01.10.2014 Views

louisa picquet, the octoroon: or inside views of - Negro Artist

louisa picquet, the octoroon: or inside views of - Negro Artist

louisa picquet, the octoroon: or inside views of - Negro Artist

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Louisa Picquet, <strong>the</strong> Oct<strong>or</strong>oon 48<br />

"Abolition" eyes? Alas f<strong>or</strong> those tell-tale mulatto, and quadroon, and <strong>oct<strong>or</strong>oon</strong><br />

faces! They stand out unimpeached, and still augmenting as God's testimony to<br />

<strong>the</strong> deep m<strong>or</strong>al pollution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Slave States. We may shudder at <strong>the</strong><br />

"hea<strong>the</strong>nism" <strong>of</strong> a Turkish harem, and send missionaries to convert <strong>the</strong><br />

Mohammedans; we may stand aghast at <strong>the</strong> idea <strong>of</strong> twenty thousand Syrian<br />

women sold to supply <strong>the</strong> harems <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mussulmans, and pour out our money<br />

like water to relieve <strong>or</strong> release <strong>the</strong>m; but wherein is all this a whit w<strong>or</strong>se than<br />

what is constantly practiced, with scarce a w<strong>or</strong>d <strong>of</strong> unfav<strong>or</strong>able comment, in our<br />

own "Christian" (?) land? If <strong>the</strong>re is any difference, it is certainly in fav<strong>or</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Turk; f<strong>or</strong> nei<strong>the</strong>r his concubines n<strong>or</strong> his children by <strong>the</strong>m are slaves; while, in<br />

this country, our chivalrous "sou<strong>the</strong>rn gentlemen" beget thousands <strong>of</strong> slaves;<br />

Page 52<br />

and hundreds <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> children <strong>of</strong> our free white citizens are sold in <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn<br />

slave markets every year.<br />

III.--The failure <strong>of</strong> Mr. Cook, with his large cotton plantation, and <strong>the</strong><br />

subsequent sale <strong>of</strong> his slaves by <strong>the</strong> sheriff (probably to pay some<br />

"conservative" New Y<strong>or</strong>k merchant), illustrates <strong>the</strong> "happy condition" <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se<br />

slaves who have such "kind masters," but are, never<strong>the</strong>less, liable to be sold f<strong>or</strong><br />

debt at <strong>the</strong> auction-block, not only upon <strong>the</strong> death <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir master, but at any<br />

time during his life; and <strong>the</strong>n, as in this case, bro<strong>the</strong>rs and sisters, parents and<br />

children, wives and husbands (if <strong>the</strong>re be any such), must part to meet no m<strong>or</strong>e<br />

in this w<strong>or</strong>ld.<br />

"But <strong>the</strong>se," says one, "are <strong>the</strong> evils <strong>of</strong> slavery, to which I am as much opposed<br />

as you are." Verily, <strong>the</strong>y are <strong>the</strong> "evils," but <strong>the</strong>y are just such "evils" as<br />

necessarily belong to <strong>the</strong> system, and inhere in it, and without which slavery<br />

never did and never can exist. While <strong>the</strong> tree stands it will bear just <strong>the</strong>se fruits,<br />

and no o<strong>the</strong>r. To sustain <strong>the</strong> system, <strong>the</strong>ref<strong>or</strong>e, <strong>or</strong> to practice under <strong>or</strong> apologize<br />

f<strong>or</strong> it, is virtually to abet all its abominations. There is no escape from this<br />

conclusion.<br />

What, <strong>the</strong>n, is <strong>the</strong> duty <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> American citizen who loves his country--<strong>the</strong><br />

Christian citizen, especially? Ought he not to sot his face against this giant<br />

wrong in every possible way? Can he even hold his peace concerning it, and be<br />

innocent? Ought he not to use all his influence, socially, ecclesiatically, and<br />

politically, to undermine and destroy it? Should he not speak and write against<br />

it, pray and protest against it, give and vote against it, till it shall wi<strong>the</strong>r under<br />

24.03.2006

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!