUNT Study.

Oral Health in Norway. The HUNT Study.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> oral health Trøndelag studies<br />

<strong>The</strong> material comprised data from <strong>in</strong>dependently selected random samples of a population<br />

liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> four municipalities <strong>in</strong> the county of Nord-Trøndelag <strong>in</strong> 1973, 1983, 1994 and 2006.<br />

<strong>The</strong> age-groups were selected accord<strong>in</strong>g to the rules of cohort analysis <strong>in</strong> such a way that the<br />

difference <strong>in</strong> years between the studies matches the age of the birth-cohort <strong>in</strong> the same year<br />

(Figure 1). In addition, <strong>in</strong> each survey year samples of 35-44 year olds were draw. Table 1<br />

shows that the 1959-1960 birth-cohort was 13-14 years old <strong>in</strong> 1973, 23-24 years old <strong>in</strong> 1983,<br />

34-35 years old <strong>in</strong> 1994 and 46-47 <strong>in</strong> 2006 <strong>in</strong> 2006. <strong>The</strong> birth-cohort 1929-1938 was 35-44<br />

years old <strong>in</strong> 1973, 45-54 years old <strong>in</strong> 1983, 46-54 <strong>in</strong> 1994 and 68-77 <strong>in</strong> 2006. Thus random<br />

samples of two birth-cohorts were followed longitud<strong>in</strong>ally. Thirty-five to forty-four year olds<br />

were exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> 1973, 1983, 1994 and 2006, follow<strong>in</strong>g a pattern of repeated cross-sectional<br />

studies <strong>The</strong> age specific sample size for each of the participat<strong>in</strong>g counties were 500 <strong>in</strong> 1973<br />

and <strong>in</strong> 1983 and was reduced to 350 <strong>in</strong> 1994 and 250 <strong>in</strong> 2006. <strong>The</strong> sample <strong>in</strong> the two-year<br />

age-group 46-47 was 100 persons. Table 1 shows the size of the samples and the participation<br />

rate.<br />

<strong>The</strong> methods of data collection comprised standardized cl<strong>in</strong>ical measurements and selfadm<strong>in</strong>istered<br />

questionnaires (10-11). In 1973, 1983, 1994, and <strong>in</strong> 2006 two, ten, eleven and<br />

two calibrated dental teams, respectively, collected the data. Two senior researchers (DH and<br />

AAS) followed and guided the procedures s<strong>in</strong>ce 1973 <strong>in</strong> order to secure standardized<br />

conditions and comparability among the surveys. Calibration exercises were conducted each<br />

study year, and the results found satisfactory (15). <strong>The</strong> exam<strong>in</strong>ations took place at the public<br />

dental cl<strong>in</strong>ics of the Nord-Trøndelag County. Permission was granted by public authorities<br />

and by the participants’ <strong>in</strong>formed consent. All necessary permissions were given through out<br />

the study period and by the participants’ <strong>in</strong>formed consent. In 2006 the study was approved<br />

by the Regional ethical committee Middle of <strong>Norway</strong> and approved by the Norwegian<br />

Council of Research.<br />

<strong>The</strong> cl<strong>in</strong>ical variables were number of present teeth (PT), sound teeth and surfaces (ST,<br />

SS) and functional teeth and surfaces (SFT, SFS) and DMFT and DMFS <strong>in</strong>dex. DMFT and<br />

DMFS are the sums of DT/S, MT/S and FT/S, where DT/S is def<strong>in</strong>ed as the number of<br />

teeth/surfaces with primary and secondary caries, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g root and coronal caries. Only<br />

caries with a dist<strong>in</strong>guishable brake <strong>in</strong> the surface was recorded. Miss<strong>in</strong>g Teeth is the number

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!