03.10.2014 Views

minutes - City of Stirling

minutes - City of Stirling

minutes - City of Stirling

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MINUTES OF THE ORDINARY MEETING OF COUNCIL<br />

21 AUGUST 2012<br />

Council Resolution<br />

0812/035<br />

Moved Councillor Italiano, seconded Councillor Cooke<br />

That pursuant to the Orders made by the State Administrative Tribunal in accordance<br />

with Section 31 <strong>of</strong> the State Administrative Tribunal Act 2004 (WA), the Council<br />

RECONSIDERS its previous decision, and that pursuant to Clause 8.4 <strong>of</strong> Local<br />

Planning Scheme No.3, the revised application for retrospective planning approval for<br />

an Unauthorised Front Fence at Lot 44, House Number 16, Foley Street, Balcatta be<br />

APPROVED, subject to the following condition:-<br />

a. The security gates are to remain open during normal business hours and allow<br />

unimpeded access to both staff and visitor parking areas.<br />

The motion was put and declared CARRIED (12/1).<br />

For: Councillors Boothman, Cooke, Ferrante, Italiano, Jenkinson, Lagan, Michael, Proud,<br />

Re, Sargent, Stewart and Willox.<br />

Against: Councillor Tyzack.<br />

Reason for change<br />

The Committee formed the view that the fence:-<br />

cannot be located behind the building setback line as suggested by the <strong>City</strong>'s Industrial<br />

Design Guidelines;<br />

enhances the security <strong>of</strong> the property; and<br />

does not detract from the streetscape.<br />

Committee Recommendation<br />

That pursuant to the Orders made by the State Administrative Tribunal in accordance with<br />

Section 31 <strong>of</strong> the State Administrative Tribunal Act 2004 (WA), the Council RECONSIDERS<br />

its previous decision, and that pursuant to Clause 8.4 <strong>of</strong> Local Planning Scheme No.3, the<br />

revised application for retrospective planning approval for an unauthorised front fence at Lot<br />

44, House Number 16, Foley Street, Balcatta be APPROVED, as it:-<br />

cannot be located behind the building setback line as suggested by the <strong>City</strong>'s<br />

Industrial Design Guidelines;<br />

enhances the security <strong>of</strong> the property; and<br />

does not detract from the streetscape.<br />

Reason for change<br />

The Committee formed the view that the front fence was acceptable for the reasons outlined<br />

in the recommendation.<br />

20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!