louisa picquet, the octoroon: or inside views of - Negro Artist
louisa picquet, the octoroon: or inside views of - Negro Artist
louisa picquet, the octoroon: or inside views of - Negro Artist
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Louisa Picquet, <strong>the</strong> Oct<strong>or</strong>oon 48<br />
"Abolition" eyes? Alas f<strong>or</strong> those tell-tale mulatto, and quadroon, and <strong>oct<strong>or</strong>oon</strong><br />
faces! They stand out unimpeached, and still augmenting as God's testimony to<br />
<strong>the</strong> deep m<strong>or</strong>al pollution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Slave States. We may shudder at <strong>the</strong><br />
"hea<strong>the</strong>nism" <strong>of</strong> a Turkish harem, and send missionaries to convert <strong>the</strong><br />
Mohammedans; we may stand aghast at <strong>the</strong> idea <strong>of</strong> twenty thousand Syrian<br />
women sold to supply <strong>the</strong> harems <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mussulmans, and pour out our money<br />
like water to relieve <strong>or</strong> release <strong>the</strong>m; but wherein is all this a whit w<strong>or</strong>se than<br />
what is constantly practiced, with scarce a w<strong>or</strong>d <strong>of</strong> unfav<strong>or</strong>able comment, in our<br />
own "Christian" (?) land? If <strong>the</strong>re is any difference, it is certainly in fav<strong>or</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
Turk; f<strong>or</strong> nei<strong>the</strong>r his concubines n<strong>or</strong> his children by <strong>the</strong>m are slaves; while, in<br />
this country, our chivalrous "sou<strong>the</strong>rn gentlemen" beget thousands <strong>of</strong> slaves;<br />
Page 52<br />
and hundreds <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> children <strong>of</strong> our free white citizens are sold in <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn<br />
slave markets every year.<br />
III.--The failure <strong>of</strong> Mr. Cook, with his large cotton plantation, and <strong>the</strong><br />
subsequent sale <strong>of</strong> his slaves by <strong>the</strong> sheriff (probably to pay some<br />
"conservative" New Y<strong>or</strong>k merchant), illustrates <strong>the</strong> "happy condition" <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se<br />
slaves who have such "kind masters," but are, never<strong>the</strong>less, liable to be sold f<strong>or</strong><br />
debt at <strong>the</strong> auction-block, not only upon <strong>the</strong> death <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir master, but at any<br />
time during his life; and <strong>the</strong>n, as in this case, bro<strong>the</strong>rs and sisters, parents and<br />
children, wives and husbands (if <strong>the</strong>re be any such), must part to meet no m<strong>or</strong>e<br />
in this w<strong>or</strong>ld.<br />
"But <strong>the</strong>se," says one, "are <strong>the</strong> evils <strong>of</strong> slavery, to which I am as much opposed<br />
as you are." Verily, <strong>the</strong>y are <strong>the</strong> "evils," but <strong>the</strong>y are just such "evils" as<br />
necessarily belong to <strong>the</strong> system, and inhere in it, and without which slavery<br />
never did and never can exist. While <strong>the</strong> tree stands it will bear just <strong>the</strong>se fruits,<br />
and no o<strong>the</strong>r. To sustain <strong>the</strong> system, <strong>the</strong>ref<strong>or</strong>e, <strong>or</strong> to practice under <strong>or</strong> apologize<br />
f<strong>or</strong> it, is virtually to abet all its abominations. There is no escape from this<br />
conclusion.<br />
What, <strong>the</strong>n, is <strong>the</strong> duty <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> American citizen who loves his country--<strong>the</strong><br />
Christian citizen, especially? Ought he not to sot his face against this giant<br />
wrong in every possible way? Can he even hold his peace concerning it, and be<br />
innocent? Ought he not to use all his influence, socially, ecclesiatically, and<br />
politically, to undermine and destroy it? Should he not speak and write against<br />
it, pray and protest against it, give and vote against it, till it shall wi<strong>the</strong>r under<br />
24.03.2006