Metro North-West JDAP - Agenda - Meeting No 23 ... - City of Stirling
Metro North-West JDAP - Agenda - Meeting No 23 ... - City of Stirling
Metro North-West JDAP - Agenda - Meeting No 23 ... - City of Stirling
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
setback area will only be used for landscaping and car parking and it is considered<br />
that the intention <strong>of</strong> the policy provision is achieved.<br />
Street Trees<br />
The application proposed the removal <strong>of</strong> an existing street tree, as it conflicts with the<br />
proposed crossover location. The <strong>City</strong>’s Street Tree Policy (ATTACHMENT 9)<br />
requires that:<br />
The <strong>City</strong> will not remove street trees except where retention is considered<br />
undesirable or unreasonable, such as where: exceptional circumstances exist<br />
relating to public risk and safety; the tree species is not an approved variety and is<br />
not acceptable to the <strong>City</strong>; or the tree precludes redevelopment <strong>of</strong> an adjoining site,<br />
with no other reasonable alternative to removal.<br />
The application was referred to the <strong>City</strong>’s Parks and Reserves Business Unit for<br />
comment who have advised the following:<br />
• The tree in question is a mature Rose Gum or Eucalyptus Grandis.<br />
• There are two (2) Rose Gums located within the road reserve adjacent to Lot<br />
64<br />
• Street trees are to be retained in all circumstances. However where trees are<br />
poor <strong>of</strong> health, structure or measured as high risk due to position and nature<br />
they might then be considered for removal and replacement.<br />
• The proposed landscape plan has nominated tree species, shrubs and<br />
groundcover to be planted within the property but does not show the<br />
remaining Rose Gum within the verge.<br />
• Using the pictures provided it shows the Rose gum situated on the left as you<br />
face the property to have an included union approximately 3m from the<br />
ground. It also shows a secondary branch having died and is poorly attached.<br />
There are several occluding stubs along the apical stems indicating where<br />
other branches have failed or have been removed over its lifetime. The<br />
second tree to the right <strong>of</strong> the target tree is approximately 22m in height and<br />
width also with recent and aged faults apparent along its apical stems.<br />
Although structurally well balanced a majority <strong>of</strong> the canopy forms over the<br />
development site.<br />
• These Rose gums were planted in an era where the local’s habits were to<br />
plant anything other than native flora (1970’s) hence an overwhelming<br />
presence <strong>of</strong> eastern state and exotic trees in WA and Perth metropolitan<br />
areas.<br />
• The tree in question is <strong>of</strong> poor structure and health. Removal can be justified<br />
for this reason, however due respect might also be made to the larger tree as<br />
to how its form and nature might impact upon the proposed site and design.<br />
Or if retained a condition to impose strict protection conditions upon the<br />
application be made.<br />
• The <strong>City</strong> requires all approved tree removals to be undertaken by a <strong>City</strong> tree<br />
contractor. Payment for this process is to be made at the <strong>City</strong>’s Administration<br />
centre before any work is undertaken.<br />
• An estimate <strong>of</strong> the cost for the tree work will be supplied by the Parks and<br />
Reserves Business unit to the respective Planning Officer.<br />
• Replacement planting is a natural consequence <strong>of</strong> tree removal in an effort to<br />
<strong>of</strong>fset the trees loss.<br />
• A condition to make allowances for tree/s must be included and the cost to<br />
plant is the applicant’s responsibility.<br />
Page 15